97.2% passage rate
District 3
Kshama Sawant
Former councilmember · 2014–2023
Total in available record · LegisRate points
365.82015–2026 records · source checked Oct 8, 2026
174 sponsored measures adopted in the available record.
Service: 2014–2023. Coverage is limited to 2015–2026.
How scoring worksOverview and record
Background and tenure
Former councilmember · recorded terms: 2014–2023. The legislative record shown here covers 2015–2026.
Kshama Sawant is an economist and socialist politician who served on the Seattle City Council from 2014 through 2023, representing District 3. An economics professor before taking office, she became one of the first socialists elected to the council in modern Seattle and organized around a higher minimum wage, labor rights, tenant protections, and taxation of large businesses.
Sawant represented District 3 from 2014 through 2023. Her tenure centered on socialist politics, campaigns for a higher minimum wage and labor protections, tenant issues, and a successful defense against a recall effort.
Background summary adapted from Wikipedia; it is separate from the LegisRate record and score.
Full available record · 2015–2026
Activity record
174 sponsored measures adopted; present or late in 378 of 449 Full Council attendance records.
Outcome, voting, and attendance describe the record; they do not add to or subtract from the LegisRate score.
87 opposed · 0 abstained
378 of 449 records
Sponsorship record106 prime · 63 co-sponsor · 5 unranked · 172 early-recorded
Record details Outcome, voting, attendance, and sponsorship context
Only the latest recorded legislative vote per matter is used; a missing structured tally is not counted as an absence.
Separate public records · non-scoring context
Financial information
Campaign contributions show money given to a campaign. Personal disclosure filings list reported income, investments and financial interests, often in broad ranges. These records do not estimate personal wealth or establish donor influence.
Campaign contributions
Reviewed2019 Council District 3
Selected campaign's reported and SEEC-coded contributions; amendments can change this snapshot.
Checked Oct 12, 2026
Donor list ranks reported donor names by direct private cash and in-kind contributions, net of audited corrections. Vouchers, candidate funding, loans and independent expenditures are separate.
Top 20 reported donor names · 379 names including ties
Equal amounts share a rank; names are alphabetical within a tie. The list includes ties at the cutoff.
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · AARON BOWERSOCK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · AARON DILLEY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · AARON FLASTER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ABRAHAM FLAXMAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ACHILLEFS AKRIVOU Also reported as: ACHILLES AKRIVOU $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ADAM BLEIMAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ADAM BURCH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · AFT LOCAL 3914 $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · AJAY KALHAN KALHAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · AKINWALE OGUNDIPE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALAN J. PRESTON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALAN LLOYD $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALEC HANNAFORD $500.00 total Cash $527.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$27.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALEC JOHNSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALEX GLASSMACHER $500.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$250.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALEX LUCENA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALEXANDER CARPENTER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALKA KURIAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALLAN WRIGHT $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALONZO YBARRA $500.00 total Cash $550.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$50.00
Show 359 more names, including every tie at the cutoff
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALYNE FORTGANG $500.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$250.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ALYSSA A BRYSON $500.00 total Cash $520.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$20.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · AMANDA KOH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · AMANDA PONOMARENKO $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · AMY HAGOPIAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANDREA KIEPE $500.00 total Cash $550.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$50.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANDREW LIN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANDREW SATURN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANGELA YING $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANNA BARNETT $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANNE-MARIE CAVANAUGH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANNEMARIE DOOLEY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANNETTE A SCHEETZ $500.00 total Cash $800.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$300.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANNIE UNRUH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANTHONY S ROBALIK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ANTHONY WILSDON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · APRIL POGUE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ARTHUR CHAMPERNOWNE $500.00 total Cash $1,000.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$500.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ASHLEY TEAGUE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · AUGUST EASTON-CALABRIA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BARBARA PHINNEY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BAUDELIO LLAMAS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BECKY SELENGUT $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BEN STOCKWELL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BETTY CAPEHART $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BION HART JOHNSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BOB COMMIKE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BRAD ARMSTRONG $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BRANDON MADSEN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BRENDAN MCGOVERN $500.00 total Cash $431.38 · in-kind $108.62 · audited corrections −$40.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BRIAN DOUGLAS WEITZNER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BRUCE CASTONGUAY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BRYAN FERRIS $500.00 total Cash $630.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$130.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · BURKE STANSBURY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · C. MARK DALTON $500.00 total Cash $849.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$349.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CALVIN PRIEST $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CAMILLE RICHARDS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CAREY HOWARD $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CAROLYN EDWARDS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CAROLYN MCCONNELL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CASCADE BICYCLE CLUB $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CC REUGE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHAD CASHMAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHAD KIEFFER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHARITY RANGER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHARLES CANNON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHARLES METZ $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHRIS CARROLL $500.00 total Cash $362.38 · in-kind $137.62 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHRIS MANNING $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHRIS PONATH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHRISTINE HOOVLER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHRISTOPHER KRUGER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHRISTOPHER MARTIN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CHRISTOPHER SENDERLING $500.00 total Cash $600.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CLAIRE CHAMPERNOWNE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CLAIRE TONRY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CLARK NGUYEN $500.00 total Cash $550.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$50.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · COLE WILLSEA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · COLIN MOEN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CONNOR BECKERLE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CONSTANTINE KOULOURIS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CORA BERGANTINOS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CRAIG E HANSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · CRYSTAL JOHNSON-STANISLOWSKI $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DAN DIXON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DAN ROACH $500.00 total Cash $503.01 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$3.01
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DANA WHITE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DANIEL ALEGRIA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DANIEL DILEVA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DANIEL JENNINGS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DANIEL KROOP $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DANIEL OJALVO $500.00 total Cash $1,000.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$500.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DANIEL WHITFORD $500.00 total Cash $542.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$42.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DANIELA OLIVA $500.00 total Cash $520.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$20.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DAVID BART $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DAVID BERNAL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DAVID BROOKBANK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DAVID COLSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DAVID MCLANAHAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DAVID MICHAEL BENVENUTI $500.00 total Cash $502.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$2.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DAVID YAO $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DEBORA ARMSTRONG $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DEVON THRUMSTON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DIANE MORRISON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DIANE SNELL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DIANE TAM Also reported as: GREGORY BELL AND DIANE TAM $500.00 total Cash $510.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$10.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DIANNE MADSEN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DOMINICK LAWTON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DONNA CAFITZ Also reported as: DONNA CAFITZ AND KRAIG PECK $500.00 total Cash $600.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DONNA CAFITZ AND KRAIG PECK Also reported as: KRAIG PECK $500.00 total Cash $600.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DOROTHY CAMPBELL $500.00 total Cash $1,000.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$500.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · DOUGLAS F DUMAS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ELAINE NONNEMAN $500.00 total Cash $1,000.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$500.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ELI CIZEWSKI-ROBINSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ELLEN ANDERSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · EMAD GHARAVI $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · EMANNUEL MACEDO $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · EMILY CUNNINGHAM $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · EMILY GROSSMAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ERIC DEE $500.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$250.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ERIC MENNINGA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ERIK KNECHTEL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ERIN BRIGHTWELL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ETHAN J GELLER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ETHAN MANNS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · EVA METZ $500.00 total Cash $502.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$2.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · EVAN SEITCHIK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · EVAN SWAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · EVAN WASNER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · EZRA NUITE $500.00 total Cash $686.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$186.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · FRANGO AKRIVOS $500.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$250.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · FREEMAN RYAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · GABRIEL FELDSTEIN $500.00 total Cash $587.50 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$87.50
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · GAIL TANAKA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · GEORGE BROWN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · GEORGE DE PASQUALE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · GEORGE TALLY $500.00 total Cash $550.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$50.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · GREG TAPPER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · GREGORY BELL Also reported as: GREGORY BELL AND DIANE TAM $500.00 total Cash $510.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$10.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · GREYSON VAN ARSDALE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · HANK STEPHENS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · HANNAH LUCY ATKINSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · HARVEY J SADIS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · HENRY KAMERLING $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · HERIBERTO BIRRUETA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · HOA DAO $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · HUDSON BLOOM $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · HUGH M FOY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ILLYNE JOHNSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · IMOGENE WILLIAMS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ISSA TSENG $500.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$200.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · J BRICKMAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JACK DITTHARDT $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JACOB COLIN MCCARTHY $500.00 total Cash $504.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$4.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JACOB DRUKER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JACOB PRUESS $500.00 total Cash $1,000.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$500.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JACOB SMITH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JAMES F FIFE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JAMES F SNELL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JAMES GRAHAM $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JAMES M SQUIRE $500.00 total Cash $1,000.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$500.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JAMES NING $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JAMES RICE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JAMIE KOWALSKI $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JANE HUNTINGTON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JANICE CAMP $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JARED DOBKIN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JASON HARDWIG $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JAYESH SRIVASTAVA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JAYN FOY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JEDTSADA LAUCHAROEN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JEFF MAY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JEFF MOORE $500.00 total Cash $531.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$31.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JEFFREY AXELBANK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JEFFREY BENVENUTI $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JEFFREY HAAS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JEFFREY SNYDER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JERRY LIEBERMANN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JIM FOX $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOE PLUMMER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOHN FINNAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOHN GALLUP $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOHN HELMIERE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOHN LACOSTE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOHN ROBERTS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOHN RUHLAND $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JONATHAN KAY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JONATHAN MOORE $500.00 total Cash $600.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JONATHAN ROSENBLUM $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JORDAN QUINN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOSEPH SUGRUE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOSEPH WEGMANN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOSHUA RYAN BERRY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOY BUCHER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JOYCE MORRIS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JUDITH E. ZEH $500.00 total Cash $600.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JULIE M STOHLMAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JUSTIN BARE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JUSTIN BLACKWELL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JUSTIN HARRISON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · JUSTIN ROLL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KADE QUARLES $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KAIA GRAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KAITLEN MARK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KAREN COWGILL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KATE SHAFFER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KATHA DALTON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KATHERINE YASI $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KATHRYN M SHIELDS $500.00 total Cash $905.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$405.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KATHY HEFFERNAN $500.00 total Cash $465.34 · in-kind $34.66 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KATIE SICELOFF $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KEVIN CORY OTTEN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · KYLE KILROY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LALJIT SIDHU $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LAURA MADSEN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LAWRENCE POWELSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LETICIA PARKS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LIAM EASTON-CALABRIA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LINDA BOYD $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LINDA HARRIS $500.00 total Cash $555.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$55.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LINDA MALANCHUK-FINNAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LINDA SORIANO $500.00 total Cash $515.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$15.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LOGAN SWAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LORI FREEDMAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · LUCAS GITAR $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MAIA MARES $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MALCOLM OLSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MARCIN ZALEWSKI $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MARGARET CHO $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MARGARET YING $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MARGOT STEWART $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MARIEL NANASI $500.00 total Cash $600.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MARK JOHNSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MARTHA HARRISON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MARTINA MORRIS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MASON DAVID BRYANT IV $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MATT HINEA $500.00 total Cash $530.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$30.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MATT KENISON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MATTHEW FINNELL $500.00 total Cash $600.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MATTHEW SMITH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MATTHEW WYLDER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · METASSIBIA MULUGETA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MICHAEL COVERDALE $500.00 total Cash $900.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$400.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MICHAEL DELANEY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MICHAEL GASTON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MICHAEL GREENSLADE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MICHAEL MELINCHOK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MICHAEL VITZ-WONG $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MICHELLE VECCHIO $500.00 total Cash $504.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$4.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MIKE FISHER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MIKE MALONEY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MIREILLE CECIL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MOLLY KROLAK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MORGAN QUIRK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · MUSTAFA SIYAJ $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · NANCY MULLER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · NANCY RAIKEN $500.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$150.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · NATALIE HOLME ELSBERG $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · NEIL FOX $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · NICHOLAS JONES $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · NICHOLAS KNUDSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · NICK CHRISTENSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · NICK VAIDYANATHAN $500.00 total Cash $515.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$15.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · NISHI CARLSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · OPEIU LOCAL 8 $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · OSCAR VELASCO-SCHMITZ $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PATRICK CARR $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PATRICK DARBY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PAUL HOWARD RUIZ $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PAUL WATSON $500.00 total Cash $584.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$84.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PAULA LUKASZEK $500.00 total Cash $515.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$15.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PEGGY HOTES $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PERCY HATCHERSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PETER MCGRAIN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PETER OBERHOLTZER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PETER SANDERSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PETER TRAVERS $500.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$250.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PHILIP DREW $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PHILIP KOCH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PHILIP SNYDER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PHILIP WOHLSTETTER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PIERRE FLANDIN-BLETY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PRESTON SAHABU $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PRIYA RAGHAV $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PRIYATI GUPTA NEMA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL EMPLOYEES LOCAL 17 $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · PURNIMA DHAVAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · QUARTEZ HARRIS $500.00 total Cash $600.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RACHEL DILLON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RAGHAV KAUSHIK $500.00 total Cash $550.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$50.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RANSON THOMAS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · REBECCA ROVINS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RENEE HOLMES $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RICARDO OLIVARES $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RICHARD CARLSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RICHARD PAULIS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RICHARD POSPESEL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROBERT DARAKJIAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROBERT DESMOND $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROBERT J MCKAY IV Also reported as: ROBERT JAMES MCKAY IV $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROBERT JEFFS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROBERT MORRIS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROBERT RICHARD $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROBERT ROOKE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROBERT SHIELDS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROBERT WOOD $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROD PALMQUIST $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROSEMARY DANIELS $500.00 total Cash $510.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$10.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ROSEMARY DODD $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RUTH SCHAEFER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RYAN BOOKER $500.00 total Cash $530.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$30.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RYAN BORGESON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RYAN KUNKEL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RYAN TIMLIN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · RYLEE FOWLER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SADRUDDIN SALEEM $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SALLY ROBERTS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SALLY J. SORIANO $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SAMANTHA DANIELS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SARAH CHAMPERNOWNE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SARAH CHANG $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SASHA SOMER $500.00 total Cash $515.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$15.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SEAMUS WHELAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SEAN BUTTERFIELD $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SEAN SIBERIO $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SEIU LOCAL 6 $500.00 total Cash $550.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$50.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SERGEY ALEKHNOVICH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SHARON BLYTH-MOSS $500.00 total Cash $394.06 · in-kind $105.94 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SHEILA BUTTERFIELD $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SHESH MATHUR $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SHEVANTHI DANIEL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SHIRLEY HENDERSON $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SIBYL JAMES $500.00 total Cash $600.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SONJA PONATH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · STELLA MARIE LAURENZO $500.00 total Cash $1,000.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$500.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · STEPHANIE DILLEY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · STEPHEN EDWARDS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · STEVE GILBERT $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · STEVE PALM-HOUSER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SUDEB MITRA $500.00 total Cash $515.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$15.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SUE FISHER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SUE HILDRETH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SULAN MLYNAREK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SUNDAR SHARMA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SURESH CHANMUGAM $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SUSHMA VERMA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · SUZANNE HITMAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TARA BROWN $500.00 total Cash $600.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TED VIRDONE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TERESA LOUBET $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TERRELL COPELIN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · THADDEUS ANDRY $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · THEODROS SHIBABAW $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · THOMAS JONES $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TIMOTHEA PHAM $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TIMOTHY SODER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TODD GREENWOOD-GEER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TOMASZ SAKREJDA $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TOSHANA ROBALIK $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TRACY KESSLER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TUOC PHAM $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TY MOORE $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TYLER JUCH $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · TYLER VASSEUR $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · UAW REGION 5 $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · UMA RAGHAVAN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · UNITE HERE LOCAL 8 PAC FUND $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · VALENTINA JUDE WARNER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · VANESSA SCHAEFER $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · VICKI BEKKERS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · VICTOR CREWS $500.00 total Cash $539.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$39.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · WALLIS BOLZ $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · WASH ED ASSOC. PAC $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · WHITNEY HILL $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · WILL SIMONS $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · YASSER MUFTI $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ZACHARY MURSTEIN $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (379 names) · ZHIYUAN ZHANG $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
Names are grouped only by official contributor ID. Similar names, households and employers are not combined based on assumptions.
Campaign funding breakdown
- Anonymous contributions$1,041.54
- Candidate self-financing$227.00
- Miscellaneous receipts$21,820.46
- Direct private cash and in-kind, net of audited corrections$559,815.33
- Unitemized contributions$3,717.10
Sources and coverage
Selected campaign's reported and SEEC-coded contributions; amendments can change this snapshot.
One election cycle; primary and general are combined. This is not a lifetime total.
Contributor names follow public campaign filing IDs; reported names are not inferred identities.
Vouchers, candidate funding, loans and other receipts are separate from the donor ranking.
Independent expenditures are outside the candidate donor list.
This is a dated snapshot; later filings or amendments can change amounts.
Independent expenditures are not included in this donor list; this does not mean none were reported. Separate from direct candidate donors; deferred in this pilot. Check the separate SEEC record
Personal financial disclosure
ReviewedLatest available publicly indexed PDC personal filing as of 2026-10-12; actual filing office: CITY COUNCIL MEMBER — CITY OF SEATTLE. Covers 2023-01-01 through 2023-12-31. Historical personal disclosure, not present wealth or necessarily income/assets during Seattle Council service.
Checked Oct 12, 2026
Washington PDC Personal Financial Affairs (F-1) · official statement viewer
Coverage year 2023 · Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2023 · received Jun 25, 2024
View 8 disclosed entries
Disclosed income · 1
-
City of Seattle
Seattle City Councilmember Filer
- Reported income range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
Financial assets and investment income · 4
-
Salal Credit Union
checking Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value rangeLess than $30,000.00
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
-
Salal Credit Union
checking Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$30,000.00 - $59,999.99
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
-
Salal Credit Union
savings Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value rangeLess than $30,000.00
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
-
Standard Insurance Company
Life Filer
- Reported value range$200,000.00 - $499,999.99
Washington real estate · 1
-
Washington real estate
Reported property; location omitted Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$500,000.00 - $749,999.99
Disclosed creditors · 2
-
Newrez LLC
Real-estate creditor Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Original debt range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
- Current debt range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
-
Home Depot
Reported creditor Filer
- Original debt rangeLess than $30,000.00
- Ending debt rangeLess than $30,000.00
Sources and coverage
Latest available publicly indexed PDC personal filing as of 2026-10-12; actual filing office: CITY COUNCIL MEMBER — CITY OF SEATTLE. Covers 2023-01-01 through 2023-12-31. Historical personal disclosure, not present wealth or necessarily income/assets during Seattle Council service.
Self-reported personal disclosure, separate from campaign contributions, government finance and LegisRate scores. Bands are not exact income or net worth. Asset values describe the reporting period, not present holdings. An entry does not establish a conflict, misconduct or donor influence. Blank amount fields remain unspecified.
Includes filer and explicitly joint entries only. Family-only entries, all addresses, parcel identifiers, contacts, signatures, account identifiers, loan terms/security and unnecessary personal descriptions are omitted. Joint bands are not divided into a personal share.
Manual category/identity review of actual official source JSON; no net-worth calculation.
No included row is not evidence of no income, no assets, no liabilities or no business role.
Mortgages are drawn from the real-estate section as well as the separate debt section.
Repeated source rows are preserved; account labels or repeated bands are not deduplicated.
Two checking rows have the same description and different bands. Both source rows are retained without aggregation or inferred duplication.
SEEC separate local F-1 statements · checked Oct 12, 2026: SEEC directs readers to contact its office for statement copies. No request made. Source
What the work concerns
Policy-area mix
Utilities & Technology accounts for the largest share of points in the full 2015–2026 record: 170.5 points (46.6%).
Hover or focus a slice for detail.
Utilities & Technology
170.5 points · 46.6%Housing & Homelessness
61.1 points · 16.7%Government Operations & Finance
29.0 points · 7.9%Civil Rights & Democracy
23.4 points · 6.4%Public Safety & Justice
18.8 points · 5.1%Land Use & Development
16.4 points · 4.5%Environment, Climate & Parks
15.8 points · 4.3%Health & Human Services
12.5 points · 3.4%Transportation & Infrastructure
5.8 points · 1.6%Economy & Small Business
5.5 points · 1.5%Arts, Culture & Community
3.9 points · 1.1%Other smaller areas
3.0 points · 0.8%Individual areas below 1% are grouped here only so the chart stays readable.
- Labor & City Workforce2.9 points · 0.8%
- Budget & Appropriations0.1 points · 0.0%
By year
Annual work
In 2023, 5 sponsored measures were adopted, contributing 18.2 points.
Full annual history · 2015–2026. Points use the measure’s introduction year.
| Year | Points | Sponsored measures adopted |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 18.2 | 5 |
| 2022 | 13.8 | 5 |
| 2021 | 39.1 | 16 |
| 2020 | 42.5 | 28 |
| 2019 | 11.8 | 21 |
| 2018 | 16.1 | 11 |
| 2017 | 53.9 | 31 |
| 2016 | 106.6 | 31 |
| 2015 | 63.9 | 26 |
| Total in available record | 365.8 | 174 |
Year-by-year participation and sponsorship details
| Year | Points | Passed | Pass rate | Original | Co-sponsored | Opposed | Abstained | Attendance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 18.2 | 5 | 83.3 | 5 | 0 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 69.8 |
| 2022 | 13.8 | 5 | 83.3 | 5 | 1 | 10.6 | 0.0 | 83.3 |
| 2021 | 39.1 | 16 | 94.1 | 15 | 7 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 93.5 |
| 2020 | 42.5 | 28 | 96.6 | 27 | 14 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 88.7 |
| 2019 | 11.8 | 21 | 95.5 | 21 | 17 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 87.8 |
| 2018 | 16.1 | 11 | 100.0 | 11 | 4 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 82.0 |
| 2017 | 53.9 | 31 | 100.0 | 31 | 16 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 83.6 |
| 2016 | 106.6 | 31 | 100.0 | 31 | 1 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 76.4 |
| 2015 | 63.9 | 26 | 100.0 | 26 | 8 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 92.0 |
| Total in available record | 365.8 | 174 | 97.2 | 172 | 68 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 84.2 |
Rates are shown only when the relevant official record exists. Vote and attendance measures describe participation; they do not affect points.
Council roles
Committees & positions
12 committee assignments available for recorded service.
- Vice ChairCivil Rights, Utilities, Economic Development, and Arts Committee
- ChairEnergy Committee
- ChairEnergy and Environment Committee
- ChairHuman Services, Equitable Development, and Renter Rights Committee
- Vice ChairNeighborhoods, Education, Civil Rights, and Culture Committee
- Vice ChairPublic Safety, Civil Rights, and Technology Committee
- Vice ChairSeattle Public Utilities and Neighborhoods Committee
- ChairSustainability and Renters' Rights Committee
- Member2023 Select Committee on Climate Action
- AlternateCivic Development, Public Assets, and Native Communities Committee
- MemberCommittee on Central Waterfront, Seawall, and Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Program
- MemberCommittee on Housing Affordability, Human Services, and Economic Resiliency
Point-by-point audit
Contributing bills
174 adopted measures contribute to the full 2015–2026 total. Bills are listed by credited points.
Open filtered explorerRequiring periodic building energy tune-ups for certain nonresidential buildings.CB 118631 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +7.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE requiring periodic building energy tune-ups for certain nonresidential buildings; adding a new Chapter 22.930 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.
Factors [1, 1, 2, 2]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Increasing the tax rates of the payroll expense tax imposed on persons engaging in business in Seattle.CB 119950 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Government Operations & Finance +6.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; increasing the tax rates of the payroll expense tax imposed on persons engaging in business in Seattle; and amending Section 5.38.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $187,200,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requiring the payment of economic displacement relocation assistance to households that are vacating a housing unit after receiving notice of a rent….CB 120173 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & Homelessness +6.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to relocation assistance for economically displaced tenants; requiring the payment of economic displacement relocation assistance to households that are vacating a housing unit after receiving notice of a rent increase of ten percent or more or of less than ten percent where the cumulative effect for the household’s tenancy is ten percent or more; and adding a new Chapter 22.212 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,300,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the City Light Department.CB 118690 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +6.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Section 21.49.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to remove an exception from eligibility to the Utility Discount Program for tenants of federally subsidized housing with utility allowances and to update and modify certain program provisions.
Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,400,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [2, 1, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.058, 21.49.060, 21.49.065, 21.49.081, 21.49.082, 21.49.085, and 21.49.110, and repealing SMC….CB 118802 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +6.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2017 and 2018; amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.058, 21.49.060, 21.49.065, 21.49.081, 21.49.082, 21.49.085, and 21.49.110, and repealing SMC Section 21.49.080, in connection therewith.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $902,100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Changing the operation of the Rate Stabilization Account, and amending Seattle Municipal Code 21.49.086.G.CB 118350 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +6.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; changing the operation of the Rate Stabilization Account, and amending Seattle Municipal Code 21.49.086.G.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $125,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the Seattle Criminal Code, adding a new Chapter 12A.32 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120375 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & Justice +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Criminal Code, adding a new Chapter 12A.32 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 12A.20.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,022. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Regarding the impact of Seattle’s Urban Renewal program in displacing Black community members from the Central Area.Res 32015 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Housing & Homelessness +5.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding the impact of Seattle’s Urban Renewal program in displacing Black community members from the Central Area; supporting community demands to fund quality affordable social housing to prevent and reverse displacement; and urging the Office of Housing to fund the affordable housing project proposed by New Hope Community Development Institute.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $11,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Provides that transitional encampments for homeless individuals are allowed on any property owned or controlled by a religious organization without approval of….CB 119656 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & Development +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; providing that transitional encampments for homeless individuals are allowed on any property owned or controlled by a religious organization without approval of a permit under the Seattle Land Use Code, to permit transitional encampments for homeless individuals as an interim use on all publicly owned or private property within the City of Seattle, and providing for renewal of temporary use permits for transitional encampments as a Type I decision of the Director of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections; amending Sections 23.40.002, 23.42.054, 23.42.056, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.76.032, and 23.84A.038 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Ordinance 124747.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,800,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Declares the City’s 8th and Roy Street property as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility….CB 119034 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring the City’s 8th and Roy Street property as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purpose; authorizing the sale of this property for fair market value through a brokered sale; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department to execute all necessary documents to accomplish such property sale; and authorizing the deposit of the proceeds of the sale in the City Light Fund and allocation of part of the proceeds to the Rate Stabilization Account.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $25,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Directing the Office of Sustainability and Environment to make building energy benchmarking reports and, where available, an energy performance rating available to….CB 118630 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to building energy use benchmarking and reporting; directing the Office of Sustainability and Environment to make building energy benchmarking reports and, where available, an energy performance rating available to the public; amending Sections 22.920.060, 22.920.125, and 22.920.170 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $95,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 2]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending subsection 21.49.086.D of the Seattle Municipal Code to create Net Wholesale Revenue targets for 2017 and 2018 consistent with those assumed….CB 118801 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending subsection 21.49.086.D of the Seattle Municipal Code to create Net Wholesale Revenue targets for 2017 and 2018 consistent with those assumed in the City Light 2017-2022 Strategic Plan adopted by Resolution 31678.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $60,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 2, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, and 21.49.057 in connection therewith.CB 118393 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department; amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, and 21.49.057 in connection therewith; adding an Aurora Avenue North Phase 3A undergrounding charge, applied to all City of Shoreline rate schedules.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,900,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Including protections against discrimination based on an individual’s caste.CB 120511 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Civil Rights & Democracy +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to human rights; including protections against discrimination based on an individual’s caste; making technical amendments; and amending Sections 3.14.910, 3.14.931, 3.110.260, 4.80.020, 5.30.020, 6.02.270, 6.202.230, 14.04.020, 14.04.030, 14.04.040, 14.06.020, 14.06.030, 14.08.015, 14.08.020, 14.08.045, 14.08.070, 14.08.190, 14.10.010, 14.10.020, 14.11.020, and 18.12.280 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Limiting the amount of fees charged for late payment of rent and for notices issued to tenants.CB 120541 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential tenancy; limiting the amount of fees charged for late payment of rent and for notices issued to tenants; and adding a new Section 7.24.034 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $138,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Urging Mayor Durkan and Governor Inslee to extend the City and State emergency moratoriums on evictions through no earlier than the end….Res 31998 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION urging Mayor Durkan and Governor Inslee to extend the City and State emergency moratoriums on evictions through no earlier than the end of 2021.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Provides a defense to certain evictions of children, their families, and educators during the school year.CB 120046 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to termination of residential rental tenancies; providing a defense to certain evictions of children, their families, and educators during the school year; and amending Section 22.206.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requiring a minimum of 180 days' prior written notice to tenants whenever the housing costs to be charged a tenant are to….CB 119585 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential rental properties; requiring a minimum of 180 days' prior written notice to tenants whenever the housing costs to be charged a tenant are to increase; and amending Sections 7.24.030, 22.202.080, and 22.206.180 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Clarifying that a tenant relocation license is required before the removal of a rent or income restriction.CB 120182 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance; clarifying that a tenant relocation license is required before the removal of a rent or income restriction; and amending Sections 22.210.020, 22.210.030, 22.210.040, 22.210.050, 22.210.070, 22.210.080, 22.210.090, 22.210.100, 22.210.110, 22.210.120, 22.210.130, 22.210.136, 22.210.140, and 22.210.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $550,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Prohibiting evictions in winter months.CB 119726 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to termination of residential rental tenancies; prohibiting evictions in winter months; and amending Section 22.206.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Prohibiting the use of chokeholds by officers.CB 119804 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & Justice +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; prohibiting the use of chokeholds by officers; amending Section 12A.04.200 of, and adding a new Section 3.28.145 to, the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons.CB 119805 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & Justice +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates residential rental properties.CB 118993 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential rental properties; amending Sections 7.24.060, 7.24.070 and 7.24.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code; requiring that landlords provide information to tenants about how to register to vote and how to update voter registration information.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2018-2019 and a ten-year conservation potential.Res 31765 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2018-2019 and a ten-year conservation potential.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adding a new Section 21.49.088 to the Seattle Municipal Code to create a utility tax pass through.CB 118563 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department; adding a new Section 21.49.088 to the Seattle Municipal Code to create a utility tax pass through; and amending Sections 21.49.020, 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.081, and 21.49.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code to implement new distinct rates for the city of Lake Forest Park to allow for the potential addition of a utility tax.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2016-2017 and a ten-year conservation potential.Res 31631 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2016-2017 and a ten-year conservation potential.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requiring a schedule for periodic building tune-ups for City-owned facilities and directing the Office of Sustainability & Environment to develop guidelines for….Res 31652 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & Parks +4.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION requiring a schedule for periodic building tune-ups for City-owned facilities and directing the Office of Sustainability & Environment to develop guidelines for energy efficient asset preservation.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Accepts a ten-year franchise authorizing limited use of the public road rights-of-way in Snohomish County, Washington by Seattle City Light to construct….CB 118648 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting a ten-year franchise authorizing limited use of the public road rights-of-way in Snohomish County, Washington by Seattle City Light to construct, maintain, operate, replace, and repair electric power system facilities.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Establishes regulations and enforcement provisions related to residential rent increases on properties that do not meet basic maintenance standards.CB 118678 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to tenant protections; establishing regulations and enforcement provisions related to residential rent increases on properties that do not meet basic maintenance standards; transferring primary enforcement authority for all sections of Title 22, Subtitle 2 of the Seattle Municipal Code (Housing Code) to the Director of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections; amending the penalty structure for certain violations of the Housing Code; amending Sections 22.202.010, 22.202.050, 22.204.090, 22.206.180, 22.206.220, 22.206.280, and 22.206.305 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 22.202.080.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Department to participate in the California Independent System Operator’s Energy Imbalance Market, including authorizing the execution of any necessary agreements….CB 118798 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Department to participate in the California Independent System Operator’s Energy Imbalance Market, including authorizing the execution of any necessary agreements with the California Independent System Operator, as well as any additional agreements necessary or convenient for implementation and participation in the California Independent System Operator’s Energy Imbalance Market.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates residential rental properties.CB 118817 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential rental properties; amending Sections 7.24.020, 7.24.030, 7.24.040, 7.24.050, 7.24.060, 7.24.070, and 7.24.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); adding new Sections 7.24.035, 7.24.036, 7.24.038, 7.24.110, 7.24.120, 7.24.130, 7.24.140, 7.24.150, 7.24.160, 7.24.170, 7.24.180, 7.24.190, 7.24.200, and 7.24.210 to the SMC; and repealing Section 7.24.090 of the SMC; all to limit the amount of security deposits and non-refundable move-in fees, to allow residential tenants to pay security deposits, non-refundable move-in fees, and last month’s rent in installments, and to establish enforcement provisions for Chapter 7.24.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the rates, terms and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department to customers in….CB 118443 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the rates, terms and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department to customers in the city of SeaTac; and amending Sections 21.49.020, 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.081, and 21.49.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code to implement new rates for the city of SeaTac that reflect the terms of the 2015 franchise agreement.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $112,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the City Light Department.CB 118479 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; and amending Section 21.49.042 of the Seattle Municipal code to align income eligibility guidelines for the utility-funded Emergency Low-Income Assistance program with other city rate assistance programs and allow year-round program operation.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $30,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Supports a long-term ceasefire in Israel and occupied Palestine, the return of all hostages, and the delivery of humanitarian aid.Res 32118 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting a long-term ceasefire in Israel and occupied Palestine, the return of all hostages, and the delivery of humanitarian aid; and affirming opposition to Antisemitism and Islamophobia.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Expressing the Seattle City Council’s support for workers at Starbucks in Seattle who are attempting to form a union, and urging Starbucks….Res 32041 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the Seattle City Council’s support for workers at Starbucks in Seattle who are attempting to form a union, and urging Starbucks to accept card check neutrality.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
In support of abortion rights and other reproductive rights, in opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion in Dobbs v.….Res 32054 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Public Safety & Justice +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of abortion rights and other reproductive rights, in opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization; and urging state and federal elected officials to codify abortion rights and other reproductive rights.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Prioritizing people over the profits of pharmaceutical companies.Res 32004 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Health & Human Services +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION prioritizing people over the profits of pharmaceutical companies; supporting the production of COVID-19 vaccine around the world; urging President Biden to end U.S. opposition to the Waiver from Certain Provisions of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement for the Prevention, Containment and Treatment of COVID-19 at the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 9, 2019 through December 13, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119728 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 9, 2019 through December 13, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 16, 2019 through December 20, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119729 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 16, 2019 through December 20, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain in audited claims for the week of December 23, 2019 through December 27, 2019 and ordering the….CB 119733 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain in audited claims for the week of December 23, 2019 through December 27, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
In support of the youth-led September 20, 2019 Global Climate Strike.Res 31907 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & Parks +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of the youth-led September 20, 2019 Global Climate Strike; urging Seattle Public Schools to support its students’ right to assemble and participate in the Global Climate Strike; and affirming that City employees may request unpaid leave for a day of conscience on September 20, 2019.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to appropriations for the Human Services Department.CB 119245 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Health & Human Services +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to appropriations for the Human Services Department; amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 budget; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $90,960. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Swan property in King County, Washington, the Bettys Family Trust, Bettys Trust, Crossman, Farm and Fowl….CB 118901 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting statutory warranty deeds to the Swan property in King County, Washington, the Bettys Family Trust, Bettys Trust, Crossman, Farm and Fowl, LLC, Frol, James, Jones, Learned’s Little Houses, LLC, Nelson, Trowbridge, and Weatherburn properties in Skagit County, Washington, and the Watkins et al. property in Snohomish County, Washington; accepting a quit claim deed to Skagit Land Trust properties in Skagit County, for salmonid habitat protection purposes; declaring certain real property rights surplus and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purposes; ratifying the grants of Deeds of Right to the State of Washington on the Bettys Family Trust, Bettys Trust, Crossman, Frol, Jones, Nelson, and Watkins et al. properties for salmon recovery and conservation purposes; placing said lands under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $503,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Stating the Seattle City Council’s opposition to the Keystone XL Pipeline, and requesting the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to investigate….Res 31740 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION stating the Seattle City Council’s opposition to the Keystone XL Pipeline, and requesting the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to investigate ways to establish contracting criteria to prioritize the City’s goals to avoid contracting with financial institutions that provide it with project-level loans or other financial services.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Declares as surplus certain real property interests in Block 1, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to The City of Seattle.CB 118954 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring as surplus certain real property interests in Block 1, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to The City of Seattle; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department to grant a utility easement to King County; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $55,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Declares certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department.CB 119056 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department; authorizing the partial release of a City Light easement; and accepting the payment of fair market value for the partial release of easement.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $31,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 119058 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to grant a revised easement for access purposes over a portion of the City’s….CB 119076 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to grant a revised easement for access purposes over a portion of the City’s fee-owned real property in the vicinity of East Marginal Way South and Duwamish Avenue South to JMDH Real Estate of Seattle, LLC; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Expressing the Seattle City Council’s support for a single-payer healthcare system (“Medicare for All”), supporting United States Senate Bill 1804, and requesting….Res 31774 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the Seattle City Council’s support for a single-payer healthcare system (“Medicare for All”), supporting United States Senate Bill 1804, and requesting the support of Washington’s U.S. Senators.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Urging the President of the United States and the United States Congress to enact legislation securing the citizenship of internationally adopted adult….Res 31781 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION urging the President of the United States and the United States Congress to enact legislation securing the citizenship of internationally adopted adult individuals.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 119162 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Citipoint Church, GKI Properties, LLC, the Martin, Nelson, Taylor, and Voegtlin-Anderson properties in Skagit County, Washington….CB 119163 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting statutory warranty deeds to the Citipoint Church, GKI Properties, LLC, the Martin, Nelson, Taylor, and Voegtlin-Anderson properties in Skagit County, Washington, the Crawley and Wright properties in Snohomish County, Washington, and a treasurer’s deed for a Skagit County property in Skagit County, all for salmonid habitat protection purposes; declaring certain real property rights surplus and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purposes; ratifying the grants of Deeds of Right to the State of Washington on the Crawley, GKI Properties, LLC, and Voegtlin-Anderson properties for salmon recovery and conservation purposes; placing said lands under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $343,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Cargile, Delay, Edwards, Jacobs, King-Smith, Lonesome Valley L. L. C., Macomber, Russell, Watson, and Wolf properties….CB 118607 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting statutory warranty deeds to the Cargile, Delay, Edwards, Jacobs, King-Smith, Lonesome Valley L. L. C., Macomber, Russell, Watson, and Wolf properties in Skagit County, Washington, and the Jarvis and Mitchell, et al., properties in Snohomish County, for salmonid habitat protection purposes; declaring certain real property rights surplus and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purpose; ratifying a Boundary Line Agreement for the Anderson Creek property in Skagit County, Washington for salmon habitat protection purposes; ratifying the grants of Deeds of Right to the State of Washington on the Cargile, Delay, Edwards, Jarvis, King-Smith, Lonesome Valley L. L. C., Mitchell et al., and Watson properties for salmon recovery and conservation purposes; placing said lands under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $710,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Stating The City of Seattle’s support for clean and safe electricity production and opposition to the use of fossil fuels and new….Res 31667 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION stating The City of Seattle’s support for clean and safe electricity production and opposition to the use of fossil fuels and new nuclear energy in the generation of electricity, and requiring an ongoing evaluation of existing nuclear power generation on the basis of health, safety, reliability, and cost; and instructing that The City of Seattle’s City Light Department reflect this position in its policies and interactions with other utilities, federal and state agencies, and organizations of which it is a member or participant.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to negotiate for and purchase parcels of land and acquire other real property rights….CB 118708 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to negotiate for and purchase parcels of land and acquire other real property rights in accordance with the federal license for the City’s Boundary Hydroelectric Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts a 2017-2022 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing a six-year rate path required to support the Strategic Plan.Res 31678 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; adopting a 2017-2022 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing a six-year rate path required to support the Strategic Plan.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into a lease agreement with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources….CB 118720 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into a lease agreement with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for use of the Gold Mountain communications facility in Kitsap County, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $19,897. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Declares the former University Substation property as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility service or….CB 118709 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring the former University Substation property as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purpose; authorizing the sale of this property for appraised value to the University of Washington, or to be sold through a brokered sale managed by the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department or designee to execute all necessary documents to accomplish such property sale, and to deposit the proceeds of the sale in the City Light Fund.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $621,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to the City Light Department.CB 118741 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City Light Department; accepting certain easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Accepts certain easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 118742 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting certain easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.CB 118743 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to grant a permanent flowage easement to allow for a relocated portion of Cumberland Creek to occasionally flood conservation land owned by The City of Seattle in Skagit County, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into a five-party Reciprocal Easement Agreement with ELA, LLC.CB 118744 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department, declaring certain real property rights surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into a five-party Reciprocal Easement Agreement with ELA, LLC; Echo Lake Senior Apartments; The Young Men’s Christian Association of Greater Seattle; and the Ronald Wastewater District; authorizing the conveyance and acceptance of easements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Acknowledging the 2016 Integrated Resource Plan for future energy efficiency and power resources needed to provide reliable, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible electric….Res 31684 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging the 2016 Integrated Resource Plan for future energy efficiency and power resources needed to provide reliable, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible electric power to the citizens of Seattle as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle and the requirements of the State of Washington; and approving the plan for the biennium September 2016 through August 2018.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Supports Washington Initiative Measure 735, and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 735 on the November 8, 2016, general election….Res 31715 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Washington Initiative Measure 735, and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 735 on the November 8, 2016, general election ballot.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Declares certain real property in Section 16, Township 27 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in Snohomish County, Washington, surplus to utility needs.CB 118799 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property in Section 16, Township 27 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in Snohomish County, Washington, surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement between The City of Seattle and Lennar Northwest, Inc. (“Lennar”) for the conveyance of said property to Snohomish County; accepting payment for the true and full value of said property from Lennar; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $163,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to the City Light Department.CB 118800 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City Light Department; authorizing and directing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the Kalispel Tribe of Indians.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Declares as surplus and authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department to partially release three easements….CB 118879 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring as surplus and authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department to partially release three easements for electrical service in King County, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Establishes a 5-year budget review process and approving the proposed budget framework of the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission for its fiscal years….Res 31568 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & Parks +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a 5-year budget review process and approving the proposed budget framework of the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission for its fiscal years 2015 through 2018.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $130,597. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Ordinance 123256 to clarify the role of and support for the City Light Review Panel.CB 118330 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Ordinance 123256 to clarify the role of and support for the City Light Review Panel.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 118351 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 118352 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Grants authority to accept and execute revenue and funding source agreements to support the operation and services of the Lighting Design Lab.CB 118399 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; granting authority to accept and execute revenue and funding source agreements to support the operation and services of the Lighting Design Lab; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Approves a 15-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system in, across, over, along, under….CB 118425 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; approving a 15-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system in, across, over, along, under, through, and below certain designated public rights-of-way in the City of Lake Forest Park.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Declares certain real property rights and improvements surplus to the City of Seattle’s utility needs.CB 118424 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & Development +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights and improvements surplus to the City of Seattle’s utility needs; and authorizing the release of an access easement and a permit for a groundwater observation well, and the conveyance of ownership of said groundwater well to James and Valerie Van Dyke in Pend Oreille County, Washington.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the execution of the Maintenance Obligations and Ownership Agreement for Boundary Substation with the Bonneville Power Administration.CB 118441 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the execution of the Maintenance Obligations and Ownership Agreement for Boundary Substation with the Bonneville Power Administration; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the City Light Department, approving a 15-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system….CB 118445 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department, approving a 15-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system in, across, over, along, under, through, and below certain designated public rights-of-way in the City of SeaTac.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to the City Light Department.CB 118444 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute a Reliability Coordinator Funding Agreement with Peak Reliability, Inc.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Endorses the City Light Department’s Wholesale Energy Risk Management policy governing wholesale energy, transmission, ancillary services, renewable energy credit, and greenhouse gas….Res 31616 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; endorsing the City Light Department’s Wholesale Energy Risk Management policy governing wholesale energy, transmission, ancillary services, renewable energy credit, and greenhouse gas offset trading, and their risk management; establishing it as the policy governing the conduct of wholesale energy, renewable energy credit, and greenhouse gas offset risk management at the City Light Department; and superseding Resolutions 31467 and 31216.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light, or his or her designee, to execute the Amended and Restated….CB 118514 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light, or his or her designee, to execute the Amended and Restated Agreement Limiting Liability Among Western Interconnected Electrical Systems, which enables City Light to manage and resolve inter-utility incidents with members of the Western Interconnected Electrical System and fosters the City Light Department’s customer relations and participation in important regional programs; and further authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light, or his or her designee, to execute amendments to such agreement that are consistent with the intent and authority set forth in this ordinance.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Supports American Indian and Alaskan Native communities’ efforts in calling on the United States Congress to commission a study and report on….Res 31621 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & Community +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the acknowledgment of the various harms and ongoing historical and inter-generational traumas impacting American Indian, First Nations, and Alaskan Natives for the forcible removal of Indian children and subsequent abuse and neglect resulting from the United States’ American Indian Boarding School Policy during the 19th & 20th Centuries; supporting American Indian and Alaskan Native communities’ efforts in calling on the United States Congress to commission a study and report on the United States’ responsibility and role in adopting and implementing an American Indian Boarding School Policy; and committing to work with the local American Indian and Alaskan Natives in efforts of reconciliation in addressing the impacts of historical trauma, language and cultural loss, and alleged genocide.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Imposes an income tax on high-income residents.CB 119002 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & Infrastructure +2.8 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE imposing an income tax on high-income residents; providing solutions for lowering the property tax burden and the impact of other regressive taxes, replacing federal funding potentially lost through federal budget cuts, providing public services, including housing, education, and transit, and creating green jobs and meeting carbon reduction goals; and adding a new Chapter 5.65 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $125,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Guaranteeing the right to legal counsel regardless of ability to pay for any residential renter in Seattle responding to an unlawful detainer….CB 120007 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & Homelessness +2.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential evictions; guaranteeing the right to legal counsel regardless of ability to pay for any residential renter in Seattle responding to an unlawful detainer suit; and adding a new Section 22.206.195 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $750,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Giving a tenant a right of first refusal of a new tenancy after the expiration of a tenancy for a specified time.CB 120090 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & Homelessness +2.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to new residential rental tenancies; giving a tenant a right of first refusal of a new tenancy after the expiration of a tenancy for a specified time; requiring a landlord to have just cause for declining to give a tenant the right of first refusal; requiring notice in advance of asserting just cause; creating a private right for action for the tenant; providing a defense to eviction when a landlord fails to give a tenant a right of first refusal; allowing a tenant to rescind a termination agreement; and amending Sections 7.24.030, 14.08.050, and 22.206.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinance 126006, on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval….CB 119797 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & Development +2.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; extending for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinance 126006, on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of any application to establish a new principal or accessory use, or change a principal or accessory use, for any site currently used as a mobile home park, as defined in Section 23.84A.032 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of applications for development in areas currently used as mobile home parks.CB 119451 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +2.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adopting a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of applications for development in areas currently used as mobile home parks; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Chapter 25.24 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adopt an interim boundary expansion for the Pike Place Market Historical District.CB 119330 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & Development +2.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Pike Place Market Historical District; amending Chapter 25.24 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adopt an interim boundary expansion for the Pike Place Market Historical District.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Affirming The City of Seattle’s support for its local Iranian-American and Iranian-immigrant communities, recognizing the importance of people-to-people diplomacy at the local….Res 31925 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Civil Rights & Democracy +2.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming The City of Seattle’s support for its local Iranian-American and Iranian-immigrant communities, recognizing the importance of people-to-people diplomacy at the local level, calling for a de-escalation in the conflict and damaging rhetoric between the U.S. and Iran and an end to the attacks on the democratic rights of people with Iranian heritage in Washington State and requesting the Office of Intergovernmental Relations communicate these positions to the Washington State congressional delegation.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Reaffirming Seattle as a welcoming city, expressing the Seattle City Council’s solidarity with Seattle’s South Asian community regardless of religion and caste….Res 31926 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & Finance +2.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming Seattle as a welcoming city, expressing the Seattle City Council’s solidarity with Seattle’s South Asian community regardless of religion and caste, and opposing India’s National Register of Citizens and Citizenship Amendment Act.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that SDOT develop a plan to make all public transit in Seattle free to ride.SLI SDOT-15-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & Infrastructure +2.0 pts
Official titleRequest that SDOT develop a plan to make all public transit in Seattle free to ride
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that OED form a search committee to provide recommendations for hiring a Creative Industry Director.SLI OED-15-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small Business +2.0 pts
Official titleRequest that OED form a search committee to provide recommendations for hiring a Creative Industry Director
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requests that the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, the Seattle Fire Department, and the City Budget Office include in the City’s….Res 31831 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Labor & City Workforce +2.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting that the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, the Seattle Fire Department, and the City Budget Office include in the City’s contract for Basic Life Support Emergency Services provisions that provide to emergency medical technicians (EMTs) a prevailing wage and benefits comparable to other emergency workers employed in comparable cities and similar sectors in the City of Seattle; and requesting the departments to provide additional analysis, data, and information.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that FAS submit a business plan for a municipal bank.SLI 12-6-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Economy & Small Business +2.0 pts
Official titleRequest that FAS submit a business plan for a municipal bank
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that the Office of the Mayor submit a report on fixed-mobile Community Health Engagement Location (CHEL) site selection.SLI 14-2-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Health & Human Services +2.0 pts
Official titleRequest that the Office of the Mayor submit a report on fixed-mobile Community Health Engagement Location (CHEL) site selection
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that OCR submit a report of the results of its review of authority and resources to more effectively investigate complaints of….SLI 21-2-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Civil Rights & Democracy +2.0 pts
Official titleRequest that OCR submit a report of the results of its review of authority and resources to more effectively investigate complaints of workplace harassment and discrimination City-wide
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Proclaiming May Day, May 1, 2017 to be a day of action for worker, immigrant, and refugee rights.Res 31745 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & Democracy +2.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION proclaiming May Day, May 1, 2017 to be a day of action for worker, immigrant, and refugee rights; affirming that City employees may request unpaid leave for a day of conscience on May 1, 2017, and requesting that City Departments communicate to City employees the benefits conferred by state law for religious and conscientious leave for state and local government employees.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Urging the authorities in the Mexican federal government and the state of Guerrero to release Nestora Salgado, and requesting that the U.S.….Res 31651 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & Democracy +2.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION urging the authorities in the Mexican federal government and the state of Guerrero to release Nestora Salgado, and requesting that the U.S. State Department increase its efforts to secure her release in its diplomatic discussions with Mexico.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Addressing a proposed liquefied natural gas facility in Tacoma, and urging the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to improve tribal consultation procedures….Res 31793 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & Democracy +1.8 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION addressing a proposed liquefied natural gas facility in Tacoma, and urging the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to improve tribal consultation procedures and collaborate with regional mayors, leaders, and tribes to address the growing impact of climate change.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates just cause eviction: changing the terms of certain eviction defenses.CB 120330 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Housing & Homelessness +1.6 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to just cause eviction: changing the terms of certain eviction defenses; and amending Sections 22.205.090 and 22.205.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Provides a defense to eviction for rent due during the City’s COVID-19 civil emergency.CB 120077 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & Homelessness +1.6 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the termination of residential rental tenancies; providing a defense to eviction for rent due during the City’s COVID-19 civil emergency; and amending Section 22.206.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Regulates the use of eviction history in residential housing.CB 119787 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & Homelessness +1.6 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the use of eviction records; regulating the use of eviction history in residential housing; prohibiting landlords from considering evictions related to COVID-19 during and after the civil emergency; amending the title of Chapter 14.09 and Sections 14.09.005, 14.09.010, 14.09.020, and 14.09.030 of, and adding a new Section 14.09.026 to, the Seattle Municipal Code; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that SCL report on new sources of green power.SLI SCL-301-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Utilities & Technology +1.2 pts
Official titleRequest that SCL report on new sources of green power
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that SCL report on new sources of green power.SLI SCL-301-A-002-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Utilities & Technology +1.2 pts
Official titleRequest that SCL report on new sources of green power
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Calling for U.S.-Cuban collaboration to save lives in the fight against COVID-19.Res 31984 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Health & Human Services +1.2 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for U.S.-Cuban collaboration to save lives in the fight against COVID-19.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that HSD carry forward unspent funding for senior congregate meal programs to 2021.SLI HSD-002-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Health & Human Services +1.2 pts
Official titleRequest that HSD carry forward unspent funding for senior congregate meal programs to 2021
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Report by SDCI on transferable rental histories.SLI SDCI-005-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Housing & Homelessness +1.2 pts
Official titleReport by SDCI on transferable rental histories
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Report by SDCI on standard residential lease terms.SLI SDCI-006-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Land Use & Development +1.2 pts
Official titleReport by SDCI on standard residential lease terms
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request SPR to design and place signage at Licton Springs.SLI SPR-005-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & Parks +1.2 pts
Official titleRequest SPR to design and place signage at Licton Springs
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Expressing the Seattle City Council’s solidarity with farmers protesting the passage of farming bills in India and in support of affected members….Res 31983 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & Finance +1.2 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the Seattle City Council’s solidarity with farmers protesting the passage of farming bills in India and in support of affected members of Seattle’s South Asian community.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Affirming the Seattle City Council’s commitment to high quality locally produced broadcast news to effectively inform the public in the case of….Res 31673 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & Finance +1.2 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming the Seattle City Council’s commitment to high quality locally produced broadcast news to effectively inform the public in the case of emergencies.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Expressing the Seattle City Council's opposition to the current form of Trade Promotion Authority (“Fast Track”), strong concerns about draft elements of….Res 31573 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & Parks +1.2 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the Seattle City Council's opposition to the current form of Trade Promotion Authority (“Fast Track”), strong concerns about draft elements of the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), and support of fair trade practices and agreements that protect American jobs, protect workers, protect the environment, improve the quality of life in all signatory countries, maintain the integrity and sovereignty of our judicial system, and not give multinational corporations power to undermine national and local governmental authority to create reasonable rules and regulations.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to the City Light Department and the Department of Parks and Recreation.CB 118912 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & Parks +1.0 pt
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City Light Department and the Department of Parks and Recreation; superseding Section 7 of Ordinance 124917 and transferring jurisdiction of the former Delridge Substation from the City Light Department to the Department of Parks and Recreation for open space, park and recreation purposes.
Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $80,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 0]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.CB 118513 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +1.0 pt
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to execute an agreement for the City to grant an easement for access purposes over a portion of the City’s fee-owned transmission corridor at 14355 Linden Avenue North in Seattle, Washington, and to accept the release of an easement at said address; accepting payment for the true and full value of the easement being granted from Rise Properties (Woodland Pointe) Limited Partnership; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $23,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 0]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.CB 118423 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +1.0 pt
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to execute an agreement for the City to grant an easement for parking and access purposes over a portion of the City’s fee-owned Bothell-Canal Transmission Corridor at 17524 Aurora Avenue North in the City of Shoreline, Washington; accepting payment for the true and full value of the easement from GCW Shoreline, LLC, and WG @ Shoreline, LLC; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $525,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 0]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adding Chapter 20.46 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118905 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Economy & Small Business +0.8 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to strengthening The City of Seattle’s policies for conducting City business with partners that are committed to fair business practices; adding Chapter 20.46 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending the revised City of Seattle Investment Policies adopted by Resolution 31525; and requesting the Mayor and Director of Finance and Administrative Services to take certain actions, including not renewing the Contract for Bank Depository Services with Wells Fargo Bank beyond the initial term and refraining from making new investments in Wells Fargo securities for a period of three years.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
OH Monitoring Program for Un-subsidized Rental Housing in Seattle.SLI 28-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Housing & Homelessness +0.7 pts
Official titleOH Monitoring Program for Un-subsidized Rental Housing in Seattle
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Evaluate feasibility of developing an LGBTQ Community Center.SLI 66-1-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & Community +0.7 pts
Official titleEvaluate feasibility of developing an LGBTQ Community Center
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Commercial Rent Control.SLI 149-1-A-3-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Housing & Homelessness +0.7 pts
Official titleCommercial Rent Control
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
DPD report to Council on (1) potential fee increases for the RRIO program to support an inspection auditing program and (2) a….SLI 25-2-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Housing & Homelessness +0.7 pts
Official titleDPD report to Council on (1) potential fee increases for the RRIO program to support an inspection auditing program and (2) a data collection plan on the value of repairs resulting from RRIO.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requests Congress to allocate funding to adequately address the maintenance needs of the National Park System.Res 31737 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.7 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting Congress to allocate funding to adequately address the maintenance needs of the National Park System.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $510,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to meet or exceed goals established in the Paris Agreement.Res 31757 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.6 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Office of Sustainability and Environment; affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to meet or exceed goals established in the Paris Agreement.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120096 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Health & Human Services +0.5 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Human Services Department; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; modifying a proviso imposed by Ordinance 126298; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to imposing a tax on engaging in the business of making retail sales of firearms and ammunition.CB 118437 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Economy & Small Business +0.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to imposing a tax on engaging in the business of making retail sales of firearms and ammunition; amending Sections 5.30.010, 5.30.060, 5.55.010, 5.55.040, 5.55.060, 5.55.150, 5.55.165, 5.55.220, and 5.55.230 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 5.50 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $177,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that MO provide recommendations regarding creating a chief arborist position.SLI MO-001-A-002-2022 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.4 pts
Official titleRequest that MO provide recommendations regarding creating a chief arborist position
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Transportation Management Plan monitoring and enforcement fee proposal.SLI 57-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.4 pts
Official titleTransportation Management Plan monitoring and enforcement fee proposal
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
SPD Training Report.SLI 206-1-B-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & Justice +0.4 pts
Official titleSPD Training Report
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Reaffirming Seattle’s commitment to the Climate Action Plan and setting expectations for increasing commercial building energy efficiency through the year 2035.Res 31714 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.4 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming Seattle’s commitment to the Climate Action Plan and setting expectations for increasing commercial building energy efficiency through the year 2035.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requiring the reporting of lost and stolen firearms.CB 118436 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & Justice +0.3 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE requiring the reporting of lost and stolen firearms; and creating a new Chapter 10.78 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $181,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Establishes minimum labor and compensation standards for transportation network company drivers.CB 119876 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City Workforce +0.3 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to transportation network company driver labor standards; establishing minimum labor and compensation standards for transportation network company drivers; establishing provision of or reimbursement for personal protective equipment to transportation network company drivers during the civil emergency declared on March 3, 2020; establishing notice, posting, and data requirements for transportation network companies; prescribing remedies and enforcement procedures; amending Section 3.15.000 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending the title of Chapter 14.31 and Sections 6.208.020 and 14.31.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 14.33 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $505,546. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Establishes spending details by year and program area for the spending plan adopted by the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119811 that….Res 31957 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & Finance +0.3 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing spending details by year and program area for the spending plan adopted by the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119811 that established the authorized uses of the proceeds generated from the payroll expense tax authorized by the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119810.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $214,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Named in honor of MiChance Dunlap-Gittens and relating to the Seattle Police Department.CB 119840 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & Justice +0.3 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE named in honor of MiChance Dunlap-Gittens and relating to the Seattle Police Department; prohibiting law enforcement officers from questioning, except in limited circumstances, persons 18 years of age or younger where a Miranda warning is administered unless legal counsel is provided; prohibiting law enforcement officers from requesting permission from a person under 18 years of age to conduct a search of the person or property, dwellings, or vehicles under that person’s control unless legal counsel is provided for that person; and adding a new Section 3.28.147 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates City employment.CB 118910 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City Workforce +0.3 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; amending Sections 4.20.055, 4.26.010, 4.27.010, 4.27.020, and 4.27.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adding a new Chapter 4.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code, consisting of Sections 4.29.010, 4.29.020, 4.29.030, 4.29.040, 4.29.050, 4.29.060, 4.29.070, 4.29.080, 4.29.090, and 4.29.100, all to provide additional Paid Parental Leave and a new Paid Family Care Leave benefit to eligible city employees; establishing other conditions of implementing the new leave benefits; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,600,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that the Executive participate in a work group regarding implementation of the 2019 Racial Equity Toolkit (RET) report.SLI OCR-002-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Civil Rights & Democracy +0.3 pts
Official titleRequest that the Executive participate in a work group regarding implementation of the 2019 Racial Equity Toolkit (RET) report
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Report by SDCI and OH on Mandatory Housing Affordability Program production.SLI SDCI-010-B-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Housing & Homelessness +0.3 pts
Official titleReport by SDCI and OH on Mandatory Housing Affordability Program production
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
CBO report on feasibility of issuing bonds for affordable housing and Equitable Development Initiative (EDI).SLI 1-3-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & Homelessness +0.3 pts
Official titleCBO report on feasibility of issuing bonds for affordable housing and Equitable Development Initiative (EDI)
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that ARTS, DON, DPR, and OIR participate in creation of principles to review of memorials, plaques, and artwork on City-owned land….SLI 2-4-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Arts, Culture & Community +0.3 pts
Official titleRequest that ARTS, DON, DPR, and OIR participate in creation of principles to review of memorials, plaques, and artwork on City-owned land referencing, honoring, or displaying Native American culture
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Report on including K-12 education programs funded by the Sweetened Beverage Tax in future Families and Education Levy.SLI 163-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Health & Human Services +0.3 pts
Official titleReport on including K-12 education programs funded by the Sweetened Beverage Tax in future Families and Education Levy
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Create and outline an inclusive role of Boards and Commissions in the City Council Budget Review Process.SLI 296-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +0.3 pts
Official titleCreate and outline an inclusive role of Boards and Commissions in the City Council Budget Review Process
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requests the Executive identify policy direction, steps forward and sources of funding for a viable, privately operated childcare facility on the City's….SLI 76-2-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Health & Human Services +0.3 pts
Official titleRequesting the Executive identify policy direction, steps forward and sources of funding for a viable, privately operated childcare facility on the City's downtown Civic Center campus
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Establishes labor standards requirements for additional compensation for grocery employees working in Seattle.CB 119990 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City Workforce +0.2 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; establishing labor standards requirements for additional compensation for grocery employees working in Seattle; amending Sections 3.02.125 and 6.208.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,021. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that funding decisions for OH's Fall 2021 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) recognize 2022 affordable housing appropriations and request that OH….SLI OH-010-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Housing & Homelessness +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that funding decisions for OH's Fall 2021 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) recognize 2022 affordable housing appropriations and request that OH recommend modifications to the Housing Funding Policies
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that SPD report on its data collection and management practices for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG) cases.SLI SPD-002-A-001-2022 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Civil Rights & Democracy +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that SPD report on its data collection and management practices for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG) cases
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that DON report on long-term funding opportunities to preserve and enhance P-Patches.SLI DON-4-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that DON report on long-term funding opportunities to preserve and enhance P-Patches
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that DEEL assess the feasibility of implementing the Washington State Opportunity Scholarship program in Seattle and report on progress.SLI DEEL-8-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that DEEL assess the feasibility of implementing the Washington State Opportunity Scholarship program in Seattle and report on progress
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that DON report on a strategy to develop a community-led place-based violence prevention initiative in Westwood and South Delridge.SLI DON-5-B-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that DON report on a strategy to develop a community-led place-based violence prevention initiative in Westwood and South Delridge
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that HSD provide guidelines for homelessness service provision to the LGBTQ community.SLI 15-17-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & Homelessness +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that HSD provide guidelines for homelessness service provision to the LGBTQ community
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
SFD and SPD report on building first responder partnerships with social and health service providers or other resources.SLI 195-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & Justice +0.2 pts
Official titleSFD and SPD report on building first responder partnerships with social and health service providers or other resources
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Speed and Reliability recommendations for the South Lake Union and First Hill streetcar lines.SLI 55-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.2 pts
Official titleSpeed and Reliability recommendations for the South Lake Union and First Hill streetcar lines
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
SPD Overtime Overexpenditure Workgroup.SLI 203-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & Justice +0.2 pts
Official titleSPD Overtime Overexpenditure Workgroup
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
SDOT and OSE food access pilot.SLI 31-1-B-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.2 pts
Official titleSDOT and OSE food access pilot
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
SPD Report on Overtime Policy Implementation.SLI 202-1-A-3-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & Justice +0.2 pts
Official titleSPD Report on Overtime Policy Implementation
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Report by HSD and SDHR on disparities between internal and contracted human service provider wages.SLI 281-1-B-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Health & Human Services +0.2 pts
Official titleReport by HSD and SDHR on disparities between internal and contracted human service provider wages
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that FAS report on potential space for a food bank in Belltown.SLI FAS-001-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Health & Human Services +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that FAS report on potential space for a food bank in Belltown
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that the Executive recommend strategies for consolidating urban forestry functions.SLI MO-001-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that the Executive recommend strategies for consolidating urban forestry functions
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request a report on sites for a tiny home village.SLI HOM-4-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Housing & Homelessness +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest a report on sites for a tiny home village
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that HSD report on contracts with American Indian and Alaska Native organizations.SLI HSD-1-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that HSD report on contracts with American Indian and Alaska Native organizations
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request to CBO for legislation creating a Sweetened Beverage Tax fund and a Short-Term Rental tax fund and establishing spending guidance.SLI 1-5-B-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & Homelessness +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest to CBO for legislation creating a Sweetened Beverage Tax fund and a Short-Term Rental tax fund and establishing spending guidance
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) expansion.SLI 260-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & Justice +0.2 pts
Official titleLaw Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) expansion
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request a new Internet for All section in the 2021 Adopted Budget Book.SLI CBO-001-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Budget & Appropriations +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest a new Internet for All section in the 2021 Adopted Budget Book
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that HSD provide a report on demand and costs for citywide diversion program by August 2, 2021.SLI HSD-006-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Health & Human Services +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that HSD provide a report on demand and costs for citywide diversion program by August 2, 2021
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that OCR spend a portion of its $1 million in its 2020 Proposed Budget on community-based organizations to create restorative justice….SLI CJ-6-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Civil Rights & Democracy +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OCR spend a portion of its $1 million in its 2020 Proposed Budget on community-based organizations to create restorative justice approaches to individuals committing hate crimes
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that Seattle Municipal Court report back to Council on how it would implement high-barrier probation.SLI CJ-7-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that Seattle Municipal Court report back to Council on how it would implement high-barrier probation
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that Executive departments report on reentry recommendations regarding increasing economic opportunities.SLI CJ-21-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that Executive departments report on reentry recommendations regarding increasing economic opportunities
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that SPD develop a reporting mechanism that accurately captures race data.SLI CJ-26-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that SPD develop a reporting mechanism that accurately captures race data
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that DEEL conduct stakeholder engagement and report on including labor harmony language in Child Care Assistance Program contracts.SLI DEEL-1-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that DEEL conduct stakeholder engagement and report on including labor harmony language in Child Care Assistance Program contracts
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that SDOT report on current maintenance spending for bicycle infrastructure.SLI SDOT-2-C-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that SDOT report on current maintenance spending for bicycle infrastructure
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request the City Auditor conduct a review of Seattle Municipal Court's probation program.SLI CJ-1-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest the City Auditor conduct a review of Seattle Municipal Court's probation program
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that OED develop strategies to support farmers markets.SLI OED-002-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Economy & Small Business +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OED develop strategies to support farmers markets
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request SPD to provide the reports requested in Ordinance 126148 and Resolution 31962.SLI SPD-001-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest SPD to provide the reports requested in Ordinance 126148 and Resolution 31962
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request SPD to report on traffic stops.SLI SPD-004-B-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest SPD to report on traffic stops
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that LAW report on expanding prefiling diversion opportunities to those over age 25.SLI CJ-24-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that LAW report on expanding prefiling diversion opportunities to those over age 25
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request a report from HSD on subsidizing transit passes for employees of HSD contracted service providers.SLI HSD-5-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest a report from HSD on subsidizing transit passes for employees of HSD contracted service providers
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that OED provide recommendations regarding the creation of a film commission.SLI OED-10-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small Business +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OED provide recommendations regarding the creation of a film commission
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request SCL to report on SCL Strategic Planning in accordance with Seattle's Green New Deal Resolution (RES 31895).SLI SCL-2-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Utilities & Technology +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest SCL to report on SCL Strategic Planning in accordance with Seattle's Green New Deal Resolution (RES 31895)
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that OED create strategies to connect developers with small businesses and service providers.SLI OED-2-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small Business +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OED create strategies to connect developers with small businesses and service providers
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional