Representation unavailable

Abel Pacheco

Former councilmember · 2019–2019

Status
Former councilmember
Representation
Representation unavailable

Overview and record

Activity at a glance

2015–2026 official records

Abel Pacheco received credit for 30 passed matters in 2015–2026, earning 39.1 points—within the available comparison group. The largest single contribution is CB 119505 (2019), worth 4.0 points: Updates land use and zoning. The credited record is concentrated in Land Use & Development, especially zoning. Of those, 5 originated in an executive department before Council sponsorship.

2015–2026 LegisRate points

39.1

Within the available comparison group

5 credited measures originated in an executive department.

How scoring works

Outcome, voting, and attendance describe the record; they do not add to or subtract from the LegisRate score.

Sponsored outcomes 30 passed

100.0% passage rate

Final voting choices 217 in favor

3 opposed · 0 abstained

Full Council attendance 96.6% present or late

28 of 29 records

Sponsorship record12 prime · 18 co-sponsor · 30 early-recorded

Record details Outcome, voting, attendance, and sponsorship context
Sponsored outcomes0 unsuccessful · 0 pendingPending measures are not included in the passage rate.
Final voting choices220 recorded decisions1.4% opposed · 0.0% abstained · 1 not voting
Votes on contested matters6 recorded choices3 supported · 3 opposed
Attendance detail25 present · 3 late1 excused · 0 unexcused. Excused absences remain visible and are not treated as unexcused.
Sponsorship timing30 early · 0 after committee · 0 after passageFirst appearance in the official sponsor record.
Council-wide voting context93.4% without recorded opposition or abstention2904 of 3109 eligible final tallies; 205 contested.

Only the latest recorded legislative vote per matter is used; a missing structured tally is not counted as an absence.

What the work concerns

Policy-area mix

Share of scored work

Abel Pacheco's policy-area mix Hover or focus a policy-area slice for its point total and share of scored work. 39.1 points

Hover or focus a slice for detail.

Land Use & Development

27.4 points · 70.1%

View related bills

By year

Annual work

YearPointsPassedPass rateOriginalCo-sponsoredOpposedAbstainedAttendance
201939.130100.030181.40.096.6
Career total39.130100.030181.40.096.6

Rates are shown only when the relevant official record exists. Vote and attendance measures describe participation; they do not affect points.

Council roles

Committees & positions

Point-by-point audit

Contributing bills

Open filtered explorer
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119505 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentZoningNeighborhoods +4.0 pts

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.41.010 and 23.41.012 of the Seattle Municipal Code to remove the Ballard Municipal Center Master Plan Area Guidelines and adopt the Ballard Neighborhood Design Guidelines, and delete reference to the Ballard Municipal Center Master Plan Area Guidelines.

ZoningNeighborhoods

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $17,176. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional

(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share9 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125843
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119506 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentZoningNeighborhoods +4.0 pts

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.41.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code to approve the Capitol Hill Neighborhood Design Guidelines, 2019.

ZoningNeighborhoods

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $17,174. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional

(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share9 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125844
Related to conforming City code to match provisions of state law for rental housing inspections.CB 119546 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to conforming City code to match provisions of state law for rental housing inspections; and amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 22.214.050.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional

(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share8 in favor · 0 opposedaffected service or requested subjectSigned ordinance 125851
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119597 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentZoningHistoric Preservation +4.0 pts

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.41.012, 23.48.220, 23.48.225, and 23.48.245 of the Seattle Municipal Code, to revise existing regulatory incentives to preserve open space and allow departures from tower separation requirements when the project includes a Landmark that is subject to Landmark controls and incentives adopted by the City Council.

ZoningHistoric Preservation

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional

(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share8 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125927
Updates land use and zoning, amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 60 and 61 of the Official Land….CB 119651 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods +4.0 pts

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 60 and 61 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 4730 15th Avenue NE from Lowrise 3 (M) (LR3 (M)) to Neighborhood Commercial 2-65 (M1) (NC2-65 (M1)), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Matt Driscoll, C.F. 314359, SDCI Project 3025193-LU)

ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional

(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share6 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125933
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 159 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 119664 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods +4.0 pts

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 159 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 5256 Rainier Avenue S from Neighborhood Commercial 2-55 (M) (NC2-55 (M)) to Neighborhood Commercial 2-65 (M1) (NC2-65 (M1)); and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Kathleen Justice, C.F. 314365, SDCI Project 3025493-LU)

ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional

(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share7 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125962
Affirming the rezone approved through Ordinance 125640.CB 119511 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts +3.0 pts

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; affirming the rezone approved through Ordinance 125640; and accepting an amended Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Remand of the approval granted through C.F. 314356 of a rezone application by 70th & Greenwood Ave, LLC, C.F. 314425, SDCI Project 3023260)

ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional

(2 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share8 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125820
Updates environmental review.CB 119600 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentPermitting & Development +2.4 pts

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to environmental review; amending Sections 3.02.110, 25.05.035, 25.05.055, 25.05.070, 25.05.100, 25.05.440, 25.05.448, 25.05.545, 25.05.680, 25.05.800, 25.05.900, and 25.05.914 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify timelines and the content of administrative appeals, to authorize the development of Director’s Rules to clarify the content of environmental documents, and to make corrections and technical amendments.

Permitting & Development

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional

(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 60%Original sponsor · primary share8 in favor · 0 opposedaffected service identified in operative titleSigned ordinance 125964
Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2020 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community….Res 31896 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentPermitting & Development +2.0 pts

Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2020 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Planning Commission review and make recommendations about the proposed amendments.

Permitting & Development

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional

(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share8 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned resolution 31896
Request that DEEL report on data collection, disaggregation, and usage.SLI DEEL-10-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +2.0 pts

Official titleRequest that DEEL report on data collection, disaggregation, and usage

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional

(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record