100.0% passage rate
Representation unavailable
Abel Pacheco
Former councilmember · 2019–2019
Total in available record · LegisRate points
39.12015–2026 records · source checked Oct 8, 2026
30 sponsored measures adopted in the available record.
Service: 2019–2019. Coverage is limited to 2015–2026.
How scoring worksOverview and record
Background and tenure
Former councilmember · recorded terms: 2019–2019. The legislative record shown here covers 2015–2026.
Abel Pacheco Jr. is a Seattle politician who briefly represented District 4 after being appointed to the City Council. Raised in Los Angeles in a family of Mexican immigrants, he studied political science and public affairs and worked at the Seattle Foundation, Seattle Police Foundation, and University of Washington before entering city government.
Pacheco was appointed to District 4 and served briefly before the 2019 election. His interim tenure followed work in civic engagement, public safety, higher education, and Seattle community organizations.
Background summary adapted from Wikipedia; it is separate from the LegisRate record and score.
Full available record · 2015–2026
Activity record
30 sponsored measures adopted; present or late in 28 of 29 Full Council attendance records.
Outcome, voting, and attendance describe the record; they do not add to or subtract from the LegisRate score.
3 opposed · 0 abstained
28 of 29 records
Sponsorship record12 prime · 18 co-sponsor · 30 early-recorded
Record details Outcome, voting, attendance, and sponsorship context
Sponsored outcomes0 unsuccessful · 0 pendingPending measures are not included in the passage rate.
Final voting choices220 recorded decisions1.4% opposed · 0.0% abstained · 1 not voting
Votes on contested matters6 recorded choices3 supported · 3 opposed
Attendance detail25 present · 3 late1 excused · 0 unexcused. Excused absences remain visible and are not treated as unexcused.
Sponsorship timing30 early · 0 after committee · 0 after passageFirst appearance in the official sponsor record.
Council-wide voting context93.4% without recorded opposition or abstention2912 of 3119 eligible final tallies; 207 contested.
Only the latest recorded legislative vote per matter is used; a missing structured tally is not counted as an absence.
Separate public records · non-scoring context
Financial information
Campaign contributions show money given to a campaign. Personal disclosure filings list reported income, investments and financial interests, often in broad ranges. These records do not estimate personal wealth or establish donor influence.
Campaign contributions
Reviewed2015 Council District 4
Selected campaign's reported and SEEC-coded contributions; amendments can change this snapshot.
Checked Oct 12, 2026
Donor list ranks reported donor names by direct private cash and in-kind contributions, net of audited corrections. Vouchers, candidate funding, loans and independent expenditures are separate.
Top 20 reported donor names
Equal amounts share a rank; names are alphabetical within a tie. The list includes ties at the cutoff.
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · ABEL PACHECO SR $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · BEN YARBROUGH $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · BOBBY TEW $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · CONOR BRONSDON $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · DANIEL ORDONEZ DESIGN $700.00 total Cash $0.00 · in-kind $700.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · JAMES H PILKINGTON $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · KAREN T MONTIEL $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · LARRY COMBS $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · MARIA C TEW $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · MARIA WATKINS $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · MICHAEL DUNN $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · NORMA E LOPEZ $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · RAUL LOPEZ $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · ROGER WATKINS $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · SANTA LOPEZ $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · SEATTLE POLICE GUILD $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Tied rank 1 (17 names) · SUZANNE M BURKE $700.00 total Cash $700.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Rank 18 · VALARIE HUNT $500.00 total Cash $500.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Rank 19 · DANIEL DUEBALL $350.00 total Cash $350.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
- Rank 20 · CHRISTOPHER VELTRI $300.00 total Cash $300.00 · in-kind $0.00 · audited corrections $0.00
Names are grouped only by official contributor ID. Similar names, households and employers are not combined based on assumptions.
Campaign funding breakdown
- Candidate self-financing$3,696.68
- Direct private cash and in-kind, net of audited corrections$17,636.00
- Unitemized contributions$305.00
Sources and coverage
Selected campaign's reported and SEEC-coded contributions; amendments can change this snapshot.
One election cycle; primary and general are combined. This is not a lifetime total.
Contributor names follow public campaign filing IDs; reported names are not inferred identities.
Vouchers, candidate funding, loans and other receipts are separate from the donor ranking.
Independent expenditures are outside the candidate donor list.
This is a dated snapshot; later filings or amendments can change amounts.
Independent expenditures are not included in this donor list; this does not mean none were reported. Separate from direct candidate donors; deferred in this pilot. Check the separate SEEC record
Personal financial disclosure
Filing copy unavailableLatest indexed PDC statement received 2015-05-15 covers 2014-05-15 through 2015-05-14; its official link requires an agency records request. Actual statement unavailable under this no-request audit; index dates do not support financial-content claims. No newer indexed filing found in the bounded verified-person query. This historical gap is not a none finding.
Checked Oct 12, 2026
Washington PDC Personal Financial Affairs (F-1) · official filing index
Indexed reporting year 2015 · May 15, 2014 to May 14, 2015 · received May 15, 2015
No financial values are shown here.
Sources and coverage
Latest indexed PDC statement received 2015-05-15 covers 2014-05-15 through 2015-05-14; its official link requires an agency records request. Actual statement unavailable under this no-request audit; index dates do not support financial-content claims. No newer indexed filing found in the bounded verified-person query. This historical gap is not a none finding.
No actual personal financial statement was reviewed. Index identity and dates are not evidence of income, assets, liabilities, ownership, compliance, conflict or net worth.
No financial-content rows, contacts, addresses, signatures or family information are retained from inaccessible filings.
Indexed-only access gap; no request, credentials, access bypass or substitute financial claim.
Latest index record may predate later Seattle service; no newer record is inferred from that service.
PDC indexed filing: request-only actual copy · checked Oct 12, 2026: Latest indexed PDC statement received 2015-05-15 covers 2014-05-15 through 2015-05-14; its official link requires an agency records request. Actual statement unavailable under this no-request audit; index dates do not support financial-content claims. No newer indexed filing found in the bounded verified-person query. This historical gap is not a none finding. Source
SEEC separate local F-1 statements · checked Oct 12, 2026: SEEC directs readers to contact its office for statement copies. No request made. Source
What the work concerns
Policy-area mix
Land Use & Development accounts for the largest share of points in the full 2015–2026 record: 27.4 points (70.1%).
Hover or focus a slice for detail.
Land Use & Development
27.4 points · 70.1%Housing & Homelessness
4.2 points · 10.6%Health & Human Services
3.5 points · 8.9%Public Safety & Justice
2.8 points · 7.3%Other smaller areas
1.2 points · 3.1%Individual areas below 1% are grouped here only so the chart stays readable.
- Environment, Climate & Parks0.3 points · 0.9%
- Transportation & Infrastructure0.3 points · 0.7%
- Economy & Small Business0.2 points · 0.5%
- Labor & City Workforce0.1 points · 0.3%
- Civil Rights & Democracy0.1 points · 0.3%
- Utilities & Technology0.1 points · 0.3%
By year
Annual work
In 2019, 30 sponsored measures were adopted, contributing 39.1 points.
Full annual history · 2015–2026. Points use the measure’s introduction year.
| Year | Points | Sponsored measures adopted |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 39.1 | 30 |
| Total in available record | 39.1 | 30 |
Year-by-year participation and sponsorship details
| Year | Points | Passed | Pass rate | Original | Co-sponsored | Opposed | Abstained | Attendance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 39.1 | 30 | 100.0 | 30 | 18 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 96.6 |
| Total in available record | 39.1 | 30 | 100.0 | 30 | 18 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 96.6 |
Rates are shown only when the relevant official record exists. Vote and attendance measures describe participation; they do not affect points.
Council roles
Committees & positions
8 committee assignments available for recorded service.
- ChairPlanning, Land Use, and Zoning Committee
- Vice ChairSustainability and Transportation Committee
- AlternateCivil Rights, Utilities, Economic Development, and Arts Committee
- MemberGender Equity, Safe Communities, New Americans, and Education Committee
- ChairSelect Committee on Citywide Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA)
- MemberSelect Budget Committee
- MemberSelect Committee on Civic Arenas
- MemberSelect Committee on Homelessness and Housing Affordability
Point-by-point audit
Contributing bills
30 adopted measures contribute to the full 2015–2026 total. Bills are listed by credited points.
Open filtered explorerUpdates land use and zoning.CB 119505 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.41.010 and 23.41.012 of the Seattle Municipal Code to remove the Ballard Municipal Center Master Plan Area Guidelines and adopt the Ballard Neighborhood Design Guidelines, and delete reference to the Ballard Municipal Center Master Plan Area Guidelines.
ZoningNeighborhoods
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $17,176. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share9 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125843
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119506 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.41.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code to approve the Capitol Hill Neighborhood Design Guidelines, 2019.
ZoningNeighborhoods
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $17,174. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share9 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125844
Related to conforming City code to match provisions of state law for rental housing inspections.CB 119546 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & Homelessness +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to conforming City code to match provisions of state law for rental housing inspections; and amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 22.214.050.
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share8 in favor · 0 opposedaffected service or requested subjectSigned ordinance 125851
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119597 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.41.012, 23.48.220, 23.48.225, and 23.48.245 of the Seattle Municipal Code, to revise existing regulatory incentives to preserve open space and allow departures from tower separation requirements when the project includes a Landmark that is subject to Landmark controls and incentives adopted by the City Council.
ZoningHistoric Preservation
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share8 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125927
Updates land use and zoning, amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 60 and 61 of the Official Land….CB 119651 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 60 and 61 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 4730 15th Avenue NE from Lowrise 3 (M) (LR3 (M)) to Neighborhood Commercial 2-65 (M1) (NC2-65 (M1)), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Matt Driscoll, C.F. 314359, SDCI Project 3025193-LU)
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share6 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125933
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 159 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 119664 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +4.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 159 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 5256 Rainier Avenue S from Neighborhood Commercial 2-55 (M) (NC2-55 (M)) to Neighborhood Commercial 2-65 (M1) (NC2-65 (M1)); and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Kathleen Justice, C.F. 314365, SDCI Project 3025493-LU)
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share7 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125962
Affirming the rezone approved through Ordinance 125640.CB 119511 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +3.0 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; affirming the rezone approved through Ordinance 125640; and accepting an amended Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Remand of the approval granted through C.F. 314356 of a rezone application by 70th & Greenwood Ave, LLC, C.F. 314425, SDCI Project 3023260)
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(2 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share8 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned ordinance 125820
Updates environmental review.CB 119600 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +2.4 pts
Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to environmental review; amending Sections 3.02.110, 25.05.035, 25.05.055, 25.05.070, 25.05.100, 25.05.440, 25.05.448, 25.05.545, 25.05.680, 25.05.800, 25.05.900, and 25.05.914 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify timelines and the content of administrative appeals, to authorize the development of Director’s Rules to clarify the content of environmental documents, and to make corrections and technical amendments.
Permitting & Development
Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [1, 0, 1, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(3 factors + 1 sponsor) × 60%Original sponsor · primary share8 in favor · 0 opposedaffected service identified in operative titleSigned ordinance 125964
Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2020 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community….Res 31896 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Land Use & Development +2.0 pts
Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2020 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Planning Commission review and make recommendations about the proposed amendments.
Permitting & Development
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary share8 in favor · 0 opposedland-use or development actionSigned resolution 31896
Request that DEEL report on data collection, disaggregation, and usage.SLI DEEL-10-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +2.0 pts
Official titleRequest that DEEL report on data collection, disaggregation, and usage
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request that SPD, in conjunction with other City departments, lead an examination of the Charge By Officer (CBO) program.SLI SPD-1-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +2.0 pts
Official titleRequest that SPD, in conjunction with other City departments, lead an examination of the Charge By Officer (CBO) program
Police
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 100%Original sponsor · primary shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request that DEEL assess the feasibility of implementing the Washington State Opportunity Scholarship program in Seattle and report on progress.SLI DEEL-8-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +1.2 pts
Official titleRequest that DEEL assess the feasibility of implementing the Washington State Opportunity Scholarship program in Seattle and report on progress
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 60%Original sponsor · primary shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request that DON report on long-term funding opportunities to preserve and enhance P-Patches.SLI DON-4-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that DON report on long-term funding opportunities to preserve and enhance P-Patches
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 10%Original sponsor · co-sponsor sharehistorical conservation, pollution, climate, or parks actionOfficial record
Request that DON report on a strategy to develop a community-led place-based violence prevention initiative in Westwood and South Delridge.SLI DON-5-B-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that DON report on a strategy to develop a community-led place-based violence prevention initiative in Westwood and South Delridge
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 10%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request a report on sites for a tiny home village.SLI HOM-4-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Housing & Homelessness +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest a report on sites for a tiny home village
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 8%Original sponsor · co-sponsor sharehistorical rental, housing-repair, shelter, or encampment actionOfficial record
Request that HSD report on contracts with American Indian and Alaska Native organizations.SLI HSD-1-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +0.2 pts
Official titleRequest that HSD report on contracts with American Indian and Alaska Native organizations
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 8%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request that CBO develop a proposal for a compensation program for Boards and Commissions volunteers.SLI CBO-3-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Labor & City Workforce +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that CBO develop a proposal for a compensation program for Boards and Commissions volunteers
Compensation & Benefits
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 6%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareemployment or labor actionOfficial record
Request a report from CBO on the use and contracted cost of beds at the King County Jail and options for distribution….SLI CBO-4-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest a report from CBO on the use and contracted cost of beds at the King County Jail and options for distribution of services inside the King County Jail
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 6%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request that OCR spend a portion of its $1 million in its 2020 Proposed Budget on community-based organizations to create restorative justice….SLI CJ-6-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Civil Rights & Democracy +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OCR spend a portion of its $1 million in its 2020 Proposed Budget on community-based organizations to create restorative justice approaches to individuals committing hate crimes
Budget & Appropriations
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 6%Original sponsor · co-sponsor sharehistorical civil-rights, equity, election, or inclusion actionOfficial record
Request that Seattle Municipal Court report back to Council on how it would implement high-barrier probation.SLI CJ-7-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that Seattle Municipal Court report back to Council on how it would implement high-barrier probation
Courts & Legal Enforcement
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 6%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request that Executive departments report on reentry recommendations regarding increasing economic opportunities.SLI CJ-21-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that Executive departments report on reentry recommendations regarding increasing economic opportunities
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 6%Original sponsor · co-sponsor sharehistorical emergency, justice-system, firearm, or safety-code actionOfficial record
Request that OSE establish high-road contracting standards for electrical contractors.SLI OSE-3-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OSE establish high-road contracting standards for electrical contractors
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 6%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Progress report from SPR on Green Seattle Partnership Program.SLI SPR-6-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & Parks +0.1 pts
Official titleProgress report from SPR on Green Seattle Partnership Program
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 6%Original sponsor · co-sponsor sharehistorical conservation, pollution, climate, or parks actionOfficial record
Request that SDOT report on current maintenance spending for bicycle infrastructure.SLI SDOT-2-C-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & Infrastructure +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that SDOT report on current maintenance spending for bicycle infrastructure
Traffic Safety
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 6%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request the City Auditor conduct a review of Seattle Municipal Court's probation program.SLI CJ-1-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest the City Auditor conduct a review of Seattle Municipal Court's probation program
Courts & Legal Enforcement
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 6%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request that LAW report on expanding prefiling diversion opportunities to those over age 25.SLI CJ-24-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & Justice +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that LAW report on expanding prefiling diversion opportunities to those over age 25
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 5%Original sponsor · co-sponsor sharehistorical emergency, justice-system, firearm, or safety-code actionOfficial record
Request a report from HSD on subsidizing transit passes for employees of HSD contracted service providers.SLI HSD-5-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human Services +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest a report from HSD on subsidizing transit passes for employees of HSD contracted service providers
Transit
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 5%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request that OED provide recommendations regarding the creation of a film commission.SLI OED-10-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small Business +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OED provide recommendations regarding the creation of a film commission
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 5%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record
Request SCL to report on SCL Strategic Planning in accordance with Seattle's Green New Deal Resolution (RES 31895).SLI SCL-2-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Utilities & Technology +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest SCL to report on SCL Strategic Planning in accordance with Seattle's Green New Deal Resolution (RES 31895)
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 5%Original sponsor · co-sponsor sharehistorical utility, communications, or electrical-system actionOfficial record
Request that OED create strategies to connect developers with small businesses and service providers.SLI OED-2-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small Business +0.1 pts
Official titleRequest that OED create strategies to connect developers with small businesses and service providers
Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.
Factors [0, 0, 0, 1]reach · fiscal · durability · institutional
(1 factors + 1 sponsor) × 5%Original sponsor · co-sponsor shareaffected service or requested subjectOfficial record