100.0% passage rate
Representation unavailable
Bruce Harrell
Former councilmember · 2012–2019
Total in available record · LegisRate points
453.92015–2026 records · source checked Oct 8, 2026
173 sponsored measures adopted in the available record.
Service: 2012–2019. Coverage is limited to 2015–2026.
How scoring worksOverview and record
Background and tenure
Former councilmember · recorded terms: 2012–2019. The legislative record shown here covers 2015–2026.
Bruce Harrell is an attorney and politician who served on the Seattle City Council from 2008 to 2020, including as council president, before becoming mayor. Raised in Seattle, he played college football at the University of Washington and worked as an attorney before entering office. His council work included public safety, broadband access, employment policy, and city utilities; he also served briefly as acting mayor in 2017 and was elected mayor in 2021.
Harrell served on the council from 2008 to 2020, first in a citywide position and then District 2, and was council president from 2016 to 2020. His work included public safety, broadband access, employment policy, utilities, and a brief period as acting mayor in 2017.
Background summary adapted from Wikipedia; it is separate from the LegisRate record and score.
Full available record · 2015–2026
Activity record
173 sponsored measures adopted; present or late in 243 of 259 Full Council attendance records.
Outcome, voting, and attendance describe the record; they do not add to or subtract from the LegisRate score.
3 opposed · 0 abstained
243 of 259 records
Sponsorship record128 prime · 38 co-sponsor · 7 unranked · 173 early-recorded
Record details Outcome, voting, attendance, and sponsorship context
Only the latest recorded legislative vote per matter is used; a missing structured tally is not counted as an absence.
Separate public records · non-scoring context
Financial information
Campaign contributions show money given to a campaign. Personal disclosure filings list reported income, investments and financial interests, often in broad ranges. These records do not estimate personal wealth or establish donor influence.
Campaign contributions
Reviewed2025 Mayor race
Selected campaign's reported and SEEC-coded contributions; amendments can change this snapshot.
Checked Oct 12, 2026
Donor list ranks reported donor names by direct private cash and in-kind contributions, net of audited corrections. Vouchers, candidate funding, loans and independent expenditures are separate.
Top 20 reported donor names · 402 names including ties
Equal amounts share a rank; names are alphabetical within a tie. The list includes ties at the cutoff.
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Aaron Loehr $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ada Healey $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Adrian Hanauer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Adriane Brown $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Alan Lee $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Alberto Deloucas $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Alex Mertens $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Alex Pace $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Alexander D Alben $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Alvin Smith $650.00 total Cash $900.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$250.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Amy Hoff $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Andrew Brand $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Andrew Lee $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Angela Dunleavy $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ann Stodola $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Anna Deliganis $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Anne Knight $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Anthony Metoyer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Assoc General Contractors of WA Build PAC $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · ATU COPE $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
Show 382 more names, including every tie at the cutoff
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Audrey Covner $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Barbara C Koh $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Barton Evans $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ben Hoefer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Benjamin Margoles $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Beth Galetti $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Bill Clarke $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Blaine Tamaki $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Blair Payson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Bobby Holt $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Bonnie Glenn $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Bonnie Kellogg $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Brad Goldberg $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Brad Reisinger $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Brian Lonergan $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Brian McManus $650.00 total Cash $660.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$10.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Brian Regan $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Brian Sims $650.00 total Cash $1,150.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$500.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Bruce Blume $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Bryan Hale $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Bryan Kelly $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Burton Walls $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Carl Behnke $650.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Carl Haglund $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Carolyn Grinstein $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Catherine V Malshuk $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Cathy Rodden $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Cem Sibay $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Chaitra Vedullapalli $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Charles Gust $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Christine Yorozu $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Cindy Minor $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Claudia Link $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Cliff Avril $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Collin R Hathaway $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Connie Kanter $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Cornelius A Nicholson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Courtney Keller $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Craig Kairis $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Craig S Schafer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Craig Sims $650.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$50.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Culture PAC $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Dale P Chihuly $650.00 total Cash $1,300.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$650.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Damian Hunt $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Damon Fletcher $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Dan Eder $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Danae Howe $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Daniel Bridge $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Daniel S Fulton $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Darnell Cola $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Daryl Connell $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Dave D. Miller $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · David A Sabey $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · David Enslow $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · David G Thyer $650.00 total Cash $775.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$125.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · David Mandley $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Dawn Mason $650.00 total Cash $850.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$200.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Deborah Killinger $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Denise Moriguchi $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Derek C Straight $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Derek L Chinn $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Derrick Wheeler-Smith $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Dina Alhadeff $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Donald Burton $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Donald E. Marcy Also reported as: Donald Marcy $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Donald Loeb $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Dorothy Bullitt $650.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Doug Smith $650.00 total Cash $1,150.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$500.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Douglas O. Howe $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Duc Tran $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Eddie Lincoln $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Edward Bridge $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Elizabeth Dunn $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Elizabeth Hilton $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Elizabeth Malshuk $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Elizabeth Roberts $650.00 total Cash $900.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$250.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Emelie East $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Emily White $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Eric C Evans $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Eric Muller $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Eric Pettigrew $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Eric Smith $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Erica Buckley $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Erin Hathaway $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ernest Gonzalez Also reported as: Ernie Gonzalez $650.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Eugene Kettler $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Eulalie Scandiuzzi $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Everett Billingslea $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Frank Podany $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ga Eun Sung $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Gabe Rosenshine $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Gary A. Young $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Gary Duvall $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Gary Locke $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · George Griffin $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · George Laramore $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Gerald Grinstein $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Gerry Johnson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Gordon Gardiner $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Gordon Lyon $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Greg B. Smith $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Greg Brown $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Greg Goodwin $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Gregory Dunfield $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Guy Palumbo $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · H.S. Wright, III $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Hal Strong $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Han Kim $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Hardy Li $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Helen K Curtis $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Henry G Liebman $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Howard Behar $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Hung Szeto $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Hyeok Kim $650.00 total Cash $1,200.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$550.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Intl Union of Operating Engineers Local 302 Political Fund $650.00 total Cash $1,200.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$550.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ivone Etzioni $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · J. Stephan Banchero, III $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jaci S McCormack $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jack Timmons $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · James Andrus $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · James Brown $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · James Kinsella $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jamie Strayer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jane Noland $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jared E Axelrod $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jason Davies $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jason Flynn $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jay Fredericksen $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jean Thompson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jeanne Marie Coronado $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jeannie Nordstrom $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jeff Cleator $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jeffery D. Gow $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jeffrey J. Wright $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jeffrey Seely $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jennifer L Lekisch $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jennifer Siegel $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jim Buchanan $650.00 total Cash $660.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$10.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jim Mallahan $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jim Sinegal $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Joan L Enticknap $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Joan Yoshitomi $650.00 total Cash $800.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$150.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jodi Green $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Joel Aslanian $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · John Brigham $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · John Mertens $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · John Stanton $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · John Stephan Banchero, Jr $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jon A Shirley $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jonahan Nash $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jonathan J Bridge $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Joseph Agboka $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Joseph E Kenny $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Joseph L Schocken $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Joseph Whittinghill $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Josh Nordtvedt $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Joshua D Ayala $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Joshua Green, III $650.00 total Cash $1,150.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$500.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Judy T Foss $650.00 total Cash $660.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$10.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Juli Farris $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Julie Larsen $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Jurian Vreeburg $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kara Sims $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Karen Gamoran Liebman $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Katherine Janeway $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kathi Lentzsch $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kathleen Stack $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kathryn K Strong $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kathryn Surace-Smith $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Keelan F Lehmann $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Keith Matthews $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Keith Miller $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kevin Acebo $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kevin Daniels $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kevin Wallace $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kim Clauson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kim Shirley $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kris Smith $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kristin Ferguson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kurt Lamp $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kyle Hepper $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kyle Rolfe $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Kyung Lee $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Laborers Local Union #242 SSF $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Landon Taylor $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Larry Rodden $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Laurel Nesholm $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Laurie Padden $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Lawrence Engel $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Lawrence Y Lui $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Lawson Wong $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Legeset Woldu $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Leidy McIntosh $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Lema Woldegiorgis $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Leslie J Chihuly $650.00 total Cash $1,300.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$650.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Linda Robin Du Brin $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Lisa J Dowdle $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Lisa Schafer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Lori Matsukawa $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Louis Hunter $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Lynn Behar $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Lynn Mowe $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Marc Rousso $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Margaret A Allison $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Margaret Walker $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Maria Cristina Lemos $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Marjorie Mar $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mark Cairns $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mark Dowdle $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mark Houtchens $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mark Mullet $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mark Parris $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mark Sims $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Marques Warren $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Marta Lema $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Martha Kongsgaard $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Martin Smith $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mary Dunnam $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mary Herche $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mary Kerr $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mary O'Brien $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mary Snapp $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mary Watts $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Maryanne Tagney $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Matt Ehrlichman $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Matt Griffin Also reported as: Matt J Griffin $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Matthew Kellogg $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Megan C Nordtvedt $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Melinda Herrin $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Melissa J Nielsen $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Melvin Flowers $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mian Rice $650.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michael A Nelson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michael B Adler $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michael Deal $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michael Dryja $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michael Fox $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michael Goldfarb $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michael Humphries $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michael Mathieu $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michael Parham $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michael Powers $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michele Sevart $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michelle Heesun Kim $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Michelle Ventoza $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mikal Thomsen $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mike Hughes $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ming Xiao $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Minou Reisinger $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Mitchell Gold $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Monica Smith $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Muckleshoot Indian Tribe $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Murray Mar $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Nancy Mack $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Nathan Every $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Nicholas Ramirez $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Nicholas S Malshuk $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Nick Keller $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Nicoline Nelson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · O'Brien Investment Company $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ollie Garrett $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Pamela Gow $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Pamela K Green $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Pamela S Bridge $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Patricia Fearey $650.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Patricia Handjaja $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Patrick J Foley $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Paul Jackson $650.00 total Cash $750.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$100.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Paul Sandhu $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Paula Sardinas $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Pavel J Mazac $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Pearl H Leung $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Peter Larsen $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Peter Vial $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Randall Rubenstein $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Raymond Connell $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rebecca L Ebsworth $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rebecca Russo $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rebecca S Norton $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Reggie Brown $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Renee J Behnke $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rental Housing Assoc of WA $650.00 total Cash $1,200.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$550.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rex Bates $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Richard de Sam Lazaro $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Richard J Lehmann $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Richard Mack $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Richard Min $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Richard Padden $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rick Barlow $650.00 total Cash $660.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$10.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rick Cantu $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rick Koch $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rob Makin $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Robert B Strong $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Robert Braun $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Robert C Wallace $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Robert McCullough $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Robert McNeal $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Robert O'Rear $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Robert Ratliffe $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Robert Spitzer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rod Brandon $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rogelio Riojas $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rogelio Riojas $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ron Sevart $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Rose Roberts $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Russell Normann $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ruth Warren $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ryan Ames $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ryan Bayne $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Ryan Wilson $650.00 total Cash $800.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$150.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Sal Cohen $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Sally Stack Lehmann $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Sally Wolf $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Sam E Baker $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Sam Ketcham $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Samatar Guled $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Sandra L Sabey $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Sandy Aslanian $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Sarah Mayes $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Scott E Shapiro $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Scott Smith $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Seattle Hospitality for Progress $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · SEIU 775 Quality Care Committee $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Sherry D Harris $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Simcha Shtull $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Sirelle Wilkerson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Solynn McCurdy $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Spencer Frazer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Spencer Hurst $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Stacey Levitan $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Stan McCammon $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Stephen Graham $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Stephen K Malshuk $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Stephen Loeb $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Stephen Romein $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Stephen Sundquist $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Stephen Whyte $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Steve Berman $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Steve Koh $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Steven Fetter $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Steven Pumphrey $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Susan Brotman $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Susan Brown $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Susan W Potts $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Suzanne Kalish $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tai-Ling Hsieh $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Takayo Ederer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tanya Kim $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tanya R Jimale $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Taylor Hoang $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Teamsters Local 117 $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Teamsters Local 174 Separate Segregated Fund $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Teamsters Local Union No 763 Separate Segregated Fund $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Terry Zerngast $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Thomas F Bangasser $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Thomas F. Herche $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Thomas Lynch $650.00 total Cash $660.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections −$10.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Thomas Markl $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tim Minor $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tina Albro $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tod Leiweke $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tom Albro $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tom Neubauer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tom O. Graff $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tomio Moriguchi $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Tylie Cramer $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · W.J. Tom Ferguson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Walt Townes $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Walter Weber $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Washington Bikes $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Washington Education Association PAC $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Washington Machinists Council $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Washington State Democrats $650.00 total Cash $0.00 · in-kind $650.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Wellesley Parker $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Wendy E Norman $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Wesley Burns $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Will Daugherty $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · William H Pittman $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · William W Potts $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Yan Qing Tan $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Yemi Jackson $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (402 names) · Zachary Smith $650.00 total Cash $650.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
Names are grouped only by official contributor ID. Similar names, households and employers are not combined based on assumptions.
Campaign funding breakdown
- Anonymous contributions$70.00
- Candidate self-financing$43,743.13
- Ordinary Democracy Vouchers$486,975.00
- Miscellaneous receipts$250.00
- Direct private cash and in-kind, net of audited corrections$623,379.06
- Unitemized contributions$35,245.02
Sources and coverage
Selected campaign's reported and SEEC-coded contributions; amendments can change this snapshot.
One election cycle; primary and general are combined. This is not a lifetime total.
Contributor names follow public campaign filing IDs; reported names are not inferred identities.
Vouchers, candidate funding, loans and other receipts are separate from the donor ranking.
Independent expenditures are outside the candidate donor list.
This is a dated snapshot; later filings or amendments can change amounts.
Independent expenditures are not included in this donor list; this does not mean none were reported. Separate from direct candidate donors; deferred in this pilot. Check the separate SEEC record
Personal financial disclosure
ReviewedLatest available publicly indexed PDC personal filing as of 2026-10-12; actual filing office: MAYOR — CITY OF SEATTLE. Covers 2025-01-01 through 2025-12-31. Historical personal disclosure, not present wealth or necessarily income/assets during Seattle Council service.
Checked Oct 12, 2026
Washington PDC Personal Financial Affairs (F-1) · official statement viewer
Coverage year 2025 · Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 · received Mar 13, 2026
View 12 disclosed entries
Disclosed income · 1
-
City of Seattle
MAYOR Filer
- Reported income range$200,000.00 - $499,999.99
Financial assets and investment income · 10
-
Wells Fargo
Checking and Savings Account Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
-
Bank of America
Checking and Savings Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
-
Fidelity Investments
Retirement and Investment Account Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$1,000,000.00 or more
- Reported income range$500,000.00 - $749,999.99
-
Prudential Investment Management Services LLC
Retirement and Investment Account Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
-
personal
Microsoft Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$1,000,000.00 or more
- Reported income range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
Reported ticker: MSFT
-
personal
Google Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
Reported ticker: GOOGL
-
personal
Boeing Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
Reported ticker: BA
-
personal
Costco Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
Reported ticker: COSTC
-
personal
Bank of America Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
Reported ticker: BAC
-
personal
Amazon Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$100,000.00 - $199,999.99
- Reported income rangeLess than $30,000.00
Reported ticker: AMZN
Washington real estate · 1
-
Washington real estate
Reported property; location omitted Joint disclosure (whole source band; no inferred share)
- Reported value range$1,000,000.00 or more
Sources and coverage
Latest available publicly indexed PDC personal filing as of 2026-10-12; actual filing office: MAYOR — CITY OF SEATTLE. Covers 2025-01-01 through 2025-12-31. Historical personal disclosure, not present wealth or necessarily income/assets during Seattle Council service.
Self-reported personal disclosure, separate from campaign contributions, government finance and LegisRate scores. Bands are not exact income or net worth. Asset values describe the reporting period, not present holdings. An entry does not establish a conflict, misconduct or donor influence. Blank amount fields remain unspecified.
Includes filer and explicitly joint entries only. Family-only entries, all addresses, parcel identifiers, contacts, signatures, account identifiers, loan terms/security and unnecessary personal descriptions are omitted. Joint bands are not divided into a personal share.
Manual category/identity review of actual official source JSON; no net-worth calculation.
No included row is not evidence of no income, no assets, no liabilities or no business role.
Mortgages are drawn from the real-estate section as well as the separate debt section.
Repeated source rows are preserved; account labels or repeated bands are not deduplicated.
The same latest personal mayoral filing appears on both of this person's Council and mayor profiles; it is one statement, not two financial totals.
SEEC separate local F-1 statements · checked Oct 12, 2026: SEEC directs readers to contact its office for statement copies. No request made. Source
What the work concerns
Policy-area mix
Government Operations & Finance accounts for the largest share of points in the full 2015–2026 record: 122.1 points (26.9%).
Hover or focus a slice for detail.
Government Operations & Finance
122.1 points · 26.9%Utilities & Technology
81.3 points · 17.9%Labor & City Workforce
47.9 points · 10.6%Public Safety & Justice
42.7 points · 9.4%Civil Rights & Democracy
42.3 points · 9.3%Transportation & Infrastructure
26.7 points · 5.9%Arts, Culture & Community
20.8 points · 4.6%Budget & Appropriations
19.3 points · 4.2%Land Use & Development
17.6 points · 3.9%Health & Human Services
14.7 points · 3.2%Economy & Small Business
8.6 points · 1.9%Housing & Homelessness
6.0 points · 1.3%Other smaller areas
4.0 points · 0.9%Individual areas below 1% are grouped here only so the chart stays readable.
- Environment, Climate & Parks4.0 points · 0.9%
By year
Annual work
In 2019, 42 sponsored measures were adopted, contributing 95.2 points.
Full annual history · 2015–2026. Points use the measure’s introduction year.
| Year | Points | Sponsored measures adopted |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 95.2 | 42 |
| 2018 | 58.6 | 17 |
| 2017 | 133.4 | 52 |
| 2016 | 86.7 | 31 |
| 2015 | 80.1 | 31 |
| Total in available record | 453.9 | 173 |
Year-by-year participation and sponsorship details
| Year | Points | Passed | Pass rate | Original | Co-sponsored | Opposed | Abstained | Attendance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 95.2 | 42 | 100.0 | 42 | 15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 93.9 |
| 2018 | 58.6 | 17 | 100.0 | 17 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
| 2017 | 133.4 | 52 | 100.0 | 52 | 13 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 83.6 |
| 2016 | 86.7 | 31 | 100.0 | 31 | 5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 94.5 |
| 2015 | 80.1 | 31 | 100.0 | 31 | 11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 98.0 |
| Total in available record | 453.9 | 173 | 100.0 | 173 | 45 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 93.8 |
Rates are shown only when the relevant official record exists. Vote and attendance measures describe participation; they do not affect points.
Council roles
Committees & positions
12 committee assignments available for recorded service.
- ChairEducation, Equity, and Governance Committee
- ChairGovernance, Equity, and Technology Committee
- Vice ChairHuman Services and Public Health Committee
- Vice ChairHuman Services, Equitable Development, and Renter Rights Committee
- Vice ChairParks, Seattle Center, Libraries, and Gender Pay Equity Committee
- ChairPublic Safety, Civil Rights, and Technology Committee
- AlternateCivil Rights, Utilities, Economic Development, and Arts Committee
- MemberCommittee on Central Waterfront, Seawall, and Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Program
- MemberCommittee on Taxi, For-Hire, and Limousine Regulations
- AlternateEnergy Committee
- MemberFinance and Neighborhoods Committee
- MemberParks, Seattle Center, Libraries, and Waterfront Committee
Point-by-point audit
Contributing bills
173 adopted measures contribute to the full 2015–2026 total. Bills are listed by credited points.
Open filtered explorerRepealing Ordinance 125578 relating to adding a new Chapter 5.37 (Employee Hours Tax) and a new Chapter 5.38 to Title 5 of….CB 119280 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City Workforce +7.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; repealing Ordinance 125578 relating to adding a new Chapter 5.37 (Employee Hours Tax) and a new Chapter 5.38 to Title 5 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $47,400,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild to be effective….CB 119368 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City Workforce +6.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild to be effective January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020; amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), by increasing appropriations to the Seattle Police Department and the Police Relief and Pension Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $65,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget.CB 119046 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & Appropriations +6.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to automated fixed camera revenue; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the 2017 Budget; and amending Sections 5.81.010 and 5.82.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.
Factors [1, 1, 1, 2]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to cable television.CB 118549 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +6.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to cable television; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to enter into a renewed Cable Television Franchise Agreement with Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC; and authorizing the Chief Technology Officer to enter into other agreements for the purpose of implementing or administering the renewed franchise.
Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $87,518,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [2, 2, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Chapters 14.16, 14.17, 14.19, and 14.20 of the Seattle Municipal Code to prescribe additional remedies and enforcement procedures, harmonize ordinance language….CB 118585 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Labor & City Workforce +6.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; amending Chapters 14.16, 14.17, 14.19, and 14.20 of the Seattle Municipal Code to prescribe additional remedies and enforcement procedures, harmonize ordinance language, and add provisions to facilitate compliance; amending Section 3.14.931 of the Seattle Municipal Code to update duties of the Seattle Human Rights Commission; and amending Section 5.55.230 of the Seattle Municipal Code to require labor standards compliance for business license tax certificates.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $46,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union….CB 119553 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City Workforce +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 77 Power Marketers Unit to be effective January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute an amendment to the facility use agreement with Force 10 Hoops, LLC, authorized by Ordinance….CB 119549 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Arts, Culture & Community +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute an amendment to the facility use agreement with Force 10 Hoops, LLC, authorized by Ordinance 125323 for use and occupancy of KeyArena for playing of professional women’s basketball games; making findings of fact about the value provided by professional women’s basketball in Seattle; amending the relocation payment structure in the agreement; and exempting the amendment from the requirements of Chapter 20.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,600,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Creates the position of code reviser.CB 119594 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & Finance +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to interpretations, corrections, and revisions of the Seattle Municipal Code; creating the position of code reviser; authorizing the code reviser to correct and revise nonsubstantive errors in the Seattle Municipal Code; adding rules of construction for the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Section 1.01.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 1.03 and Sections 1.04.030, 1.04.040, 1.04.050, 1.04.060, 1.04.070, and 1.04.080 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requests the Chief Technology Officer to set the program’s guidelines, goals, project eligibility and selection criteria, and maximum grant awards, and to….Res 31919 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Utilities & Technology +5.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Technology Matching Fund program; requesting the Chief Technology Officer to set the program’s guidelines, goals, project eligibility and selection criteria, and maximum grant awards, and to execute contracts and encumber funds in support of the program; approving the membership requirements of a review committee to recommend project selection under the program; and requesting the Chief Technology Officer to approve projects under the program after receiving recommendations from the review committee.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2017.CB 119029 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Technology Matching Fund Program; making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2017; providing that 2017 appropriations for the Technology Matching Fund from the Cable Television Franchise Subfund and from the Information Technology Fund shall automatically carry forward into the 2018 fiscal year; allowing that any unspent funds from an individual project may be applied to another project that meets the goals of the Digital Equity Initiative; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,220,832. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [2, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to enter into a renewed Cable Television Franchise Agreement and an agreement regarding additional public….CB 119030 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to cable television; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to enter into a renewed Cable Television Franchise Agreement and an agreement regarding additional public benefits with WaveDivision I, LLC; and authorizing the Chief Technology Officer to enter into other agreements for the purpose of implementing or administering the renewed franchise.
Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,960,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [2, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Solid Waste System Improvement and….Res 31677 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +5.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Solid Waste System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2016, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124913 and in Ordinance 124915; confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Solid Waste System of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken and to be taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $82,175,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2016.CB 118764 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Technology Matching Fund Program; making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2016; providing that 2016 appropriations for the Technology Matching Fund from the Cable Television Franchise Subfund and from the Information Technology Fund shall automatically carry forward into the 2017 fiscal year; allowing that any unspent funds from an individual project may be applied to another project that meets the goals of the Digital Equity Initiative; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,900,832. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [2, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2015.CB 118439 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Technology Matching Fund Program; making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2015; providing that 2015 appropriations for the Technology Matching Fund from the Cable Television Franchise Subfund and from the Information Technology Fund shall automatically carry forward into the 2016 fiscal year; allowing that any unspent funds from an individual project may be applied to another Technology Matching Fund project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,430,832. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [2, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending the definition of “gender identity” in Sections 14.04.030, 14.06.020, 14.08.020, and 14.10.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118455 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Civil Rights & Democracy +5.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to gender identity and all-gender single-occupant restrooms in Seattle; amending the definition of “gender identity” in Sections 14.04.030, 14.06.020, 14.08.020, and 14.10.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending the definition of “place of public accommodation” in Section 14.06.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Section 14.06.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify the right of individuals to use gender-specific facilities consistent with their gender identity; and adding a new Chapter 14.07 to the Seattle Municipal Code providing for all-gender restrooms in City-controlled buildings and places of public accommodation and prescribing enforcement procedures.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $21,230. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 23.55.002, 23.55.003, 23.55.005, and 23.84A.036.CB 119543 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 23.55.002, 23.55.003, 23.55.005, and 23.84A.036; and adding new SMC Sections 23.55.052, 23.55.054, 23.55.056, 23.55.057, 23.55.058, and 23.55.060; to establish a sign overlay district and sign regulations for the Seattle Center, including regulations for subareas containing the Seattle Center Arena and the Bressi Garage block.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a 15-year lease with Cascade Public Media governing the City’s continued use….CB 119599 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & Appropriations +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s continued use of Cascade Public Media’s Capitol Hill transmission site and tower; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a 15-year lease with Cascade Public Media governing the City’s continued use of the transmission site and tower for radio equipment and associated antennae; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $290,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 2]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2019.CB 119595 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Technology Matching Fund; making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2019; and allowing that any unspent funds from an individual project may be applied to another project that meets the goals of the Digital Equity Initiative.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the sale and use of tobacco and marijuana products to and by minors.CB 119636 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the sale and use of tobacco and marijuana products to and by minors; amending Sections 6.240.010 and 6.240.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 12A.20.110 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates crimes and offenses concerning animals.CB 119637 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to crimes and offenses concerning animals; amending Section 9.25.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates public works and improvements.CB 119697 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & Finance +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to public works and improvements; amending Sections 20.04.090 and 20.04.270 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Raising limits of certain items on the statement of financial affairs in conformity with state law.CB 119279 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & Justice +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to elections; raising limits of certain items on the statement of financial affairs in conformity with state law; changing deadlines and definitions related to the democracy voucher program to align better with other state and City practices; creating a crime of falsifying democracy voucher program qualification information; making technical corrections to and reorganizing and clarifying the content of the democracy voucher program; and amending Sections 2.04.165 and 2.04.370 and Chapter 2.04, Subchapter VIII of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $34,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
To initiate a SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area.RES 31823 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Economy & Small Business +4.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION to initiate a SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $987,462. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2018.CB 119328 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Technology Matching Fund Program; making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2018; providing that 2018 appropriations for the Technology Matching Fund from the Cable TV Franchise Fund and from the Information Technology Fund shall automatically carry forward into the 2019 fiscal year; allowing that any unspent funds from an individual project may be applied to another project that meets the goals of the Digital Equity Initiative; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Ordinance 125376 and Chapter 14.18 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119218 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & Justice +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; amending Ordinance 125376 and Chapter 14.18 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Establishes a new SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area (BIA).CB 119297 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Economy & Small Business +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing a new SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area (BIA); levying special assessments upon owners of business, multi-family residential, and mixed-use properties within the area; providing for the deposit of revenues in a special account and expenditures therefrom; providing for collection of and penalties for delinquencies; providing for the establishment of a Ratepayers Advisory Board; providing for an implementation agreement with a program manager; providing for the continuity of services and the distribution of remaining funds from the current SoDo BIA account that was established in 2013 by Ordinance 124306; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $987,462. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Recognizing the legacy of The City of Seattle’s relationship with the City of Mazatlán, Mexico, and declaring the designation of emeritus status….Res 31744 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & Community +4.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Sister Cities Program; recognizing the legacy of The City of Seattle’s relationship with the City of Mazatlán, Mexico, and declaring the designation of emeritus status to the sister city affiliation between The City of Seattle and the City of Mazatlán, Mexico; recognizing the importance to The City of Seattle of maintaining a sister city relationship with a city in Mexico; and lifting the moratorium on accepting applications for establishing new sister city affiliations for the limited purpose of accepting an application for the establishment of a new sister city affiliation with a city in Mexico.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a license agreement with King County for its use of the radio-transmitter….CB 119079 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City of Seattle’s Maple Leaf radio-transmitter facility; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a license agreement with King County for its use of the radio-transmitter site at Maple Leaf reservoir for the new regional Puget Sound emergency radio network; and declaring a portion of property licensed for King County’s use in the same location to be surplus to the City’s utility needs.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,910,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to approve the transfer of control, subject to conditions, of WaveDivision I, LLC.CB 119090 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to cable television; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to approve the transfer of control, subject to conditions, of WaveDivision I, LLC; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to execute a Cable Franchise Transfer of Controlling Interest Consent Agreement for the purpose of implementing and administering the transfer; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [2, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates Hearing Examiner filing fees.CB 118694 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City Workforce +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Hearing Examiner filing fees; amending Section 3.02.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code to add exceptions for cases brought to enforce Chapter 14.07 (All Gender Single Occupant Restroom Requirements), Chapter 6.500 (Marijuana Business Regulations), Chapter 14.19 (Minimum Wage Ordinance), and Chapter 14.20 (Wage Theft Ordinance).
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $85. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the for-hire industry, including wheelchair accessible taxis and for-hire industry insurance.CB 118712 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & Infrastructure +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the for-hire industry, including wheelchair accessible taxis and for-hire industry insurance; amending Sections 6.310.260, 6.310.300, and 6.310.500 and repealing Section 6.310.335 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates international affairs and the Seattle Sister Cities program, amending Sections 3.14.440, 3.14.450, 3.14.460, and 3.14.470 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118754 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Arts, Culture & Community +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to international affairs and the Seattle Sister Cities program, amending Sections 3.14.440, 3.14.450, 3.14.460, and 3.14.470 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the regulation of the for-hire industry, amending Sections 6.310.110 and 6.310.735 of the Seattle Municipal Code to add clarity to the….CB 118793 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & Infrastructure +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the regulation of the for-hire industry, amending Sections 6.310.110 and 6.310.735 of the Seattle Municipal Code to add clarity to the qualifying driver description and extend the commencement date, and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Revising the designated member representation of the Seattle Fire Code Advisory Board to include representatives of the services industry, major institutions, and….CB 118309 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & Justice +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Fire Code Advisory Board; revising the designated member representation of the Seattle Fire Code Advisory Board to include representatives of the services industry, major institutions, and the Fire Fighters and Fire Chiefs labor unions; creating a new Subchapter V in Chapter 3.16 of the Seattle Municipal Code consisting of new Sections 3.16.300, 3.16.310, 3.16.320, 3.16.330, 3.16.340, 3.16.350 and 3.16.360; all by amending Ordinance 119799.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adding a new Section 3.22.050 to the Seattle Municipal Code to authorize the Chief Technology Officer to enter into agreements with public….CB 118341 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to colocation of the City’s data centers; adding a new Section 3.22.050 to the Seattle Municipal Code to authorize the Chief Technology Officer to enter into agreements with public and private entities for data center colocation space and services; including lease agreements for the City’s use and occupancy of data center colocation facilities, and agreements for related colocation services; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Chapter 21.60 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect advances in technology and changes in federal law, to create a logical….CB 118347 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s Cable Communications Ordinance; amending Chapter 21.60 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect advances in technology and changes in federal law, to create a logical organization of the Chapter for ease of reference, to promote competition in cable services, to enhance consumer protection, and to reserve the City’s authority in a fluid regulatory environment; updating the membership requirements and duties of the Citizens’ Telecommunications and Technology Advisory Board, renaming it the Community Technology Advisory Board, and moving the requirements and duties of the Board from Chapter 21.60 to Chapter 3.22; renaming Subtitle V of Title 21 and Chapter 21.60; amending Sections 3.02.125, 21.60.010, 21.60.020, 21.60.030, 21.60.040, 21.60.050, 21.60.060, 21.60.080, 21.60.090, 21.60.100, 21.60.110, 21.60.120, 21.60.130, 21.60.140, 21.60.150, 21.60.160, 21.60.170, 21.60.180, 21.60.190, 21.60.200, 21.60.210, 21.60.220, 21.60.240, 21.60.250, 21.60.260, 21.60.270, 21.60.280, 21.60.800, 21.60.820, and 21.60.830; repealing Sections 21.60.230, 21.60.290, 21.60.295, 21.60.300, 21.60.310, 21.60.320, 21.60.330, 21.60.340, 21.60.350, 21.60.360, 21.60.370, 21.60.380, 21.60.390, 21.60.400, 21.60.440, 21.60.450, 21.60.460, 21.60.470, 21.60.480, 21.60.490, 21.60.500, 21.60.510, 21.60.520, 21.60.530, 21.60.540, 21.60.550, 21.60.560, 21.60.570, 21.60.580, 21.60.590, 21.60.600, 21.60.620, 21.60.630, 21.60.640, 21.60.650, 21.60.660, 21.60.670, 21.60.680, 21.60.690, 21.60.700, 21.60.710, and 21.60.810; and adding Sections 3.22.050, 21.60.070, 21.60.125, 21.60.825, 21.60.840, and 21.60.850 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Ordinance 123461.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to cable television.CB 118411 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to cable television; authorizing the Mayor or his designee to enter into a new Cable Television Franchise Agreement and an agreement regarding additional public benefits with Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink; authorizing the Chief Technology Officer to enter into other agreements for the purpose of implementing or administering the new franchise; increasing appropriations in the 2015 budget of the Department of Information Technology for costs incurred in processing the franchise application; and transferring cash received for processing the franchise application; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $40,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [2, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Chief of Police to issue Special Police Officer Commissions to qualified government employees to conduct limited law enforcement duties or….CB 118476 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & Justice +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; authorizing the Chief of Police to issue Special Police Officer Commissions to qualified government employees to conduct limited law enforcement duties or to former police officers or parking enforcement officers to conduct traffic control; eliminating the authority to authorize Retired Police Officer Commissions; amending Section 3.28.150, and repealing Sections 3.28.450, 3.28.460, 3.28.470, and 3.28.480 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to the City’s Emergency Management Program.CB 118483 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & Justice +4.0 pts
Official titleAn ORDINANCE related to the City’s Emergency Management Program; adding Sections 10.02.045 and 10.02.047 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to refine the roles and responsibilities of the Office of Emergency Management; and amending Sections 10.02.050, 10.02.060, 10.02.070, 10.02.080, 10.02.090, 10.02.100, and 10.02.110 of the SMC to accommodate these refinements.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to the City’s Emergency Management Program.Res 31632 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Public Safety & Justice +4.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the City’s Emergency Management Program; amending the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Base Plan, Emergency Operations Plan, and All-Hazards Mitigation Plan as required by Seattle Municipal Code Section 10.02.050, RCW 38.52.077, and WAC 118-30-060.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the City’s criminal code.CB 118576 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & Justice +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; amending Sections 6.36.020, 12A.06.120, 12A.06.180, 12A.06.195, 12A.14.080, 12A.16.030, 12A.20.100, 12A.24.010, 12A.24.150, 18.12.255, and 18.12.257 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adding Sections 12A.10.150, 12A.10.220, and 12A.24.105 to the Seattle Municipal Code to conform the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and make technical corrections.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the City’s traffic code.CB 118577 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & Infrastructure +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s traffic code; amending Sections 11.14.055, 11.14.184, 11.23.380, 11.23.400, 11.31.020, 11.34.020, 11.56.020, 11.56.025, 11.56.320, 11.56.350, 11.56.355, 11.57.310, 11.72.065, and 11.84.380 of the Seattle Municipal Code, adding Section 11.58.435 to the Seattle Municipal Code, and repealing Section 11.14.185 of the Seattle Municipal Code to conform the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and make technical corrections.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77….CB 119623 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City Workforce +3.6 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77 Information Technology Professionals Unit; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $74,700,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a lease with King County for its use of part of the….CB 119454 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s Myrtle reservoir radio-transmitter facility; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a lease with King County for its use of part of the radio-transmitter facility for the new, regional Puget Sound Emergency Radio Network; declaring the part of the facility leased for King County’s use to be surplus to the City’s utility needs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $580,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2019 Work Program.Res 31864 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2019 Work Program.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2019 Adopted Budget, 2020 Endorsed Budget, and 2019-2024 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.Res 31865 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Budget & Appropriations +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2019 Adopted Budget, 2020 Endorsed Budget, and 2019-2024 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Superseding Resolution 31859.Res 31883 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2018 and 2019; and superseding Resolution 31859.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2018-2019 and superseding Resolution 31790.Res 31884 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2018-2019 and superseding Resolution 31790.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Superseding Resolution 31792.Res 31885 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2018 and 2019, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 31792.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 31886 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; amending Attachment 1 of Resolution 31806, Chapter XI.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2018 surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Department of Transportation’s use of closed-circuit television traffic….CB 119519 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2018 surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Department of Transportation’s use of closed-circuit television traffic cameras and license plate readers.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Concerning Washington Referendum Measure No. 88 (“Referendum 88”), proposing voter approval of Initiative Measure No. 1000, and urging Seattle voters to vote….Res 31913 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION concerning Washington Referendum Measure No. 88 (“Referendum 88”), proposing voter approval of Initiative Measure No. 1000, and urging Seattle voters to vote “Approved” on Referendum 88 on the November 5, 2019, general election ballot.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 31920 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; superseding Resolutions 31806 and 31886.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into an easement area amendment agreement with King County, to revise the….CB 119707 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into an easement area amendment agreement with King County, to revise the legal description of an existing easement for an electric transmission and distribution line through King County Airport property.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2020 State Legislative Agenda.Res 31918 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2020 State Legislative Agenda.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Superseding Resolution 31749.Res 31792 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2018 and 2019, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 31749.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2018 Work Program.Res 31796 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2018 Work Program.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2018 Adopted Budget and 2018-2023 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.Res 31795 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Budget & Appropriations +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2018 Adopted Budget and 2018-2023 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Establishes a work program for the City Council to review the administrative rules and regulations to improve customer service and lower costs….Res 31808 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & Infrastructure +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the for-hire transportation industry; establishing a work program for the City Council to review the administrative rules and regulations to improve customer service and lower costs to participants, and to explore ways to ensure equal market access to all participants.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 31806 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; superseding Resolutions 31639 and 31659.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2019 State Legislative Agenda.Res 31852 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2019 State Legislative Agenda.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Grants conceptual approval of a Significant Structure Term Permit to Seattle Arena Company, LLC to construct, maintain, and operate a tunnel under….Res 31857 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Land Use & Development +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval of a Significant Structure Term Permit to Seattle Arena Company, LLC to construct, maintain, and operate a tunnel under and across Thomas Street, east of 1st Avenue North and west of Warren Avenue North, to enable the renovation of KeyArena at the Seattle Center.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Water System Improvement and Refunding….Res 31726 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Water System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2017, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 125183 and in Ordinance 124339 (as amended by Ordinance 125183); confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Municipal Water System of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken and to be taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Repealing Resolution 31708 in its entirety.Res 31727 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; repealing Resolution 31708 in its entirety; and confirming, ratifying and approving action taken by the Director of Finance of the City of Seattle and other City officials relating to terminating negotiations pursuant to the repealed resolution.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….Res 31728 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A (Multi-Modal) and Series 2017B (Multi-Modal), for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124916; authorizing the Director of Finance to execute a Continuing Covenant Agreement with the initial purchaser of such Bonds to negotiate and execute related documents and agreements from time to time in connection with the election of variable interest rate modes; and confirming, ratifying and approving action taken and to be taken by the Director of Finance of the City of Seattle and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds to the initial purchaser thereof and in connection with the election of variable interest rate modes with respect thereto throughout the term of such bonds.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2017 Adopted Budget, 2018 Endorsed Budget, and 2017-2022 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).Res 31734 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Budget & Appropriations +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2017 Adopted Budget, 2018 Endorsed Budget, and 2017-2022 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2017 Work Program.Res 31735 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2017 Work Program.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Resolution 31655.Res 31749 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31655; updating Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2016 and 2017, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
ratifying and confirming an emergency order permitting temporary night shelter at 1117 Northeast Boat Street.Res 31750 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Land Use & Development +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION ratifying and confirming an emergency order permitting temporary night shelter at 1117 Northeast Boat Street.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement….Res 31751 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Land Use & Development +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2017A, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement and Refunding Bonds, 2017B (Taxable), and Unlimited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 2017 for the purposes set forth in Ordinances 125197 and 121651 (as amended by Ordinance 122286 and amended and restated by Ordinance 124343); confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken and agreements entered into and to be entered into with the Seattle-Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority to provide for the refunding (pursuant to a refunding trust agreement with a refunding trustee) of certain outstanding bonds guaranteed by the City, and with the Seattle Opera for the use of bond proceeds for the replacement of the Mercer Arena; and confirming ratifying and approving the official notice of bond sale and other actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the various series of bonds to their purchasers.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts the Seattle Education Action Plan.Res 31748 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Health & Human Services +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle Education Action Plan.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adding a new Chapter 14.11, consisting of Sections 14.11.010, 14.11.020, 14.11.030, 14.11.040, 14.11.050, and 14.11.060, to the Seattle Municipal Code to codify….CB 119018 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & Justice +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to bias-free policing; adding a new Chapter 14.11, consisting of Sections 14.11.010, 14.11.020, 14.11.030, 14.11.040, 14.11.050, and 14.11.060, to the Seattle Municipal Code to codify Seattle’s commitment to bias-free policing, require the Seattle Police Department to have bias-free policing policies and training, create an enforcement mechanism against biased policing, and collect data to help ensure that biased policing does not occur.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the selection of a Chair, Vice-Chairs, and membership for the Select Budget Committee in 2017.Res 31776 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the selection of a Chair, Vice-Chairs, and membership for the Select Budget Committee in 2017.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2016-2017 and superseding Resolution 31644.Res 31777 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2016-2017 and superseding Resolution 31644.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates the 20-day procedural process pursuant to City Charter Article XIX for filling the vacancy in Council Position 8 until certification of….Res 31778 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the 20-day procedural process pursuant to City Charter Article XIX for filling the vacancy in Council Position 8 until certification of the November 2017 election results for Position 8.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119089 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a license agreement with the Department of the….CB 119092 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & Homelessness +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a license agreement with the Department of the Army for the City’s continued use of an approximately 13,000 square-foot warehouse facility at 1555 Alaskan Way South for the operation of the St. Martin de Porres shelter for homeless men over the age of 50, and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119094 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119095 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119096 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119097 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119121 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119127 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119133 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119139 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119143 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2018 State Legislative Agenda.Res 31787 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2018 State Legislative Agenda.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119148 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2018-2019 and superseding Resolution 31777.Res 31790 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2018-2019 and superseding Resolution 31777.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Superseding Resolution 31643.Res 31789 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2018 and 2019; and superseding Resolution 31643.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the execution of two memoranda of understanding between The City of Seattle and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77….CB 119160 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City Workforce +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of two memoranda of understanding between The City of Seattle and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77 to be effective January 23, 2017, through January 22, 2021; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $44. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119164 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Modifies the Mayoral Civil Emergency Order Addressing Encampments and Vehicles Used As Residences of January 19, 2016.Res 31649 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Housing & Homelessness +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION modifying the Mayoral Civil Emergency Order Addressing Encampments and Vehicles Used As Residences of January 19, 2016.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Resolution 31645.Res 31655 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31645; updating Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2016 and 2017, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2016 Work Program.Res 31656 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2016 Work Program.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Retiring introduced and referred Council Bills, Resolutions, and Clerk Files which have received no further action.Res 31658 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION retiring introduced and referred Council Bills, Resolutions, and Clerk Files which have received no further action.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Increasing the number of Legislative Assistant positions.CB 118664 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City Workforce +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Legislative Department staff; increasing the number of Legislative Assistant positions; amending Ordinance 118851; and amending the Legislative Assistant Compensation Plan Administrative Guidelines.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 31659 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; amending Attachment 1 of Resolution 31639, Section XI.D.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Ordinances 124509 and 124749, by amending the action plan and the implementation plan.CB 118679 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Health & Human Services +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Preschool Program; amending Ordinances 124509 and 124749, by amending the action plan and the implementation plan; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Drainage and Wastewater System Improvement….Res 31674 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Drainage and Wastewater System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2016, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124914 and in Ordinance 124338, as amended by Ordinance 124914; confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Drainage and Wastewater System of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken and to be taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the City of Kirkland for renewing an independent ethics program for the City….CB 118702 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission; authorizing the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the City of Kirkland for renewing an independent ethics program for the City of Kirkland; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure concerning health, labor, and safety standards for Seattle hotel employees.Res 31683 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure concerning health, labor, and safety standards for Seattle hotel employees; authorizing the City Clerk and the Executive Director of the Ethics and Elections Commission to take those actions necessary to enable the proposed Initiative to appear on the November 8, 2016 ballot and the local voters' pamphlet; requesting the King County Elections' Director to place the proposed Initiative on the November 8, 2016 election ballot; and providing for the publication of such proposed amendment.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Supports City of Seattle Initiative Measure 124 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 124 on the November 8, 2016….Res 31695 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting City of Seattle Initiative Measure 124 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 124 on the November 8, 2016 general election ballot.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Calling for a special election to fill a vacancy in the City employee-elected position on the Civil Service Commission and directing the….Res 31701 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Labor & City Workforce +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for a special election to fill a vacancy in the City employee-elected position on the Civil Service Commission and directing the City Clerk to administer the election.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Supports Washington Initiative Measure 1491 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1491 on the November 8, 2016 general election….Res 31702 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Washington Initiative Measure 1491 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1491 on the November 8, 2016 general election ballot.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Supports Washington Initiative Measure 1433 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1433 on the November 8, 2016 general election….Res 31703 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Washington Initiative Measure 1433 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1433 on the November 8, 2016 general election ballot.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Supports Sound Transit (A Regional Transit Authority) Proposition 1 ballot measure and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Sound Transit Proposition….Res 31704 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & Infrastructure +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Sound Transit (A Regional Transit Authority) Proposition 1 ballot measure and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Sound Transit Proposition 1 on the November 8, 2016 general election ballot.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Improvement….Res 31707 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & Technology +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2016C, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124916 and in Ordinance 124335 (as amended by Ordinance 124916); confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Light System of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken and to be taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….Res 31708 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & Democracy +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue Bonds, Series 2016D (Multi-Modal) and Series 2016E (Multi-Modal), for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124916; authorizing the Director of Finance to execute a Continuing Covenant Agreement with the initial purchaser of such Bonds to negotiate and execute related documents and agreements from time to time in connection with the election of variable interest rate modes; and confirming, ratifying and approving action taken and to be taken by the Director of Finance of the City of Seattle and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds to the initial purchaser thereof and in connection with the election of variable interest rate modes with respect thereto throughout the term of such bonds.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2017 State Legislative Agenda.Res 31723 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & Finance +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2017 State Legislative Agenda.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Recognizing the Vietnamese Heritage and Freedom flag as the symbol for Seattle’s Vietnamese community.Res 31591 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & Community +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the Vietnamese Heritage and Freedom flag as the symbol for Seattle’s Vietnamese community.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Establishes AlertSeattle as the City’s emergency notification and alerting system.CB 118507 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & Justice +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s (City) emergency notification and alerting system; establishing AlertSeattle as the City’s emergency notification and alerting system; adopting policies governing the use thereof including administrative guidelines and a governance charter; and repealing Ordinance Number 122527.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Recognizing the obstacles faced by previously incarcerated individuals that often result in recidivism, and the potential to reduce recidivism rates, criminal justice….Res 31637 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Public Safety & Justice +3.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the obstacles faced by previously incarcerated individuals that often result in recidivism, and the potential to reduce recidivism rates, criminal justice costs, and incarceration’s negative impacts on individuals, the community, and the City of Seattle; requesting the Mayor to establish a Prisoner and Community Corrections Re-entry Work Group composed of residents, City departments, the Seattle Municipal Court, and the Legislative Department to coordinate and strengthen the City’s efforts to assist prisoner community re-entry.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Removing certain considerations between an exclusive driver representative and the Director of Finance and Administrative Services.CB 119427 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & Infrastructure +2.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the regulation of the for-hire industry; removing certain considerations between an exclusive driver representative and the Director of Finance and Administrative Services; amending Section 6.310.735 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing rules and regulations to the extent they are inconsistent with this ordinance.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Pertaining to Admission Tax revenue.CB 119399 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & Finance +2.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE pertaining to Admission Tax revenue; amending Section 5.40.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code; making technical corrections to Ordinance 125672.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to KeyArena.CB 119088 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City Workforce +2.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to KeyArena; authorizing the Mayor to execute a memorandum of understanding with Oak View Group, LLC, regarding the redevelopment of KeyArena into a world-class, multi-purpose sports and entertainment arena at Seattle Center, including its design, construction, lease, financing and future operation; exempting the redevelopment and future operation of the Arena from the requirements of Chapter 20.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $150,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Fixing the date for hearing the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751 (“Waterfront LID”) to design and construct the….Res 31915 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Transportation & Infrastructure +2.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION fixing the date for hearing the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751 (“Waterfront LID”) to design and construct the Central Waterfront Improvement Program and directing that notice of the hearing be given in the manner required by law.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adding a new Chapter 14.09 (Fair Chance Housing) to the Seattle Municipal Code to regulate the use of criminal history in rental….CB 119015 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Civil Rights & Democracy +2.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to housing regulations; adding a new Chapter 14.09 (Fair Chance Housing) to the Seattle Municipal Code to regulate the use of criminal history in rental housing; authorizing the Seattle Office for Civil Rights to enforce the regulations set out in this new chapter; and amending Section 3.14.931 of the Seattle Municipal Code to expand the Seattle Human Rights Commission’s duties.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Reaffirming the City of Seattle’s support of Somali communities to continue remittances to Somalia and the Horn of Africa.Res 31578 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & Democracy +2.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming the City of Seattle’s support of Somali communities to continue remittances to Somalia and the Horn of Africa.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Resolution 31857 providing conceptual approval of a Significant Structure Term Permit to Seattle Arena Company, LLC to include the construction of….Res 31888 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +1.8 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31857 providing conceptual approval of a Significant Structure Term Permit to Seattle Arena Company, LLC to include the construction of permanent tensioned tie-backs in portions of Thomas Street, east of 1st Avenue North and west of 2nd Avenue North, and the long-term occupation of these permanent tensioned tie-backs in the right-of-way to enable the renovation of KeyArena at the Seattle Center.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adjusts the pay zone structures for the City’s Information Technology Professional discretionary pay program.CB 119624 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City Workforce +1.8 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adjusting the pay zone structures for the City’s Information Technology Professional discretionary pay program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Supports Washington Initiative Measure 940 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 940 on the November 6, 2018, general election….Res 31850 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & Democracy +1.8 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Washington Initiative Measure 940 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 940 on the November 6, 2018, general election ballot.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Resolution 31754, incorporating Filipino Town, and recognizing the important history and contributions of Filipino-Americans to the City of Seattle.Res 31769 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & Community +1.8 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Chinatown/International District; amending Resolution 31754, incorporating Filipino Town, and recognizing the important history and contributions of Filipino-Americans to the City of Seattle.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Voicing support for certain community-initiated projects contained in the Plan and identifying next steps for implementation of those projects.Res 31711 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Land Use & Development +1.8 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Equitable Development Implementation Plan and Equitable Development Financial Investment Strategy; voicing support for certain community-initiated projects contained in the Plan and identifying next steps for implementation of those projects.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Recognizing the extensive effort of the Rainier Beach neighborhood to update its vision and plan for the future of the neighborhood.Res 31710 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Arts, Culture & Community +1.8 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the extensive effort of the Rainier Beach neighborhood to update its vision and plan for the future of the neighborhood; to advance neighborhood priorities through the completion of the “Rainier Beach Neighborhood Plan Update,” a combined effort of the community and the City, that informs City policies, programs, and investments for those areas included in the Rainier Beach Neighborhood Plan Update.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Proposing that certain public-interest obligations be required of Comcast Corporation for its proposed merger with Time Warner Cable Incorporated in the event….Res 31569 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Utilities & Technology +1.8 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION proposing that certain public-interest obligations be required of Comcast Corporation for its proposed merger with Time Warner Cable Incorporated in the event the merger is approved by the Federal Communications Commission.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adopts the City of Seattle Privacy Principles governing the City’s operations, which will provide an ethical framework for dealing with current and….Res 31570 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & Democracy +1.8 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the City of Seattle Privacy Principles governing the City’s operations, which will provide an ethical framework for dealing with current and future technologies that impact privacy, and setting timelines for future reporting on the development of a Privacy Statement and Privacy Toolkit for their implementation.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget.CB 118999 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & Infrastructure +1.6 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the appropriations for the Seattle Department of Transportation; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget; and imposing a proviso.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Allowing for temporarily changing the committee meeting times.Res 31859 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & Finance +1.2 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2018 and 2019; allowing for temporarily changing the committee meeting times; and superseding Resolution 31789.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Expressing the City of Seattle’s intent to adopt a progressive income tax targeting high-income households.Res 31747 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +1.2 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the City of Seattle’s intent to adopt a progressive income tax targeting high-income households
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to the redevelopment of KeyArena into a first-class, state-of-the-art, multi-purpose entertainment and sport center (the “Arena”) at Seattle Center.Res 31764 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Labor & City Workforce +1.2 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the redevelopment of KeyArena into a first-class, state-of-the-art, multi-purpose entertainment and sport center (the “Arena”) at Seattle Center; supporting The City of Seattle negotiating with Oak View Group, LLC (OVG) regarding the possible redevelopment and operation of the Arena at Seattle Center; and requesting the Mayor to negotiate a memorandum of understanding with OVG for the City Council’s consideration and action.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requests the Executive and Council develop and participate in a community-led stakeholder engagement process to establish an Employee Hours Tax and/or other….SLI 335-1-D-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Labor & City Workforce +1.2 pts
Official titleRequesting the Executive and Council develop and participate in a community-led stakeholder engagement process to establish an Employee Hours Tax and/or other revenue tools
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Creation of Georgetown Public Safety Task Force.SLI 213-1-B-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & Justice +1.2 pts
Official titleCreation of Georgetown Public Safety Task Force
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Proclaiming the City of Seattle’s Support for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Opposition to the Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.Res 31709 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & Parks +1.2 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION proclaiming the City of Seattle’s Support for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Opposition to the Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Affirming the human right to privacy and expressing a desire that the policies and products of the City’s privacy initiative be consistent….Res 31598 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & Democracy +1.2 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming the human right to privacy and expressing a desire that the policies and products of the City’s privacy initiative be consistent with the right to privacy as described in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the applicable international human rights framework.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Implications for the City of Seattle, Workforce Development Council Report: Workforce Ecosystem Project.SLI 15-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Land Use & Development +1.0 pt
Official titleImplications for the City of Seattle, Workforce Development Council Report: Workforce Ecosystem Project
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
West Seattle Bridge Corridor Improvements.SLI 95-2-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Transportation & Infrastructure +1.0 pt
Official titleWest Seattle Bridge Corridor Improvements
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to submit application(s) for grant funding assistance for Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) project(s)….Res 31692 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.8 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to submit application(s) for grant funding assistance for Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board as provided in chapter 79A.25 RCW, Title 286 WAC, and other applicable authorities.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for Youth Athletic Facilities (YAF) project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board as….Res 31693 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.8 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for Youth Athletic Facilities (YAF) project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board as provided in chapter 79A.25 RCW, WAC 286, and other applicable authorities.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,250,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Race and Social Justice Initiative analysis of DON grant programs.SLI 20-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Civil Rights & Democracy +0.7 pts
Official titleRace and Social Justice Initiative analysis of DON grant programs
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that DPD analyze and prepare implementing legislation for a rezone for the intersection of 16th Ave SW and SW Holden Street….SLI 33-1-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.7 pts
Official titleRequest that DPD analyze and prepare implementing legislation for a rezone for the intersection of 16th Ave SW and SW Holden Street, including the former SCL Dumar Substation.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Report by Special Task Force on Chinatown/International District.SLI 80-1-A-4-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & Community +0.7 pts
Official titleReport by Special Task Force on Chinatown/International District
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requests Congress to allocate funding to adequately address the maintenance needs of the National Park System.Res 31737 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.7 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting Congress to allocate funding to adequately address the maintenance needs of the National Park System.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $510,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Transfers jurisdiction over the portion of Broad Street between Thomas Street and Taylor Avenue North from the Seattle Department of Transportation to….CB 119566 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.6 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Broad Street; transferring jurisdiction over the portion of Broad Street between Thomas Street and Taylor Avenue North from the Seattle Department of Transportation to the Seattle Center Department for purposes of constructing, operating, and maintaining a public skate plaza.
Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 0]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Explore expanding the 1% for Art Program by eliminating exclusions.SLI 50-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & Community +0.5 pts
Official titleExplore expanding the 1% for Art Program by eliminating exclusions.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to imposing a tax on engaging in the business of making retail sales of firearms and ammunition.CB 118437 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Economy & Small Business +0.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to imposing a tax on engaging in the business of making retail sales of firearms and ammunition; amending Sections 5.30.010, 5.30.060, 5.55.010, 5.55.040, 5.55.060, 5.55.150, 5.55.165, 5.55.220, and 5.55.230 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 5.50 to the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $177,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that Seattle City Light submit a monthly report about power outages.SLI 32-3-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Utilities & Technology +0.4 pts
Official titleRequest that Seattle City Light submit a monthly report about power outages
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Management Association to be effective….CB 119126 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City Workforce +0.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Management Association to be effective January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2019; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, by increasing appropriations to the Seattle Police Department for providing the 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 payments therefor; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $198,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Expressing regret for the anti-Chinese legislation passed by the Washington Territory and previous Seattle City Councils, recognizing the past and continuing contributions….Res 31605 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & Democracy +0.4 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing regret for the anti-Chinese legislation passed by the Washington Territory and previous Seattle City Councils, recognizing the past and continuing contributions of the Chinese to Seattle and reaffirming the City’s commitment to the civil rights of all people.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requests the United States Congress to pass the Equality Act to ensure that federal civil rights laws are fully inclusive of protections….Res 31738 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & Democracy +0.4 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting the United States Congress to pass the Equality Act to ensure that federal civil rights laws are fully inclusive of protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity or expression.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Related to the Duwamish Waterway Cleanup and the health of communities adjacent to the Lower Duwamish Waterway.Res 31567 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.4 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the Duwamish Waterway Cleanup and the health of communities adjacent to the Lower Duwamish Waterway.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requiring the reporting of lost and stolen firearms.CB 118436 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & Justice +0.3 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE requiring the reporting of lost and stolen firearms; and creating a new Chapter 10.78 of the Seattle Municipal Code.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $181,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 2, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Updates City employment.CB 118910 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City Workforce +0.3 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; amending Sections 4.20.055, 4.26.010, 4.27.010, 4.27.020, and 4.27.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adding a new Chapter 4.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code, consisting of Sections 4.29.010, 4.29.020, 4.29.030, 4.29.040, 4.29.050, 4.29.060, 4.29.070, 4.29.080, 4.29.090, and 4.29.100, all to provide additional Paid Parental Leave and a new Paid Family Care Leave benefit to eligible city employees; establishing other conditions of implementing the new leave benefits; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,600,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 1, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, creating and revising budget control levels, modifying positions, and changing appropriations to various departments….CB 118908 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & Appropriations +0.3 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, creating and revising budget control levels, modifying positions, and changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $893,532. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.
Factors [1, 1, 0, 2]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Adding a new Chapter 3.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).CB 118969 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & Justice +0.3 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to civilian and community oversight of the police; adding a new Chapter 3.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); recodifying Subchapters VII, VIII, and IX of Chapter 3.28 of the SMC as Subchapters I, II, and III of Chapter 3.29; amending or repealing sections in Chapters 3.28, 4.08, and 14.12 of the SMC; and concerning Ordinance 118482.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $350,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 2, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Create and outline an inclusive role of Boards and Commissions in the City Council Budget Review Process.SLI 296-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Government Operations & Finance +0.3 pts
Official titleCreate and outline an inclusive role of Boards and Commissions in the City Council Budget Review Process
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requests the Executive identify policy direction, steps forward and sources of funding for a viable, privately operated childcare facility on the City's….SLI 76-2-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Health & Human Services +0.3 pts
Official titleRequesting the Executive identify policy direction, steps forward and sources of funding for a viable, privately operated childcare facility on the City's downtown Civic Center campus
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that DEEL assess the feasibility of implementing the Washington State Opportunity Scholarship program in Seattle and report on progress.SLI DEEL-8-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that DEEL assess the feasibility of implementing the Washington State Opportunity Scholarship program in Seattle and report on progress
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that DON report on a strategy to develop a community-led place-based violence prevention initiative in Westwood and South Delridge.SLI DON-5-B-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that DON report on a strategy to develop a community-led place-based violence prevention initiative in Westwood and South Delridge
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
SPD smartphone business case.SLI 204-1-B-3-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & Justice +0.2 pts
Official titleSPD smartphone business case
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Requests that the Washington State Department of Transportation preserve one support pier associated with the Roanoke/R.H. Thomson Expressway.Res 31716 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.2 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting that the Washington State Department of Transportation preserve one support pier associated with the Roanoke/R.H. Thomson Expressway; stating the City Council’s intent to fund an engineering study of the pier’s structural integrity; and stating the City Council’s intent that the City accept ownership of the pier.
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request a report from CBO on the use and contracted cost of beds at the King County Jail and options for distribution….SLI CBO-4-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest a report from CBO on the use and contracted cost of beds at the King County Jail and options for distribution of services inside the King County Jail
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that SPD develop a reporting mechanism that accurately captures race data.SLI CJ-26-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that SPD develop a reporting mechanism that accurately captures race data
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that OSE establish high-road contracting standards for electrical contractors.SLI OSE-3-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OSE establish high-road contracting standards for electrical contractors
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Progress report from SPR on Green Seattle Partnership Program.SLI SPR-6-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.1 pts
Official titleProgress report from SPR on Green Seattle Partnership Program
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that SDOT report on current maintenance spending for bicycle infrastructure.SLI SDOT-2-C-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that SDOT report on current maintenance spending for bicycle infrastructure
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request the City Auditor conduct a review of Seattle Municipal Court's probation program.SLI CJ-1-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest the City Auditor conduct a review of Seattle Municipal Court's probation program
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Monthly presentation to the Human Services and Public Health Committee regarding the Mayor's interim action plan for homelessness.SLI 249-1-A-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Health & Human Services +0.1 pts
Official titleMonthly presentation to the Human Services and Public Health Committee regarding the Mayor's interim action plan for homelessness
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that LAW report on expanding prefiling diversion opportunities to those over age 25.SLI CJ-24-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that LAW report on expanding prefiling diversion opportunities to those over age 25
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request a report from HSD on subsidizing transit passes for employees of HSD contracted service providers.SLI HSD-5-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest a report from HSD on subsidizing transit passes for employees of HSD contracted service providers
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that OED provide recommendations regarding the creation of a film commission.SLI OED-10-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small Business +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OED provide recommendations regarding the creation of a film commission
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request SCL to report on SCL Strategic Planning in accordance with Seattle's Green New Deal Resolution (RES 31895).SLI SCL-2-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Utilities & Technology +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest SCL to report on SCL Strategic Planning in accordance with Seattle's Green New Deal Resolution (RES 31895)
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
Request that OED create strategies to connect developers with small businesses and service providers.SLI OED-2-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small Business +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OED create strategies to connect developers with small businesses and service providers
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional