Bill explorer

Find a bill

Search a name, subject or bill number. Open a result for its action, sponsors, vote and official record.

More filters

Where a proposal started describes the institution listed in the official record. It does not establish who wrote it. “Start not clear” means that institution is not established by the available source.

3431 of 3431 bills shown
Sends voters a seven-year property-tax levy supporting libraries, technology, programming, maintenance, and seismic work.CB 121181 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandLibraries & Community FacilitiesElections Up to 9 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sends voters a seven-year property-tax levy supporting libraries, technology, programming, maintenance, and seismic work.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127419April 21, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandLibraries & Community FacilitiesElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to regular property taxes; providing for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on August 4, 2026, of a proposition authorizing the City to levy regular property taxes for up to seven years in excess of the limitation on levies in chapter 84.55 RCW for the purpose of sustaining investments in Library operating hours, collections, technology, programming, and maintenance while expanding access to opportunity through Library materials, technology, and undertaking a seismic retrofit of one Library facility; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $410,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedThe Seattle Public Library. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value9
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Sends voters a proposed sales tax to fund Seattle transit and related transportation programs.CB 121226 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitTaxes, Revenue & DebtElections Up to 9 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sends voters a proposed sales tax to fund Seattle transit and related transportation programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127474July 30, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitTaxes, Revenue & DebtElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to a sales and use tax; providing for the submission to qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 3, 2026, a proposition to collect a sales and use tax to fund transit and related transportation programs in Seattle; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,380,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation (SDOT). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value9
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a sales-and-use-tax deferral for converting underused commercial property into housing.CB 120937 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 9 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a sales-and-use-tax deferral for converting underused commercial property into housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127181February 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMark Solomon, Sara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxes; creating a new sales and use tax deferral for the conversion of underutilized commercial property to housing; and adding a new Chapter 5.75 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $140,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value9
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides for the submission to qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 3, 2020, a proposition….CB 119833 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitTaxes, Revenue & DebtElections Up to 9 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides for the submission to qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 3, 2020, a proposition….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126115July 31, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitTaxes, Revenue & DebtElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a sales and use tax; providing for the submission to qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 3, 2020, a proposition to collect a sales and use tax to fund transit and related transportation programs in Seattle.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $169,500,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value9
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on August 6, 2019, a….CB 119491 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandLibraries & Community FacilitiesElections Up to 9 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on August 6, 2019, a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125809April 26, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandLibraries & Community FacilitiesElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to regular property taxes; providing for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on August 6, 2019, a proposition to lift the limit on regular property taxes under chapter 84.55 RCW and authorize the City to levy additional taxes for up to seven years for the purpose of sustaining investments in Library operating hours, collections, technology, and maintenance while expanding access to opportunity through additional hours, Library materials, and technology and undertaking seismic retrofits of three Library facilities; authorizing creation of a new fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $213,300,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedThe Seattle Public Library. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value9
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle's cable-television franchise agreement with Comcast and its administration rules.CB 121163 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle's cable-television franchise agreement with Comcast and its administration rules.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127409March 31, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to cable television; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to execute an amendment to the Cable Television Franchise Agreement with Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, authorized by Ordinance 124957; authorizing the Chief Technology Officer to enter into other agreements for the purpose of implementing or administering the amended franchise; amending Section 21.60.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $29,334,798. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle IT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle's stormwater rules for development, roads, utilities, treatment, and infiltration.CB 121190 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle's stormwater rules for development, roads, utilities, treatment, and infiltration.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127444June 4, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the 2026 Stormwater Code Update; updating stormwater control requirements for development, roadways, utilities, and maintenance activities; strengthening stormwater treatment and infiltration standards; clarifying vesting and review thresholds; ensuring the City’s compliance with requirements of the City’s 2024-2029 Phase 1 Municipal Stormwater Permit issued by the State Department of Ecology; and amending Chapters 22.800, 22.801, 22.802, 22.803, 22.805, and 22.807 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,800,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves proposed charter changes governing Seattle's voter-created Social Housing Developer.Res 32209 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable Housing Up to 7 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves proposed charter changes governing Seattle's voter-created Social Housing Developer.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 18, 2026
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution approving the proposed charter amendments recommended by the board of the Seattle Social Housing Developer.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Raises the income limit for discounted water, electricity, drainage, wastewater, and waste services.CB 121222 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originElectricityWater & WastewaterSolid Waste Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Raises the income limit for discounted water, electricity, drainage, wastewater, and waste services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127468July 17, 2026
Official sponsorsDan Strauss, Joy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityWater & WastewaterSolid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the Utility Discount Program; amending the income threshold for the utility discount program for water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, and electric utility services; and amending Sections 21.49.040 and 21.76.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates City Light rates and service rules for data centers and updates other customer charges.CB 121231 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates City Light rates and service rules for data centers and updates other customer charges.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127473July 22, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the City Light Department; establishing new retail rate schedules; establishing a new customer class and conditions of service for data centers whose electricity demand constitutes a new large load; modifying customer charges for service connections; augmenting the rate stabilization account mechanism; amending Sections 21.49.020, 21.49.030, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.058, 21.49.060, 21.49.065, 21.49.083, 21.49.086, 21.49.110, and 21.49.130 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Section 21.49.059 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 21.49.081 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $245,441,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises Seattle water rates and increases credits available to qualifying low-income customers.CB 121245 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises Seattle water rates and increases credits available to qualifying low-income customers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127486August 6, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to rates and charges for water services of Seattle Public Utilities; revising water rates and charges; revising credits to low-income customers; authorizing withdrawal of funds from the Water Fund Revenue Stabilization Subfund; and amending Sections 21.04.430, 21.04.440, and 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises department funding, projects, positions, and spending conditions in Seattle's adopted 2026 budget.CB 121253 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises department funding, projects, positions, and spending conditions in Seattle's adopted 2026 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127496August 14, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance amending Ordinance 127362, which adopted the 2026 Budget, including the 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2026-2031 CIP; adding CIP Projects; creating positions; modifying positions; lifting provisos; modifying provisos, imposing provisos; amending Section 2 of Ordinance 127356 to effectuate a transfer; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $94,470,502. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Prohibits covered retailers from using personal data to set individualized prices for groceries and other essential goods.CB 121267 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originCivil Rights Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Prohibits covered retailers from using personal data to set individualized prices for groceries and other essential goods.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127515October 5, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to prohibiting algorithmic-based price discrimination; requiring covered retailer disclosures to consumers; requiring that covered retailers retain certain records; and adding a new Chapter 7.35 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the ordinance directly protects Seattle consumers citywide by regulating covered retailers' individualized pricing of groceries and essential goods. Fiscal 0: the official fiscal note identifies a one-time $175,000 implementation cost, below 0.01% of the adopted City budget. Durability 2: the ordinance adds a lasting regulatory chapter to the Seattle Municipal Code. Institutional scope 2: implementation spans FAS rulemaking and City Attorney enforcement, alongside a private right of action.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Sends voters a ten-year property-tax levy funding Seattle’s Democracy Voucher program.CB 120957 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElectionsAccessibility Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sends voters a ten-year property-tax levy funding Seattle’s Democracy Voucher program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127204April 23, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectionsAccessibility
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to publicly-financed election campaigns; providing for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on August 5, 2025, of a proposition authorizing the City to levy regular property taxes for up to ten years in excess of the limitation on levies in chapter 84.55 RCW for the purpose of funding the cost and administration of the City’s Democracy Voucher program and other City purposes; outlining a process for contemplation of changes to the program; applying RCW 84.36.381’s senior citizens and disabled persons exemption to such levy; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $45,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Consolidates and updates utility system-development charges for water, sewer, and drainage infrastructure.CB 120966 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Consolidates and updates utility system-development charges for water, sewer, and drainage infrastructure.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127223June 6, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; revising, consolidating, and enacting provisions related to system development charges for water, sewer, and drainage infrastructure; adding a new Subtitle VI to Title 21 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Chapter 21.65 to the subtitle; adding a new Section 21.65.010 to the Seattle Municipal Code; relocating Sections 21.04.105, 21.04.115, and 21.04.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code into the chapter and further amending the sections; and amending Section 21.04.465 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,700,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an increase in regular Seattle property taxes collected in 2026.CB 121120 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an increase in regular Seattle property taxes collected in 2026.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127355November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2026, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2025; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $209,716,667. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCBO. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Sends an eight-year transportation property-tax levy to Seattle voters and creates oversight.CB 120788 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment AccountabilityElections Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sends an eight-year transportation property-tax levy to Seattle voters and creates oversight.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127053July 10, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment AccountabilityElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to transportation; providing for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 5, 2024, a proposition authorizing the City to levy regular property taxes for up to eight years in excess of the limitation on levies in chapter 84.55 RCW for the purpose of providing City facilities and services, including transportation improvements, both capital and operating, with possible debt financing; creating a new oversight committee; applying RCW 84.36.381’s senior citizens and disabled persons exemption; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,450,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an increase in Seattle's regular property-tax levy for 2025.CB 120907 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an increase in Seattle's regular property-tax levy for 2025.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127153November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2025, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2024; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $187,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCBO. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares intent to offer a sales-tax deferral for commercial-to-housing conversions.Res 32156 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 7 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares intent to offer a sales-tax deferral for commercial-to-housing conversions.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 19, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring intention to establish a new sales and use tax deferral for the conversion of underutilized commercial property to housing.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $140,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising water rates and charges, and credits to low-income customers.CB 120657 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising water rates and charges, and credits to low-income customers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126909October 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to rates and charges for water services of Seattle Public Utilities; revising water rates and charges, and credits to low-income customers; and amending Sections 21.04.430, 21.04.440, and 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,804,200. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2024, representing an increase above the regular….CB 120695 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2024, representing an increase above the regular….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126948December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2024, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2023; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $138,608,596. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCBO. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes and imposing greenhouse gas emissions intensity targets and reporting requirements.CB 120718 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originClimate Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes and imposing greenhouse gas emissions intensity targets and reporting requirements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126959December 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Climate
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to regulating greenhouse gas emissions in larger existing nonresidential and multifamily buildings; establishing and imposing greenhouse gas emissions intensity targets and reporting requirements; prescribing penalties; adding a new Chapter 22.925 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Sections 22.920.010, 22.920.020, 22.920.030, 22.920.120, 22.920.130, 22.920.170, 22.930.010, 22.930.020, 22.930.040, 22.930.050, 22.930.120, 22.930.140, and 22.930.180 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 22.920.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $80,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOSE. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising water rates and charges, and credits to low-income customers.CB 120130 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising water rates and charges, and credits to low-income customers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126434September 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to rates and charges for water services of Seattle Public Utilities; revising water rates and charges, and credits to low-income customers; and amending Sections 21.04.430, 21.04.440, and 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,012,801. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Imposes a payroll expense tax on persons engaging in business in Seattle.CB 119810 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Imposes a payroll expense tax on persons engaging in business in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126108July 17, 2020
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; imposing a payroll expense tax on persons engaging in business in Seattle; adding a new Chapter 5.38 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 5.30.010, 5.30.060, 5.55.010, 5.55.040, 5.55.060, 5.55.150, 5.55.165, 5.55.220, 5.55.230, and 6.208.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Declares The City of Seattle’s resolve to work with King County on a future countywide transit measure, pursue progressive revenue options to….Res 31960 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransitTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 7 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Declares The City of Seattle’s resolve to work with King County on a future countywide transit measure, pursue progressive revenue options to….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 5, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Alex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitTaxes, Revenue & Debtfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to transit funding; declaring The City of Seattle’s resolve to work with King County on a future countywide transit measure, pursue progressive revenue options to replace the sales and use tax, and focus on equity and sustainability concerns.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the structured action creates broad revenue or appropriation authority. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes a revenue measure of 0.15 percent sales and use tax for transportation purposes as authorized by Seattle voters at the November….CB 119959 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & DebtElections Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes a revenue measure of 0.15 percent sales and use tax for transportation purposes as authorized by Seattle voters at the November….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126250December 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & DebtElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE imposing a revenue measure of 0.15 percent sales and use tax for transportation purposes as authorized by Seattle voters at the November 3, 2020 election; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $294,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes a local sales and use tax to fund investments in affordable and supportive housing.CB 119590 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Imposes a local sales and use tax to fund investments in affordable and supportive housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125887August 14, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; imposing a local sales and use tax to fund investments in affordable and supportive housing; adding new Sections 5.60.025 and 5.60.027 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Section 5.60.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2020, representing an increase above the regular….CB 119692 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2020, representing an increase above the regular….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126002December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2020, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2019; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $565,630,653. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes a tax on transportation network companies.CB 119684 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes a tax on transportation network companies.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125971December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; imposing a tax on transportation network companies; adding a new Chapter 5.39 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 5.30.010, 5.30.060, 5.55.010, 5.55.040, 5.55.060, 5.55.150, 5.55.165, 5.55.220, and 5.55.230 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,911,013. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 5.37 and a new Chapter 5.38 to Title 5 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119250 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adding a new Chapter 5.37 and a new Chapter 5.38 to Title 5 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125578May 21, 2018
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; adding a new Chapter 5.37 and a new Chapter 5.38 to Title 5 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 5.30.010, 5.30.060, 5.55.010, 5.55.040, 5.55.060, 5.55.150, 5.55.165, 5.55.220, and 5.55.230 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $75,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Repealing Ordinance 125578 relating to adding a new Chapter 5.37 (Employee Hours Tax) and a new Chapter 5.38 to Title 5 of….CB 119280 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Repealing Ordinance 125578 relating to adding a new Chapter 5.37 (Employee Hours Tax) and a new Chapter 5.38 to Title 5 of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125592June 13, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; repealing Ordinance 125578 relating to adding a new Chapter 5.37 (Employee Hours Tax) and a new Chapter 5.38 to Title 5 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $47,400,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedBudget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Provides for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 6, 2018, a….CB 119258 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & EducationGovernment AccountabilityElections Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 6, 2018, a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125604June 27, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationGovernment AccountabilityElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to regular property taxes; providing for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 6, 2018, a proposition to lift the limit on regular property taxes under chapter 84.55 RCW and authorize the City to levy additional taxes for up to seven years for the purpose of providing education services designed to improve access to early learning and high-quality preschool, K-12 school and community-based investments, K-12 school health, and post-secondary and job readiness opportunities for Seattle students; implementing exemptions for low income seniors, disabled veterans, and other people who are disabled as defined in RCW 84.36.381; authorizing a creation of a designated fund; directing the application of levy proceeds; establishing eligibility requirements for partners; establishing accountability and reporting structures; providing for the facilitation of communication between the City and stakeholders; providing for partnership agreements with Seattle School District and Seattle Colleges District; requiring a forthcoming Implementation and Evaluation Plan; proposing a ballot title; and authorizing the implementation of agreements for this levy lid lift which will be commonly known as the Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $636,500,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedDEEL/CBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2019, representing an increase above the regular….CB 119371 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2019, representing an increase above the regular….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125726November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2019, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2018; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $85,900,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes a tax on engaging in the business of distributing sweetened beverages.CB 118965 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes a tax on engaging in the business of distributing sweetened beverages.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125324June 6, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE imposing a tax on engaging in the business of distributing sweetened beverages; adding a new Chapter 5.53 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 5.30.010, 5.30.025.K, 5.30.060.C, 5.55.010, 5.55.040.A, 5.55.060.A, 5.55.150.E, 5.55.165, 5.55.220, and 5.55.230.A.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $23,378,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Imposes an income tax on high-income residents.CB 119002 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitYouth & EducationBudget & Appropriations Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes an income tax on high-income residents.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125339July 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Kshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitYouth & EducationBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE imposing an income tax on high-income residents; providing solutions for lowering the property tax burden and the impact of other regressive taxes, replacing federal funding potentially lost through federal budget cuts, providing public services, including housing, education, and transit, and creating green jobs and meeting carbon reduction goals; and adding a new Chapter 5.65 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $125,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes withdrawals from the Water Fund Revenue Stabilization Subfund.CB 119050 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes withdrawals from the Water Fund Revenue Stabilization Subfund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125444November 17, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to rates and charges for water services of Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing withdrawals from the Water Fund Revenue Stabilization Subfund; revising water rates and charges, and credits to low-income customers; and amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 21.04.430, 21.04.440, and 21.76.040.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,155,641. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Phone:-. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Requiring periodic building energy tune-ups for certain nonresidential buildings.CB 118631 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityBudget & Appropriations Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requiring periodic building energy tune-ups for certain nonresidential buildings.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125002March 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE requiring periodic building energy tune-ups for certain nonresidential buildings; adding a new Chapter 22.930 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 23.58C of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to establish the framework for mandatory housing affordability for residential development.CB 118736 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 23.58C of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to establish the framework for mandatory housing affordability for residential development.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125108August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adding a new Chapter 23.58C of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to establish the framework for mandatory housing affordability for residential development; and amending Section 23.34.004, subsections 23.40.020.A, 23.76.006.B, and 23.76.032.B, Sections 23.90.002 and 23.90.015, and subsection 23.90.018.C of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $196,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2017, representing an increase above the regular….CB 118851 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2017, representing an increase above the regular….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125209November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2017, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2016; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $41,428,571. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 3, 2015, a….CB 118402 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment AccountabilityElections Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 3, 2015, a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124796July 7, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment AccountabilityElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to transportation; providing for the submission to the qualified electors of the City at an election to be held on November 3, 2015, a proposition authorizing the City to levy regular property taxes for up to nine years in excess of the limitation on levies in Chapter 84.55 RCW for the purpose of providing City facilities and services, including transportation improvements, both capital and operating, with possible debt financing; creating a new oversight committee; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $930,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to imposing a tax on engaging in the business of making retail sales of firearms and ammunition.CB 118437 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to imposing a tax on engaging in the business of making retail sales of firearms and ammunition.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124833August 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to imposing a tax on engaging in the business of making retail sales of firearms and ammunition; amending Sections 5.30.010, 5.30.060, 5.55.010, 5.55.040, 5.55.060, 5.55.150, 5.55.165, 5.55.220, and 5.55.230 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 5.50 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $177,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Amending Chapters 22.800, 22.801, 22.802, 22.803, 22.805, 22.807, and 22.808 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adding a new Section 22.800.100.CB 118465 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapters 22.800, 22.801, 22.802, 22.803, 22.805, 22.807, and 22.808 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adding a new Section 22.800.100.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124872September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Stormwater Code; amending Chapters 22.800, 22.801, 22.802, 22.803, 22.805, 22.807, and 22.808 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adding a new Section 22.800.100.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 23.58B of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to establish the framework for an Affordable Housing Impact Mitigation Program….CB 118498 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originAffordable HousingZoningPermitting & Development Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 23.58B of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to establish the framework for an Affordable Housing Impact Mitigation Program….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124895November 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adding a new Chapter 23.58B of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to establish the framework for an Affordable Housing Impact Mitigation Program for commercial development; and amending subsection 23.40.020.A, subsection 23.76.006.B, subsection 23.76.006.C, and subsection 25.05.675.I of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $195,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2016, representing an increase above the regular….CB 118568 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2016, representing an increase above the regular….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124930December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2016, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2015; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $95,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renaming the School Zone Fixed Automated Cameras Fund.CB 118560 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTraffic SafetyZoningYouth & Education Up to 7 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renaming the School Zone Fixed Automated Cameras Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124907December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic SafetyZoningYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to automated fixed camera revenue; renaming the School Zone Fixed Automated Cameras Fund; providing for the deposit of revenues generated by automated traffic safety cameras; and adopting financial policies for The City of Seattle governing the fund; amending Ordinance 124230; and adding a new Chapter 5.82 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,828,736. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value7
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bars Seattle from sharing nonpublic personal information for civil immigration enforcement.CB 121158 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Bars Seattle from sharing nonpublic personal information for civil immigration enforcement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127398February 26, 2026
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to information sharing for enforcement of civil immigration laws; prohibiting City provision of nonpublicly available personal information for use in civil immigration enforcement; clarifying the City’s position on immigration enforcement being a federal matter; making technical corrections; adding a new Section 4.18.016 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Section 4.18.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 4.18.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Prohibits civil immigration enforcement agencies from staging operations on city-owned and controlled property.CB 121164 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originCity Property Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Prohibits civil immigration enforcement agencies from staging operations on city-owned and controlled property.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127406March 23, 2026
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to civil immigration enforcement; prohibiting civil immigration enforcement staging on all real property that is City owned and controlled; and adding a new Chapter 14.125 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCouncil. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts permanent floodplain rules and updated maps so residents can remain eligible for federal flood insurance.CB 121152 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts permanent floodplain rules and updated maps so residents can remain eligible for federal flood insurance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127410March 31, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsEddie Lin
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; adopting permanent regulations consistent with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulations; adopting the February 2020 updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to allow individuals to continue to obtain flood insurance through FEMA’s Flood Insurance Program; repealing Ordinances 126113 and 126536; and amending Chapter 25.06 and Section 25.09.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts outside grants, loans, and private funding and adds them to Seattle's 2026 budget.CB 121187 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts outside grants, loans, and private funding and adds them to Seattle's 2026 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127420April 21, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 127362, which adopted the 2026 Budget, including the 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2026-2031 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $32,457,051. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves Seattle's World Cup agreement, accepts event grants, and adds funding to the city budget.CB 121201 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves Seattle's World Cup agreement, accepts event grants, and adds funding to the city budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127431May 14, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the 2026 Federation Internationale de Football Association World Cup; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to execute an agreement between SeattleFWC26 and The City of Seattle; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 127362, which adopted the 2026 Budget, including the 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,076,982. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates permanent citywide rules for designating, operating, and using shared streets.CB 121176 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates permanent citywide rules for designating, operating, and using shared streets.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127432May 22, 2026
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to shared streets; adding a new Chapter 11.45 to the Seattle Municipal Code; adding new Sections 11.14.562 and 11.52.125 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Sections 11.40.090, 11.40.100, 11.40.120, 11.40.160, 11.40.220, 11.40.240, 11.44.040, 11.44.060, and 11.53.205 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending the title of Title 11, Subtitle I, Part 4 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Changes department appropriations and budget-control levels in Seattle's adopted 2025 budget.CB 121208 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changes department appropriations and budget-control levels in Seattle's adopted 2025 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127456June 26, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $31,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Changes department appropriations and budget-control levels in Seattle's adopted 2026 budget.CB 121209 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changes department appropriations and budget-control levels in Seattle's adopted 2026 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127457June 26, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance amending Ordinance 127362, which adopted the 2026 Budget, including the 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $138,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a collective-bargaining agreement between City Light and electrical workers represented by IBEW Local 77.CB 121257 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originElectricityCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a collective-bargaining agreement between City Light and electrical workers represented by IBEW Local 77.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127479July 31, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle City Light and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 77; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $654,452,098. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a do-not-solicit list protecting homeowners from unwanted residential-property offers.CB 121259 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates a do-not-solicit list protecting homeowners from unwanted residential-property offers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127491August 12, 2026
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to unfair housing practices; adding new protections for homeowners from unwanted solicitation of residential property by establishing a Do Not Solicit List; providing an enforcement process; prescribing penalties; amending Section 14.08.020 and 14.08.190 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Section 14.08.042 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding reporting requirements.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $369,500. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts outside grants, loans, and private funding and adds them to Seattle's 2026 budget.CB 121252 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts outside grants, loans, and private funding and adds them to Seattle's 2026 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127495August 14, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 127362, which adopted the 2026 Budget, including the 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2026-2031 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $44,922,630. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates City Light's voluntary green-power and community-solar programs.CB 121261 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates City Light's voluntary green-power and community-solar programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127493August 14, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the City Light Department; amending Sections 21.49.084 and 21.49.087 of the Seattle Municipal Code to update the Voluntary Green Power Programs and Community Solar Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,253,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a collective bargaining agreement between Seattle and the Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild.CB 121294 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a collective bargaining agreement between Seattle and the Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127512September 24, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,484,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expands and extends property-tax exemptions for converting commercial buildings into housing.CB 120943 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expands and extends property-tax exemptions for converting commercial buildings into housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127187March 6, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsCathy Moore
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program; allowing partial property tax exemptions for commercial to multifamily housing conversion projects; allowing the property tax exemption period to be extended to 24 years for properties with Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption expiring end of 2025; changing the MFTE Program’s sunset date to September 10, 2025; and amending Sections 5.73.010, 5.73.020, 5.73.040, 5.73.050, 5.73.070, 5.73.090, and 5.73.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $330,300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Allows certain Seattle construction projects and building permits more time to proceed.CB 120948 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allows certain Seattle construction projects and building permits more time to proceed.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127205April 23, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s construction codes; allowing for the extension of certain projects and building permits; amending Sections 106.6.10, 106.9, and 106.10 of the Seattle Building Code, adopted by Ordinance 127108.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $75,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates eligibility and rates for City Light’s dedicated renewable-energy program.CB 120952 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates eligibility and rates for City Light’s dedicated renewable-energy program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127207May 2, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Department to establish eligibility requirements for customers participating in the Renewable Plus Program and charging a rate for the delivery of dedicated renewable energy and its associated Renewable Energy Credits supplied by the Department under the Renewable Plus Program; and amending Section 21.49.089 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $80,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts outside grants, loans, and private funding and adds them to Seattle’s 2025 budget.CB 120970 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts outside grants, loans, and private funding and adds them to Seattle’s 2025 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127216May 16, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2025-2030 CIP; creating positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $29,100,889. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes agreements to jointly redevelop and operate Memorial Stadium.CB 120982 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentYouth & EducationBudget & Appropriations Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes agreements to jointly redevelop and operate Memorial Stadium.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127222June 6, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentYouth & EducationBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the redevelopment and operation of Seattle Public Schools Memorial Stadium at Seattle Center; authorizing the Mayor to execute an interlocal agreement with Seattle School District No. 1 (SPS) for the joint redevelopment of Memorial Stadium and associated improvements benefiting the Seattle Center campus; authorizing the Mayor to execute a development agreement with Memorial Stadium Redevelopment LLC (MSR) providing for joint funding and design and construction of a new Memorial Stadium; authorizing the Seattle Center Director and City Budget Director to negotiate for the Mayor’s signature a five-year operating and maintenance agreement with MSR and SPS; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $69,300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a collective-bargaining agreement with machinists employed by the City.CB 121001 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a collective-bargaining agreement with machinists employed by the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127233June 23, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 160, Local 79; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,123,574. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sends a six-year education-support property-tax levy to Seattle voters.CB 120981 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & EducationGovernment AccountabilityElections Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sends a six-year education-support property-tax levy to Seattle voters.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127238June 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationGovernment AccountabilityElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to regular property taxes; requesting that a special election be held concurrent with the November 4, 2025 general election for submission to the qualified electors of the City, a proposition to lift the limit on regular property taxes under chapter 84.55 RCW and to authorize the City to levy additional taxes for up to six years for the purpose of providing education support services designed to improve access to early learning, including childcare and preschool; academic, health, and safety supports for K-12 students; and college and career pathways for Seattle students; applying the exemption for low income seniors, disabled veterans, and others authorized by RCW 84.36.381; authorizing a creation of a designated fund; directing the application of levy proceeds; establishing eligibility requirements for partners; establishing accountability and reporting structures; requiring a forthcoming Implementation and Evaluation Plan; proposing a ballot title; authorizing the implementation of agreements for this levy lid lift which will be commonly known as the Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,326,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedDEEL/CBO. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts outside funding and revises 2025 budget and capital-project appropriations.CB 121030 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts outside funding and revises 2025 budget and capital-project appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127263August 7, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2025-2030 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $17,570,338. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Revises 2025 appropriations, capital projects, positions, and budget controls.CB 121031 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises 2025 appropriations, capital projects, positions, and budget controls.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127264August 7, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2025-2030 CIP; adding CIP Projects; creating positions; modifying positions; abrogating positions; lifting a proviso; creating a new budget control level; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $217,412,801. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 disqualified
Revises 2025 appropriations and removes an existing budget restriction.CB 121029 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises 2025 appropriations and removes an existing budget restriction.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127270August 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $169,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises appropriations across departments and funds in Seattle’s 2025 budget.CB 121042 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises appropriations across departments and funds in Seattle’s 2025 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127269August 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $314,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves revised long-term wholesale-water contracts and related stabilization-fund authority.CB 121050 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves revised long-term wholesale-water contracts and related stabilization-fund authority.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127311September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to execute the First Amended and Restated Contract between The City of Seattle and its long-term, full and partial requirements contract holders for the supply of water; authorizing the withdrawal of funds from the Water Fund Revenue Stabilization Subfund; providing budget authority to use such funds to provide payments to Water Utilities as required under the proposed contracts; amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; imposing a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $54,100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Funds staffing and oversight needed for Sound Transit 3 permit review.CB 121068 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originTransitPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Funds staffing and oversight needed for Sound Transit 3 permit review.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127304September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget to support the City’s efforts to expeditiously deliver the Sound Transit 3 program permit review and other oversight; creating exempt and nonexempt positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,948,715. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOffice of the Waterfront, Civic Projects, and Sound Transit. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises solid-waste rates, low-income credits, and service categories.CB 121051 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid Waste Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises solid-waste rates, low-income credits, and service categories.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127322October 16, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Solid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the solid waste system of Seattle Public Utilities; revising rates and charges for solid waste services; revising credits to low-income customers for solid waste services; adding solid waste service categories; and amending Sections 21.36.010, 21.36.012, 21.36.016, 21.40.050, 21.40.060, 21.40.070, 21.40.080, 21.40.085, and 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,273,508. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Approves a 2023–2028 labor agreement with City transportation electrical workers.CB 121088 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a 2023–2028 labor agreement with City transportation electrical workers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127330October 29, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77 (Seattle Department of Transportation), effective from January 23, 2023, through January 22, 2028; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $31,005,556. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts outside funding and revises 2025 budget and capital-project appropriations.CB 121099 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts outside funding and revises 2025 budget and capital-project appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127340November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2025-2030 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $93,360,182. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Revises 2025 appropriations, capital projects, and authorized City positions.CB 121113 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises 2025 appropriations, capital projects, and authorized City positions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127350November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2025-2030 CIP; adding CIP Projects; creating positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $102,614,552. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Updates construction-permit fees charged by SDCI and related departments.CB 121105 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates construction-permit fees charged by SDCI and related departments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127360November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and technical corrections; adding a new Section 22.900G.025 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 22.900B.010, 22.900C.010, 22.900D.010, 22.900D.150, 22.900G.010, 22.900H.020, 22.900H.030, 22.900H.050, 22.900H.060, 22.900H.070, and 22.900H.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,766,491. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Updates Seattle business-tax definitions to match state model-ordinance changes.CB 121118 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle business-tax definitions to match state model-ordinance changes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127353November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the business and occupation tax; amending Section 5.30.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code to amend definitions due to amendments to the model business license tax ordinance and other state law amendments.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,800,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOCF. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Revises South Lake Union and downtown infrastructure funding and appropriates park funds for related costs.CB 121137 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatBudget & Appropriations Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises South Lake Union and downtown infrastructure funding and appropriates park funds for related costs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127377December 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending the Amended Landscape Conservation and Infrastructure Program Funding Plan for the South Lake Union and Downtown as adopted by Ordinance 127252; amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; making an appropriation from the Park and Recreation Fund for related costs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves 2023–2026 labor agreements with the Coalition of City Unions.CB 120757 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves 2023–2026 labor agreements with the Coalition of City Unions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127005April 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and certain City unions in the Coalition of City Unions for the period from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2026; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $692,912,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources / Legislative. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Raises pay for specified nonrepresented City employees and updates related code sections.CB 120758 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Raises pay for specified nonrepresented City employees and updates related code sections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127006April 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; providing wage increases effective January 4, 2023, and January 3, 2024, for certain non-represented City employees and officers; providing adjustments to certain pay titles in addition to the 2023 and 2024 wage increases; amending Sections 4.04.030, 4.20.325, 4.28.010, 4.28.020, and 4.34.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $692,912,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources / Legislative. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemptions scheduled to expire in 2024.CB 120772 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemptions scheduled to expire in 2024.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127016May 8, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsCathy Moore
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program; amending Section 5.73.090 and Section 5.73.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow extension of tax exemptions scheduled to expire on December 31, 2024.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $439,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a 2021–2023 Seattle Police Officers Guild labor agreement and related memorandum.CB 120783 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a 2021–2023 Seattle Police Officers Guild labor agreement and related memorandum.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127019May 14, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson, Robert Kettle
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild for the period from January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2023; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $172,105,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Approves a 2023–2026 labor agreement with AFSCME Local 21SP.CB 120784 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a 2023–2026 labor agreement with AFSCME Local 21SP.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127023May 16, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Washington State Council of County and City Employees, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Local 21SP, for the period from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2026; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $26,421,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts 2023 budget appropriations and lifts a budget restriction.CB 120773 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts 2023 budget appropriations and lifts a budget restriction.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127030May 30, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; lifting a budget proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,764,167. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts 2024 operating and capital budget appropriations across departments.CB 120774 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts 2024 operating and capital budget appropriations across departments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127036June 6, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget, including the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $201,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a labor agreement with IBEW Local 77 information-technology professionals.CB 120796 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a labor agreement with IBEW Local 77 information-technology professionals.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127043June 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 77 Information Technology Professionals’ Unit; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $83,431,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves collective bargaining agreements with IBEW Local 77 units.CB 120801 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves collective bargaining agreements with IBEW Local 77 units.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127047June 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $77,943,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts 2024 operating and capital budget appropriations across departments.CB 120811 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts 2024 operating and capital budget appropriations across departments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127067August 16, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget, including the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $225,364,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Rebalances the 2024 budget, revises capital projects, and changes positions and restrictions.CB 120812 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Rebalances the 2024 budget, revises capital projects, and changes positions and restrictions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127068August 16, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget, including the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2024-2029 CIP; adding CIP Projects; imposing a proviso; creating positions; modifying positions; abrogating positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $170,178,250. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Accepts outside funding and adjusts 2024 operating and capital appropriations.CB 120813 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts outside funding and adjusts 2024 operating and capital appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127069August 16, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget, including the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2024-2029 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $47,230,007. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts customer rates for Seattle Public Utilities drainage services.CB 120819 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts customer rates for Seattle Public Utilities drainage services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127072September 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to drainage services of Seattle Public Utilities; adjusting drainage rates; and amending Sections 21.33.010, 21.33.030, 21.33.040, 21.33.050, and 21.33.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect adjusted rates.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,965,129. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts customer rates for Seattle Public Utilities wastewater services.CB 120820 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts customer rates for Seattle Public Utilities wastewater services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127073September 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to wastewater services of Seattle Public Utilities; adjusting wastewater rates; and amending Section 21.28.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect adjusted rates.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,045,229. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts 2024 appropriations and places restrictions on specified spending.CB 120893 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts 2024 appropriations and places restrictions on specified spending.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127154November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget, imposing provisos; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $27,250,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOffice for Civil Rights. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts City Light electricity rates and terms for 2024–2026.CB 120856 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts City Light electricity rates and terms for 2024–2026.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127122November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2024, 2025, and 2026; and amending Sections 21.49.020, 21.49.030, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.058, 21.49.060, 21.49.065, 21.49.083, 21.49.085, and 21.49.086 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $125,025,022. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts outside funding and adjusts 2024 operating and capital appropriations.CB 120902 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts outside funding and adjusts 2024 operating and capital appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127149November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget, including the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2024-2029 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $74,414,479. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Rebalances the 2024 budget, revises capital projects, and changes positions and restrictions.CB 120903 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Rebalances the 2024 budget, revises capital projects, and changes positions and restrictions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127150November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget, including the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2024-2029 CIP; creating positions; adding provisos; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $170,984,577. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts 2024 operating and capital budget appropriations across departments.CB 120872 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts 2024 operating and capital budget appropriations across departments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127123November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget, including the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $227,039,953. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates construction and inspection permit fees and makes technical corrections.CB 120883 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates construction and inspection permit fees and makes technical corrections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127134November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and technical corrections; repealing Chapter 22.504 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 22.504.010, 22.900B.010, 22.900B.020, 22.900C.010, 22.900D.010, 22.900D.090, 22.900D.100, 22.900D.110, 22.900D.140, 22.900D.150, 22.900D.160, 22.900E.020, 22.900E.030, 22.900E.040, 22.900E.050, 22.900.G.010, and 22.900G.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $8,885,239. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to….CB 120527 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126791March 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2023-2028 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $23,104,553. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Establishes a new ten-year Business Improvement Area to be known as the Metropolitan Improvement District.CB 120537 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a new ten-year Business Improvement Area to be known as the Metropolitan Improvement District.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126817May 18, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to downtown business improvement areas; establishing a new ten-year Business Improvement Area to be known as the Metropolitan Improvement District; levying special assessments upon owners of commercial property, multifamily residential property, and mixed-use property within the area; providing for the deposit of revenues in a special account and expenditures therefrom; providing for collection of and penalties for delinquencies; providing for the establishment of a Ratepayers Advisory Board; providing for an implementation agreement with a Program Manager; disestablishing the existing Metropolitan Improvement District that was established by Ordinance 124175 (“2013 MID”); suspending the issuance of assessments and providing for the continuity of services under the 2013 MID; providing for the transfer of any remaining funds from the 2013 MID Account; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the transfer of certain funds in the Light Fund into the Rate Stabilization Account in 2023.CB 120556 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the transfer of certain funds in the Light Fund into the Rate Stabilization Account in 2023.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126819May 19, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the transfer of certain funds in the Light Fund into the Rate Stabilization Account in 2023; and superseding certain provisions of subsection 21.49.086.E of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $140,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120573 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126827June 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $154,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates industrial zones to implement the Industrial and Maritime Strategy.CB 120567 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates industrial zones to implement the Industrial and Maritime Strategy.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126862July 25, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; updating industrial zones to implement the Industrial and Maritime Strategy; amending Sections 23.30.010, 23.41.004, 23.47A.009, 23.53.006, 23.53.010, 23.53.020, 23.54.015, 23.74.002, 23.74.006, 23.74.008, 23.74.009, 23.74.010, 23.84A.018, and 23.84A.040 of, and adding new Sections 23.34.097, 23.34.098, and 23.34.099 and a new Chapter 23.50A to, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 52, 53, 54, 55, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78….CB 120569 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 52, 53, 54, 55, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126863July 25, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 52, 53, 54, 55, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 85, 86, 87, 89, 90, 91, 97, 98, 99, 102, 115, 116, 117, 118, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 189, 190, 214 and 215 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the Seattle’s Industrial areas.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Removing certain existing provisions for the Industrial Commercial zone.CB 120570 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Removing certain existing provisions for the Industrial Commercial zone.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126864July 25, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; removing certain existing provisions for the Industrial Commercial zone; and amending Sections 23.42.126, 23.49.014, 23.50.002, 23.50.012, 23.50.014, 23.50.020, 23.50.027, 23.50.028, 23.50.034, 23.50.046, 23.69.022, and 23.74.010, and repealing Sections 23.50.026, 23.50.032, 23.50.033, 23.50.038, 23.50.039, 23.50.041, 23.50.053, and 23.50.055, of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to….CB 120617 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126875August 11, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2023-2028 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,385,420. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120618 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126876August 11, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2023-2028 CIP; creating CIP Projects; creating positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $196,838,333. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes labor standards on deactivation protections for app-based workers working in Seattle.CB 120580 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes labor standards on deactivation protections for app-based workers working in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126878August 14, 2023
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to app-based worker labor standards; establishing labor standards on deactivation protections for app-based workers working in Seattle; amending Section 3.02.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 8.40 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the….CB 120655 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126898September 25, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry Local 32; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,142,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDHR. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120669 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126922October 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding from non-City sources; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2023-2028 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $80,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to….CB 120700 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126931November 29, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2023-2028 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,809,796. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120705 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126932November 29, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2023-2028 CIP; creating CIP Projects; creating positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $284,767,639. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Increasing the tax rates of the payroll expense tax imposed on persons engaging in business in Seattle.CB 119950 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Increasing the tax rates of the payroll expense tax imposed on persons engaging in business in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126933December 1, 2023
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; increasing the tax rates of the payroll expense tax imposed on persons engaging in business in Seattle; and amending Section 5.38.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $187,200,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 22.900I to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120680 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 22.900I to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126935December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and technical corrections; adding a new Chapter 22.900I to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 22.210.060, 22.900A.010, 22.900A.020, 22.900A.065, 22.900B.010, 22.900B.020, 22.900C.010, 22.900D.010, 22.900D.110, 22.900D.140, 22.900D.160, 22.900E.020, 22.900E.030, 22.900E.050, 22.900F.010, 22.900H.020, 22.900H.050, 22.900H.060, and 22.900H.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,790,412. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Defining the sourcing of gross income arising from the activities of printing, and publishing newspapers, periodicals, or magazines.CB 120702 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Defining the sourcing of gross income arising from the activities of printing, and publishing newspapers, periodicals, or magazines.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126950December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; defining the sourcing of gross income arising from the activities of printing, and publishing newspapers, periodicals, or magazines; and modifying, effective January 1, 2024, the definition of printing, and publishing newspapers, periodicals, or magazines in accordance with ESS2B 5199 (2023); and amending Section 5.45.081 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $368,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Finance. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes license and fee requirements on network companies.CB 120706 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Imposes license and fee requirements on network companies.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126953December 1, 2023
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the regulation of network companies; imposing license and fee requirements on network companies; adding a new Chapter 6.700 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 3.15.007 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,100,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Requiring that such appropriated money be used only for wage increases for human services workers that are in addition to inflationary adjustments.CB 120717 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originCompensation & BenefitsHuman Services & Food Security Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring that such appropriated money be used only for wage increases for human services workers that are in addition to inflationary adjustments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126963December 18, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & BenefitsHuman Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to human services contracts that include appropriated money expressly reserved for the purpose of human services provider pay; requiring that such appropriated money be used only for wage increases for human services workers that are in addition to inflationary adjustments; establishing contracting and reporting requirements regarding use of such appropriated money; and adding a new Chapter 20.61 and Section 20.61.010 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,100,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 27 AFL-CIO-CLC.CB 120730 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 27 AFL-CIO-CLC.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126974December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 27 AFL-CIO-CLC; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $106,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120317 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126587May 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,316,307. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120316 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126586May 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $127,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.CB 120324 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126582May 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the 2022 Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $17,360,707. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Management Association to be effective….CB 120332 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Management Association to be effective….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126597June 14, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Management Association to be effective January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $21,140,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120366 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126641August 4, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2022-2027 CIP; creating positions; modifying positions; abrogating positions; modifying or adding provisos; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $218,199,789. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Section 11.72.445 to the Seattle Municipal Code to establish the authority to designate parking for truck tractors in the….CB 120364 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Section 11.72.445 to the Seattle Municipal Code to establish the authority to designate parking for truck tractors in the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126647August 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Traffic Code; adding a new Section 11.72.445 to the Seattle Municipal Code to establish the authority to designate parking for truck tractors in the public right of way; and amending Section 11.31.121 to allow for enforcement of truck tractor parking.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2022, 2023, and….CB 120411 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2022, 2023, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126677September 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2022, 2023, and 2024; amending Sections 21.49.020, 21.49.030, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.058, 21.49.060, 21.49.065, 21.49.083, 21.49.085, and 21.49.086 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $44,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Revising rates and charges for solid waste services.CB 120410 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid Waste Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising rates and charges for solid waste services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126689October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Solid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the solid waste system of Seattle Public Utilities; revising rates and charges for solid waste services; revising credits to low-income customers for solid waste services; and amending Sections 21.40.050, 21.40.060, 21.40.070, 21.40.080, 21.40.085, and 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,618,310. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120451 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126706December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2022-2027 CIP; creating positions; modifying positions; abrogating positions; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $116,348,795. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2023, representing an increase above the regular….CB 120446 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2023, representing an increase above the regular….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126724December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2023, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2022; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,336,861. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Repealing Ordinance 125934 relating to imposing a tax on heating oil service providers and adding a new Chapter 5.47 to the Seattle….CB 120453 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Repealing Ordinance 125934 relating to imposing a tax on heating oil service providers and adding a new Chapter 5.47 to the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126721December 2, 2022
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to heating oil; repealing Ordinance 125934 relating to imposing a tax on heating oil service providers and adding a new Chapter 5.47 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,500,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides temporary flexibility on use of certain City funds to balance the City’s budget over the 2023-2024 biennium.CB 120463 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Provides temporary flexibility on use of certain City funds to balance the City’s budget over the 2023-2024 biennium.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126719December 2, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to adoption of the 2023 Budget and endorsement of the 2024 Proposed Budget; providing temporary flexibility on use of certain City funds to balance the City’s budget over the 2023-2024 biennium; amending Section 5.38.055 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Resolution 31914; amending Ordinance 125872; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $100,600,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120019 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126298March 25, 2021
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and adding or modifying provisos; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2021 and 2022.CB 120015 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2021 and 2022.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126302April 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2021 and 2022; amending Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.058, and 21.49.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $955,600,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120018 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126307April 16, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; authorizing the Mayor or Mayor’s designees to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; changing appropriations to various departments; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,722,605. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOH. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and PROTEC17 Strategic Advisor-Legislative Bargaining Unit to be effective….CB 120034 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and PROTEC17 Strategic Advisor-Legislative Bargaining Unit to be effective….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126316April 23, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and PROTEC17 Strategic Advisor-Legislative Bargaining Unit to be effective January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,106,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120041 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126320April 30, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2021 Budget; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments; creating positions exempt from civil service; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $131,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120039 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126326May 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $84,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapters 22.800, 22.801, 22.803, 22.805, and 22.807 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120044 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapters 22.800, 22.801, 22.803, 22.805, and 22.807 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126336May 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Stormwater Code Update; amending Chapters 22.800, 22.801, 22.803, 22.805, and 22.807 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPU. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120087 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originBudget & AppropriationsCivil Rights Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126360June 7, 2021
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsCivil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Seattle Office for Civil Rights; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; lifting a proviso; imposing provisos; creating new positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement district bonds (LID Bonds, as defined herein) to provide funds to….CB 120073 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement district bonds (LID Bonds, as defined herein) to provide funds to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126364June 18, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to financing public improvements within Local Improvement District No. 6751 (also known as the Waterfront LID); authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement district bonds (LID Bonds, as defined herein) to provide funds to pay or reimburse a portion of the costs of the LID Improvements (as defined), to make a deposit to the Local Improvement Guaranty Fund, and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; pledging the LID assessments collected in the Waterfront LID and the amounts available in the Local Improvement Guaranty Fund to pay and secure the LID Bonds; providing parameters for Bond Sale Terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; providing for and fixing the installment payment terms and interest rate on assessments in the Waterfront LID; amending Section 20.08.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code to conform to changes in state law; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis.CB 120093 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126371June 22, 2021
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis; creating a new Fund in the City Treasury; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); accepting funding from non-City sources; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the 2021 Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2021-2026 CIP; modifying or adding provisos; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $128,391,498. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis.CB 120094 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126372June 22, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; imposing provisos; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts, all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $25,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLEG / CBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates and changing the names of funds in the City Treasury.CB 120117 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates and changing the names of funds in the City Treasury.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126387July 16, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City Finances; creating and changing the names of funds in the City Treasury; amending Ordinance 126161, which authorized an interfund loan; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120131 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126401August 11, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; lifting provisos; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $30,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis.CB 120150 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126406August 12, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); accepting funding from non-City sources; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the 2021 Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2021-2026 CIP; imposing provisos; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $52,150,738. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120112 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126429September 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2021-2026 CIP; creating positions; modifying positions; abrogating positions; modifying or adding provisos; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $40,967,354. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Adjusts drainage rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County and meet capital financing requirements.CB 120128 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts drainage rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County and meet capital financing requirements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126432September 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to drainage services of Seattle Public Utilities; adjusting drainage rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County and meet capital financing requirements; amending Section 21.33.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect adjusted rates; and amending Section 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust credits to low-income customers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $11,379,774. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Adjusts wastewater rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County.CB 120129 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts wastewater rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126433September 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to wastewater services of Seattle Public Utilities; adjusting wastewater rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County; amending Section 21.28.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect adjusted rates; and amending Section 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust credits to low-income customers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $24,400,377. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120178 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126449October 4, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and lifting a proviso; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $300,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring the payment of economic displacement relocation assistance to households that are vacating a housing unit after receiving notice of a rent….CB 120173 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring the payment of economic displacement relocation assistance to households that are vacating a housing unit after receiving notice of a rent….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126451October 8, 2021
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to relocation assistance for economically displaced tenants; requiring the payment of economic displacement relocation assistance to households that are vacating a housing unit after receiving notice of a rent increase of ten percent or more or of less than ten percent where the cumulative effect for the household’s tenancy is ten percent or more; and adding a new Chapter 22.212 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,300,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120040 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126471December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $23,498,162. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120221 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126470December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2021-2026 CIP; creating positions; modifying positions; abrogating positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $195,243,409. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2022, representing an increase above the regular….CB 120204 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2022, representing an increase above the regular….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126492December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2022, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2021; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,185,720. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Directing the transfer of certain funds in the Light Fund into the Rate Stabilization Account in 2021.CB 120233 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Directing the transfer of certain funds in the Light Fund into the Rate Stabilization Account in 2021.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126502December 10, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; directing the transfer of certain funds in the Light Fund into the Rate Stabilization Account in 2021; and amending Section 21.49.086 of the Seattle Municipal Code to simplify the operation of the Rate Stabilization Account.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $125,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily extending increased assistance related to COVID-induced customer delinquencies.CB 120226 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily extending increased assistance related to COVID-induced customer delinquencies.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126494December 10, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities’ Emergency Assistance Program; temporarily extending increased assistance related to COVID-induced customer delinquencies; and amending Section 21.76.065 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and PROTEC17 Office of Emergency Management unit to be….CB 120232 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originEmergency ManagementCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and PROTEC17 Office of Emergency Management unit to be….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126495December 10, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Emergency ManagementCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and PROTEC17 Office of Emergency Management unit to be effective through December 31, 2021; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,106,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to City finances.CB 119763 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to City finances.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126062April 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to City finances; creating a fund for depositing donations, gifts, and grants related to The City of Seattle’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic; creating a Budget Summary Level; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $30,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.CB 119783 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126074May 6, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; accepting funding from non-City sources; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date, all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,026,978. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.CB 119791 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126084May 26, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date, all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,026,978. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild.CB 119794 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126087June 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,106,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.CB 119816 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126106July 10, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; accepting funding from non-City sources; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,498,120. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119820 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126126August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $42,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119821 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126127August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,186,558. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.CB 119824 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126130August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; accepting funding from non-City sources; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $131,510,477. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119818 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126124August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new CIP projects and revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2020-2025 CIP; abrogating positions; modifying positions, and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $37,932,171. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District….CB 119878 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126166September 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 160, Local 79; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,106,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.CB 119825 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126148September 22, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City’s response to the 2020 COVID-19 crisis; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; imposing a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $27,533,325. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Amending subsection 21.49.086.D of the Seattle Municipal Code to define the Net Wholesale Revenue target used in Rate Stabilization Account operations for….CB 119898 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending subsection 21.49.086.D of the Seattle Municipal Code to define the Net Wholesale Revenue target used in Rate Stabilization Account operations for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126194October 8, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending subsection 21.49.086.D of the Seattle Municipal Code to define the Net Wholesale Revenue target used in Rate Stabilization Account operations for 2021-2024.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts wastewater rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County.CB 119916 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts wastewater rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126216December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to wastewater services of Seattle Public Utilities; adjusting wastewater rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County; amending Sections 21.28.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect the adjusted rates; and amending Section 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust credits to low-income wastewater customers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,562,205. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2021, representing an increase above the regular….CB 119940 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2021, representing an increase above the regular….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126239December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2021, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2020; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,015,567. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the transportation network company tax threshold for number of trips under Section 5.39.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119932 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the transportation network company tax threshold for number of trips under Section 5.39.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126231December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; amending the transportation network company tax threshold for number of trips under Section 5.39.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $11,491,112. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119910 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126210December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new CIP projects and revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2020-2025 CIP; creating positions; modifying positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,876,407. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Identifying philanthropic funding for construction and operations and maintenance and safety and security of public spaces on the Central Waterfront.CB 119448 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Identifying philanthropic funding for construction and operations and maintenance and safety and security of public spaces on the Central Waterfront.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125761January 29, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the funding, operations, and management for Central Waterfront improvements; identifying philanthropic funding for construction and operations and maintenance and safety and security of public spaces on the Central Waterfront; identifying a timeline for philanthropic fundraising and contributions; authorizing the Seattle Department of Transportation and the Department of Parks and Recreation to execute a two-year pilot agreement in preparation for a long-term agreement with Friends of Waterfront Seattle to operate and manage public spaces on the Central Waterfront; dissolving the Central Waterfront Steering Committee; and creating the Central Waterfront Oversight Committee.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $110,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 28 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the….CB 119445 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 28 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125792March 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 28 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the Northgate Urban Center; amending Sections 23.30.010, 23.48.002, 23.48.040, 23.48.055, 23.48.085, 23.58B.040, 23.58B.050, 23.58C.040, 23.58C.050, 23.71.004, 23.84A.025, 23.84A.038, 23.84A.048, and 25.05.800 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Subchapter VII to Chapter 23.48 of the Seattle Municipal Code, consisting of Sections 23.48.802, 23.48.805, 23.48.820, 23.48.825, 23.48.827, 23.48.835, 23.48.840, 23.48.841, 23.48.845, 23.48.846, 23.48.847, 23.48.850, 23.48.852, 23.48.880, and 23.48.885.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning & Community Development (OPCD). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Rezoning certain land and modifying development standards throughout the City, implementing MHA requirements, and modifying existing development standards to improve livability.CB 119444 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Rezoning certain land and modifying development standards throughout the City, implementing MHA requirements, and modifying existing development standards to improve livability.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125791March 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA); rezoning certain land and modifying development standards throughout the City, implementing MHA requirements, and modifying existing development standards to improve livability; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) at pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 80, 81, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 170, 172, 173, 174, 175, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 195, 197, 198, 200, 203, 205, 206, 208, 215, 216, 217, 218, and 219 of the Official Land Use Map; amending Chapters 23.30, 23.34, 23.44, 23.45, 23.47A, 23.48, 23.50, 23.53, 23.54, 23.58A, 23.58B, 23.58C, 23.58D, 23.71, 23.73, 23.74, 23.76, 23.84A, 23.86, 23.91, 25.05, and 25.11 of the SMC; adding Sections 23.34.006, 23.44.009, 23.44.011, 23.44.017, 23.44.018, 23.44.019, 23.44.020, 23.45.530, 23.48.050, 23.48.340, 23.48.345, 23.48.445, 23.48.900, 23.48.905, 23.48.920, 23.48.940, and 23.48.945 to the SMC; repealing Sections 23.34.026, 23.43.006, 23.43.008, 23.43.010, 23.43.012, 23.43.040, 23.48.425, 23.48.621, 23.48.721, 23.58A.025, 23.58A.026, 23.58A.028, and 23.71.040 of the SMC; recodifying Section 23.44.018 of the SMC as Section 23.44.021; and amending the titles of Chapter 23.45 and Subchapter IV of Chapter 23.58A of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $380,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119478 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125795March 22, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2019-2024 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $33,776,222. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides that the Seattle Human Services Department provide a cost increase when renewing or renegotiating contracts to address escalation in costs and….CB 119542 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originHuman Services & Food Security Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Provides that the Seattle Human Services Department provide a cost increase when renewing or renegotiating contracts to address escalation in costs and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125865July 26, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting by the Human Services Department; providing that the Seattle Human Services Department provide a cost increase when renewing or renegotiating contracts to address escalation in costs and specifying how and when to apply the increase; amending Section 20.60.102 of the Seattle Municipal Code to exempt human services contracts from the provisions of Chapter 20.60; and adding a new Section 3.20.060 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $45,154,485. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Stating an intent to adopt legislation imposing a local sales and use tax at the maximum rate authorized to fund investments in….Res 31893 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Stating an intent to adopt legislation imposing a local sales and use tax at the maximum rate authorized to fund investments in….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 14, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to taxation; stating an intent to adopt legislation imposing a local sales and use tax at the maximum rate authorized to fund investments in affordable and supportive housing.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119572 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125893August 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,619,032. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119573 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125897August 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $90,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119575 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125895August 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2019-2024 CIP; creating both exempt and non-exempt positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $65,178,761. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119576 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125896August 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $32,411,169. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77….CB 119623 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125917September 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Sally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77 Information Technology Professionals Unit; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $74,700,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 5.73 of the Seattle Municipal Code to renew and modify the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption program.CB 119615 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 5.73 of the Seattle Municipal Code to renew and modify the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125932September 25, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program; amending Chapter 5.73 of the Seattle Municipal Code to renew and modify the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,580,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Imposes a tax on heating oil service providers.CB 119607 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes a tax on heating oil service providers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125934October 1, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to heating oil; imposing a tax on heating oil service providers; directing the expenditure of heating oil tax revenues; directing relevant City departments to create a plan for regulating the use of heating oil tanks; adding a new Chapter 5.47 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 5.30.010, 5.30.060, 5.55.010, 5.55.040, 5.55.060, 5.55.150, 5.55.165, 5.55.220, 5.55.230, and 6.208.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,593,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOSE. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Revising rates and charges for solid waste services.CB 119672 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid Waste Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising rates and charges for solid waste services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125985December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the solid waste system of Seattle Public Utilities; revising rates and charges for solid waste services; revising credits to low income customers for solid waste services; and amending Sections 21.40.050, 21.40.060, 21.40.070, 21.40.080, 21.40.085, and 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $25,200,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119668 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125981December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2019-2024 CIP; creating non-exempt positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $164,488,263. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Repealing business license standards for periods prior to 2008.CB 119682 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Repealing business license standards for periods prior to 2008.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125996December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the business license tax; repealing business license standards for periods prior to 2008; amending apportionment provisions to reflect amendments to the model business license tax ordinance and other state amendments; amending Sections 5.45.081, 5.45.082, and 5.45.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 5.45.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $297,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the….CB 119703 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125979December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry Local 32; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,106,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and certain City unions.CB 119719 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and certain City unions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126020December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and certain City unions; authorizing execution of a memorandum of agreement between The City of Seattle and The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District Lodge 160, Local 289; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,106,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget.CB 119722 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126012December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $67,550,800. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget.CB 119196 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125534February 23, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget, including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119274 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget, including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125618July 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget, including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119272 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125616July 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2018-2023 CIP; creating both exempt and non-exempt positions; modifying positions; making cash transfers between various City funds; amending a Budget Summary Level purpose statement; revising project descriptions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $16,989,657. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to KeyArena.CB 119345 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to KeyArena.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125669September 25, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to KeyArena; authorizing the renovation of KeyArena into a world-class, multi-purpose sports and entertainment arena at Seattle Center, including its design, construction, lease, financing, and future operation; authorizing the Mayor to execute agreements with Seattle Arena Company, LLC, for the renovation and lease of the Arena, including a lease agreement, a development agreement, an integration agreement, and other related agreements; exempting the renovation and future operation of the Arena from the requirements of Chapter 20.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute future joint purchasing agreements with Seattle Arena Company, LLC, notwithstanding Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 20.60; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $150,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119339 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125676October 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2018-2023 CIP; creating non-exempt positions; creating a new budget summary level; amending existing CIP project descriptions; creating a new fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $24,665,720. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Phone: CBO Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle Public Utilities.CB 119355 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125686October 10, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; amending Sections 21.33.030 and 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust drainage rates.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $34,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Updates Seattle Public Utilities.CB 119356 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125685October 10, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; amending Sections 21.28.040, 21.28.080, and 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust wastewater rates.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $76,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild to be effective….CB 119368 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceCollective BargainingCompensation & Benefits Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild to be effective….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125693November 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceCollective BargainingCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild to be effective January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020; amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), by increasing appropriations to the Seattle Police Department and the Police Relief and Pension Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $65,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2019 and 2020.CB 119349 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2019 and 2020.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125709November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2019 and 2020; and amending Sections 21.49.020, 21.49.030, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.058, 21.49.060, 21.49.065, and 21.49.085 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $967,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119391 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125699November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2018-2023 CIP; creating exempt positions; amending existing CIP project descriptions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $123,332,476. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119430 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125739December 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2018-2023 CIP; creating exempt positions; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $54,602,307. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates City employment.CB 118910 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates City employment.

OutcomeEnacted as ORD 125260February 17, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; amending Sections 4.20.055, 4.26.010, 4.27.010, 4.27.020, and 4.27.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adding a new Chapter 4.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code, consisting of Sections 4.29.010, 4.29.020, 4.29.030, 4.29.040, 4.29.050, 4.29.060, 4.29.070, 4.29.080, 4.29.090, and 4.29.100, all to provide additional Paid Parental Leave and a new Paid Family Care Leave benefit to eligible city employees; establishing other conditions of implementing the new leave benefits; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,600,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Establishes the Seattle Renters’ Commission, representing the interests of renters located in Seattle, to advise and make recommendations to the Mayor and….CB 118921 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the Seattle Renters’ Commission, representing the interests of renters located in Seattle, to advise and make recommendations to the Mayor and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125280March 31, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to renters; establishing the Seattle Renters’ Commission, representing the interests of renters located in Seattle, to advise and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council on public policy matters of importance to renters citywide; amending Section 3.35.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding a new Chapter 3.65, consisting of Sections 3.65.010, 3.65.015, 3.65.020, 3.65.030, 3.65.040, 3.65.050, and 3.65.060, to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Updates land use and zoning, amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code) to rezone certain land….CB 118940 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning, amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code) to rezone certain land….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125291April 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code) to rezone certain land in Downtown, South Lake Union and adjacent IC zones; amending Sections 23.41.012, 23.48.220, 23.48.225, 23.48.230, 23.48.232, 23.48.235, 23.48.245, 23.48.250, 23.48.285, 23.49.008, 23.49.011, 23.49.013, 23.49.014, 23.49.019, 23.49.041, 23.49.058, 23.49.156, 23.49.158, 23.49.164, 23.50.020, 23.50.026, 23.50.028, 23.50.033, 23.50.039, 23.50.053, 23.50.055, 23.52.008, 23.58B.040, 23.58B.050, 23.58C.025, 23.58C.030, 23.58C.035, 23.58C.040, 23.58C.050, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.86.007 and 25.05.675 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending the Downtown Overlay Maps in Chapter 23.49 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding new Sections 23.48.223, 23.48.231, 23.48.290, 23.49.007, 23.49.039, 23.50.041, 23.58B.055, and 23.58C.055 to the Seattle Municipal Code to implement Mandatory Housing Affordability requirements in Downtown and South Lake Union.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $190,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118950 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125302May 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts, all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118952 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125304May 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2017-2022 CIP; creating both new exempt and non-exempt positions; modifying positions; making cash transfers between various City funds; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,325,351. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118989 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125338June 30, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2017-2022 CIP; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $103,542,573. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Repealing Chapter 14.18 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC), consisting of Sections 14.18.10, 14.18.20, 14.18.30, and 14.18.40 SMC.CB 118930 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Repealing Chapter 14.18 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC), consisting of Sections 14.18.10, 14.18.20, 14.18.30, and 14.18.40 SMC.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125376August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
fiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s acquisition and use of surveillance technologies; repealing Chapter 14.18 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC), consisting of Sections 14.18.10, 14.18.20, 14.18.30, and 14.18.40 SMC; and adding a new Chapter 14.18 to the SMC, consisting of Sections 14.18.010, 14.18.020, 14.18.030, 14.18.040, 14.18.050, 14.18.060, 14.18.070, 14.18.080, and 14.18.090.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32) to rezone certain land in the Chinatown/International District.CB 118959 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32) to rezone certain land in the Chinatown/International District.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125371August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32) to rezone certain land in the Chinatown/International District; amending Sections 23.49.007, 23.49.008, 23.49.011, 23.49.013, 23.49.014, 23.49.023, 23.49.156, 23.49.158, 23.49.164, 23.49.208, 23.49.212, 23.49.242, 23.58B.040, 23.58B.050, 23.58C.035, 23.58C.040, and 23.58C.050 to implement Mandatory Housing Affordability requirements in the Chinatown/International District; and amending Map A for Section 23.41.006, Design Review Board Districts, Map 1B, Map 1C, Map 1F, Map 1G and Map 1H for Section 23.49, Downtown Overlay Maps, Map A for Section 23.66.302, International Special Review District and Map B for Section 23.66.326, International District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (commonly known as the 2nd quarter supplemental).CB 119022 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (commonly known as the 2nd quarter supplemental).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125383August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (commonly known as the 2nd quarter supplemental); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2017-2022 CIP; creating both new exempt and non-exempt positions; making cash transfers between various City funds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $30,484,072. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget.CB 119046 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125379August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to automated fixed camera revenue; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the 2017 Budget; and amending Sections 5.81.010 and 5.82.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising water rates and charges for service to wholesale customers.CB 119051 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising water rates and charges for service to wholesale customers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125445November 17, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to water services of Seattle Public Utilities; revising water rates and charges for service to wholesale customers; and amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 21.04.440 in connection therewith.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Adjusts wastewater and drainage rates.CB 119075 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts wastewater and drainage rates.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125443November 17, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to wastewater and drainage services of Seattle Public Utilities; adjusting wastewater and drainage rates; amending Sections 21.28.040 and 21.33.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect the adjusted rates; and amending Section 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust credits to low-income wastewater and drainage customers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 5.54, Short-Term Rental Tax, to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119083 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 5.54, Short-Term Rental Tax, to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125442November 17, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson, Tim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to imposing a tax on engaging in the business of being a short-term rental operator; adding a new Chapter 5.54, Short-Term Rental Tax, to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 5.30.010, 5.30.060, 5.55.010, 5.55.040, 5.55.060, 5.55.150, 5.55.165, 5.55.220, and 5.55.230 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections and related fees by other….CB 119106 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections and related fees by other….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125451November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections and related fees by other departments, and technical corrections; amending Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 22.900B, General Provisions; Chapter 22.900C, Fees for Land Use Review; Chapter 22.900D, Fees for New and Altered Buildings and Equipment; Chapter 22.900E, Fees for Certificates and Registrations; Chapter 22.900F, Compliance and Other Inspections; and Chapter 22.900G, Fees Collected for Other Departments.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $80,245,428. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2018, representing an increase above the regular….CB 119118 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2018, representing an increase above the regular….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125477November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the levy of regular property taxes by The City of Seattle for collection in 2018, representing an increase above the regular property taxes levied for collection in 2017; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,960,036. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (commonly known as the 3rd quarter supplemental).CB 119123 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (commonly known as the 3rd quarter supplemental).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125448November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (commonly known as the 3rd quarter supplemental); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2017-2022 CIP; making cash transfers between various City funds; transferring positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $25,995,947. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to KeyArena.CB 119088 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to KeyArena.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125480December 6, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez, Bruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to KeyArena; authorizing the Mayor to execute a memorandum of understanding with Oak View Group, LLC, regarding the redevelopment of KeyArena into a world-class, multi-purpose sports and entertainment arena at Seattle Center, including its design, construction, lease, financing and future operation; exempting the redevelopment and future operation of the Arena from the requirements of Chapter 20.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $150,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (commonly known as the 4th quarter supplemental).CB 119156 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (commonly known as the 4th quarter supplemental).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125495December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (commonly known as the 4th quarter supplemental); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2017-2022 CIP; creating non-exempt positions; modifying positions; making cash transfers between various City funds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $39,804,327. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and certain unions in the Coalition of City Unions, for….CB 118604 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and certain unions in the Coalition of City Unions, for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124976January 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and certain unions in the Coalition of City Unions, for the time period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2018; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Joint Crafts Council.CB 118628 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Joint Crafts Council.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124998March 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Joint Crafts Council; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and certain unions.CB 118629 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and certain unions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124999March 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of collective bargaining agreements between The City of Seattle and certain unions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Washington State Council of County and City Employees….CB 118644 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Washington State Council of County and City Employees….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125016April 1, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Washington State Council of County and City Employees, AFSCME, Local 21; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Public Service and Industrial Employees, Local 1239.CB 118645 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Public Service and Industrial Employees, Local 1239.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125014April 1, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Public Service and Industrial Employees, Local 1239; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Teamsters Local Union No. 117.CB 118646 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Teamsters Local Union No. 117.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125015April 1, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Teamsters Local Union No. 117; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts updated policies regarding the establishment and management of Parking and Business Improvement Areas for The City of Seattle.Res 31657 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 6 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts updated policies regarding the establishment and management of Parking and Business Improvement Areas for The City of Seattle.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting updated policies regarding the establishment and management of Parking and Business Improvement Areas for The City of Seattle; and superseding Resolution 30389.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $17,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118669 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125041May 27, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $16,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118671 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125043May 27, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; creating new appropriations; creating both exempt and nonexempt positions; modifying positions; adding new projects; making cash transfers between various City funds; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2016-2021 CIP; lifting a proviso; revising project descriptions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $17,808,725. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Washington State Council of County and City….CB 118682 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Washington State Council of County and City….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125046May 27, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Washington State Council of County and City Employees AFSCME, AFL-CIO Local 21C; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City Light Department.CB 118690 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125051June 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Section 21.49.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to remove an exception from eligibility to the Utility Discount Program for tenants of federally subsidized housing with utility allowances and to update and modify certain program provisions.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,400,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the title of Chapter 21.76 and Sections 21.76.010, 21.76.020, 21.76.030, 21.76.040, 21.76.050, and 21.76.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify….CB 118687 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the title of Chapter 21.76 and Sections 21.76.010, 21.76.020, 21.76.030, 21.76.040, 21.76.050, and 21.76.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125050June 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; amending the title of Chapter 21.76 and Sections 21.76.010, 21.76.020, 21.76.030, 21.76.040, 21.76.050, and 21.76.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify eligibility rules for the Utility Discount Program to allow tenants of federally subsidized housing with utility allowances to participate in the program, to clarify the manner of providing rate credits for tenants that pay utility costs indirectly through rent, and to update and modify certain program provisions.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,708,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget.CB 118696 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & BenefitsBudget & Appropriations Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125057June 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & BenefitsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2016 Budget; amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels due to changes in City employment compensation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $67,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Dispatchers’ Guild.CB 118706 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Dispatchers’ Guild.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125067June 24, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Dispatchers’ Guild; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Teamsters Local Union No. 117.CB 118707 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Teamsters Local Union No. 117.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125068June 24, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and Teamsters Local Union No. 117; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget.CB 118718 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125076July 15, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget; creating new appropriations; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; making cash transfers between various City funds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising rates and charges for solid waste services.CB 118740 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid Waste Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising rates and charges for solid waste services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125111August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the solid waste system of Seattle Public Utilities; revising rates and charges for solid waste services; revising credits to low income customers for solid waste services; and amending Chapters 21.40 and 21.76 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118752 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125119September 9, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; creating both exempt and nonexempt positions; modifying positions; adding new projects; making cash transfers between various City funds; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2016-2021 CIP; revising project descriptions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $34,367,234. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No.….CB 118807 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No.….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125144September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77 Information Technology Professionals Unit; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No.….CB 118809 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No.….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125146September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77, Construction Maintenance Equipment Operator Unit; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No.….CB 118810 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No.….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125147September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77, Material Controllers Unit; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.058, 21.49.060, 21.49.065, 21.49.081, 21.49.082, 21.49.085, and 21.49.110, and repealing SMC….CB 118802 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.058, 21.49.060, 21.49.065, 21.49.081, 21.49.082, 21.49.085, and 21.49.110, and repealing SMC….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125171October 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2017 and 2018; amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.058, 21.49.060, 21.49.065, 21.49.081, 21.49.082, 21.49.085, and 21.49.110, and repealing SMC Section 21.49.080, in connection therewith.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $902,100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild.CB 118823 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125178November 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Department of Construction and Inspections and related fees by other departments.CB 118826 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Department of Construction and Inspections and related fees by other departments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125184November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Department of Construction and Inspections and related fees by other departments; amending Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 22.900A, Administration and Enforcement; Chapter 22.900B, General Provisions; Chapter 22.900C, Fees for Land Use Review; Chapter 22.900D, Fees for New and Altered Buildings and Equipment; Chapter 22.900E, Fees for Certificates and Registrations; Chapter 22.900F, Compliance and Other Inspections; Chapter 22.900G, Fees Collected for Other Departments; and Chapter 22.900H, Rental Registration and Inspection Ordinance Program Fees.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $70,450,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118843 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125201November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; creating both exempt and nonexempt positions; modifying positions; adding new projects; making cash transfers between various City funds; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2016-2021 CIP; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $70,042,206. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts wastewater and drainage rates to pass through increased treatment costs charged by King County.CB 118833 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts wastewater and drainage rates to pass through increased treatment costs charged by King County.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125191November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to wastewater and drainage services of Seattle Public Utilities; adjusting wastewater and drainage rates to pass through increased treatment costs charged by King County; amending Sections 21.28.040 and 21.33.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect the adjusted rates; amending Section 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust credits to low-income wastewater and drainage customers; and amending Section 21.33.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code to revise drainage service charge adjustment procedures.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $151,665,552. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118874 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125226December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2016-2021 CIP; modifying positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $52,887,598. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the operation of the Rate Stabilization Account, and amending Seattle Municipal Code 21.49.086.G.CB 118350 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the operation of the Rate Stabilization Account, and amending Seattle Municipal Code 21.49.086.G.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124752April 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; changing the operation of the Rate Stabilization Account, and amending Seattle Municipal Code 21.49.086.G.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $125,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 4.27 to the Seattle Municipal Code to provide a Paid Parental Leave Benefit to eligible city employees.CB 118356 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 4.27 to the Seattle Municipal Code to provide a Paid Parental Leave Benefit to eligible city employees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124753April 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adding a new Chapter 4.27 to the Seattle Municipal Code to provide a Paid Parental Leave Benefit to eligible city employees; amending Seattle Municipal Code Subsection 4.20.055 to provide the Paid Parental Leave benefit to eligible temporary workers; and establishing other conditions of implementing the new benefit.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,350,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Stormwater Code.CB 118362 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Stormwater Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124758April 24, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Stormwater Code; amending Sections 22.800.040, 22.805.050, and 22.805.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes withdrawals from the Water Fund Revenue Stabilization Subfund.CB 118369 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes withdrawals from the Water Fund Revenue Stabilization Subfund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124765May 8, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to rates and charges for water services of Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing withdrawals from the Water Fund Revenue Stabilization Subfund; revising water rates and charges, and credits to low income customers; and amending the Seattle Municipal Code Sections 21.04.430, 21.04.440, and 21.76.040.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,409,546. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending subsections 21.28.040.B and 21.76.040.A of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust the wastewater volume rate and adjust credits to low-income wastewater….CB 118416 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending subsections 21.28.040.B and 21.76.040.A of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust the wastewater volume rate and adjust credits to low-income wastewater….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124800July 7, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to wastewater services of Seattle Public Utilities; and amending subsections 21.28.040.B and 21.76.040.A of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust the wastewater volume rate and adjust credits to low-income wastewater customers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,073,484. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Updates drainage services of Seattle Public Utilities.CB 118417 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates drainage services of Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124801July 7, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to drainage services of Seattle Public Utilities; amending Sections 21.33.010, 21.33.030, and 21.33.040, and subsection 21.76.040.A of the Seattle Municipal Code to update definitions; adjust drainage rates and provide clarification regarding assignment of parcels to rate categories; define additional conditions under which rate credits may be applicable; and revise credits to low-income drainage customers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $21,789,603. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Related to the regulation of marijuana businesses.CB 118419 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the regulation of marijuana businesses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124807July 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the regulation of marijuana businesses; adding a new Chapter 6.500 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, making cash transfers between various City funds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $537,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118453 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124838August 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2015 Budget; amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; creating new appropriations; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2015-2020 CIP; creating both exempt and nonexempt positions; abrogating positions, modifying positions, making cash transfers between various City funds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,512,325. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring the reporting of lost and stolen firearms.CB 118436 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requiring the reporting of lost and stolen firearms.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124834August 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE requiring the reporting of lost and stolen firearms; and creating a new Chapter 10.78 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $181,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Ensuring that the City’s local program for stormwater regulation meets substantive requirements of the State Department of Ecology.CB 118466 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Ensuring that the City’s local program for stormwater regulation meets substantive requirements of the State Department of Ecology.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124873September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the implementation of the 2016 Stormwater Code update; ensuring that the City’s local program for stormwater regulation meets substantive requirements of the State Department of Ecology; amending Sections 22.170.120, 23.22.028, 23.22.074, 23.24.050, and 23.76.032 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Section 106 of the 2012 Seattle Building Code; and amending Section R105 of the 2012 Seattle Residential Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $569,778. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to special permits for the limited movement of vehicles carrying sealed ocean-going containers in excess of the legal weight limits.CB 118366 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to special permits for the limited movement of vehicles carrying sealed ocean-going containers in excess of the legal weight limits.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124890October 30, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ORDINANCE related to special permits for the limited movement of vehicles carrying sealed ocean-going containers in excess of the legal weight limits; adopting a new chapter 11.61 to the Seattle Municipal Code establishing such a special permit system; authorizing the Department of Transportation to execute agreements with the Port of Seattle to accept funds; creating a Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Officer position to monitor and enforce the heavy haul network and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Finding that a risk to public health and safety exists in the City of Seattle.CB 118554 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesPublic HealthBudget & Appropriations Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Finding that a risk to public health and safety exists in the City of Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124892November 3, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesPublic HealthBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to homelessness in the City of Seattle; finding that a risk to public health and safety exists in the City of Seattle; authorizing the loan of funds from the City’s Consolidated (Residual) Cash Pool, or its participating funds, in the amount of $5,000,000 into the General Subfund; providing for the repayment of said loan; and amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $43,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118546 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124905December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $11,040,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118530 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124900December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2015 Budget; amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2015-2020 CIP; creating both exempt and nonexempt positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $56,664,313. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to ending the square footage business tax for periods after December 31, 2015.CB 118547 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to ending the square footage business tax for periods after December 31, 2015.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124910December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to ending the square footage business tax for periods after December 31, 2015; and amending Section 5.46.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to cable television.CB 118549 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to cable television.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124957December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to cable television; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to enter into a renewed Cable Television Franchise Agreement with Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC; and authorizing the Chief Technology Officer to enter into other agreements for the purpose of implementing or administering the renewed franchise.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $87,518,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 2Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118581 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124962December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2015 Budget; amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2015-2020 CIP; creating both exempt and nonexempt positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,034,348. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapters 14.16, 14.17, 14.19, and 14.20 of the Seattle Municipal Code to prescribe additional remedies and enforcement procedures, harmonize ordinance language….CB 118585 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 6 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapters 14.16, 14.17, 14.19, and 14.20 of the Seattle Municipal Code to prescribe additional remedies and enforcement procedures, harmonize ordinance language….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124960December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; amending Chapters 14.16, 14.17, 14.19, and 14.20 of the Seattle Municipal Code to prescribe additional remedies and enforcement procedures, harmonize ordinance language, and add provisions to facilitate compliance; amending Section 3.14.931 of the Seattle Municipal Code to update duties of the Seattle Human Rights Commission; and amending Section 5.55.230 of the Seattle Municipal Code to require labor standards compliance for business license tax certificates.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $46,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends temporary floodplain rules for six months so residents can continue obtaining federal flood insurance.CB 121143 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends temporary floodplain rules for six months so residents can continue obtaining federal flood insurance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127384January 20, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsEddie Lin
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; tenth extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to obtain flood insurance through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Program.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Aligns Seattle Police rules for asking about immigration status with Washington state law.CB 121180 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originPolice Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Aligns Seattle Police rules for asking about immigration status with Washington state law.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127413April 6, 2026
Official sponsorsEddie Lin
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to inquiries into immigration status; changing the requirements for circumstances where Seattle Police Department personnel may inquire into a person’s citizenship or immigration status to align the Seattle Municipal Code with state law; and amending Section 4.18.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves settlement and operating agreements needed to renew the federal license for the Skagit hydroelectric project.CB 121177 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves settlement and operating agreements needed to renew the federal license for the Skagit hydroelectric project.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127414April 9, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Mayor or her designee to execute a Comprehensive Settlement Agreement, five Off-License Agreements, and other related agreements for purposes of relicensing The City of Seattle’s Skagit River Hydroelectric Project before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,800,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adds funding for Seattle's homelessness response to the adopted 2026 budget.CB 121185 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adds funding for Seattle's homelessness response to the adopted 2026 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127424April 27, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s response to homelessness; amending Ordinance 127362, which adopted the 2026 Budget, including the 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,221,868. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a five-year City Light agreement supporting electrification of Washington State Ferries' Seattle terminal.CB 121228 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a five-year City Light agreement supporting electrification of Washington State Ferries' Seattle terminal.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127453June 26, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the execution of a five-year agreement with Washington State Ferries, a division of the Washington State Department of Transportation, for the construction of system improvements associated with Pier 48 and the Seattle Terminal (Colman Dock, Pier 52) Electrification Project and negotiation and execution of an operations agreement; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,700,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts county conservation funding for Seattle park and open-space acquisition projects.CB 121229 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts county conservation funding for Seattle park and open-space acquisition projects.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127454June 26, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds; authorizing the Mayor or designee to enter into Amendment 6 to the Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between King County and The City of Seattle for Open Space Acquisition Projects; authorizing the deposit of both the 2025 reallocations and the 2026 allocations from King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds into The City of Seattle’s Park and Recreation Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $39,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Allows City Light to enter long-term agreements to acquire electricity, transmission, and related power services.CB 121241 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allows City Light to enter long-term agreements to acquire electricity, transmission, and related power services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127465July 9, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricityfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Department to enter into long-term agreements for the acquisition of electric power, including attributes, transmission, or ancillary services; and amending Section 21.49.130 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the implementation and evaluation plan for Seattle's Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy.CB 121240 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & Education Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the implementation and evaluation plan for Seattle's Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127481August 3, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the 2025 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy; approving an implementation and evaluation plan as required by Ordinance 127238; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,258,300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Education and Early Learning. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expands eligibility and updates terms for emergency assistance with City Light bills.CB 121247 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expands eligibility and updates terms for emergency assistance with City Light bills.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127489August 11, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the City Light Department’s emergency bill assistance program; amending Section 21.49.042 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust program terms and conditions and expand eligibility guidelines for emergency bill assistance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,200,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expands eligibility and updates terms for emergency assistance with Seattle Public Utilities bills.CB 121246 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expands eligibility and updates terms for emergency assistance with Seattle Public Utilities bills.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127490August 11, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to emergency assistance for Seattle Public Utilities customers; amending Section 21.76.065 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust program terms and conditions and expand eligibility guidelines for emergency bill assistance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the federal licensing settlement for City Light's Boundary Hydroelectric Project.CB 121269 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the federal licensing settlement for City Light's Boundary Hydroelectric Project.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127494August 14, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light or designee to execute the First Amendment to Boundary Hydroelectric Project Relicensing Settlement Agreement and other related agreements for amending the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License for the Boundary Hydroelectric Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Lets Seattle Parks pursue state conservation grants and commit city property to the recreation projects they fund.Res 32213 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Lets Seattle Parks pursue state conservation grants and commit city property to the recreation projects they fund.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 14, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of Seattle Parks and Recreation and to legally bind The City of Seattle with respect to certain projects and obligate City of Seattle property in perpetuity for which the City seeks grant funding assistance managed through the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,090,001. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Regulates rental fees, expands disclosure and recordkeeping requirements, and strengthens enforcement.CB 121254 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Regulates rental fees, expands disclosure and recordkeeping requirements, and strengthens enforcement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127497August 18, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to rental agreement regulation; requiring disclosure of fees, prohibiting and limiting certain fees, requiring retention of compliance records, expanding investigation authority, and establishing new enforcement mechanisms; amending Section 7.24.020, 7.24.050, 7.24.060, 7.24.120, and 7.24.130 of, and adding new Sections 7.24.039, 7.24.040, 7.24.045, 7.24.170, 7.24.180, 7.24.190, 7.24.200, 7.24.210, 7.24.220, 7.24.230, and 7.24.240 to, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,435,200. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office/Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 disqualified
Authorizes agreements for redeveloping Lake City Community Center with affordable housing and underground parking.CB 121291 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originAffordable HousingParks & RecreationLibraries & Community Facilities Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes agreements for redeveloping Lake City Community Center with affordable housing and underground parking.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127511September 24, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingParks & RecreationLibraries & Community Facilities
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and record (as necessary) all instruments and agreements concerning the City-owned property associated with the redevelopment of the Lake City Community Center into a new community center, affordable housing, and a subterranean garage; superseding the requirements of Ordinance 118477 for the purposes of this ordinance; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $38,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends temporary floodplain rules for six months so residents can obtain federal flood insurance.CB 120927 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends temporary floodplain rules for six months so residents can obtain federal flood insurance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127179February 4, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; eighth extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to obtain flood insurance through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Program.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Seattle Parks to apply for and manage state recreation and conservation grants.Res 32164 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Seattle Parks to apply for and manage state recreation and conservation grants.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 6, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to legally bind The City of Seattle with respect to certain projects for which the City seeks grant funding assistance managed through the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $58,920,111. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Removes a spending restriction from Seattle Transportation’s adopted 2025 budget.CB 120946 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Removes a spending restriction from Seattle Transportation’s adopted 2025 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127189March 14, 2025
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation; amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); and lifting a proviso.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $178,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes continued Lower Duwamish Superfund cleanup agreements, grants, spending, and cost sharing.CB 120960 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originParks & RecreationElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes continued Lower Duwamish Superfund cleanup agreements, grants, spending, and cost sharing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127201April 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Lower Duwamish Waterway; authorizing Seattle City Light and Seattle Public Utilities to: continue expending funds to participate in environmental investigation and remediation of the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site, according to the terms of a Consent Decree with the United States and the State of Washington and according to the terms of settlements with multiple other parties; accept funds from other parties and indemnify them according to settlement agreements with those parties; continue seeking and accepting state Remedial Action Grants for work related to the Superfund Site; commit to spend funds pursuant to the terms of additional orders from the federal and state regulatory agencies for remedial work at sites related to the Lower Duwamish, including T-108, South Park Marina, and North Boeing Field/Georgetown Steam Plant; and commit to sharing costs with other parties regarding those Related Sites; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $667,842,290. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates operating, safety, and enforcement requirements for after-hours nightlife lounges.CB 120956 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates operating, safety, and enforcement requirements for after-hours nightlife lounges.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127202April 18, 2025
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle, Sara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the regulation of after-hours nightlife lounges; defining after-hours nightlife lounges; establishing operational and safety requirements for such businesses; describing enforcement mechanisms; and adding a new Chapter 10.10 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Expands traffic-camera uses, authorizes civilian review, and updates camera-revenue policies.CB 120971 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTraffic Safety Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expands traffic-camera uses, authorizes civilian review, and updates camera-revenue policies.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127213May 16, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to automated traffic safety cameras; establishing additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras to increase safety; authorizing qualified civilian employees to review violations detected by traffic cameras; updating finance and fund policies related to the use of camera revenues; amending Ordinance 124230; amending Sections 5.82.010, 11.31.020, 11.31.090, 11.31.121, and 11.50.570 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 11.50.580 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises appropriations in Seattle’s 2024 budget and capital program.CB 120979 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises appropriations in Seattle’s 2024 budget and capital program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127230June 13, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget, including the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,800,043. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates zoning and permitting rules for light-rail facilities.CB 120975 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originTransitZoning Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates zoning and permitting rules for light-rail facilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127228June 13, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitZoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; addressing signage; clarifying requirements and supporting efficient permitting processes for light rail transit facilities; adding new Sections 23.55.070, 23.80.006, and 23.80.008 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 3.58.010, 3.58.080, 23.40.006, 23.40.080, 23.42.040, 23.42.055, 23.47A.004, 23.48.005, 23.49.002, 23.49.042, 23.49.090, 23.49.142, 23.49.300, 23.49.318, 23.50A.040, 23.51A.002, 23.51A.004, 23.52.004, 23.54.015, 23.55.056, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.76.010, 23.76.012, 23.76.015, 23.76.020, 23.76.026, 23.76.028, 23.76.029, 23.80.002, 23.80.004, 23.84A.026, 23.84A.038, 23.88.020, 25.08.655, 25.09.300, and 25.11.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,800,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises appropriations across departments and funds in Seattle’s 2025 budget.CB 120988 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises appropriations across departments and funds in Seattle’s 2025 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127231June 13, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle’s commute-trip-reduction plan and related municipal code.CB 120984 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle’s commute-trip-reduction plan and related municipal code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127229June 13, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program; adopting an updated CTR Plan; updating references to state law; and amending Sections 25.02.020, 25.02.030, 25.02.040, 25.02.050, 25.02.090, and 25.02.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,459,100. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves Seattle’s participation in a six-year countywide emergency-medical-services levy.CB 120996 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMSTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves Seattle’s participation in a six-year countywide emergency-medical-services levy.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127235June 23, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to emergency medical services; authorizing execution, pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, of an agreement with King County regarding the imposition and allocation of property tax revenues generated by a six-year, voter-approved King County-wide tax levy for emergency medical services; approving the submittal by King County of a proposition to the voters seeking authority to levy those additional taxes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $80,880,898. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Allows interactive media kiosks downtown and in participating business improvement areas.CB 120992 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective BargainingNeighborhoods Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allows interactive media kiosks downtown and in participating business improvement areas.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127240July 1, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective BargainingNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Downtown Seattle Association permission to install, maintain, and operate interactive media kiosks in public places located in the Metropolitan Improvement District and in other participating Business Improvement Areas, for a 16.5-year term, renewable for one successive 13.5-year term; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; suspending and superseding Sections 15.12.010, 23.55.001-23.55.003, 23.55.005, 23.55.008, 23.55.014, 23.55.015, 23.55.022, 23.55.024, 23.55.028, 23.55.030, 23.55.034, and 23.55.036 of the Seattle Municipal Code to the extent inconsistent; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and authorizing the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with Downtown Seattle Association.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Prohibits landlords from using shared algorithms to set residential rents in Seattle.CB 121000 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Prohibits landlords from using shared algorithms to set residential rents in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127241July 1, 2025
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to prohibiting algorithmic rent fixing; and adding a new Chapter 7.34 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 disqualified
Authorizes a management agreement for Seattle’s municipal golf courses.CB 120999 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a management agreement for Seattle’s municipal golf courses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127243July 8, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into a golf course management agreement with Premier Golf Centers, L.L.C. for the operation of the City of Seattle’s municipal golf courses located at Jackson Park Golf Course, Bill Wright Golf Complex at Jefferson Park, Interbay Golf Center, and West Seattle Golf Course and their related facilities; authorizing the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to set golf fees consistent with that golf course management agreement; and authorizing Premier Golf Centers, L.L.C. to charge and collect fees on behalf of Seattle Parks and Recreation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,102,447. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the South Lake Union and downtown infrastructure funding plan.CB 121008 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & Habitat Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the South Lake Union and downtown infrastructure funding plan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127252July 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending the Landscape Conservation and Infrastructure Program Funding Plan for South Lake Union and Downtown as adopted by Ordinance 124286.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts housing and community-development plans, accepts federal grants, and adjusts appropriations.CB 121034 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts housing and community-development plans, accepts federal grants, and adjusts appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127257August 1, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting Annual Action Plan updates to the 2024 - 2028 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development; authorizing submission of the Annual Action Plans to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); authorizing acceptance of grant funds from HUD for programs and activities included in the 2025 Annual Action Plans; amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, by modifying appropriations to various departments and budget control levels in the 2025 Adopted Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $30,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHuman Services Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends interim floodplain regulations for an additional six months.CB 121013 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends interim floodplain regulations for an additional six months.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127258August 4, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; ninth extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to obtain flood insurance through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Program.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sends a business-tax measure funding housing and services to Seattle voters.CB 121028 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-originHuman Services & Food SecuritySmall BusinessTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sends a business-tax measure funding housing and services to Seattle voters.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127259August 4, 2025
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecuritySmall BusinessTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the business and occupation tax; requesting that a special election be held concurrent with the November 4, 2025 general election for submission to the qualified electors of the City a proposition to lift the limit on business and occupation tax rates under RCW 35.21.711, authorize the City to levy additional taxes for the purposes of providing housing, human services, workforce, and small business support, increase the business and occupation tax threshold, create a business and occupation tax standard deduction, create offsetting credits for certain eligible businesses, and revise the business license tax consistent with changes to the business and occupation tax; adding a new Section 5.45.105 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Sections 5.45.050, 5.45.100, 5.55.030, and 5.55.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code; proposing a ballot title; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $385,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises 2025 appropriations and allocations for City capital projects.CB 121032 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises 2025 appropriations and allocations for City capital projects.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127265August 7, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2025-2030 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Increases financing and appropriations for the Human Capital Management System project.CB 121033 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Increases financing and appropriations for the Human Capital Management System project.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127266August 7, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Human Capital Management System project; amending Ordinance 127131 to increase the amount of an existing interfund loan; creating the 2026 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund, and allowing it to be a borrowing fund for the loan; amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; revising project allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2025-2030 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $63,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Finance. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets public-safety funding priorities for a potential local sales tax.Res 32174 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets public-safety funding priorities for a potential local sales tax.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 12, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting out public-safety related funding priorities in anticipation of a proposal that the City impose the additional one-tenth of one percent local option public safety sales tax authorized by the 2025 State Legislature.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $35,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Harbor Island Superfund cleanup agreements and shared remediation costs.CB 121043 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Harbor Island Superfund cleanup agreements and shared remediation costs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127286September 5, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Harbor Island Superfund Site; authorizing Seattle Public Utilities and Seattle City Light to agree to orders issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency regarding remediation of contamination at the East Waterway Operable Unit of the Harbor Island Superfund Site; and authorizing Seattle Public Utilities and Seattle City Light to enter into agreements with other parties to implement and share the costs of implementing those orders, including making commitments to expend funds not contemplated in the annual budget, consistent with RCW 35.32A.070.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $401,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a 2022–2026 labor agreement with Seattle Fire Chiefs.CB 121065 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a 2022–2026 labor agreement with Seattle Fire Chiefs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127288September 11, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Fire Chiefs’ Association, IAFF, Local 2898, effective from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2026; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,730,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requires disclosures and consumer protections when soliciting residential property owners.CB 121039 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requires disclosures and consumer protections when soliciting residential property owners.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127292September 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential property transactions; requiring certain disclosures to owners before presenting an offer to purchase a residential property; establishing consumer protections for owners of solicited residential property; and adding a new Chapter 6.610 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a 16-year power-purchase agreement with the Bonneville Power Administration.CB 121062 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a 16-year power-purchase agreement with the Bonneville Power Administration.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127295September 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the execution of a 16-year power purchase agreement with the Bonneville Power Administration and related agreements.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $17,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes operating rules for the Council District and District Project funds.Res 32179 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes operating rules for the Council District and District Project funds.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 26, 2025
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding the operation of a Council District Fund/District Project Fund as provided in the 2025 Adopted Budget and 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program through Council Budget Action SDOT 003-A-1.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the mayoral emergency proclamation responding to the federal shutdown and SNAP disruption.Res 32186 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Modifies the mayoral emergency proclamation responding to the federal shutdown and SNAP disruption.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 4, 2025
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION modifying the October 30, 2025 Mayoral Civil Emergency Proclamation regarding the federal government shutdown and the disruption to SNAP benefits for Seattleites.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $16,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a 2026 memorandum for City Light information-technology employees.CB 121098 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a 2026 memorandum for City Light information-technology employees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127334November 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 77, Information Technology Professionals’ Unit for the period effective from January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $71,182,742. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle’s fees for using public streets and sidewalks.CB 121106 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle’s fees for using public streets and sidewalks.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127346November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending the Street Use Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,764,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedTransportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Establishes Seattle Parks and Recreation’s comprehensive fee schedule for 2026.CB 121107 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes Seattle Parks and Recreation’s comprehensive fee schedule for 2026.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127347November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; establishing the 2026 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services; and superseding previous park and recreation fee schedules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $41,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Levies Seattle property taxes for 2026, including debt-service requirements.CB 121119 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Levies Seattle property taxes for 2026, including debt-service requirements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127354November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; levying taxes on all real and personal property in The City of Seattle, for the year beginning on the first day of January 2026, as allowed by and for the purposes of the laws authorizing those taxes, which include providing for general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $917,539,012. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Removes obsolete restrictions governing the use of sweetened-beverage-tax proceeds.CB 121108 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Removes obsolete restrictions governing the use of sweetened-beverage-tax proceeds.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127348November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Sweetened Beverage Tax; amending Section 5.53.055 of the Seattle Municipal Code to remove obsolete guidance on use of proceeds and remove non-supplantation funding provisions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,400,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes general-obligation bonds for capital improvements and other approved City purposes.CB 121103 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes general-obligation bonds for capital improvements and other approved City purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127344November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay or reimburse all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and for other City purposes approved by ordinance and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; amending Ordinance 123480, as previously amended by Ordinances 124341, 124637, and 124924; Ordinance 124053, as previously amended by Ordinances 124146 and 124341; Ordinance 124341, as previously amended by Ordinance 126938; Ordinance 124637, as previously amended by Ordinance 126938; Ordinance 124924, as previously amended by Ordinances 125986 and 126938; and Ordinance 125197, as previously amended by Ordinances 125456, 125715, and 125986; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $38,210,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Finance. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes electric-system improvements and revenue bonds to finance them.CB 121104 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes electric-system improvements and revenue bonds to finance them.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127345November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions, improvements, and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission, and distribution system of the City; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds to pay part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve fund requirement (if necessary), and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds and authorizing their issuance as either senior lien parity bonds or junior lien bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance / City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes drainage and wastewater improvements and revenue bonds to finance them.CB 121089 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes drainage and wastewater improvements and revenue bonds to finance them.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127337November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system; authorizing the issuance and sale of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds in one or more series for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of those bonds; amending certain sections and subsections of Ordinance 125455, as last amended by Ordinance 126482 (the “Omnibus Refunding Ordinance”); and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $128,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance / SPU. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes water-system improvements and revenue bonds to finance them.CB 121090 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes water-system improvements and revenue bonds to finance them.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127338November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system; authorizing the issuance and sale of water system revenue bonds in one or more series for the purposes of paying or reimbursing part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds; creating certain accounts of the City relating to the bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $108,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance / SPU. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes acceptance of outside grants, revenue-backed contracts, and related appropriations.CB 121115 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes acceptance of outside grants, revenue-backed contracts, and related appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127352November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding from non-City sources; authorizing the Mayor or designee to accept grants, enter into revenue-backed service contracts, and carry forward related appropriations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $177,323,842. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Increases Memorial Stadium bridge financing to $39.8 million and creates a bond fund.CB 121101 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originBridges & StructuresTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Increases Memorial Stadium bridge financing to $39.8 million and creates a bond fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127342November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Memorial Stadium redevelopment project; amending Ordinance 127125 to increase the amount of an existing interfund loan; creating the 2027 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund B, and allowing it to be a borrowing fund for the loan; and authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $39,800,000 from multiple city funds as bridge financing to the 2027 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund B for the Memorial Stadium redevelopment project.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $66,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Transfers graffiti-code enforcement from Seattle Public Utilities to Parks and Recreation.CB 121109 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers graffiti-code enforcement from Seattle Public Utilities to Parks and Recreation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127349November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to graffiti nuisance enforcement; transferring authority to enforce the City’s graffiti nuisance code from the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to the Superintendent of the Department of Parks and Recreation; and amending Section 10.07.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $850,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Approves a 2024–2027 labor agreement with the Seattle Police Management Association.CB 121132 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a 2024–2027 labor agreement with the Seattle Police Management Association.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127365December 11, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceCollective Bargainingfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Management Association to be effective from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2027; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a labor agreement and memorandum with the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild.CB 121133 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a labor agreement and memorandum with the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127366December 11, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
PoliceCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources/Labor Relations. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Overhauls neighborhood residential zoning and development standards to comply with state housing laws.CB 120993 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Overhauls neighborhood residential zoning and development standards to comply with state housing laws.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127376December 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; implementing a major update of Neighborhood Residential zones and modifying development standards in other zones to comply with various state laws; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99, 100, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 111, 112, 113, 114, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 216, 217, 219, 220, and 221 of the Official Land Use Map; amending Chapters 6.600, 14.08, 14.09, 15.32, 21.49, 22.214, 22.801, 22.907, 23.22, 23.24, 23.28, 23.30, 23.34, 23.42, 23.45, 23.47A, 23.48, 23.49, 23.50, 23.51A, 23.51B, 23.53, 23.54, 23.58C, 23.60A, 23.66, 23.72, 23.75, 23.76, 23.80, 23.84A, 23.86, 23.90, 23.91, 25.09, and 25.11 of the Seattle Municipal Code; renumbering existing subsection 23.54.015.K of the Seattle Municipal Code as Section 23.54.037 and further amending the section; renumbering existing subsections 23.54.030.F, 23.54.030.G, 23.54.030.K, and 23.54.030.L as Sections 23.54.031, 23.54.032, 23.54.033, and 23.54.034 and further amending the sections; repealing Chapter 23.44 and Sections 23.34.010, 23.34.012, 23.34.013, 23.34.072, 23.42.130, 23.45.512, 23.45.531, 23.86.010, and 25.09.260 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Chapter 23.44 and new Sections 23.42.024, 23.42.047, 23.42.132, 23.45.519, 23.45.560, 23.80.010, 23.80.012, 23.80.014, 25.09.055, and 25.11.025 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Ordinance 127219.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $40,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning & Community Development (OPCD). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends interim floodplain rules for six months while updated federal maps take effect.CB 120738 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends interim floodplain rules for six months while updated federal maps take effect.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126994February 13, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; sixth extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to obtain flood insurance through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Program.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a collective bargaining agreement with AFSCME Local 21SP.CB 120756 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a collective bargaining agreement with AFSCME Local 21SP.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127004April 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Washington State Council of County and City Employees, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Local 21SP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,812,105. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts 2023 and 2024 pay zones for the City's discretionary-pay programs.CB 120759 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originZoningCompensation & Benefits Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts 2023 and 2024 pay zones for the City's discretionary-pay programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127007April 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Pay Zone Ordinance; adjusting the pay zone structures for 2023 and 2024 for the City’s discretionary pay programs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $692,912,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources / Legislative. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts outside funding and adjusts 2024 operating and capital appropriations.CB 120752 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts outside funding and adjusts 2024 operating and capital appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127011April 19, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of various departments to accept and authorize the expenditure of specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget, including the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2024-2029 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,530,173. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Restates the City's guarantee and reimbursement agreement for public art museum facilities.CB 120779 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Restates the City's guarantee and reimbursement agreement for public art museum facilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127031May 30, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to public art museum facilities; authorizing a restatement of a guarantee and reimbursement agreement with the Museum Development Authority of Seattle and other parties that amends the second amended and restated guarantee and reimbursement agreement, as originally authorized by Ordinance 121950, as amended by Ordinance 122458, and as further amended by Ordinance 124429; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $61,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Finance. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a permanent police recruitment and retention program and transfers supporting positions.CB 120766 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPoliceBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates a permanent police recruitment and retention program and transfers supporting positions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127026May 30, 2024
Official sponsorsSara Nelson, Robert Kettle
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to recruitment and retention of police officers in the Seattle Police Department (SPD); transferring positions from Seattle Department of Human Resources (SDHR) to SPD; creating in SPD a recruitment and retention program; amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; amending Section 4.08.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $465,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes King County payments to Seattle Public Utilities for residual-waste disposal.CB 120790 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes King County payments to Seattle Public Utilities for residual-waste disposal.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127034May 30, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities, or designee, to execute an interlocal agreement with King County to receive payments for the disposal of residual waste from material recovery facilities in the City of Seattle; amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,027,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amends Seattle Repertory Theatre's use and occupancy agreement at Seattle Center.CB 120797 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amends Seattle Repertory Theatre's use and occupancy agreement at Seattle Center.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127045June 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute a Fourth Amendment to the Facility Use and Occupancy Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Repertory Theater; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a labor agreement with IBEW Local 77 equipment operators.CB 120795 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a labor agreement with IBEW Local 77 equipment operators.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127042June 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77 Construction Maintenance Equipment Operator Unit; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,097,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes City Light and Port of Seattle agreements for waterfront shore-power improvements.CB 120802 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes City Light and Port of Seattle agreements for waterfront shore-power improvements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127050July 9, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the execution of a two-year agreement with the Port of Seattle for the construction of system improvements associated with Terminal 46 and the Pier 66 Shore Power Project and negotiation and execution of an operations agreement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $44,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends interim floodplain rules another six months while updated federal maps take effect.CB 120808 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends interim floodplain rules another six months while updated federal maps take effect.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127064August 7, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; seventh extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to obtain flood insurance through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Program.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Parks and Recreation to bind the City for specified state grant applications.Res 32140 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Parks and Recreation to bind the City for specified state grant applications.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 7, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to legally bind The City of Seattle with respect to certain projects for which the City seeks grant funding assistance managed through the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,529,515. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes modifications to Seattle Public Utilities' federal wastewater consent decree.CB 120810 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes modifications to Seattle Public Utilities' federal wastewater consent decree.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127061August 7, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to submit for approval to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington a First Material Modification to the 2013 Consent Decree entered into by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the State of Washington Department of Ecology, and The City of Seattle in Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00678, and to fulfill the obligations set forth therein.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $74,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an agreement with South Correctional Entity for jail services.CB 120825 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an agreement with South Correctional Entity for jail services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127065August 9, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to jail services; authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with South Correctional Entity for the provision of jail services; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Creates drug-exclusion zones, related court orders, and penalties for violations.CB 120835 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates drug-exclusion zones, related court orders, and penalties for violations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127085September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Stay Out of Drug Area (SODA) zones; creating the ability to issue written orders to criminal defendants describing conditions of their pre-trial release or post-conviction conditions of sentence; creating SODA zones and providing for both the issuance of court orders relating to those zones and administration of those zones; creating the gross misdemeanor of violating a SODA order; and adding a new Chapter 12A.21 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLAW. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Revises eligibility geography and regional governance for the public-works Priority Hire program.CB 120815 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises eligibility geography and regional governance for the public-works Priority Hire program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127097October 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City public works and the priority hire program; modifying the methodology for determining which zip codes are Economically Distressed Areas; authorizing the creation of a regional Priority Hire Implementation and Advisory Committee; and amending Sections 20.37.010 and 20.37.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sends voters a proposal to fund social housing through the payroll expense tax.CB 120864 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & DebtElections Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sends voters a proposal to fund social housing through the payroll expense tax.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127101October 3, 2024
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Affordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & DebtElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding the Seattle Social Housing Developer; requesting that a special election be held on February 11, 2025 for submission to the qualified electors of the City of a proposition to fund the Seattle Social Housing Developer through the City’s existing Payroll Expense Tax; amending Section 5.38.055 of the Seattle Municipal Code; proposing a ballot title; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Loans $11 million to continue the City's human-capital management system project.CB 120880 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Loans $11 million to continue the City's human-capital management system project.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127131November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Human Capital Management System project; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $11,000,000 from the Finance and Administrative Services Fund to the 2025 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund for continuing the work of implementing the Human Capital Management System project; amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget, including the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to Finance and Administrative Services; and revising project allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2024-2029 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $61,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Finance. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Loans $9.3 million to support Memorial Stadium redevelopment.CB 120874 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Loans $9.3 million to support Memorial Stadium redevelopment.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127125November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Memorial Stadium redevelopment project; creating the 2026 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund B; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $9,300,000 from the REET I Capital Projects Fund to the 2026 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund B for the Memorial Stadium redevelopment project.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $40,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends a $25 million internal loan supporting transportation programs.CB 120885 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends a $25 million internal loan supporting transportation programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127136November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Seattle Department of Transportation; authorizing the extension of the loan of funds in the amount of $25,000,000 from the Information Technology Fund to the Transportation Fund to support essential transportation programs as authorized in Ordinance 126227; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $25,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates construction and inspection permit fees and makes technical corrections.CB 120882 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates construction and inspection permit fees and makes technical corrections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127133November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and technical corrections; repealing Chapter Section 22.504 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 22.504.010, 22.900B.010, 22.900B.020, 22.900C.010, 22.900D.010, 22.900D.090, 22.900D.100, 22.900D.110, 22.900D.140, 22.900D.150, 22.900D.160, 22.900E.020, 22.900E.030, 22.900E.040, 22.900E.050, 22.900G.010, and 22.900G.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,598,200. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle Fire Department permit, inspection, and plan-review fees.CB 120888 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originFire & EMSPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle Fire Department permit, inspection, and plan-review fees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127139November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Fire Department’s services and fees; adding and revising various Seattle Fire Department permit, inspection, and plan review fees and related provisions; amending Sections 22.602.010, 22.602.045, 22.602.050, 22.602.070, 22.602.080, and 22.602.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 112 of the 2021 Seattle Fire Code as adopted by Section 22.600.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code and as regulated and allowed by the State Building Code Act, chapter 19.27 of the Revised Code of Washington.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,807,436. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Fire Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates monetary penalties imposed for parking infractions in Seattle.CB 120890 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates monetary penalties imposed for parking infractions in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127141November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the monetary penalty for parking infractions; amending Section 11.31.121 of the Seattle Municipal Code to update penalties.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,900,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Municipal Court. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets 2025–2026 fees for Seattle parks, facilities, and recreation services.CB 120892 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sets 2025–2026 fees for Seattle parks, facilities, and recreation services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127143November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; establishing the 2025-2026 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services; and superseding previous park and recreation fee schedules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $45,473,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle's fee schedule for street and sidewalk use.CB 120884 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle's fee schedule for street and sidewalk use.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127135November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending the Street Use Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,679,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedTransportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Lifts a restriction on a Seattle Department of Transportation capital appropriation.CB 120886 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Lifts a restriction on a Seattle Department of Transportation capital appropriation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127137November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); and lifting a proviso.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $127,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets Seattle's 2025 property-tax levy for City operations and debt service.CB 120906 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sets Seattle's 2025 property-tax levy for City operations and debt service.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127152November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal, in The City of Seattle, to finance the departments and activities of City government and to provide for the general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements, for the year beginning on the first day of January 2025; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $796,966,695. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes limited-tax general-obligation bonds for capital projects and other City purposes.CB 120897 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes limited-tax general-obligation bonds for capital projects and other City purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127146November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay or reimburse all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and for other City purposes approved by ordinance and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; creating the 2025 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund; amending Ordinance 126219 (as previously amended by Ordinances 126288, 126479, and 126938) and Ordinance 126479; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $65,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Finance. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes City Light revenue bonds for electric-system improvements.CB 120898 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes City Light revenue bonds for electric-system improvements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127147November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission, and distribution system of the City; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds to pay part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve fund requirement (if necessary), and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the Bond Sale Terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds and authorizing their issuance as either senior lien parity bonds or junior lien bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance / City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes water-system revenue bonds for municipal water improvements.CB 120899 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes water-system revenue bonds for municipal water improvements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127148November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system; authorizing the issuance and sale of water system revenue bonds in one or more series for the purposes of paying or reimbursing part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds; creating certain accounts of the City relating to the bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $106,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance / SPU. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes departments to accept grants, sign revenue contracts, and carry forward appropriations.CB 120904 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes departments to accept grants, sign revenue contracts, and carry forward appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127151November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding from non-City sources; authorizing department directors to accept grants, enter into revenue-backed service contracts, and carry forward related appropriations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $146,212,690. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Reallocates payroll-expense-tax revenue and eliminates its oversight committee.CB 120912 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment Accountability Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Reallocates payroll-expense-tax revenue and eliminates its oversight committee.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127155November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Payroll Expense Tax; adjusting the allocation of tax proceeds; eliminating the Payroll Expense Oversight Committee; amending Section 5.38.055 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Section 5.38.105 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 3.35.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office/Legislative. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Accepts 2025 King County conservation funding for Seattle open-space projects.CB 120921 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts 2025 King County conservation funding for Seattle open-space projects.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127167December 19, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds; authorizing the Mayor or designee to enter into Amendment 5 to the Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between King County and The City of Seattle for Open Space Acquisition Projects; and authorizing the deposit of 2025 allocations from King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds into The City of Seattle’s Park and Recreation Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $8,750,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a fifth amendment to the Lease and Concession Agreement between The City….CB 120484 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a fifth amendment to the Lease and Concession Agreement between The City….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126754January 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a fifth amendment to the Lease and Concession Agreement between The City of Seattle and BH Music Center for Benaroya Hall.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and PROTEC17.CB 120505 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and PROTEC17.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126761February 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective BargainingBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and PROTEC17; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $882,176. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact CBO Contact. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Fourth extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow….CB 120487 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fourth extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126763February 15, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; fourth extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to obtain flood insurance through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Program.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports King County’s Crisis Care Centers Levy and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on the passage of this levy on the….Res 32085 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originElections Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports King County’s Crisis Care Centers Levy and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on the passage of this levy on the….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 16, 2023
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis, Teresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 1 abstained
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting King County’s Crisis Care Centers Levy and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on the passage of this levy on the April 25, 2023, special election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,250,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 1 abstained
Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Washington State Council of County and City….CB 120523 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Washington State Council of County and City….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126782March 16, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective BargainingBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Washington State Council of County and City Employees; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $933,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
To initiate a new Business Improvement Area (BIA) to be known as the Metropolitan Improvement District (MID).Res 32089 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

To initiate a new Business Improvement Area (BIA) to be known as the Metropolitan Improvement District (MID).

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION to initiate a new Business Improvement Area (BIA) to be known as the Metropolitan Improvement District (MID).

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Of intention to establish a new Metropolitan Improvement District (MID) and fix a date and place for a hearing thereon.Res 32090 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Of intention to establish a new Metropolitan Improvement District (MID) and fix a date and place for a hearing thereon.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION of intention to establish a new Metropolitan Improvement District (MID) and fix a date and place for a hearing thereon.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time for app-based workers working in Seattle.CB 120514 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time for app-based workers working in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126788March 29, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to app-based workers in Seattle; establishing labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time for app-based workers working in Seattle; adding a new Chapter 8.39 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 3.02.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $148,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to execute an interlocal agreement with King County….CB 120538 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to execute an interlocal agreement with King County….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126796April 20, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to execute an interlocal agreement with King County to receive payments for the disposal of residual waste from Material Recovery Facilities in the City of Seattle; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild.CB 120551 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126806May 9, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective BargainingBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Parking Enforcement Officers’ Guild; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,147,212. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the City's support for a new Memorial Stadium at Seattle Center to be developed through a public-private partnership between The City….Res 32092 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the City's support for a new Memorial Stadium at Seattle Center to be developed through a public-private partnership between The City….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 19, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing the City's support for a new Memorial Stadium at Seattle Center to be developed through a public-private partnership between The City of Seattle, Seattle Public Schools, and a private partner.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $66,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center Jackie Kirn Lisa Gaccione. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Balancing the need for housing production and increasing tree protections.CB 120534 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & Habitat Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Balancing the need for housing production and increasing tree protections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126821May 31, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to tree protection; balancing the need for housing production and increasing tree protections; and amending Sections 23.44.020, 23.47A.016, 23.48.055, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, and Chapter 25.11 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,270,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Construction and Inspections. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120572 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126826June 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,460,943. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests that a special election be held concurrent with the November 7, 2023 general election for submission to the qualified electors of….CB 120584 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment Accountability Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requests that a special election be held concurrent with the November 7, 2023 general election for submission to the qualified electors of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126837June 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to low-income housing; requesting that a special election be held concurrent with the November 7, 2023 general election for submission to the qualified electors of the City of a proposition to lift the limit on regular property taxes under chapter 84.55 RCW in order to authorize the City to levy additional taxes for low-income housing for up to seven years; providing for interim financing pending tax receipts; creating a levy oversight committee; requiring annual progress reports; providing for implementation of programs with funds derived from the taxes authorized; exempting certain seniors, veterans with disabilities, and other people with disabilities who qualify under RCW 84.36.381; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $970,260,175. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accompanying an ordinance requesting the 2023 Housing Levy Renewal and providing further direction regarding reporting and implementation of the programs to be….Res 32093 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accompanying an ordinance requesting the 2023 Housing Levy Renewal and providing further direction regarding reporting and implementation of the programs to be….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to low-income housing; accompanying an ordinance requesting the 2023 Housing Levy Renewal and providing further direction regarding reporting and implementation of the programs to be funded by such levy and other housing funds.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $970,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Concerning wage equity for non-profit human services workers.Res 32094 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originCompensation & BenefitsHuman Services & Food Security Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Concerning wage equity for non-profit human services workers.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 20, 2023
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Compensation & BenefitsHuman Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION concerning wage equity for non-profit human services workers; expressing the City Council’s intent to consider increasing human services contracts to support wage equity in collaboration with other funders; and requesting information and action from the Executive to advance human services workers wage equity.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,880,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2023 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.CB 120568 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2023 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126861July 25, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2023 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute contracts with Cedar Grove Composting, Inc. and Lenz Enterprises, Inc for organic….CB 120612 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute contracts with Cedar Grove Composting, Inc. and Lenz Enterprises, Inc for organic….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126872July 31, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute contracts with Cedar Grove Composting, Inc. and Lenz Enterprises, Inc for organic waste processing services; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $36,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the heads of various departments to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.CB 120614 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the heads of various departments to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126871July 31, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of various departments to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and Budget Control Levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2023-2028 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,201,548. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation, the Director of Finance, and the Director of the Office of the Waterfront and Civic….CB 120626 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation, the Director of Finance, and the Director of the Office of the Waterfront and Civic….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126874August 8, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation, the Director of Finance, and the Director of the Office of the Waterfront and Civic Projects to execute an amendment to the Operations and Management Agreement with the Seattle Aquarium Society; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $34,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks & Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Adopts The City of Seattle 2023 Annual Action Plan to the 2018-2023 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development.CB 120630 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts The City of Seattle 2023 Annual Action Plan to the 2018-2023 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126877August 11, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting The City of Seattle 2023 Annual Action Plan to the 2018-2023 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development; authorizing submission of the Annual Action Plan to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); authorizing acceptance of grant funds from HUD for programs and activities included in the 2023 Annual Action Plan; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, by modifying appropriations to various departments and budget control levels in the 2023 Adopted Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHuman Services Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares property at 8817 Seward Park Avenue S, commonly known as the Former Henderson St Pumping Plant, as surplus to the City’s….CB 120611 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares property at 8817 Seward Park Avenue S, commonly known as the Former Henderson St Pumping Plant, as surplus to the City’s….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126879August 14, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring property at 8817 Seward Park Avenue S, commonly known as the Former Henderson St Pumping Plant, as surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of this real property as a direct sale to Seattle Public Schools; authorizing the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute all documents for the sale of the property; designating the proceeds from the sale; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $238,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Fifth extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow….CB 120615 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fifth extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126885August 15, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; fifth extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and as amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to obtain flood insurance through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Program.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Of intention to disestablish the existing Seattle Tourism Improvement Area and fixing a date and place for a hearing thereon.Res 32106 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTourism & Workforce Development Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Of intention to disestablish the existing Seattle Tourism Improvement Area and fixing a date and place for a hearing thereon.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Tourism & Workforce Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION of intention to disestablish the existing Seattle Tourism Improvement Area and fixing a date and place for a hearing thereon.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified loans to partially finance costs related to the construction….CB 120639 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified loans to partially finance costs related to the construction….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126894September 8, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified loans to partially finance costs related to the construction of the South Thornton Natural Drainage System Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,968,150. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 9200 18th Ave SW.CB 120648 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationBudget & AppropriationsCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 9200 18th Ave SW.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126900September 27, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationBudget & AppropriationsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 9200 18th Ave SW; authorizing acceptance of a recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, including the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; making an appropriation from the Park and Recreation Fund for acquisition and related costs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,530,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to enter into Amendment 1 to the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the King County and the City of Seattle….CB 120629 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to enter into Amendment 1 to the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the King County and the City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126904October 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds; authorizing the Mayor to enter into Amendment 1 to the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the King County and the City of Seattle for Conservation Futures-Funded Open Space Acquisition Projects; and authorizing the deposit of 2021, 2022 and 2023 allocations from King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds into The City of Seattle’s Park and Recreation Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,025,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers properties collectively known as “Sites 5-11” to selected developers or their designees.CB 120660 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers properties collectively known as “Sites 5-11” to selected developers or their designees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126903October 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the transfer of City real property for housing development; transferring properties collectively known as “Sites 5-11” to selected developers or their designees; authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing or the Director’s designee to execute and deliver agreements for transfer of land, deeds, and related documents; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Sections 5.24.020 and 5.24.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to adjust the thresholds upon which the City Council is briefed….CB 120665 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Sections 5.24.020 and 5.24.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to adjust the thresholds upon which the City Council is briefed….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126910October 2, 2023
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Sections 5.24.020 and 5.24.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to adjust the thresholds upon which the City Council is briefed about settlement and claims matters in Executive Session; and amending SMC 5.24.020 to require twice-annual litigation briefings in Executive Session.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code) to rezone certain land in the Downtown Retail Core.CB 120632 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code) to rezone certain land in the Downtown Retail Core.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126917October 6, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code) to rezone certain land in the Downtown Retail Core; and amending Sections 23.49.008 and 23.49.058 of the Seattle Municipal Code to increase housing capacity and downtown activation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning & Community Development (OPCD). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Establishes the City’s continuing support to advance a public-private partnership through future agreements between The City of Seattle, Seattle Public Schools, and….Res 32110 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originYouth & Education Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the City’s continuing support to advance a public-private partnership through future agreements between The City of Seattle, Seattle Public Schools, and….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 6, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing the City’s continuing support to advance a public-private partnership through future agreements between The City of Seattle, Seattle Public Schools, and the One Roof Partnership; and addressing funding needs to develop a new world-class Memorial Stadium serving students, youth, and the community and that is transformative for Seattle Center.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $66,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center Jackie Kirn Sarah Burtner. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Transportation to enter into a lease agreement on behalf of the City of Seattle with the Cultural Space….CB 120666 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Transportation to enter into a lease agreement on behalf of the City of Seattle with the Cultural Space….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126916October 6, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation; authorizing the Director of Transportation to enter into a lease agreement on behalf of the City of Seattle with the Cultural Space Agency, a city-chartered Public Development Authority, for its use and occupancy of a portion of King Street Station; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development (“Plan”) and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing….CB 120668 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development (“Plan”) and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126926October 26, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting the 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development (“Plan”) and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $80,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHuman Services Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Department of Transportation.CB 120701 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Department of Transportation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126949December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation; amending Section 11.16.121 of the Seattle Municipal Code to set new limits on parking rates at parking payment devices.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,800,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay or reimburse all or part of….CB 120683 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay or reimburse all or part of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126938December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay or reimburse all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and for other City purposes approved by ordinance and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; creating the 2024 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund; amending Ordinance 123751 (as previously amended by Ordinances 124341 and 124637), Ordinance 124341, Ordinance 124637, Ordinance 124924 (as previously amended by Ordinance 125986), Ordinance 125456, Ordinance 125715 (as previously amended by Ordinance 125986), and Ordinance 126219 (as previously amended by Ordinances 126288 and 126479); and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $84,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Finance. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….CB 120684 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126939December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission, and distribution system of the City; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds to pay part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve fund requirement (if necessary), and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the Bond Sale Terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds and authorizing their issuance as either senior lien parity bonds or junior lien bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $400,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance / City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.CB 120686 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126941December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system; authorizing the issuance and sale of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds in one or more series for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of those bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $95,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance/SPU Kristi Beattie. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126716 to increase the authorized principal amount of municipal water system revenue bonds to be issued for the purposes of….CB 120687 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126716 to increase the authorized principal amount of municipal water system revenue bonds to be issued for the purposes of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126942December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; amending Ordinance 126716 to increase the authorized principal amount of municipal water system revenue bonds to be issued for the purposes of paying all or part of the cost of carrying out the system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system; extending the initial authorization date for those bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $99,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Finance/SPU Kristi Beattie. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 123761 to extend the duration of the existing interfund loan to the Central Waterfront Improvement Fund.CB 120691 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 123761 to extend the duration of the existing interfund loan to the Central Waterfront Improvement Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126946December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Central Waterfront Improvement Program; amending Ordinance 123761 to extend the duration of the existing interfund loan to the Central Waterfront Improvement Fund; and increasing the amount of the existing interfund loan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $110,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of the Waterfront and Civic Projects. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Park District.CB 120690 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Park District.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126945December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Park District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $123,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….CB 120693 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126947December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal, in The City of Seattle, to finance the departments and activities of City government and to provide for the general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements for the year beginning on the first day of January 2024; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $703,313,892. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends an existing deduction for non-profit healthcare entities and making the deduction subject to increases that account for inflation.CB 120689 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originPublic HealthTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends an existing deduction for non-profit healthcare entities and making the deduction subject to increases that account for inflation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126944December 1, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Public HealthTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to deductions from the payroll expense tax; extending an existing deduction for non-profit healthcare entities and making the deduction subject to increases that account for inflation; and amending Sections 5.38.045 and 5.38.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,200,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes material scope changes to increase the share of Proposition 1 dollars that can be spent on transit capital projects intended to….CB 120704 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originTransitElections Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Authorizes material scope changes to increase the share of Proposition 1 dollars that can be spent on transit capital projects intended to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126952December 1, 2023
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Proposition 1 as approved by Seattle voters in the 2020 general election; authorizing material scope changes to increase the share of Proposition 1 dollars that can be spent on transit capital projects intended to maximize operating efficiency of transit service purchased with Proposition 1 revenues.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $16,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Separating and amending taxicab and for-hire vehicle industry regulations.CB 120653 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Separating and amending taxicab and for-hire vehicle industry regulations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126977December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxicabs and for-hire vehicles; separating and amending taxicab and for-hire vehicle industry regulations; adding a new Chapter 6.311 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 11.14.235 and 15.17.005 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $590,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Establishes limits on the maximum personal guaranty that may be included in or as a condition of commercial leases.CB 120643 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes limits on the maximum personal guaranty that may be included in or as a condition of commercial leases.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126982December 28, 2023
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to commercial tenancies; establishing limits on the maximum personal guaranty that may be included in or as a condition of commercial leases; and establishing limits on the value of a commercial lease’s required security deposit and/or letters of credit; and adding a new Chapter 6.104 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 77.CB 120731 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 77.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126975December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 77; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,509,196. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 6 , 2021 through December 10, 2021 and ordering the….CB 120250 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 6 , 2021 through December 10, 2021 and ordering the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126523January 10, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 6 , 2021 through December 10, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,319,413. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 13, 2021 through December 17, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120251 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 13, 2021 through December 17, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126524January 10, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 13, 2021 through December 17, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $63,699,269. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 20 , 2021 through December 24, 2021 and ordering the….CB 120252 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 20 , 2021 through December 24, 2021 and ordering the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126525January 10, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 20 , 2021 through December 24, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,358,417. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 27, 2021 through December 31, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120254 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 27, 2021 through December 31, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126527January 20, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 27, 2021 through December 31, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $80,023,138. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 3, 2022 through January 7, 2022 and ordering the payment….CB 120257 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 3, 2022 through January 7, 2022 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126526January 24, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 3, 2022 through January 7, 2022 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,784,197. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 10, 2022 through January 14, 2022 and ordering the payment….CB 120261 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 10, 2022 through January 14, 2022 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126528February 1, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 10, 2022 through January 14, 2022 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $55,212,519. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 17, 2022 through January 21, 2022 and ordering the payment….CB 120262 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 17, 2022 through January 21, 2022 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126532February 3, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 17, 2022 through January 21, 2022 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $52,439,579. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Second extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113 for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National….CB 120253 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Second extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113 for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126536February 18, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; second extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113 for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to obtain flood insurance through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Program; and amending Section 25.06.110 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 24, 2022 through January 28, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.CB 120263 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 24, 2022 through January 28, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126533February 18, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 24, 2022 through January 28, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $81,993,198. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 31, 2022 through February 4, 2022 and ordering the payment….CB 120269 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 31, 2022 through February 4, 2022 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126535February 18, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 31, 2022 through February 4, 2022 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $101,258,968. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis.CB 120267 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126538March 1, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 crisis; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; accepting funding from non-City sources; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the 2022 Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,344,457. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the intention of the City Council to hold a public hearing relating to changing the assessment rate for the Seattle Tourism….Res 32043 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTourism & Workforce Development Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the intention of the City Council to hold a public hearing relating to changing the assessment rate for the Seattle Tourism….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 1, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Tourism & Workforce Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring the intention of the City Council to hold a public hearing relating to changing the assessment rate for the Seattle Tourism Improvement Area.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $837,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 7, 2022 through February 11, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.CB 120274 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 7, 2022 through February 11, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126537March 1, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 7, 2022 through February 11, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,148,590. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Delaying the effective date of the heating oil tax on heating oil service providers under Chapter 5.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120270 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Delaying the effective date of the heating oil tax on heating oil service providers under Chapter 5.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126541March 3, 2022
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; delaying the effective date of the heating oil tax on heating oil service providers under Chapter 5.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and delaying the date of the Office of Sustainability and Environment’s first annual heating oil tax program status report.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,218,253. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 14, 2022 through February 18, 2022 and ordering the payment….CB 120276 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 14, 2022 through February 18, 2022 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126543March 3, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 14, 2022 through February 18, 2022 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $63,722,455. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 21, 2022 through February 25, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.CB 120279 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 21, 2022 through February 25, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126545March 15, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 21, 2022 through February 25, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $60,088,330. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 28, 2022 through March 4, 2022 and ordering the payment….CB 120283 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 28, 2022 through March 4, 2022 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126546March 24, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 28, 2022 through March 4, 2022 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $69,097,287. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 7, 2022 through March 11, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.CB 120285 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 7, 2022 through March 11, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126550March 24, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 7, 2022 through March 11, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $34,241,686. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the assessment rate.CB 120273 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTourism & Workforce Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies the assessment rate.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126552March 31, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Tourism & Workforce Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Tourism Improvement Area; modifying the assessment rate; and amending Ordinance 123714.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $837,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.CB 120280 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126556April 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2022 Budget; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels; adding provisos; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,080,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 14, 2022 through March 18, 2022 and ordering the payment….CB 120288 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 14, 2022 through March 18, 2022 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126553April 5, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 14, 2022 through March 18, 2022 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $60,302,135. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 21, 2022 through March 25, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.CB 120293 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 21, 2022 through March 25, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126557April 8, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 21, 2022 through March 25, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,729,889. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising water rates and charges for certain customers.CB 120291 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising water rates and charges for certain customers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126563April 19, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to rates and charges for water services of Seattle Public Utilities; revising water rates and charges for certain customers; and amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 21.04.440.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 28, 2022 through April 1, 2022 and ordering the payment….CB 120299 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 28, 2022 through April 1, 2022 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126560April 19, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 28, 2022 through April 1, 2022 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $118,827,403. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 4, 2022 through April 8, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.CB 120306 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 4, 2022 through April 8, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126564May 2, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 4, 2022 through April 8, 2022 and ordering payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $24,983,460. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….CB 120303 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126572May 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from the United States Department of Transportation and other non-City sources; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations for the Seattle Department of Transportation; and revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2022-2027 CIP.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $39,688,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.CB 120318 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126588May 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Executive Department; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; changing appropriations and creating new positions in the Office of Housing; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $208,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts.CB 120327 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126583May 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson, Alex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light and Seattle Public Utilities Departments; temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts; superseding several sections under Title 21 that authorize and require the collection of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $8,705,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending terms and conditions pertaining to the emergency bill assistance program and temporarily expanding access to assistance to certain eligible households for….CB 120328 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityPublic Health Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending terms and conditions pertaining to the emergency bill assistance program and temporarily expanding access to assistance to certain eligible households for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126584May 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson, Alex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityPublic Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending terms and conditions pertaining to the emergency bill assistance program and temporarily expanding access to assistance to certain eligible households for a limited time in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) emergency; and amending Section 21.49.042 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,800,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily extending increased assistance related to COVID-induced customer delinquencies.CB 120329 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily extending increased assistance related to COVID-induced customer delinquencies.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126585May 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson, Alex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities’ Emergency Assistance Program; temporarily extending increased assistance related to COVID-induced customer delinquencies; and amending Section 21.76.065 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Advancing certain objectives of the Treaty between the United States of America and Canada relating to the Skagit River and Ross Lake….CB 120349 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Advancing certain objectives of the Treaty between the United States of America and Canada relating to the Skagit River and Ross Lake….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126614July 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; advancing certain objectives of the Treaty between the United States of America and Canada relating to the Skagit River and Ross Lake, and the Seven Mile Reservoir on the Pend Oreille River; authorizing the City Light Department to accept grant funds from the State of Washington Department of Commerce and execute the related agreement for and on behalf of The City of Seattle; authorizing the City Light Department to execute an agreement with the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission to convey the grant funds received from the State of Washington Department of Commerce and certain City Light funds in contribution towards the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission’s payment for the mining company’s surrender of mineral and related rights; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $24,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into an amended Water Quality Combined Financial Assistance Agreement with the State….CB 120354 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into an amended Water Quality Combined Financial Assistance Agreement with the State….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126621July 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into an amended Water Quality Combined Financial Assistance Agreement with the State of Washington Department of Ecology to partially finance costs related to the construction of the Ship Canal Water Quality Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $570,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….CB 120358 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126622July 19, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from the United States Department of Transportation and other non-City sources; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations for the Seattle Department of Transportation; and revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2022-2027 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $103,458,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests that a special election be held concurrent with the November 8, 2022 general election for submission to the qualified electors of….CB 120369 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originElections Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests that a special election be held concurrent with the November 8, 2022 general election for submission to the qualified electors of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126625July 19, 2022
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to ranked choice voting; requesting that a special election be held concurrent with the November 8, 2022 general election for submission to the qualified electors of the City of a proposition to institute ranked choice voting for primary elections for City of Seattle elected offices; adding a new Chapter 2.18 to the Seattle Municipal Code; proposing a ballot title; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizing, in 2022, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 120365 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPoliceParks & RecreationHuman Services & Food Security Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2022, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126635August 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceParks & RecreationHuman Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2022, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Finance and Administrative Services, Department of Neighborhoods, Human Services Department, Seattle Parks and Recreation, Seattle Public Library, Seattle Public Utilities, and the Seattle Police Department to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $63,783,036. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts the gift of a Harvard Government Performance Lab fellow.CB 120367 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts the gift of a Harvard Government Performance Lab fellow.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126636August 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting the gift of a Harvard Government Performance Lab fellow; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $900,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Criminal Code, adding a new Chapter 12A.32 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120375 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates the Seattle Criminal Code, adding a new Chapter 12A.32 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126634August 2, 2022
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Criminal Code, adding a new Chapter 12A.32 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 12A.20.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,022. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to….Res 32062 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to legally bind The City of Seattle with respect to certain projects for which the City seeks grant-funding assistance managed through the Recreation and Conservation Office.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,217,360. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks & Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Annual Action Plan updates to the 2018 - 2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development.CB 120388 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Annual Action Plan updates to the 2018 - 2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126644August 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting Annual Action Plan updates to the 2018 - 2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development; authorizing submission of the Annual Action Plans to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); authorizing acceptance of grant funds from HUD for programs and activities included in the 2022 Annual Action Plans; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, by modifying appropriations to various departments and budget control levels in the 2022 Adopted Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $33,357,136. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Third extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow individuals….CB 120356 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Third extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow individuals….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126651August 17, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; third extension of interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113, and amended by Ordinance 126536, for an additional six months, to allow individuals to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to obtain flood insurance through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Program.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to recruitment and retention of police officers in the Seattle Police Department.CB 120389 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to recruitment and retention of police officers in the Seattle Police Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126654August 18, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
PoliceBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to recruitment and retention of police officers in the Seattle Police Department; modifying a proviso in the 2022 Budget by amending Ordinance 126589; creating positions in the Seattle Department of Human Resources to assist with recruitment to the Seattle Police Department; modifying appropriations in the 2022 Budget by amending Ordinance 126490; authorizing a hiring incentives program in the Seattle Police Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $8,662,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Creates a fund for depositing proceeds of tax-exempt limited tax general obligation bonds in 2023.CB 120396 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a fund for depositing proceeds of tax-exempt limited tax general obligation bonds in 2023.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126653August 18, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Parks & RecreationBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Aquarium Expansion project; creating a fund for depositing proceeds of tax-exempt limited tax general obligation bonds in 2023; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $20,000,000 from the REET I Capital Projects Fund to the 2023 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund for continuing the work on the “Ocean Pavilion” Aquarium expansion; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget, including the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to Seattle Parks and Recreation; and revising project allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2022-2027 CIP; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $54,040,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of the Waterfront. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Authorizes amendments to existing agreements with the Seattle Aquarium Society relating to such financing.CB 120397 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes amendments to existing agreements with the Seattle Aquarium Society relating to such financing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126655August 19, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Aquarium Expansion project; authorizing amendments to existing agreements with the Seattle Aquarium Society relating to such financing; and providing for other related matters.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $34,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of the Waterfront. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Prohibiting false and misleading advertising by limited services pregnancy centers.CB 120399 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Prohibiting false and misleading advertising by limited services pregnancy centers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126660September 14, 2022
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to limited services pregnancy centers; prohibiting false and misleading advertising by limited services pregnancy centers; and adding a new Chapter 7.32 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 8.38 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120393 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 8.38 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126665September 19, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; adding a new Chapter 8.38 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 3.02.125 and 14.20.025 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $21,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Labor Standards. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to execute an amendment to the Yesler Terrace Cooperative Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Seattle….CB 120414 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to execute an amendment to the Yesler Terrace Cooperative Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126667September 21, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the redevelopment of Yesler Terrace by the Housing Authority of The City of Seattle; authorizing the Mayor to execute an amendment to the Yesler Terrace Cooperative Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Seattle that was authorized by Ordinance 123961; authorizing the Director of Housing to implement the Cooperative Agreement as amended; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.CB 120413 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originAffordable HousingClimateBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126675September 23, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingClimateBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; in order to advance the Seattle Green New Deal by funding actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, funding climate-resilient community spaces, and investing in net-zero affordable housing; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Sustainability and Environment. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 3.71 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120412 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adding a new Chapter 3.71 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126678September 26, 2022
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the establishment of the Seattle Film Commission; adding a new Chapter 3.71 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 3.14.600 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2022, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 120450 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2022, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126705December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2022, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Human Services Department, Law Department, Seattle Department of Transportation, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Information and Technology Department, Seattle Police Department, and Seattle Parks and Recreation, Seattle City Light, Seattle Public Library, and Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $75,925,168. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….CB 120445 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126723December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal, in The City of Seattle, to finance the departments and activities of City government and to provide for the general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements for the year beginning on the first day of January 2023; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $602,664,398. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Reducing the per trip tax imposed on transportation network companies operating in Seattle.CB 120442 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Reducing the per trip tax imposed on transportation network companies operating in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126717December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; reducing the per trip tax imposed on transportation network companies operating in Seattle; and amending Section 5.39.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes material scope changes to increase the share of Proposition 1 dollars that can be spent on transit capital projects intended to….CB 120443 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originTransitElections Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes material scope changes to increase the share of Proposition 1 dollars that can be spent on transit capital projects intended to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126718December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Proposition 1 as approved by Seattle voters in the 2020 general election; authorizing material scope changes to increase the share of Proposition 1 dollars that can be spent on transit capital projects intended to maximize operating efficiency of transit service purchased with Proposition 1 revenues.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Section 22.900A.065 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120434 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Section 22.900A.065 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126709December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and technical corrections; adding a new Section 22.900A.065 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 22.900B.010, 22.900B.020, 22.900C.010, 22.900D.010, 22.900D.090, 22.900D.100, 22.900D.110, 22.900D.140, 22.900D.150, 22.900D.160, 22.900E.020, 22.900E.030, 22.900E.040, 22.900E.050, 22.900F.010, and 22.900G.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,825,369. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….CB 120438 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126713December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission, and distribution system of the City; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds to pay part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve fund requirement (if necessary), and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds and authorizing their issuance as either senior lien parity bonds or junior lien bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $450,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance / City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay or reimburse all or part of….CB 120439 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay or reimburse all or part of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126714December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay or reimburse all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and for other City purposes approved by ordinance and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; creating the 2023 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund (Taxable) and the Enhanced Facility Fee Reserve Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $114,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.CB 120440 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126715December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system; authorizing the issuance and sale of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds in one or more series for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of those bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $173,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance/SPU. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system.CB 120441 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126716December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system; authorizing the issuance and sale of water system revenue bonds in one or more series for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds; creating certain accounts of the City relating to the bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $81,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance/SPU. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the execution of a settlement agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation.CB 120467 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originBridges & StructuresParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the execution of a settlement agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126731December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; approving the execution of a settlement agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation; authorizing the transfer of real property rights and the acceptance of the mitigation contribution for the Arboretum North Entry Project required for the SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project, which includes the SR 520 Portage Bay Bridge Roanoke Lid Project; superseding the requirements of Ordinance 118477, which adopted Initiative 42, with respect to the exchange; authorizing the Superintendent or Superintendent’s designee to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding documents; authorizing acceptance of recording of deeds for open space, park, and recreation purposes; creating a fund for depositing monies received from the settlement agreement; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,246,665. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 7, 2020 through December 11, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119983 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 7, 2020 through December 11, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126261January 8, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 7, 2020 through December 11, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $49,552,025. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 14, 2020 through December 18, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119984 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 14, 2020 through December 18, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126262January 8, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 14, 2020 through December 18, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $42,800,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 21, 2020 through December 24, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119985 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 21, 2020 through December 24, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126263January 8, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 21, 2020 through December 24, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $49,956,288. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 28, 2020 through January 1, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 119986 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 28, 2020 through January 1, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126269January 15, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 28, 2020 through January 1, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $85,381,008. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113 for 12 months, to continue to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to….CB 119978 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113 for 12 months, to continue to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126271January 22, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; extending interim regulations established by Ordinance 126113 for 12 months, to continue to rely on updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to allow individuals to continue to obtain flood insurance through FEMA’s Flood Insurance Program; and adopting a work plan for studies needed to develop permanent regulations.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI / LEG. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 4, 2021 through January 8,2021 and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119988 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 4, 2021 through January 8,2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126270January 22, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 4, 2021 through January 8,2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $64,028,526. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 11, 2021 through January 15, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 119991 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 11, 2021 through January 15, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126272January 28, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 11, 2021 through January 15, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $55,090,149. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle Boiler Code, Building Code, Electrical Code, Existing Building Code, Fuel Gas Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, and Residential Code….CB 119992 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Seattle Boiler Code, Building Code, Electrical Code, Existing Building Code, Fuel Gas Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, and Residential Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126278February 9, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s construction codes; adopting the Seattle Boiler Code, Building Code, Electrical Code, Existing Building Code, Fuel Gas Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, and Residential Code by reference, amending certain chapters of those codes, and adopting new chapters for those codes; correcting references to those codes in the Seattle Municipal Code; making technical corrections; adding a new Chapter 22.101 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending the title of Subtitle I of Title 22, Sections 5.73.020, 6.410.070, 6.420.030, 22.170.010, 22.170.050, 22.206.090, 22.206.130, 22.206.160, 22.208.020, 22.502.016, 22.801.030, 25.09.100, 25.09.110, 25.09.120, 25.09.220, and 25.09.520 of the Seattle Municipal Code; repealing Chapters 22.100 and 22.110 and Subtitles IA, III, IV, IVA, and IVB of Title 22 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing ordinances or sections of the following ordinances that adopted or amended older editions of construction codes: 117723, 118654, 119478, 121865, 125156, 125157, 125158, 125160, 125161, 125162, 125337, 125408, 125409, 125410, and 125588.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 18, 2021 through January 22, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 119994 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 18, 2021 through January 22, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126276February 9, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 18, 2021 through January 22, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,180,320. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 25, 2021 through January 29, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 119995 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 25, 2021 through January 29, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126280February 12, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 25, 2021 through January 29, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $86,286,940. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Sets the time and place for hearings on the appeals of certain appellants, Hearing Examiner Case Numbers CWF-0067, CWF-0015, and CWF-0231, from….Res 31990 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets the time and place for hearings on the appeals of certain appellants, Hearing Examiner Case Numbers CWF-0067, CWF-0015, and CWF-0231, from….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 16, 2021
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting the time and place for hearings on the appeals of certain appellants, Hearing Examiner Case Numbers CWF-0067, CWF-0015, and CWF-0231, from the final findings and recommendation report of the Hearing Examiner on the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 1, 2021 through February 5, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 119997 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 1, 2021 through February 5, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126282February 18, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 1, 2021 through February 5, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $101,467,323. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute a Transit Service Funding Agreement with King County Metro Transit in….CB 119998 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitProcurement & ContractsElections Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute a Transit Service Funding Agreement with King County Metro Transit in….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126285February 26, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & ContractsElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute a Transit Service Funding Agreement with King County Metro Transit in order to implement Proposition 1 as approved by Seattle voters in the 2020 General Election; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $238,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 8, 2021 through February 12, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 119999 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 8, 2021 through February 12, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126284February 26, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 8, 2021 through February 12, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $42,196,207. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets the time and place for hearings on the appeals of certain appellants, Hearing Examiner Case Numbers CWF-0089, CWF-0176, CWF-0215, CWF-0318, CWF-0375….Res 31996 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets the time and place for hearings on the appeals of certain appellants, Hearing Examiner Case Numbers CWF-0089, CWF-0176, CWF-0215, CWF-0318, CWF-0375….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 1, 2021
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting the time and place for hearings on the appeals of certain appellants, Hearing Examiner Case Numbers CWF-0089, CWF-0176, CWF-0215, CWF-0318, CWF-0375, CWF-0392, CWF-0410, CWF-0411, CWF-0412, CWF-0413, CWF-0414, CWF-0416, CWF-0418, CWF-0420, CWF-0422, CWF-0423, CWF-0425, CWF-0426, CWF-0427, CWF-0429, CWF-0430, CWF-0431, CWF-0432, CWF-0433, CWF-0434, CWF-0435, CWF-0436, CWF-0437, CWF-0438, CWF-0439, CWF-0440, and CWF-0441, and from the final findings and recommendation report of the Hearing Examiner on the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120009 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126289March 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s 2021 Budget; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation in various budget control levels; and revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2021-2026 CIP; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $81,615,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 15, 2021 through February 19, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120005 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 15, 2021 through February 19, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126286March 12, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 15, 2021 through February 19, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,583,217. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 22, 2021 through February 26, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120010 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 22, 2021 through February 26, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126290March 12, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 22, 2021 through February 26, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $74,489,119. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Sets the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Rick Bohrer, Hearing Examiner Case Number CWF-0295, and from the….Res 31997 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Rick Bohrer, Hearing Examiner Case Number CWF-0295, and from the….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 15, 2021
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Rick Bohrer, Hearing Examiner Case Number CWF-0295, and from the final findings and recommendation report of the Hearing Examiner on the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a spending plan.CB 120011 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a spending plan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126292March 22, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Human Services Department; approving a spending plan; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHuman Services Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Identifying the City Council’s priorities to maximize local use of future federal funding to support COVID-19 relief and recovery efforts.Res 31999 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Identifying the City Council’s priorities to maximize local use of future federal funding to support COVID-19 relief and recovery efforts.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 22, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying the City Council’s priorities to maximize local use of future federal funding to support COVID-19 relief and recovery efforts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $239,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 1, 2021 through March 5, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120012 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 1, 2021 through March 5, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126291March 22, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 1, 2021 through March 5, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $63,566,887. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….CB 120017 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126297March 25, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations for the Seattle Department of Transportation; revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2021-2026 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 8, 2021 through March 12, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120020 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 8, 2021 through March 12, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126299March 25, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 8, 2021 through March 12, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $46,195,840. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 15, 2021 through March 19, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120022 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 15, 2021 through March 19, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126300April 2, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 15, 2021 through March 19, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,357,812. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 22, 2021 through March 26, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120023 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 22, 2021 through March 26, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126304April 9, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 22, 2021 through March 26, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,986,632. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120029 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126308April 16, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and adding provisos; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the payroll expense tax on persons engaging in business in Seattle.CB 120030 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending the payroll expense tax on persons engaging in business in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126309April 16, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; amending the payroll expense tax on persons engaging in business in Seattle; amending Section 5.38.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 5.38.025 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 29, 2021 through April 2, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120031 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 29, 2021 through April 2, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126310April 16, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 29, 2021 through April 2, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $118,620,562. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending terms and conditions pertaining to the emergency bill assistance program and temporarily expanding access to assistance to certain eligible households for….CB 120035 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending terms and conditions pertaining to the emergency bill assistance program and temporarily expanding access to assistance to certain eligible households for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126317April 23, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending terms and conditions pertaining to the emergency bill assistance program and temporarily expanding access to assistance to certain eligible households for a limited time in response to the COVID-19 emergency; and amending Section 21.49.042 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 5, 2021 through April 9, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120047 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 5, 2021 through April 9, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126319April 23, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 5, 2021 through April 9, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,847,844. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 12, 2021 through April 16, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120049 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 12, 2021 through April 16, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126322April 30, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 12, 2021 through April 16, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,720,067. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 19, 2021 through April 23, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120060 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 19, 2021 through April 23, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126324May 7, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 19, 2021 through April 23, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $39,228,972. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle….CB 120062 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitStreets & SidewalksCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126333May 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitStreets & SidewalksCourts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Madison Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) - RapidRide G Line project; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a signal pole and trolley wire easement from Seattle University, a Washington non-profit corporation, situated in a portion of Lots 1 through 6, Mile’s Addition to the City of Seattle, together with a portion of vacated East Spring Street, vacated 11th Avenue, and vacated Madison Court, and an easement for public sidewalk from Casita Grande LLC, a Washington limited liability company, situated in a portion of Block 6, Addition to the City of Seattle, as laid off by D.T. Denny, Guardian of the Estate of J.H. Nagle (Commonly known as Nagle’s Addition to the City of Seattle); designating the easements for transportation purposes, placing the easements under the jurisdiction of SDOT; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $134,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 120042 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126327May 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations within the Transportation Benefit District Fund; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2021-2026 CIP; and lifting a proviso.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $85,550,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….CB 120063 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126334May 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from the United States Department of Transportation for the construction of the Madison BRT-RapidRide G Line project; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $59,900,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Annual Action Plan updates to the 2018 - 2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development.CB 120059 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Annual Action Plan updates to the 2018 - 2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126332May 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting Annual Action Plan updates to the 2018 - 2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development; authorizing submission of the Annual Action Plans to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); authorizing acceptance of grant funds from HUD for programs and activities included in the 2019 and 2021 Annual Action Plans; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, by modifying appropriations to various departments and budget control levels in the 2021 Adopted Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHuman Services Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of a transfer of real property in Southeast Seattle for the purpose of development of affordable housing and other….CB 120058 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of a transfer of real property in Southeast Seattle for the purpose of development of affordable housing and other….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126331May 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Office of Housing (OH); authorizing the acceptance of a transfer of real property in Southeast Seattle for the purpose of development of affordable housing and other related uses, and for general municipal purposes; placing the property under the jurisdiction of OH; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 26, 2021 through April 30, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120064 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 26, 2021 through April 30, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126335May 13, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 26, 2021 through April 30, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $87,779,889. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 3, 2021 through May 7, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120070 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 3, 2021 through May 7, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126340May 20, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 3, 2021 through May 7, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $85,652,725. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 10, 2021 through May 14, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120082 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 10, 2021 through May 14, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126351May 28, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 10, 2021 through May 14, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $53,768,775. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts.CB 120089 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126355June 4, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light and Seattle Public Utilities Departments; temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts; superseding several sections under Title 21 that authorize and require the collection of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000,001. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 17, 2021 through May 21, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120091 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 17, 2021 through May 21, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126354June 4, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 17, 2021 through May 21, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $27,805,006. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 24, 2021 through May 28, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120095 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 24, 2021 through May 28, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126361June 11, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 24, 2021 through May 28, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $84,312,634. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes regulations for the Center Campus Subarea within the sign overlay district for the Seattle Center.CB 120051 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes regulations for the Center Campus Subarea within the sign overlay district for the Seattle Center.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126365June 18, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to public assets, land use, and zoning; establishing regulations for the Center Campus Subarea within the sign overlay district for the Seattle Center; amending Section 23.55.054 of, and adding a new Section 23.55.062 to, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 7.30 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120092 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adding a new Chapter 7.30 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126367June 18, 2021
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the regulation of food delivery businesses and platforms; adding a new Chapter 7.30 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $250. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 31, 2021 through June 4, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120097 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 31, 2021 through June 4, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126363June 18, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 31, 2021 through June 4, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $86,726,458. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifying, approving, and confirming the final assessments and assessment roll of Local Improvement District (LID) No. 6751, for the construction of the….CB 120072 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Modifying, approving, and confirming the final assessments and assessment roll of Local Improvement District (LID) No. 6751, for the construction of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126374June 24, 2021
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE modifying, approving, and confirming the final assessments and assessment roll of Local Improvement District (LID) No. 6751, for the construction of the improvements of LID No. 6751, as provided by Ordinance 125760; levying and assessing a part of the cost and expense thereof against the several lots, tracts, parcels of land, and other property as shown on the final assessment roll; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $379,150,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes labor standards requirements for independent contractors working in Seattle.CB 120069 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes labor standards requirements for independent contractors working in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126373June 24, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to independent contractors in Seattle; establishing labor standards requirements for independent contractors working in Seattle; amending Sections 3.02.125, 3.15.000, and 6.208.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 14.34 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $684,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120096 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originHuman Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126375June 24, 2021
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Human Services Department; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; modifying a proviso imposed by Ordinance 126298; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a Water Quality Combined Financial Assistance Agreement between the State of….CB 120100 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a Water Quality Combined Financial Assistance Agreement between the State of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126376June 25, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a Water Quality Combined Financial Assistance Agreement between the State of Washington Department of Ecology and The City of Seattle, Public Utilities Department, to partially finance costs related to the construction of the Ship Canal Water Quality Project through a Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $570,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77….CB 120102 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originElectricityCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126378June 25, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77 to be effective January 23, 2021 to January 22, 2023; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, by increasing appropriations to Seattle City Light for 2021 payments therefor; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,511,927. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 7, 2021 through June 11, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120104 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 7, 2021 through June 11, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126379June 25, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 7, 2021 through June 11, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,631,441. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Fire Chiefs Association, IAFF, Local 2898….CB 120107 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originFire & EMSCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Fire Chiefs Association, IAFF, Local 2898….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126382July 6, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Fire Chiefs Association, IAFF, Local 2898, to be effective January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021; and amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, by increasing appropriations to the Seattle Fire Department for providing the 2019, 2020, and 2021 payments therefor; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,499,837. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 14, 2021 through June 18, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120110 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 14, 2021 through June 18, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126383July 6, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 14, 2021 through June 18, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $44,192,512. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 21, 2021 through June 25, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120116 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 21, 2021 through June 25, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126385July 9, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 21, 2021 through June 25, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $61,806,918. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 28, 2021 through July 2, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120122 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 28, 2021 through July 2, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126388July 16, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 28, 2021 through July 2, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $91,551,074. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Delaying the effective date of the heating oil tax on heating oil service providers under Chapter 5.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120123 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Delaying the effective date of the heating oil tax on heating oil service providers under Chapter 5.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126391July 27, 2021
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; delaying the effective date of the heating oil tax on heating oil service providers under Chapter 5.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and delaying the date of the Office of Sustainability and Environment’s first annual heating oil tax program status report.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 5, 2021 through July 9, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120125 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 5, 2021 through July 9, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126390July 27, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 5, 2021 through July 9, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,836,147. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Traffic Code.CB 120115 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Traffic Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126399July 30, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Traffic Code; amending Sections 11.14.277, 11.16.121, and 11.76.015 of, and adding a new Section 11.14.276 to, the Seattle Municipal Code to establish on-street paid parking rates for large events that are expected to draw at least 10,000 attendees.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,673,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates an Office of Economic and Revenue Forecasts.CB 120124 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates an Office of Economic and Revenue Forecasts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126395July 30, 2021
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the organization of City government; creating an Office of Economic and Revenue Forecasts; adding a new Chapter 3.44 to, amending Section 3.39.010 and 3.39.035 of, and repealing Section 3.40.060 and Chapter 3.82 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $660,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week July 12, 2021 through July 16, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.CB 120132 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week July 12, 2021 through July 16, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126396July 30, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week July 12, 2021 through July 16, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $41,632,054. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Regarding the impact of Seattle’s Urban Renewal program in displacing Black community members from the Central Area.Res 32015 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Regarding the impact of Seattle’s Urban Renewal program in displacing Black community members from the Central Area.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 9, 2021
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding the impact of Seattle’s Urban Renewal program in displacing Black community members from the Central Area; supporting community demands to fund quality affordable social housing to prevent and reverse displacement; and urging the Office of Housing to fund the affordable housing project proposed by New Hope Community Development Institute.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $11,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the 2021-2026 revision to the Seattle All-Hazards Mitigation Plan.Res 32011 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the 2021-2026 revision to the Seattle All-Hazards Mitigation Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the 2021-2026 revision to the Seattle All-Hazards Mitigation Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $17,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Emergency Management. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes interfund loans up to a total amount of $205,000,000 from multiple City Funds to the General Fund as bridge financing to….CB 120147 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & StructuresTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes interfund loans up to a total amount of $205,000,000 from multiple City Funds to the General Fund as bridge financing to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126407August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the General Fund; authorizing interfund loans up to a total amount of $205,000,000 from multiple City Funds to the General Fund as bridge financing to be repaid from future tax proceeds and other anticipated revenues; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $214,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO Contact/Email:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 19, 2021 through July 23, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120143 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 19, 2021 through July 23, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126402August 12, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 19, 2021 through July 23, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,799,680. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 26, 2021 through July 30, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120152 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 26, 2021 through July 30, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126405August 12, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 26, 2021 through July 30, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $89,712,060. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 2, 2021 through August 6, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120158 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 2, 2021 through August 6, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126418August 18, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 2, 2021 through August 6, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $154,866,159. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2021, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 120111 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originFire & EMSParks & RecreationElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2021, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126428September 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSParks & RecreationElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2021, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Human Services Department, City Light Department, Department of Transportation, Seattle Fire Department, and Seattle Parks and Recreation to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,922,804. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….CB 120159 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126431September 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from the United States Department of Transportation and other non-City sources; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget, including the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations for the Seattle Department of Transportation; revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2021-2026 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $224,420,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 9, 2021 through August 13, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120166 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 9, 2021 through August 13, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126424September 20, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 9, 2021 through August 13, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $52,749,910. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 16, 2021 through August 20, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120167 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 16, 2021 through August 20, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126425September 20, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 16, 2021 through August 20, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $56,495,043. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 23, 2021 through August 27, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120168 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 23, 2021 through August 27, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126426September 20, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 23, 2021 through August 27, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $76,492,007. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 30, 2021 through September 3, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120176 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 30, 2021 through September 3, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126427September 20, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 30, 2021 through September 3, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $118,029,389. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new section to Chapter 21.49 of the Seattle Municipal Code to establish the Renewable Plus Program.CB 120160 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new section to Chapter 21.49 of the Seattle Municipal Code to establish the Renewable Plus Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126437September 27, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricityfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; adding a new section to Chapter 21.49 of the Seattle Municipal Code to establish the Renewable Plus Program; authorizing the City Light Department to implement and execute customer participation agreements; amending Seattle Municipal Code subsection 21.49.130.B to authorize the City Light Department to execute, implement, and administer contracts for the acquisition of eligible renewable energy resources, together with any necessary or convenient transmission, integration, or ancillary services related to such renewable energy.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 6, 2021 through September 10, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120179 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 6, 2021 through September 10, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126435September 27, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 6, 2021 through September 10, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $30,241,978. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating portions of Alaskan Way, Elliot Way, Railroad Way, and Union Street as park boulevards.CB 120163 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating portions of Alaskan Way, Elliot Way, Railroad Way, and Union Street as park boulevards.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126444September 27, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City of Seattle right-of-way along the Central Waterfront; designating portions of Alaskan Way, Elliot Way, Railroad Way, and Union Street as park boulevards; repealing Ordinance 102696; authorizing the transfer of jurisdiction over portions of those right-of-way from the Seattle Department of Transportation to the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation; and amending Appendices I and to II to Ordinance 117569 and Title 15 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and Section 11.16.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT/OWCP. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 13, 2021 through September 17 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120183 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 13, 2021 through September 17 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126447October 4, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 13, 2021 through September 17 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $53,675,755. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 20, 2021 through September 24, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120185 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 20, 2021 through September 24, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126459October 15, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 20, 2021 through September 24, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $45,901,135. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 27, 2021 through October 1, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120187 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 27, 2021 through October 1, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126454October 15, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 27, 2021 through October 1, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $109,489,334. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 4, 2021 through October 8, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120205 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 4, 2021 through October 8, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126460October 20, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 4, 2021 through October 8, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $35,434,393. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 11, 2021 through October 15, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120208 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 11, 2021 through October 15, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126461November 9, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 11, 2021 through October 15, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $52,793,927. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 18, 2021 through October 22, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120209 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 18, 2021 through October 22, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126462November 9, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 18, 2021 through October 22, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $30,575,657. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 25, 2021 through October 29, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120217 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 25, 2021 through October 29, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126463November 12, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 25, 2021 through October 29, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $93,825,742. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 1, 2021 through November 5, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120219 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 1, 2021 through November 5, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126466November 17, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 1, 2021 through November 5, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $54,078,834. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2021, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 120220 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2021, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126469December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2021, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Education and Early Learning, Human Services Department, Department of Transportation, Seattle Public Library, Fire Department, City Attorney’s Office, Seattle Center, Seattle Parks and Recreation, and Police Department to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $64,770,530. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….CB 120203 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126491December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal, in The City of Seattle, to finance the departments and activities of City government and to provide for the general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements for the year beginning on the first day of January 2022; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $587,404,046. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts revised financial policies for the Emergency Fund.Res 32024 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts revised financial policies for the Emergency Fund.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting revised financial policies for the Emergency Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $60,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes interfund loans up to a total of $8,000,000 from the Fleet Capital Fund and $2,000,000 from the Wheelchair Accessible Fund to….CB 120195 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originAccessibility Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes interfund loans up to a total of $8,000,000 from the Fleet Capital Fund and $2,000,000 from the Wheelchair Accessible Fund to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126478December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accessibility
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Finance and Administrative Services Fund; authorizing interfund loans up to a total of $8,000,000 from the Fleet Capital Fund and $2,000,000 from the Wheelchair Accessible Fund to the Finance and Administrative Services Fund for financing of FEMA-eligible COVID-19 response expenses.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and….CB 120190 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126473December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and technical corrections; amending Sections 22.900D.090, 22.900D.100, and 22.900D.150 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $865,994. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Street Use Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120191 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Street Use Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126474December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending the Street Use Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Phone:-. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….CB 120198 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126479December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and for other City purposes approved by ordinance, to provide loans to one or more public development authorities of the City for certain eligible capital purposes, and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; creating the 2022 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund; amending Ordinance 126219; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $127,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….CB 120196 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126481December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission, and distribution system of the City; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds to pay part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve fund requirement (if any), and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds and authorizing their issuance as either senior lien parity bonds or junior lien bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $225,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.CB 120197 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126482December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system; authorizing the issuance and sale of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds in one or more series for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of those bonds; amending certain definitions set forth in Ordinance 125455, the Omnibus Refunding Ordinance; authorizing the issuance of drainage and wastewater system refunding revenue bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $88,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/SPU. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system.CB 120199 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126483December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system; authorizing the issuance and sale of water system revenue bonds in one or more series for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds; creating certain accounts of the City relating to the bonds; amending certain definitions set forth in Ordinance 125714, the Omnibus Refunding Ordinance; authorizing the issuance of water system refunding revenue bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $88,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/SPU. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Increasing the commercial parking tax and amending subsection 5.35.030.B of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120228 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Increasing the commercial parking tax and amending subsection 5.35.030.B of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126488December 2, 2021
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; increasing the commercial parking tax and amending subsection 5.35.030.B of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,400,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126407 to increase the authorization of interfund loans up to a total amount of $275,000,000 from multiple City Funds to….CB 120222 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & StructuresTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126407 to increase the authorization of interfund loans up to a total amount of $275,000,000 from multiple City Funds to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126489December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the General Fund; amending Ordinance 126407 to increase the authorization of interfund loans up to a total amount of $275,000,000 from multiple City Funds to the General Fund as bridge financing to be repaid from future tax proceeds and other anticipated revenues; authorizing additional lending funds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $275,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Email:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes interfund loans up to a total amount of $15,000,000 from multiple City funds as bridge financing to be repaid by the….CB 120223 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & Structures Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes interfund loans up to a total amount of $15,000,000 from multiple City funds as bridge financing to be repaid by the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126487December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Transportation Fund; authorizing interfund loans up to a total amount of $15,000,000 from multiple City funds as bridge financing to be repaid by the proceeds of a future surplus property sale.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….CB 120224 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126480December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs of certain transportation elements of the City’s capital improvement program and for other City purposes approved by ordinance and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $103,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 8, 2021 through November 12, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120229 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 8, 2021 through November 12, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126467December 2, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 8, 2021 through November 12, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,548,371. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 15, 2021 through November 19, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120234 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 15, 2021 through November 19, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126496December 10, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 15, 2021 through November 19, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $38,443,707. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 22, 2021 through November 26, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120240 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 22, 2021 through November 26, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126498December 10, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 22, 2021 through November 26, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $52,260,059. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with the Woodland Park Zoological Society for operation and management….CB 120164 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with the Woodland Park Zoological Society for operation and management….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126511December 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with the Woodland Park Zoological Society for operation and management of the Woodland Park Zoo.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $16,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates an Indigenous Advisory Council for tribal and urban Indian engagement.CB 120188 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates an Indigenous Advisory Council for tribal and urban Indian engagement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126512December 15, 2021
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE creating an Indigenous Advisory Council for tribal and urban Indian engagement; adding a new Chapter 3.75 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 3.35.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a substantial amendment to The City of Seattle 2021 Annual Action Plan of the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community….CB 120238 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a substantial amendment to The City of Seattle 2021 Annual Action Plan of the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126506December 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing; adopting a substantial amendment to The City of Seattle 2021 Annual Action Plan of the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); authorizing acceptance of grant funds from HUD for programs and activities included in the Annual Action Plan; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the City Council’s and the Mayor’s intent to consider strategies to ensure that all unreinforced masonry buildings in Seattle are seismically….Res 32033 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Declares the City Council’s and the Mayor’s intent to consider strategies to ensure that all unreinforced masonry buildings in Seattle are seismically….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 15, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring the City Council’s and the Mayor’s intent to consider strategies to ensure that all unreinforced masonry buildings in Seattle are seismically retrofitted.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,300,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Including protections against discrimination based on citizenship and immigration status.CB 120241 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originCivil Rights Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Including protections against discrimination based on citizenship and immigration status.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126514December 15, 2021
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to human rights; including protections against discrimination based on citizenship and immigration status; adding a definition of race for certain purposes; and amending Sections 3.14.910, 3.14.931, 3.110.260, 4.80.020, 6.02.270, 6.202.230, 14.04.020, 14.04.030, 14.04.040, 14.04.050, 14.06.020, 14.06.030, 14.08.015, 14.08.020, 14.08.045, 14.08.070, 14.08.190, 14.10.010, 14.10.020, and 18.12.280 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a memorandum of understanding between The City of Seattle and certain City unions.CB 120242 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a memorandum of understanding between The City of Seattle and certain City unions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126516December 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a memorandum of understanding between The City of Seattle and certain City unions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $821,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides salary increases for 2022 for certain non-represented City job titles.CB 120243 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides salary increases for 2022 for certain non-represented City job titles.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126503December 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; providing salary increases for 2022 for certain non-represented City job titles; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $821,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 29, 2021 through December 3, 2021 and ordering the payment….CB 120249 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 29, 2021 through December 3, 2021 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126515December 15, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 29, 2021 through December 3, 2021 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $108,197,075. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding data reporting responsibilities to the City Attorney’s Office.CB 120247 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adding data reporting responsibilities to the City Attorney’s Office.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126520December 27, 2021
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the organization of City government; adding data reporting responsibilities to the City Attorney’s Office; and adding a new Chapter 3.46 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides that transitional encampments for homeless individuals are allowed on any property owned or controlled by a religious organization without approval of….CB 119656 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originHomelessness ServicesZoningPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Provides that transitional encampments for homeless individuals are allowed on any property owned or controlled by a religious organization without approval of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126042February 28, 2020
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Homelessness ServicesZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; providing that transitional encampments for homeless individuals are allowed on any property owned or controlled by a religious organization without approval of a permit under the Seattle Land Use Code, to permit transitional encampments for homeless individuals as an interim use on all publicly owned or private property within the City of Seattle, and providing for renewal of temporary use permits for transitional encampments as a Type I decision of the Director of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections; amending Sections 23.40.002, 23.42.054, 23.42.056, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.76.032, and 23.84A.038 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Ordinance 124747.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,800,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes execution of a Funding and Cooperative Agreement for Northgate Station Area Access Improvements between Sound Transit and The City of Seattle.CB 119741 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a Funding and Cooperative Agreement for Northgate Station Area Access Improvements between Sound Transit and The City of Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126046February 28, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (“Sound Transit”); authorizing execution of a Funding and Cooperative Agreement for Northgate Station Area Access Improvements between Sound Transit and The City of Seattle; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
In support of the bid by The City of Seattle to host the National League of Cities 2025 City Summit conference.Res 31939 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

In support of the bid by The City of Seattle to host the National League of Cities 2025 City Summit conference.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 30, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of the bid by The City of Seattle to host the National League of Cities 2025 City Summit conference.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,887,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 23, 2020 through March 27, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119767 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 23, 2020 through March 27, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126064April 17, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 23, 2020 through March 27, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $66,821,834. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 30, 2020 through April 3, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119775 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 30, 2020 through April 3, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126065April 17, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 30, 2020 through April 3, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $81,218,037. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 6, 2020 through April 10, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119777 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 6, 2020 through April 10, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126069April 29, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 6, 2020 through April 10, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,371,748. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 13, 2020 through April 17, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119778 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 13, 2020 through April 17, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126071April 29, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 13, 2020 through April 17, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,552,424. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a fund for depositing proceeds of Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds in 2021.CB 119782 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originBridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a fund for depositing proceeds of Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds in 2021.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126077May 6, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of fire facilities; creating a fund for depositing proceeds of Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds in 2021; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $8,200,000 from the Construction and Inspections Fund to the 2021 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund for bridge financing of the Fire Station 31 Replacement Project; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program, changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 20, 2020 through April 24, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119786 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 20, 2020 through April 24, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126073May 6, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 20, 2020 through April 24, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $31,278,068. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts The City of Seattle 2020 Annual Action Plan to the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its….CB 119785 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts The City of Seattle 2020 Annual Action Plan to the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126082May 15, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting The City of Seattle 2020 Annual Action Plan to the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; authorizing acceptance of grant funds from that department for programs and activities included in the Annual Action Plan; amending Ordinance 126000 which adopted the 2020 Budget, by modifying appropriations to various departments and budget control levels in the 2020 Adopted Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,800,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHuman Services Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 27, 2020 through May 1, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119789 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 27, 2020 through May 1, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126079May 15, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of April 27, 2020 through May 1, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $156,449,151. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 4, 2020 through May 8, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119792 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 4, 2020 through May 8, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126083May 26, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 4, 2020 through May 8, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,482,097. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 11, 2020 through May 15, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119798 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 11, 2020 through May 15, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126086June 1, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 11, 2020 through May 15, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $49,222,411. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 18, 2020 through May 22, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119800 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 18, 2020 through May 22, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126089June 12, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 18, 2020 through May 22, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $34,485,897. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 25, 2020 through May 29, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119801 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 25, 2020 through May 29, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126092June 12, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of May 25, 2020 through May 29, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $68,824,098. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 1, 2020 through June 5, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119806 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 1, 2020 through June 5, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126097June 26, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 1, 2020 through June 5, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $58,651,149. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 8, 2020 through June 12, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119809 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 8, 2020 through June 12, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126100June 26, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 8, 2020 through June 12, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $55,169,148. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a substantial amendment to The City of Seattle 2019 Annual Action Plan Amendment to the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and….CB 119814 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a substantial amendment to The City of Seattle 2019 Annual Action Plan Amendment to the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126105July 10, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting a substantial amendment to The City of Seattle 2019 Annual Action Plan Amendment to the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; authorizing acceptance of grant funds from that department for programs and activities included in the Annual Action Plan; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $8,900,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHuman Services Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 15, 2020 through June 19, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119813 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 15, 2020 through June 19, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126103July 10, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 15, 2020 through June 19, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $25,129,302. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
In support of fair, direct, and federal emergency support to reopen and rebuild local American economies.Res 31949 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

In support of fair, direct, and federal emergency support to reopen and rebuild local American economies.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 10, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of fair, direct, and federal emergency support to reopen and rebuild local American economies; and stating that a fully funded Seattle is essential to economic recovery.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $300,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 22, 2020 through June 26, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119817 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 22, 2020 through June 26, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126104July 10, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 22, 2020 through June 26, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $89,421,400. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to….Res 31950 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 20, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to legally bind The City of Seattle with respect to certain projects for which the City seeks grant funding assistance managed through the Recreation and Conservation Office.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,342,998. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 29, 2020 through July 3, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119830 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 29, 2020 through July 3, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126110July 20, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of June 29, 2020 through July 3, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $52,601,628. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes spending details by year and program area for the spending plan adopted by the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119811 that….Res 31957 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes spending details by year and program area for the spending plan adopted by the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119811 that….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 20, 2020
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing spending details by year and program area for the spending plan adopted by the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119811 that established the authorized uses of the proceeds generated from the payroll expense tax authorized by the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119810.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $214,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Adopts interim regulations consistent with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulations.CB 119832 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts interim regulations consistent with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126113July 24, 2020
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to floodplains; adopting interim regulations consistent with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulations; adopting updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to allow individuals to continue to obtain flood insurance through FEMA’s Flood Insurance Program; and amending Chapter 25.06 and Section 25.09.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 6, 2020 through July 10, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119834 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 6, 2020 through July 10, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126114July 24, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 6, 2020 through July 10, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $53,235,423. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 13, 2020 through July 17, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119836 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 13, 2020 through July 17, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126117August 5, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 13, 2020 through July 17, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $49,536,132. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 20, 2020 through July 24, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119837 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 20, 2020 through July 24, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126118August 5, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 20, 2020 through July 24, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $51,607,787. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes an exception to the level of General Fund support to Seattle Parks and Recreation due to exigent economic circumstances, by a….Res 31951 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an exception to the level of General Fund support to Seattle Parks and Recreation due to exigent economic circumstances, by a….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 10, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION authorizing an exception to the level of General Fund support to Seattle Parks and Recreation due to exigent economic circumstances, by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $101,604,265. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119812 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126119August 12, 2020
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; making appropriations from the Emergency Fund for public assistance during the COVID-19 civil emergency; making an appropriation from the General Fund for public assistance during the civil emergency; and making appropriations from the Revenue Stabilization Fund for public assistance during the civil emergency; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $86,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 27, 2020 through July 31, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119843 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 27, 2020 through July 31, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126120August 14, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 27, 2020 through July 31, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $66,339,841. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Delegating temporary authority to the City Clerk to set the time and place for a hearing on any appeals from the report….Res 31965 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Delegating temporary authority to the City Clerk to set the time and place for a hearing on any appeals from the report….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2020
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION delegating temporary authority to the City Clerk to set the time and place for a hearing on any appeals from the report, findings, recommendation, and decision of the Hearing Examiner on the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751, and directing that the City Clerk provide any required notice of the hearing in the manner required by law.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Suspending the Minimal Annual General Fund Appropriation to the Seattle Department of Transportation budget as required in Ordinance 124796, the Levy to….CB 119822 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Suspending the Minimal Annual General Fund Appropriation to the Seattle Department of Transportation budget as required in Ordinance 124796, the Levy to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126128August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2020 Budget; suspending the Minimal Annual General Fund Appropriation to the Seattle Department of Transportation budget as required in Ordinance 124796, the Levy to Move Seattle; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $40,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119860 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126149August 23, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; and amending the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119812, relating to appropriations from the Emergency Fund for public assistance during the COVID-19 civil emergency; and making appropriations from the Revenue Stabilization Fund for public assistance during the civil emergency; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $83,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119861 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPoliceBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126150August 23, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; creating new budget summary levels to disaggregate Seattle Police Department precincts from the Patrol Operations Budget Summary Level.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $136,889,051. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 3, 2020 through August 7, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119864 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 3, 2020 through August 7, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126147August 26, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 3, 2020 through August 7, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $81,833,969. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125706 and the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119865 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125706 and the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126159September 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen, Dan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending Ordinance 125706 and the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,600,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a fund for depositing proceeds of taxable limited tax general obligation bonds in 2021.CB 119858 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a fund for depositing proceeds of taxable limited tax general obligation bonds in 2021.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126161September 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the West Seattle Bridge Immediate Response project; creating a fund for depositing proceeds of taxable limited tax general obligation bonds in 2021; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $50,000,000 from the Construction and Inspections Fund and $20,000,000 from the REET II Capital Projects Fund to the 2021 LTGO Taxable Bond Fund for early phases of work on the bridge repair and replacement project; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation; and revising project allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2020-2025 CIP.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $225,711,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates use of City right-of-way by free-floating scooters.CB 119868 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates use of City right-of-way by free-floating scooters.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126162September 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to use of City right-of-way by free-floating scooters; amending Section 15.17.005 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adopting a Free-Floating Scooter Share Program Fee Schedule; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,309,216. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 10, 2020 through August 14, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119872 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 10, 2020 through August 14, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126154September 11, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 10, 2020 through August 14, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $32,609,797. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 17, 2020 through August 21, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119873 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 17, 2020 through August 21, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126155September 11, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 17, 2020 through August 21, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,041,064. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 24, 2020 through August 28, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119874 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 24, 2020 through August 28, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126156September 11, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 24, 2020 through August 28, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $63,525,286. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 31, 2020 through September 4, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119880 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 31, 2020 through September 4, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126164September 21, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 31, 2020 through September 4, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $116,429,028. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Lou Bond from the findings and recommendation report of the….Res 31969 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Lou Bond from the findings and recommendation report of the….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 21, 2020
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Lou Bond from the findings and recommendation report of the Hearing Examiner on the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751, and directing that the City Clerk provide any required notice of the hearing in the manner required by law.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the loan of funds from the Construction and Inspections Fund to the General Fund.CB 119863 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds from the Construction and Inspections Fund to the General Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126152September 22, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the loan of funds from the Construction and Inspections Fund to the General Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $118,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Chief Technology Officer of the Seattle Information Technology Department to execute for and on behalf of The City of Seattle….CB 119879 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Chief Technology Officer of the Seattle Information Technology Department to execute for and on behalf of The City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126174September 25, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the operation and maintenance of a new regional 800 MHz emergency public safety radio communication system; authorizing the Chief Technology Officer of the Seattle Information Technology Department to execute for and on behalf of The City of Seattle an interlocal agreement between The City of Seattle, King County, and the Cities of Auburn, Bellevue, Federal Way, Issaquah, Kent, Kirkland, Mercer Island, Redmond, Renton, and Tukwila for the purpose of creating a non-profit corporation, as provided under RCW 39.34.030, to own, operate, and maintain the regional emergency radio communication system that is being installed and developed under a separate interlocal agreement authorized by Ordinance 124685.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $283,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Fire Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119883 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126175September 25, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); revising project allocations for the Madison BRT - RapidRide G Line project and certain other projects in Ordinance 126000 into the 2020-2025 Adopted CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $133,696,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 7, 2020 through September 11, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119892 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 7, 2020 through September 11, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126169September 25, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 7, 2020 through September 11, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $16,662,638. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Eugene and Leah Burrus, Hearing Examiner Case Number CWF-0022, from….Res 31972 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Eugene and Leah Burrus, Hearing Examiner Case Number CWF-0022, from….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 29, 2020
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Eugene and Leah Burrus, Hearing Examiner Case Number CWF-0022, from the findings and recommendation report of the Hearing Examiner on the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751, and directing that the City Clerk provide any required notice of the hearing in the manner required by law.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts.CB 119896 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126182October 2, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light and Seattle Public Utilities Departments; temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts; superseding several sections under Title 21 that authorize and require the collection of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000,001. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras to reduce traffic congestion and increase safety.CB 119897 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTraffic Safety Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras to reduce traffic congestion and increase safety.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126183October 2, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras to reduce traffic congestion and increase safety; amending Sections 11.31.090 and 11.50.570 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,245,555. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 14, 2020 through September 18, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119901 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 14, 2020 through September 18, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126187October 2, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 14, 2020 through September 18, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $49,769,683. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets the time and place for hearings on the appeals of certain appellants, Hearing Examiner Case Numbers CWF-0228, CWF-0063, CWF-0078, CWF-0137, CWF-0154….Res 31973 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets the time and place for hearings on the appeals of certain appellants, Hearing Examiner Case Numbers CWF-0228, CWF-0063, CWF-0078, CWF-0137, CWF-0154….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 5, 2020
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting the time and place for hearings on the appeals of certain appellants, Hearing Examiner Case Numbers CWF-0228, CWF-0063, CWF-0078, CWF-0137, CWF-0154, CWF-0189, CWF-0230, CWF-0338, CWF-0204, CWF-0259, CWF-0301, CWF-0270, CWF-0206, CWF-0094, CWF-0236, CWF-0375, CWF-0314, CWF-0280, CWF-0265, CWF-0243, CWF-0227, CWF-0427, CWF-0426, CWF-0215, CWF-0439, CWF-0438, CWF-0437, CWF-0436, CWF-0435, CWF-0434, CWF-0433, CWF-0432, CWF-0422, CWF-0431, CWF-0430, CWF-0171, CWF-0421, CWF-0429, CWF-0423, CWF-0420, CWF-0412, CWF-0418, CWF-0097, CWF-0417, CWF-0416, CWF-0415, CWF-0414, CWF-0413, CWF-0318, CWF-0411, CWF-0410, CWF-0176, CWF-0252, CWF-0133, CWF-0134, CWF-0136, CWF-0168, CWF-0353, CWF-0283, CWF-0425, CWF-0441, and CWF-0440, from the findings and recommendation report of the Hearing Examiner on the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751, and directing that the City Clerk provide any required notice of the hearings in the manner required by law.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants authority for the Department to offer incentive programs in the electrification of transportation for its customers, including the promotion of electric….CB 119895 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants authority for the Department to offer incentive programs in the electrification of transportation for its customers, including the promotion of electric….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126196October 8, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; granting authority for the Department to offer incentive programs in the electrification of transportation for its customers, including the promotion of electric vehicle adoption and advertising programs to promote the utility’s services, incentives, or rebates; and adding a new Chapter 21.53 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes minimum labor and compensation standards for transportation network company drivers.CB 119876 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes minimum labor and compensation standards for transportation network company drivers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126189October 8, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to transportation network company driver labor standards; establishing minimum labor and compensation standards for transportation network company drivers; establishing provision of or reimbursement for personal protective equipment to transportation network company drivers during the civil emergency declared on March 3, 2020; establishing notice, posting, and data requirements for transportation network companies; prescribing remedies and enforcement procedures; amending Section 3.15.000 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending the title of Chapter 14.31 and Sections 6.208.020 and 14.31.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 14.33 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $505,546. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Labor Standards. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 21, 2020 through September 25, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119904 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 21, 2020 through September 25, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126190October 8, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 21, 2020 through September 25, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $37,032,281. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 28, 2020 through October 2, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119908 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 28, 2020 through October 2, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126197October 16, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 28, 2020 through October 2, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $85,997,473. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Robert Wexler, Hearing Examiner Case Number CWF-0149, from the findings….Res 31974 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Robert Wexler, Hearing Examiner Case Number CWF-0149, from the findings….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 21, 2020
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting the time and place for a hearing on the appeal of Robert Wexler, Hearing Examiner Case Number CWF-0149, from the findings and recommendation report of the Hearing Examiner on the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751, and directing that the City Clerk provide any required notice of the hearing in the manner required by law.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Park District.CB 119875 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Park District.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126199October 30, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Park District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $54,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 5, 2020 through October 9, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119941 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 5, 2020 through October 9, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126198October 30, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 5, 2020 through October 9, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,993,780. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 12, 2020 through October 16, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119943 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 12, 2020 through October 16, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126200October 30, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 12, 2020 through October 16, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,546,678. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 19, 2020 through October 23, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119944 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 19, 2020 through October 23, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126202November 10, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 19, 2020 through October 23, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $47,397,780. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Remanding certain properties to the City Appraiser for further analysis concerning the valuation of the properties consistent with recommendations of the Initial….Res 31979 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Remanding certain properties to the City Appraiser for further analysis concerning the valuation of the properties consistent with recommendations of the Initial….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 10, 2020
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Findings and Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner for The City of Seattle on the Final Assessment Roll for the Waterfront Local Improvement District (LID #6751); remanding certain properties to the City Appraiser for further analysis concerning the valuation of the properties consistent with recommendations of the Initial Report; returning jurisdiction to the Hearing Examiner for final recommendations on the remanded properties; directing the Hearing Examiner to file final findings, recommendations, or decisions on the Final Assessment Roll for the Waterfront LID (“Final Report”) with the City Clerk; providing for appeal from the Final Report; and postponing hearings on appeals from the Initial Report previously scheduled via Resolutions 31969, 31972, 31973, and 31974.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 26, 2020 through October 30, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119946 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 26, 2020 through October 30, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126205November 13, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 26, 2020 through October 30, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $83,819,469. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 2, 2020 through November 6, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119948 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 2, 2020 through November 6, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126207November 20, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 2, 2020 through November 6, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $65,230,903. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an exception to the level of General Fund support to Seattle Parks and Recreation by a 3/4 vote of the City….Res 31975 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an exception to the level of General Fund support to Seattle Parks and Recreation by a 3/4 vote of the City….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 23, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION authorizing an exception to the level of General Fund support to Seattle Parks and Recreation by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $103,676,509. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Establishes the 2021-2022 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.CB 119914 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the 2021-2022 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126214December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; establishing the 2021-2022 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services; and superseding previous park and recreation fee schedules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $40,289,974. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the Seattle Center Fee Range Schedule and the general terms and conditions for events at Seattle Center from which the Seattle….CB 119917 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies the Seattle Center Fee Range Schedule and the general terms and conditions for events at Seattle Center from which the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126217December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to facilities at Seattle Center; modifying the Seattle Center Fee Range Schedule and the general terms and conditions for events at Seattle Center from which the Seattle Center Director is authorized to set fees and the general terms, conditions, and guidelines for use of Seattle Center facilities and property; amending Section 17.16.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to provide for adoption of future general terms and conditions for events at Seattle Center by ordinance; amending SMC 17.16.020 to increase the term for event-related service agreements; amending SMC 17.16.030 to grant temporary authority to modify food and beverage service leases due to the impacts of COVID-19 and correct the reporting requirements for in-kind contributions; and repealing SMC Chapter 17.20 providing for use and operation of Veterans Hall, which facility was demolished as part of the renovation of the adjacent Marion Oliver McCaw Hall.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,597,558. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….CB 119939 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126238December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal, in The City of Seattle, to finance the departments and activities of City government and to provide for the general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements for the year beginning on the first day of January 2021; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; and, by a vote of a majority plus one of the Seattle City Council, finding a substantial need to use, and providing for the use of, 101% as the regular property tax limit factor.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $576,921,347. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119911 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126211December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; repealing Ordinance 126149; making appropriations from the Emergency Fund and General Fund for public assistance during the COVID-19 civil emergency; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $43,102,567. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO/LEG. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….CB 119919 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126219December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and for other City purposes approved by ordinance, to provide one or more loans to the Pike Place Market Preservation and Development Authority for the financing of certain improvements, and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; creating the 2021 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund (Taxable); and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $212,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Phone: CBO Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125454, as amended by Ordinance 125712, to increase the authorized principal amount of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds to be….CB 119922 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125454, as amended by Ordinance 125712, to increase the authorized principal amount of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds to be….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126222December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; amending Ordinance 125454, as amended by Ordinance 125712, to increase the authorized principal amount of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds to be issued for the purposes of paying all or part of the cost of carrying out the system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system; extending the initial authorization date of those bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/SPU. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125713 to increase the authorized principal amount of municipal water system revenue bonds to be issued for the purposes of….CB 119925 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125713 to increase the authorized principal amount of municipal water system revenue bonds to be issued for the purposes of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126225December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; amending Ordinance 125713 to increase the authorized principal amount of municipal water system revenue bonds to be issued for the purposes of paying all or part of the cost of carrying out the system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system; extending the initial authorization date for those bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $280,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/SPU. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….CB 119921 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126221December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission, and distribution system of the City; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds to pay part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve fund requirement (if any), and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds and authorizing their issuance as either senior lien parity bonds or junior lien bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125717, which authorized an interfund loan.CB 119918 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125717, which authorized an interfund loan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126218December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of Seattle Center’s operations; amending Ordinance 125717, which authorized an interfund loan; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $18,000,000 from the REET II Capital Projects Fund to the Seattle Center Fund to support the operations of Seattle Center during the COVID-19 crisis; and providing for the repayment thereof.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
All by a ¾ vote of the City Council.CB 119930 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

All by a ¾ vote of the City Council.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126230December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to adjusting the nine-year Move Seattle Levy appropriation amounts for Levy core categories established by Ordinance 124796, the Levy to Move Seattle; all by a ¾ vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $930,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact / Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates an Office of Emergency Management.CB 119933 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originEmergency Management Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates an Office of Emergency Management.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126232December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Emergency Management
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the organization of City government; creating an Office of Emergency Management; repealing Sections 10.02.045 and 10.020.047 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding Sections 3.15.040 and 3.15.042 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Ordinance 118617; and adopting revised Emergency Management Fund - General Trust Fund Policies.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,483,750. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $25,000,000 from the Information Technology Fund to the Transportation Fund to support essential….CB 119947 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $25,000,000 from the Information Technology Fund to the Transportation Fund to support essential….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126227December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Seattle Department of Transportation; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $25,000,000 from the Information Technology Fund to the Transportation Fund to support essential transportation programs.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $25,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 9, 2020 through November 13, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119952 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 9, 2020 through November 13, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126208December 1, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 9, 2020 through November 13, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,620,060. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute the Third Amendment to the Facility Use and Occupancy Agreement between The City of Seattle….CB 119964 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute the Third Amendment to the Facility Use and Occupancy Agreement between The City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126243December 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute the Third Amendment to the Facility Use and Occupancy Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Repertory Theater.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 16, 2020 through November 20, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119957 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 16, 2020 through November 20, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126240December 11, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 16, 2020 through November 20, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $123,760,746. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 23, 2020 through November 27, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119965 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 23, 2020 through November 27, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126242December 11, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 23, 2020 through November 27, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $77,145,543. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2020, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119971 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2020, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126256December 16, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2020, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the Mayor or Mayor’s designee to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,299,011. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts.CB 119969 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126254December 16, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light and Seattle Public Utilities Departments; temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts; superseding several sections under Title 21 that authorize and require the collection of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000,001. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 30, 2020 through December 4, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119979 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 30, 2020 through December 4, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126252December 16, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 30, 2020 through December 4, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $76,271,266. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to execute an agreement with the State of Washington to set forth roles and responsibilities and establish a method….CB 119416 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to execute an agreement with the State of Washington to set forth roles and responsibilities and establish a method….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125754January 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the State Route 520 Project; authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with the State of Washington to set forth roles and responsibilities and establish a method for reimbursing costs, where applicable, to operate and maintain the infrastructure constructed as part of the State of Washington’s State Route 520 Project.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,640,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes Local Improvement District No. 6751 (“Waterfront LID”) and ordering the carrying out of the proposed LID Improvements, as a component of….CB 119447 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes Local Improvement District No. 6751 (“Waterfront LID”) and ordering the carrying out of the proposed LID Improvements, as a component of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125760January 29, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Waterfront Improvement Program and the LID Improvements identified herein; establishing Local Improvement District No. 6751 (“Waterfront LID”) and ordering the carrying out of the proposed LID Improvements, as a component of the Seattle Central Waterfront Improvement Program in accordance with Resolution 31812; providing that payment for the LID Improvements be made in part by special assessments upon the property in the Waterfront LID, payable by the mode of “payment by bonds”; creating a local improvement fund; authorizing the issuance of local improvement bonds; and providing for interfund loans and for the issuance and sale of short-term financing instruments, and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts, all by a two-thirds vote of the City Council at a regular meeting.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $712,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT/OWCP/FAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the agreement and authorizing the Director of the Office of the Waterfront and Civic Projects and the Superintendent of the Department….CB 119449 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the agreement and authorizing the Director of the Office of the Waterfront and Civic Projects and the Superintendent of the Department….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125762January 29, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a protest waiver agreement between and among the City, the Waterfront Park Conservancy, and certain property owners affected by the proposed Waterfront Local Improvement District; approving the agreement and authorizing the Director of the Office of the Waterfront and Civic Projects and the Superintendent of the Department of Parks and Recreation to execute the agreement and implement its terms.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates an incentive program for hiring police officers.CB 119468 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolice Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates an incentive program for hiring police officers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125784March 12, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; creating an incentive program for hiring police officers; and repealing obsolete Sections 4.20.530, 4.20.540, and 4.20.550 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,400,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), as amended by Ordinance 125635, to lift the proviso on 2018 Mobility-Capital Budget Control Level expenditures.CB 119434 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), as amended by Ordinance 125635, to lift the proviso on 2018 Mobility-Capital Budget Control Level expenditures.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125788March 15, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Delridge Multimodal Corridor Project; amending the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), as amended by Ordinance 125635, to lift the proviso on 2018 Mobility-Capital Budget Control Level expenditures.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedTransportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Utilizing the resources provided by the taxpayers within the Development Category Inflation Adjustment and the Neighborhood Parks and Playgrounds subcategory.CB 119460 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationNeighborhoods Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Utilizing the resources provided by the taxpayers within the Development Category Inflation Adjustment and the Neighborhood Parks and Playgrounds subcategory.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125786March 15, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2008 Parks and Green Spaces Levy; utilizing the resources provided by the taxpayers within the Development Category Inflation Adjustment and the Neighborhood Parks and Playgrounds subcategory; increasing appropriations to the Department of Parks and Recreation in the 2019 Adopted Budget; and amending the 2019-2024 Adopted Capital Improvement Program; all by a three-fourths vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising Resolution 31849, which endorsed a budget for The City of Seattle for 2020, by substituting a new Attachment A that corrects….Res 31869 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising Resolution 31849, which endorsed a budget for The City of Seattle for 2020, by substituting a new Attachment A that corrects….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 22, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION revising Resolution 31849, which endorsed a budget for The City of Seattle for 2020, by substituting a new Attachment A that corrects technical omissions and errors.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $33,776,222. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Office of the Waterfront and Civic Projects to execute an agreement with the Washington State Ferry system….CB 119490 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Office of the Waterfront and Civic Projects to execute an agreement with the Washington State Ferry system….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125806April 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Waterfront Improvement Program; authorizing the Director of the Office of the Waterfront and Civic Projects to execute an agreement with the Washington State Ferry system for the construction of facilities to support electrification of ferry vessels at the Colman Ferry Terminal; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation; revising revenue allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2019-2024 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $370,570,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOWCP. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring persons owning or managing a place of public accommodations to activate closed captioning on television receivers.CB 119487 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring persons owning or managing a place of public accommodations to activate closed captioning on television receivers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125805April 19, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to public accommodations; requiring persons owning or managing a place of public accommodations to activate closed captioning on television receivers; and adding a new Chapter 14.05 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves an implementation and evaluation plan as required by Ordinance 125604.CB 119480 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & EducationBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves an implementation and evaluation plan as required by Ordinance 125604.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125807April 24, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2018 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy; approving an implementation and evaluation plan as required by Ordinance 125604; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget; changing appropriations to the Department of Education and Early Learning and various budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $619,600,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Education & Early Learning. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a partnership agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle College District.Res 31881 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a partnership agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle College District.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 24, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the 2018 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy; approving a partnership agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle College District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $619,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Education & Early Learning. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a partnership agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle School District No. 1.Res 31882 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a partnership agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle School District No. 1.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 24, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the 2018 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy; approving a partnership agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle School District No. 1.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $619,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Education & Early Learning. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Department of Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with Seattle Academy of Arts and Sciences to renovate the….CB 119496 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationArts & CultureLibraries & Community Facilities Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Department of Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with Seattle Academy of Arts and Sciences to renovate the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125819May 16, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationArts & CultureLibraries & Community Facilities
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Department of Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with Seattle Academy of Arts and Sciences to renovate the South Park Community Center site and develop an ongoing relationship in the South Park community consistent with the Terms of Agreement in Attachment 1.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,800,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget, lifting the proviso in Section 8 regarding expenditure of funds appropriated in the Combined….CB 119515 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentWater & WastewaterEconomic Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget, lifting the proviso in Section 8 regarding expenditure of funds appropriated in the Combined….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125822May 24, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentWater & WastewaterEconomic Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget, lifting the proviso in Section 8 regarding expenditure of funds appropriated in the Combined Sewer Overflow Budget Control Level for construction of the Ship Canal Water Quality Project Storage Tunnel, as Seattle Public Utilities has completed 100% project design and has met the requirement for reporting to the City Council Civil Rights, Utilities, Economic Development & Arts Committee.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $570,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119512 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125832June 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s 2019 Budget; authorizing acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Seattle Department of Transportation and Seattle Center to accept specified grants and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation in various budget control levels, and from various funds in the 2019 Budget; adding new projects to the 2019-2024 CIP; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2019-2024 CIP; making cash transfers between the General Fund and the Transportation Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $34,553,956. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation (SDOT). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts and approving an application for surplus federal property at Fort Lawton, including a redevelopment plan, and authorizing the City of Seattle….Res 31887 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts and approving an application for surplus federal property at Fort Lawton, including a redevelopment plan, and authorizing the City of Seattle….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 18, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting and approving an application for surplus federal property at Fort Lawton, including a redevelopment plan, and authorizing the City of Seattle Office of Housing to forward an application to the United States Department of Defense and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in response to the closure of the Fort Lawton Army Reserve Center.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $40,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution, pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, of an agreement with King County regarding the imposition and allocation of property tax….CB 119539 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMSTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution, pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, of an agreement with King County regarding the imposition and allocation of property tax….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125850June 28, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Emergency Medical Services; authorizing execution, pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, of an agreement with King County regarding the imposition and allocation of property tax revenues generated by a six-year, voter-approved King County-wide tax levy for emergency medical services; approving the submittal by King County of a proposition to the voters seeking authority to levy those additional taxes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $68,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union….CB 119553 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originElectricityCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125857July 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCollective Bargainingfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 77 Power Marketers Unit to be effective January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to Yesler Crescent Improvements.CB 119552 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to Yesler Crescent Improvements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125856July 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to Yesler Crescent Improvements; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 budget including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); lifting a proviso imposed on the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Building for the Future Budget Summary Level in 2019 for improvements to the Yesler Crescent Corridor adopted in the 2019 budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2019-2024 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $970,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedDept. of Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Adopts The City of Seattle 2019 Annual Action Plan to the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its….CB 119550 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts The City of Seattle 2019 Annual Action Plan to the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125864July 26, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting The City of Seattle 2019 Annual Action Plan to the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; authorizing acceptance of grant funds from that department for programs and activities included in the Annual Action Plan; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, by modifying appropriations to various departments and budget control levels in the 2019 Adopted Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $21,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHuman Services Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute an amendment to the facility use agreement with Force 10 Hoops, LLC, authorized by Ordinance….CB 119549 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute an amendment to the facility use agreement with Force 10 Hoops, LLC, authorized by Ordinance….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125868July 26, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute an amendment to the facility use agreement with Force 10 Hoops, LLC, authorized by Ordinance 125323 for use and occupancy of KeyArena for playing of professional women’s basketball games; making findings of fact about the value provided by professional women’s basketball in Seattle; amending the relocation payment structure in the agreement; and exempting the amendment from the requirements of Chapter 20.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,600,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 budget including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119588 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationBudget & AppropriationsCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 budget including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125879August 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationBudget & AppropriationsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 budget including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); authorizing the acceptance of a donation of real property in Seattle from Forterra NW for open space, park, and recreation purposes; authorizing acceptance of a donation of cash; increasing appropriations to Seattle Parks and Recreation in the 2019 Adopted Budget; and revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2019-2024 CIP.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $24,511,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Conforming the Seattle Municipal Code to state law for crimes that require the submission of biological samples to the State of Washington.CB 119589 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Conforming the Seattle Municipal Code to state law for crimes that require the submission of biological samples to the State of Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125881August 9, 2019
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; conforming the Seattle Municipal Code to state law for crimes that require the submission of biological samples to the State of Washington; making technical corrections; adding a new Chapter 12A.09 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Sections 3.33.020, 12A.04.100, 12A.06.030, 12A.06.130, 12A.06.155, 12A.06.195, and 12A.10.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 12A.06.010, 12A.06.035, 12A.06.040, 12A.06.180, 12A.10.040, 12A.10.130, and 12A.10.140 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates the position of code reviser.CB 119594 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates the position of code reviser.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125890August 19, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to interpretations, corrections, and revisions of the Seattle Municipal Code; creating the position of code reviser; authorizing the code reviser to correct and revise nonsubstantive errors in the Seattle Municipal Code; adding rules of construction for the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Section 1.01.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 1.03 and Sections 1.04.030, 1.04.040, 1.04.050, 1.04.060, 1.04.070, and 1.04.080 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $9,000,000 for design of the streetcar.CB 119602 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $9,000,000 for design of the streetcar.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125889August 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
TransitBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Center City Streetcar Connector project; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $9,000,000 for design of the streetcar; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation; and revising project allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2019-2024 CIP.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes the Department to enter and participate in the Western Energy Imbalance Market, including the ability to execute additional agreements necessary or….CB 119571 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Department to enter and participate in the Western Energy Imbalance Market, including the ability to execute additional agreements necessary or….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125904September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Department to enter and participate in the Western Energy Imbalance Market, including the ability to execute additional agreements necessary or convenient to participating in the Western Energy Imbalance Market.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Requiring major paving projects to include protected bicycle lanes as identified in The City of Seattle Bicycle Master Plan.CB 119601 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTraffic SafetyPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring major paving projects to include protected bicycle lanes as identified in The City of Seattle Bicycle Master Plan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125902September 6, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic SafetyPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the construction of protected bicycle lanes; requiring major paving projects to include protected bicycle lanes as identified in The City of Seattle Bicycle Master Plan; and adding a new Chapter 15.80 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Removing the properties from the limited access highway purposes property designation previously assigned to them.CB 119609 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originAffordable HousingParks & RecreationCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Removing the properties from the limited access highway purposes property designation previously assigned to them.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125916September 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingParks & RecreationCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to certain City-owned properties located in the South Lake Union neighborhood and declaring them as surplus to the City’s needs; removing the properties from the limited access highway purposes property designation previously assigned to them; authorizing sale of the properties for an aggregate selling price of $138,500,000, together with additional cash and non-cash consideration, including the purchaser’s covenant to develop affordable housing and to negotiate a lease with the Seattle Parks and Recreation Department for a recreational facility to be located upon a portion of one of the properties; authorizing the Mayor or designee to execute a Memorandum of Understanding for the sale of the property consistent with its terms; authorizing the Superintendent of the Parks and Recreation Department or designee to negotiate, execute, and deliver a lease of the recreational facility; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation or designee to negotiate, execute, and deliver all other documents necessary or appropriate to effect the foregoing and to carry out the transactions described in this ordinance; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $143,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Requiring certain employers to limit room cleaning workloads for certain employees.CB 119554 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring certain employers to limit room cleaning workloads for certain employees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125928September 25, 2019
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; requiring certain employers to limit room cleaning workloads for certain employees; adding a new Chapter 14.27 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and amending Sections 3.15.000 and 6.208.020 of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring certain employers to make required healthcare expenditures to or on behalf of certain employees for the purpose of improving access to….CB 119555 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originPublic Health Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring certain employers to make required healthcare expenditures to or on behalf of certain employees for the purpose of improving access to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125930September 25, 2019
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Public Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; requiring certain employers to make required healthcare expenditures to or on behalf of certain employees for the purpose of improving access to medical care; adding a new Chapter 14.28 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and amending Sections 3.15.000 and 6.208.020 of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1,680. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 14.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).CB 119556 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adding a new Chapter 14.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125929September 25, 2019
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; adding a new Chapter 14.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and amending Sections 3.15.000 and 6.208.020 of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring certain employers to take certain actions to prevent, protect, and respond to violent or harassing conduct by guests.CB 119557 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring certain employers to take certain actions to prevent, protect, and respond to violent or harassing conduct by guests.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125923September 25, 2019
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; requiring certain employers to take certain actions to prevent, protect, and respond to violent or harassing conduct by guests; adding a new Chapter 14.26 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and amending Sections 3.15.000 and 6.208.020 of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a letter of agreement between Seattle Monorail Services, LLC and the Seattle Center Department.CB 119655 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a letter of agreement between Seattle Monorail Services, LLC and the Seattle Center Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125942October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Monorail; approving a letter of agreement between Seattle Monorail Services, LLC and the Seattle Center Department; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to negotiate and execute an amendment to the Monorail Concession Agreement previously authorized by Ordinance 124674, on terms consistent with the letter of agreement, which include but are not limited to implementation of One Regional Card for All ("ORCA") smartcard as a form of fare payment on the Monorail, alignment of the Monorail fare structure with ORCA and amendment of other fare types, establishment of a triennial schedule for future inflation based fare adjustments, extension of the term of the concession agreement through 2034, and extension of the concessionaire's right to pursue Monorail system non-fare revenues through 2039 conditioned upon concessionaire making privately-funded improvements to the Westlake Station; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, and 21.49.081.CB 119633 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, and 21.49.081.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125958October 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department for 2020; amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, and 21.49.081; adding a new Section 21.49.070 to the SMC; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77….CB 119663 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125966October 18, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77 Construction Maintenance Equipment Operator (CMEO) Unit; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Fixing the date for hearing the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751 (“Waterfront LID”) to design and construct the….Res 31915 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fixing the date for hearing the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751 (“Waterfront LID”) to design and construct the….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 22, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez, Bruce Harrell
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION fixing the date for hearing the final assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 6751 (“Waterfront LID”) to design and construct the Central Waterfront Improvement Program and directing that notice of the hearing be given in the manner required by law.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOWCP. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a cash balance reserve in the Sweetened Beverage Tax Fund to offset future revenue shortfalls and maintain program expenditures.CB 119681 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a cash balance reserve in the Sweetened Beverage Tax Fund to offset future revenue shortfalls and maintain program expenditures.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125995December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Sweetened Beverage Tax revenues; creating a cash balance reserve in the Sweetened Beverage Tax Fund to offset future revenue shortfalls and maintain program expenditures; and amending Section 5.53.055 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and….CB 119669 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125982December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and technical corrections; amending Sections 3.58.090, 15.04.074, 22.900B.010, 22.900B.020, 22.900C.010, 22.900D.010, 22.900D.070, 22.900D.090, 22.900D.100, 22.900D.110, 22.900D.140, 22.900D.145, 22.900D.150, 22.900D.160, 22.900E.020, 22.900E.030, 22.900E.040, 22.900E.050, 22.900E.060, 22.900F.010 and 22.900G.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and repealing Section 22.900G.080 of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,237,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the Traffic Code.CB 119670 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the Traffic Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125983December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the Traffic Code; amending Sections 11.14.113, 11.23.030, 11.23.120, 11.31.121, and 11.72.220 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and repealing Section 11.23.032 of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,712,245. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $2,000,000 from the Information Technology Fund to the Cable Television Franchise Fund to….CB 119675 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $2,000,000 from the Information Technology Fund to the Cable Television Franchise Fund to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125988December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of Cable Television Franchise Fund programs; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $2,000,000 from the Information Technology Fund to the Cable Television Franchise Fund to support Seattle Information Technology programs; and providing for the repayment thereof.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle IT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125462 to extend the term of an interfund loan.CB 119676 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125462 to extend the term of an interfund loan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125989December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of Equitable Development Implementation Plan projects; amending Ordinance 125462 to extend the term of an interfund loan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $16,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 123761 to extend the duration of the existing interfund loan to the Central Waterfront Improvement Fund.CB 119677 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 123761 to extend the duration of the existing interfund loan to the Central Waterfront Improvement Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125990December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Central Waterfront Improvement Program; amending Ordinance 123761 to extend the duration of the existing interfund loan to the Central Waterfront Improvement Fund; changing the lending fund from the Move Seattle Fund to the REET I Capital Project Fund; and reducing the amount of the existing interfund loan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $31,225,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOWCP. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $19,000,000 from the REET I Capital Project Fund to the Local Improvement District….CB 119678 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $19,000,000 from the REET I Capital Project Fund to the Local Improvement District….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125991December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Central Waterfront Improvement Program; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $19,000,000 from the REET I Capital Project Fund to the Local Improvement District (LID) No. 6751 Fund (“Waterfront LID Fund”) to pay the costs of LID Improvements in anticipation of the issuance of LID Bonds.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $31,225,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOWCP. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125466 to extend the term of an interfund loan.CB 119679 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125466 to extend the term of an interfund loan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125992December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Mercer West project; amending Ordinance 125466 to extend the term of an interfund loan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $26,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….CB 119691 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126001December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal, in The City of Seattle, to finance the departments and activities of City government and to provide for the general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements for the year beginning on the first day of January 2020; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $565,630,653. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….CB 119673 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125986December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and for other City purposes approved by ordinance, and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; creating the 2020 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund (Tax-Exempt) and 2020 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund (Taxable); amending Ordinance 124924 and Ordinance 125715; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $65,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates tax return and payment dates.CB 119683 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates tax return and payment dates.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125997December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; updating tax return and payment dates; and amending Section 5.55.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….CB 119674 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125987December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission, and distribution system of the City; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds to pay part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve fund requirement (if any), and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds and authorizing their issuance as either senior lien parity bonds or junior lien bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $225,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Concerning minimum compensation standards for transportation network company drivers.CB 119687 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Concerning minimum compensation standards for transportation network company drivers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125977December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to transportation network company driver labor standards; concerning minimum compensation standards for transportation network company drivers; and adding a new Chapter 14.31 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Labor Standards. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes deactivation protections for transportation network company drivers.CB 119686 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes deactivation protections for transportation network company drivers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125976December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to transportation network company drivers; establishing deactivation protections for transportation network company drivers; amending Section 3.15.000 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 14.32 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Labor Standards. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the per-ride fee amount for trips originating in Seattle.CB 119685 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the per-ride fee amount for trips originating in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125975December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to transportation network company fees; changing the per-ride fee amount for trips originating in Seattle; deleting obsolete provisions; and amending Section 6.310.150 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,095,896. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a funding agreement and a future construction agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Aquarium Society for a new….CB 119700 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a funding agreement and a future construction agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Aquarium Society for a new….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126015December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Waterfront Project; authorizing a funding agreement and a future construction agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Aquarium Society for a new aquarium facility to be known as the Ocean Pavilion; finding that the funding and construction agreements authorized by this ordinance meet the intent and purpose of the project development agreement and comprehensive funding plan described under Ordinance 125630; and amending Ordinance 125630 accordingly.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $34,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOWCP. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides salary increases for 2019, 2020 and 2021 for certain non-represented City job titles.CB 119714 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides salary increases for 2019, 2020 and 2021 for certain non-represented City job titles.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126008December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; providing salary increases for 2019, 2020 and 2021 for certain non-represented City job titles; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,106,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Requests the Chief Technology Officer to set the program’s guidelines, goals, project eligibility and selection criteria, and maximum grant awards, and to….Res 31919 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requests the Chief Technology Officer to set the program’s guidelines, goals, project eligibility and selection criteria, and maximum grant awards, and to….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Technology Matching Fund program; requesting the Chief Technology Officer to set the program’s guidelines, goals, project eligibility and selection criteria, and maximum grant awards, and to execute contracts and encumber funds in support of the program; approving the membership requirements of a review committee to recommend project selection under the program; and requesting the Chief Technology Officer to approve projects under the program after receiving recommendations from the review committee.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Information Technology. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 4.26.005, 4.26.010, 4.26.020, 4.26.040, 4.26.070, 4.27.010, 4.27.020, 4.27.050, 4.29.010, 4.29.030, 4.29.050, and 4.29.070 to harmonize with the….CB 119717 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 4.26.005, 4.26.010, 4.26.020, 4.26.040, 4.26.070, 4.27.010, 4.27.020, 4.27.050, 4.29.010, 4.29.030, 4.29.050, and 4.29.070 to harmonize with the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126011December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 4.26.005, 4.26.010, 4.26.020, 4.26.040, 4.26.070, 4.27.010, 4.27.020, 4.27.050, 4.29.010, 4.29.030, 4.29.050, and 4.29.070 to harmonize with the Washington State Paid Family and Medical Leave program and provide additional related enhancements to City employees for paid and unpaid leave benefits; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,900,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement and also a Memorandum of Agreement between The City of Seattle and the International….CB 119718 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement and also a Memorandum of Agreement between The City of Seattle and the International….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126007December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement and also a Memorandum of Agreement between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 77; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $856,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizing, in 2019, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119721 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2019, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126023December 23, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2019, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Law Department, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Police Department, Seattle Public Library, Department of Parks and Recreation, and Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,421,551. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a development agreement and lease with the Seattle Art Museum for the….CB 119150 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationArts & Culture Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a development agreement and lease with the Seattle Art Museum for the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125517January 22, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Volunteer Park; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a development agreement and lease with the Seattle Art Museum for the renovation and continued occupancy for recreation purposes of the building that has historically housed the Seattle Asian Art Museum; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $54,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the sale of the property for fair market value through a negotiated sale.CB 119195 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the sale of the property for fair market value through a negotiated sale.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125533February 23, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City-owned real property located at 1933 Minor Avenue; authorizing the sale of the property for fair market value through a negotiated sale; authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to execute all necessary documents to accomplish such property sale; and designating how proceeds from the sale shall be distributed.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Directors of Transportation and the Seattle Center to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….CB 119205 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Directors of Transportation and the Seattle Center to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125540March 16, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Directors of Transportation and the Seattle Center to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget, including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation; revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2018-2023 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $17,147,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a spending plan for the proceeds generated from a new Progressive Tax on Business to address homelessness and housing affordability authorized….Res 31810 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness ServicesTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a spending plan for the proceeds generated from a new Progressive Tax on Business to address homelessness and housing affordability authorized….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 16, 2018
Recorded vote5 in favor · 4 opposed
Homelessness ServicesTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a spending plan for the proceeds generated from a new Progressive Tax on Business to address homelessness and housing affordability authorized by the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119250.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $75,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Declares the intention of the City Council of The City of Seattle to order the construction of the Seattle Central Waterfront Improvement….Res 31812 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the intention of the City Council of The City of Seattle to order the construction of the Seattle Central Waterfront Improvement….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 1, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring the intention of the City Council of The City of Seattle to order the construction of the Seattle Central Waterfront Improvement Program, and to create a local improvement district to assess a part of the cost and expense of both carrying out certain of those improvements against the properties specially benefited thereby; notifying all persons who desire to object to such improvements to appear and present their objections; and establishing July 13, 2018, as the date the Council’s consideration of the Waterfront Local Improvement District becomes a pending quasi-judicial proceeding.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $700,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT/OW/FAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 disqualified
Repealing Ordinance 125442, which imposed a tax on short-term rental operators under Chapter 5.54 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119263 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Repealing Ordinance 125442, which imposed a tax on short-term rental operators under Chapter 5.54 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125594June 13, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE repealing Ordinance 125442, which imposed a tax on short-term rental operators under Chapter 5.54 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating portions of Broad Street, 8th Avenue North, and Mercer Street in the area bounded by Mercer Street, Dexter Avenue North, Roy….CB 119255 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating portions of Broad Street, 8th Avenue North, and Mercer Street in the area bounded by Mercer Street, Dexter Avenue North, Roy….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125599June 22, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating portions of Broad Street, 8th Avenue North, and Mercer Street in the area bounded by Mercer Street, Dexter Avenue North, Roy Street, and 9th Avenue North in the South Lake Union area, on the petition of the Seattle Department of Transportation (Clerk File 314309), and granting an easement for sewer lines to King County.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $26,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475).CB 119275 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125601June 22, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels; and creating positions in the Human Services Department.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,320,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accompanying an ordinance requesting the 2018 Families, Education, Preschool and Promise Levy to replace two expiring levies to fund early learning and….Res 31821 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originYouth & Education Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Accompanying an ordinance requesting the 2018 Families, Education, Preschool and Promise Levy to replace two expiring levies to fund early learning and….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 27, 2018
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to education services; accompanying an ordinance requesting the 2018 Families, Education, Preschool and Promise Levy to replace two expiring levies to fund early learning and preschool, college and K-12 education support, and job readiness, and providing further direction regarding implementation of the programs funded by such levy.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $619,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes material scope changes to Seattle Transportation Benefit District Proposition 1.CB 119256 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes material scope changes to Seattle Transportation Benefit District Proposition 1.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125606June 29, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Transportation Benefit District; authorizing material scope changes to Seattle Transportation Benefit District Proposition 1; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an interlocal agreement with Seattle Public Schools to provide transit passes to Seattle Public Schools students; changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation to fund the ORCA Opportunity Program; and amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475); all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a….CB 119285 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125607June 29, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Washington State Convention Center facility addition; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a temporary right of way easement with the Washington State Convention Center, Public Facilities District for the temporary reroute of Olive Way during construction of the new convention center facility; placing the easement under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $92,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, two….CB 119290 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, two….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125608June 29, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement project; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, two deeds for street purposes from ARE-1201/1208 Eastlake Avenue, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, located in a portion of Lots 1 and 2, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 9604526, recorded under King County Recording Number 9611060361, and a permanent easement for sidewalk purposes from the Washington State Employees Credit Union, a Washington State chartered credit union, located in a portion of Lot 10, Block 4, Doyle’s Addition to the City of Seattle; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by such deeds and easement under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; laying off the deeds as right-of-way; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $44,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119276 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125619July 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,303,541. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 10.79 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119266 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 10.79 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125620July 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the safe storage of and access to firearms; adding a new Chapter 10.79 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119271 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125615July 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Parks and Recreation, Seattle Department of Transportation, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Police Department, and Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,070,064. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes labor standards for domestic workers.CB 119286 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes labor standards for domestic workers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125627July 27, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; establishing labor standards for domestic workers; establishing a Domestic Workers Standards Board; prescribing remedies and enforcement procedures; amending Section 6.208.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 14.23 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $539,214. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative – CM Mosqueda. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a “Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Development of New Seattle Aquarium Facilities” between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Aquarium Society….CB 119302 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a “Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Development of New Seattle Aquarium Facilities” between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Aquarium Society….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125630July 27, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Waterfront Project; authorizing a “Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Development of New Seattle Aquarium Facilities” between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Aquarium Society, increasing the maximum amount of funding authorized for design, and requiring a comprehensive financial plan prior to execution of a Project Development Agreement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $45,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of the Waterfront. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget.CB 119306 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125635August 3, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Seattle Department of Transportation's Delridge Multimodal Corridor Project; amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget; and lifting a proviso.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedTransportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the Move Seattle Levy.Res 31830 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originGovernment Accountability Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to the Move Seattle Levy.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 13, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Government Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the Move Seattle Levy; establishing principles for developing a revised workplan for Move Seattle Levy projects to ensure transparency, accountability, and thoughtful community outreach.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $930,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development (“Plan”) and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing….CB 119311 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentEconomic DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development (“Plan”) and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125647August 17, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentEconomic DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting the 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development (“Plan”) and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); authorizing acceptance of grant funds from HUD for programs and activities included in the Plan; amending Ordinance 124496, which adopted the 2014 Annual Action Plan to the 2014-2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development, to repurpose funds to the Office of Economic Development; amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475); and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $17,413,772. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHSD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising water rates and charges for service to wholesale customers.CB 119308 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising water rates and charges for service to wholesale customers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125662September 7, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to water services of Seattle Public Utilities; revising water rates and charges for service to wholesale customers; and amending Section 21.04.440 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $380,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119352 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125677October 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department (“City Light”); amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations within City Light’s Light Fund; revising project allocations for certain capital projects in the CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $101,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of the City of Seattle and to….Res 31842 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of the City of Seattle and to….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of the City of Seattle and to legally bind the City of Seattle with respect to the Project(s) below for which the City seeks grant funding assistance managed through the Recreation and Conservation Office.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $19,634,692. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring certain employers to offer employees the opportunity to use pre-tax earnings to purchase commuter benefits, other than parking, in accordance with….CB 119329 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring certain employers to offer employees the opportunity to use pre-tax earnings to purchase commuter benefits, other than parking, in accordance with….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125684October 10, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; requiring certain employers to offer employees the opportunity to use pre-tax earnings to purchase commuter benefits, other than parking, in accordance with federal law; adding a new Chapter 14.30 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and amending Sections 3.15.000 and 6.208.020 of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the service and dedication of the Seattle Police Department’s police officers, detectives, and sergeants.Res 31855 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originPoliceCourts & Legal EnforcementCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Recognizing the service and dedication of the Seattle Police Department’s police officers, detectives, and sergeants.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 13, 2018
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceCourts & Legal EnforcementCollective Bargainingfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the service and dedication of the Seattle Police Department’s police officers, detectives, and sergeants; and requesting the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington conduct a judicial review of the Collective Bargaining Agreement reached between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Updates the City Light Department.CB 119350 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125710November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Section 21.49.086 of the Seattle Municipal Code to create Net Wholesale Revenue targets for 2019 and 2020 consistent with those assumed in the City Light 2019-2024 Strategic Plan approved by the City Council via Resolution 31819.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $60,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the Seattle Center Fee Range Schedule authorized by Section 17.16.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and repealing Attachment A to Ordinance….CB 119382 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies the Seattle Center Fee Range Schedule authorized by Section 17.16.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and repealing Attachment A to Ordinance….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125701November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; modifying the Seattle Center Fee Range Schedule authorized by Section 17.16.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and repealing Attachment A to Ordinance 125199.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,553,645. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle Center parking charges.CB 119381 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle Center parking charges.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125700November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Center parking charges; amending Section 17.19.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,838,913. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119388 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125706November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code; removing street vacation fees from the Seattle Municipal Code in conformity with the new Street Use Permit Fee Schedule; and amending Section 15.62.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,400,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the Rental Registration and Inspection Ordinance program, administered by the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections.CB 119387 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the Rental Registration and Inspection Ordinance program, administered by the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125705November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the Rental Registration and Inspection Ordinance program, administered by the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections; adding Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 22.900H.070 and 22.900H.080; and amending SMC Sections 22.214.040, 22.214.050, 22.900H.020, 22.900H.030, 22.900H.050, and 22.900H.060.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,922,061. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments….CB 119386 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125704November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and technical corrections; amending Sections 22.900B.010, 22.900B.020, 22.900C.010, 22.900D.010, 22.900D.090, 22.900D.100, 22.900D.110, 22.900D.140, 22.900D.160, 22.900E.020, 22.900E.030, 22.900E.040, 22.900E.050, 22.900E.060, 22.900F.010, 22.900G.010, and 22.900G.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,959,816. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the 2019-2020 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.CB 119383 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the 2019-2020 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125708November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; establishing the 2019-2020 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services; and superseding previous park and recreation fee schedules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $42,319,414. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $5,000,000 from the Unrestricted Cumulative Reserve Fund to the Seattle Center Fund to….CB 119379 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $5,000,000 from the Unrestricted Cumulative Reserve Fund to the Seattle Center Fund to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125717November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of Seattle Center’s operations; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $5,000,000 from the Unrestricted Cumulative Reserve Fund to the Seattle Center Fund to support the operations of Seattle Center during the temporary closure of KeyArena; and providing for the repayment thereof.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $600,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….CB 119393 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125715November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and for other City purposes approved by ordinance, and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; creating the 2019 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund; amending Ordinance 125197; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $55,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….CB 119394 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125711November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission, and distribution system of the City; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds to pay part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve fund requirement (if any), and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds and authorizing their issuance as either senior lien parity bonds or as junior lien bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $255,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125454 to increase the authorized principal amount of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds to be issued for the purposes of….CB 119395 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125454 to increase the authorized principal amount of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds to be issued for the purposes of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125712November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; amending Ordinance 125454 to increase the authorized principal amount of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds to be issued for the purposes of paying all or part of the cost of carrying out the system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system; making certain other technical amendments to Ordinance 125454 and Exhibit B thereto; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $350,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/SPU. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system.CB 119396 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125713November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system; authorizing the issuance and sale of water system revenue bonds in one or more series for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds; creating certain accounts of the City relating to the bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $68,100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/SPU. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding, deleting, and revising various Seattle Fire Department permit, certificate, inspection, and plan review fees and related provisions.CB 119389 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originFire & EMSPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding, deleting, and revising various Seattle Fire Department permit, certificate, inspection, and plan review fees and related provisions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125707November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Building and Construction Codes, Subtitle VI, Fire Code; adding, deleting, and revising various Seattle Fire Department permit, certificate, inspection, and plan review fees and related provisions; and amending Sections 15.35.010, 22.602.010, 22.602.045, 22.602.050, 22.602.070, and 22.602.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,230,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Fire Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….CB 119370 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125725November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal, in The City of Seattle, to finance the departments and activities of City government and to provide for the general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements for the year beginning on the first day of January 2019; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $539,011,321. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the School Safety Traffic and Pedestrian Improvement Fund.CB 119406 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & SidewalksYouth & Education Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates the School Safety Traffic and Pedestrian Improvement Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125719November 26, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the School Safety Traffic and Pedestrian Improvement Fund; amending Sections 5.81.010 and 5.82.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and transferring money from the School Safety Traffic and Pedestrian Improvement Fund to the General Fund for one-time expenditures.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,371,971. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119425 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125748December 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Parks and Recreation, Human Services Department, Law Department, Seattle Police Department, Seattle Fire Department, Department of Construction and Inspections, Seattle City Light, and Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,177,702. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the property located at 12705 30th Avenue Northeast surplus to the City’s needs and authorizing its sale to the Low Income….CB 118888 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the property located at 12705 30th Avenue Northeast surplus to the City’s needs and authorizing its sale to the Low Income….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125243January 13, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the sale of City real property for multifamily development; declaring the property located at 12705 30th Avenue Northeast surplus to the City’s needs and authorizing its sale to the Low Income Housing Institute or its designee; and authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute and deliver the contract for transfer of land, deed, and related documents.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,134,300. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $29,000,000 from the Low-Income Housing Fund to the 2018 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund….CB 118916 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originBridges & StructuresAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $29,000,000 from the Low-Income Housing Fund to the 2018 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125263February 24, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of affordable housing; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $29,000,000 from the Low-Income Housing Fund to the 2018 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund for bridge financing of affordable housing.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $29,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests Congress to allocate funding to adequately address the maintenance needs of the National Park System.Res 31737 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requests Congress to allocate funding to adequately address the maintenance needs of the National Park System.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 24, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting Congress to allocate funding to adequately address the maintenance needs of the National Park System.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $510,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Related to appropriations for the Seattle Information Technology Department.CB 118904 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to appropriations for the Seattle Information Technology Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125268March 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Technology & BroadbandBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to appropriations for the Seattle Information Technology Department; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 budget; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,970,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Adding a new Section 3.15.007 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118915 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Section 3.15.007 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125273March 10, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s Office of Labor Standards; adding a new Section 3.15.007 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, changing appropriations for the Office of Labor Standards and authorizing cash transfers to support appropriations changes; and establishing a special Office of Labor Standards Subfund to guarantee annual funding of The City of Seattle’s Office of Labor Standards from the City’s existing business license tax revenues.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,746,889. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Authorizes the Housing Director to grant a temporary construction easement and permanent utility and driveway easements over City-owned property South of Building….CB 118927 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Housing Director to grant a temporary construction easement and permanent utility and driveway easements over City-owned property South of Building….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125282March 31, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the proposed Mercy Housing Northwest project for development of low-income housing and non-residential space in Building 9 at Sand Point near Warren G. Magnuson Park; authorizing the Housing Director to grant a temporary construction easement and permanent utility and driveway easements over City-owned property South of Building 9 to benefit the Building 9 property; and authorizing related documents and actions.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the CEO/General Manager of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an amendment to the contract with Waste Management of Washington, Inc., for….CB 118932 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the CEO/General Manager of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an amendment to the contract with Waste Management of Washington, Inc., for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125285April 10, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the CEO/General Manager of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an amendment to the contract with Waste Management of Washington, Inc., for waste disposal and transportation services; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, changing appropriations for Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.CB 118947 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125297April 28, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system; authorizing the issuance and sale of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds, in one or more series, for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing for certain terms, conditions, covenants and the manner of sale of the bonds; describing the lien of the bonds; creating certain accounts of the City relating to the bonds; amending certain provisions set forth in the Omnibus Refunding Bond Ordinance relating to drainage and wastewater refunding revenue bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $205,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118949 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125301May 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts, all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,154,306. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2017-2018.CB 118962 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2017-2018.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125308May 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to housing for low-income households; adopting the Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2017-2018; adopting Housing Funding Policies for the 2016 Housing Levy and other fund sources; authorizing actions by the Housing Director regarding past and future housing loans and contracts; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $290,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the 2017 City of Seattle and Seattle Housing Authority Joint Assessment of Fair Housing and authorizing its submission to the Office….CB 118961 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the 2017 City of Seattle and Seattle Housing Authority Joint Assessment of Fair Housing and authorizing its submission to the Office….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125307May 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting the 2017 City of Seattle and Seattle Housing Authority Joint Assessment of Fair Housing and authorizing its submission to the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, creating and revising budget control levels, modifying positions, and changing appropriations to various departments….CB 118908 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, creating and revising budget control levels, modifying positions, and changing appropriations to various departments….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125314June 1, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, creating and revising budget control levels, modifying positions, and changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $893,532. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118977 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125318June 1, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2017 Budget; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); and creating nonexempt positions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $930,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 3.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).CB 118969 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceGovernment Accountability Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 3.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125315June 1, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to civilian and community oversight of the police; adding a new Chapter 3.29 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); recodifying Subchapters VII, VIII, and IX of Chapter 3.28 of the SMC as Subchapters I, II, and III of Chapter 3.29; amending or repealing sections in Chapters 3.28, 4.08, and 14.12 of the SMC; and concerning Ordinance 118482.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $350,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute a facility use agreement with Force 10 Hoops, LLC, for use and occupancy of KeyArena….CB 118976 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute a facility use agreement with Force 10 Hoops, LLC, for use and occupancy of KeyArena….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125323June 8, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute a facility use agreement with Force 10 Hoops, LLC, for use and occupancy of KeyArena and adjacent areas at the Seattle Center; making findings of fact about the value provided by professional women’s basketball in Seattle; exempting the agreement from the requirements of Chapter 20.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and superseding an earlier agreement authorized by Ordinance 122907.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,600,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.CB 118990 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125332June 23, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation; revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2017-2022 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $138,887,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to a settlement agreement between the City, the Washington State Department of Transportation, King County, and the Alliance for Pioneer Square….CB 118975 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to a settlement agreement between the City, the Washington State Department of Transportation, King County, and the Alliance for Pioneer Square….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125330June 23, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to a settlement agreement between the City, the Washington State Department of Transportation, King County, and the Alliance for Pioneer Square related to an appeal of the City’s Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk projects; approving the agreement and authorizing the Directors of the Office of the Waterfront and the Department of Transportation to implement the terms of the settlement agreement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to execute a second amendment to the Yesler Terrace Cooperative Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of….CB 119005 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to execute a second amendment to the Yesler Terrace Cooperative Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125342July 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the redevelopment of Yesler Terrace by the Housing Authority of the City of Seattle; authorizing the Mayor to execute a second amendment to the Yesler Terrace Cooperative Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Seattle that was authorized by Ordinance 123961; and authorizing the directors of the Office of Housing and Department of Neighborhoods to implement the Cooperative Agreement as amended.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $30,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.CB 119008 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125346July 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, including the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation; revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2017-2022 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $151,588,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 14.11, consisting of Sections 14.11.010, 14.11.020, 14.11.030, 14.11.040, 14.11.050, and 14.11.060, to the Seattle Municipal Code to codify….CB 119018 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolice Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 14.11, consisting of Sections 14.11.010, 14.11.020, 14.11.030, 14.11.040, 14.11.050, and 14.11.060, to the Seattle Municipal Code to codify….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125358July 28, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to bias-free policing; adding a new Chapter 14.11, consisting of Sections 14.11.010, 14.11.020, 14.11.030, 14.11.040, 14.11.050, and 14.11.060, to the Seattle Municipal Code to codify Seattle’s commitment to bias-free policing, require the Seattle Police Department to have bias-free policing policies and training, create an enforcement mechanism against biased policing, and collect data to help ensure that biased policing does not occur.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 112 and 113 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land….CB 118982 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 112 and 113 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125360August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 112 and 113 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the 23rd and Union node of the 23rd & Union-Jackson Residential Urban Village; amending Section 23.47A.009 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adopt development standards for certain properties in the 23rd & Union-Jackson Residential Urban Village; and amending Sections 23.58C.040 and 23.58C.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code to implement Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,400,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 118 and 119 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land….CB 118983 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 118 and 119 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125361August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 118 and 119 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the 23rd and Jackson node of the 23rd & Union-Jackson Residential Urban Village to support community vision and implement Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA); and amending Section 23.47A.009 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adopt development standards for certain properties in the 23rd & Union-Jackson Residential Urban Village.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,700,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to execute an Agreement with the State of Washington whereby the State will fund the….CB 119021 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to execute an Agreement with the State of Washington whereby the State will fund the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125364August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the reconstruction of Alaskan Way and the construction of Elliott Way surface street improvements necessary as part of the State of Washington’s State Route 99 Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Program; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to execute an Agreement with the State of Washington whereby the State will fund the construction of those improvements by The City of Seattle; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $153,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the City’s 8th and Roy Street property as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility….CB 119034 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the City’s 8th and Roy Street property as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125372August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring the City’s 8th and Roy Street property as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purpose; authorizing the sale of this property for fair market value through a brokered sale; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department to execute all necessary documents to accomplish such property sale; and authorizing the deposit of the proceeds of the sale in the City Light Fund and allocation of part of the proceeds to the Rate Stabilization Account.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $25,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts The City of Seattle 2017 Annual Action Plan to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and….CB 119024 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts The City of Seattle 2017 Annual Action Plan to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125365August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting The City of Seattle 2017 Annual Action Plan to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; authorizing acceptance of grant funds from that department for programs and activities included in the Annual Action Plan; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, by modifying appropriations to various departments and budget control levels in the 2017 Adopted Budget; and lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,436,818. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Roosevelt RapidRide Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA).Res 31761 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Roosevelt RapidRide Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA).

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Roosevelt RapidRide Project; adopting the Roosevelt RapidRide Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA); endorsing efforts to pursue federal and regional funding for the Roosevelt RapidRide Project; and committing to fully funding the Project Development phase at $4.3 million in 2017.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $70,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to City public works and the priority hire program.CB 119032 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to City public works and the priority hire program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125368August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to City public works and the priority hire program; amending Sections 20.37.010, 20.37.020, 20.37.040, and 20.37.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code to change references to “project labor agreement” to “community workforce agreement,” to make certain technical corrections, and to change the number of core workers open-shop contractors may bring to a project.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2017.CB 119029 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2017.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125384August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Technology Matching Fund Program; making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2017; providing that 2017 appropriations for the Technology Matching Fund from the Cable Television Franchise Subfund and from the Information Technology Fund shall automatically carry forward into the 2018 fiscal year; allowing that any unspent funds from an individual project may be applied to another project that meets the goals of the Digital Equity Initiative; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,220,832. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle both temporary….CB 119052 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle both temporary….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125390August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle both temporary and permanent property rights from owners of property located along the alignment of the planned combined sewage conveyance and storage tunnel between 24th Avenue NW and Shilshole Avenue NW in Ballard and Interlake Avenue North and North 35th Street in Wallingford and property abutting the 24th Avenue NW pier in Ballard, that are necessary or convenient to construct, operate, and maintain the Ship Canal Water Quality Project and 3rd Avenue West Water Main Replacement Project, through negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation); placing the real property rights acquired under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities and designating the property rights acquired for utility and general municipal purposes; authorizing payment of all other costs associated with acquisition; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 14.09 (Fair Chance Housing) to the Seattle Municipal Code to regulate the use of criminal history in rental….CB 119015 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originCivil Rights Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 14.09 (Fair Chance Housing) to the Seattle Municipal Code to regulate the use of criminal history in rental….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125393August 23, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Bruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to housing regulations; adding a new Chapter 14.09 (Fair Chance Housing) to the Seattle Municipal Code to regulate the use of criminal history in rental housing; authorizing the Seattle Office for Civil Rights to enforce the regulations set out in this new chapter; and amending Section 3.14.931 of the Seattle Municipal Code to expand the Seattle Human Rights Commission’s duties.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to enter into a renewed Cable Television Franchise Agreement and an agreement regarding additional public….CB 119030 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to enter into a renewed Cable Television Franchise Agreement and an agreement regarding additional public….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125403September 12, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to cable television; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to enter into a renewed Cable Television Franchise Agreement and an agreement regarding additional public benefits with WaveDivision I, LLC; and authorizing the Chief Technology Officer to enter into other agreements for the purpose of implementing or administering the renewed franchise.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,960,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of an Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale and Development Agreement with Bosa Development US LLC, for the construction….CB 119045 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of an Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale and Development Agreement with Bosa Development US LLC, for the construction….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125401September 12, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the sale and redevelopment of the former Public Safety Building block; authorizing the execution of an Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale and Development Agreement with Bosa Development US LLC, for the construction of a residential project with public parking, public open space and associated retail space; authorizing the acceptance of an easement from Bosa on that property; and authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute documents and take other actions in connection with this project.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $21,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Related to appropriations for the Office of Arts & Culture.CB 119037 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to appropriations for the Office of Arts & Culture.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125416September 29, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to appropriations for the Office of Arts & Culture; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget; and lifting a proviso imposed on the Office of Arts & Culture’s Capital Arts Budget Control Level by Seattle City Council Green Sheet 68-1-B-1.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring Departments seeking Council approval to provide advance notification to the City Council and the City Clerk when Departments recommend initiating new….CB 119054 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requiring Departments seeking Council approval to provide advance notification to the City Council and the City Clerk when Departments recommend initiating new….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125417September 29, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s contracting practices; requiring Departments seeking Council approval to provide advance notification to the City Council and the City Clerk when Departments recommend initiating new services or consultant contracts or amending existing services or consultant contracts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a second amendment of the Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Renovation and Expansion of the Seattle Aquarium and Development of the Central….CB 119086 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a second amendment of the Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Renovation and Expansion of the Seattle Aquarium and Development of the Central….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125422September 29, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Waterfront Project; authorizing a second amendment of the Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Renovation and Expansion of the Seattle Aquarium and Development of the Central Waterfront Project between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Aquarium Society.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $45,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….CB 119117 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125476November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal, in The City of Seattle, to finance the departments and activities of City government and to provide for the general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements for the year beginning on the first day of January 2018; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $499,105,419. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124904 to extend the term of an interfund loan.CB 119098 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124904 to extend the term of an interfund loan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125466November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Mercer West project; amending Ordinance 124904 to extend the term of an interfund loan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $26,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119099 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125452November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,450,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.CB 119102 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125454November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system; authorizing the issuance and sale of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds in one or more series for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of those bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $210,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of drainage and wastewater refunding revenue bonds for the purpose….CB 119103 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of drainage and wastewater refunding revenue bonds for the purpose….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125455November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; authorizing the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of drainage and wastewater refunding revenue bonds for the purpose of carrying out the current or advance refunding of all or a portion of the City’s outstanding drainage and wastewater revenue bonds pursuant to an approved refunding plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the administrative costs of carrying out such refundings and paying costs of issuance of the Refunding Parity Bonds; describing the lien of those Refunding Parity Bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; rescinding the authorization to issue any future Refunding Parity Bonds under Ordinance 121938 (as amended by Ordinances 122209 and 122637, as amended and restated by Ordinance 124338, and as further amended by Ordinance 124914); authorizing the Director of Finance to enter into agreements providing for the disposition of the Refunding Parity Bond proceeds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….CB 119110 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125456November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and for other City purposes approved by ordinance, and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; amending Ordinance 125197 to rescind and reapprove the authorization for certain previously authorized but unissued debt; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $85,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of limited tax general obligation refunding bonds and unlimited tax….CB 119109 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of limited tax general obligation refunding bonds and unlimited tax….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125457November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of limited tax general obligation refunding bonds and unlimited tax general obligation refunding bonds for the purpose of carrying out the current or advance refunding of all or part of the City’s outstanding limited tax general obligation bonds, carrying out the current or advance refunding of all or part of the City’s outstanding unlimited tax general obligation bonds pursuant to an approved refunding plan, and to pay the administrative costs of carrying out such refundings and the costs of issuance of the refunding bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; rescinding the authorization to issue any future general obligation refunding bonds under Ordinance 121651 (as previously amended by Ordinance 122286, and as previously amended and restated by Ordinance 124343); authorizing the Director of Finance to enter into agreements providing for the disposition of the refunding bond proceeds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the solid waste system.CB 119101 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the solid waste system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125458November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the solid waste system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the solid waste system; authorizing the issuance and sale of solid waste system revenue bonds, in one or more series, for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of solid waste system refunding revenue bonds, for the purpose….CB 119100 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of solid waste system refunding revenue bonds, for the purpose….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125461November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the solid waste system of The City of Seattle; authorizing the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of solid waste system refunding revenue bonds, for the purpose of carrying out the current or advance refunding of all or a portion of the City’s outstanding solid waste system revenue bonds pursuant to an approved refunding plan, providing for the reserve requirement and paying the administrative costs of carrying out such refundings and paying costs of issuance of the Refunding Parity Bonds; describing the lien of those Refunding Parity Bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; rescinding the authorization to issue any future Refunding Parity Bonds under Ordinance 121940 (as amended by Ordinance 122498, as amended and restated by Ordinance 124915); authorizing the Director of Finance to enter into agreements providing for the disposition of the Refunding proceeds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….CB 119105 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125459November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and electric power generation, transmission, and distribution system of the City; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds to pay part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve fund requirement (if any), and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; describing the lien of the bonds and authorizing their issuance as either senior lien parity bonds or as junior lien bonds; creating a Junior Lien Debt Service Fund, and certain other funds and accounts relating thereto; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $275,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of municipal light and power refunding revenue….CB 119104 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of municipal light and power refunding revenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125460November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of municipal light and power refunding revenue bonds for the carrying out the current or advance refunding of all or a portion of the City’s outstanding municipal light and power revenue bonds pursuant to an approved refunding plan, providing for the reserve requirement (if any), and paying the administrative costs of carrying out such refundings and paying costs of issuance of the refunding bonds; describing the lien of those refunding bonds and authorizing their issuance as either senior lien parity bonds or as junior lien bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; rescinding the authorization to issue any future refunding parity bonds under Ordinance 121941 (as amended by Ordinance 122838, as amended and restated by Ordinance 124335, and as further amended by Ordinance 124916); authorizing the Director of Finance to enter into agreements providing for the disposition of the refunding bond proceeds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119122 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125447November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Parks and Recreation, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Police Department, the Seattle Department of Transportation, and the Cable Television Franchise Subfund to accept specified grants and private funding and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,593,322. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 14.36 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119113 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 14.36 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125467November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; adding a new Chapter 14.36 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and establishing a retirement-savings program for certain employees working in Seattle.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $25,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125212, relating to the financing of Equitable Development Implementation Plan projects.CB 119135 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125212, relating to the financing of Equitable Development Implementation Plan projects.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125462November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125212, relating to the financing of Equitable Development Implementation Plan projects; changing the source of the interfund loan from the Finance and Administrative Services Fund to the Revenue Stabilization Fund; increasing the loan of funds from $6,500,000 to $16,000,000; and amending Ordinance 125207 to change appropriations to various departments and budget control levels and from various funds in the 2017 Budget.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $16,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 3.93, consisting of Section 3.93.010, to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119138 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 3.93, consisting of Section 3.93.010, to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125479November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsKirsten Harris-Talley
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to procedures for filling Council vacancies; adding a new Chapter 3.93, consisting of Section 3.93.010, to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 6.600, Short-Term Rentals, to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119081 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 6.600, Short-Term Rentals, to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125490December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess, Rob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the regulation of short-term rental businesses; adding a new Chapter 6.600, Short-Term Rentals, to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Calling for the issuance of a combined Request for Proposals (RFP) for the disposition of 800 Mercer Street and 620 Aurora Avenue….Res 31786 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Calling for the issuance of a combined Request for Proposals (RFP) for the disposition of 800 Mercer Street and 620 Aurora Avenue….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for the issuance of a combined Request for Proposals (RFP) for the disposition of 800 Mercer Street and 620 Aurora Avenue N where that disposition would address neighborhood interests, creating opportunities for all City residents to take advantage of South Lake Union as a “neighborhood of opportunity.”

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $26,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119157 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125494December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Parks and Recreation, Finance and Administrative Services Department, Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, Seattle Department of Transportation, Seattle Fire Department, and Seattle Police Department to accept specified grants and private funding and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $11,690,607. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the City of Seattle 2014, 2015, and 2017 Annual Action Plans to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and….CB 119158 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentEconomic DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the City of Seattle 2014, 2015, and 2017 Annual Action Plans to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125491December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentEconomic DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; amending the City of Seattle 2014, 2015, and 2017 Annual Action Plans to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development to repurpose funds to Office of Economic Development (OED) neighborhood business district activities, business technical assistance, Section 108 loan repayment activities, and Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda (HALA) implementation activities, and to add disposition of real property; amending Ordinances 124496, 124756, and 125365, which adopted the 2014, 2015, and 2017 Annual Action Plans; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, by modifying appropriations to various departments and budget control levels in the 2017 Adopted Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $11,905,881. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides wage increases effective December 31, 2014, December 30, 2015, December 28, 2016 and December 27, 2017 for certain non-represented City employees….CB 118603 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides wage increases effective December 31, 2014, December 30, 2015, December 28, 2016 and December 27, 2017 for certain non-represented City employees….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124975January 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; providing wage increases effective December 31, 2014, December 30, 2015, December 28, 2016 and December 27, 2017 for certain non-represented City employees and officers; providing adjustments to certain pay titles in addition to the 2015 wage increase; authorizing a $15 per hour minimum wage for all non-represented City of Seattle employees; authorizing and directing the Seattle Human Resources Director to change rates of pay for certain job titles to a minimum of $15 per hour effective April 1, 2015; authorizing paid leave for City employees who took furloughs in 2010; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $916,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Madison Corridor BRT Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA).Res 31647 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Madison Corridor BRT Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA).

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 5, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Madison Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project; adopting the Madison Corridor BRT Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA); and endorsing efforts to pursue federal funding for the Madison BRT Project.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Repealing and amending various sections of the Transit Master Plan as adopted by Resolution 31367 and adopting new sections.Res 31648 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Repealing and amending various sections of the Transit Master Plan as adopted by Resolution 31367 and adopting new sections.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 5, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to transportation; repealing and amending various sections of the Transit Master Plan as adopted by Resolution 31367 and adopting new sections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $30,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a….CB 118617 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124990February 11, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement project; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a permanent easement from Neubert Family Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, located in a portion of Lots 6, 7, and 8, together with a portion of the vacated alley abutting Lot 8, Block 17 of Town of Seattle, as laid out by D. S. Maynard, commonly known as D.S. Maynard’s Plat of Seattle, for the purposes of constructing, repairing, replacing, and maintaining a Yesler Way abutment wall, sidewalk, and other transportation infrastructure; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by such easement under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $16,100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Directing the Office of Sustainability and Environment to make building energy benchmarking reports and, where available, an energy performance rating available to….CB 118630 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Directing the Office of Sustainability and Environment to make building energy benchmarking reports and, where available, an energy performance rating available to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125000March 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to building energy use benchmarking and reporting; directing the Office of Sustainability and Environment to make building energy benchmarking reports and, where available, an energy performance rating available to the public; amending Sections 22.920.060, 22.920.125, and 22.920.170 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $95,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118627 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125005March 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2016 Budget; amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); creating nonexempt positions; adding new projects; and revising existing projects.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $58,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the loan of funds from the Fleet Services Subfund (50320), a subfund of the Finance and Administrative Services Fund, to the….CB 118633 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds from the Fleet Services Subfund (50320), a subfund of the Finance and Administrative Services Fund, to the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125003March 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Pacific Place Garage and the Parking Garage Operations Fund; authorizing the loan of funds from the Fleet Services Subfund (50320), a subfund of the Finance and Administrative Services Fund, to the Parking Garage Operations Fund (46010).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts The City of Seattle 2016 Annual Action Plan to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and….CB 118641 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts The City of Seattle 2016 Annual Action Plan to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125020April 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting The City of Seattle 2016 Annual Action Plan to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; authorizing acceptance of grant funds from that department for programs and activities included in the Annual Action Plan; amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, by modifying appropriations to various departments and budget control levels in the 2016 Adopted Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts, all by a three-fourths vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests that a special election be held concurrent with the August 2, 2016 primary election for submission to the qualified electors of….CB 118656 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment Accountability Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requests that a special election be held concurrent with the August 2, 2016 primary election for submission to the qualified electors of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125028May 4, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to low-income housing; requesting that a special election be held concurrent with the August 2, 2016 primary election for submission to the qualified electors of the City of a proposition to lift the limit on regular property taxes under chapter 84.55 RCW in order to authorize the City to levy additional taxes for low-income housing for up to seven years; providing for interim financing pending tax receipts; creating a levy oversight committee; requiring annual progress reports; providing for implementation of programs with funds derived from the taxes authorized; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $290,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accompanying an ordinance requesting the 2016 Housing Levy Renewal and providing further direction regarding implementation of the programs to be funded by….Res 31664 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accompanying an ordinance requesting the 2016 Housing Levy Renewal and providing further direction regarding implementation of the programs to be funded by….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 4, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to low income housing; accompanying an ordinance requesting the 2016 Housing Levy Renewal and providing further direction regarding implementation of the programs to be funded by such levy.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $290,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Office of Housing to enter into and administer an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement, as revised from the form….CB 118698 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Office of Housing to enter into and administer an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement, as revised from the form….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125058June 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to affordable housing; authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing to enter into and administer an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement, as revised from the form attached to Ordinance 124948, with King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County, and the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Kenmore, Kirkland, Mercer Island, Redmond, and Woodinville to create and operate a Regional Equitable Development Initiative Fund (REDI Fund) for the Puget Sound Region.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $21,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Solid Waste System Improvement and….Res 31677 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearSolid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Solid Waste System Improvement and….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 24, 2016
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Solid Waste System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2016, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124913 and in Ordinance 124915; confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Solid Waste System of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken and to be taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $82,175,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Finding that City ownership of the Garage no longer serves municipal purposes.CB 118713 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Finding that City ownership of the Garage no longer serves municipal purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125074July 15, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the sale of the Pacific Place Garage condominium unit (“Garage”); finding that City ownership of the Garage no longer serves municipal purposes; authorizing the sale of the Garage for $87 million to MPH PP Garage LLC; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute all documents and take other necessary actions to complete the sale of the Garage; directing the deposit of the net sale proceeds; and exempting the sale from the requirements of Resolution 29799 as amended by Resolution 30862.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $95,550,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides for certain remedial actions with respect to the City’s Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement and Refunding Bonds, 2007, including providing for….CB 118717 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides for certain remedial actions with respect to the City’s Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement and Refunding Bonds, 2007, including providing for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125075July 15, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE providing for certain remedial actions with respect to the City’s Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement and Refunding Bonds, 2007, including providing for the defeasance and redemption of certain of those bonds that are currently outstanding; creating a new fund for the expenditure of disposition proceeds; authorizing the execution of a defeasance trust agreement and the carrying out of a defeasance plan and directing the use of additional disposition proceeds; authorizing certain transfers necessary to carry out the foregoing; authorizing the purchase of certain investments and the use of their proceeds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $87,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 27 AFL-CIO-CLC….CB 118728 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originFire & EMSCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 27 AFL-CIO-CLC….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125079July 22, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 27 AFL-CIO-CLC, for the time period of January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2018; amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, by increasing appropriations to the Seattle Fire Department for providing the 2015 and 2016 payments therefor; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,611,373. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept non-City funds on behalf of the City.CB 118730 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originParks & RecreationCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept non-City funds on behalf of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125089July 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Waterfront Project, authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement concerning funding for the Parks Central Waterfront Piers Rehabilitation project (K732493) between The City of Seattle and the Friends of Waterfront Seattle; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept non-City funds on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation and the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation; revising allocations for certain projects in the 2016-2021 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to increasing the Business License Tax Certificate Fee and amending Sections 5.30.060 and 5.55.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118715 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to increasing the Business License Tax Certificate Fee and amending Sections 5.30.060 and 5.55.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125083July 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to increasing the Business License Tax Certificate Fee and amending Sections 5.30.060 and 5.55.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to increasing the Business License Tax rates and amending Section 5.45.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118716 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to increasing the Business License Tax rates and amending Section 5.45.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125084July 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to increasing the Business License Tax rates and amending Section 5.45.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Center Department to execute a third amendment to the Mercer Arena Ground Lease between the City….CB 118726 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Center Department to execute a third amendment to the Mercer Arena Ground Lease between the City….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125088July 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Mercer Arena; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Center Department to execute a third amendment to the Mercer Arena Ground Lease between the City of Seattle and Seattle Opera; and lifting a budget proviso.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $60,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to human rights.CB 118746 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to human rights.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125100August 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to human rights; and adding a new Chapter 14.21 to the Seattle Municipal Code to prohibit the practice of conversion therapy on minors.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $51,600. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone: Executive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Increasing the fee or tax on persons engaged in or carrying on the business of the collection of garbage, rubbish, trash, CDL….CB 118739 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Increasing the fee or tax on persons engaged in or carrying on the business of the collection of garbage, rubbish, trash, CDL….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125110August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE increasing the fee or tax on persons engaged in or carrying on the business of the collection of garbage, rubbish, trash, CDL waste, and other solid waste; amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 5.48.055; and providing a special referendum opportunity as required by state law.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,400,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolution 31334.Res 31688 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31334.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31334; establishing the City Council’s intent to fund the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) in accordance with the January 1, 2016, Actuarial Study.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,210,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Council direction on budget and other matters related to the North Precinct capital project (A1PS107).Res 31698 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Council direction on budget and other matters related to the North Precinct capital project (A1PS107).

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Council direction on budget and other matters related to the North Precinct capital project (A1PS107).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2016.CB 118764 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2016.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125122September 9, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Technology Matching Fund Program; making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2016; providing that 2016 appropriations for the Technology Matching Fund from the Cable Television Franchise Subfund and from the Information Technology Fund shall automatically carry forward into the 2017 fiscal year; allowing that any unspent funds from an individual project may be applied to another project that meets the goals of the Digital Equity Initiative; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,900,832. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to Seattle Public Utilities.CB 118774 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125140September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the Port of Seattle to serve as an operating agreement between Seattle Public Utilities and the Port of Seattle Drainage Utility including code modifications to exclude all Port-owned properties from the requirement to pay City stormwater and drainage fees; terminating the 1997 stormwater credit from the City to the Port; accepting a settlement payment from the Port of Seattle; containing details related to ownership and maintenance of infrastructure, authorities and responsibilities, system interconnections, access, coordination and dispute resolution; amending Section 21.33.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,990,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept a loan from the Washington State Public Works Board and to execute, deliver….CB 118775 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept a loan from the Washington State Public Works Board and to execute, deliver….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125141September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept a loan from the Washington State Public Works Board and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 14.22 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118765 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 14.22 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125135September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; adding a new Chapter 14.22 to the Seattle Municipal Code; establishing secure scheduling requirements for covered retail and food services establishments; prescribing remedies and enforcement procedures; amending Section 14.20.025 of the Seattle Municipal Code to add good faith estimates of work schedules to notice of employment information; amending Section 6.208.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code to condition business license registration on compliance with secure scheduling requirements; and amending Section 3.14.945 of the Seattle Municipal Code to add Chapter 14.22 to the list of ordinances administered and enforced by the Office of Labor Standards.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending subsection 21.49.086.D of the Seattle Municipal Code to create Net Wholesale Revenue targets for 2017 and 2018 consistent with those assumed….CB 118801 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending subsection 21.49.086.D of the Seattle Municipal Code to create Net Wholesale Revenue targets for 2017 and 2018 consistent with those assumed….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125136September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending subsection 21.49.086.D of the Seattle Municipal Code to create Net Wholesale Revenue targets for 2017 and 2018 consistent with those assumed in the City Light 2017-2022 Strategic Plan adopted by Resolution 31678.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $60,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to appropriations for the Office of Arts & Culture.CB 118771 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to appropriations for the Office of Arts & Culture.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125155October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to appropriations for the Office of Arts & Culture; amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget; and lifting a proviso imposed on the Office of Arts & Culture’s Capital Arts Budget Control Level by Seattle City Council Green Sheet 47-1-B-1.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of the City of Seattle both temporary and….CB 118760 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of the City of Seattle both temporary and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125153October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of the City of Seattle both temporary and permanent property rights from abutting property owners located along the alignment of the planned combined sewage storage tunnel between 24th Avenue NW and Shilshole Avenue NW and Interlake Avenue North and North 35th Street that are necessary or convenient to construct, operate and maintain the Ship Canal Water Quality Project, through negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation); placing the real property rights acquired under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Public Utilities and designating the property rights acquired for utility and general municipal purposes; authorizing payment of all other costs associated with acquisition; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Residential Code.CB 118780 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Residential Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125160October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Residential Code; amending Section 22.150.010of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adopting by reference Chapters 2 through 10, 12 through 24, Section P2904, Chapter 44, and Appendices F and U of the 2015 International Residential Code (IRC), and amending certain of those chapters; adding a new Chapter 1 to the IRC related to administration, permitting, and enforcement; and repealing Sections 2 through 20 of Ordinance 124282.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 23.58D to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).CB 118783 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 23.58D to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125163October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adding a new Chapter 23.58D to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); amending SMC Sections 23.40.060, 23.41.004, 23.41.012, 23.42.056, 23.45.510, 23.45.516, 23.48.021, 23.48.221, 23.48.230, 23.49.011, 23.49.023, 23.49.180, 23.50.033, 23.66.140, 23.84A.014, 23.88.010, and 23.90.018; and repealing SMC Sections 23.45.526 and 23.49.020; to revise the Living Building Pilot Program and reorganize, consolidate, and update standards when meeting the green building standard is a condition of a permit.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the 2017-2018 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.CB 118850 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the 2017-2018 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125208November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; establishing the 2017-2018 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services; superseding previous park and recreation fee schedules; and amending Section 18.28.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,501,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a Community Involvement Commission to advise and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council.CB 118834 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a Community Involvement Commission to advise and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125192November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to public outreach and engagement; creating a Community Involvement Commission to advise and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council; amending Sections 3.35.010, 3.35.030, and 3.35.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Chapter 3.62, consisting of Sections 3.62.010, 3.62.020, 3.62.030, 3.62.040, 3.62.050, and 3.62.060, to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 22.602.045, 22.602.050, 22.602.070, and 22.602.090, to add, delete, and revise various Seattle Fire Department permit, certificate, inspection….CB 118831 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originFire & EMSPermitting & Development Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 22.602.045, 22.602.050, 22.602.070, and 22.602.090, to add, delete, and revise various Seattle Fire Department permit, certificate, inspection….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125189November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Building and Construction Codes, Subtitle VI, Fire Code; amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 22.602.045, 22.602.050, 22.602.070, and 22.602.090, to add, delete, and revise various Seattle Fire Department permit, certificate, inspection, and plan review fees and related provisions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,570,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….CB 118837 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125195November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal, in The City of Seattle, to finance the departments and activities of City government and to provide for the general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements for the year beginning on the first day of January 2017; ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; and, by a vote of a majority plus one of the Seattle City Council, finding a substantial need to use, and providing for the use of, 101 percent as the regular property tax limit factor.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $484,387,400. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 118842 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMS Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125200November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMS
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Seattle Department of Transportation, Seattle Fire Department, and Seattle Police Department to accept specified grants and private funding and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $29,606,852. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions or betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system.CB 118825 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions or betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125183November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions or betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal water system; authorizing the issuance and sale of water system revenue bonds, in one or more series, for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing for certain terms, conditions, covenants, and the manner of sale of the bonds; describing the lien of the bonds; creating certain accounts of the City relating to the bonds; amending certain definitions set forth in the Omnibus Refunding Bond Ordinance relating to municipal water system refunding revenue bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $110,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….CB 118839 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125197November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and other City purposes approved by ordinance, to refinance certain outstanding City-guaranteed bonds of the Seattle Chinatown-International District Preservation and Development Authority, to provide a portion of the funds necessary to replace the Mercer Arena, and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing for certain terms, conditions, and covenants and the manner of sale of the bonds; authorizing certain agreements for the use of proceeds of the Bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $108,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Authorizes the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds for certain additions and….CB 118840 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds for certain additions and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125198November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds for certain additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and power plant and system of the City, paying the costs of issuance of those bonds, and providing for the reserve fund requirement; providing for the terms, conditions, covenants, and manner of sale of those bonds; describing the lien of those bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $275,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the fee range schedule from which the Seattle Center Director is authorized to set fees for use of Seattle Center facilities….CB 118841 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies the fee range schedule from which the Seattle Center Director is authorized to set fees for use of Seattle Center facilities….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125199November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees charged by the Seattle Center Department; modifying the fee range schedule from which the Seattle Center Director is authorized to set fees for use of Seattle Center facilities and property; and amending Section 17.16.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code to provide for adoption of future fee schedules by ordinance.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,500,355. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 117216 as last amended by Ordinance 124640 to change the date by which full funding of the Actuarial Account will….CB 118832 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 117216 as last amended by Ordinance 124640 to change the date by which full funding of the Actuarial Account will….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125190November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Firefighters’ Pension Fund established under chapter 41.16 RCW; amending Ordinance 117216 as last amended by Ordinance 124640 to change the date by which full funding of the Actuarial Account will be achieved.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $11,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Conditioning the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2017 grant applications, and repealing Ordinance 118719.CB 118847 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conditioning the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2017 grant applications, and repealing Ordinance 118719.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125205November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE conditioning the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2017 grant applications, and repealing Ordinance 118719.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $75,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Removing a classification for International Investment Management Services for the business license tax.CB 118856 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Removing a classification for International Investment Management Services for the business license tax.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125211November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the business license tax; removing a classification for International Investment Management Services for the business license tax; and amending Sections 5.30.025, 5.30.050, 5.45.050, 5.45.080, 5.45.081, 5.45.082, and 5.46.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code in connection therewith.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for a Boating Facilities Program project (Pier 62 Boat Dock) to the State’s Recreation….CB 118871 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for a Boating Facilities Program project (Pier 62 Boat Dock) to the State’s Recreation….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125221December 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation and the Office of the Waterfront; authorizing submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for a Boating Facilities Program project (Pier 62 Boat Dock) to the State’s Recreation and Conservation Funding Board as provided in chapter 79A.25 RCW and WAC 286; authorizing acceptance of the grant if awarded; authorizing entry into a project agreement if the grant is awarded; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $96,333,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget.CB 118882 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & BenefitsBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125227December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & BenefitsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2016 Budget; amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels due to changes in City employment compensation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 118875 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125225December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Education and Early Learning, Department of Parks and Recreation, Human Services Department, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Police Department, Seattle City Light, and Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and private funding and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,519,343. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation or condemnation land and all other necessary property rights located southeast….CB 118307 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation or condemnation land and all other necessary property rights located southeast….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124718February 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities and the 2015 Adopted Budget; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation or condemnation land and all other necessary property rights located southeast of the intersection of NW 54th Street and 24th Avenue NW, Seattle, Washington for public drainage, wastewater, and general municipal purposes, and to execute, accept and record deeds and convenient documents and agreements deemed by the Director to be necessary to this transaction on behalf of the City; placing the conveyed real properties under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; amending Ordinance 124648 to increase appropriations to the Drainage and Wastewater Fund for the acquisition of the aforementioned property and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation or condemnation land and all other necessary property rights located at….CB 118308 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterBudget & Appropriations Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation or condemnation land and all other necessary property rights located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124719March 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities and the 2015 Adopted Budget; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation or condemnation land and all other necessary property rights located at 5300 24th Avenue NW, Seattle, Washington for public drainage, wastewater, and general municipal purposes, and to execute, accept and record deeds and convenient documents and agreements deemed by the Director to be necessary to this transaction on behalf of the City; placing the conveyed real properties under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; amending Ordinance 124648 to increase appropriations to the Drainage and Wastewater Fund for the acquisition of the aforementioned property, and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $18,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of an amendment to the May 9, 2011 Interlocal Agreement between the City of Seattle, Washington, and the Seattle Transportation….CB 118328 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of an amendment to the May 9, 2011 Interlocal Agreement between the City of Seattle, Washington, and the Seattle Transportation….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124721February 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing execution of an amendment to the May 9, 2011 Interlocal Agreement between the City of Seattle, Washington, and the Seattle Transportation Benefit District to implement STBD Proposition 1; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $46,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Transportation Benefit District, authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an interlocal agreement with King….CB 118319 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Transportation Benefit District, authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an interlocal agreement with King….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124720February 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Transportation Benefit District, authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an interlocal agreement with King County Metro Transit to purchase the transit service necessary to implement Seattle Transportation Benefit District Proposition 1.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $29,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates the Seattle Transit Advisory Board.Res 31572 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates the Seattle Transit Advisory Board.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION creating the Seattle Transit Advisory Board.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $45,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising certain water rates and charges for service to wholesale customers, and amending Seattle Municipal Code Subsection 21.04.440.E in connection therewith.CB 118329 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising certain water rates and charges for service to wholesale customers, and amending Seattle Municipal Code Subsection 21.04.440.E in connection therewith.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124733March 19, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to water services of Seattle Public Utilities; revising certain water rates and charges for service to wholesale customers, and amending Seattle Municipal Code Subsection 21.04.440.E in connection therewith.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $38,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Office of the Waterfront to enter into a development agreement to distribute $34 million in bond proceeds….CB 118339 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Office of the Waterfront to enter into a development agreement to distribute $34 million in bond proceeds….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124737March 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Pike Place Market Preservation and Development Authority; authorizing the Director of the Office of the Waterfront to enter into a development agreement to distribute $34 million in bond proceeds and to convey certain real property located at 1901 Western Avenue, Seattle, Washington to the Authority for the development of a mixed-used project with public parking, low-income housing, public open space, retail and commercial space; authorizing the acceptance of an easement from the Authority on that property; and authorizing the Director of the Office of the Waterfront and the Housing Director to execute documents and take other actions in connection with this project.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $34,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124125 to increase the authorized amount of interfund loans for the Alaskan Way Seawall Replacement Project.CB 118346 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & Structures Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124125 to increase the authorized amount of interfund loans for the Alaskan Way Seawall Replacement Project.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124745April 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; amending Ordinance 124125 to increase the authorized amount of interfund loans for the Alaskan Way Seawall Replacement Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $290,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves an Implementation Plan as required by Ordinance 124509 and Resolution 31527.CB 118363 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves an Implementation Plan as required by Ordinance 124509 and Resolution 31527.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124749April 10, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Preschool Program; approving an Implementation Plan as required by Ordinance 124509 and Resolution 31527; amending the tuition model in the Action Plan adopted by Ordinance 124509; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $58,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the City of Seattle 2015 Annual Action Plan to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and….CB 118361 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the City of Seattle 2015 Annual Action Plan to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124756April 24, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding for housing and community development programs; adopting the City of Seattle 2015 Annual Action Plan to the 2014 - 2017 Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development and authorizing its submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; authorizing acceptance of grant funds from that department for programs and activities included in the Annual Action Plan; modifying appropriations to various departments and budget control levels in the 2015 Adopted Budget; and ratifying and confirming prior acts, all by a three-fourths vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to submit the “Plan to Protect Seattle’s Waterways” and to fulfill the obligations set forth….CB 118378 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to submit the “Plan to Protect Seattle’s Waterways” and to fulfill the obligations set forth….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124766May 8, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to submit the “Plan to Protect Seattle’s Waterways” and to fulfill the obligations set forth therein, to fulfill obligations under a Consent Decree required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Washington Department of Ecology.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $600,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the 2014 Adopted Budget, including the 2014-2019 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118374 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the 2014 Adopted Budget, including the 2014-2019 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124773May 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending the 2014 Adopted Budget, including the 2014-2019 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2014-2019 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the 2015 Adopted Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118377 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the 2015 Adopted Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124776May 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending the 2015 Adopted Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2015-2020 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 118376 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124775May 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2015 Budget; amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new projects; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2015-2020 CIP; creating both exempt and nonexempt positions; modifying positions, making cash transfers between various City funds; abandoning some appropriations; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,583,620. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing support by The City of Seattle for all workers, including musicians, to exercise their right to negotiate fair contracts, to establish….Res 31583 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing support by The City of Seattle for all workers, including musicians, to exercise their right to negotiate fair contracts, to establish….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata, Mike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing support by The City of Seattle for all workers, including musicians, to exercise their right to negotiate fair contracts, to establish equitable business relationships, and to benefit from enforceable contract standards.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $840,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget.CB 118391 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124782May 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2015 Budget; amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget; changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation and to the Human Services Department; creating both exempt and non-exempt positions; authorizing the Director of Finance to enter into an interlocal agreement with the State Department of Licensing; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by at least a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $31,278,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, and 21.49.057 in connection therewith.CB 118393 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, and 21.49.057 in connection therewith.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124786June 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department; amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, and 21.49.057 in connection therewith; adding an Aurora Avenue North Phase 3A undergrounding charge, applied to all City of Shoreline rate schedules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,900,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a partnership agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle School District No. 1, as required by Ordinance 124509.Res 31587 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a partnership agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle School District No. 1, as required by Ordinance 124509.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 18, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Preschool Program Levy; and approving a partnership agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle School District No. 1, as required by Ordinance 124509.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $58,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2015.CB 118439 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2015.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124812July 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Technology Matching Fund Program; making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2015; providing that 2015 appropriations for the Technology Matching Fund from the Cable Television Franchise Subfund and from the Information Technology Fund shall automatically carry forward into the 2016 fiscal year; allowing that any unspent funds from an individual project may be applied to another Technology Matching Fund project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,430,832. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 2Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget.CB 118451 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & StructuresBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124823August 7, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Summit Re-Implementation project in the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget; establishing the 2016 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund; authorizing the loan of funds from the City’s Consolidated (Residual) Cash Pool, or its participating funds, in the amount of $22,000,000, to the 2016 and 2017 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Funds for bridge financing of the Summit Re-Implementation project; establishing a budget control level in the 2016 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund; increasing appropriations in the 2016 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $84,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the Seattle Aquarium Society’s Master Plan for the purpose of allowing the advancement of the design of a potential on land….Res 31603 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the Seattle Aquarium Society’s Master Plan for the purpose of allowing the advancement of the design of a potential on land….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 7, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Office of the Waterfront and the Department of Parks and Recreation; approving the Seattle Aquarium Society’s Master Plan for the purpose of allowing the advancement of the design of a potential on land Aquarium expansion, so that sufficient information is available for environmental review, and directing the Office and the Department to coordinate environmental review of the Aquarium expansion with the Seattle Aquarium Society.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $45,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the definition of “gender identity” in Sections 14.04.030, 14.06.020, 14.08.020, and 14.10.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118455 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the definition of “gender identity” in Sections 14.04.030, 14.06.020, 14.08.020, and 14.10.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124829August 14, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to gender identity and all-gender single-occupant restrooms in Seattle; amending the definition of “gender identity” in Sections 14.04.030, 14.06.020, 14.08.020, and 14.10.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending the definition of “place of public accommodation” in Section 14.06.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Section 14.06.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify the right of individuals to use gender-specific facilities consistent with their gender identity; and adding a new Chapter 14.07 to the Seattle Municipal Code providing for all-gender restrooms in City-controlled buildings and places of public accommodation and prescribing enforcement procedures.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $21,230. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the Seattle Preschool Program.CB 118461 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the Seattle Preschool Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124828August 14, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the Seattle Preschool Program; approving a Comprehensive Evaluation Strategy as required by Resolution 31527.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $58,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget.CB 118474 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & StructuresBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124842August 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the North Precinct project in the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget; authorizing the loan of funds from the City’s Consolidated (Residual) Cash Pool, or its participating funds, in the amount of $2,750,000, to the 2016 Bond Fund for bridge financing of the North Precinct project; establishing a budget control level in the 2016 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund; increasing 2015 appropriations of $1,500,000 in the 2016 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $160,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 25.30 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).CB 118438 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationNeighborhoods Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 25.30 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124850September 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Historic Districts; adding a new Chapter 25.30 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); creating the Sand Point Naval Air Station Landmark District; specifying the district’s boundaries; adopting criteria for designating the district; establishing a procedure for preserving significant physical elements within the district; establishing the Sand Point Naval Air Station Landmark District Application Review Committee; providing for administration and enforcement of this Ordinance; and amending Section 22.900C.010 and Table C-1 for Section 22.900C.010 of the SMC to provide for the collection of fees for interpretation of Historic District regulations by the Department of Neighborhoods.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring owners of certain low-income housing to notify the Office of Housing and the Seattle Housing Authority of the owner's proposed sale….CB 118404 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requiring owners of certain low-income housing to notify the Office of Housing and the Seattle Housing Authority of the owner's proposed sale….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124861September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE requiring owners of certain low-income housing to notify the Office of Housing and the Seattle Housing Authority of the owner's proposed sale of that housing; establishing penalties; and adding a new Chapter 22.907 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolution 31334.Res 31617 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31334.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 5, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31334; establishing the Council’s intent to fund the Seattle City Employees' Retirement System in accordance with the January 1, 2015 Actuarial Study.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $1,170,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds for certain additions and….CB 118541 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds for certain additions and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124916December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; authorizing the issuance and sale of municipal light and power revenue bonds for the purposes of providing funds for certain additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing municipal light and power plant and system of the City, paying the costs of issuance of those bonds and providing for the reserve fund requirement; providing for the terms, conditions, covenants and manner of sale of those bonds; describing the lien of those bonds; ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; and amending certain definitions set forth in the Omnibus Refunding Bond Ordinance relating to municipal light and power revenue bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $280,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the solid waste system.CB 118542 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the solid waste system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124913December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the solid waste system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the solid waste system; authorizing the issuance and sale of solid waste system revenue bonds, in one or more series, for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing for certain terms, conditions, covenants and the manner of sale of the bonds; describing the lien of the bonds; creating certain accounts of the City relating to the bonds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $22,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.CB 118543 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124914December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; adopting a system or plan of additions and betterments to and extensions of the existing drainage and wastewater system; authorizing the issuance and sale of drainage and wastewater revenue bonds, in one or more series, for the purposes of paying part of the cost of carrying out that system or plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing for certain terms, conditions, covenants and the manner of sale of the bonds; describing the lien of the bonds; creating certain accounts of the City relating to the bonds; ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; and amending certain definitions set forth in the Omnibus Refunding Bond Ordinance relating to drainage and wastewater refunding revenue bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $140,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a Seattle Information Technology Department.CB 118529 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a Seattle Information Technology Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124920December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to certain functions of the executive branch of City government; creating a Seattle Information Technology Department; establishing the powers and duties of the new department; abolishing the Department of Information Technology and transferring functions currently performed by that department; transferring functions currently performed by other departments in the executive branch; making provisions for transition; adding Chapter 3.23; repealing Chapters 3.22 and 18.14; and amending Sections 3.39.020, 4.13.010, 5.09.020, 10.02.060, 15.32.300, and 21.60.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,134,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….CB 118540 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124924December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay all or part of the costs of various elements of the City’s capital improvement program and other City purposes approved by ordinance, to provide a contribution to the Pike Place Market Preservation and Development Authority for the financing of certain improvements, and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; providing for certain terms, conditions and covenants and the manner of sale of the bonds; amending Ordinance 123480 (as previously amended by Ordinance 124341 and Ordinance 124637); and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $134,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the loan of funds from the City’s Consolidated (Residual) Cash Pool, or its participating funds, to the Transportation Master Fund.CB 118532 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds from the City’s Consolidated (Residual) Cash Pool, or its participating funds, to the Transportation Master Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124904December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Mercer West project; authorizing the loan of funds from the City’s Consolidated (Residual) Cash Pool, or its participating funds, to the Transportation Master Fund; and providing for the repayment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $28,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 121179, as last amended by Ordinance 124638, to change the terms of the outstanding interfund loan.CB 118536 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 121179, as last amended by Ordinance 124638, to change the terms of the outstanding interfund loan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124926December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Joint Training Facility Project; amending Ordinance 121179, as last amended by Ordinance 124638, to change the terms of the outstanding interfund loan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,646,432. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….CB 118567 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124929December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the levy of property taxes; fixing the rates and/or amounts of taxes to be levied, and levying the same upon all taxable property, both real and personal, in The City of Seattle, to finance the departments and activities of City government and to provide for the general obligation bond interest and redemption requirements for the year beginning on the first day of January 2016; ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; and, by a vote of a majority plus one of the Seattle City Council, finding a substantial need to use, and providing for the use of, 101% as the regular property tax limit factor.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $452,993,687. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to exemption from admission tax.CB 118558 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to exemption from admission tax.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124902December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to exemption from admission tax; amending Section 5.40.028 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to lease or acquire by negotiation or condemnation land and all other necessary property rights….CB 118510 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to lease or acquire by negotiation or condemnation land and all other necessary property rights….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124937December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to lease or acquire by negotiation or condemnation land and all other necessary property rights located at 4500 West Marginal Way Southwest, Seattle, Washington for public drainage, wastewater, and general municipal purposes, and to execute, accept and record deeds and convenient documents and agreements deemed by the Director to be necessary to this transaction on behalf of the City; placing the conveyed real properties under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $15,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 118582 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124961December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, City Budget Office, Department of Neighborhoods, Department of Parks and Recreation, Human Services Department, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Police Department, Department of Information Technology, and Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants, private funding donations and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $14,254,157. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a Joint Project Agreement with King County to design, construct, operate, and….CB 118588 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a Joint Project Agreement with King County to design, construct, operate, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124966December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a Joint Project Agreement with King County to design, construct, operate, and maintain the Ship Canal Water Quality Project, in partial fulfillment of the objectives of the Consent Decree authorized under Ordinances 123908 and 124129, and the “Plan to Protect Seattle’s Waterways” authorized under Ordinance 124766, to reduce Combined Sewer Overflows; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $600,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 6.208 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118596 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 5 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Chapter 6.208 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124963December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the creation of a Title 6 business license; adding a new Chapter 6.208 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 5.30.030, 5.32.150, 5.55.230, 6.10.005, 6.20.050, 6.214.310, 6.250.030, 6.500.140, 7.04.645, 21.16.060, 21.16.080, and 22.214.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value5
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises environmental-review thresholds and transportation, archaeology, and cultural-resource requirements for development.CB 121093 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningArts & Culture Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises environmental-review thresholds and transportation, archaeology, and cultural-resource requirements for development.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127391February 19, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsEddie Lin
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; revising environmental review thresholds and related provisions addressing transportation-related requirements, and archaeological, and cultural resource preservation requirements; amending the title of Chapter 23.52, the title of Subchapter I of Chapter 23.52, and Sections 22.170.050, 22.170.070, 22.170.190, 23.52.004, and 25.05.800 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $56,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land-use requirements for transportation-impact studies and construction and transportation-management plans.CB 121135 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land-use requirements for transportation-impact studies and construction and transportation-management plans.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127392February 19, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsEddie Lin
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; revising requirements for transportation impact analyses, transportation management plans, and construction management plans; adding new Sections 23.52.010 and 23.52.012 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending the title of Chapter 23.52, Subchapter II, of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 15.04.035, 23.48.230, 23.48.290, 23.48.610, 23.48.710, 23.49.019, 23.50A.360, 23.52.008, 23.71.018, and 23.90.018 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates the administrative and financial framework for collecting and transferring Seattle's Social Housing Tax.CB 121153 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates the administrative and financial framework for collecting and transferring Seattle's Social Housing Tax.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127393February 19, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss, Dionne Foster
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Social Housing Tax; authorizing the Mayor or designee to enter into an interlocal agreement with the Seattle Social Housing Developer to establish the terms and procedures for the implementation, administration, transfer, reporting, and oversight of the Social Housing Tax, including provisions for reimbursement of the City’s administrative and implementation costs and outstanding loan balances; creating the Social Housing Tax Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Finance. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Allows limited herbicide use to control invasive knotweed in the Cedar River Municipal Watershed.CB 121161 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & Habitat Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allows limited herbicide use to control invasive knotweed in the Cedar River Municipal Watershed.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127397February 25, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Cedar River Municipal Watershed; amending the Secondary Use Policies, adopted by Ordinance 114632, to provide for the limited application of the herbicide imazapyr to treat invasive knotweed species; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily blocks new or expanded detention centers while Seattle develops permanent land-use rules.CB 121174 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Temporarily blocks new or expanded detention centers while Seattle develops permanent land-use rules.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127401March 10, 2026
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adopting a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, processing, or approval of applications for the establishment, expansion, or change of use for detention centers; adding a definition for detention centers; amending Section 23.84A.008 of the Seattle Municipal Code; approving a work plan; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requires a 60-day pause when Seattle's police surveillance systems trigger specified data-collection concerns.CB 121179 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requires a 60-day pause when Seattle's police surveillance systems trigger specified data-collection concerns.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127412April 6, 2026
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to collection of surveillance data; specifying conditions for a mandatory 60-day pause in data collection for Seattle Police Department Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) and Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) systems; and amending Ordinances 127044 and 127297.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCouncil. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a collective-bargaining agreement with plumbers and pipefitters represented by Local 32.CB 121189 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a collective-bargaining agreement with plumbers and pipefitters represented by Local 32.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127416April 14, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry, Local 32; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $375. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDHR. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Expands city authority to lease property for use as transitional homeless encampments.CB 121184 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness Services Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expands city authority to lease property for use as transitional homeless encampments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127423April 27, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to leases; expanding the Director of Finance and Administrative Services’ authority to execute leases when the land is used for transitional encampment purposes; amending Section 3.127.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $4,066. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Removes a temporary rule allowing residential use in the Stadium Transition Area Overlay District.CB 121171 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Removes a temporary rule allowing residential use in the Stadium Transition Area Overlay District.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127430May 14, 2026
Official sponsorsEddie Lin
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; repealing Ordinance 127191, which allowed residential use within the Stadium Transition Area Overlay District under Chapter 23.74 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends Seattle Public Utilities' agreement supporting South Park flood preparation and emergency response.CB 121202 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originZoningParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends Seattle Public Utilities' agreement supporting South Park flood preparation and emergency response.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127434May 22, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities, or designee, to execute an amendment to the interlocal agreement between Seattle Public Utilities and the King County Flood Control Zone District for the South Park Interim Flooding Preparedness and Response Program; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities, or designee, to execute additional amendments to the interlocal agreement between Seattle Public Utilities and the King County Flood Control Zone District for the South Park Interim Flooding Preparedness and Response Program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,620,615. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates an official Arts and Cultural District in the Columbia and Hillman City neighborhoods.Res 32200 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates an official Arts and Cultural District in the Columbia and Hillman City neighborhoods.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 22, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution creating an Arts and Cultural District in the Columbia Hillman City neighborhood of Seattle.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $110,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Arts and Culture. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates an official Arts and Cultural District in Seattle's Georgetown neighborhood.Res 32201 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates an official Arts and Cultural District in Seattle's Georgetown neighborhood.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 22, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution creating an Arts and Cultural District in the Georgetown neighborhood of Seattle.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $110,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Arts and Culture. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily expands how much capacity transitional homeless encampments may provide under Seattle's land-use code.CB 121195 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily expands how much capacity transitional homeless encampments may provide under Seattle's land-use code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127436May 28, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to land use and zoning; adopting interim provisions to expand the capacity of transitional encampments; and amending Sections 23.42.054 and 23.42.056 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $4,066. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Acquires and protects properties in the Skagit watershed for salmon recovery and habitat conservation.CB 121199 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricityCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acquires and protects properties in the Skagit watershed for salmon recovery and habitat conservation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127439June 4, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting Statutory Warranty Deeds to the Meyer Family Trust property in King County, and the Brown, Crawford for Lewis Estate, Crozier and McGown, Fulwiler, Hershaw, Ruble, Whitmore Properties LLC, Lang, and Sims properties, a Bargain and Sale Deed to the Kalkoske property, and a Quit Claim Deed to the Loney property in Skagit County, Washington, all for salmonid habitat protection purposes; ratifying acceptance of the Salmon Recovery Funding Board grants and funding for property acquisitions; declaring certain real property rights surplus and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purposes; ratifying the City’s grants of Deeds of Right to the State of Washington for the Brown, Crawford for Lewis Estate, Crozier and McGown, Fulwiler, Hershaw, Kalkoske, Loney, Whitmore Properties LLC, and Lang properties for salmon recovery and conservation purposes; placing said lands conveyed to the City under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,070,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Rezones several neighborhoods and changes development rules to expand housing and community-serving uses.CB 121196 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Rezones several neighborhoods and changes development rules to expand housing and community-serving uses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127445June 4, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to land use and zoning; rezoning certain land in the University District, the Fremont neighborhood, the Madison/Miller neighborhood, the Rainier Beach neighborhood, and the Downtown neighborhood; rezoning land and amending development standards to increase housing supply, support multi-purpose redevelopment on certain sites with community-based uses, remove code barriers to passive house, modular, and mass timber construction and to conversion from commercial space to housing in more zones, and incentivize community-serving uses along with the construction of more housing in certain areas; amending Sections 23.40.080, 23.47A.009, 23.49.008, 23.49.011, 23.49.036, 23.49.058, and 23.49.158 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Section 23.40.090 to the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Map 1L to Chapter 23.49 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 60, 76, 109, 112, and 188 of the Official Land Use Map.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $3,500. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Allows a cooperative preschool to operate the Madison Beach Park Bathhouse for ten years.CB 121212 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allows a cooperative preschool to operate the Madison Beach Park Bathhouse for ten years.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127442June 4, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent to enter into a ten-year contract with The Madison Park Cooperative Preschool to operate and provide management of the Madison Beach Park Bathhouse located at 1900 43rd Ave East.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $274,800. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Allows a cooperative preschool to operate the Victory Heights Shelterhouse for ten years.CB 121213 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allows a cooperative preschool to operate the Victory Heights Shelterhouse for ten years.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127443June 4, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent to enter into a ten-year contract with Victory Heights Cooperative Preschool to operate and provide management of the Victory Heights Shelterhouse located at 1747 NE 106th Street.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $280,800. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily pauses new or expanded data centers while Seattle develops permanent land-use rules.CB 121214 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Temporarily pauses new or expanded data centers while Seattle develops permanent land-use rules.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127447June 11, 2026
Official sponsorsEddie Lin, Joy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to land use and zoning; introducing a new definition for data centers; adopting a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, processing, or approval of applications for the establishment or expansion of, or change of use to, data centers; amending Section 23.84A.008 of the Seattle Municipal Code; approving a work plan; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a Seattle Public Utilities contract with Waste Management to process the city's recycling.CB 121221 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid WasteProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a Seattle Public Utilities contract with Waste Management to process the city's recycling.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127451June 18, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a contract with Waste Management of Washington, Inc., to provide recycling processing services for The City of Seattle; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Seattle Parks to acquire land for permanent preservation and expansion of Delridge Native Forest.CB 121230 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTransitParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Seattle Parks to acquire land for permanent preservation and expansion of Delridge Native Forest.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127455June 26, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitParks & RecreationTrees & Habitatfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent to identify, negotiate, and acquire real property and property rights in the Delridge neighborhood of West Seattle for the permanent preservation and expansion of the Delridge Native Forest; authorizing blanket authority for future acquisition of real property in the Delridge Native Forest including property that may have connection with Sound Transit’s West Seattle Link Extension, which is expected to require park greenspace conversions; authorizing execution of purchase and sale agreements, escrow instruments, and related documents as funding is appropriated; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Places Montlake property under the Housing Office and opens a competitive process to choose its developer.CB 121237 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originNeighborhoodsProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Places Montlake property under the Housing Office and opens a competitive process to choose its developer.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127462July 8, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the Seattle Office of Housing (OH); placing acquired real property in the Montlake neighborhood under the jurisdiction of OH; authorizing OH to issue a competitive request for proposals for selection of a preferred developer and to execute and deliver a contract for transfer of land, deed, and related documents to the selected developer; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,050,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expands Seattle Transportation's authority to close public streets when needed for public safety.CB 121233 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Expands Seattle Transportation's authority to close public streets when needed for public safety.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127459July 8, 2026
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez, Rob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to closing public streets to maintain or enhance public safety; authorizing the Director of Transportation to close streets; amending Section 11.16.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle's rules for creating and managing Parking and Business Improvement Areas.Res 32207 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle's rules for creating and managing Parking and Business Improvement Areas.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 9, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution adopting updated policies regarding the establishment and management of Parking and Business Improvement Areas for The City of Seattle; and superseding Resolution 31657.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $170,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Defines the duties of Seattle's Community Crisis Responder team within the CARE Department.CB 121232 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Defines the duties of Seattle's Community Crisis Responder team within the CARE Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127466July 13, 2026
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the operations of the Community Assisted Response and Engagement Department; describing the duties of the Community Crisis Responder team; amending Section 3.15.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 3.15.064 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Allows City Light to make ten-year agreements with customers participating in transportation-electrification programs.CB 121249 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allows City Light to make ten-year agreements with customers participating in transportation-electrification programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127471July 22, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the City Light Department; authorizing ten-year agreements with customers eligible for transportation electrification programs.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Clarifies the procedures City Council follows when making land-use decisions.CB 121215 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Clarifies the procedures City Council follows when making land-use decisions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127477July 31, 2026
Official sponsorsEddie Lin
Recorded vote5 in favor · 4 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to Council land use decisions; amending Sections 23.76.050, 23.76.062, 25.05.070, 25.05.340, 25.05.455, 25.05.460. 25.05.502, and 25.05.680 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify processes for Council land use decisions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Council. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 4 opposed
Modifies Seattle's labor agreement with Professional and Technical Employees Local 17.CB 121258 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies Seattle's labor agreement with Professional and Technical Employees Local 17.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127480July 31, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding that modifies a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Professional and Technical Employees Local 17; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $135,784. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers collection of parking-meter coin revenue from Finance and Administrative Services to Seattle Transportation.CB 121264 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers collection of parking-meter coin revenue from Finance and Administrative Services to Seattle Transportation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127484August 6, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to parking payment devices coin revenue collection; amending Section 11.16.480 of the Seattle Municipal Code to transfer responsibility for the physical collection of coin revenue from parking payment devices from the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to the Seattle Department of Transportation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedTransportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily lets qualifying housing projects use a simpler design-review process or skip design review.CB 121243 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Temporarily lets qualifying housing projects use a simpler design-review process or skip design review.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127487August 6, 2026
Official sponsorsEddie Lin
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to land use and zoning; adopting temporary regulations previously in Ordinance 127309 for six months to exempt housing projects that meet Mandatory Housing Affordability requirements using on-site performance units from Design Review, and allowing permit applicants for all housing subject to Full Design Review the option of complying with Design Review pursuant to Administrative Design review; temporarily suspending mandatory, and allowing voluntary, design review of proposed development in Titles 23 and 25 of the Seattle Municipal Code, consistent with Chapter 333, Laws of 2023 and previously in Ordinance 127309; and amending Sections 23.41.002 and 23.41.004 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle's policy for enforcing laws against knowing possession and public use of controlled substances.CB 121248 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle's policy for enforcing laws against knowing possession and public use of controlled substances.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127485August 6, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to controlled substances; updating City policy for the enforcement of the crimes of knowing possession and use of controlled substances; amending Section 3.28.141 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 4 of Ordinance 126896.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative / City Council. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Seattle's citywide list of authorized municipal positions for 2026.CB 121262 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Seattle's citywide list of authorized municipal positions for 2026.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127483August 6, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to City employment; adopting a 2026 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Directs Seattle’s Code Reviser to make Municipal Code tables comply with federal accessibility standards.Res 32214 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originAccessibility Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Directs Seattle’s Code Reviser to make Municipal Code tables comply with federal accessibility standards.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 21, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Accessibility
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution requesting the Code Reviser to reformat tables within the Seattle Municipal Code to comply with federal accessibility guidelines.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Adds written agreements, leave protections, recordkeeping, and termination notice requirements for domestic workers.CB 121266 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adds written agreements, leave protections, recordkeeping, and termination notice requirements for domestic workers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127508September 21, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to domestic worker labor standards in Seattle; amending Sections 14.23.010, 14.23.020, and 14.23.095 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding new Sections 14.23.025, 14.23.127, and 14.23.128 to the Seattle Municipal Code, to: establish written agreement requirement; establish protections for entitled paid and unpaid leave, including retaliation protection for taking permissible time off; require hiring entities to create and retain records; add advance notice of termination requirement; update remedies provisions; and conform to certain changes in state law and with City labor standards.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $9,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Labor Standards. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Clarifies how assessments may increase within the Ballard Business Improvement Area.CB 121270 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Clarifies how assessments may increase within the Ballard Business Improvement Area.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127505September 21, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the Ballard Business Improvement Area; amending Section 6 of Ordinance 126911 to clarify provisions on assessment escalations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expands Seattle’s civil-rights definition of sexual orientation to cover additional identities and consensual relationship structures.CB 121278 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Expands Seattle’s civil-rights definition of sexual orientation to cover additional identities and consensual relationship structures.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127507September 21, 2026
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to civil rights protections for diverse sexual orientations and relationship structures; amending the definition of the sexual orientation protected class to recognize gender identities outside the gender binary, recognize pansexuality and asexuality as orientations, and include consensual relationships with multiple partners as an element of attitudes, preferences, and practices pertaining to sexual orientation; and amending Sections 3.14.910, 3.14.931, 4.80.020, 6.02.270, 6.202.230, 14.04.030, 14.06.020, 14.08.020, 14.11.020, and 18.12.280 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renews Seattle’s lease with the U.S. Army for interim use of 33.95 acres at Fort Lawton.CB 121295 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renews Seattle’s lease with the U.S. Army for interim use of 33.95 acres at Fort Lawton.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127513September 24, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property lease renewal with the United States Army for The City of Seattle’s continued interim use and occupancy of 33.95 acres at the Fort Lawton Army Reserve Center.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,401,638. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Limits police use of less-lethal tools for crowd management to imminent safety threats.CB 120916 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Limits police use of less-lethal tools for crowd management to imminent safety threats.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127182February 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; mandating that the Police Department adopt and maintain crowd management policies that prohibit the use of less lethal tools in crowd management settings unless specific facts and circumstances are occurring or about to occur that create an imminent risk of physical injury to any person or significant property damage; and repealing Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code and Ordinance 126422.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Temporarily allows residential uses in the Stadium Transition Area Overlay District.CB 120933 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Temporarily allows residential uses in the Stadium Transition Area Overlay District.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127191March 27, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.74.002 and 23.74.008 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow residential uses in the Stadium Transition Area Overlay District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Protects access to reproductive and gender-affirming care and limits City cooperation with outside investigations.CB 120950 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originPublic Health Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Protects access to reproductive and gender-affirming care and limits City cooperation with outside investigations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127194March 31, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Public Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to reaffirming The City of Seattle as a Welcoming City; supporting access to reproductive health care services and gender-affirming treatment in Seattle; extending the responsibility of City employees to protect the provision of reproductive health care services and gender-affirming treatment; and adding a new Chapter 14.115 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily eases zoning rules for occupying street-level spaces in three urban centers.CB 120771 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily eases zoning rules for occupying street-level spaces in three urban centers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127198April 10, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adopting interim provisions to facilitate occupancy of street-level spaces in the Downtown, South Lake Union, and Uptown Urban Centers; adding a new Section 23.42.041 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 23.42.108, 23.48.005, 23.48.020, 23.48.040, 23.48.240, 23.48.740, 23.49.009, 23.49.011, 23.76.004, and 23.76.006, and Downtown Overlay Maps 1G and 1J in Chapter 23.49 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Construction and Inspections. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a new master plan and zoning for UW Medical Center–Northwest.CB 120963 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts a new master plan and zoning for UW Medical Center–Northwest.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127197April 10, 2025
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adopting a new Major Institution Master Plan for the University of Washington Medical Center - Northwest Hospital; and amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at Page 14 of the Official Land Use Map, to modify height limits and rezone property within the Major Institution Overlay (Project Number 3040282-LU, Clerk File 314511).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a contract rezone for housing development at 8601 Fremont Avenue North.CB 120962 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves a contract rezone for housing development at 8601 Fremont Avenue North.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127200April 18, 2025
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 26 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the property at 8601 Fremont Avenue N from Neighborhood Residential 3 to Lowrise 2 with a M1 Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (LR2 (M1)); and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Application of Blair Stone/Encore Architects, C.F. 314491, SDCI Project 3036119-LU)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Eases zoning barriers to building and using accessory dwelling units.CB 120949 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Eases zoning barriers to building and using accessory dwelling units.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127211May 7, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; expanding housing options by easing barriers to the construction and use of accessory dwelling units as required by state legislation; amending Sections 22.205.010, 23.22.062, 23.24.045, 23.44.011, 23.44.014, 23.44.016, 23.44.017, 23.44.046, 23.45.512, 23.45.514, 23.45.545, 23.84A.008, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.038, 23.90.018, and 23.90.019 of the Seattle Municipal Code; repealing Sections 23.40.035 and 23.44.041 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding new Sections 23.42.022 and 23.53.003 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts interim zoning changes required by state housing laws and plans permanent rules.CB 120969 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts interim zoning changes required by state housing laws and plans permanent rules.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127219May 28, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; implementing interim controls to comply with various state laws; establishing findings and adopting a workplan for permanent legislation; amending Sections 23.22.062, 23.24.045, 23.34.011, 23.44.006, 23.44.010, 23.44.011, 23.44.012, 23.44.014, 23.44.016, 23.44.017, 23.44.044, 23.45.512, 23.45.514, 23.45.518, 23.45.522, 23.45.527, 23.45.529, 23.53.006, 23.53.025, 23.54.015, 23.54.020, 23.54.030, 23.84A.010, 23.84A.025, 23.84A.036, and 25.09.240 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning & Community Development (OPCD). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Conceptually approves interactive media kiosks in downtown and participating business improvement areas.Res 32170 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conceptually approves interactive media kiosks in downtown and participating business improvement areas.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 6, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to the Downtown Seattle Association to install, maintain, and operate interactive media kiosks in public places located in the Metropolitan Improvement District and in participating Business Improvement Areas.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to establish infrastructure assessment reimbursement areas.CB 120967 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to establish infrastructure assessment reimbursement areas.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127224June 6, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to develop municipal assessment reimbursement area authority, in accordance with chapter 35.91 of the Revised Code of Washington; adding a new Subtitle VI to Title 21 of the Seattle Municipal Code; renumbering Chapter 21.80 of the Seattle Municipal Code to Chapter 21.63; relocating the chapter into Subtitle VI of Title 21; and further amending the chapter.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $120,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adds Seattle Public Utilities funding and positions to the adopted 2025 budget.CB 120968 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adds Seattle Public Utilities funding and positions to the adopted 2025 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127225June 6, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program; changing appropriations to Seattle Public Utilities and its budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and creating positions; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,154,731. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises how complaints against Seattle’s Chief of Police are investigated and overseen.CB 120977 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPoliceGovernment Accountability Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Revises how complaints against Seattle’s Chief of Police are investigated and overseen.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127226June 6, 2025
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to oversight of the police; revising the process for investigating complaints naming the Chief of Police; adding new Sections 3.29.515 and 3.29.590 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 3.29.510, 3.29.520, 3.29.530, 3.29.560, and 3.29.570 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes City Light’s long-term fiber-sharing agreement with Ziply Fiber.CB 120986 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes City Light’s long-term fiber-sharing agreement with Ziply Fiber.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127237June 23, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the execution of an indefeasible right of use fiber sharing agreement with Ziply Fiber Pacific, LLC for an effective period of up to two 15-year terms.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a $2 million bridge loan to the Seattle Social Housing Developer.CB 121012 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originBridges & StructuresAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a $2 million bridge loan to the Seattle Social Housing Developer.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127246July 10, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Seattle Social Housing Developer; authorizing the Director of Finance to enter into a loan agreement with the Seattle Social Housing Developer; authorizing a loan of funds in an amount up to $2,000,000 from the General Fund as bridge financing to be repaid from future tax proceeds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a civil action and restitution requirement for illegal graffiti.CB 120995 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates a civil action and restitution requirement for illegal graffiti.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127250July 18, 2025
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle, Sara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a new civil cause of action against graffiti taggers for illegal graffiti on public and private property and requiring restitution; adding a new Section 10.07.055 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 10.07.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Expands chronic-nuisance property rules, penalties, and available City remedies.CB 121006 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expands chronic-nuisance property rules, penalties, and available City remedies.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127249July 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle, Rob Saka
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to chronic nuisance properties; allowing, under certain circumstances, an off-property nuisance activity to count toward determining that a property is a chronic nuisance; increasing penalties; clarifying the City’s remedies relating to chronic nuisance properties; amending Sections 10.09.010, 10.09.030, 10.09.050, 10.09.060, and 10.09.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes a five-year agreement to operate Green Lake Pitch and Putt.CB 121038 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a five-year agreement to operate Green Lake Pitch and Putt.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127261August 5, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a five-year agreement, with options to extend, with Lost Evenings to operate and provide management of the Green Lake Pitch & Putt at Green Lake Park.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $26,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Corrects the duration of Seattle business-and-occupation tax rates.CB 121059 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Corrects the duration of Seattle business-and-occupation tax rates.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127267August 12, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 127259 to correct a technical error on the duration of business and occupation tax rates; and amending Section 5.55.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLAW. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle’s procedures for dividing land into subdivisions.CB 121009 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates Seattle’s procedures for dividing land into subdivisions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127271August 14, 2025
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.22.024, 23.22.064, 23.22.066, 23.22.070, 23.22.072, 23.22.074, and 23.22.078 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Subchapter IV of Chapter 23.22, consisting of Sections 23.22.082, 23.22.084, 23.22.086, and 23.22.088, of the Seattle Municipal Code to update subdivision procedures.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates solid-waste storage and access requirements for new development.CB 121005 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentSolid Waste Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates solid-waste storage and access requirements for new development.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127285September 5, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentSolid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; updating and clarifying requirements for solid waste storage, staging areas, and access for residential, commercial, and industrial development; adding new requirements for Neighborhood Residential and industrial zones; updating provisions for alternative arrangements to meet requirements; and amending Sections 23.49.025, 23.54.040, and 23.84A.036 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes The Kite Cafe to operate concessions at Golden Gardens Park.CB 121036 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes The Kite Cafe to operate concessions at Golden Gardens Park.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127282September 5, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute for and on behalf of The City of Seattle a concession agreement granting The Kite Cafe LLC the right to exclusive use and occupancy of the Golden Gardens Bathhouse Concession Premises for the purpose of providing food and concessions for park patrons at Golden Gardens Park.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Magnuson Brewing to operate food and beverage concessions at Magnuson Park.CB 121056 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Magnuson Brewing to operate food and beverage concessions at Magnuson Park.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127283September 5, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into a Concession Agreement with Magnuson Brewing, LLC, to occupy and use a portion of the North Shore Recreation Area at Warren G. Magnuson Park to provide food and beverage concessions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $969,223. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates small-public-works contracting and bond procedures to match state law.CB 121046 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates small-public-works contracting and bond procedures to match state law.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127289September 11, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to public works contracts; amending provisions of the small works roster and contractor bond processes to align with state law; and amending Sections 20.40.020 and 20.48.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $350,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Rezones land in Seattle’s Lake City neighborhood for future development.CB 121049 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Rezones land in Seattle’s Lake City neighborhood for future development.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127290September 11, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) at page 8 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the Lake City neighborhood.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning & Community Development (OPCD). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle side-sewer regulations, fees, requirements, and definitions.CB 121037 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle side-sewer regulations, fees, requirements, and definitions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127294September 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; updating side sewer regulations to conform to current standards, clarify existing requirements, allow side sewer fees to be created by Director’s Rule, and update definitions; renumbering existing subsections 21.16.240.B and 21.16.240.C of the Seattle Municipal Code as Section 21.16.241 and further amending the section; amending Sections 21.16.030, 21.16.040, 21.16.070, 21.16.077, 21.16.140, 21.16.240, and 21.16.270 of the Seattle Municipal Code; renumbering existing and repealing Sections 21.16.071 and 21.16.350 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves City Light’s 2026–2027 conservation target and ten-year conservation potential.Res 32176 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricity Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves City Light’s 2026–2027 conservation target and ten-year conservation potential.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving the City Light Department’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2026-2027 and ten-year conservation potential.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes City Light programs and incentives that shift customer electricity use.CB 121063 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes City Light programs and incentives that shift customer electricity use.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127296September 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Department to develop programs, enter into agreements with customers and other parties, and provide incentives for modifications to customer electricity consumption; and amending Section 21.49.130 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves updated surveillance reports and uses for police camera systems.CB 121052 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves updated surveillance reports and uses for police camera systems.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127297September 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2025 updated surveillance impact report and 2025 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department's use of Closed-Circuit Television Camera Systems.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Approves updated surveillance reports and uses for police real-time crime-center software.CB 121053 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves updated surveillance reports and uses for police real-time crime-center software.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127298September 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2025 updated surveillance impact report and 2025 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department's use of Real-Time Crime Center software.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Narrows when substantial building alterations are required under Seattle construction codes.CB 121047 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Narrows when substantial building alterations are required under Seattle construction codes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127299September 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMark Solomon, Sara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s construction codes; limiting the areas for which substantial alterations are required to spaces or buildings greater than 7,000 square feet in gross area; amending existing substantial alteration requirements; and amending Section 311 of the Seattle Existing Building Code, adopted by Ordinance 127108.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land-use permit review timelines and Council quasi-judicial procedures.CB 121045 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates land-use permit review timelines and Council quasi-judicial procedures.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127300September 24, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; updating timelines for City review of land use permits; amending Sections 23.76.005 and 23.76.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Resolution 31602 to update the City Council Rules for Quasi-Judicial Proceedings.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Corrects a franchisee’s name in two existing railroad-franchise ordinances.CB 121023 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Corrects a franchisee’s name in two existing railroad-franchise ordinances.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127313September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to railroad franchises; amending Sections 1 and 3 of Ordinances 126969 and 126970 to correct an error in the name of a franchisee.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Creates the Roots to Roofs development-bonus pilot program for housing.CB 121011 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates the Roots to Roofs development-bonus pilot program for housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127308September 26, 2025
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; establishing the Roots to Roofs Bonus Pilot Program; and adding new Sections 23.40.090 through 23.40.097 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $90,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates operating, parking, and loading rules for e-cargo bicycle deliveries.CB 121040 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTraffic Safety Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates operating, parking, and loading rules for e-cargo bicycle deliveries.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127314September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to new vehicle types and curb allowances for e-cargo bicycle delivery; establishing a new vehicle type for e-cargo bikes; establishing rules for operations, parking, and loading for e-cargo bicycle delivery; clarifying new curb allowances for e-cargo bike delivery; and adding new Sections 11.23.430 and 11.44.300 to, and amending Sections 11.14.055, 11.23.120, 11.31.121, and 11.76.015 of, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates municipal-code references governing legally valid unsworn declarations.CB 121082 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates municipal-code references governing legally valid unsworn declarations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127303September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to unsworn declarations; updating references to state law on unsworn declarations by amending all references to RCW 9A.72.085 to chapter 5.50 RCW; and amending Sections 6.430.040, 6.500.170, 6.600.120, 7.24.130, 8.37.220, 8.38.220, 10.52.035, 14.16.050, 14.16.070, 14.16.105, 14.17.045, 14.17.080, 14.19.050, 14.19.070, 14.19.105, 14.20.030, 14.20.050, 14.20.085, 14.21.050, 14.22.065, 14.22.085, 14.22.120, 14.23.085, 14.23.120, 14.26.150, 14.26.220, 14.27.150, 14.27.220, 14.28.150, 14.28.220, 14.29.150, 14.29.220, 14.30.120, 14.30.190, 14.33.110, 14.33.150, 14.33.220, 14.34.150, 14.34.220, 15.91.004, 15.91.012, 18.12.278, 22.212.110, 23.91.012, 25.08.900, and 25.08.940 of the Seattle Municipal Code and Section 112 of the Seattle Fire Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLaw. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily streamlines design review for housing projects meeting affordability requirements.CB 121048 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily streamlines design review for housing projects meeting affordability requirements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127309September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adopting temporary regulations to exempt housing projects that meet Mandatory Housing Affordability requirements using on-site performance units from Design Review, and allowing permit applicants for all housing subject to Full Design Review the option of complying with Design Review pursuant to Administrative Design review; temporarily suspending and allowing voluntary design review of proposed development in Titles 23 and 25 of the Seattle Municipal Code, consistent with Chapter 333, Laws of 2023; and amending Section 23.41 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Construction and Inspections. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Clarifies Seattle Fire Code rules for preventable alarms and unsecured premises.CB 121071 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Clarifies Seattle Fire Code rules for preventable alarms and unsecured premises.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127302September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Fire Code; clarifying provisions relating to preventable alarms and securing of premises, and amending Sections 112, 202, 311, and 901 of the 2021 Seattle Fire Code as adopted by Section 22.600.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code and as regulated and allowed by the State Building Code Act, chapter 19.27 of the Revised Code of Washington.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSFD. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Changes assessment exemptions for the West Seattle Junction business improvement area.CB 121060 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changes assessment exemptions for the West Seattle Junction business improvement area.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127306September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the West Seattle Junction Parking and Business Improvement Area; modifying the exemptions to the Levy of Special Assessment; and amending Ordinance 113326, as previously amended by Ordinances 115997, 119539, 120570, 121758, 125152, and 127103.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the structure and procedures of the Office of City Auditor.CB 121072 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the structure and procedures of the Office of City Auditor.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127305September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to updating the structure and processes of the Office of City Auditor; amending Chapter 3.40 and Sections 14.08.040 and 14.08.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 15.52.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Auditor. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a contract rezone allowing greater building height at 352 Roy Street.CB 121074 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves a contract rezone allowing greater building height at 352 Roy Street.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127310September 26, 2025
Official sponsorsMark Solomon
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 100 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone parcels located at 352 Roy Street from Seattle Mixed Uptown with a 65 foot height limit and M Mandatory Housing Affordability suffix (SM-UP 65 (M)) to Seattle Mixed Uptown with an 85 foot height limit and M Mandatory Housing Affordability suffix (SM-UP 85 (M)); and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreements as a condition of rezone approval. (Application of Kamiak Real Estate LLC, C.F. 314534, SDCI Project 3041336-LU)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renews and updates Seattle’s multifamily housing property-tax exemption program.CB 121055 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renews and updates Seattle’s multifamily housing property-tax exemption program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127316October 15, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program; renewing and modifying the Program, including to make changes in conformity with state law; repealing Chapter 5.72 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Chapter 5.73 and Sections 5.75.090 and 23.50A.062 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Removes Seattle’s residency requirement for temporary municipal court judges.CB 121064 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Removes Seattle’s residency requirement for temporary municipal court judges.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127326October 16, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to removing the City residency requirement for judges pro tempore in Seattle; amending Section 3.33.140 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Municipal Court. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Seattle’s citywide list of authorized municipal positions for 2025.CB 121077 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Seattle’s citywide list of authorized municipal positions for 2025.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127320October 16, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adopting a 2025 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle civil-infraction laws to match state law and makes technical corrections.CB 121079 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle civil-infraction laws to match state law and makes technical corrections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127323October 16, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s civil infraction code; conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and making technical corrections; and amending Sections 16.64.040 and 21.36.922 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $125. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLaw – Criminal. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle criminal laws to match state law and makes technical corrections.CB 121080 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle criminal laws to match state law and makes technical corrections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127324October 16, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and making technical corrections; adding a new Section 12A.06.095 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Sections 3.33.020, 12A.06.187, 12A.06.195, 12A.09.020, 12A.12.040, 12A.14.075, and 12A.14.170 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 12A.06.045, 12A.08.120, and 12A.08.130 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle traffic laws to match state law and makes technical corrections.CB 121081 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle traffic laws to match state law and makes technical corrections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127325October 16, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s traffic code; conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and making technical corrections; and amending Sections 11.22.080, 11.31.050, and 11.58.005 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLaw – Criminal. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Prohibits property restrictions that prevent sites from operating as grocery stores or pharmacies.CB 121094 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Prohibits property restrictions that prevent sites from operating as grocery stores or pharmacies.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127329October 29, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; prohibiting negative use restrictions that limit a property’s use as a grocery store or pharmacy; adding a new Section 23.42.140 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Sections 23.90.004 and 23.90.018 of the Seattle Municipal Code; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Raises the threshold requiring out-of-city businesses to obtain a Seattle tax certificate.CB 121114 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Raises the threshold requiring out-of-city businesses to obtain a Seattle tax certificate.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127351November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; increasing the threshold above which an out-of-city business must obtain a business license tax certificate, pursuant to changes in the state model ordinance on general business license requirements; and amending Section 5.55.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOCF. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Transfers the Major Institutions and Schools program to the planning department.CB 121092 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers the Major Institutions and Schools program to the planning department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127358November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to administration of the Major Institutions and Schools program; transferring administration of Major Institutions and Schools program from the Department of Neighborhoods to the Office of Planning and Community Development; amending Sections 23.69.032, 23.78.002, 23.78.006, 23.78.010, 23.78.012, 23.78.014, 23.79.004, and 23.79.006 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $184,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed1 not voting
Replaces Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan with updated policies, goals, and a future land-use map.CB 120985 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Replaces Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan with updated policies, goals, and a future land-use map.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127375December 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; repealing and replacing the Seattle Comprehensive Plan pursuant to a major update, with new goals, policies, and elements and a new Future Land Use Map; amending Sections 5.72.020, 5.72.030, 5.73.030, 6.600.040, 22.805.070, 23.34.007, 23.34.008, 23.34.009, 23.34.010, 23.34.011, 23.34.012, 23.34.014, 23.34.018, 23.34.020, 23.34.024, 23.34.028, 23.34.074, 23.34.076, 23.34.078, 23.34.080, 23.34.082, 23.34.086, 23.34.099, 23.34.100, 23.34.108, 23.34.110, 23.34.128, 23.40.070, 23.41.004, 23.41.012, 23.42.058, 23.44.019, 23.45.509, 23.45.510, 23.45.514, 23.45.516, 23.45.527, 23.45.530, 23.45.532, 23.45.550, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.005, 23.47A.008, 23.47A.009, 23.47A.012, 23.47A.013, 23.48.002, 23.48.021, 23.48.220, 23.48.221, 23.48.225, 23.48.245, 23.48.250, 23.48.285, 23.48.290, 23.48.602, 23.48.605, 23.48.610, 23.48.623, 23.48.690, 23.48.710, 23.48.720, 23.48.723, 23.48.740, 23.48.780, 23.48.785, 23.48.802, 23.48.905, 23.48.940, 23.49.012, 23.49.019, 23.49.036, 23.50.012, 23.50A.040, 23.50A.190, 23.50A.360, 23.51A.004, 23.52.004, 23.52.008, 23.53.006, 23.54.015, 23.54.016, 23.54.020, 23.54.035, 23.58A.014, 23.58A.024, 23.58A.040, 23.58A.042, 23.58B.040, 23.58B.050, 23.58C.040, 23.58C.050, 23.69.022, 23.69.026, 23.69.035, 23.71.020, 23.74.002, 23.84A.025, 23.84A.026, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.038, 23.84A.040, 23.84A.042, 23.86.006, 25.05.164, 25.05.665, and 25.05.800 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending the title of Sections 23.48.230, 23.48.235, 23.48.240, 23.48.255, and 23.48.280 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Changes which City positions are covered by the civil service system.CB 121141 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changes which City positions are covered by the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127373December 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; exempting positions from the civil service system; returning positions to the civil service system; and amending Section 4.13.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $49,077. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adds General Fund appropriations for food programs and financial reserves.CB 121126 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adds General Fund appropriations for food programs and financial reserves.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127369December 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson, Dan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget; making appropriations from the General Fund for food programs and reserves; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requires political consultants to disclose their work before providing consulting services in Seattle.CB 121130 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requires political consultants to disclose their work before providing consulting services in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127379December 29, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Ethics Code; establishing reporting and disclosure requirements for political consultants; prohibiting political consultants from providing political consulting services without reporting; adding a new Section 4.16.072 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 4.16.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $248,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Rezones 1620 16th Avenue for taller neighborhood-commercial development with affordability requirements.CB 120737 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Rezones 1620 16th Avenue for taller neighborhood-commercial development with affordability requirements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126990January 26, 2024
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 111 and 112 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the property at 1620 16th Avenue from Lowrise 3 with an M Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (LR3 (M)) to Neighborhood Commercial 3 with a 65-foot height limit and M1 Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (NC3-65 (M1)); and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Application of Daniel Goddard, Weinstein A+U, C.F. 314400, SDCI Project 3030517-LU)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes five years of ecological thinning and log sales in the Cedar River Watershed.CB 120725 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes five years of ecological thinning and log sales in the Cedar River Watershed.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126998March 7, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Cedar River Watershed; authorizing five years of ecological thinning, in accordance with the Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan and Forest Management Plan, in Sections 13, 19, 20, and 21, Township 22, North, Range 7, East, W.M., Sections 1, 3, 4, 8, and 17, Township 22, North, Range 8, East, W.M., Section 3, Township 21, North, Range 8, East, Section 11, Township 21, North, Range 9, East, Sections 30 and 32, Township 22, North, Range 10, East, and Sections 4, 9, and 11, Township 21, North, Range 10, East, W.M.; declaring the logs resulting from ecological thinning to be surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of such logs pursuant to applicable City contracting and surplus property sale procedures; and directing deposit of the proceeds therefrom to the Water Fund for the purposes of the Habitat Conservation Plan and Forest Management Plan implementation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts economic-development grants and adjusts 2024 departmental appropriations.CB 120747 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentEconomic DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts economic-development grants and adjusts 2024 departmental appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127002April 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentEconomic DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of the Office of Economic Development to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development (OED). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves City Light's 2024–2025 conservation target and ten-year conservation potential.Res 32134 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricity Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves City Light's 2024–2025 conservation target and ten-year conservation potential.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 16, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving the City Light Department’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2024-2025 and ten-year conservation potential.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Allows ten additional feet of building height in part of Georgetown's commercial zone.CB 120749 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allows ten additional feet of building height in part of Georgetown's commercial zone.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127025May 22, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.47A.012 of the Seattle Municipal Code to provide a 10-foot height limit exception in commercial zones in a portion of the Georgetown neighborhood.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning & Community Development (OPCD). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Fire Code authority for emergency abatement of unsafe buildings.CB 120777 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Fire Code authority for emergency abatement of unsafe buildings.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127037June 6, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to unsafe building abatement; amending Section 111 and Section 202 of the 2018 Seattle Fire Code as adopted by Section 22.600.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code and as regulated and allowed by the State Building Code Act, Chapter 19.27 of the Revised Code of Washington; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Fire Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets implementation and reporting direction for programs funded by the 2024 Transportation Levy.Res 32137 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets implementation and reporting direction for programs funded by the 2024 Transportation Levy.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 10, 2024
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to transportation; accompanying an ordinance requesting the 2024 Transportation Levy for citywide transportation maintenance and improvements, and providing further direction regarding reporting and implementation of the programs to be funded by the levy.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates development-code provisions for converting nonresidential buildings into housing.CB 120761 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates development-code provisions for converting nonresidential buildings into housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127054July 11, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to conversions of existing nonresidential structures to residential use; adding a new Section 23.40.080 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates criminal, traffic, and civil penalties for unlawful street racing events.CB 120806 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates criminal, traffic, and civil penalties for unlawful street racing events.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127056July 18, 2024
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle, Tanya Woo
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street racing; adding the crime of racing; adding the traffic infraction of vehicle participation in unlawful racing; adding the civil infraction of attendance at an unlawful race event; adding a new Section 11.58.440 to the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Section 12A.12.050 to, and amending Sections 11.20.230, 11.31.020, 11.31.121, 11.56.120, and 12A.09.020 of, the Seattle Municipal Code; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Funds a South Park interim flood-preparedness program through an agreement with King County.CB 120807 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originZoningParks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Funds a South Park interim flood-preparedness program through an agreement with King County.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127057July 23, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningParks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities, or designee, to execute an agreement between Seattle Public Utilities and the King County Flood Control Zone District for the South Park Interim Flood Preparedness and Response Program; amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget; changing appropriations to Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,041,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Aligns Seattle's legal definitions for cannabis businesses with state law.CB 120781 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Aligns Seattle's legal definitions for cannabis businesses with state law.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127059July 25, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE updating definitions in the Seattle Municipal Code related to cannabis businesses to align with state law; and amending Section 6.500.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Allows electric-vehicle charging stations to submeter City Light electricity.CB 120840 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allows electric-vehicle charging stations to submeter City Light electricity.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127075September 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Section 21.49.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code to authorize electric vehicle charging stations to submeter electricity.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the City's 2024 list of authorized positions.CB 120847 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the City's 2024 list of authorized positions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127079September 12, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adopting a 2024 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts King County conservation funding for parks, open space, water, and drainage projects.CB 120843 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts King County conservation funding for parks, open space, water, and drainage projects.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127087September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds; authorizing the Mayor or designee to enter into Amendments 2, 3, and 4 to the Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between King County and The City of Seattle for Open Space Acquisition Projects; and authorizing the deposit of 2024 allocations from King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds into The City of Seattle’s Park and Recreation Fund, Water Fund, and Drainage and Wastewater Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,822,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption program through March 2025.CB 120817 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption program through March 2025.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127084September 24, 2024
Official sponsorsCathy Moore
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program; amending Section 5.73.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code to extend the program’s sunset date to March 31, 2025.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates prostitution-loitering crimes, exclusion zones, arrest policies, and violation penalties.CB 120836 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates prostitution-loitering crimes, exclusion zones, arrest policies, and violation penalties.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127086September 24, 2024
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to prostitution; creating the crimes of prostitution loitering and promoting loitering for the purpose of prostitution; establishing policies governing arrests for prostitution and prostitution loitering; creating Stay Out of Area of Prostitution (SOAP) zones and providing for both the issuance of court orders relating to those zones and administration of those zones; creating the gross misdemeanor of violating a SOAP order; and adding new Sections 12A.10.010, 12A.10.030, and 12A.10.040 and a new Chapter 12A.11 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Makes technical corrections and minor clarifications throughout Seattle's land-use code.CB 120823 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Makes technical corrections and minor clarifications throughout Seattle's land-use code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127099October 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments; amending Sections 23.22.066, 23.22.100, 23.24.010, 23.28.020, 23.34.009, 23.34.093, 23.40.002, 23.41.004, 23.41.012, 23.42.058, 23.42.060, 23.42.130, 23.44.014, 23.44.016, 23.44.020, 23.44.041, 23.45.510, 23.45.516, 23.45.528, 23.45.529, 23.45.545, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.010, 23.47A.011, 23.47A.020, 23.48.005, 23.48.225, 23.48.720, 23.49.002, 23.49.008, 23.49.025, 23.49.042, 23.49.058, 23.49.090, 23.49.142, 23.49.162, 23.49.300, 23.49.320, 23.49.338, 23.50.002, 23.50.012, 23.50.044, 23.53.006, 23.53.015, 23.53.030, 23.54.015, 23.54.030, 23.55.032, 23.58C.035, 23.66.110, 23.66.122, 23.66.322, 23.69.002, 23.69.032, 23.69.033, 23.69.034, 23.71.006, 23.84A.006, 23.84A.008 23.84A.016, 23.84A.025, 23.84A.030, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.038, 25.05.444, 25.05.675, 25.05.714, 25.09.045, 25.09.160, 25.11.020, 25.11.030, 25.11.040, 25.11.050, 25.11.060, 25.11.070, 25.16.080, 25.16.115, 25.16.150, 25.22.070, 25.22.135, 25.24.060, 25.28.230, and 25.28.290 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily exempts specified urban-center housing, lodging, and lab projects from design review.CB 120824 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily exempts specified urban-center housing, lodging, and lab projects from design review.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127100October 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to design review for the Downtown, Uptown, South Lake Union, and First Hill Urban Centers, a subarea adjacent to the Uptown Urban Center, and a portion of the Greater Duwamish Manufacturing and Industrial Center; adopting temporary regulations to exempt single-use and mixed-use development projects with lodging, residential, or research and development laboratory uses from design review, and allowing the Director of the Department of Construction and Inspections to grant waivers and modifications from certain development standards; and amending Sections 23.41.004, 23.41.020, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.76.010, 23.76.012, and 23.76.026 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $305,544. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Creates parking and loading rules for designated music venue zones.CB 120827 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates parking and loading rules for designated music venue zones.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127102October 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to music venue zones and their use; establishing rules for parking and loading at music venue zones; and adding new Sections 11.14.376, 11.23.425, and 11.72.255 to, and amending Sections 11.23.120, 11.23.440, 11.30.040, and 11.31.121 of, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $40,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Removes several Seattle land-use restrictions on congregate residential housing.CB 120822 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Removes several Seattle land-use restrictions on congregate residential housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127098October 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use regulations; removing restrictions on congregate residences; and amending Sections 23.42.049, 23.45.504, 23.45.508, 23.47A.004, 23.54.015, and 23.84A.032 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Responds to recommendations for long-term funding of sidewalks, pavement, and aging bridges.Res 32145 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & Structures Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Responds to recommendations for long-term funding of sidewalks, pavement, and aging bridges.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to transportation infrastructure improvement and maintenance; responding to Resolution 32137, regarding the establishment and recommendations of a Transportation Funding Task Force to develop policy and funding recommendations for long term transportation infrastructure needs, with specific focus on building out Seattle’s sidewalk network, improving existing sidewalks, improving pavement condition, and replacing or rehabilitating aging bridges.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts and updates the 2021 Seattle Fire Code and related rules.CB 120839 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts and updates the 2021 Seattle Fire Code and related rules.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127109October 11, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s technical codes; adopting the Seattle Fire Code by adopting chapters of the 2021 International Fire Code by reference, amending certain chapters of the Code, and adopting new chapters for the Code; amending Sections 3.02.125 and 22.600.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; repealing Section 1 of Ordinance 126283 and Sections 2 and 3 of Ordinance 127037; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFire. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts and updates Seattle's construction, energy, and building technical codes.CB 120832 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts and updates Seattle's construction, energy, and building technical codes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127108October 11, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s construction codes; adopting the Seattle Boiler Code, Building Code, Electrical Code, Energy Code, Existing Building Code, Fuel Gas Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, and Residential Code and chapters of the Washington Administrative Code by reference, amending certain chapters of those codes, and adopting new chapters for those codes; amending Sections 3.06.030, 5.73.020, 11.60.690, 22.101.010, and 22.502.016 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 1 of Ordinance 126278, Ordinance 126279, Ordinance 126358, and Ordinance 126508.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves Seattle Police use of closed-circuit television cameras and lifts related funding limits.CB 120844 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & BroadbandBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves Seattle Police use of closed-circuit television cameras and lifts related funding limits.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127110October 11, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceTechnology & BroadbandBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2024 surveillance impact report and 2024 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Closed-Circuit Television Camera Systems; amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 budget; and lifting a proviso.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Makes the Seattle Police officer hiring-incentive program permanent.CB 120862 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Makes the Seattle Police officer hiring-incentive program permanent.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127112October 11, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to recruitment and retention of police officers in the Seattle Police Department; making permanent a hiring incentives program in the Seattle Police Department; and amending Ordinance 126654.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed1 not voting
Moves the Fire and Police Exams Unit to the Civil Service Commissions Department.CB 120876 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Moves the Fire and Police Exams Unit to the Civil Service Commissions Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127127November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceWorkplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the civil service; transferring the function of the Fire and Police Exams Unit from the Seattle Department of Human Resources to the Civil Service Commissions Department; and amending Sections 4.04.030, 4.04.040, 4.08.070, and 4.08.110 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $60,200. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCivil Service Commissions. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Moves administration of the City's deferred-compensation plan to Seattle Retirement.CB 120881 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Moves administration of the City's deferred-compensation plan to Seattle Retirement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127132November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the organization of City government; transferring the administration of the City of Seattle Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust from the Seattle Department of Human Resources to Seattle Retirement; authorizing administrative actions necessary to carry out the intent of this ordinance; and amending Sections 4.36.070 and 4.36.505 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $555,280. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the municipal code governing Seattle Center parking charges.CB 120875 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the municipal code governing Seattle Center parking charges.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127126November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Center parking charges; amending Section 17.19.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises pet licensing, adoption, clinic, and related animal fees.CB 120877 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revises pet licensing, adoption, clinic, and related animal fees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127128November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to animal fees; adjusting and simplifying pet license fees, adoption fees, and spay and neuter clinic fees; removing guard or attack dog licenses; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to adjust animal fees by Director’s Rule; amending Sections 9.25.030, 9.25.050, 9.25.083, 9.25.100, 9.25.110, 9.25.200, 9.26.020, 9.26.050, and 9.26.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 9.25.054, 9.26.025, and 9.26.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $150,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Raises the annual license fee for recyclable-material collectors and processors.CB 120878 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Raises the annual license fee for recyclable-material collectors and processors.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127129November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Section 6.250.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code to increase the annual license fee for the recyclable materials collector/processor license.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $73,400. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Raises and reorganizes filing fees charged by the Hearing Examiner.CB 120879 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Raises and reorganizes filing fees charged by the Hearing Examiner.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127130November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Office of Hearing Examiner; increasing Hearing Examiner filing fees; reorganizing the list of fees; and amending Section 3.02.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $4,200. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Hearing Examiner. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes transfer fees for basic-life-support emergency medical transport services.CB 120889 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMS Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes transfer fees for basic-life-support emergency medical transport services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127140November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMS
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to provision of emergency medical services; authorizing transfer fees for basic life support transport services; and adding a new Subchapter VI to Chapter 3.16 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $314,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Fire Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Eliminates obsolete fees previously charged by the Seattle Police Department.CB 120891 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Eliminates obsolete fees previously charged by the Seattle Police Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127142November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; eliminating obsolete Seattle Police Department fees; and amending Section 3.28.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Eliminates gambling taxes on bingo and raffles and revises related tax administration.CB 120895 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Eliminates gambling taxes on bingo and raffles and revises related tax administration.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127144November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to gambling taxes; eliminating the gambling tax on bingo games and raffles; exempting revenues from bingo games and raffles conducted by charitable or nonprofit organizations from the business license tax; removing the monthly installment requirement for punch board and pull tab taxes; and amending Sections 5.45.090, 5.52.030, and 5.55.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $96,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates or removes obsolete Council reporting requirements for executive departments.CB 120896 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates or removes obsolete Council reporting requirements for executive departments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127145November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Council requests for information from Executive departments; adjusting timing of reports provisions and removing obsolete reports; amending Section 5.73.130 of the Seattle Municipal Code, Ordinances 122424, 125602, and 126854, and Resolution 31971; repealing Section 5 of Ordinance 125556; and rescinding Section 2 of Resolution 31863, subsection 2.G of Resolution 31902, and Sections 2 and 3 of Resolution 31914.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Clarifies bonus allowances in the Living Building Pilot Program.CB 120833 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Clarifies bonus allowances in the Living Building Pilot Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127163December 13, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending subsection 23.49.156.A of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify bonus allowances in the Living Building Pilot Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes Verizon to install and operate wireless infrastructure at Seattle Center.CB 120917 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Verizon to install and operate wireless infrastructure at Seattle Center.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127165December 19, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; authorizing the execution of a Wireless Network Infrastructure Provider License Agreement with Verizon Wireless to design, install, operate, maintain, and upgrade a wireless communications system at Seattle Center.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,927,099. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amends the Chihuly Garden and Glass lease with extension options and revised rent.CB 120918 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originTenant ProtectionsArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amends the Chihuly Garden and Glass lease with extension options and revised rent.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127166December 19, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant ProtectionsArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Glass and Gardens Exhibition Lease; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute an amendment to the lease agreement between Center Art LLC and The City of Seattle to provide the tenant additional options to extend the lease term; and adjusting rent and other lease provisions.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,514,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Acquires property at 17th Avenue South and South Walker Street for a park.CB 120922 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acquires property at 17th Avenue South and South Walker Street for a park.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127168December 19, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as the 17th Ave South & South Walker Street, Seattle, Washington; authorizing acceptance of a recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a ten-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system in, across, over, along, under….CB 120481 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a ten-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system in, across, over, along, under….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126744January 9, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; approving a ten-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system in, across, over, along, under, through, and below certain designated public rights-of-way in unincorporated King County; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Making permanent the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Employer Shared Transit Stop pilot program.CB 120493 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Making permanent the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Employer Shared Transit Stop pilot program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126756January 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to use of bus and shuttle vehicle zones by private employer shuttle vehicles; making permanent the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Employer Shared Transit Stop pilot program; amending Sections 11.14.070, 11.14.567, 11.14.568, 11.14.670, 11.16.120, 11.23.034, 11.31.121, 11.72.050, 11.72.357, and 11.74.130 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adopting a Transit and Mobility Fee Schedule.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $431,960. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Center to accept non-City funds.CB 120496 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Center to accept non-City funds.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126758January 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Waterfront Park; authorizing the Director of Seattle Center to accept non-City funds; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget; and creating new positions at Seattle Center.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of the Waterfront. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending and making permanent certain temporary procedures.CB 120456 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending and making permanent certain temporary procedures.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126760February 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation review procedures; amending and making permanent certain temporary procedures; amending Sections 23.66.030, 25.12.320, 25.12.720, 25.16.100, 25.20.090, 25.21.110, 25.22.110, 25.24.070, and 25.30.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Neighborhoods (DON). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Including protections against discrimination based on an individual’s caste.CB 120511 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Including protections against discrimination based on an individual’s caste.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126767February 24, 2023
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to human rights; including protections against discrimination based on an individual’s caste; making technical amendments; and amending Sections 3.14.910, 3.14.931, 3.110.260, 4.80.020, 5.30.020, 6.02.270, 6.202.230, 14.04.020, 14.04.030, 14.04.040, 14.06.020, 14.06.030, 14.08.015, 14.08.020, 14.08.045, 14.08.070, 14.08.190, 14.10.010, 14.10.020, 14.11.020, and 18.12.280 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to….Res 32084 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to legally bind The City of Seattle with respect to certain projects for which the City seeks grant funding assistance managed through the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,206,284. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Conforming City provisions regarding weights and measures to state law.CB 120512 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conforming City provisions regarding weights and measures to state law.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126768February 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to weights and measures; conforming City provisions regarding weights and measures to state law; providing an enforcement process; updating fees; repealing requirements for weighmaster licenses; and amending Chapter 7.04 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $114,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Finance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending requirements for registered tree service providers.CB 120509 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending requirements for registered tree service providers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126777March 2, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and urban forestry; amending requirements for registered tree service providers; amending Sections 25.09.040, 25.11.020, 25.11.030, and 25.11.095 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending elements and defenses of property destruction.CB 120521 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending elements and defenses of property destruction.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126778March 14, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; amending elements and defenses of property destruction; and amending Section 12A.08.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,023. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Attorney’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77.CB 120524 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126783March 16, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective BargainingBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $472,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Clarifying the structure for the Charter position of Director of Finance.CB 120529 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Clarifying the structure for the Charter position of Director of Finance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126787March 24, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the organization of City government; clarifying the structure for the Charter position of Director of Finance; repealing Section 3.39.033 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 3.39.010, 3.39.030, 3.39.035, and 3.39.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program.CB 120516 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126792March 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program; amending Section 5.73.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow extension of tax exemptions scheduled to expire at the end of 2023; and amending Section 5.73.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code to extend the program’s sunset date to December 31, 2024.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the Race and Social Justice Initiative as City policy.CB 120525 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originGovernment AccountabilityCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes the Race and Social Justice Initiative as City policy.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126799April 21, 2023
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Government AccountabilityCivil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing the Race and Social Justice Initiative as City policy; establishing governance of the Race and Social Justice Initiative within the Office for Civil Rights; authorizing the Office for Civil Rights to lead the Race and Social Justice Initiative; and adding new Sections 3.14.941 through 3.14.945 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes The City of Seattle to enter into a non-government agreement with The Baseball Club of Seattle, LLLP, for the purposes of….CB 120546 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes The City of Seattle to enter into a non-government agreement with The Baseball Club of Seattle, LLLP, for the purposes of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126802April 27, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing The City of Seattle to enter into a non-government agreement with The Baseball Club of Seattle, LLLP, for the purposes of making improvements to the Rainier Playfield; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Limiting the amount of fees charged for late payment of rent and for notices issued to tenants.CB 120541 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Limiting the amount of fees charged for late payment of rent and for notices issued to tenants.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126803May 1, 2023
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential tenancy; limiting the amount of fees charged for late payment of rent and for notices issued to tenants; and adding a new Section 7.24.034 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $138,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Clarifying election procedures for the employee-elected members of the Civil Service Commission and Public Safety Civil Service Commission.CB 120552 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originWorkplace StandardsElections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Clarifying election procedures for the employee-elected members of the Civil Service Commission and Public Safety Civil Service Commission.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126807May 9, 2023
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace StandardsElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to civil service commissions; clarifying election procedures for the employee-elected members of the Civil Service Commission and Public Safety Civil Service Commission; and amending Sections 4.04.250 and 4.08.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,022. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the crime of Obstructing a Public Officer to include obstructing firefighters and fire department personnel.CB 120549 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMS Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the crime of Obstructing a Public Officer to include obstructing firefighters and fire department personnel.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126814May 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Andrew Lewis
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMS
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; amending the crime of Obstructing a Public Officer to include obstructing firefighters and fire department personnel; and amending Section 12A.16.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLAW. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the civil service system.CB 120578 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126824June 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Second Quarter 2023 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the civil service system; exempting positions from the civil service system; and amending Section 4.13.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of applications for the replacement of floating on-water residences that are vessels….CB 120588 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of applications for the replacement of floating on-water residences that are vessels….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126838June 16, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adopting a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of applications for the replacement of floating on-water residences that are vessels as defined by Section 23.60A.942 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adopting a work plan; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates environmental review.CB 120587 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates environmental review.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126843June 29, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to environmental review; amending Section 25.05.800 of the Seattle Municipal Code to update categorical exemptions for “infill” development consistent with changes to the State Environmental Policy Act.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use regulation of home occupations.CB 120520 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates land use regulation of home occupations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126845June 30, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use regulation of home occupations; amending Sections 23.42.050, 23.55.020, 23.55.022, 23.55.028, 23.55.030, and 23.55.036 of the Seattle Municipal Code to establish permanent provisions for home occupation businesses.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into an Agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to accept….CB 120596 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originBridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into an Agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to accept….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126848June 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into an Agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to accept and expend funds provided by WSDOT to implement the design and construction of certain recreational improvements as mitigation measures for the recreational impacts of the Portage Bay Bridge Roanoke Lid portion of the SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget, changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks & Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities, or designee, to execute an agreement between Seattle Public Utilities….CB 120598 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTransitProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities, or designee, to execute an agreement between Seattle Public Utilities….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126851June 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & Contractsfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities, or designee, to execute an agreement between Seattle Public Utilities and the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority for the ownership, operation and maintenance of stormwater facilities located at 136 NE 115th Street, in Seattle; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts temporary regulations to exempt housing projects that meet Mandatory Housing Affordability requirements using on-site performance units from Design Review, and allowing….CB 120581 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts temporary regulations to exempt housing projects that meet Mandatory Housing Affordability requirements using on-site performance units from Design Review, and allowing….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126854July 14, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Design Review for affordable housing; adopting temporary regulations to exempt housing projects that meet Mandatory Housing Affordability requirements using on-site performance units from Design Review, and allowing permit applicants for all housing subject to Full Design Review the option of complying with Design Review pursuant to Administrative Design review; amending Section 23.41.004 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adopting a work plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Construction and Inspections. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Correcting typographical and other technical errors, correcting section references, and clarifying regulations in sections that relate or may apply to low-income housing….CB 120591 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originAffordable HousingZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Correcting typographical and other technical errors, correcting section references, and clarifying regulations in sections that relate or may apply to low-income housing….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126855July 14, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; correcting typographical and other technical errors, correcting section references, and clarifying regulations in sections that relate or may apply to low-income housing and other developments with units subject to affordability restrictions; amending, adopting new, and repealing obsolete defined terms relating to affordability of and eligibility to reside in certain housing; increase consistency and clarity of provisions that relate to low-income housing and restricted units; amending a limited number of provisions, including applicability of design review and authorization to request waiver or modification of certain development standards, to facilitate development of low-income housing; amending the title of Sections 23.44.019, 23.45.550, 23.47A.040, 23.48.100, and 23.49.007, amending Sections 22.900G.015, 23.34.012, 23.34.020, 23.41.004, 23.42.055, 23.42.057, 23.42.070, 23.44.024, 23.44.034, 23.44.041, 23.45.510, 23.45.512, 23.45.516, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.005, 23.47A.013, 23.48.005, 23.48.020, 23.48.232, 23.48.605, 23.48.920, 23.49.008, 23.49.010, 23.49.012, 23.49.014, 23.49.023, 23.49.037, 23.49.041, 23.49.058, 23.49.164, 23.49.180, 23.54.015, 23.58A.002, 23.58A.003, 23.58A.004, 23.58A.014, 23.58A.024, 23.58A.042, 23.58B.010, 23.58B.020, 23.58B.025, 23.58B.040, 23.58B.050, 23.58B.060, 23.58C.020, 23.58C.025, 23.58C.030, 23.58C.040, 23.58C.050, 23.66.100, 23.66.310, 23.70.008, 23.70.010, 23.72.002, 23.72.010, 23.73.010, 23.73.016, 23.75.020, 23.75.085, 23.76.032, 23.76.060, 23.84A.002, 23.84A.016, 23.84A.024, 23.84A.025, 23.84A.030, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.038, 23.84A.040, and 23.86.007, and repealing Sections 23.49.015 and 23.49.181 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the City Light Department to evaluate the risks presented by overhead facilities on streets and alleys in the First Hill district….CB 120594 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the City Light Department to evaluate the risks presented by overhead facilities on streets and alleys in the First Hill district….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126853July 14, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to underground utility districts; authorizing the City Light Department to evaluate the risks presented by overhead facilities on streets and alleys in the First Hill district and to determine, based upon the Department’s engineering standards, whether electric facilities should be undergrounded and whether to dispose of remaining utility poles; and amending Sections 21.68.070, 21.68.090, and 21.68.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates regulations for rooftop features in the Pioneer Square Preservation District.CB 120592 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates regulations for rooftop features in the Pioneer Square Preservation District.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126857July 14, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; updating regulations for rooftop features in the Pioneer Square Preservation District; and amending Sections 23.49.008 and 23.66.140 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Removing regulatory barriers and simplifying and increasing permitting predictability for equitable development projects by modifying requirements for small institutions in residential zones.CB 120582 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Removing regulatory barriers and simplifying and increasing permitting predictability for equitable development projects by modifying requirements for small institutions in residential zones.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126858July 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss, Tammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; removing regulatory barriers and simplifying and increasing permitting predictability for equitable development projects by modifying requirements for small institutions in residential zones; and amending Sections 23.44.006, 23.44.022, 23.45.570, 23.54.015, and 23.84A.018 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development (OPCD). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Clarifying the role, governance and operating procedures of the Community Police Commission, reducing its size and geographic appointment requirements, giving it authority….CB 120608 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originPoliceCollective BargainingGovernment Accountability Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Clarifying the role, governance and operating procedures of the Community Police Commission, reducing its size and geographic appointment requirements, giving it authority….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126860July 20, 2023
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceCollective BargainingGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to civilian and community oversight of the police; clarifying the role, governance and operating procedures of the Community Police Commission, reducing its size and geographic appointment requirements, giving it authority to remove members and Executive Director for cause, and amending its stipend provisions; establishing qualifications and procedures for the Commission’s Executive Director and creating a Deputy Director; referring to the Commission’s role in collective bargaining hearings; amending Sections 3.29.010, 3.29.320, 3.29.330, 3.29.340, 3.29.350, 3.29.360, 3.29.400, and 4.04.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Ordinance 124543.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $191,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates noise in industrial shorelines.CB 120571 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates noise in industrial shorelines.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126865July 25, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to noise in industrial shorelines; amending Sections 25.08.100 and 25.08.410 of the Seattle Municipal Code to modify exterior sound limits for land in the Ballard Interbay Northend Manufacturing Industrial Center located within 200 feet of the shoreline.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR) to enter into a Concession Agreement with Sail Sand Point to occupy and….CB 120609 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR) to enter into a Concession Agreement with Sail Sand Point to occupy and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126868July 31, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR) to enter into a Concession Agreement with Sail Sand Point to occupy and use a portion of the Magnuson North Shore Recreation Area at Warren G. Magnuson Park to provide sailing and boating programs and education, short-term boat rentals, and dry boat storage.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,620,362. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras and designating restricted racing zones.CB 120600 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTraffic Safety Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras and designating restricted racing zones.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126869July 31, 2023
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Alex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Traffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras and designating restricted racing zones; amending Section 11.50.570 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 11.50.580 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes an agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle International Soccer Hosting Local Organizing Committee.CB 120623 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle International Soccer Hosting Local Organizing Committee.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126881August 14, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Federation Internationale de Football Association’s (FIFA) 2026 World Cup; authorizing an agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle International Soccer Hosting Local Organizing Committee.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a 2023 Citywide Position List.CB 120628 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2023 Citywide Position List.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126883August 14, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adopting a 2023 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Repealing the requirement for an amusement device license.CB 120619 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Repealing the requirement for an amusement device license.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126880August 14, 2023
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to amusement device licenses; repealing the requirement for an amusement device license; repealing Chapter 5.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 5.30.010, 5.30.020, 5.30.060, 5.55.010, 5.55.030, 5.55.040, 5.55.060, 5.55.150, 5.55.165, 5.55.220, 5.55.230, 6.208.020, and 6.208.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $95,550. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a 15-year agreement with Whatcom County providing for payments for general and emergency law enforcement and other governmental services provided by….CB 120636 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPoliceElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a 15-year agreement with Whatcom County providing for payments for general and emergency law enforcement and other governmental services provided by….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126886August 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing a 15-year agreement with Whatcom County providing for payments for general and emergency law enforcement and other governmental services provided by Whatcom County to the City’s Skagit Hydroelectric Project generation facilities and residents of Newhalem and Diablo; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,419,497. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Department to lease real property to and from private parties for the purpose of installing and operating electric vehicle charging….CB 120637 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Department to lease real property to and from private parties for the purpose of installing and operating electric vehicle charging….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126887August 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Department to lease real property to and from private parties for the purpose of installing and operating electric vehicle charging stations and supporting infrastructure; amending Section 21.49.130 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
To initiate a new Business Improvement Area to be known as the Ballard Improvement Area (BIA).Res 32101 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

To initiate a new Business Improvement Area to be known as the Ballard Improvement Area (BIA).

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION to initiate a new Business Improvement Area to be known as the Ballard Improvement Area (BIA).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras to increase safety.CB 120625 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTraffic Safety Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras to increase safety.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126892September 8, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras to increase safety; amending Sections 11.31.090, 11.31.121, and 11.50.570 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates financial policies for Automated Traffic Safety Camera revenue.CB 120638 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTraffic SafetyTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates financial policies for Automated Traffic Safety Camera revenue.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126893September 8, 2023
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic SafetyTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to financial policies for Automated Traffic Safety Camera revenue; amending Section 5.82.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Chapter 5.81 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding the crimes of knowing possession of a controlled substance and use of a controlled substance in a public place.CB 120645 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding the crimes of knowing possession of a controlled substance and use of a controlled substance in a public place.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126896September 20, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Andrew Lewis
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to controlled substances; adding the crimes of knowing possession of a controlled substance and use of a controlled substance in a public place; amending Section 12A.09.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 3.28.141 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedAndrew Myerberg. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Declares the property located at 6109 Phinney Avenue N (“Property”) surplus to the City’s needs.CB 120659 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the property located at 6109 Phinney Avenue N (“Property”) surplus to the City’s needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126902October 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the transfer of City real property for housing development; declaring the property located at 6109 Phinney Avenue N (“Property”) surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing transfer of the Phinney Ridge Property to Homestead Community Land Trust or its designee; authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing or the Director’s designee to execute and deliver a contract for transfer of land, deed, and related documents; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,050,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a new 12-year Business Improvement Area to be known as the Ballard Improvement Area.CB 120634 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a new 12-year Business Improvement Area to be known as the Ballard Improvement Area.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126911October 4, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Ballard Business Improvement Areas; establishing a new 12-year Business Improvement Area to be known as the Ballard Improvement Area; levying special assessments upon owners of commercial property, multifamily residential property, and mixed-use property within the area; providing for the deposit of revenues in a special account and expenditures therefrom; providing for collection of and penalties for delinquencies; providing for the establishment of a Ratepayers Advisory Board; providing for an implementation agreement with a Program Manager; disestablishing the existing Ballard Business Improvement Area that was established by Ordinance 125151 (“2017 BIA”); suspending the issuance of assessments and providing for the continuity of services under the 2017 BIA; providing for the transfer of any remaining funds from the 2017 BIA Account; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Updates vacant building monitoring and nuisance abatement.CB 120622 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates vacant building monitoring and nuisance abatement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126913October 6, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to vacant building monitoring and nuisance abatement; amending Sections 22.204.030 and 22.206.200 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending subsection 23.49.011.B of the Seattle Municipal Code to increase flexibility for lodging uses in the DMR/R 95/65 zone.CB 120631 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending subsection 23.49.011.B of the Seattle Municipal Code to increase flexibility for lodging uses in the DMR/R 95/65 zone.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126914October 6, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending subsection 23.49.011.B of the Seattle Municipal Code to increase flexibility for lodging uses in the DMR/R 95/65 zone.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning & Community Development (OPCD). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Street Use Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120642 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Street Use Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126915October 6, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending the Street Use Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $140,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedTransportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Solid Waste Code to establish an administrative enforcement process using notices of violation.CB 120661 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid Waste Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Solid Waste Code to establish an administrative enforcement process using notices of violation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126921October 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; updating the Solid Waste Code to establish an administrative enforcement process using notices of violation; adding a new Section 21.36.921 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 21.36.420, 21.36.920, and 21.36.922 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities Aurora Mendoza Akshay Iyengar. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 16 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the property at….CB 120696 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 16 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the property at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126928November 9, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 16 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the property at 1000 and 1020 NE Northgate Way from Neighborhood Commercial 3 with a 55 foot height limit and an M Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (NC3 55 (M)) to Neighborhood Commercial 3 with a 65 foot height limit and M1 Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (NC3 65 (M1)) and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Application of Andrew Kluess, Caron Architecture, C.F. 314513, SDCI Project 3037590-LU)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 112 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone parcels located at….CB 120697 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 112 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone parcels located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126927November 9, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 112 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone parcels located at 2210 East Cherry Street from Neighborhood Commercial 1 with a 40 foot height limit and M Mandatory Housing Affordability suffix (NC1-40 (M)) to Neighborhood Commercial 1 with a 65 foot height limit and M1 Mandatory Housing Affordability suffix (NC1-65 (M1)) and from Neighborhood Commercial 1 with a 40 foot height limit and M2 Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (NC1 40 (M2)) to Neighborhood Commercial 1 with a 65 foot height limit and M2 Mandatory Housing Affordability suffix (NC1-65 (M2)) and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreements as a condition of rezone approval. (Application of Acer House, LLC, C.F. 314474, SDCI Project 3037185-LU)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Adding, deleting, and revising various Seattle Fire Department permit, inspection, and development-related fees and related provisions.CB 120681 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originFire & EMSPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding, deleting, and revising various Seattle Fire Department permit, inspection, and development-related fees and related provisions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126936December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Fire Department’s services and fees; adding, deleting, and revising various Seattle Fire Department permit, inspection, and development-related fees and related provisions; and amending Sections 22.602.045, 22.602.070, and 22.900G.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $315,932. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Fire Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes department directors to accept grants, enter into revenue-backed service contracts, and carry forward related appropriations.CB 120679 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes department directors to accept grants, enter into revenue-backed service contracts, and carry forward related appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126934December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debtfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding from non-City sources; authorizing department directors to accept grants, enter into revenue-backed service contracts, and carry forward related appropriations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office Anna Hurst. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126258 to authorize forgiveness of a loan to Community Roots Housing.CB 120703 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable Housing Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126258 to authorize forgiveness of a loan to Community Roots Housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126951December 1, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to affordable housing; amending Ordinance 126258 to authorize forgiveness of a loan to Community Roots Housing.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild.CB 120720 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceParks & RecreationCollective Bargaining Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126958December 8, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote5 in favor · 2 opposed
PoliceParks & RecreationCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Officers’ Guild; establishing a premium pay for staffing special events and allowing additional flexibility in the City’s use of non-commissioned employees to staff special events; commencing a Dual Dispatch Alternative Response Pilot Project; removing the geographical limitation of park rangers to Downtown parks; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,047,350. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 2 opposed
Requiring periodic and consistent reporting and monitoring of City budgetary, financial, and fiscal policy information to the City Council and the public.CB 120716 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring periodic and consistent reporting and monitoring of City budgetary, financial, and fiscal policy information to the City Council and the public.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126962December 18, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the establishment of a Fiscal Transparency Program; requiring periodic and consistent reporting and monitoring of City budgetary, financial, and fiscal policy information to the City Council and the public; adding a new Chapter 3.140 to, and amending Sections 3.14.100 and 5.08.020 of, the Seattle Municipal Code; and requesting that the Code Reviser recodify Chapter 5.08 of the Seattle Municipal Code in Subchapter I of Chapter 3.14.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Repealing or deleting provisions intended to no longer be in effect in separating the taxicab and transportation network company industries.CB 120652 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Repealing or deleting provisions intended to no longer be in effect in separating the taxicab and transportation network company industries.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126976December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxicabs and for-hire vehicles; repealing or deleting provisions intended to no longer be in effect in separating the taxicab and transportation network company industries; conforming to changes in state law; adding a new Section 6.310.101 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending the title of Chapter 6.310 of the Seattle Municipal Code and Sections 6.310.110, 6.310.125, 6.310.130, 6.310.150, 6.310.260, 6.310.270, 6.310.325, 6.310.327, 6.310.400, 6.310.452, 6.310.455, 6.310.470, 6.310.530, 6.310.600, 6.310.605, and 6.310.610 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 6.310.120, 6.310.135, 6.310.137, 6.310.200, 6.310.210, 6.310.220, 6.310.225, 6.310.230, 6.310.240, 6.310.250, 6.310.255, 6.310.300, 6.310.310, 6.310.315, 6.310.320, 6.310.330, 6.310.340, 6.310.350, 6.310.360, 6.310.370, 6.310.380, 6.310.460, 6.310.475, 6.310.480, 6.310.500, 6.310.510, 6.310.720, and 6.310.730 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 120674 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126979December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.76.029 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow applicants for or holders of certain Master Use Permits approved for issuance between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2026 to have their Master Use Permits expire in six years; and making other minor amendments to the procedure for expiration and renewal of Master Use Permits.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Adding a new Section 15.70.040 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120658 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adding a new Section 15.70.040 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126984December 28, 2023
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to sidewalk construction and pedestrian mobility improvements; adding a new Section 15.70.040 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 120675 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126980December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.50A.008 of the Seattle Municipal Code to modify the maximum size of use limit for medical services uses in the portion of the Duwamish Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC) east of Airport Way S.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development (OPCD). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Section 5 of Ordinance 125761 to establish new appointment terms for the Central Waterfront Oversight Committee and create additional positions on….CB 120712 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originGovernment Accountability Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Section 5 of Ordinance 125761 to establish new appointment terms for the Central Waterfront Oversight Committee and create additional positions on….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126983December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Government Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Section 5 of Ordinance 125761 to establish new appointment terms for the Central Waterfront Oversight Committee and create additional positions on the Committee to expand representation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to street and sidewalk use.CB 120722 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to street and sidewalk use.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126971December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to street and sidewalk use; expanding the indemnification and hold-harmless requirements, which are currently directed toward permittees, to include all those making use of public place, as use is defined in Seattle Municipal Code 15.02.048; and amending Section 15.04.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating a portion of Northeast 48th Street, lying between 24th Avenue Northeast and the Burke Gilman Trail, in the University District, and….CB 120724 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating a portion of Northeast 48th Street, lying between 24th Avenue Northeast and the Burke Gilman Trail, in the University District, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126972December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating a portion of Northeast 48th Street, lying between 24th Avenue Northeast and the Burke Gilman Trail, in the University District, and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement outlining ongoing Petitioner obligations and responsibilities related to the Burke Gilman Trail connection, on the petition of Trinity Trailside LLC (Clerk File 314380).

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,065,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the railroad franchise granted to the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company of Washington, its successors and assigns.CB 120715 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the railroad franchise granted to the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company of Washington, its successors and assigns.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126970December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the railroad franchise granted to the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company of Washington, its successors and assigns; amending Section 2 of Ordinance 13633, as amended by Ordinances 18823 and 92572, to amend the description of certain railroad rights-of-way to reflect the termination of railroad operations north of Whatcom Yard and reconfiguration of Whatcom Yard.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the railroad franchise granted to the Oregon and Washington Railroad Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of….CB 120713 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the railroad franchise granted to the Oregon and Washington Railroad Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126969December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the railroad franchise granted to the Oregon and Washington Railroad Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Oregon, its successors and assigns; amending Section 2 of Ordinance 18030, as amended by Ordinances 26254, 30947, 75816, 77271, 92571, 117479, and 118994 to amend the description of certain railroad rights-of-way.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Fire Department’s fire prevention services.CB 120245 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMS Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Fire Department’s fire prevention services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126522January 10, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMS
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Fire Department’s fire prevention services; amending Sections 22.602.010, 22.602.020, 22.602.045, 22.602.050, 22.602.070, 22.602.090, and 3.102.010 of, repealing Sections 3.16.130 and 22.600.050 of, and adding a new Section 3.16.131 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Fire Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Stating a maximum term for permits in parks.CB 120264 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Stating a maximum term for permits in parks.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126534February 18, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to permits in parks; stating a maximum term for permits in parks; clarifying the nature of permissible commercial activities in parks; and amending Sections 18.12.030, 18.12.042, and 18.12.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts the gift of Google ad grant credits.CB 120268 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts the gift of Google ad grant credits.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126539March 1, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting the gift of Google ad grant credits; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 16 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone two parcels located….CB 120275 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 16 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone two parcels located….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126540March 1, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 16 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone two parcels located at 10735 Roosevelt Way NE from Lowrise 3 with an M Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (LR3 (M)) to Midrise with an M1 Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (MR (M1)); and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Application of Wallace Properties - Park at Northgate, LLC, C.F. 314441, SDCI Project 3033517-LU)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126474 and the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120256 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126474 and the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126544March 7, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending Ordinance 126474 and the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 2 and Section 3 of Ordinance 126339.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 120266 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126548March 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.47A.012 and 23.47A.013 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow for transfer of development potential or transfer of development rights in the NC3-200 and the NC3P-200 zones.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Seattle Police Department to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.CB 120277 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Seattle Police Department to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126549March 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Seattle Police Department to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; changing appropriations to the Seattle Police Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,323,845. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a tree service provider registration procedure and requirement.CB 120207 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adding a tree service provider registration procedure and requirement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126554April 5, 2022
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen, Dan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and urban forestry; adding a tree service provider registration procedure and requirement; adding a new Section 25.11.095 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 25.11.020, 25.11.050, 25.11.090, and 25.11.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the civil service system.CB 120292 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originZoningCompensation & BenefitsWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126558April 8, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningCompensation & BenefitsWorkplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the First Quarter 2022 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the civil service system; adjusting the pay zone structure for titles in the City’s discretionary pay programs; clarifying bereavement leave provisions; and amending the title of Chapter 4.28 and Section 4.28.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes Indigenous Peoples’ Day as a legal holiday for certain City employees and a legal parking holiday.CB 120286 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes Indigenous Peoples’ Day as a legal holiday for certain City employees and a legal parking holiday.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126559April 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; establishing Indigenous Peoples’ Day as a legal holiday for certain City employees and a legal parking holiday; authorizing memoranda of understanding between the City and certain City unions to add Indigenous Peoples’ Day and Juneteenth as a paid holiday; amending Sections 3.06.015, 3.16.131, 3.102.010, 4.20.190, 11.14.277, and 14.12.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating a portion of the alley in Block 6, A.A. Denny’s Second Addition, in the block bounded by University Street, 1st Avenue….CB 120282 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating a portion of the alley in Block 6, A.A. Denny’s Second Addition, in the block bounded by University Street, 1st Avenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126562April 19, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating a portion of the alley in Block 6, A.A. Denny’s Second Addition, in the block bounded by University Street, 1st Avenue, Seneca Street, and 2nd Avenue, in Downtown, and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement, on the petition of HS 2U Owner, LLC (Clerk File 314320).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,640,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a memorandum of understanding between the City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77….CB 120298 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a memorandum of understanding between the City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126565May 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a memorandum of understanding between the City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77 Signal Electricians to be effective January 23, 2021 to January 22, 2023; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates just cause eviction: changing the terms of certain eviction defenses.CB 120330 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates just cause eviction: changing the terms of certain eviction defenses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126593May 26, 2022
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to just cause eviction: changing the terms of certain eviction defenses; and amending Sections 22.205.090 and 22.205.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a compensation scheme for app-based workers with minimum pay requirements and related standards for transparency and flexibility.CB 120294 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a compensation scheme for app-based workers with minimum pay requirements and related standards for transparency and flexibility.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126595June 13, 2022
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Andrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to app-based worker labor standards; establishing a compensation scheme for app-based workers with minimum pay requirements and related standards for transparency and flexibility; amending Sections 3.02.125, 3.15.000, and 6.208.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Title 8 and Chapter 8.37 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $670,685. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates regulations for rooftop features.CB 120287 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates regulations for rooftop features.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126600June 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; updating regulations for rooftop features; amending Sections 23.44.012, 23.44.046, 23.45.514, 23.45.545, 23.47A.012, 23.47A.013, 23.48.025, 23.48.231, 23.49.008, 23.49.046, 23.49.096, 23.49.148, 23.49.324, 23.50.020, 23.66.140, 23.66.332, and 23.75.110 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Directors of the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections to accept a….CB 120339 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Directors of the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections to accept a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126599June 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Directors of the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections to accept a grant and execute related agreements; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $300,730. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development/Seattle Dept of Construction & Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the civil service system.CB 120347 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126605June 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Second Quarter 2022 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the civil service system; removing positions from the Civil Service system; and amending Section 4.13.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating a portion of 29th Avenue Southwest and Southwest City View Street, in West Seattle, and accepting a Property Use and Development….CB 120345 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating a portion of 29th Avenue Southwest and Southwest City View Street, in West Seattle, and accepting a Property Use and Development….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126612July 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating a portion of 29th Avenue Southwest and Southwest City View Street, in West Seattle, and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement, on the petition of NWB/CSPP West Seattle LLC (Clerk File 314357).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,090,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with Seattle Preparatory School to replace the Montlake Playfield and continue an….CB 120342 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with Seattle Preparatory School to replace the Montlake Playfield and continue an….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126610July 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Parks & RecreationYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into an agreement with Seattle Preparatory School to replace the Montlake Playfield and continue an ongoing relationship in the Montlake community consistent with the Non-Government Agreement in Attachment 1 to this ordinance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $850,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Human Services Department to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.CB 120338 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Human Services Department to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126608July 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Human Services Department to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; changing appropriations to the Human Services Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,226,147. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHSD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts amended Housing Funding Policies for housing programs and investments.CB 120343 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts amended Housing Funding Policies for housing programs and investments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126611July 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to housing for low-income households; adopting amended Housing Funding Policies for housing programs and investments; authorizing actions by the Director of Housing regarding past and future housing loans and contracts; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates City employment.CB 120351 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates City employment.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126615July 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; amending Sections 4.14.140 and 4.14.150 of the Seattle Municipal Code to expand eligibility for the moving expenses reimbursement benefit for certain individuals; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $25,049. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a memorandum of understanding between the City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union….CB 120357 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a memorandum of understanding between the City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126620July 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a memorandum of understanding between the City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 77 to be effective January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates prosecuting violations of domestic violence and other protection orders to make the Seattle Municipal Code consistent with state law.CB 120363 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates prosecuting violations of domestic violence and other protection orders to make the Seattle Municipal Code consistent with state law.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126623July 19, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to prosecuting violations of domestic violence and other protection orders to make the Seattle Municipal Code consistent with state law; amending Section 12A.09.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLaw. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Conforming the definition of “service animal” to federal and state law.CB 120335 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conforming the definition of “service animal” to federal and state law.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126627July 27, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to service animals; conforming the definition of “service animal” to federal and state law; establishing a uniform definition for “service animal” by removing similar terms and including the definition in the Parks Code; making technical corrections; and amending Sections 6.310.465, 9.25.023, 9.25.082, 11.40.180, 14.04.030, 14.06.020, 14.06.030, 14.08.015, 14.08.020, 14.08.045, 14.08.070, 14.08.190, 18.12.030, and 18.12.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Office for Civil Rights. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Defining the addition of a single development that includes residential uses at a community or technical college located within an Urban Center….CB 120313 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Defining the addition of a single development that includes residential uses at a community or technical college located within an Urban Center….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126626July 27, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; defining the addition of a single development that includes residential uses at a community or technical college located within an Urban Center as a minor amendment to an existing Major Institution master plan; amending Sections 23.42.049, 23.45.504, 23.47A.004, 23.69.008, 23.69.026, and 23.69.035 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a process for investigating complaints naming the Chief of Police.CB 120337 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPoliceGovernment Accountability Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a process for investigating complaints naming the Chief of Police.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126628July 27, 2022
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to civilian and community oversight of the police; establishing a process for investigating complaints naming the Chief of Police; adding a new subchapter V to Chapter 3.29 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 49 of Ordinance 125315 to renumber the existing Subchapter V of Chapter 3.29 and Sections 3.29.500 and 3.29.510 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Stating The City of Seattle’s intent to address climate change and improve resiliency as part of the One Seattle update to the….Res 32059 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originClimate Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Stating The City of Seattle’s intent to address climate change and improve resiliency as part of the One Seattle update to the….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 27, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Dan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Climate
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION stating The City of Seattle’s intent to address climate change and improve resiliency as part of the One Seattle update to the Comprehensive Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $895,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes requirements for food delivery platforms providing delivery services to restaurants.CB 120379 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes requirements for food delivery platforms providing delivery services to restaurants.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126639August 3, 2022
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen, Dan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to regulations of food delivery platforms; establishing requirements for food delivery platforms providing delivery services to restaurants; and amending Chapter 7.30 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $250. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a 2022 Citywide Position List.CB 120386 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2022 Citywide Position List.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126646August 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adopting a 2022 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City’s criminal code.CB 120376 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPublic Health Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates the City’s criminal code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126650August 15, 2022
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Public Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; amending Section 12A.09.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adopt the Revised Code of Washington offense Interference with Health Care Facilities or Providers.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Including protections against discrimination based on an individual’s actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes.CB 120374 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Including protections against discrimination based on an individual’s actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126649August 15, 2022
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to human rights; including protections against discrimination based on an individual’s actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes; and amending Sections 3.14.910, 3.14.931, 3.110.260, 4.80.020, 6.02.270, 6.202.230, 14.04.020, 14.04.030, 14.04.040, 14.06.020, 14.06.030, 14.08.015, 14.08.020, 14.08.045, 14.08.070, 14.08.190, 14.10.010, 14.10.020, and 18.12.280 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes social equity applicant criteria for cannabis businesses.CB 120392 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes social equity applicant criteria for cannabis businesses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126664September 19, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to licensing cannabis businesses in Seattle; establishing social equity applicant criteria for cannabis businesses; setting fees for cannabis businesses; expanding the purposes for which a cannabis license may be issued in the future; updating references in the code to “cannabis”; and amending Chapter 6.500 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of a Conservation and Recreation Easement at the Turner-Koepf House and Garden, commonly known as the Garden House, located….CB 120415 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of a Conservation and Recreation Easement at the Turner-Koepf House and Garden, commonly known as the Garden House, located….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126668September 21, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatCity Propertyfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR); authorizing the acquisition of a Conservation and Recreation Easement at the Turner-Koepf House and Garden, commonly known as the Garden House, located at 2336 15th Avenue South; authorizing acceptance of a recording of the Conservation and Recreation Easement for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments.CB 120401 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126685October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments; adding a new Section 23.45.600 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); amending Sections 22.900G.010, 23.24.040, 23.40.060, 23.41.004, 23.41.016, 23.41.018, 23.42.038, 23.42.040, 23.42.055, 23.42.106, 23.42.112, 23.44.009, 23.44.010, 23.44.011, 23.44.014, 23.44.016, 23.44.017, 23.44.018, 23.44.041, 23.45.514, 23.45.518, 23.45.524, 23.45.529, 23.47A.012, 23.47A.014, 23.48.040, 23.48.245, 23.48.620, 23.48.622, 23.48.720, 23.49.181, Map 1J for Chapter 23.49, 23.50.014, 23.50.027, 23.50.038, 23.51A.002, 23.51B.002, 23.53.006, 23.53.010, 23.54.015, 23.54.030, 23.55.002, 23.55.015, 23.55.056, 23.58B.050, 23.58D.006, 23.69.002, 23.69.032, 23.69.034, 23.71.044, 23.72.004, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.76.010, 23.76.026, 23.76.032, 23.84A.004, 23.84A.010, 23.84A.016, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.048, 23.86.006, 23.88.020, 25.05.680, 25.09.012, 25.09.015, 25.09.030, 25.09.040, 25.09.045, 25.09.052, 25.09.060, 25.09.065, 25.09.070, 25.09.090, 25.09.160, 25.09.200, 25.09.330, 25.09.335, 25.09.520, 25.12.390, 25.12.420, 25.12.845, 25.12.860, 25.16.050, 25.16.060, 25.24.050, 25.30.050, and 25.30.065 of the SMC; and repealing Section 23.44.015 of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 120394 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126682October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.45.508, 23.45.512, 23.45.518, 23.45.536, 23.53.015, 23.53.020, 23.53.025, 23.54.015, 23.54.030, 23.84A.024, 23.86.007, 23.86.014, and 23.86.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 23.53.002 to the Seattle Municipal Code; to implement changes to support the development of townhouses and rowhouses.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning & Community Development (OPCD). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Updates regulations to allow virtual meetings for the Design Review program and other land use permit processes following the termination of the….CB 120400 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates regulations to allow virtual meetings for the Design Review program and other land use permit processes following the termination of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126684October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; updating regulations to allow virtual meetings for the Design Review program and other land use permit processes following the termination of the civil emergency proclaimed by the Mayor on March 3, 2020, and discontinuation of temporary modifications of procedures enacted in Ordinance 126188; amending Sections 23.41.008, 23.42.057, 23.76.011, 23.76.012, 23.76.015, 23.76.016, 23.76.024, 23.76.046, 23.76.052, and 23.84A.025 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $267,700. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and making technical corrections.CB 120422 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and making technical corrections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126691October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to crimes and punishment; conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and making technical corrections; amending Sections 9.25.030, 9.25.100, 12A.02.050, 12A.02.150, 12A.06.045, 12A.09.020, 12A.10.150. 12A.12.010, 12A.14.010, 12A.14.160, 12A.14.170, 12A.16.040, and 12A.16.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding new Sections 12A.04.215, 12A.06.047, 12A.14.175, 12A.14.177, 12A.14.230, 12A.14.240, and 12A.14.260 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 12A.06.120, 12A.06.130, 12A.06.150, 12A.06.155, 12A.06.160, 12A.06.165, 12A.06.170, 12A.06.175, 12A.06.185, and 12A.06.190 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and making technical corrections.CB 120423 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and making technical corrections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126681October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s traffic code; conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and making technical corrections; amending Sections 11.31.050, 11.31.120, 11.40.220, 11.40.240, 11.56.020, 11.56.320, 11.58.005, 11.58.272, and 11.58.435 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 11.14.081 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLaw – Criminal. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 120405 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126683October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.41.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code to approve the Crown Hill Neighborhood Design Guidelines, 2022.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $8,046. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development (OPCD). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts drainage rates code to automatically pass-through changes to treatment rates charged by external wastewater treatment providers.CB 120417 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts drainage rates code to automatically pass-through changes to treatment rates charged by external wastewater treatment providers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126690October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to drainage services of Seattle Public Utilities; adjusting drainage rates code to automatically pass-through changes to treatment rates charged by external wastewater treatment providers; amending Section 21.33.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to enable automatic adjustment of treatment rates; and amending Section 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to enable automatic adjustment of credits to low-income drainage customers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Judges and Directors of the Seattle Municipal Court to accept a grant and execute related agreements.CB 120424 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originCourts & Legal EnforcementBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Judges and Directors of the Seattle Municipal Court to accept a grant and execute related agreements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126692October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Courts & Legal EnforcementBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Municipal Court; authorizing the Judges and Directors of the Seattle Municipal Court to accept a grant and execute related agreements; amending Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $366,557. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Municipal Court. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts wastewater rates code to automatically pass-through changes to treatment rates charged by external wastewater treatment providers.CB 120421 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts wastewater rates code to automatically pass-through changes to treatment rates charged by external wastewater treatment providers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126688October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to wastewater services of Seattle Public Utilities; adjusting wastewater rates code to automatically pass-through changes to treatment rates charged by external wastewater treatment providers; amending Section 21.28.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to enable automatic adjustment of treatment rates; and amending Section 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to enable automatic adjustment of credits to low-income wastewater customers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities / Legislative. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Approves a change to the approved alignment for the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority’s (“Sound Transit”) Link Light Rail Transit Project….CB 120455 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a change to the approved alignment for the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority’s (“Sound Transit”) Link Light Rail Transit Project….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126701November 18, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation; approving a change to the approved alignment for the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority’s (“Sound Transit”) Link Light Rail Transit Project and authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an amendment to the “Agreement between The City of Seattle and Sound Transit for Grant of Non-Exclusive Use of a Light Rail Transit Way as related to the Link Light Rail Transit Project” to include the addition of an infill station at Northeast 130th Street located within the City of Seattle; superseding Section 11.23.440 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow construction worker parking in related areas of 5th Ave NE; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Department directors to accept anticipated future grants and enter into revenue-backed service contracts to support appropriations in the 2023 Budget.CB 120452 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Department directors to accept anticipated future grants and enter into revenue-backed service contracts to support appropriations in the 2023 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126707December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debtfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2023 Budget; authorizing Department directors to accept anticipated future grants and enter into revenue-backed service contracts to support appropriations in the 2023 Budget.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising restricted parking zone program fees for restricted parking zone permits and guest permits.CB 120435 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising restricted parking zone program fees for restricted parking zone permits and guest permits.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126710December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Traffic Code; revising restricted parking zone program fees for restricted parking zone permits and guest permits; clarifying language related to the transition to virtual, license plate-based permitting; and amending Sections 3.12.120, 11.16.319, and 11.72.351 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $800,150. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Adding and revising various Seattle Fire Department permit, inspection, and plan review fees and related provisions.CB 120436 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originFire & EMSPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding and revising various Seattle Fire Department permit, inspection, and plan review fees and related provisions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126711December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Fire Department’s services and fees; adding and revising various Seattle Fire Department permit, inspection, and plan review fees and related provisions; and amending Sections 22.602.045, 22.602.050, and 22.602.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $479,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSFD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 4.04.075 to reflect the consolidation of the Alternative Dispute Program under the Office of the Employee Ombud.CB 120444 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 4.04.075 to reflect the consolidation of the Alternative Dispute Program under the Office of the Employee Ombud.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126722December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 4.04.075 to reflect the consolidation of the Alternative Dispute Program under the Office of the Employee Ombud.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a $10 increase to the vehicle license fee for a total fee of $50, pursuant to RCW 36.73.065 and 82.80.140.CB 120459 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Authorizes a $10 increase to the vehicle license fee for a total fee of $50, pursuant to RCW 36.73.065 and 82.80.140.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126720December 2, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Transportation Benefit District (STBD); authorizing a $10 increase to the vehicle license fee for a total fee of $50, pursuant to RCW 36.73.065 and 82.80.140.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Related to street and sidewalk use.CB 120429 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to street and sidewalk use.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126732December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss, Tammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to street and sidewalk use; to make permanent programmatic elements of the Temporary Business Recovery Permit program that authorized vending, merchandise display, outdoor cafes, and street closures in the city during the COVID-19 pandemic; adding new Chapter 15.15 and new Sections 11.14.711, 11.14.712, 11.14.713, 11.72.452, 15.17.040, and 15.17.051 to the Seattle Municipal Code; renumbering existing Section 11.14.712 of the Seattle Municipal Code as Section 11.14.714; amending Sections 11.14.228, 11.16.280.G, 11.23.160.F, 11.23.420, 11.23.440, 11.31.121, 11.72.195, 15.02.044, 15.02.046, 15.04.010, 15.04.035, 15.04.045, 15.04.060, 15.04.070, 15.04.074, 15.04.090, 15.16.040, 15.16.051, 15.16.080, 15.17.005, 15.17.006, 15.17.152, 15.17.200, 15.32.250.F, and 15.91.002 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 15.17.007, 15.17.008, 15.17.009, 15.17.050, 15.17.080, 15.17.100, 15.17.120, 15.17.130, 15.17.150, and 15.17.250 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending the Street Use Fee Schedule.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $625,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedTransportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts temporary regulations to exempt affordable housing projects from Design Review.CB 120464 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts temporary regulations to exempt affordable housing projects from Design Review.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126741December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss, Teresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Design Review for affordable housing; adopting temporary regulations to exempt affordable housing projects from Design Review; amending Section 23.41.004 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adopting a work plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a compost procurement policy for The City of Seattle.CB 120477 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originSolid WasteProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a compost procurement policy for The City of Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126737December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to compost procurement; establishing a compost procurement policy for The City of Seattle; and adding a new Subchapter IV to Chapter 20.60 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFacilities and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….CB 120469 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126729December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property lease with the 2724 6th Ave South, Limited Partnership on behalf of the Seattle Police Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,027,440. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes two years of ecological thinning, in accordance with the Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan, in Sections 8 and 9, Township….CB 119958 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes two years of ecological thinning, in accordance with the Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan, in Sections 8 and 9, Township….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126267January 8, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Cedar River Watershed; authorizing two years of ecological thinning, in accordance with the Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan, in Sections 8 and 9, Township 22, North, Range 8, East, W.M., Sections 3, 4, and 10, Township 21, North, Range 10, East, W.M., and Section 33, Township 22, North, Range 10, East, W.M.; declaring the logs resulting from ecological thinning to be surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of such logs pursuant to applicable City contracting and surplus property sale procedures; and directing deposit of the proceeds therefrom to the Water Fund for the purposes of the Habitat Conservation Plan implementation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates water regulations to conform to current standards.CB 119963 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates water regulations to conform to current standards.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126268January 8, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; updating water regulations to conform to current standards; making technical corrections; amending Sections 21.04.010, 21.04.020, 21.04.050, 21.04.060, 21.04.080, 21.04.150, 21.04.210, 21.04.300, 21.04.460, 21.04.530, 21.04.580, 21.08.010, and 21.12.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; repealing Section 21.04.590 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding new Sections 21.04.025, 21.04.061, and 21.04.062 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a subpoena process for the Office of Police Accountability and Office of Inspector General for Public Safety while ensuring due process….CB 119974 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceGovernment Accountability Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a subpoena process for the Office of Police Accountability and Office of Inspector General for Public Safety while ensuring due process….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126264January 8, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to civilian and community oversight of the police; creating a subpoena process for the Office of Police Accountability and Office of Inspector General for Public Safety while ensuring due process for individuals who are the subject of the subpoena; and adding new Sections 3.29.126 and 3.29.245 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes labor standards requirements for additional compensation for grocery employees working in Seattle.CB 119990 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes labor standards requirements for additional compensation for grocery employees working in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126274February 3, 2021
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; establishing labor standards requirements for additional compensation for grocery employees working in Seattle; amending Sections 3.02.125 and 6.208.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,021. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Adopts the Seattle Energy Code and chapters of the Washington Administrative Code by reference and amending certain chapters of the Code.CB 119993 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Seattle Energy Code and chapters of the Washington Administrative Code by reference and amending certain chapters of the Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126279February 9, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s construction codes; adopting the Seattle Energy Code and chapters of the Washington Administrative Code by reference and amending certain chapters of the Code; amending Section 22.101.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; repealing Title 22, Subtitle VII of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 2 through 10 of Ordinance 125159 and Section 5 of Ordinance 125410.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the 2018 International Fire Code by reference as the Seattle Fire Code.CB 119996 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the 2018 International Fire Code by reference as the Seattle Fire Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126283February 18, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s construction codes; adopting the 2018 International Fire Code by reference as the Seattle Fire Code; amending certain chapters of and adding new chapters to the Seattle Fire Code; amending Sections 3.02.125, 22.600.020, and 22.602.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code; repealing Sections 1 and 3 through 35 of Ordinance 125138, Section 1 of Ordinance 125392, and Sections 1 through 9 of Ordinance 125948; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFire. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes regulations for development of permanent supportive housing.CB 119975 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes regulations for development of permanent supportive housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126287March 12, 2021
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; establishing regulations for development of permanent supportive housing; adding a new Section 23.42.057 to, and amending Sections 23.41.004, 23.45.510, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.005, 23.47A.013, 23.48.005, 23.48.020, 23.48.605, 23.54.015, and 23.84A.032 of, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126219.CB 120006 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126219.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126288March 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting indebtedness; amending Ordinance 126219; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/CEN. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts interim regulations to allow home occupation businesses to operate with fewer limitations during the COVID-19 civil emergency, amending Seattle Municipal Code….CB 120001 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts interim regulations to allow home occupation businesses to operate with fewer limitations during the COVID-19 civil emergency, amending Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126293March 22, 2021
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use regulation of home occupations; adopting interim regulations to allow home occupation businesses to operate with fewer limitations during the COVID-19 civil emergency, amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 23.42.050, and adopting a work plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Guaranteeing the right to legal counsel regardless of ability to pay for any residential renter in Seattle responding to an unlawful detainer….CB 120007 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Guaranteeing the right to legal counsel regardless of ability to pay for any residential renter in Seattle responding to an unlawful detainer….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126301April 2, 2021
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential evictions; guaranteeing the right to legal counsel regardless of ability to pay for any residential renter in Seattle responding to an unlawful detainer suit; and adding a new Section 22.206.195 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $750,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily expanding access to assistance.CB 120036 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily expanding access to assistance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126318April 23, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities’ Emergency Assistance Program; temporarily expanding access to assistance; and amending Section 21.76.065 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $535,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to approve the transfer of control, subject to conditions, of WaveDivision I, LLC.CB 120043 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to approve the transfer of control, subject to conditions, of WaveDivision I, LLC.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126321April 30, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to cable television; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to approve the transfer of control, subject to conditions, of WaveDivision I, LLC; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to execute a Cable Franchise Transfer of Controlling Interest Consent Agreement for the purpose of implementing and administering the transfer; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Information Technology. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute, for and on behalf of the City, a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement….CB 120050 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute, for and on behalf of the City, a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126330May 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute, for and on behalf of the City, a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement with Southwest Youth and Family Services to provide family support center programs consistent with Seattle Parks and Recreation purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute documents removing recreational covenants from the Red Barn Ranch.CB 120048 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute documents removing recreational covenants from the Red Barn Ranch.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126329May 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City-owned real property known as the Red Barn Ranch and to the future North Rainier Park; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute documents removing recreational covenants from the Red Barn Ranch; and placing a restrictive covenant onto the North Rainier landbanked development property.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the civil service system.CB 120066 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originZoningCompensation & BenefitsWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126337May 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningCompensation & BenefitsWorkplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the First Quarter 2021 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the civil service system; adjusting the pay zone structures for 2021 for titles in the City’s discretionary pay programs; and amending Section 4.13.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Neighborhoods to accept a grant and execute related agreements.CB 120067 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Neighborhoods to accept a grant and execute related agreements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126338May 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2021 Budget; authorizing the Director of the Department of Neighborhoods to accept a grant and execute related agreements; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedDON. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125706 and the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120068 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 125706 and the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126339May 20, 2021
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending Ordinance 125706 and the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the organization of the Office for Civil Rights.CB 120000 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates the organization of the Office for Civil Rights.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126342May 28, 2021
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the organization of the Office for Civil Rights; amending Section 3.14.910 of the Seattle Municipal Code to change the end of the Director’s term and remove an outdated subsection requiring a racial equity toolkit.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle’s construction codes.CB 120083 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle’s construction codes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126358June 4, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s construction codes; amending Sections 713.13.7 and 1613.1.1 and Table 2902.1 of the 2018 Seattle Building Code, adopted by Ordinance 126278; amending Section R501.4 of the 2018 Seattle Energy Code, adopted by Ordinance 126279; amending Chapter 16 of the Seattle Existing Building Code, adopted by Ordinance 126278; and amending Sections 2.4, 4.5, 4.25, 4.26, and 5.9.1 of the Seattle Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, adopted by Ordinance 126278.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Grading Code to align with updates to other codes.CB 120084 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Grading Code to align with updates to other codes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126357June 4, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land disturbing activity; updating the Grading Code to align with updates to other codes; and amending Sections 22.170.020, 22.170.050, 22.170.060, 22.170.070, 22.170.080, 22.170.110, and 22.170.190 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 6.420 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 120085 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 6.420 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126359June 4, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to boiler and steam engine operations; amending Chapter 6.420 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the conveyance of the property to the Phinney Neighborhood Association, a Washington non-profit corporation, consistent with the intent of Resolution 31856….CB 120086 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originNeighborhoodsCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the conveyance of the property to the Phinney Neighborhood Association, a Washington non-profit corporation, consistent with the intent of Resolution 31856….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126356June 4, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
NeighborhoodsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the transfer of City property located at 525 North 85th Street; authorizing the conveyance of the property to the Phinney Neighborhood Association, a Washington non-profit corporation, consistent with the intent of Resolution 31856 and to provide for the continued delivery of social services; making findings of fact about the consideration for the transfer; superseding Resolution 31837 for the purposes of this ordinance; and authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or designee to execute and deliver documents necessary to carry out the conveyance of such property on the terms and conditions of this ordinance.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,900,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Urging Mayor Durkan and Governor Inslee to extend the City and State emergency moratoriums on evictions through no earlier than the end….Res 31998 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Urging Mayor Durkan and Governor Inslee to extend the City and State emergency moratoriums on evictions through no earlier than the end….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 7, 2021
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION urging Mayor Durkan and Governor Inslee to extend the City and State emergency moratoriums on evictions through no earlier than the end of 2021.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinances 126006, 126090, and 126241, on the filing, acceptance….CB 120080 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinances 126006, 126090, and 126241, on the filing, acceptance….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126362June 11, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; extending for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinances 126006, 126090, and 126241, on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of any application to establish a new principal or accessory use, or change a principal or accessory use, for any site currently used as a mobile home park, as defined in Section 23.84A.032 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides a defense to certain evictions of children, their families, and educators during the school year.CB 120046 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originYouth & Education Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Provides a defense to certain evictions of children, their families, and educators during the school year.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126369June 18, 2021
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to termination of residential rental tenancies; providing a defense to certain evictions of children, their families, and educators during the school year; and amending Section 22.206.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Provides a defense to eviction for rent due during the City’s COVID-19 civil emergency.CB 120077 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Provides a defense to eviction for rent due during the City’s COVID-19 civil emergency.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126368June 18, 2021
Recorded vote5 in favor · 2 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the termination of residential rental tenancies; providing a defense to eviction for rent due during the City’s COVID-19 civil emergency; and amending Section 22.206.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 2 opposed
Giving a tenant a right of first refusal of a new tenancy after the expiration of a tenancy for a specified time.CB 120090 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant ProtectionsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Giving a tenant a right of first refusal of a new tenancy after the expiration of a tenancy for a specified time.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126370June 18, 2021
Recorded vote5 in favor · 2 opposed
Tenant ProtectionsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to new residential rental tenancies; giving a tenant a right of first refusal of a new tenancy after the expiration of a tenancy for a specified time; requiring a landlord to have just cause for declining to give a tenant the right of first refusal; requiring notice in advance of asserting just cause; creating a private right for action for the tenant; providing a defense to eviction when a landlord fails to give a tenant a right of first refusal; allowing a tenant to rescind a termination agreement; and amending Sections 7.24.030, 14.08.050, and 22.206.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 2 opposed
Modifies existing development standards to facilitate creation of affordable housing.CB 120081 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies existing development standards to facilitate creation of affordable housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126384July 9, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to affordable housing on properties owned or controlled by religious organizations; modifying existing development standards to facilitate creation of affordable housing; amending Section 23.45.504 of the Seattle Municipal Code, renumbering Section 23.44.009 of the Seattle Municipal Code as Section 23.44.007 and Section 23.44.019 as Section 23.44.009; and adding new Sections 23.42.055, 23.44.019, 23.45.550, 23.47A.040, 23.48.100, and 23.49.037 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program.CB 120113 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126392July 27, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program; amending Section 5.73.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code to temporarily allow certain extensions of the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption program completion deadline as permitted by state law; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,500. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to creating a fund for Payroll Expense Tax revenues.CB 120118 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to creating a fund for Payroll Expense Tax revenues.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126393July 30, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to creating a fund for Payroll Expense Tax revenues; adding a new Section 5.38.055 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and providing additional guidelines for expending proceeds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the civil service system.CB 120120 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Returning positions to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126394July 30, 2021
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment of public records officers; returning positions to the civil service system; and amending Section 4.13.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,021. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates redevelopment at the Yesler Terrace Master Planned Community.CB 120108 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & Habitat Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates redevelopment at the Yesler Terrace Master Planned Community.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126403August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to redevelopment at the Yesler Terrace Master Planned Community; amending Section 23.75.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and replacing Exhibit C, Tree Protection Plan, of Ordinance 123962.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 3638 34th Avenue South.CB 120140 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 3638 34th Avenue South.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126410August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Propertyfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR); authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 3638 34th Avenue South; authorizing acceptance of a recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 1024 South Elmgrove Street.CB 120141 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 1024 South Elmgrove Street.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126411August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 1024 South Elmgrove Street; authorizing acceptance of a recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts interim provisions by amending Sections 23.76.004, 23.76.006, and 23.76.032 of, and adding a new Section 23.42.041 to, the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 120121 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts interim provisions by amending Sections 23.76.004, 23.76.006, and 23.76.032 of, and adding a new Section 23.42.041 to, the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126421August 18, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adopting interim provisions by amending Sections 23.76.004, 23.76.006, and 23.76.032 of, and adding a new Section 23.42.041 to, the Seattle Municipal Code to facilitate occupancy of street-level spaces downtown during the COVID-19 civil emergency; and adopting a work plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a 2021 Citywide Position List.CB 120144 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2021 Citywide Position List.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126419August 18, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adopting a 2021 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of less lethal weapons.CB 120105 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of less lethal weapons.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126422August 27, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of less lethal weapons; and amending Section 3.28.146 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record both temporary and permanent property rights from abutting property….CB 120138 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originZoningCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record both temporary and permanent property rights from abutting property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126430September 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Terminal 5 Quiet Zone Improvements project under the Freight Spot Improvement Program; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record both temporary and permanent property rights from abutting property owners located along West Marginal Way Southwest between 17th Avenue Southwest and Delridge Way Southwest, necessary or convenient for the Terminal 5 Quiet Zone Improvements project through negotiation or condemnation; placing the acquired real property rights under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation and designating for transportation, utility, and general municipal purposes; authorizing payment of all other costs associated with acquisition; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates water regulations to conform to current standards.CB 120161 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates water regulations to conform to current standards.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126440September 27, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; updating water regulations to conform to current standards; making technical corrections; and amending Section 21.04.480 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program.CB 120156 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126443September 27, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program; amending Sections 5.73.010, 5.73.020, 5.73.040, 5.73.090, 5.73.100, 5.73.105, and 5.73.110 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow extended property tax exemptions under certain conditions; to allow exemptions for up to 20 years for permanently affordable homeownership; to add reporting requirements for permanently affordable homeownership; and to make technical changes, consistent with chapter 84.14 of the Revised Code of Washington as amended.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies affordability requirements adopted in Ordinance 126384.CB 120157 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies affordability requirements adopted in Ordinance 126384.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126445October 1, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote5 in favor · 3 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to affordable housing on properties owned or controlled by religious organizations; modifying affordability requirements adopted in Ordinance 126384; and amending Section 23.42.055 of the Seattle Municipal Code and Section 10 of Ordinance 126384.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 3 opposed
Adding a new Section 23.49.167 to the Seattle Municipal Code to provide alternative development standards for small lots located in Downtown Mixed….CB 120153 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Section 23.49.167 to the Seattle Municipal Code to provide alternative development standards for small lots located in Downtown Mixed….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126448October 4, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adding a new Section 23.49.167 to the Seattle Municipal Code to provide alternative development standards for small lots located in Downtown Mixed Residential zones.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning & Community Development (OPCD). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring a minimum of 180 days' prior written notice to tenants whenever the housing costs to be charged a tenant are to….CB 119585 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring a minimum of 180 days' prior written notice to tenants whenever the housing costs to be charged a tenant are to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126450October 8, 2021
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential rental properties; requiring a minimum of 180 days' prior written notice to tenants whenever the housing costs to be charged a tenant are to increase; and amending Sections 7.24.030, 22.202.080, and 22.206.180 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending maximum size of use limits and minimum parking requirements for indoor sports and recreation uses.CB 120149 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending maximum size of use limits and minimum parking requirements for indoor sports and recreation uses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126452October 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending maximum size of use limits and minimum parking requirements for indoor sports and recreation uses; amending Sections 23.50.027 and 23.54.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of agreements between The City of Seattle and certain City unions.CB 120186 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective BargainingCompensation & Benefits Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of agreements between The City of Seattle and certain City unions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126453October 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective BargainingCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of agreements between The City of Seattle and certain City unions; authorizing compensation for certain City employees not covered by a collective bargaining agreement; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1,750. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Clarifying that a tenant relocation license is required before the removal of a rent or income restriction.CB 120182 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Clarifying that a tenant relocation license is required before the removal of a rent or income restriction.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126458October 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance; clarifying that a tenant relocation license is required before the removal of a rent or income restriction; and amending Sections 22.210.020, 22.210.030, 22.210.040, 22.210.050, 22.210.070, 22.210.080, 22.210.090, 22.210.100, 22.210.110, 22.210.120, 22.210.130, 22.210.136, 22.210.140, and 22.210.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $550,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Section 23.58A.044 of the Seattle Municipal Code to facilitate the transfer of development rights from Pierce and Snohomish Counties to Seattle.CB 120181 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Section 23.58A.044 of the Seattle Municipal Code to facilitate the transfer of development rights from Pierce and Snohomish Counties to Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126455October 15, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Section 23.58A.044 of the Seattle Municipal Code to facilitate the transfer of development rights from Pierce and Snohomish Counties to Seattle.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 8 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone portions of the….CB 120216 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 8 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone portions of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126464November 15, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 8 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone portions of the lot located at 14302 30th Avenue NE and portions of the lot located at 14330 30th Avenue NE from Single Family 7200 (SF 7200) to Lowrise 3 with a Mandatory Housing Affordability 2 suffix (LR3 (M2)) and accepting Property Use and Development Agreements as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by 14302 Development and the Seattle Housing Authority, C.F. 314367, SDCI Project 3023581-LU)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Department directors to accept anticipated future grants and enter into revenue-backed service contracts to support appropriations in the 2022 Budget.CB 120189 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Department directors to accept anticipated future grants and enter into revenue-backed service contracts to support appropriations in the 2022 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126472December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debtfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2022 Budget; authorizing Department directors to accept anticipated future grants and enter into revenue-backed service contracts to support appropriations in the 2022 Budget.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies fees associated with car sharing.CB 120202 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies fees associated with car sharing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126486December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Traffic Code; modifying fees associated with car sharing; clarifying certain definitions; establishing Seattle Department of Transportation authority for managing free-floating zone service areas; and amending Sections 11.14.087, 11.23.150, and 11.23.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $147,131. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an administrative amendment to Ordinance 115859, which established the Beach Maintenance Trust Fund (70200) as a subsidiary fund of the Shoreline….CB 120193 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an administrative amendment to Ordinance 115859, which established the Beach Maintenance Trust Fund (70200) as a subsidiary fund of the Shoreline….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126476December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR); authorizing an administrative amendment to Ordinance 115859, which established the Beach Maintenance Trust Fund (70200) as a subsidiary fund of the Shoreline Park Improvement Fund (SPIF) (33110), which fund was established by Ordinance 115496 as part of the settlement agreement with the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (“Metro”) for the construction of the West Point and Alki secondary sewage projects, and which expired in January 2011.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to enter into a new Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between The City of Seattle and King County to allow for….CB 120194 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to enter into a new Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between The City of Seattle and King County to allow for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126477December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds; authorizing the Mayor to enter into a new Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between The City of Seattle and King County to allow for the acceptance of Conservation Futures Levy funds; authorizing the deposit of 2020 and 2021 allocations from King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds into The City of Seattle’s Parks Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,225,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Acknowledging and approving the City Light Department’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2022-2023 and ten-year conservation potential.Res 32030 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricity Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acknowledging and approving the City Light Department’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2022-2023 and ten-year conservation potential.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 10, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving the City Light Department’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2022-2023 and ten-year conservation potential.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending terms and conditions pertaining to the emergency bill assistance program and temporarily expanding access to assistance to certain eligible households for….CB 120225 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityPublic Health Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending terms and conditions pertaining to the emergency bill assistance program and temporarily expanding access to assistance to certain eligible households for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126493December 10, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityPublic Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending terms and conditions pertaining to the emergency bill assistance program and temporarily expanding access to assistance to certain eligible households for a limited time in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) emergency; and amending Section 21.49.042 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinances 126006, 126090, 126241, and 126362, on the filing….CB 120213 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinances 126006, 126090, 126241, and 126362, on the filing….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126497December 10, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; extending for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinances 126006, 126090, 126241, and 126362, on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of any application to establish a new principal or accessory use, or change a principal or accessory use, for any site currently used as a mobile home park, as defined in Section 23.84A.032 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes Juneteenth as a legal holiday for certain City employees and a legal parking holiday.CB 120184 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes Juneteenth as a legal holiday for certain City employees and a legal parking holiday.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126505December 15, 2021
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; establishing Juneteenth as a legal holiday for certain City employees and a legal parking holiday; amending other provisions to implement Juneteenth as a legal holiday, conform with state law, and make technical corrections; and amending Sections 4.20.190 and 11.14.277 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to street vacations.CB 120227 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originAffordable Housing Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to street vacations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126507December 15, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to street vacations; amending Section 15.62.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code to exempt publicly funded affordable housing projects from compensating the City for vacations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Renaming Single-Family zones to Neighborhood Residential zones.CB 120214 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Renaming Single-Family zones to Neighborhood Residential zones.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126509December 15, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; renaming Single-Family zones to Neighborhood Residential zones; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) at pages 1 through 107, 111 through 114, 117 through 126, 131 through 140, 142 through 214, and 216 through 221 of the Official Land Use Map; renaming Chapter 23.44 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 6.600.080, 11.16.240, 15.16.040, 15.17.100, 15.17.120, 15.17.150, 15.32.200, 15.32.300, 22.801.200, 22.900C.010, 23.04.010, 23.30.010, 23.30.030, 23.34.006, 23.34.010, 23.34.011, 23.34.012, 23.34.013, 23.34.014, 23.34.018, 23.34.072, 23.34.089, 23.40.006, 23.41.004, 23.41.008, 23.42.052, 23.42.056, 23.42.058, 23.42.106, 23.42.108, 23.42.110, 23.42.112, 23.42.122, 23.42.124, 23.42.130, 23.44.002, 23.44.006, 23.44.008, 23.44.010, 23.44.011, 23.44.012, 23.44.013, 23.44.014, 23.44.016, 23.44.017, 23.44.019, 23.44.020, 23.44.021, 23.44.022, 23.44.024, 23.44.028, 23.44.034, 23.44.035, 23.44.036, 23.44.041, 23.44.046, 23.44.060, 23.45.514, 23.45.518, 23.45.527, 23.45.536, 23.45.550, 23.45.578, 23.47A.014, 23.47A.040, 23.50.024, 23.50.030, 23.51A.002, 23.51B.002, 23.53.006, 23.53.010, 23.53.015, 23.53.030, 23.54.015, 23.54.020, 23.55.012, 23.55.015, 23.55.020, 23.57.005, 23.57.008, 23.57.009, 23.57.010, 23.58C.050, 23.69.024, 23.71.012, 23.71.030, 23.71.036, 23.72.004, 23.72.010, 23.84A.048, 23.86.006, 23.86.007, 23.86.008, 23.86.010, 23.90.019, 23.91.002, 25.05.800, 25.08.225, 25.09.240, 25.09.260, 25.11.040, 25.11.050, and 25.11.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to….Res 32034 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to legally bind The City of Seattle with respect to certain projects for which the City seeks grant funding assistance managed through the State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,120,860. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle’s construction codes.CB 120239 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates Seattle’s construction codes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126508December 15, 2021
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis, Dan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s construction codes; amending Sections C404.2.3, C404.2.3.1, C406.8, C406.8.1, C503.4.6, and C503.5 and Table 406.1 of the 2018 Seattle Energy Code, adopted by Ordinance 126279.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Chapter 23.70 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).CB 120206 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adding a new Chapter 23.70 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126519December 27, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adding a new Chapter 23.70 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); amending Chapter 23.32 of the SMC at page 14 of the Official Land Use Map to establish a Mobile Home Park Overlay District; amending Section 23.84A.032 of the SMC; and requesting that the Office of Housing add the census tract in which the Mobile Home Park Overlay District is located to those eligible for the affirmative marketing and community preference policy adopted in the Housing Funding Policies.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 2: the measure creates a lasting regulatory, charter, or voter-approved structure. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 2Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use review decision procedures.CB 120215 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates land use review decision procedures.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126518December 27, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use review decision procedures; amending Section 23.51A.002 of the Seattle Municipal Code to authorize the Director of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections to administratively waive development standards for minor expansions of sewage treatment plants subject to a Department of Ecology corrective order and finding an emergency under Seattle Municipal Code Section 25.05.880.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to elections.CB 119731 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to elections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126035January 17, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to elections; prohibiting foreign-influenced corporations from making independent expenditures or contributing to campaigns and independent expenditure committees; amending Sections 2.04.010, 2.04.260, 2.04.270, 2.04.360, and 2.04.370 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and adding a new Section 2.04.400 to the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $149,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to political advertising and qualified public communications.CB 119732 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to political advertising and qualified public communications.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126036January 21, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to political advertising and qualified public communications; expanding commercial advertisers’ duty to maintain and provide records regarding political advertising and qualified public communications; amending Sections 2.04.010 and 2.04.280 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Prohibiting evictions in winter months.CB 119726 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Prohibiting evictions in winter months.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126041February 24, 2020
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to termination of residential rental tenancies; prohibiting evictions in winter months; and amending Section 22.206.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.CB 119743 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126047February 28, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations for the Seattle Department of Transportation; revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2020-2025 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 62 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 119750 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 62 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126048March 2, 2020
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 62 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 4544, 4550, and 4600 Union Bay Place NE from Commercial 2-55 (M) (C2-55 (M)) to Commercial 2-65 (M1) (C2-65 (M1)); and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Barrientos Ryan LLC, C.F. 314434, SDCI Project 3030253-LU)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Regulates rental housing bidding platforms.CB 119752 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Regulates rental housing bidding platforms.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126053March 13, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fair housing; regulating rental housing bidding platforms; repealing a one-year prohibition on use of rental housing bidding platforms; repealing Section 7.24.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 7.24.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2020-2021 and ten-year conservation potential.Res 31932 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricity Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2020-2021 and ten-year conservation potential.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 18, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2020-2021 and ten-year conservation potential.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates employment in Seattle.CB 119754 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates employment in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126056March 18, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; amending Sections 14.16.010 and 14.16.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to strengthen and clarify labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time for employees working in Seattle; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119757 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentHuman Services & Food SecurityEconomic Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126057March 24, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentHuman Services & Food SecurityEconomic Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; changing appropriations to the Human Services Department, the Executive Department’s Office of Economic Development, and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget, for the purpose of providing financial assistance to small businesses; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,416,298. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts.CB 119758 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126058March 24, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light and Seattle Public Utilities Departments; temporarily removing the charge of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts; superseding several sections under Title 21 that authorize and require the collection of interest on delinquent utility consumption and utilization accounts; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119760 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentEconomic DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126060March 24, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentEconomic DevelopmentBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; changing appropriations to the Executive Department’s Office of Housing, the Executive Department’s Office of Economic Development, and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget, for the purpose of providing financial assistance to small businesses; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $968,718. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Calling on Governor Inslee to impose an immediate moratorium on rent payments and urging the Governor to call on federal legislators and….Res 31940 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Calling on Governor Inslee to impose an immediate moratorium on rent payments and urging the Governor to call on federal legislators and….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 30, 2020
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling on Governor Inslee to impose an immediate moratorium on rent payments and urging the Governor to call on federal legislators and the Trump administration to impose an immediate moratorium on rent and mortgage payments; and calling on federal legislators and the Trump administration to impose an immediate moratorium on rent and mortgage payments.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,600. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119764 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationYouth & EducationNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126063April 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationYouth & EducationNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; changing appropriations to the Executive Department’s Office of Sustainability and Environment, the Department of Neighborhoods, the Department of Education and Early Learning, Seattle Parks and Recreation, and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget, for the purpose of providing food support to individuals in Seattle; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily suspending deadlines imposed by the Seattle Municipal Code for the duties of the Hearing Examiner.CB 119770 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily suspending deadlines imposed by the Seattle Municipal Code for the duties of the Hearing Examiner.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126068April 17, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Office of the Hearing Examiner; temporarily suspending deadlines imposed by the Seattle Municipal Code for the duties of the Hearing Examiner; temporarily superseding several sections of the Seattle Municipal Code that impose deadlines on the actions of the Hearing Examiner; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,020. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Ph one: CBO Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily modifying and suspending procedures in Titles 23 and 25 of the Seattle Municipal Code and amending Chapters 23.41, 23.49, 23.66, 23.79….CB 119769 · Council Bill (CB) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Council Bill (CB)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily modifying and suspending procedures in Titles 23 and 25 of the Seattle Municipal Code and amending Chapters 23.41, 23.49, 23.66, 23.79….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126072April 29, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use review decision and meeting procedures; temporarily modifying and suspending procedures in Titles 23 and 25 of the Seattle Municipal Code and amending Chapters 23.41, 23.49, 23.66, 23.79, 25.12, 25.16, 25.20, 25.21, 25.22, 25.24, and 25.30 of the Seattle Municipal Code, consistent with the Governor’s proclamations and the Mayor’s proclamation of civil emergency on March 3, 2020; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Provides a defense to evictions occurring within six months after the termination of the Mayor’s residential eviction moratorium as amended by Resolution….CB 119784 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant ProtectionsPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Provides a defense to evictions occurring within six months after the termination of the Mayor’s residential eviction moratorium as amended by Resolution….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126075May 6, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant ProtectionsPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to termination of residential rental tenancies; providing a defense to evictions occurring within six months after the termination of the Mayor’s residential eviction moratorium as amended by Resolution 31938; amending Section 22.206.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Regulates the use of eviction history in residential housing.CB 119787 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Regulates the use of eviction history in residential housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126080May 15, 2020
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the use of eviction records; regulating the use of eviction history in residential housing; prohibiting landlords from considering evictions related to COVID-19 during and after the civil emergency; amending the title of Chapter 14.09 and Sections 14.09.005, 14.09.010, 14.09.020, and 14.09.030 of, and adding a new Section 14.09.026 to, the Seattle Municipal Code; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding for flexibility to respond to the civil emergency declared on March 3, 2020.CB 119795 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding for flexibility to respond to the civil emergency declared on March 3, 2020.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126088June 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding for flexibility to respond to the civil emergency declared on March 3, 2020; providing certain benefits and conditions for employees using leave pursuant to the Families First Coronavirus Response Act; temporarily suspending vacation accrual maximums of Seattle Municipal Code 4.34.020; providing for maintenance of medical benefits for unpaid leave; temporarily suspending scheduling change notices to employees required by Seattle Municipal Code 4.20.365; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the Seattle City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a new University District Parking and Business Improvement Area (BIA).CB 119779 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a new University District Parking and Business Improvement Area (BIA).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126093June 12, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing a new University District Parking and Business Improvement Area (BIA); levying special assessments upon owners of commercial, multifamily residential property, and mixed-use property within the BIA; providing for the deposit of revenues in a special account and expenditures therefrom; providing for collection of and penalties for delinquencies; providing for the establishment of a BIA Advisory Board; providing for an implementation agreement with a Program Manager; providing for the continuity of services and the transfer of any remaining funds from the current U. District BIA account that was established in 2015 by Ordinance 124761; and ratifying and confirming certain acts related thereto.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,212,623. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedEconomic Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinance 126006, on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval….CB 119797 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinance 126006, on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126090June 12, 2020
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; extending for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinance 126006, on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of any application to establish a new principal or accessory use, or change a principal or accessory use, for any site currently used as a mobile home park, as defined in Section 23.84A.032 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time for gig workers working in Seattle.CB 119793 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time for gig workers working in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126091June 12, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to gig workers in Seattle; establishing labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time for gig workers working in Seattle; and amending Sections 3.02.125 and 6.208.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes labor standards requirements for premium pay for gig workers working in Seattle.CB 119799 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes labor standards requirements for premium pay for gig workers working in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126094June 26, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Andrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to gig workers in Seattle; establishing labor standards requirements for premium pay for gig workers working in Seattle; amending Sections 3.02.125 and 6.208.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring that certain uniformed peace officers do not cover with a mourning band the serial number that is engraved on their badge.CB 119803 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requiring that certain uniformed peace officers do not cover with a mourning band the serial number that is engraved on their badge.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126095June 26, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE requiring that certain uniformed peace officers do not cover with a mourning band the serial number that is engraved on their badge; amending Section 3.28.130 of the Seattle Municipal Code; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative / Seattle Police Dept.. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Prohibiting the use of chokeholds by officers.CB 119804 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Prohibiting the use of chokeholds by officers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126096June 26, 2020
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; prohibiting the use of chokeholds by officers; amending Section 12A.04.200 of, and adding a new Section 3.28.145 to, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons.CB 119805 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126102June 26, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; banning the ownership, purchase, rent, storage, or use of crowd control weapons; and adding a new Section 3.28.146 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative / Seattle Police Dept.. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Removing the crime of drug traffic loitering and associated references in the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119807 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Removing the crime of drug traffic loitering and associated references in the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126098June 26, 2020
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis, Tammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; removing the crime of drug traffic loitering and associated references in the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Section 10.09.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code and repealing Section 12A.20.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Removing the crime of prostitution loitering and associated references in the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119808 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Removing the crime of prostitution loitering and associated references in the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126099June 26, 2020
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; removing the crime of prostitution loitering and associated references in the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Sections 12A.10.070 and 12A.10.100 and repealing Section 12A.10.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….CB 119826 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126107July 13, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget, including the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations for the Seattle Department of Transportation; revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2020-2025 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a spending plan for proposed use of the proceeds generated from the payroll expense tax authorized by the ordinance introduced as….CB 119811 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment Accountability Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a spending plan for proposed use of the proceeds generated from the payroll expense tax authorized by the ordinance introduced as….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126109July 17, 2020
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & DebtGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing a spending plan for proposed use of the proceeds generated from the payroll expense tax authorized by the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119810 establishing an oversight committee; and adding a new Section 3.35.100 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,020. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Provides additional easement area for improvement and expansion of the Monorail station platform.CB 119815 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides additional easement area for improvement and expansion of the Monorail station platform.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126111July 20, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Monorail, authorizing the Director of the Seattle Center Department to execute a second amendment to the easement agreement with Westlake Center, LLC previously authorized by Ordinance 113272; providing additional easement area for improvement and expansion of the Monorail station platform; granting rights to install and maintain ticket kiosks and commercial and informational signage; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to acquire by negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation) four separate parcels of….CB 119828 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCourts & Legal EnforcementWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to acquire by negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation) four separate parcels of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126112July 24, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Courts & Legal EnforcementWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to acquire by negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation) four separate parcels of land and all other necessary property rights owned by JSO Legacy Properties, LLC; John S. Roach as his separate property, and BNSF Railway Company, all located within Blocks 25 and 26 and vacated Court Street of the recorded plat of South Seattle, for water operations general purposes, and to execute, accept, and record deeds and conveyance documents and agreements deemed by the General Manager/CEO to be necessary to this transaction on behalf of the City; placing the conveyed real properties under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing payment of all other costs associated with the acquisition; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities (SPU). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes labor standards requirements for premium pay for gig workers in Seattle.CB 119841 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes labor standards requirements for premium pay for gig workers in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126122August 14, 2020
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to gig workers in Seattle; establishing labor standards requirements for premium pay for gig workers in Seattle; amending Sections 100.015, 100.027, and 100.200 of Ordinance 126094 to make technical corrections; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,463. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time for gig workers working in Seattle.CB 119842 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time for gig workers working in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126123August 14, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to gig workers in Seattle; establishing labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time for gig workers working in Seattle; and amending Sections 100.015 and 100.080 of Ordinance 126091 to make technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,463. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies use and development standards to remove regulatory impediments and allow the siting of child care centers throughout the city.CB 119831 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentYouth & Education Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Modifies use and development standards to remove regulatory impediments and allow the siting of child care centers throughout the city.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126131August 21, 2020
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; modifying use and development standards to remove regulatory impediments and allow the siting of child care centers throughout the city; and amending Sections 23.42.050, 23.44.006, 23.44.022, 23.45.510, 23.45.570, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.013, 23.48.005, 23.48.605, 23.48.620, 23.48.720, 23.48.732, 23.49.011, 23.50.028, and 23.84A.018 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807.CB 119823 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & Education Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126129August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2018 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy; amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Education & Early Learning. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2020, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119819 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2020, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126125August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2020, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the Mayor or Mayor’s designee to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,662,002. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Delaying the effective date of the heating oil tax on heating oil service providers under Chapter 5.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119859 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Delaying the effective date of the heating oil tax on heating oil service providers under Chapter 5.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126144August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; delaying the effective date of the heating oil tax on heating oil service providers under Chapter 5.47 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and delaying the date of the Office of Sustainability and Environment’s first annual heating oil tax program status report.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $788,175. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Sustainability & Environment. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Named in honor of MiChance Dunlap-Gittens and relating to the Seattle Police Department.CB 119840 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Named in honor of MiChance Dunlap-Gittens and relating to the Seattle Police Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126132August 25, 2020
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE named in honor of MiChance Dunlap-Gittens and relating to the Seattle Police Department; prohibiting law enforcement officers from questioning, except in limited circumstances, persons 18 years of age or younger where a Miranda warning is administered unless legal counsel is provided; prohibiting law enforcement officers from requesting permission from a person under 18 years of age to conduct a search of the person or property, dwellings, or vehicles under that person’s control unless legal counsel is provided for that person; and adding a new Section 3.28.147 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments.CB 119835 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126157September 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments; amending Sections 22.214.040, 22.214.050, 23.22.062, 23.22.100, 23.24.040, 23.24.045, 23.28.030, 23.40.060, 23.41.004, 23.41.012, 23.42.048, 23.42.112, 23.44.008, 23.44.010, 23.44.014, 23.44.016, 23.44.026, 23.44.041, 23.45.506, 23.45.512, 23.45.518, 23.45.522, 23.45.545, 23.47A.008, 23.47A.012, 23.47A.013, 23.48.005, 23.48.020, 23.48.025, 23.48.220, 23.48.225, 23.48.245, 23.48.720, 23.48.724, 23.48.740, 23.49.008, 23.49.011, 23.49.014, 23.49.056, 23.49.166, 23.52.008, 23.54.015, 23.54.025, 23.54.030, 23.54.040, 23.58C.040, 23.58D.006, 23.66.342, 23.69.032, 23.73.009, 23.73.012, 23.84A.004, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.036, 23.86.007, 23.90.018, and 25.09.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 23.48.007 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Updates the City’s traffic code.CB 119867 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City’s traffic code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126160September 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Streets & SidewalksElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s traffic code; amending Sections 11.46.010 and 11.46.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code to revise permissible areas of operation in the right-of-way and other public pathways for electric personal assistive mobility devices and motorized foot scooters.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 208 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the….CB 119827 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 208 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126167September 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 208 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the Rainier Beach neighborhood.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning & Community Development (OPCD). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates violations of civil emergency orders.CB 119869 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates violations of civil emergency orders.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126165September 21, 2020
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to violations of civil emergency orders; amending Section 10.02.110 of the Seattle Municipal Code to establish enforcement actions for violations of civil emergency orders; adding a new Section 10.02.120 to the Seattle Municipal Code to establish a severability clause to Chapter 10.02; repealing Chapter 12A.26 of the Seattle Municipal Code to consolidate provisions related to civil emergency orders; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119862 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126151September 22, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; changing appropriations to the Legislative Department; appropriating funds from the Revenue Stabilization Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and CEO to execute a ten-year agreement with Pend Oreille County, for loss of revenues and additional financial….CB 119870 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and CEO to execute a ten-year agreement with Pend Oreille County, for loss of revenues and additional financial….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126177September 25, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and CEO to execute a ten-year agreement with Pend Oreille County, for loss of revenues and additional financial burdens associated with the City Light Department’s operation of the Boundary Hydroelectric Project on the Pend Oreille River pursuant to RCW 35.21.420, 35.21.425, 35.21.426, and 35.21.427; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Clarifying that residents living in the City Light Department owned housing in the Diablo and Newhalem communities are subject to the City….CB 119857 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Clarifying that residents living in the City Light Department owned housing in the Diablo and Newhalem communities are subject to the City….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126176September 25, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; clarifying that residents living in the City Light Department owned housing in the Diablo and Newhalem communities are subject to the City Light Department’s rates under Chapter 21.49 and 21.56 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Section 21.56.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes updated eligibility requirements for net metering and customer-requested net metering aggregation billing arrangements.CB 119871 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes updated eligibility requirements for net metering and customer-requested net metering aggregation billing arrangements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126178September 25, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; establishing updated eligibility requirements for net metering and customer-requested net metering aggregation billing arrangements; and amending Section 21.49.082 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City Light Department.CB 119885 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126179September 25, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Section 21.49.084 of the Seattle Municipal Code to enable a broader suite of voluntary renewable energy program options to City Light customers.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the conveyance of the property to Byrd Barr Place, a Washington non-profit corporation, consistent with the intent of Resolution 31856 and….CB 119886 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the conveyance of the property to Byrd Barr Place, a Washington non-profit corporation, consistent with the intent of Resolution 31856 and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126172September 25, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the transfer of City property located at 722 18th Avenue, Seattle, Washington; authorizing the conveyance of the property to Byrd Barr Place, a Washington non-profit corporation, consistent with the intent of Resolution 31856 and to provide for the continued delivery of social services; making findings of fact about the consideration for the transfer; authorizing acceptance of a negative easement restricting future development of the property; superseding Resolution 31837 for the purposes of this ordinance; and authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or designee to execute and deliver documents necessary to carry out the conveyance of such property on the terms and conditions of this ordinance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Establishes a permanent Equitable Development Initiative Advisory Board.CB 119887 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentGovernment Accountability Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a permanent Equitable Development Initiative Advisory Board.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126173September 25, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to community involvement in the oversight of the Equitable Development Initiative; establishing a permanent Equitable Development Initiative Advisory Board; and adding new Sections 3.14.994, 3.14.995, 3.14.996, 3.14.997, and 3.14.998 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a 2020 Citywide Position List.CB 119888 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2020 Citywide Position List.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126180October 2, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adopting a 2020 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expanding the definition of “report” in the City of Seattle’s whistleblower protection ordinance to include reporting to the Office of Inspector General….CB 119893 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Expanding the definition of “report” in the City of Seattle’s whistleblower protection ordinance to include reporting to the Office of Inspector General….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126184October 2, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle whistleblower protection code; expanding the definition of “report” in the City of Seattle’s whistleblower protection ordinance to include reporting to the Office of Inspector General for Public Safety; amending Section 4.20.805 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily modifying and suspending procedures in Titles 23 and 25 of the Seattle Municipal Code and amending Chapters 23.41, 23.49, 23.66, 23.79….CB 119877 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Temporarily modifying and suspending procedures in Titles 23 and 25 of the Seattle Municipal Code and amending Chapters 23.41, 23.49, 23.66, 23.79….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126188October 6, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use review decision and meeting procedures; temporarily modifying and suspending procedures in Titles 23 and 25 of the Seattle Municipal Code and amending Chapters 23.41, 23.49, 23.66, 23.79, 25.12, 25.16, 25.20, 25.21, 25.22, 25.24, and 25.30 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Updates the City Light Department.CB 119899 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126195October 8, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Section 21.49.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code; updating the City Light Department’s Open Access Transmission Tariff and rates to meet changes in costs and regulations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the 2021 assessment values update.CB 119884 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies the 2021 assessment values update.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126191October 8, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area; modifying the 2021 assessment values update; and amending Ordinance 125678.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $985,966. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119942 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126201October 30, 2020
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; amending Ordinance 126148; amending a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,900,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the conveyance of the property to the Central Area Senior Center, a Washington non-profit corporation, consistent with the intent of Resolution….CB 119906 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the conveyance of the property to the Central Area Senior Center, a Washington non-profit corporation, consistent with the intent of Resolution….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126204November 10, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the transfer of City property located at 500 30th Avenue South, Seattle, Washington; authorizing the conveyance of the property to the Central Area Senior Center, a Washington non-profit corporation, consistent with the intent of Resolution 31856 and to provide for the continued delivery of social services; making findings of fact about the consideration for the transfer; superseding Resolution 31837 for the purposes of this ordinance; and authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or designee to execute and deliver documents necessary to carry out the conveyance of such property on the terms and conditions of this ordinance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,900,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending election procedures for the employee-elected members of the Civil Service Commission and Public Safety Civil Service Commission.CB 119945 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsElections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending election procedures for the employee-elected members of the Civil Service Commission and Public Safety Civil Service Commission.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126206November 13, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace StandardsElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to civil service commissions; amending election procedures for the employee-elected members of the Civil Service Commission and Public Safety Civil Service Commission; making temporary provisions for the 2020 elections; amending Sections 4.04.250 and 4.08.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of the City Clerk. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts drainage rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County.CB 119915 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts drainage rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126215December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to drainage services of Seattle Public Utilities; adjusting drainage rates to pass through changes to treatment rates charged by King County; amending Section 21.33.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect the adjusted rates; and amending Section 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust credits to low-income drainage customers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $289,003. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Admission Tax revenue.CB 119928 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Admission Tax revenue.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126228December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Admission Tax revenue; amending Section 5.40.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle Center parking charges.CB 119929 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle Center parking charges.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126229December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Center parking charges; amending Section 17.19.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to modify terms of the monthly parking program and permits issued to short-term premises licensees, increase parking enforcement fees and maximum price for the premium parking program, adjust Special Parking charges, and revise online customer transaction fees to align with SMC 5.22.020.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides relief from taxation of cancellation of indebtedness as income on persons engaging in business in Seattle.CB 119937 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides relief from taxation of cancellation of indebtedness as income on persons engaging in business in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126236December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation; providing relief from taxation of cancellation of indebtedness as income on persons engaging in business in Seattle; and amending Section 5.45.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO/FAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and….CB 119913 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126213December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, related fees by other departments, and technical corrections; amending Sections 22.900C.010, 22.900D.090, 22.900D.100, 22.900D.150, and 22.900G.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and repealing Section 22.900E.060 of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $430,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates transportation network company drivers.CB 119936 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates transportation network company drivers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126235December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to transportation network company drivers; amending Section 14.32.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to change the Transportation Network Company (TNC) coverage trip threshold; and amending the effective date of Ordinance 125976.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Labor Standards. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Department directors to accept anticipated future grants and enter into revenue-backed service contracts to support appropriations in the 2021 Budget.CB 119912 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Department directors to accept anticipated future grants and enter into revenue-backed service contracts to support appropriations in the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126212December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debtfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2021 Budget; authorizing Department directors to accept anticipated future grants and enter into revenue-backed service contracts to support appropriations in the 2021 Budget.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2020, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119909 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2020, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126209December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2020, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the Mayor or Mayor’s designee to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,679,689. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a new Community Safety and Communications Center.CB 119949 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates a new Community Safety and Communications Center.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126233December 1, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the organization of City government; creating a new Community Safety and Communications Center; and making necessary amendments to Chapters 3.15, 3.28, 6.10, 10.08, 11.14, 11.16, and 12A.16 of the Seattle Municipal Code and Ordinance 86431 to implement associated organizational changes and make technical revisions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the Seattle Transportation Benefit District (STBD).CB 119951 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to the Seattle Transportation Benefit District (STBD).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126234December 1, 2020
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the Seattle Transportation Benefit District (STBD); authorizing a $40 vehicle license fee pursuant to RCW 36.73.065 and 82.80.140; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute an amendment to the amended and restated Concession Agreement with Tennis Center at….CB 119746 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute an amendment to the amended and restated Concession Agreement with Tennis Center at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126244December 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute an amendment to the amended and restated Concession Agreement with Tennis Center at Sand Point, LLC at Warren G. Magnuson Park.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinances 126006 and 126090, on the filing, acceptance, processing….CB 119907 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinances 126006 and 126090, on the filing, acceptance, processing….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126241December 11, 2020
Official sponsorsDan Strauss, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; extending for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764, and extended by Ordinances 126006 and 126090, on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of any application to establish a new principal or accessory use, or change a principal or accessory use, for any site currently used as a mobile home park, as defined in Section 23.84A.032 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to legally bind The City….Res 31981 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to legally bind The City….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation; authorizing the Director to act as the authorized representative/agent on behalf of The City of Seattle and to legally bind The City of Seattle with respect to certain projects for which the City seeks grant funding assistance managed through the Recreation and Conservation Office.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,120,860. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Regarding the Transit Service Funding Agreement with King County.CB 119960 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Regarding the Transit Service Funding Agreement with King County.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126251December 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE regarding the Transit Service Funding Agreement with King County; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an amendment to the agreement extending the term to June 30, 2021; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a loan of up to $1,000,000 in General Fund funds to Community Roots Housing, a Washington public corporation, to mitigate the….CB 119973 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a loan of up to $1,000,000 in General Fund funds to Community Roots Housing, a Washington public corporation, to mitigate the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126258December 16, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to affordable housing; authorizing a loan of up to $1,000,000 in General Fund funds to Community Roots Housing, a Washington public corporation, to mitigate the financial impacts of COVID-19; and authorizing certain new agreements to be developed relating to the lending of General Fund funds to Community Roots Housing.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expanding lobbying regulations to cover grassroots lobbying campaigns.CB 119968 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Expanding lobbying regulations to cover grassroots lobbying campaigns.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126260December 16, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to lobbying regulations; expanding lobbying regulations to cover grassroots lobbying campaigns; correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments; and amending Chapter 2.06 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $168,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119977 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126255December 16, 2020
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; making appropriations from the General Fund for public assistance during the COVID-19 civil emergency; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Removing certain considerations between an exclusive driver representative and the Director of Finance and Administrative Services.CB 119427 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureOrigin unclear Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Removing certain considerations between an exclusive driver representative and the Director of Finance and Administrative Services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125752January 11, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Mike O'Brien
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the regulation of the for-hire industry; removing certain considerations between an exclusive driver representative and the Director of Finance and Administrative Services; amending Section 6.310.735 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing rules and regulations to the extent they are inconsistent with this ordinance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the title of Chapter 23.52, Subchapter I, of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).CB 119398 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the title of Chapter 23.52, Subchapter I, of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125757January 18, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the title of Chapter 23.52, Subchapter I, of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); amending Sections 23.52.004 and 23.52.008 of the SMC; and repealing Section 23.52.002 of the SMC, to implement the Comprehensive Plan adopted level of service standard.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of applications for development in areas currently used as mobile home parks.CB 119451 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of applications for development in areas currently used as mobile home parks.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125764February 6, 2019
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant, Mike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adopting a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of applications for development in areas currently used as mobile home parks; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119362 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125776February 22, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.41.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code to approve the 2018 University District Neighborhood Design Guidelines.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $8,290. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119439 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125775February 22, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.41.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code to approve the 2019 Uptown Neighborhood Design Guidelines.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $17,174. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Seattle Children’s Research Institute permission to construct, install, and maintain one set of private communication conduits under and across Terry Avenue….CB 119457 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Seattle Children’s Research Institute permission to construct, install, and maintain one set of private communication conduits under and across Terry Avenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125774February 22, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Seattle Children’s Research Institute permission to construct, install, and maintain one set of private communication conduits under and across Terry Avenue, south of Virginia Street and north of Stewart Street; and one set of private communication conduits under and across the alley between Virginia Street and Stewart Street, north of 9th Avenue and south of Terry Avenue; for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,842. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the vertical and horizontal reference datum for City of Seattle departments and outside entities as a standard elevation reference plane.CB 119420 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the vertical and horizontal reference datum for City of Seattle departments and outside entities as a standard elevation reference plane.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125781March 8, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s datum point; updating the vertical and horizontal reference datum for City of Seattle departments and outside entities as a standard elevation reference plane; requiring certain measurements for preliminary plats to be based on the updated vertical and horizontal datum; amending Chapter 1.20 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 23.22.020, 23.75.100, 25.06.030, 25.06.070, and 25.06.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute a contract with Waste Management of Washington for construction waste collection services.CB 119464 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute a contract with Waste Management of Washington for construction waste collection services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125782March 8, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contractsfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute a contract with Waste Management of Washington for construction waste collection services; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants the University of Washington permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian tunnel under and across Northeast Pacific Street, west of Montlake….CB 119473 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants the University of Washington permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian tunnel under and across Northeast Pacific Street, west of Montlake….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125789March 15, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting the University of Washington permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian tunnel under and across Northeast Pacific Street, west of Montlake Boulevard Northeast, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $12,720. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a lease agreement between the City of Seattle and Selig Holdings Company, LLC….CB 119485 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a lease agreement between the City of Seattle and Selig Holdings Company, LLC….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125802April 5, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a lease agreement between the City of Seattle and Selig Holdings Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for office space in the building located at 300 Elliott Avenue West, commonly known as the Elliott Bay Office Park; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks & Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to monitoring and inspecting vacant buildings for compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Building Maintenance Code.CB 119497 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to monitoring and inspecting vacant buildings for compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Building Maintenance Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125811April 26, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to monitoring and inspecting vacant buildings for compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Building Maintenance Code; amending Section 22.900F.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Ordinance 125704 and Ordinance 125727 to modify monitoring fees and monitoring program requirements.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $457,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Secondary Use Policies, adopted by Ordinance 114632, to provide for the limited application of the herbicide imazapyr to treat invasive….CB 119502 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & Habitat Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Secondary Use Policies, adopted by Ordinance 114632, to provide for the limited application of the herbicide imazapyr to treat invasive….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125813May 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Cedar River Municipal Watershed; amending the Secondary Use Policies, adopted by Ordinance 114632, to provide for the limited application of the herbicide imazapyr to treat invasive knotweed species.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119472 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125815May 8, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.22.062, 23.24.045, 23.49.019, 23.54.030, and 23.84A.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding new requirements related to electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Construction & Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 budget.CB 119509 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125818May 16, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a Mobile Integrated Health pilot; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $475,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City of Seattle’s Paid Family Care Leave program.CB 119513 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City of Seattle’s Paid Family Care Leave program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125834June 17, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City of Seattle’s Paid Family Care Leave program; amending Sections 4.29.010, 4.29.020, 4.29.030, and 4.29.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Allowing limited expansion of Major Institution uses in a portion of Industrial General 1 and 2 zones and Industrial Buffer zones located….CB 119489 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allowing limited expansion of Major Institution uses in a portion of Industrial General 1 and 2 zones and Industrial Buffer zones located….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125845June 18, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; allowing limited expansion of Major Institution uses in a portion of Industrial General 1 and 2 zones and Industrial Buffer zones located near Seattle Pacific University; and amending Sections 23.50.012 and 23.69.024 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119505 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125843June 18, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.41.010 and 23.41.012 of the Seattle Municipal Code to remove the Ballard Municipal Center Master Plan Area Guidelines and adopt the Ballard Neighborhood Design Guidelines, and delete reference to the Ballard Municipal Center Master Plan Area Guidelines.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $17,176. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119506 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125844June 18, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.41.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code to approve the Capitol Hill Neighborhood Design Guidelines, 2019.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $17,174. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a one-year prohibition on use of rental housing bidding platforms.CB 119507 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a one-year prohibition on use of rental housing bidding platforms.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125840June 18, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fair housing; establishing a one-year prohibition on use of rental housing bidding platforms; amending Section 7.24.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 7.24.090 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to land use and zoning, amending page 52 of the Official Land Use Map, Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 23.32, to rezone….CB 119510 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to land use and zoning, amending page 52 of the Official Land Use Map, Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 23.32, to rezone….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125842June 18, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to land use and zoning, amending page 52 of the Official Land Use Map, Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 23.32, to rezone property at the Fort Lawton Army Reserve Center.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to conforming City code to match provisions of state law for rental housing inspections.CB 119546 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to conforming City code to match provisions of state law for rental housing inspections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125851June 28, 2019
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to conforming City code to match provisions of state law for rental housing inspections; and amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 22.214.050.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning, amending Sections 23.44.011, 23.44.014, 23.44.017, 23.44.020, 23.44.041, 23.45.545, 23.84A.002, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.038, and 23.86.007 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 119544 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates land use and zoning, amending Sections 23.44.011, 23.44.014, 23.44.017, 23.44.020, 23.44.041, 23.45.545, 23.84A.002, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.038, and 23.86.007 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125854July 9, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, amending Sections 23.44.011, 23.44.014, 23.44.017, 23.44.020, 23.44.041, 23.45.545, 23.84A.002, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.038, and 23.86.007 of the Seattle Municipal Code to remove barriers to the creation of attached and detached accessory dwelling units and add a floor area ratio requirement in certain single-family zones.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 budget.CB 119547 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125855July 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a Community Service Officer program; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 budget; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 23.55.002, 23.55.003, 23.55.005, and 23.84A.036.CB 119543 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 23.55.002, 23.55.003, 23.55.005, and 23.84A.036.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125869July 26, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) Sections 23.55.002, 23.55.003, 23.55.005, and 23.84A.036; and adding new SMC Sections 23.55.052, 23.55.054, 23.55.056, 23.55.057, 23.55.058, and 23.55.060; to establish a sign overlay district and sign regulations for the Seattle Center, including regulations for subareas containing the Seattle Center Arena and the Bressi Garage block.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 2318 NE 125th St.CB 119570 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 2318 NE 125th St.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125871July 26, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 2318 NE 125th St.; authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks & Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring owners of certain multi-family rental housing to notify the Seattle Office of Housing, the Seattle Housing Authority, and tenants of the….CB 119537 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable Housing Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requiring owners of certain multi-family rental housing to notify the Seattle Office of Housing, the Seattle Housing Authority, and tenants of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125873August 2, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the sale of low-income housing; requiring owners of certain multi-family rental housing to notify the Seattle Office of Housing, the Seattle Housing Authority, and tenants of the owner’s proposed sale of that housing; and amending Sections 22.907.030 and 22.907.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Clarifying the definition of vessel and consistently using the term vessel in the Shoreline Master Program.CB 119471 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Clarifying the definition of vessel and consistently using the term vessel in the Shoreline Master Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125882August 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; clarifying the definition of vessel and consistently using the term vessel in the Shoreline Master Program; and amending Sections 23.60A.204, 23.60A.916, and 23.60A.942 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 7900 10th Avenue South.CB 119582 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 7900 10th Avenue South.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125877August 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 7900 10th Avenue South; authorizing acceptance of a recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,175,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks & Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to creating a fund for Sweetened Beverage Tax revenues.CB 119551 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to creating a fund for Sweetened Beverage Tax revenues.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125886August 12, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to creating a fund for Sweetened Beverage Tax revenues; adding a new Section 5.53.055 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and providing additional guidelines for expending proceeds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Authorizing, in 2019, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119574 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPoliceParks & RecreationElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2019, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125894August 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceParks & RecreationElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2019, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Seattle Police Department, Seattle City Light, and the Department of Parks and Recreation to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,923,339. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a 15-year lease with Cascade Public Media governing the City’s continued use….CB 119599 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a 15-year lease with Cascade Public Media governing the City’s continued use….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125892August 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s continued use of Cascade Public Media’s Capitol Hill transmission site and tower; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a 15-year lease with Cascade Public Media governing the City’s continued use of the transmission site and tower for radio equipment and associated antennae; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $290,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Finance and Administrative Services/Seattle Information Technology Dept.. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2019.CB 119595 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2019.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125891August 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Technology Matching Fund; making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2019; and allowing that any unspent funds from an individual project may be applied to another project that meets the goals of the Digital Equity Initiative.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle IT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes a large solar program for customers with solar photovoltaic systems sized larger than 100 kilowatts and not greater than two megawatts.CB 119516 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a large solar program for customers with solar photovoltaic systems sized larger than 100 kilowatts and not greater than two megawatts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125903September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing a large solar program for customers with solar photovoltaic systems sized larger than 100 kilowatts and not greater than two megawatts; and adding a new Section 21.49.083 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $15,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a 2019 Citywide Position List.CB 119577 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2019 Citywide Position List.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125905September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adopting a 2019 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law.CB 119584 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125901September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential rental properties; conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law; amending Sections 7.24.020, 7.24.030, 22.202.080, 22.206.160, 22.206.180, 22.210.030, and 22.902.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the property located at 1314, 1326, and 1336 Yakima Avenue South (“PMA 1594”) surplus to the City’s needs.CB 119603 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the property located at 1314, 1326, and 1336 Yakima Avenue South (“PMA 1594”) surplus to the City’s needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125908September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the transfer of City real property for housing development; declaring the property located at 1314, 1326, and 1336 Yakima Avenue South (“PMA 1594”) surplus to the City’s needs; transferring the jurisdiction of this property from the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to the Office of Housing; authorizing its transfer to Homestead Community Land Trust or its designee; and authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing to execute and deliver the contract for transfer of land, deed, and related documents.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $900,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the design for improvements to Victor Steinbrueck Park funded through the 2008 Parks and Green Spaces Levy.Res 31891 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the design for improvements to Victor Steinbrueck Park funded through the 2008 Parks and Green Spaces Levy.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the design for improvements to Victor Steinbrueck Park funded through the 2008 Parks and Green Spaces Levy.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 1902 NE 98th Street.CB 119616 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 1902 NE 98th Street.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125914September 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 1902 NE 98th Street; authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $900,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks & Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119597 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningHistoric Preservation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125927September 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningHistoric Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.41.012, 23.48.220, 23.48.225, and 23.48.245 of the Seattle Municipal Code, to revise existing regulatory incentives to preserve open space and allow departures from tower separation requirements when the project includes a Landmark that is subject to Landmark controls and incentives adopted by the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Emergency consultant contracts.CB 119642 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Emergency consultant contracts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125920September 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City emergency purchases of goods and services; emergency consultant contracts; and emergency public works contracting; amending Section 10.02.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code to align with current practices and the procedures in subsections 3.39.020.M and 20.50.090.A and Section 20.60.114.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services (FAS). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Related to appropriations for the Human Services Department.CB 119629 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to appropriations for the Human Services Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125921September 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to appropriations for the Human Services Department; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,728,468. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Updates land use and zoning, amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 60 and 61 of the Official Land….CB 119651 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates land use and zoning, amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 60 and 61 of the Official Land….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125933September 25, 2019
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 60 and 61 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 4730 15th Avenue NE from Lowrise 3 (M) (LR3 (M)) to Neighborhood Commercial 2-65 (M1) (NC2-65 (M1)), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Matt Driscoll, C.F. 314359, SDCI Project 3025193-LU)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed3 not voting
Establishes citation authority for the Seattle Fire Department.CB 119650 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMS Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes citation authority for the Seattle Fire Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125948October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMS
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to violations of and compliance with the Seattle Fire Code; establishing citation authority for the Seattle Fire Department; amending Sections 108, 109, 202, 901, and 902 and Appendix A of the 2015 Seattle Fire Code as adopted by Section 22.600.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code and as regulated and allowed by the State Building Code Act, Chapter 19.27 of the Revised Code of Washington; and amending Sections 3.02.125 and 3.16.320 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $90,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Fire Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Authorizes the Superintendent to amend the existing ten-year lease with Seattle Children’s PlayGarden to add a third additional extended term of five….CB 119648 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent to amend the existing ten-year lease with Seattle Children’s PlayGarden to add a third additional extended term of five….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125941October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent to amend the existing ten-year lease with Seattle Children’s PlayGarden to add a third additional extended term of five years.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $420,172. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed3 not voting
Making updates to regulations for cafés in the public place.CB 119622 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Making updates to regulations for cafés in the public place.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125946October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to pedestrian and business interactions in the public place; making updates to regulations for cafés in the public place; making updates to pedestrian clearance standards to align with existing standards and amendments to clarify regulations; making technical corrections; and amending Chapter 15.16 and Sections 15.02.042, 15.02.044, 15.02.046, 15.02.048, 15.04.035, 15.04.060, 15.04.070, 15.17.005, 15.17.006, 15.17.007, 15.17.008, 15.17.009, 15.17.100, 15.17.120, 15.17.130, 15.17.150, 15.17.152, 15.17.200, 15.32.200, and 15.32.250 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $23,375. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation (SDOT). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Assessing citation penalties based on land use zoning and permit type.CB 119652 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Assessing citation penalties based on land use zoning and permit type.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125945October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to citations and penalties in the Street and Sidewalk Use code; assessing citation penalties based on land use zoning and permit type; adding citation fee amounts to the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule; granting authority to annually adjust citation penalty fees; and amending Sections 15.91.016 and 15.91.030 and repealing Section 15.91.025 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $362,750. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Updates the sale and use of tobacco and marijuana products to and by minors.CB 119636 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the sale and use of tobacco and marijuana products to and by minors.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125937October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the sale and use of tobacco and marijuana products to and by minors; amending Sections 6.240.010 and 6.240.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 12A.20.110 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLaw. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Updates crimes and offenses concerning animals.CB 119637 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates crimes and offenses concerning animals.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125938October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to crimes and offenses concerning animals; amending Section 9.25.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLaw. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Repealing Chapter 14.25 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119654 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Repealing Chapter 14.25 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125939October 4, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to hotel employees’ health and safety; repealing Chapter 14.25 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 3.15.000 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law.CB 119653 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125944October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s traffic code; conforming the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law; amending Sections 11.14.055, 11.14.184, 11.14.333, 11.14.360, 11.14.710, 11.20.347, 11.22.070, 11.22.160, 11.22.200, 11.30.040, 11.31.050, 11.31.115, 11.40.220, 11.44.120, 11.53.020, 11.53.230, 11.56.140, 11.58.198, 11.58.272, 11.60.130, 11.72.040, 11.80.080, 11.82.360, and 11.82.560 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding new Sections 11.14.321 and 11.14.378 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLaw. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Requiring certain notices to contain a reference to City landlord-tenant information and resources.CB 119619 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requiring certain notices to contain a reference to City landlord-tenant information and resources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125952October 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to notices to residential rental tenants; requiring certain notices to contain a reference to City landlord-tenant information and resources; and amending Section 22.206.180 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring receipts and non-electronic payment options.CB 119620 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requiring receipts and non-electronic payment options.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125953October 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential rent payments; requiring receipts and non-electronic payment options; and amending Section 7.24.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring compliance with the Rental Registration and Inspection Ordinance before issuing notices to terminate a tenancy.CB 119621 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requiring compliance with the Rental Registration and Inspection Ordinance before issuing notices to terminate a tenancy.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125954October 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to termination of residential rental tenancies; requiring compliance with the Rental Registration and Inspection Ordinance before issuing notices to terminate a tenancy; and amending Sections 22.206.160 and 22.214.075 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Restricting a landlord’s ability to limit the number of persons residing in a rental unit.CB 119606 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Restricting a landlord’s ability to limit the number of persons residing in a rental unit.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125950October 11, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to rental properties; restricting a landlord’s ability to limit the number of persons residing in a rental unit; prohibiting the use of conditions that are applied to persons residing in a rental unit who are not tenants; and amending Sections 7.24.020 and 7.24.030 of, and adding new Sections 7.24.031 and 7.24.032 to, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Relieving a tenant experiencing domestic violence, sexual assault, unlawful harassment, or stalking from liability for damage to the landlord’s property caused by….CB 119658 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Relieving a tenant experiencing domestic violence, sexual assault, unlawful harassment, or stalking from liability for damage to the landlord’s property caused by….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125951October 11, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to rental agreements; relieving a tenant experiencing domestic violence, sexual assault, unlawful harassment, or stalking from liability for damage to the landlord’s property caused by a perpetrator of domestic violence, sexual assault, unlawful harassment, or stalking; creating a landlord mitigation program; and amending Sections 7.24.020, 7.24.030, and 22.206.170 of, and adding new Section 7.24.033 to, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates emergency assistance for low-income City Light Department and Seattle Public Utilities Department customers.CB 119659 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates emergency assistance for low-income City Light Department and Seattle Public Utilities Department customers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125959October 11, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to emergency assistance for low-income City Light Department and Seattle Public Utilities Department customers; amending Sections 21.49.042 and 21.76.065 of the Seattle Municipal Code to expand and align eligibility and assistance guidelines for emergency assistance programs.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $344,934. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 159 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 119664 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 159 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125962October 14, 2019
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 159 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 5256 Rainier Avenue S from Neighborhood Commercial 2-55 (M) (NC2-55 (M)) to Neighborhood Commercial 2-65 (M1) (NC2-65 (M1)); and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Kathleen Justice, C.F. 314365, SDCI Project 3025493-LU)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates environmental review.CB 119600 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates environmental review.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125964October 18, 2019
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco, Mike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to environmental review; amending Sections 3.02.110, 25.05.035, 25.05.055, 25.05.070, 25.05.100, 25.05.440, 25.05.448, 25.05.545, 25.05.680, 25.05.800, 25.05.900, and 25.05.914 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify timelines and the content of administrative appeals, to authorize the development of Director’s Rules to clarify the content of environmental documents, and to make corrections and technical amendments.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Acknowledging the inherent responsibility of the City to reduce unnecessary justice system involvement.Res 31916 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Acknowledging the inherent responsibility of the City to reduce unnecessary justice system involvement.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 25, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION acknowledging the inherent responsibility of the City to reduce unnecessary justice system involvement; acknowledging that pre-arrest diversion programs, such as the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program, represent a harm reduction, evidence-based approach to reduce recidivism and provide for the public safety; and declaring that the City is committed to ensuring that evidence-based, law enforcement-engaged, pre-booking diversion programs, such as LEAD, receive the funding necessary to accept all priority qualifying referrals.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a spending plan for the proceeds of the Seattle Transportation Network Company tax to provide support to affordable housing near frequent….Res 31914 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a spending plan for the proceeds of the Seattle Transportation Network Company tax to provide support to affordable housing near frequent….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 26, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting a spending plan for the proceeds of the Seattle Transportation Network Company tax to provide support to affordable housing near frequent transit, transportation, and a driver conflict resolution center.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of a new interlocal agreement with King County for operation and maintenance of the Seattle Streetcar system.CB 119704 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a new interlocal agreement with King County for operation and maintenance of the Seattle Streetcar system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126003December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Streetcar; authorizing execution of a new interlocal agreement with King County for operation and maintenance of the Seattle Streetcar system; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,550,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates public works and improvements.CB 119697 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates public works and improvements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125974December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to public works and improvements; amending Sections 20.04.090 and 20.04.270 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOWCP. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Retitling Chapter 3.124, amending Sections 3.124.010, 3.124.020, and 3.124.040, and repealing Sections 3.124.030 and 3.124.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119688 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Retitling Chapter 3.124, amending Sections 3.124.010, 3.124.020, and 3.124.040, and repealing Sections 3.124.030 and 3.124.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125998December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to an employee giving program for City employees; retitling Chapter 3.124, amending Sections 3.124.010, 3.124.020, and 3.124.040, and repealing Sections 3.124.030 and 3.124.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $712,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125716 to extend an interfund loan from the Move Seattle Levy Fund to the Seattle Streetcar Operations Fund.CB 119680 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125716 to extend an interfund loan from the Move Seattle Levy Fund to the Seattle Streetcar Operations Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125993December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Seattle Streetcar operations; amending Ordinance 125716 to extend an interfund loan from the Move Seattle Levy Fund to the Seattle Streetcar Operations Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,650,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizing, in 2019, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119667 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSYouth & Education Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2019, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125980December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2019, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Education and Early Learning, Seattle Police Department, Seattle Department of Transportation, and the Seattle Fire Department, to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,991,652. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the Traffic Code.CB 119699 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to the Traffic Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125994December 2, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the Traffic Code; amending Section 11.23.150 of the Seattle Municipal Code to amend the fee schedule for the free-floating car sharing program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1,730. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed1 not voting
Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764 on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of any application to establish….CB 119696 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764 on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of any application to establish….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126006December 13, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; extending for six months a moratorium established by Ordinance 125764 on the filing, acceptance, processing, and/or approval of any application to establish a new principal or accessory use, or change a principal or accessory use, for any site currently used as a mobile home park, as defined in Section 23.84A.032 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a language premium and authorizing pay for certain scheduling changes.CB 119715 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a language premium and authorizing pay for certain scheduling changes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126010December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to compensation and benefits for certain City employees; authorizing a language premium and authorizing pay for certain scheduling changes; setting certain employee parking rates; amending Sections 4.20.055, 4.20.325, 4.28.010, 4.28.020, and 4.34.065 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); adding new Sections 4.20.360 and 4.20.365 to the SMC; repealing Section 4.34.045 of the SMC; amending Ordinance 119758, last amended by Ordinance 124052; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Stating the City Council’s intent to consider legislation in 2020 that would expand Chapter 14.30 of the Seattle Municipal Code to require….Res 31921 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransitPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Stating the City Council’s intent to consider legislation in 2020 that would expand Chapter 14.30 of the Seattle Municipal Code to require….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 16, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION stating the City Council’s intent to consider legislation in 2020 that would expand Chapter 14.30 of the Seattle Municipal Code to require employers to provide employees with transit subsidies, and to consult with City of Seattle departments and relevant stakeholders in the development of such legislation and related policies.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Pier 54, LLC permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian walkway and a covered patio, including benches, tables, food preparation and….CB 119154 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Pier 54, LLC permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian walkway and a covered patio, including benches, tables, food preparation and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125505January 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Pier 54, LLC permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian walkway and a covered patio, including benches, tables, food preparation and serving areas, outdoor lighting, pedestrian deck, pilings, and other related appurtenant structures in the public place on the north side of Madison Street, west of Alaskan Way, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $36,968. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Lakefront Investors 2 LLC permission to construct, install, and maintain four sets of private communication conduits under and across Boren Avenue….CB 119159 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Lakefront Investors 2 LLC permission to construct, install, and maintain four sets of private communication conduits under and across Boren Avenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125506January 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Lakefront Investors 2 LLC permission to construct, install, and maintain four sets of private communication conduits under and across Boren Avenue North, north of Mercer Street, and under and across the alley between Boren Avenue North and Fairview Avenue North, north of Mercer Street, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the regulation of marijuana businesses.CB 119178 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the regulation of marijuana businesses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125516January 19, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the regulation of marijuana businesses; amending Sections 6.500.020, 6.500.030, 6.500.040, 6.500.050, 6.500.060, 6.500.070, 6.500.080, 6.500.110, 6.500.160, and 6.500.170 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Section 6.500.143 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates housing regulations.CB 119179 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates housing regulations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125515January 19, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to housing regulations; amending Sections 14.09.020 and 14.09.025 of the Seattle Municipal Code as adopted in Ordinance 125393 to correct references and clarify notice provisions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports The City of Seattle’s proposal to be a host city for the 2026 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup.Res 31791 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports The City of Seattle’s proposal to be a host city for the 2026 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 19, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting The City of Seattle’s proposal to be a host city for the 2026 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119146 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125518January 22, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.42.106 and 23.42.118 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); to modify standards for the expansion of nonconforming uses and structures.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Swedish Health Services permission to continue operating and maintaining a pedestrian tunnel under and across Minor Avenue, between Columbia Street and….CB 119189 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Swedish Health Services permission to continue operating and maintaining a pedestrian tunnel under and across Minor Avenue, between Columbia Street and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125529February 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Swedish Health Services permission to continue operating and maintaining a pedestrian tunnel under and across Minor Avenue, between Columbia Street and Marion Street, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $9,936. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of “Amendment No. 7 to the Construction Services Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Seattle Relating to the….CB 119190 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of “Amendment No. 7 to the Construction Services Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Seattle Relating to the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125530February 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit); authorizing execution of “Amendment No. 7 to the Construction Services Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Seattle Relating to the University Link, North Link, and East Link Projects”; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,045,580. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 90 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 119194 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 90 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125531February 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 90 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 1600 Dexter Ave N from Neighborhood Commercial 3 with a pedestrian designation and a 40-foot height limit to Neighborhood Commercial 3 with a pedestrian designation, a 75-foot height limit, and the MHA suffix. (Petition by Brook V LLC, C.F. 314358, SDCI Project 3021980)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 3656 34th Avenue South.CB 119185 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 3656 34th Avenue South.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125537March 8, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Propertyfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 3656 34th Avenue South; authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; authorizing acquisition by condemnation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants City Investors XXV LLC permission to construct, install, and maintain two sets of private communication conduits under and across 8th Avenue….CB 119204 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants City Investors XXV LLC permission to construct, install, and maintain two sets of private communication conduits under and across 8th Avenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125539March 16, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting City Investors XXV LLC permission to construct, install, and maintain two sets of private communication conduits under and across 8th Avenue North, south of Harrison Street and north of Thomas Street, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,614. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.CB 119193 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125545March 30, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Fourth Quarter 2017 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; returning positions to Civil Service status; amending Section 4.13.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; transferring a position; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a one-year prohibition on use of rental housing bidding platforms.CB 119198 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a one-year prohibition on use of rental housing bidding platforms.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125551March 30, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fair housing; establishing a one-year prohibition on use of rental housing bidding platforms; requesting a study of rental housing bidding platforms; amending Section 7.24.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 7.24.090 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Phone: CBO Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designees to execute an agreement with the State of Washington to set forth roles and responsibilities….CB 119215 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & StructuresProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designees to execute an agreement with the State of Washington to set forth roles and responsibilities….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125554March 30, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Bridges & StructuresProcurement & Contractsfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the State Route 99 Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designees to execute an agreement with the State of Washington to set forth roles and responsibilities for the State of Washington’s project to decommission the Battery Street Tunnel once the bored tunnel is open to drivers.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Updates the City Light Department.CB 119224 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125555April 11, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Section 21.49.130 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify certain contracting details and add a subsection to the Department’s authority to contract for energy efficiency through conservation efforts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119200 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125562April 13, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.41.006, 23.41.008, and 23.41.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adopt the Central Area Neighborhood Design Guidelines, establish a Central Area Design Review District, and change Design Review Board composition.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedPlanning and Community Dev.. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Office of Labor Standards.CB 119220 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates the Office of Labor Standards.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125559April 13, 2018
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Office of Labor Standards; amending Section 14.19.025 of the Seattle Municipal Code to remove the authority to pay a subminimum wage to people with disabilities as set forth in RCW 49.46.060(2).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of a project administration agreement between Sound Transit and The City of Seattle for the West Seattle and Ballard Link….CB 119229 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a project administration agreement between Sound Transit and The City of Seattle for the West Seattle and Ballard Link….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125563April 13, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (“Sound Transit”); authorizing execution of a project administration agreement between Sound Transit and The City of Seattle for the West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,101,050. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning, amending Sections 7.24.020, 7.24.030, 23.42.040, 23.44.030, 23.45.504, 23.45.506, 23.45.508, 23.45.536, 23.45.570, 23.46.002, 23.46.004, 23.46.022, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.006, 23.47A.013….CB 119221 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originTransitTraffic SafetyZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning, amending Sections 7.24.020, 7.24.030, 23.42.040, 23.44.030, 23.45.504, 23.45.506, 23.45.508, 23.45.536, 23.45.570, 23.46.002, 23.46.004, 23.46.022, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.006, 23.47A.013….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125558April 13, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
TransitTraffic SafetyZoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, amending Sections 7.24.020, 7.24.030, 23.42.040, 23.44.030, 23.45.504, 23.45.506, 23.45.508, 23.45.536, 23.45.570, 23.46.002, 23.46.004, 23.46.022, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.006, 23.47A.013, 23.47A.032, 23.48.020, 23.48.085, 23.48.205, 23.48.280, 23.48.605, 23.48.705, 23.49.019, 23.49.042, 23.49.044, 23.49.045, 23.49.046, 23.49.090, 23.49.094, 23.49.096, 23.49.142, 23.49.146, 23.49.148, 23.49.180, 23.49.322, 23.49.324, 23.49.338, 23.50.012, 23.50.028, 23.51A.004, 23.54.015, 23.54.016, 23.54.020, 23.54.025, 23.54.030, 23.61.008, 23.66.122, 23.66.124, 23.66.320, 23.66.324, 23.66.342, 23.71.014, 23.74.008, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.76.032, 23.84A.030, 23.84A.038, and 25.05.675 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); repealing Section 23.71.016 of the SMC; and adding new Sections 23.42.070, 23.54.026, and 23.54.027 to the SMC; in order to promote transportation options, update the definition of “frequent transit service,” update bicycle parking requirements, update parking space standards, update SEPA environmental review parking policies, and make clarifications.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute contracts with Recology King County and Waste Management of Washington, for solid….CB 119231 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid Waste Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute contracts with Recology King County and Waste Management of Washington, for solid….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125565April 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute contracts with Recology King County and Waste Management of Washington, for solid waste collection and transfer services; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the 2016 Housing Levy Acquisition and Preservation Program as described in Ordinance 125028.CB 119236 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies the 2016 Housing Levy Acquisition and Preservation Program as described in Ordinance 125028.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125571April 27, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingBudget & Appropriationsfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to low-income housing; modifying the 2016 Housing Levy Acquisition and Preservation Program as described in Ordinance 125028; amending the Administrative and Financial Plan for the 2016 Housing Levy and the Housing Funding Policies for the 2016 Housing Levy and other fund sources, each as adopted by Ordinance 125308; amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), by revising Budget Summary Level Purpose Statements; authorizing the Director of Housing to use 2016 Housing Levy funds to acquire options; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Subsection 21.49.130.B of the Seattle Municipal Code to extend the Department’s authority to execute, implement, and administer contracts for periods of….CB 119238 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Subsection 21.49.130.B of the Seattle Municipal Code to extend the Department’s authority to execute, implement, and administer contracts for periods of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125575May 4, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Subsection 21.49.130.B of the Seattle Municipal Code to extend the Department’s authority to execute, implement, and administer contracts for periods of up to 60 months for wholesale marketing activity.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends the amount of time available to a person to file a charge with the Office for Civil Rights regarding unfair employment….CB 119240 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends the amount of time available to a person to file a charge with the Office for Civil Rights regarding unfair employment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125576May 11, 2018
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Human Rights code; extending the amount of time available to a person to file a charge with the Office for Civil Rights regarding unfair employment, public accommodations, and contracting processes; specifying that discrimination includes harassment; and amending Sections 14.04.030, 14.04.090, 14.06.020, 14.06.050, 14.08.020, 14.10.020, and 14.10.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to enter into a lease agreement with MB Warehouse, LLC, a Washington limited liability….CB 119249 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to enter into a lease agreement with MB Warehouse, LLC, a Washington limited liability….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125580May 16, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a lease agreement for warehouse space; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to enter into a lease agreement with MB Warehouse, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, for warehouse space in the building located at 2021 22nd Avenue South; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle both temporary….CB 119253 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle both temporary….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125584June 1, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewaterfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle both temporary and permanent property rights from owners of property located along the alignment of a planned, combined sewage conveyance pipe and a sewage storage facility near the east side of I-5 between South Dawson Street and South Lucile Street, which are necessary or convenient to construct, operate, and maintain structures related to the Pearl Street Drainage & Wastewater (DWW) Improvement Project, through negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation); placing the real property rights acquired under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities and designating the property rights acquired for utility and general municipal purposes; authorizing payment of all other costs associated with acquisition; and authorizing construction within the City right-of-way.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to land use and zoning.CB 119237 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125587June 1, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to land use and zoning; adding a new Section 23.41.022 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) and amending Section 23.76.005 of the SMC, to clarify the relationship between design review and review of street vacation petitions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Council. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the Seattle Design Commission.CB 119234 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to the Seattle Design Commission.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125586June 1, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the Seattle Design Commission; amending Sections 3.58.010, 3.58.030, 3.58.050, 3.58.080, 3.58.090, and 22.900G.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and adding a new Section 3.58.100 to the SMC; to clarify the role of the Seattle Design Commission in reviewing petitions for long-term or permanent use of the public right-of-way and to set fees for Design Commission review of such projects.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Council. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Ethics Code.CB 119254 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Ethics Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125589June 1, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Ethics Code; amending Sections 4.16.030 and 4.16.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code; requiring elected officials to disclose financial interests in legislative matters prior to participating in those matters; and creating a limited exception to the requirement that elected officials disqualify themselves from participating in such matters.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments.CB 119269 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125603June 22, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; correcting typographical errors, correcting section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments; amending Sections 22.206.130, 23.24.040, 23.28.020, 23.28.030, 23.30.020, 23.41.004, 23.41.012, 23.42.040, 23.42.048, 23.44.006, 23.44.008, 23.44.010, 23.44.012, 23.44.014, 23.44.016, 23.44.022, 23.44.041, 23.45.510, 23.45.514, 23.45.518, 23.45.536, 23.45.545, 23.45.570, 23.46.002, 23.47A.008, 23.47A.009, 23.47A.013, 23.47A.014, 23.47A.016, 23.48.005, 23.48.020, 23.48.220, 23.48.225, 23.48.231, 23.48.240, 23.48.245, 23.48.250, 23.48.620, 23.48.640, 23.48.645, 23.48.722, 23.48.735, 23.49.008, 23.49.011, 23.49.015, 23.49.023, 23.49.032, 23.49.106, 23.49.108, 23.49.164, 23.50.014, 23.50.016, 23.50.030, 23.50.032, 23.51A.002, 23.53.015, 23.53.030, 23.54.015, 23.54.030, 23.61.014, 23.66.030, 23.66.332, 23.72.004, 23.73.024, 23.75.085, 23.75.160, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.76.012, 23.76.022, 23.76.028, 23.76.034, 23.84A.002, 23.84A.004, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.046, 23.86.002, 23.86.006, 23.86.007, 23.86.032, 25.05.030, 25.05.610, 25.05.800, 25.08.940, 25.09.090, 25.11.070, and 25.11.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Section 23.22.059 to the Seattle Municipal Code; repealing Section 23.50.029 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Section 510 of the 2015 Seattle Building Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes an alternative enforcement 75-foot standard for determining excessive vehicle noise.CB 119277 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes an alternative enforcement 75-foot standard for determining excessive vehicle noise.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125602June 22, 2018
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to noise control; establishing an alternative enforcement 75-foot standard for determining excessive vehicle noise; and amending Section 25.08.430 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Updates rules for parking.CB 119291 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates rules for parking.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125609June 29, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to parking; defining “blockface;” updating the definition of “parking payment device;” defining “pay-to-park signage;” allowing the Traffic Engineer to establish areas where parking is regulated by pay-to-park signage and to authorize additional methods of payment for parking; amending the description of certain parking penalties; amending parking and payment requirements; making technical changes; amending Sections 11.14.425, 11.16.300, 11.31.121, 11.76.005, 11.76.015, 11.76.020, and 11.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding new Sections 11.14.062 and 11.14.438 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 11.76.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125471, which conditioned the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2018 grant applications.CB 119292 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 125471, which conditioned the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2018 grant applications.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125610June 29, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125471, which conditioned the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2018 grant applications.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to land use and zoning.CB 119252 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125612July 6, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to land use and zoning; establishing an incentive program for high performance buildings in urban centers; amending Sections 23.40.060, 23.41.004, 23.41.012, and 23.41.014 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and adding a new Section 23.40.070 to the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedConstruction and Inspections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Raising limits of certain items on the statement of financial affairs in conformity with state law.CB 119279 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Raising limits of certain items on the statement of financial affairs in conformity with state law.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125611July 6, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to elections; raising limits of certain items on the statement of financial affairs in conformity with state law; changing deadlines and definitions related to the democracy voucher program to align better with other state and City practices; creating a crime of falsifying democracy voucher program qualification information; making technical corrections to and reorganizing and clarifying the content of the democracy voucher program; and amending Sections 2.04.165 and 2.04.370 and Chapter 2.04, Subchapter VIII of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $34,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedEthics and Elections. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Increasing the maximum penalty for failure to report a lost or stolen firearm.CB 119267 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Increasing the maximum penalty for failure to report a lost or stolen firearm.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125621July 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the reporting of lost or stolen firearms; increasing the maximum penalty for failure to report a lost or stolen firearm; adding legal presumptions and defenses regarding compliance or failure to comply with Section 10.78.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Section 10.78.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding new Sections 10.78.020, 10.78.030, and 10.78.040 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
To initiate a SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area.RES 31823 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

To initiate a SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION to initiate a SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $987,462. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedEconomic Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute an amended and restated lease between the City of Seattle and Oiselle Running….CB 119299 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute an amended and restated lease between the City of Seattle and Oiselle Running….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125628July 27, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute an amended and restated lease between the City of Seattle and Oiselle Running, Inc. to occupy and use a portion of Building 11 at Warren G. Magnuson Park for general office purposes; and superseding the requirements of Ordinance 118477 for the purposes of this ordinance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $867,648. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 159 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 119303 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 159 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125632July 30, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 159 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 5201 Rainier Avenue South from Neighborhood Commercial 2 with 40-foot height limit (NC2-40) to Neighborhood Commercial 3 with a 65-foot height limit and a M1 suffix (NC3-65(M1)), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Hugh Schaeffer, S+H Works, LLC, C.F. 314311, SDCI Project 3018378)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a Free-Floating Bike Share Program Fee Schedule.CB 119305 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksTraffic SafetyBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a Free-Floating Bike Share Program Fee Schedule.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125634August 3, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksTraffic SafetyBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use fees; adopting a Free-Floating Bike Share Program Fee Schedule; and amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), by increasing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,009,216. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Municipal Art Fund.CB 119298 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & Culture Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Municipal Art Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125636August 3, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Municipal Art Fund; amending Section 20.32.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to remove the timing limitation on the use of funding.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Office of Arts & Culture. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding Section 8 or other subsidy program administrator to the definition of person.CB 119316 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adding Section 8 or other subsidy program administrator to the definition of person.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125639August 7, 2018
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Human Rights Code; adding Section 8 or other subsidy program administrator to the definition of person; clarifying the difference between reasonable accommodation and reasonable modification; broadening coverage of unfair practices related to reasonable accommodations and reasonable modifications to any person; and amending Sections 14.08.020 and 14.08.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 920 Randolph Avenue.CB 119315 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 920 Randolph Avenue.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125644August 17, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 920 Randolph Avenue; authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $995,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119321 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125645August 17, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475), including the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); reallocating funding from the Acquisition Category to the Opportunity Fund Category of the 2008 Parks and Green Spaces Levy; and revising project allocations in the 2018-2023 CIP; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Section 21.49.095 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119319 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adding a new Section 21.49.095 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125648August 17, 2018
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department’s Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Program; adding a new Section 21.49.095 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Swedish Health Services permission to continue operating and maintaining a pedestrian tunnel under and across Cherry Street, between Minor Avenue and….CB 119304 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Swedish Health Services permission to continue operating and maintaining a pedestrian tunnel under and across Cherry Street, between Minor Avenue and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125655August 24, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Swedish Health Services permission to continue operating and maintaining a pedestrian tunnel under and across Cherry Street, between Minor Avenue and Broadway for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $12,400. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Adopts a 2018 Citywide Position List.CB 119312 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2018 Citywide Position List.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125652August 24, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adopting a 2018 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Updates The City of Seattle’s Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan.CB 119310 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceOrigin unclearCompensation & Benefits Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Updates The City of Seattle’s Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125651August 24, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan; amending Section 2.5 of the Deferred Compensation Plan to clarify existing immunity from liability for offering certain investment options.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2018.CB 119328 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2018.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125654August 24, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Technology Matching Fund Program; making allocations and authorizing implementation of certain Technology Matching Fund projects in 2018; providing that 2018 appropriations for the Technology Matching Fund from the Cable TV Franchise Fund and from the Information Technology Fund shall automatically carry forward into the 2019 fiscal year; allowing that any unspent funds from an individual project may be applied to another project that meets the goals of the Digital Equity Initiative; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle IT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Chapter 25.24 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adopt an interim boundary expansion for the Pike Place Market Historical District.CB 119330 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Chapter 25.24 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adopt an interim boundary expansion for the Pike Place Market Historical District.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125650August 24, 2018
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant, Sally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Pike Place Market Historical District; amending Chapter 25.24 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adopt an interim boundary expansion for the Pike Place Market Historical District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to acquire real property and property rights within the City’s green spaces.CB 119340 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to acquire real property and property rights within the City’s green spaces.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125664September 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Park District; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to acquire real property and property rights within the City’s green spaces.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Broadening coverage of unfair practices to include domestic workers and hiring entities.CB 119351 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Broadening coverage of unfair practices to include domestic workers and hiring entities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125668September 21, 2018
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Human Rights Code; broadening coverage of unfair practices to include domestic workers and hiring entities; extending protections to domestic workers and extending obligations to hiring entities; amending Sections 14.04.020 and 14.04.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and adding a new Section 14.04.230 to the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $75,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Finding that City ownership of the Property no longer serves municipal purposes.CB 119357 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Finding that City ownership of the Property no longer serves municipal purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125667September 21, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the sale of lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 7 of the Latona Addition to the City of Seattle, as per plat recorded in Volume 4 of Plats, on page 28, records of King County (the “Property”); finding that City ownership of the Property no longer serves municipal purposes; amending Ordinance 96106; authorizing the sale of the Property for not less than $2,575,000; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute all documents and take other necessary actions to complete the Property’s sale; directing the deposit of the net sale proceeds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,575,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125376 and Chapter 14.18 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119218 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 125376 and Chapter 14.18 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125679October 5, 2018
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; amending Ordinance 125376 and Chapter 14.18 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a new SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area (BIA).CB 119297 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a new SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area (BIA).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125678October 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing a new SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area (BIA); levying special assessments upon owners of business, multi-family residential, and mixed-use properties within the area; providing for the deposit of revenues in a special account and expenditures therefrom; providing for collection of and penalties for delinquencies; providing for the establishment of a Ratepayers Advisory Board; providing for an implementation agreement with a program manager; providing for the continuity of services and the distribution of remaining funds from the current SoDo BIA account that was established in 2013 by Ordinance 124306; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $987,462. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedEconomic Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119332 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125680October 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.41.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code to approve the 2018 South Lake Union Neighborhood Design Guidelines.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $8,290. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Pertaining to Admission Tax revenue received by the City.CB 119344 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Pertaining to Admission Tax revenue received by the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125672October 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE pertaining to Admission Tax revenue received by the City; amending Section 5.40.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code to revise uses of Admission Tax revenue.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119333 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125681October 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksZoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 11.14.150, 23.53.006, 23.53.015, 23.53.020, 23.84A.002, 23.84A.006, and 23.84A.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code for pedestrian access and circulation and to make corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119338 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125675October 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Parks and Recreation, Human Services Department, Seattle Information Technology Department, Seattle Fire Department, and Seattle Police Department to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,587,980. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Phone: CBO Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends a moratorium established by Ordinance 125425 for six months on the filing, acceptance, or processing of applications for the establishment, expansion….CB 119342 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends a moratorium established by Ordinance 125425 for six months on the filing, acceptance, or processing of applications for the establishment, expansion….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125670October 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; extending a moratorium established by Ordinance 125425 for six months on the filing, acceptance, or processing of applications for the establishment, expansion, or change of use for certain uses on parcels with a Commercial 1, Commercial 2, or Neighborhood Commercial 3 zoning designation within the Aurora-Licton Urban Village; declaring an emergency, and establishing an immediate effective date for this extension; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Pertaining to Admission Tax revenue.CB 119399 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Pertaining to Admission Tax revenue.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125695November 9, 2018
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE pertaining to Admission Tax revenue; amending Section 5.40.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code; making technical corrections to Ordinance 125672.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 9.26 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119385 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness Services Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 9.26 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125702November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees charged by the Seattle Animal Shelter; and amending Chapter 9.26 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50,091. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Finance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts business and professional license fees associated with the regulated activities of public parking lots and garages, used goods, adult entertainment, and….CB 119384 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts business and professional license fees associated with the regulated activities of public parking lots and garages, used goods, adult entertainment, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125703November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to regulatory business and professional license fees; adjusting business and professional license fees associated with the regulated activities of public parking lots and garages, used goods, adult entertainment, and marijuana; and amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 6.48.020, 6.204.080, 6.270.060, and 6.500.080.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $457,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Finance and Administrative Service. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising certain policies, establishing a new policy, and requesting a ten-year policy review cycle.Res 31847 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising certain policies, establishing a new policy, and requesting a ten-year policy review cycle.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to financial policies for the Judgment/Claims Fund; revising certain policies, establishing a new policy, and requesting a ten-year policy review cycle.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 122424 to extend an interfund loan from the Move Seattle Levy Fund to the Seattle Streetcar Operations Fund.CB 119380 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 122424 to extend an interfund loan from the Move Seattle Levy Fund to the Seattle Streetcar Operations Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125716November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Seattle Streetcar operations; amending Ordinance 122424 to extend an interfund loan from the Move Seattle Levy Fund to the Seattle Streetcar Operations Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,650,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources (commonly known as the 3rd quarter grant acceptance ordinance).CB 119390 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originFire & EMSYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources (commonly known as the 3rd quarter grant acceptance ordinance).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125698November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2018, acceptance of funding from non-City sources (commonly known as the 3rd quarter grant acceptance ordinance); authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Education and Early Learning, Seattle Fire Department, and Seattle Department of Transportation to accept specified grants, private funding, and subsidized loans and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,299,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates business license tax certificates and business licenses.CB 119405 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates business license tax certificates and business licenses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125720November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to business license tax certificates and business licenses; amending Sections 5.30.030, 5.55.030, and 6.208.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $213,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Conditioning the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2019 grant applications.CB 119401 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Conditioning the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2019 grant applications.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125723November 26, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE conditioning the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2019 grant applications.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes enhanced reporting requirements for the City’s Capital Improvement Program projects and establishing the City’s intent to use a stage-gate appropriation process….Res 31853 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes enhanced reporting requirements for the City’s Capital Improvement Program projects and establishing the City’s intent to use a stage-gate appropriation process….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 26, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
fiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing enhanced reporting requirements for the City’s Capital Improvement Program projects and establishing the City’s intent to use a stage-gate appropriation process for selected projects.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to monitoring and inspecting vacant buildings for compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Building Maintenance Code.CB 119407 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to monitoring and inspecting vacant buildings for compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Building Maintenance Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125727November 30, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to monitoring and inspecting vacant buildings for compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Building Maintenance Code; amending Sections 22.206.200 and 22.208.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Office of Arts and Culture to set fees and charges for all cultural spaces owned or operated….CB 119408 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & Culture Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Office of Arts and Culture to set fees and charges for all cultural spaces owned or operated….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125730December 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Office of Arts and Culture; authorizing the Director of the Office of Arts and Culture to set fees and charges for all cultural spaces owned or operated by the Office of Arts and Culture; and amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 3.14.815.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Arts & Culture. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates an Office of the Employee Ombud.CB 119374 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates an Office of the Employee Ombud.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125735December 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the organization of City government; creating an Office of the Employee Ombud; and adding Sections 3.15.020, 3.15.022, and 3.15.024 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conditional approval of the University of Washington 2018 Seattle Campus Master Plan.CB 119426 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Grants conditional approval of the University of Washington 2018 Seattle Campus Master Plan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125733December 14, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; granting conditional approval of the University of Washington 2018 Seattle Campus Master Plan; and amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) at pages 61, 62, 63, 77, 78, 79, 80, and 81 of the Official Land Use Map.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating positions as exempt from the civil service system.CB 119421 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125740December 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Fourth Quarter 2018 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from the civil service system; and amending Sections 4.13.010 and 4.24.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 9.26 of the Seattle Municipal Code to make technical corrections.CB 119429 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness Services Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 9.26 of the Seattle Municipal Code to make technical corrections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125741December 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to fees charged by the Seattle Animal Shelter; and amending Chapter 9.26 of the Seattle Municipal Code to make technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $11,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Finance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.CB 118887 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125242January 13, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Fourth Quarter 2016 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; amending Section 4.13.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City’s traffic code.CB 118899 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City’s traffic code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125253February 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s traffic code; amending Sections 11.14.660, 11.50.570, 11.56.025, 11.60.240, 11.60.370, 11.60.420, 11.82.180, 11.84.020 and 11.84.400 of the Seattle Municipal Code, adding Sections 11.14.083 and 11.56.050 to the Seattle Municipal Code and repealing Sections 11.86.020 and 11.86.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to conform the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and make technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Updates the City’s criminal code.CB 118900 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City’s criminal code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125254February 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; amending Sections 3.33.030, 12A.08.140, 12A.08.170, 12A.10.150, 12A.14.010, 12A.14.160, and 12A.16.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding Sections 12A.08.165, 12A.08.180, 12A.08.190, and 12A.10.160 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 6.36.010, 6.36.020, 6.36.030, 6.36.040, 6.36.050, 6.36.060, 6.36.070, and 6.36.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code to conform the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and make technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Updates environmentally critical area (ECA) regulations and the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) as it relates to ECAs.CB 118853 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates environmentally critical area (ECA) regulations and the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) as it relates to ECAs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125248February 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to environmentally critical area (ECA) regulations and the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) as it relates to ECAs; amending Sections 21.33.010, 22.170.050, 22.170.210, 22.801.060, 22.801.240, 22.807.020, 22.900C.010, 23.60A.156, 23.60A.160, 23.60A.190, 23.60A.910, 25.05.305, 25.05.800, 25.05.900, 25.06.020, 25.06.040, 25.06.100, 25.06.110, 25.09.010, 25.09.015, 25.09.017, 25.09.030, 25.09.040, 25.09.045, 25.09.060, 25.09.080, 25.09.100, 25.09.110, 25.09.120, 25.09.160, 25.09.200, 25.09.220, 25.09.240, 25.09.260, 25.09.280, 25.09.300, 25.09.330, 25.09.335, 25.09.360, 25.09.380, 25.09.400, 25.09.410, 25.09.420, 25.09.430, 25.09.450, 25.09.460, 25.09.470, 25.09.480, 25.09.520, 25.09.530, 25.11.030, and 25.11.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); renumbering Sections 25.09.020, 25.09.050, 25.09.180, and 25.09.320 of the SMC as 25.09.012, 25.09.042, 25.09.090, and 25.09.070 respectively and amending them; repealing Sections 25.05.747, 25.05.908, and 25.09.055 of the SMC; and adding new Sections 25.09.052, 25.09.065, 25.09.075, and 25.09.290 to the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Section 15.04.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow the Director of Transportation the authority to credit certain use fees in….CB 118896 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Section 15.04.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow the Director of Transportation the authority to credit certain use fees in….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125251February 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Section 15.04.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow the Director of Transportation the authority to credit certain use fees in exchange for voluntary transportation improvements of equal value in the public right-of-way.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124874.CB 118894 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124874.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125249February 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 124874; modifying the use of the open space improvements over and across Utah Avenue South between South Stacy Street and South Lander Street for First and Utah Street Associates, LLC; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,025,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Harmonizing the City Position List and the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118895 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Harmonizing the City Position List and the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125250February 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; harmonizing the City Position List and the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Sections 3.32.010, 3.32.020 and 3.32.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding a new Section 3.32.011 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Designating the Mount Baker McClellan Street Redevelopment Opportunity Zone pursuant to RCW 70.105D.150(1) and making findings in support of such designation.Res 31731 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating the Mount Baker McClellan Street Redevelopment Opportunity Zone pursuant to RCW 70.105D.150(1) and making findings in support of such designation.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 10, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the Mount Baker McClellan Street Redevelopment Opportunity Zone pursuant to RCW 70.105D.150(1) and making findings in support of such designation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Adding Chapter 20.46 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118905 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding Chapter 20.46 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125257February 10, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to strengthening The City of Seattle’s policies for conducting City business with partners that are committed to fair business practices; adding Chapter 20.46 to the Seattle Municipal Code; amending the revised City of Seattle Investment Policies adopted by Resolution 31525; and requesting the Mayor and Director of Finance and Administrative Services to take certain actions, including not renewing the Contract for Bank Depository Services with Wells Fargo Bank beyond the initial term and refraining from making new investments in Wells Fargo securities for a period of three years.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections.CB 118909 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125259February 17, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections; amending Section 22.900C.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,900. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle Public Utilities.CB 118903 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125262February 24, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; repealing Section 5 of Ordinance 125111 and amending Section 21.76.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to correct a technical error.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to submit application(s) for grant funding assistance for Boating Facilities Program project(s) to the Recreation….Res 31736 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to submit application(s) for grant funding assistance for Boating Facilities Program project(s) to the Recreation….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 24, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to submit application(s) for grant funding assistance for Boating Facilities Program project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board as provided in chapter 79A.25 RCW, Title 286 WAC, and other applicable authorities, and to enter into project agreements if grant funding is awarded.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118914 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125267March 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.30.010, 23.45.502, 23.45.510, 23.45.512, 23.45.514, 23.47A.002, 23.47A.009, 23.47A.012, 23.47A.013, 23.48.002, 23.48.005, 23.48.020, 23.48.021, 23.48.025, 23.48.040, 23.48.045, 23.48.055, 23.48.085, 23.48.240, 23.58A.040, 23.58A.042, 23.58B.040, 23.58B.050, 23.58C.030, 23.58C.035, 23.58C.040, 23.58C.050, 23.61.008, 23.61.014, 23.84A.004, 23.84A.025, 23.84A.028, 23.84A.038, 23.84A.042, and 23.84A.048 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); adding new Sections 23.45.509, 23.45.517, 23.47A.017, 23.48.602, 23.48.605, 23.48.610, 23.48.615, 23.48.620, 23.48.621, 23.48.622, 23.48.623, 23.48.624, 23.48.627, 23.48.630, 23.48.635, 23.48.640, 23.48.645, 23.48.646, 23.48.650, 23.48.680, 23.48.685, and 23.48.690 to the SMC; amending Ordinance 125108 and Ordinance 125233; and amending the Official Land Use Map at pages 60, 61, 78, and 79 to rezone areas in the University District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118893 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125272March 10, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 3.58.040, 3.58.060, 23.22.062, 23.24.040, 23.24.045, 23.40.002, 23.41.004, 23.41.012, 23.41.014, 23.44.010, 23.44.012, 23.44.014, 23.44.016, 23.44.022, 23.45.510, 23.45.512, 23.45.514, 23.45.518, 23.45.524, 23.45.528, 23.45.536, 23.45.570, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.005, 23.47A.008, 23.47A.009, 23.47A.012, 23.47A.016, 23.47A.022, 23.48.020, 23.48.025, 23.48.085, 23.48.220, 23.48.245, 23.48.420, 23.49.008, 23.49.011, 23.49.015, 23.49.019, 23.49.028, 23.49.058, 23.49.164, 23.50.020, 23.53.006, 23.53.015, 23.53.030, 23.54.015, 23.54.030, 23.54.040, 23.55.014, 23.55.015, 23.55.020, 23.66.140, 23.66.338, 23.71.044, 23.73.008, 23.73.009, 23.73.014, 23.73.015, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.76.060, 23.84A.024, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.036, 23.84A.038, 23.86.006, 23.86.007, 23.86.028, and 25.11.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 22.202.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code, to correct typographical errors, correct section references, clarify regulations, and make minor amendments.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of “Amendment No. 5 to the Construction Services Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Seattle Relating to the….CB 118923 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of “Amendment No. 5 to the Construction Services Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Seattle Relating to the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125275March 17, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit); authorizing execution of “Amendment No. 5 to the Construction Services Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Seattle Relating to the University Link, North Link, and East Link Projects”; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,011,394. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 75 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 118928 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 75 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125277March 17, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 75 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 743 N 35th Street from Neighborhood Commercial 3 Pedstrian-40 (NC3P-40) to Neighborhood Commercial 3 Pedestrian-65 (NC3P-65), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Bradley Khouri, B9 Architects, C.F. 314115, SDCI Project 3016369)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 99 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 118934 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 99 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125279March 27, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 99 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 203 West Republican Street from Neighborhood Commercial 3 with a 65-foot height limit to Neighborhood Commercial 3 with an 85-foot height limit, and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Mariner on Republican, LLC, C.F. 314331, SDCI Project 3020961)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118753 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125287April 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 25.05.675 and 25.05.800 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify and update references to the Comprehensive Plan and restore the categorical exemptions for State Environmental Policy Act review of proposed “infill” development.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $90,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates and consolidating provisions relating to Seattle recycling requirements.CB 118935 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid Waste Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates and consolidating provisions relating to Seattle recycling requirements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125288April 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; updating and consolidating provisions relating to Seattle recycling requirements; and amending Sections 21.36.082 and 21.36.083 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to execute an amendment to the Yesler Terrace Cooperative Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Seattle….CB 118937 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to execute an amendment to the Yesler Terrace Cooperative Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125290April 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the redevelopment of Yesler Terrace by the Housing Authority of the City of Seattle; authorizing the Mayor to execute an amendment to the Yesler Terrace Cooperative Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Seattle that was authorized by Ordinance 123961; authorizing the Director of Housing to implement the Cooperative Agreement as amended; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,620,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, changing appropriations for the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs to provide $1,000,000 from….CB 118946 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, changing appropriations for the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs to provide $1,000,000 from….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125296April 28, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, changing appropriations for the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs to provide $1,000,000 from the General Subfund in 2017 with an automatic carry-forward to 2018, solely to provide legal representation, or to provide guidance and referral services for legal representation, to indigent Seattle residents and workers in immigration proceedings; and establishing standards for the provision of legal representation and guidance and referral services for legal representation; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between The City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle….CB 118957 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between The City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125306May 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds; authorizing the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between The City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle Ordinance 114978; authorizing the deposit of 2015 and 2016 allocations from King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds into The City of Seattle’s 2008 Parks Levy Fund; and superseding Ordinance 124866.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,135,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 118951 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125303May 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Education and Early Learning, Department of Parks and Recreation, Human Services Department, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Police Department, and Seattle City Light, to accept specified grants and private funding and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,512,594. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the legacy of The City of Seattle’s relationship with the City of Mazatlán, Mexico, and declaring the designation of emeritus status….Res 31744 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Recognizing the legacy of The City of Seattle’s relationship with the City of Mazatlán, Mexico, and declaring the designation of emeritus status….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Sister Cities Program; recognizing the legacy of The City of Seattle’s relationship with the City of Mazatlán, Mexico, and declaring the designation of emeritus status to the sister city affiliation between The City of Seattle and the City of Mazatlán, Mexico; recognizing the importance to The City of Seattle of maintaining a sister city relationship with a city in Mexico; and lifting the moratorium on accepting applications for establishing new sister city affiliations for the limited purpose of accepting an application for the establishment of a new sister city affiliation with a city in Mexico.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a five-year lease agreement with the United States for the City of….CB 118964 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a five-year lease agreement with the United States for the City of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125309May 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a five-year lease agreement with the United States for the City of Seattle to use and occupy space at the Fort Lawton Army Reserve Center located adjacent to Discovery Park in the Magnolia neighborhood in Seattle, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renumbering Subchapter VI as Subchapter V and creating a new Subchapter VI in Chapter 3.28 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118761 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renumbering Subchapter VI as Subchapter V and creating a new Subchapter VI in Chapter 3.28 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125313June 1, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a public safety bill of rights for the Seattle public; renumbering Subchapter VI as Subchapter V and creating a new Subchapter VI in Chapter 3.28 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.CB 118972 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125316June 1, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the First Quarter 2017 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; amending Sections 4.20.315 and 4.20.320 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118963 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningYouth & Education Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125319June 1, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote5 in favor · 2 opposed
ZoningYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.76.006 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify that a land use decision to waive or modify structure width or setbacks for a youth service center, and integrated SEPA decisions, are Type II decisions that may be appealed to the City Hearing Examiner.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 2 opposed
Updates residential rental properties.CB 118993 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originElections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates residential rental properties.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125334June 23, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential rental properties; amending Sections 7.24.060, 7.24.070 and 7.24.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code; requiring that landlords provide information to tenants about how to register to vote and how to update voter registration information.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget.CB 118999 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125328June 23, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess, Bruce Harrell
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the appropriations for the Seattle Department of Transportation; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget; and imposing a proviso.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.CB 119001 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125337June 30, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code; amending Section 22.450.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code and amending the Seattle Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124011.CB 118974 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124011.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125343July 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to housing and building maintenance, amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 22.202.080, 22.206.020, 22.206.040, 22.206.050, 22.206.080, 22.206.090, 22.206.110, 22.206.130, 22.206.140, 22.206.160, 22.206.170, 22.214.050, and 22.214.086; and amending Ordinance 124011.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City’s traffic code.CB 118997 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City’s traffic code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125344July 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s traffic code; amending Sections 11.30.120, 11.50.250, 11.55.340, 11.56.025, 11.60.130, 11.60.180, and 11.60.200 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding Sections 11.58.009 and 11.84.490 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 11.84.460 and 11.84.480 of the Seattle Municipal Code to conform the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and make technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City’s criminal code.CB 118998 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City’s criminal code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125345July 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; amending Sections 12A.06.010, 12A.06.180, 12A.06.195, 12A.10.040, 12A.14.010, 12A.14.195, and 12A.18.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code to conform the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and make technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Bender Development LP and Bender Equities Inc. permission to construct, maintain, and operate a plaza over and across East Howe Street….CB 119006 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Bender Development LP and Bender Equities Inc. permission to construct, maintain, and operate a plaza over and across East Howe Street….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125350July 21, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Bender Development LP and Bender Equities Inc. permission to construct, maintain, and operate a plaza over and across East Howe Street, south of Yale Place East and west of Eastlake Avenue East for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,122. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Bike Path 1, LLC permission to operate and maintain a portion of an existing one-story commercial building on a portion of….CB 119007 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originTraffic SafetyPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Bike Path 1, LLC permission to operate and maintain a portion of an existing one-story commercial building on a portion of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125351July 21, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic SafetyPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Bike Path 1, LLC permission to operate and maintain a portion of an existing one-story commercial building on a portion of Northeast 45th Street, west of 38th Avenue Northeast, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,583. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 113 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 119028 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 113 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125357July 24, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 113 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 2320 E Union Street from Neighborhood Commercial 2 with a Pedestrian Overlay and 40-foot height limit (NC2P-40) and Neighborhood Commercial 2 with a 40-foot height limit (NC2-40) to Neighborhood Commercial 2 with a Pedestrian Overlay and a 65-foot height limit (NC2P-65), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Capitol Hill Housing, C.F. 314349, SDCI Project 3018178)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118980 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentOrigin unclearZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125362August 2, 2017
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.41.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code to update the list of approved neighborhood design guidelines; approving and adopting the new Mount Baker Town Center Design Guidelines; and approving and adopting augmented Pike/Pine Design Guidelines.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 112 and 113 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land….CB 118981 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 112 and 113 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125359August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 112 and 113 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the 23rd and Cherry node of the 23rd & Union-Jackson Residential Urban Village; and amending Sections 23.45.510, 23.45.512, 23.45.514, and 23.45.517 of the Seattle Municipal Code to implement Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $260,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Office for Civil Rights.CB 118984 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Office for Civil Rights.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125370August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Office for Civil Rights; amending Section 3.14.920 of the Seattle Municipal Code to increase the membership of the Seattle Human Rights Commission, the Seattle Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer (LGBTQ) Commission, and the Seattle Commission for People with Disabilities and change the appointment authority for these and the Seattle Women’s Commission.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $2.8 million from the Municipal Arts Fund to the 2018 Multipurpose LTGO Bond….CB 119035 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & StructuresTenant ProtectionsPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds in the amount of $2.8 million from the Municipal Arts Fund to the 2018 Multipurpose LTGO Bond….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125373August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresTenant ProtectionsPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of King Street Station third-floor tenant improvements; authorizing the loan of funds in the amount of $2.8 million from the Municipal Arts Fund to the 2018 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund for bridge financing for design and construction of improvements.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32 of the SMC) to make typographical corrections related to Exhibit A to Ordinance 125291….CB 119004 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32 of the SMC) to make typographical corrections related to Exhibit A to Ordinance 125291….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125363August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, amending Map A for Section 23.58B.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32 of the SMC) to make typographical corrections related to Exhibit A to Ordinance 125291 that rezoned certain land in Downtown, South Lake Union, and adjacent IC zones.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 119038 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125374August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw, Rob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.49.008, 23.49.011, 23.76.004, and 23.76.006 of the Seattle Municipal Code to encourage voluntary setbacks in the Downtown Office Core 2 zone between existing residential towers and new towers by authorizing additional height and density.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118985 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125387August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Rob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.76.004, 23.76.022, and 23.88.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code to provide that interpretations by the Director of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections are not administrative remedies that must be exhausted prior to seeking judicial review.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $3,150. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a 2017 Citywide Position List.CB 119020 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2017 Citywide Position List.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125381August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adopting a 2017 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 119023 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125382August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2017, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Education and Early Learning, Department of Parks and Recreation, Human Services Department, Law Department, Information Technology Department, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Police Department, and Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants and private funding and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,421,802. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a Project Partnership Agreement with the Seattle District United States Army Corps….CB 119043 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a Project Partnership Agreement with the Seattle District United States Army Corps….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125386August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a Project Partnership Agreement with the Seattle District United States Army Corps of Engineers for purposes of executing the Alki Coastal Erosion Control Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,900,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Fire Chiefs Association, IAFF, Local 2898 to….CB 119044 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originFire & EMSCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Fire Chiefs Association, IAFF, Local 2898 to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125378August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Fire Chiefs Association, IAFF, Local 2898 to be effective January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2018; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, by increasing appropriations to the Seattle Fire Department for providing the 2015, 2016, and 2017 payments therefor; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $736,977. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 117 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 119059 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 117 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125394September 5, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 117 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 1203 East Spruce Street from Lowrise 3 to Neighborhood Commercial 3 with a 65-foot height limit, and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Capitol Hill Development, LLC, C.F. 314310, SDCI Project 3018576)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118971 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125399September 8, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 22.206.200, 22.208.020, 23.40.006, and 23.91.002 of the Seattle Municipal Code; to modify maintenance and demolition standards related to vacant buildings.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a series of four five-year leases (each conferring….CB 119065 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a series of four five-year leases (each conferring….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125402September 12, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a series of four five-year leases (each conferring upon the tenant a five-year option to renew) with existing Seattle Municipal Tower restaurant/retail tenants: Sin Taek Chang and Jin Won Chang d/b/a Amigos! & Beba’s; Hunjo Jung and Na Young Lee d/b/a Chew Chew’s Eatery; RVJ Corporation, Inc., a Washington corporation, d/b/a Core Bistro; and Daniel Y. Kim and Michelle H. Kim, d/b/a Treasures and Gifts; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $112,500. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Reaffirming the overall funding plan for the Central Waterfront Improvements and the principles that will guide implementation of these improvements.Res 31768 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Reaffirming the overall funding plan for the Central Waterfront Improvements and the principles that will guide implementation of these improvements.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 12, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to funding for construction and long-term operations and management of public spaces on the Central Waterfront; reaffirming the overall funding plan for the Central Waterfront Improvements and the principles that will guide implementation of these improvements; outlining the process for formation of a Local Improvement District and completion of a fundraising plan for philanthropy; and identifying a framework for an agreement with the non-profit Friends of Waterfront Seattle to operate and manage public spaces on the Central Waterfront.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding three new members.CB 119066 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding three new members.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125415September 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Urban Forestry Commission; adding three new members; and amending Sections 3.72.020 and 3.72.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Electrical Code.CB 119069 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Electrical Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125408September 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Electrical Code; amending Section 22.300.016 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adopting the 2017 National Electrical Code with Seattle amendments; adopting by incorporation specific portions of the 2017 Washington Administrative Code Chapter 296-46B (Washington State Electrical Rule); and repealing Sections 2 through 34 of Ordinance 124593.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $16,793. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending procedures for the Evaluation of the Reuse and Disposal of the City’s Real Property, to update certain portions of the procedures….Res 31770 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending procedures for the Evaluation of the Reuse and Disposal of the City’s Real Property, to update certain portions of the procedures….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 29, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending procedures for the Evaluation of the Reuse and Disposal of the City’s Real Property, to update certain portions of the procedures and expedite the disposition of properties for affordable housing development, consistent with the recommendations of the Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda (HALA) Advisory Committee adopted by the City Council in Resolution 31622.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the Design Review program.CB 119057 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentHistoric Preservation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies the Design Review program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125429October 5, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentHistoric Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; modifying the Design Review program; repealing and replacing Section 23.41.004 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); amending Sections 3.51.030, 23.41.002, 23.41.008, 23.41.010, 23.41.012, 23.41.014, 23.41.016, 23.41.020, 23.57.013, 23.66.020, 23.66.030, 23.66.035, 23.73.009, 23.73.010, 23.73.012, 23.73.014, 23.73.015, 23.73.024, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.76.008, 23.76.011, 23.76.012, 23.76.026, 23.76.040, 25.11.070, 25.11.080, 25.12.320, 25.12.680, 25.12.690 and 25.12.730 of the SMC; adding new Sections 23.41.015 and 23.41.022 to the SMC; repealing Section 23.41.018 of the SMC; making technical corrections; and adding new Sections 23.66.050 and 25.12.735 to modify the duties of Special Review District Boards and Landmark Preservation Boards by authorizing these Board to make recommendations to SDCI on design review development standard departures.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $314,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a license agreement with King County for its use of the radio-transmitter….CB 119079 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a license agreement with King County for its use of the radio-transmitter….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125431October 5, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City of Seattle’s Maple Leaf radio-transmitter facility; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a license agreement with King County for its use of the radio-transmitter site at Maple Leaf reservoir for the new regional Puget Sound emergency radio network; and declaring a portion of property licensed for King County’s use in the same location to be surplus to the City’s utility needs.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,910,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to approve the transfer of control, subject to conditions, of WaveDivision I, LLC.CB 119090 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to approve the transfer of control, subject to conditions, of WaveDivision I, LLC.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125430October 5, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to cable television; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to approve the transfer of control, subject to conditions, of WaveDivision I, LLC; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to execute a Cable Franchise Transfer of Controlling Interest Consent Agreement for the purpose of implementing and administering the transfer; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, or processing of applications for the establishment, expansion, or change of use for certain uses….CB 119093 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, or processing of applications for the establishment, expansion, or change of use for certain uses….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125425October 5, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adopting a moratorium on the filing, acceptance, or processing of applications for the establishment, expansion, or change of use for certain uses on parcels with a Commercial 1, Commercial 2, or Neighborhood Commercial 3 zoning designation within the Aurora-Licton Urban Village; declaring an emergency and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 113 and 114 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property….CB 119091 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 113 and 114 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125433October 9, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 113 and 114 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 1106 34th Avenue from Lowrise 2 to Neighborhood Commercial 1 with a 30-foot height limit and a Mandatory Housing Affordability suffix of (M), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Martin Liebowitz, C.F. 314325, SDCI Project 3020405)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 99, 98, and 100 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone….CB 119055 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 99, 98, and 100 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125432October 11, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at pages 99, 98, and 100 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone land in the Uptown area; amending Sections 23.30.010, 23.45.517, 23.48.002, 23.48.005, 23.48.020, 23.48.021, 23.48.040, 23.48.055, 23.48.085, 23.48.620, 23.58A.042, 23.58C.050, 23.84A.025, 23.84A.042, and 25.05.800 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Subchapter VI to Chapter 23.48 of the Seattle Municipal Code, consisting of Sections 23.48.702, 23.48.705, 23.48.720, 23.48.721, 23.48.722, 23.48.723, 23.48.724, 23.48.730, 23.48.732, 23.48.735, 23.48.740, 23.48.745, 23.48.750, 23.48.755, 23.48.780, and 23.48.785, to rezone areas in the Uptown Urban Center.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $3,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Management Association to be effective….CB 119126 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Management Association to be effective….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125441November 17, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceCollective BargainingBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Police Management Association to be effective January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2019; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 Budget, by increasing appropriations to the Seattle Police Department for providing the 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 payments therefor; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $198,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Adjusts business and professional license and registration fees associated with the regulated activities of alarm monitoring, trade shows, residential sales, tow companies….CB 119111 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts business and professional license and registration fees associated with the regulated activities of alarm monitoring, trade shows, residential sales, tow companies….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125449November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to regulatory business and professional license fees; adjusting business and professional license and registration fees associated with the regulated activities of alarm monitoring, trade shows, residential sales, tow companies, used and recycled goods, adult entertainment, and price scanning; and amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 6.08.010, 6.10.010, 6.20.040, 6.204.030, 6.204.080, 6.214.270, 6.250.060, 6.270.060, and 7.04.645.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $503,036. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to The City of Seattle’s Emergency Relocation Assistance Program, as administered by the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections.CB 119107 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to The City of Seattle’s Emergency Relocation Assistance Program, as administered by the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125468November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to The City of Seattle’s Emergency Relocation Assistance Program, as administered by the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections; and amending Section 22.202.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts and simplifying adoption fees and animal control fees.CB 119112 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts and simplifying adoption fees and animal control fees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125450November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to pet adoption fees and other animal control fees; adjusting and simplifying adoption fees and animal control fees; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to adjust adoption fees and animal control fees; and amending Sections 9.26.050 and 9.26.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $62,442. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates organization of the Office for Civil Rights.CB 119120 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates organization of the Office for Civil Rights.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125470November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to organization of the Office for Civil Rights; amending Section 3.14.910 of the Seattle Municipal Code to change removal from at-will to for-cause for subsequent Directors of the Office for Civil Rights.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Conditioning the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2018 grant applications.CB 119124 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conditioning the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2018 grant applications.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125471November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE conditioning the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2018 grant applications.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Section 3.20.050 to the Seattle Municipal Code to provide that the Seattle Human Services Department utilize a results-based framework….CB 119125 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food Security Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Section 3.20.050 to the Seattle Municipal Code to provide that the Seattle Human Services Department utilize a results-based framework….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125474November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Human Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to contracting by the Human Services Department; adding a new Section 3.20.050 to the Seattle Municipal Code to provide that the Seattle Human Services Department utilize a results-based framework for designing human service investments; amending Section 3.20.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify the duties of the Director of the Human Services Department with respect to contracting for human services to carry out department programs; and adding a new Section 20.50.020 to the Seattle Municipal Code to exempt contracts for human services executed by the Director from provisions of Chapter 20.50.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes an interfund loan in the amount of $4,692,000 from the Seattle Information Technology Operating Fund to the General Subfund Fund.CB 119129 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an interfund loan in the amount of $4,692,000 from the Seattle Information Technology Operating Fund to the General Subfund Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125464November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of tax administration system improvements and regulatory licensing systems in the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing an interfund loan in the amount of $4,692,000 from the Seattle Information Technology Operating Fund to the General Subfund Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,692,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Section 3.28.140 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 119136 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Section 3.28.140 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125472November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to decreasing militarization of police activities; adding a new Section 3.28.140 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 150 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 119147 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 150 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125481December 4, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 150 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 5911 42nd Avenue Southwest from Single Family 5000 to Lowrise 1, and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by David Neiman, C.F. 314343, SDCI Project 3016200)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates short-term rental uses and bed and breakfast uses.CB 119082 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates short-term rental uses and bed and breakfast uses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125483December 8, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to short-term rental uses and bed and breakfast uses; amending Sections 22.214.030, 23.44.051, 23.45.545, 23.84A.024, 23.84A.030, and 23.84A.036 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and adding a new Section 23.42.060 to the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending provisions related to adjustments to the wastewater volume charge due to water leaks.CB 119142 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending provisions related to adjustments to the wastewater volume charge due to water leaks.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125485December 8, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; amending provisions related to adjustments to the wastewater volume charge due to water leaks; and amending Section 21.28.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $35,197. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Updates City employment.CB 119144 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates City employment.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125484December 8, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; amending Sections 4.24.005, 4.24.010, 4.24.030, 4.24.035, and 4.24.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); and repealing Section 4.24.050 of the SMC; authorizing a memorandum of understanding between The City of Seattle and City labor unions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a Concession Agreement with EarthCorps to occupy and use a portion of….CB 119049 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a Concession Agreement with EarthCorps to occupy and use a portion of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125498December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a Concession Agreement with EarthCorps to occupy and use a portion of Building 30 at Warren G. Magnuson Park for general office purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,387,230. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2018-2019 and a ten-year conservation potential.Res 31765 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricity Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2018-2019 and a ten-year conservation potential.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2018-2019 and a ten-year conservation potential.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Pertaining to the fund structure of the City Treasury.CB 119152 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originGovernment Accountability Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Pertaining to the fund structure of the City Treasury.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125492December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Government Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE pertaining to the fund structure of the City Treasury; reorganizing certain funds and subfunds consistent with the recommendations of the City’s Financial Management and Accountability Program; creating new funds; transferring assets, liabilities, and fund balances between certain funds; making technical corrections; repealing Chapters 5.76 and 21.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code; amending Sections 3.02.120, 3.06.010, 3.06.055, 3.12.120, 3.15.007, 3.35.030, 3.35.050, 3.39.035, 4.40.020, 4.44.060, 4.50.020, 4.100.020, 5.06.030, 5.24.010, 5.24.020, 5.40.120, 5.64.030, 5.64.100, 5.78.200, 5.78.210, Chapter 5.80, Sections 11.16.312, 11.61.090, 12A.10.110, 15.04.074, 15.62.110, 15.91.016, 16.08.050, 20.32.050, 22.202.050, 22.202.060, 22.214.087, 22.220.090, 22.220.100, 22.900G.080, 22.930.120, 23.58D.006, and 23.90.018 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Ordinances 104195, 112556, 114893, 115859, 116642, 117342, 117472, 117977, 118289, 118617, 119273, 119758, 120214, 120489, 120912, 120944, 121206, 121661, 121742, 122088, 122424, 122603, 122876, 123177, 123184, 123761, 124652, 124833, and 124906.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget.CB 119153 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125493December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
fiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 Budget; modifying appropriations to various budget control levels and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designees to execute an Agreement with the State of Washington to set forth roles and responsibilities….CB 119155 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & StructuresProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designees to execute an Agreement with the State of Washington to set forth roles and responsibilities….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125501December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the State Route 99 Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designees to execute an Agreement with the State of Washington to set forth roles and responsibilities for the State’s project to demolish the existing Alaskan Way Viaduct structure once the bored tunnel is opened to drivers.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates employment in Seattle.CB 119145 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates employment in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125499December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to employment in Seattle; amending Sections 14.16.010, 14.16.015, 14.16.020, 14.16.025, 14.16.030, 14.16.040, 14.16.045, 14.16.050, 14.16.055, 14.16.120, 14.22.010, and 14.22.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to strengthen and clarify labor standards requirements for paid sick and paid safe time and secure scheduling; and amending the name of Chapter 14.22 of the SMC to make a technical correction.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Repealing Ordinance 124552 and amending Sections 23.42.058, 23.47A.002, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.020, 23.48.002, 23.48.005, 23.48.065, 23.49.002, 23.49.025, 23.49.042, 23.49.090, 23.49.142, 23.49.300, 23.49.320, 23.49.338, 23.50.002….CB 118580 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Repealing Ordinance 124552 and amending Sections 23.42.058, 23.47A.002, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.020, 23.48.002, 23.48.005, 23.48.065, 23.49.002, 23.49.025, 23.49.042, 23.49.090, 23.49.142, 23.49.300, 23.49.320, 23.49.338, 23.50.002….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124969January 12, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; repealing Ordinance 124552 and amending Sections 23.42.058, 23.47A.002, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.020, 23.48.002, 23.48.005, 23.48.065, 23.49.002, 23.49.025, 23.49.042, 23.49.090, 23.49.142, 23.49.300, 23.49.320, 23.49.338, 23.50.002, 23.50.012, 23.50.014, 23.50.044, 23.66.122, 23.66.322, and 23.84A.025 of the Seattle Municipal Code to change marijuana zoning regulations and make technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Section 21.49.088 to the Seattle Municipal Code to create a utility tax pass through.CB 118563 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Section 21.49.088 to the Seattle Municipal Code to create a utility tax pass through.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124978January 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the rates, terms, and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department; adding a new Section 21.49.088 to the Seattle Municipal Code to create a utility tax pass through; and amending Sections 21.49.020, 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.081, and 21.49.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code to implement new distinct rates for the city of Lake Forest Park to allow for the potential addition of a utility tax.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2016-2017 and a ten-year conservation potential.Res 31631 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricity Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2016-2017 and a ten-year conservation potential.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving City Light’s adoption of a biennial energy conservation target for 2016-2017 and a ten-year conservation potential.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets the public hearing on the petition of WSA Properties et al. to vacate Occidental Avenue South between the north margin of….RES 31650 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sets the public hearing on the petition of WSA Properties et al. to vacate Occidental Avenue South between the north margin of….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting the public hearing on the petition of WSA Properties et al. to vacate Occidental Avenue South between the north margin of South Holgate Street and a line parallel to and 30 feet south of the centerline of South Massachusetts Street in the South Downtown neighborhood of Seattle; according to Chapter 35.79 Revised Code of Washington, Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 15.62, and Clerk File 312905.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Amending the 2016-2021 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.CB 118623 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the 2016-2021 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124994February 18, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending the 2016-2021 Adopted Capital Improvement Program; authorizing acceptance of pass-through grant funds from King County; granting budget authority for expenditure of said grant funds; and authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to use such pass-through grant funds and to enter into agreements for the acquisition of certain properties and the design of habitat restoration projects along the Cedar River.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Lifting a budget proviso imposed on Finance General's Reserves Budget Control Level.CB 118619 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Lifting a budget proviso imposed on Finance General's Reserves Budget Control Level.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124993February 18, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to homelessness; lifting a budget proviso imposed on Finance General's Reserves Budget Control Level; and making cash transfers between various City funds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,312,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requiring a schedule for periodic building tune-ups for City-owned facilities and directing the Office of Sustainability & Environment to develop guidelines for….Res 31652 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requiring a schedule for periodic building tune-ups for City-owned facilities and directing the Office of Sustainability & Environment to develop guidelines for….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requiring a schedule for periodic building tune-ups for City-owned facilities and directing the Office of Sustainability & Environment to develop guidelines for energy efficient asset preservation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.CB 118634 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125006March 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, including the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation; revising allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2016-2021 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a partial removal of the proviso included in 2016 budget Green Sheet 93-1-A-1.CB 118618 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTraffic SafetyBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a partial removal of the proviso included in 2016 budget Green Sheet 93-1-A-1.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125011March 25, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Traffic SafetyBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle bike share program; authorizing a partial removal of the proviso included in 2016 budget Green Sheet 93-1-A-1; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Accepts a ten-year franchise authorizing limited use of the public road rights-of-way in Snohomish County, Washington by Seattle City Light to construct….CB 118648 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts a ten-year franchise authorizing limited use of the public road rights-of-way in Snohomish County, Washington by Seattle City Light to construct….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125018April 1, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting a ten-year franchise authorizing limited use of the public road rights-of-way in Snohomish County, Washington by Seattle City Light to construct, maintain, operate, replace, and repair electric power system facilities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the terms and conditions for members of the Labor Standards Advisory Commission.CB 118649 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the terms and conditions for members of the Labor Standards Advisory Commission.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125017April 1, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing the terms and conditions for members of the Labor Standards Advisory Commission; amending Section 3.14.934 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 91 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 118654 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 91 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125024April 11, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 91 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 2203 and 2209 Eastlake Avenue E from Neighborhood Commercial 1 Pedestrian-30 (NC1P-30) and Lowrise 2 Residential Commercial (LR2 RC) to Neighborhood Commercial 2 Pedestrian-40 (NC2P-40), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Maria Barrientos, C.F. 314127, DPD Project 3016024)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Qwest Corporation, d.b.a. CenturyLink QC, permission to maintain and operate an at-grade fiber hut on the north side of Northwest 105th….CB 118643 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Qwest Corporation, d.b.a. CenturyLink QC, permission to maintain and operate an at-grade fiber hut on the north side of Northwest 105th….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125023April 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Qwest Corporation, d.b.a. CenturyLink QC, permission to maintain and operate an at-grade fiber hut on the north side of Northwest 105th Street, east of 8th Avenue Northwest, and north of Alderbrook Place Northwest, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates violations of the All-Gender Restroom Ordinance.CB 118652 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates violations of the All-Gender Restroom Ordinance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125027April 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to violations of the All-Gender Restroom Ordinance; amending Section 14.07.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify a respondent’s right to appeal the violation outlined in subsection 14.07.040.C.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Youth Commission.CB 118661 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & Education Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Youth Commission.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125029April 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Youth Commission; amending Sections 3.67.020, 3.67.030, 3.67.050, and 3.67.060 and repealing Section 3.67.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the operation of open-air tour vehicles.CB 118663 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the operation of open-air tour vehicles.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125031May 4, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the operation of open-air tour vehicles; creating a new Chapter 15.66 in the Seattle Municipal Code; and amending Sections 15.91.002 and 15.91.016 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 16 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 118676 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 16 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125035May 9, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 16 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 10711 8th Avenue NE from Neighborhood Commercial 3-40 (NC3-40) to Neighborhood Commercial 3-65 (NC3-65), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Kevin Cleary, Baylis Architects, C.F. 314287, DPD Project 3018442)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a new Major Institution Master Plan for the Swedish Medical Center at Cherry Hill.CB 118655 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a new Major Institution Master Plan for the Swedish Medical Center at Cherry Hill.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125037May 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; adopting a new Major Institution Master Plan for the Swedish Medical Center at Cherry Hill; and amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at Page 112 of the Official Land Use Map, to modify height limits and rezone property within the Major Institution Overlay (Project Number 3012593, Clerk File 311936).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget.CB 118668 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125040May 27, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget; changing appropriations to various departments and from various funds in the Budget; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program; creating new appropriations; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $680,456. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 118670 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPoliceParks & RecreationElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125042May 27, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceParks & RecreationElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Neighborhoods, Department of Parks and Recreation, Human Services Department, Seattle City Light, Seattle Department of Transportation, Seattle Police Department, Seattle Information Technology Department, and Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants and private funding and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,351,337. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates voyeurism in a public place.CB 118704 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates voyeurism in a public place.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125052June 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to voyeurism in a public place; amending Section 12A.10.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes regulations and enforcement provisions related to residential rent increases on properties that do not meet basic maintenance standards.CB 118678 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTenant ProtectionsPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes regulations and enforcement provisions related to residential rent increases on properties that do not meet basic maintenance standards.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125054June 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant ProtectionsPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to tenant protections; establishing regulations and enforcement provisions related to residential rent increases on properties that do not meet basic maintenance standards; transferring primary enforcement authority for all sections of Title 22, Subtitle 2 of the Seattle Municipal Code (Housing Code) to the Director of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections; amending the penalty structure for certain violations of the Housing Code; amending Sections 22.202.010, 22.202.050, 22.204.090, 22.206.180, 22.206.220, 22.206.280, and 22.206.305 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 22.202.080.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118672 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125053June 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.40.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code to extend the enrollment period for the Living Building Pilot Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Hearing Examiner filing fees.CB 118694 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Hearing Examiner filing fees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125056June 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Hearing Examiner filing fees; amending Section 3.02.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code to add exceptions for cases brought to enforce Chapter 14.07 (All Gender Single Occupant Restroom Requirements), Chapter 6.500 (Marijuana Business Regulations), Chapter 14.19 (Minimum Wage Ordinance), and Chapter 14.20 (Wage Theft Ordinance).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $85. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a five-year concession agreement with Gary Warhaftig, d/b/a Point of View Telescopes, to….CB 118699 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a five-year concession agreement with Gary Warhaftig, d/b/a Point of View Telescopes, to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125066June 24, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a five-year concession agreement with Gary Warhaftig, d/b/a Point of View Telescopes, to manage, maintain, and provide coin-operated telescopes at various City-owned park facilities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $11,500. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes new titles and/or salaries.CB 118697 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes new titles and/or salaries.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125065June 24, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment commonly referred to as the First Quarter 2016 Employment Ordinance; establishing new titles and/or salaries; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; amending Sections 4.13.010, 4.20.160, 4.20.401, 4.20.440, 4.20.450, and 4.34.035 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to transportation funding.CB 118667 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to transportation funding.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125070July 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to transportation funding; assuming the rights, powers, immunities, functions, and obligations of the Seattle Transportation Benefit District by The City of Seattle; amending Section 3.120.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 3.120.030, 3.120.040, 3.120.050, and 3.120.060.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $600,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Music Commission.CB 118727 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Music Commission.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125080July 22, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Music Commission; amending Sections 3.74.010, 3.74.020, 3.74.030, and 3.74.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify terms of members and make technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Official Land Use Map at pages 3 and 13 to rezone land in the Bitter Lake Village Hub Urban Village.CB 118674 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Official Land Use Map at pages 3 and 13 to rezone land in the Bitter Lake Village Hub Urban Village.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125081July 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Official Land Use Map at pages 3 and 13 to rezone land in the Bitter Lake Village Hub Urban Village; and amending Sections 23.47A.005, 23.47A.009, 23.47A.014 and 23.86.012 of the Seattle Municipal Code to change regulations for street-level uses, designate Linden Avenue North as a principal pedestrian street, and adopt development standards for certain properties in the Bitter Lake Village Hub Urban Village.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the for-hire industry, including wheelchair accessible taxis and for-hire industry insurance.CB 118712 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originAccessibility Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the for-hire industry, including wheelchair accessible taxis and for-hire industry insurance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125082July 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accessibility
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the for-hire industry, including wheelchair accessible taxis and for-hire industry insurance; amending Sections 6.310.260, 6.310.300, and 6.310.500 and repealing Section 6.310.335 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants SP Greenwood LLC permission to construct and maintain a public art installation on a portion of 1st Avenue Northwest, southwest of….CB 118734 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentOrigin unclearPermitting & DevelopmentArts & Culture Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Grants SP Greenwood LLC permission to construct and maintain a public art installation on a portion of 1st Avenue Northwest, southwest of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125090July 29, 2016
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting SP Greenwood LLC permission to construct and maintain a public art installation on a portion of 1st Avenue Northwest, southwest of the intersection with Northwest 85th Street, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a Partnership Agreement for the Activation and Programming of Westlake Park and Occidental Square.CB 118735 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a Partnership Agreement for the Activation and Programming of Westlake Park and Occidental Square.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125091July 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the execution of a Partnership Agreement for the Activation and Programming of Westlake Park and Occidental Square; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $900,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the Municipal Arts Fund.CB 118719 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & Culture Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the Municipal Arts Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125094August 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the Municipal Arts Fund; amending Section 20.32.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow for expenditures related to public art maintenance; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 90 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 118750 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 90 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125102August 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 90 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 1511 Dexter Avenue North from Neighborhood Commercial 3-40 (NC3-40) to Neighborhood Commercial 3-65 (NC3-65), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Bellwether Housing, C.F. 314315, SDCI Project 3015682)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32) to rezone land within the Lake City Urban Village and along Lake City Way.CB 118675 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32) to rezone land within the Lake City Urban Village and along Lake City Way.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125103August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32) to rezone land within the Lake City Urban Village and along Lake City Way; amending subsection 23.47A.005.C of the Seattle Municipal Code to remove certain restrictions on street-level street-facing residential uses; and amending Section 23.47A.009 to adopt development standards for certain properties along Lake City Way.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute for and on behalf of the City an amendment to the existing Seacrest….CB 118725 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute for and on behalf of the City an amendment to the existing Seacrest….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125104August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute for and on behalf of the City an amendment to the existing Seacrest Boathouse Concession Agreement with Marination LLC, originally authorized by Ordinance 124112; authorizing the Superintendent to execute future amendments relating to concession fees as the Superintendent determines to be in the best interest of the City; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a separate retirement plan for City employees whose membership in the Retirement System begins on or after January 1, 2017.CB 118737 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a separate retirement plan for City employees whose membership in the Retirement System begins on or after January 1, 2017.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125109August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System; creating a separate retirement plan for City employees whose membership in the Retirement System begins on or after January 1, 2017; clarifying certain provisions and making technical corrections; and adding new Sections 4.36.005, 4.36.607, and 4.36.608 to, and amending Sections 4.36.010, 4.36.020, 4.36.030, 4.36.040, 4.36.050, 4.36.060, 4.36.070, 4.36.080, 4.36.090, 4.36.500, 4.36.505, 4.36.510, 4.36.515, 4.36.520, 4.36.525, 4.36.530, 4.36.540, 4.36.545, 4.36.550, 4.36.555, 4.36.560, 4.36.565, 4.36.567, 4.36.570, 4.36.575, 4.36.580, 4.36.585, 4.36.590, 4.36.595, 4.36.600, 4.36.605, 4.36.610, 4.36.615, 4.36.620, 4.36.625, 4.36.630, 4.36.635, 4.36.640, 4.36.645, 4.36.650, 4.36.655, 4.36.660, 4.36.665, 4.36.670, 4.36.675, 4.36.680, 4.36.690, 4.36.695, 4.36.705, 4.36.710, 4.36.715, 4.36.720, and 4.36.900 of, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding antidiscrimination protections based on a renters’ use of a subsidy or verifiable alternative source of income.CB 118755 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding antidiscrimination protections based on a renters’ use of a subsidy or verifiable alternative source of income.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125114August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Open Housing Ordinance; adding antidiscrimination protections based on a renters’ use of a subsidy or verifiable alternative source of income; adding a first-in-time policy; prohibiting preferred employer programs; adding Section 14.08.050 to, and amending Sections 14.08.015, 14.08.020, 14.08.040, 14.08.045, 14.08.060, 14.08.070 and 14.08.190 of, the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates international affairs and the Seattle Sister Cities program, amending Sections 3.14.440, 3.14.450, 3.14.460, and 3.14.470 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118754 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates international affairs and the Seattle Sister Cities program, amending Sections 3.14.440, 3.14.450, 3.14.460, and 3.14.470 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125113August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to international affairs and the Seattle Sister Cities program, amending Sections 3.14.440, 3.14.450, 3.14.460, and 3.14.470 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA) project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board….Res 31691 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA) project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 9, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA) project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board as provided in RCW 79.105.150, chapter 79A.25 RCW, Title 286 WAC, and other applicable authorities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $950,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to submit application(s) for grant funding assistance for Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) project(s)….Res 31692 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to submit application(s) for grant funding assistance for Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) project(s)….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 9, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to submit application(s) for grant funding assistance for Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board as provided in chapter 79A.25 RCW, Title 286 WAC, and other applicable authorities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 118751 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125118September 9, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2016, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Parks and Recreation, Human Services Department, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Police Department, Legislative Department, and Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants and private funding and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,884,684. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes implementation of certain Neighborhood Matching Fund projects in 2016, and specifying that 2016 appropriations for the Neighborhood Matching Subfund shall carry….CB 118759 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originNeighborhoodsBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes implementation of certain Neighborhood Matching Fund projects in 2016, and specifying that 2016 appropriations for the Neighborhood Matching Subfund shall carry….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125120September 9, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Neighborhoods; authorizing implementation of certain Neighborhood Matching Fund projects in 2016, and specifying that 2016 appropriations for the Neighborhood Matching Subfund shall carry forward automatically to future budget years.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,244,512. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes The City of Seattle to purchase housing TDR from a lot at 1902 2nd Avenue in Seattle.CB 118762 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes The City of Seattle to purchase housing TDR from a lot at 1902 2nd Avenue in Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125121September 9, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to transferable development rights (TDR); authorizing The City of Seattle to purchase housing TDR from a lot at 1902 2nd Avenue in Seattle; and authorizing related agreements and acceptance of a deed.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,653,919. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118693 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125125September 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.47A.005 and 23.47A.009 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adopt development standards for certain properties in the Ballard Hub Urban Village; and amending the Official Land Use Map at pages 53, 54, and 55 to rezone land in the Ballard Hub Urban Village.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates City employment, adopting a 2016 Citywide Position List.CB 118786 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates City employment, adopting a 2016 Citywide Position List.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125128September 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, adopting a 2016 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for Youth Athletic Facilities (YAF) project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board as….Res 31693 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatYouth & Education Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for Youth Athletic Facilities (YAF) project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board as….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 19, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing submission of application(s) for grant funding assistance for Youth Athletic Facilities (YAF) project(s) to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board as provided in chapter 79A.25 RCW, WAC 286, and other applicable authorities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,250,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 60 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 118784 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 60 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125133September 19, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 60 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 5001 Brooklyn Ave NE from Lowrise 3 (LR3) to Neighborhood Commercial 3-65 (NC3-65), and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by Brooklyn 50 LLC, C.F. 314324, SDCI Project 3019997)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the regulation of the for-hire industry, amending Sections 6.310.110 and 6.310.735 of the Seattle Municipal Code to add clarity to the….CB 118793 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the regulation of the for-hire industry, amending Sections 6.310.110 and 6.310.735 of the Seattle Municipal Code to add clarity to the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125132September 22, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the regulation of the for-hire industry, amending Sections 6.310.110 and 6.310.735 of the Seattle Municipal Code to add clarity to the qualifying driver description and extend the commencement date, and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 112 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….CB 118785 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 112 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125134September 26, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 112 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone property located at 2220 East Union Street from Neighborhood Commercial 2-40 (NC2-40) to Neighborhood Commercial 2-65 (NC2-65) and from Neighborhood Commercial 2-40 with a pedestrian designation (NC2P-40) to Neighborhood Commercial 2-65 with a pedestrian designation (NC2P-65); and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Petition by East Union 22, LLC, C.F. 314312, SDCI Project 3019001)

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 disqualified
Updates the Seattle Fire Code, adopting as the Seattle Fire Code the 2015 edition of the International Fire Code with some exceptions….CB 118772 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Fire Code, adopting as the Seattle Fire Code the 2015 edition of the International Fire Code with some exceptions….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125138September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Fire Code, adopting as the Seattle Fire Code the 2015 edition of the International Fire Code with some exceptions, amending and adding various provisions to that code; amending Section 22.600.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Sections 2 through 44 of Ordinance 124288.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates utility permits and regulations.CB 118813 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates utility permits and regulations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125149September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to utility permits and regulations; amending Sections 15.32.050 and 15.32.160 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates City employment.CB 118811 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates City employment.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125148September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; amending Section 4.04.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code; authorizing a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and certain City unions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Fuel Gas Code.CB 118776 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Fuel Gas Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125156October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Fuel Gas Code; amending Section 22.420.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adopting by reference Chapters 2 through 8 of the 2015 International Fuel Gas Code, and amending those chapters; adopting a new Chapter 1 for the Seattle Fuel Gas Code related to administration, permitting, and enforcement; and repealing Sections 2-8 of Ordinance 124276.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Plumbing Code.CB 118777 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Plumbing Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125157October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Plumbing Code; amending Section 22.502.016 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adopting by reference Chapter 51-56 of the Washington Administrative Code with amendments, except Sections 51-56-008 and 51-56-0100; adopting a new Chapter 1 related to administration, permitting, and enforcement; and repealing Ordinance 124615 and Sections 3-12 of Ordinance 124274.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Existing Building Code.CB 118778 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Existing Building Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125158October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Existing Building Code; amending Section 22.110.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adopting by reference Chapters 2 through 5, 7 through 11, 14 through 16, A1, A3, A4, and A6 of the 2015 International Existing Building Code; amending certain of those chapters, and adopting a new Chapter 1 related to administration, permitting, and enforcement; and repealing Sections 2-17 of Ordinance 124283.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Energy Code.CB 118779 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Energy Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125159October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Energy Code; amending Section 22.700.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adopting by reference Chapters 51-11C and 51-11R of the Washington Administrative Code, and amending certain sections of those chapters; and repealing Ordinance 124614 and Sections 2-9 of Ordinance 124284.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Building Code.CB 118781 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Building Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125161October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Building Code; amending Section 22.100.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adopting by reference Chapters 2 through 29, Chapters 31 through 33, and Chapter 35 of the 2015 International Building Code, and amending certain of those chapters; adopting a new Chapter 1 related to administration, permitting, and enforcement; adopting a new Chapter 30 related to elevators and conveying systems; and repealing Sections 2 through 27 of Ordinance 124273.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Mechanical Code.CB 118782 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Seattle Mechanical Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125162October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Mechanical Code; amending Section 22.400.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adopting by reference Chapters 2 through 9 and Chapters 11 through 16 of the 2015 International Mechanical Code with amendments; and adopting a new Chapter 1 related to administration, permitting, and enforcement; and repealing Sections 2 through 14 of Ordinance 124275.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates arterial and non-arterial speed limits.CB 118815 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates arterial and non-arterial speed limits.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125169October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien, Tim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to arterial and non-arterial speed limits; amending Sections 11.52.060 and 11.52.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $300,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Removing the sunset date for a five cent pass-through charge for certain recyclable paper bags.CB 118805 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid Waste Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Removing the sunset date for a five cent pass-through charge for certain recyclable paper bags.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125165October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City of Seattle’s solid waste system; removing the sunset date for a five cent pass-through charge for certain recyclable paper bags; requiring certain compostable bags to be labeled and tinted green; adding a definition for compostable; and amending Section 21.36.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes responding to Resolution 31577 to increase the Plan’s emphasis on race and social equity….CB 118683 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes responding to Resolution 31577 to increase the Plan’s emphasis on race and social equity….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125173October 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes responding to Resolution 31577 to increase the Plan’s emphasis on race and social equity and improve its readability; modifying or adding new goals and policies in several elements of the Plan that describe the City’s objectives for distributing housing and employment growth; and amending Sections 5.72.020, 23.34.008, 23.45.516, 23.47A.012, 23.47A.013, 23.49.056, 23.49.058, 23.51A.004, 23.58A.040, 23.69.030, 23.75.002, and 23.84A.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code to revise references to the updated Comprehensive Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Department to participate in the California Independent System Operator’s Energy Imbalance Market, including authorizing the execution of any necessary agreements….CB 118798 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Department to participate in the California Independent System Operator’s Energy Imbalance Market, including authorizing the execution of any necessary agreements….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125176November 4, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Department to participate in the California Independent System Operator’s Energy Imbalance Market, including authorizing the execution of any necessary agreements with the California Independent System Operator, as well as any additional agreements necessary or convenient for implementation and participation in the California Independent System Operator’s Energy Imbalance Market.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates street and sidewalk use.CB 118828 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates street and sidewalk use.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125186November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending Section 11.23.440 of the Seattle Municipal Code, to establish a formal parklet program in the public place.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,730. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts and simplifying cat and dog license fees.CB 118835 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts and simplifying cat and dog license fees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125193November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to pet licensing; adjusting and simplifying cat and dog license fees; and amending Section 9.26.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $331,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Seattle Department of Transportation.CB 118829 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentOrigin unclearPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Updates the Seattle Department of Transportation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125187November 28, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation; amending Section 11.16.312 of the Seattle Municipal Code to adjust Vanpool Parking Permit Fees.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes citywide community involvement principles.Res 31718 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoodsCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes citywide community involvement principles.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoodsCivil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to public outreach and engagement; establishing citywide community involvement principles; directing the Department of Neighborhoods to lead City departments in the development of community involvement plans; directing the Seattle Office for Civil Rights to assist City departments with the development of community outreach and engagement efforts that advance racial equity; directing the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs to develop a citywide language access strategy; and superseding Resolution 27709, Resolution 28115, and Resolution 28948.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Increasing the fee for marijuana business licenses.CB 118836 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Increasing the fee for marijuana business licenses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125194November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE increasing the fee for marijuana business licenses; amending Section 6.500.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $83,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts spaying and neutering fees at the Seattle Animal Shelter Spay and Neuter Clinic.CB 118838 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHomelessness Services Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts spaying and neutering fees at the Seattle Animal Shelter Spay and Neuter Clinic.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125196November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Animal Fee Ordinance; adjusting spaying and neutering fees at the Seattle Animal Shelter Spay and Neuter Clinic; and amending Section 9.26.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50,680. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118827 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125185November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending the Street Use Permit Fee Schedule authorized by Section 15.04.074 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $493,300. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Moving the Office of Labor Standards from a subsidiary unit in the Office for Civil Rights to its own unit in the….CB 118845 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Moving the Office of Labor Standards from a subsidiary unit in the Office for Civil Rights to its own unit in the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125203November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the organization of City government; moving the Office of Labor Standards from a subsidiary unit in the Office for Civil Rights to its own unit in the Executive Department; amending the powers and duties of the Office of Labor Standards; adding Sections 3.15.000, 3.15.002, 3.15.004, 3.15.006, 3.15.008, and 3.15.009 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); amending Sections 6.208.020, 14.16.010, 14.17.010, 14.19.010, 14.20.010, and 14.22.010 of the SMC; renumbering Section 3.14.934 of the SMC as Section 3.15.010; and repealing Section 3.14.945 of the SMC and Sections 3 and 4 of Ordinance 125135.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124909 to extend the duration of loan, increasing the loan amount to $4 million and establishing the City’s 2008 Parks….CB 118844 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originBridges & StructuresParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124909 to extend the duration of loan, increasing the loan amount to $4 million and establishing the City’s 2008 Parks….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125202November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Smith Cove project and the Capital Fund in the Department of Parks and Recreation; amending Ordinance 124909 to extend the duration of loan, increasing the loan amount to $4 million and establishing the City’s 2008 Parks and Green Spaces Levy as the lending fund for the Smith Cove interfund loan; and authorizing the loan of funds from the City’s 2008 Parks and Green Spaces Levy fund, or its participating funds, in the amount of $4,000,000 to the Parks Capital Fund for bridge financing of other Seattle Parks District approved capital projects.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $8,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124230.CB 118848 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124230.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125206November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to automated fixed camera revenue; amending Ordinance 124230; and amending Section 5.82.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $425,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates parking rates.CB 118855 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates parking rates.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125210November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to parking rates; amending Section 11.16.121 of the Seattle Municipal Code to set new limits on parking rates at parking payment devices.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $798,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Section 3.40.060 to the Seattle Municipal Code to require that the Auditor produce a biennial financial condition report.CB 118846 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Section 3.40.060 to the Seattle Municipal Code to require that the Auditor produce a biennial financial condition report.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125204November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Office of City Auditor; adding a new Section 3.40.060 to the Seattle Municipal Code to require that the Auditor produce a biennial financial condition report.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the loan of funds from the Finance and Administrative Services Fund in the amount of $6,500,000 to the General Subfund.CB 118864 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds from the Finance and Administrative Services Fund in the amount of $6,500,000 to the General Subfund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125212November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of Equitable Development Implementation Plan projects; authorizing the loan of funds from the Finance and Administrative Services Fund in the amount of $6,500,000 to the General Subfund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates street and sidewalk use.CB 118792 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates street and sidewalk use.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125220December 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; amending Section 11.40.250 of the Seattle Municipal Code to authorize the Play Street program as an allowable use of the public place.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $25,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates residential rental properties.CB 118817 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates residential rental properties.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125222December 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential rental properties; amending Sections 7.24.020, 7.24.030, 7.24.040, 7.24.050, 7.24.060, 7.24.070, and 7.24.080 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); adding new Sections 7.24.035, 7.24.036, 7.24.038, 7.24.110, 7.24.120, 7.24.130, 7.24.140, 7.24.150, 7.24.160, 7.24.170, 7.24.180, 7.24.190, 7.24.200, and 7.24.210 to the SMC; and repealing Section 7.24.090 of the SMC; all to limit the amount of security deposits and non-refundable move-in fees, to allow residential tenants to pay security deposits, non-refundable move-in fees, and last month’s rent in installments, and to establish enforcement provisions for Chapter 7.24.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation land and all other necessary property rights in the Taylor Creek….CB 118869 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation land and all other necessary property rights in the Taylor Creek….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125230December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation land and all other necessary property rights in the Taylor Creek area at 10018 Rainier Avenue South, Seattle, Washington, for addressing the identified need for permanent and temporary construction easements for the new alignment of the culvert crossing Rainier Avenue South, and to execute, accept, and record deeds and convenient documents and agreements deemed by the Director to be necessary to this transaction on behalf of the City; placing the conveyed real properties under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to grant the City of Kenmore limited permission to construct and manage a non-motorized, public….CB 118878 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to grant the City of Kenmore limited permission to construct and manage a non-motorized, public….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125232December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contractsfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Public Utilities Department; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to grant the City of Kenmore limited permission to construct and manage a non-motorized, public recreational trail on a portion of utility property in the Tolt Pipeline Right of Way; and authorizing the Director to execute an agreement for this property use.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning, expressing City Council's intent for implementation of Chapter 23.58B.CB 118854 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning, expressing City Council's intent for implementation of Chapter 23.58B.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125233December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, expressing City Council's intent for implementation of Chapter 23.58B; amending Sections 23.41.012, 23.58B.010, 23.58B.015, 23.58B.020, 23.58B.025, 23.58B.030, 23.58B.040, 23.58B.050, 23.58B.060, 23.76.006, and 25.05.675 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Section 23.58B.035 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $150. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the name of the Seattle Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Commission to the Seattle Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer (LGBTQ) Commission.CB 118873 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the name of the Seattle Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Commission to the Seattle Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer (LGBTQ) Commission.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125231December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE changing the name of the Seattle Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Commission to the Seattle Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer (LGBTQ) Commission; amending Chapter 3.14 and Section 15.52.005 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect the name change.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates rules for housing.CB 118881 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates rules for housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125228December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to housing; amending Sections 14.08.020 and 14.08.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code to add definitions, describe exceptions, and provide a compliance deadline for the first in time provision.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of a donation of real property in the Yesler Terrace neighborhood from the Housing Authority of the City of….CB 118320 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationElectricityNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of a donation of real property in the Yesler Terrace neighborhood from the Housing Authority of the City of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124710February 20, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationElectricityNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation and the City Light Department; authorizing the acceptance of a donation of real property in the Yesler Terrace neighborhood from the Housing Authority of the City of Seattle for open space, park, and recreation purposes; declaring certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department; authorizing the partial release of a City Light easement that affects property in the Yesler Terrace neighborhood, including the property to be donated; reallocating funding from the Acquisition Category Inflation Adjustment to the Opportunity Fund Category of the 2008 Parks and Green Spaces Levy; increasing appropriations to the Department of Parks and Recreation in the 2015 Adopted Budget; amending the 2015-2020 Adopted Capital Improvement Program; all by a three-fourths vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of an agreement with Seattle School District providing for the exchange of City-owned property at Garfield Playfield for District-owned property….CB 118321 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationYouth & Education Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of an agreement with Seattle School District providing for the exchange of City-owned property at Garfield Playfield for District-owned property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124712February 20, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing execution of an agreement with Seattle School District providing for the exchange of City-owned property at Garfield Playfield for District-owned property adjacent to the Rainier Beach Community Center; authorizing execution, acceptance and recording of Quitclaim Deeds and easements necessary for the development of the properties; authorizing execution of a lease for the Garfield Teen Life Center within Garfield High School; superseding Ordinance 118477, which adopted Initiative 42, for the purposes of this ordinance; and ratifying and confirming prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $920,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Seattle Municipal Code 3.33.120.CB 118323 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Seattle Municipal Code 3.33.120.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124708February 20, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the oath of office for Municipal Court judge; amending Seattle Municipal Code 3.33.120.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising the designated member representation of the Seattle Fire Code Advisory Board to include representatives of the services industry, major institutions, and….CB 118309 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising the designated member representation of the Seattle Fire Code Advisory Board to include representatives of the services industry, major institutions, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124707February 20, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Fire Code Advisory Board; revising the designated member representation of the Seattle Fire Code Advisory Board to include representatives of the services industry, major institutions, and the Fire Fighters and Fire Chiefs labor unions; creating a new Subchapter V in Chapter 3.16 of the Seattle Municipal Code consisting of new Sections 3.16.300, 3.16.310, 3.16.320, 3.16.330, 3.16.340, 3.16.350 and 3.16.360; all by amending Ordinance 119799.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Subsection 5.73.040.B of the Seattle Municipal Code to differentiate small efficiency dwelling units from other dwelling units for purposes of determining….CB 118324 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Subsection 5.73.040.B of the Seattle Municipal Code to differentiate small efficiency dwelling units from other dwelling units for purposes of determining….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124724February 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Clark
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program; amending Subsection 5.73.040.B of the Seattle Municipal Code to differentiate small efficiency dwelling units from other dwelling units for purposes of determining affordability requirements under the Multifamily Housing Property Tax Exemption Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates historic preservation, imposing controls upon the Yesler Terrace Steam Plant, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12….CB 118154 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates historic preservation, imposing controls upon the Yesler Terrace Steam Plant, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124717February 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation, imposing controls upon the Yesler Terrace Steam Plant, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Updates historic preservation, imposing controls upon the Seattle National Bank Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12….CB 117780 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates historic preservation, imposing controls upon the Seattle National Bank Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124716February 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation, imposing controls upon the Seattle National Bank Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an agreement between The City of Seattle and City Investors VII….CB 118303 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an agreement between The City of Seattle and City Investors VII….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124723February 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an agreement between The City of Seattle and City Investors VII, LLC for a full block reconstruction of 8th Avenue North, between Thomas and Harrison Streets.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Grants Acorn Development LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines for a site specific heat conveyance system and other….CB 118334 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Acorn Development LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines for a site specific heat conveyance system and other….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124726March 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Acorn Development LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines for a site specific heat conveyance system and other utilities under and across Lenora Street between 6th Avenue and 7th Avenue, and under and across 7th Avenue between Lenora Street and Blanchard Street; for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $8,305. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Eco District LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines for a site specific heat conveyance system under and….CB 118335 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Eco District LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines for a site specific heat conveyance system under and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124727March 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Eco District LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines for a site specific heat conveyance system under and along Virginia Street between 5th Avenue and 6th Avenue, and under and across 6th Avenue between Virginia Street and Lenora Street; for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $12,247. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Section 3.22.050 to the Seattle Municipal Code to authorize the Chief Technology Officer to enter into agreements with public….CB 118341 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Section 3.22.050 to the Seattle Municipal Code to authorize the Chief Technology Officer to enter into agreements with public….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124731March 19, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to colocation of the City’s data centers; adding a new Section 3.22.050 to the Seattle Municipal Code to authorize the Chief Technology Officer to enter into agreements with public and private entities for data center colocation space and services; including lease agreements for the City’s use and occupancy of data center colocation facilities, and agreements for related colocation services; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 21.60 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect advances in technology and changes in federal law, to create a logical….CB 118347 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Chapter 21.60 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect advances in technology and changes in federal law, to create a logical….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124736March 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s Cable Communications Ordinance; amending Chapter 21.60 of the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect advances in technology and changes in federal law, to create a logical organization of the Chapter for ease of reference, to promote competition in cable services, to enhance consumer protection, and to reserve the City’s authority in a fluid regulatory environment; updating the membership requirements and duties of the Citizens’ Telecommunications and Technology Advisory Board, renaming it the Community Technology Advisory Board, and moving the requirements and duties of the Board from Chapter 21.60 to Chapter 3.22; renaming Subtitle V of Title 21 and Chapter 21.60; amending Sections 3.02.125, 21.60.010, 21.60.020, 21.60.030, 21.60.040, 21.60.050, 21.60.060, 21.60.080, 21.60.090, 21.60.100, 21.60.110, 21.60.120, 21.60.130, 21.60.140, 21.60.150, 21.60.160, 21.60.170, 21.60.180, 21.60.190, 21.60.200, 21.60.210, 21.60.220, 21.60.240, 21.60.250, 21.60.260, 21.60.270, 21.60.280, 21.60.800, 21.60.820, and 21.60.830; repealing Sections 21.60.230, 21.60.290, 21.60.295, 21.60.300, 21.60.310, 21.60.320, 21.60.330, 21.60.340, 21.60.350, 21.60.360, 21.60.370, 21.60.380, 21.60.390, 21.60.400, 21.60.440, 21.60.450, 21.60.460, 21.60.470, 21.60.480, 21.60.490, 21.60.500, 21.60.510, 21.60.520, 21.60.530, 21.60.540, 21.60.550, 21.60.560, 21.60.570, 21.60.580, 21.60.590, 21.60.600, 21.60.620, 21.60.630, 21.60.640, 21.60.650, 21.60.660, 21.60.670, 21.60.680, 21.60.690, 21.60.700, 21.60.710, and 21.60.810; and adding Sections 3.22.050, 21.60.070, 21.60.125, 21.60.825, 21.60.840, and 21.60.850 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and repealing Ordinance 123461.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Seattle Municipal Code sections 22.206.160 and 22.214.075 to prohibit evictions of residential tenants from rental housing units if the units are….CB 118340 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Seattle Municipal Code sections 22.206.160 and 22.214.075 to prohibit evictions of residential tenants from rental housing units if the units are….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124738March 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Clark
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Seattle Municipal Code sections 22.206.160 and 22.214.075 to prohibit evictions of residential tenants from rental housing units if the units are not registered with the Department of Planning and Development as required by SMC 22.214.040.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Lifting a budget proviso imposed on Finance General's Reserves Budget Control Level.CB 118349 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Lifting a budget proviso imposed on Finance General's Reserves Budget Control Level.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124742April 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Clark
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to incentivizing regional partners to develop homeless shelters; lifting a budget proviso imposed on Finance General's Reserves Budget Control Level; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; making cash transfers between various City funds; and amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $175,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Columbia Center Property LLC permission to continue to maintain and operate a pedestrian tunnel under and across 5th Avenue, south of….CB 118354 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Columbia Center Property LLC permission to continue to maintain and operate a pedestrian tunnel under and across 5th Avenue, south of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124746April 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Columbia Center Property LLC permission to continue to maintain and operate a pedestrian tunnel under and across 5th Avenue, south of Columbia Street, and under and across Columbia Street, east of 5th Avenue, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $49,184. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Lifting a budget proviso imposed on Finance General’s Reserves Budget Control Level.CB 118325 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Lifting a budget proviso imposed on Finance General’s Reserves Budget Control Level.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124741April 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Clark
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to unsheltered homelessness; lifting a budget proviso imposed on Finance General’s Reserves Budget Control Level; changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; making cash transfers between various City funds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone: Executive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118310 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124747April 10, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.42.054, 23.54.015, 23.76.004, 23.76.006, 23.76.032, and 23.84A.038 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding new Section 23.42.056; to permit transitional encampments for homeless individuals as an interim use on City-owned or private property.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $7,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan provisions in the Shoreline District.CB 118311 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan provisions in the Shoreline District.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124750April 10, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Shoreline Master Program; amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan provisions in the Shoreline District; amending Sections 23.60A.020, 23.60A.066, 23.60A.090, 23.60A.152, 23.60A.154, 23.60A.156, 23.60A.157, 23.60A.164, 23.60A.167, 23.60A.172, 23.60A.187, 23.60A.190, 23.60A.193, 23.60A.200, 23.60A.202, 23.60A.204, 23.60A.206, 23.60A.214, 23.60A.215, 23.60A.217, 23.60A.224, 23.60A.240, 23.60A.252, 23.60A.282, 23.60A.294, 23.60A.310, 23.60A.382, 23.60A.384, 23.60A.386, 23.60A.388, 23.60A.390, 23.60A.392, 23.60A.394, 23.60A.402, 23.60A.410, 23.60A.442, 23.60A.446, 23.60A.450, 23.60A.460, 23.60A.482, 23.60A.484, 23.60A.486, 23.60A.490, 23.60A.502, 23.60A.504, 23.60A.506, 23.60A.508, 23.60A.510, 23.60A.512, 23.60A.540, 23.60A.575, 23.60A.578, 23.60A.902, 23.60A.906, 23.60A.908, 23.60A.912, 23.60A.914, 23.60A.916, 23.60A.918, 23.60A.924, 23.60A.926, 23.60A.928, 23.60A.930, 23.60A.934, 23.60A.936, 23.60A.938, 23.60A.942, 23.60A.944, 23.60A.958, 23.60A.970, 23.72.006, 23.91.002 of the Shoreline Master Program Regulations of the SMC, adding new Sections 23.60A.155, 23.60A.159, 23.60A.203, 23.60A.383, 23.60A.483, 23.60A.503 and repealing Sections 23.60A.092 of the Shoreline Master Program Regulations; amending Section 25.09.020 of the environmentally critical areas regulations, and adding a new Section 25.09.016 to the environmentally critical areas regulations of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $400,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.CB 118365 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureOrigin unclearBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Authorizes the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124759April 24, 2015
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contractsfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget, including the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation; adding a new project; revising allocations for certain projects in the 2015-2020 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Increasing civil assessments for failure to timely file reports.CB 118370 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Increasing civil assessments for failure to timely file reports.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124757April 24, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE increasing civil assessments for failure to timely file reports; amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 2.04.330.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $150. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle….CB 118357 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124762May 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds; authorizing the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle Ordinance 114978; and authorizing the deposit of 2012 supplemental allocations, 2013 supplemental allocations, and 2014 allocations from King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds into the City of Seattle’s 2008 Parks Levy Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,261,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of monetary donations from the Seattle Parks Foundation, Friends of Rainier Beach Urban Farm, and Seattle Tilth to support….CB 118387 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of monetary donations from the Seattle Parks Foundation, Friends of Rainier Beach Urban Farm, and Seattle Tilth to support….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124768May 15, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Opportunity Fund category of the 2008 Parks and Green Spaces Levy; authorizing the acceptance of monetary donations from the Seattle Parks Foundation, Friends of Rainier Beach Urban Farm, and Seattle Tilth to support the existing Rainier Beach Urban Farm and Wetlands Improvements project (K730153); increasing appropriations to the Department of Parks and Recreation in the 2015 Adopted Budget; and amending the 2015-2020 Adopted Capital Improvement Program; all by a three-fourths vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,644,840. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 77….CB 118388 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective BargainingCompensation & Benefits Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 77….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124771May 15, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective BargainingCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 77 Material Controllers Unit to be effective January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015; authorizing the payment of compensation negotiated in the collective bargaining agreement; and ratifying and confirming prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32) to rezone certain land in 42 neighborhood-commercial zones to add the "P" suffix for….CB 118383 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32) to rezone certain land in 42 neighborhood-commercial zones to add the "P" suffix for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124770May 15, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, amending the SDOT Street Use Fee Schedule for installing, maintaining, or removing awnings or marquees, amending Attachment A to Ordinance No. 123477; amending the Official Land Use Map (Chapter 23.32) to rezone certain land in 42 neighborhood-commercial zones to add the "P" suffix for new and expanded pedestrian-designated areas; amending the development standards for areas with pedestrian designations, amending Chapter 23.47A and Sections 23.41.012, 23.54.015, 23.54.020, and 23.84A.048 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates historic preservation, imposing controls upon the McGilvra Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of….CB 118367 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates historic preservation, imposing controls upon the McGilvra Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124777May 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation, imposing controls upon the McGilvra Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 118375 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMS Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124774May 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceFire & EMS
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Police Department, and the Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants and private funding and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,180,620. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 8118 Greenwood Avenue North.CB 118392 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 8118 Greenwood Avenue North.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124784May 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 8118 Greenwood Avenue North; authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a three-fourths vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a contract with Rabanco, Ltd. to provide recycling processing services for the….CB 118396 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid WasteProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a contract with Rabanco, Ltd. to provide recycling processing services for the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124789June 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a contract with Rabanco, Ltd. to provide recycling processing services for the City of Seattle; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,512,495. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation land and all other necessary property rights in the Taylor Creek….CB 118406 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation land and all other necessary property rights in the Taylor Creek….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124791June 26, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire by negotiation land and all other necessary property rights in the Taylor Creek area at 10005 Rainier Avenue South, Seattle, Washington for sediment management and fish enhancement, and to execute, accept and record deeds and convenient documents and agreements deemed by the Director to be necessary to this transaction on behalf of the City; placing the conveyed real properties under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants SDC Creative LLC permission to maintain and operate a skybridge over and across South Orcas Street, east of 5th Avenue South….CB 118421 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originBridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentArts & Culture Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants SDC Creative LLC permission to maintain and operate a skybridge over and across South Orcas Street, east of 5th Avenue South….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124797July 7, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting SDC Creative LLC permission to maintain and operate a skybridge over and across South Orcas Street, east of 5th Avenue South, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $16,124. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118385 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124803July 10, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Sections 23.41.004, 23.45.510, 23.45.512, 23.45.514, 23.45.518, 23.84A.014, and 23.86.002 of the Seattle Municipal Code to amend Lowrise Zone multi-family development standards and establish a new design review threshold for Lowrise 2 zones.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Concerning a voter-proposed Initiative Measure that concerns public participation in government, including publicly-financed election campaigns, regulating campaign donations and regulating lobbying activities.Res 31600 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Concerning a voter-proposed Initiative Measure that concerns public participation in government, including publicly-financed election campaigns, regulating campaign donations and regulating lobbying activities.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 13, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION concerning a voter-proposed Initiative Measure that concerns public participation in government, including publicly-financed election campaigns, regulating campaign donations and regulating lobbying activities; authorizing the City Clerk and the Executive Director of the Ethics and Elections Commission to take those actions necessary to enable the proposed Initiative to appear on the November 3, 2015 ballot and the local voters' pamphlet; requesting the King County Elections' Director to place the proposed City Charter amendment on the November 3, 2015 election ballot; and providing for the publication of such proposed amendment.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Related to cable television.CB 118411 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to cable television.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124810July 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to cable television; authorizing the Mayor or his designee to enter into a new Cable Television Franchise Agreement and an agreement regarding additional public benefits with Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink; authorizing the Chief Technology Officer to enter into other agreements for the purpose of implementing or administering the new franchise; increasing appropriations in the 2015 budget of the Department of Information Technology for costs incurred in processing the franchise application; and transferring cash received for processing the franchise application; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 2: the rule or service directly applies citywide or through a citywide system. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $40,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 2Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to business licenses.CB 118420 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to business licenses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124808July 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to business licenses; amending Sections 5.30.030, 5.30.060, 5.32.150, 5.40.060, 5.40.080, 5.40.085, 5.45.110, 5.55.030, 5.55.040, 5.55.220, and 5.55.230 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 5.55.238 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides the Office of City Auditor independent audit authority, including access to employer records, after a case is closed by the Seattle….CB 118428 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originGovernment AccountabilityCivil Rights Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides the Office of City Auditor independent audit authority, including access to employer records, after a case is closed by the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124809July 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Government AccountabilityCivil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE providing the Office of City Auditor independent audit authority, including access to employer records, after a case is closed by the Seattle Office for Civil Rights (SOCR) in order to evaluate SOCR’s enforcement efforts of Chapters 14.16, 14.17, 14.19, and 14.20 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC); amending Sections 3.40.040, 14.16.060, and 14.20.050 of the SMC; and creating a new Section 14.19.065 of the SMC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG Contact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure concerning public participation in government, including creation of a publicly-financed election campaign program and regulation of campaign….Res 31601 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure concerning public participation in government, including creation of a publicly-financed election campaign program and regulation of campaign….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 20, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure concerning public participation in government, including creation of a publicly-financed election campaign program and regulation of campaign donations and lobbying; authorizing the City Clerk and the Executive Director of the Ethics and Elections Commission to take those actions necessary to enable the proposed Initiative to appear on the November 3, 2015 election ballot and the local voters' pamphlet; requesting the King County Elections' Director to place the proposed initiative on the November 3, 2015 election ballot; providing for the publication of such initiative; and repealing Resolution 31600.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to sign a lease with Sprint Communications Company L.P. for continuing use of subsurface fiber-optic….CB 118434 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to sign a lease with Sprint Communications Company L.P. for continuing use of subsurface fiber-optic….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124821July 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to sign a lease with Sprint Communications Company L.P. for continuing use of subsurface fiber-optic cable installed in the Burke-Gilman Trail.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the rates, terms and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department to customers in….CB 118443 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the rates, terms and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department to customers in….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124818July 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the rates, terms and conditions for the use and sale of electricity supplied by the City Light Department to customers in the city of SeaTac; and amending Sections 21.49.020, 21.49.030, 21.49.040, 21.49.052, 21.49.055, 21.49.057, 21.49.081, and 21.49.100 of the Seattle Municipal Code to implement new rates for the city of SeaTac that reflect the terms of the 2015 franchise agreement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $112,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use, zoning, and environmental policy.CB 118407 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use, zoning, and environmental policy.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124843August 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use, zoning, and environmental policy; amending Sections 3.58.070, 3.58.090, 23.22.024, 23.24.020, 23.28.030, 23.34.009, 23.40.060, 23.41.004, 23.41.008, 23.41.010, 23.41.012, 23.42.038, 23.44.010, 23.44.014, 23.44.041, 23.44.051, 23.45.504, 23.45.508, 23.45.510, 23.45.512, 23.45.518, 23.45.526, 23.45.529, 23.45.532, 23.45.536, 23.45.570, 23.46.002, 23.47A.004, 23.47A.012, 23.47A.013, 23.47A.014, 23.47A.016, 23.47A.032, 23.47A.039, 23.48.010, 23.49.008, 23.49.010, 23.49.012, 23.49.013, 23.49.041, 23.49.178, 23.49.242, Map 1I in Chapter 23.49, 23.50.020, 23.53.006, 23.53.015, 23.54.015, 23.54.025, 23.54.030, 23.58A.044, 23.66­.020, 23.67.060, 23.75.140, 23.75.180, 23.76.006, 23.76.012, 23.76.026, 23.76.032, 23.84A.002, 23.84A.008, 23.84A.012, 23.84A.032, 23.84A.038, 23.86.006, 23.86.010, 23.86.012, 23.86.016, 23.88.020, 25.05.164, 25.05.508, 25.05.510, 25.05.610, 25.05.756, 25.05.800, 25.05.920, 25.05.960, 25.06.030, 25.06.050, 25.08.425, 25.08.590, and 25.08.655, and repealing Section 23.40.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code, to correct typographical errors, correct section references, clarify regulations, and make minor amendments; and amending the Wallingford Design Guidelines to update the title page and to correct the map of the Wallingford Planning Area Boundary.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City Light Department.CB 118479 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124836August 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; and amending Section 21.49.042 of the Seattle Municipal code to align income eligibility guidelines for the utility-funded Emergency Low-Income Assistance program with other city rate assistance programs and allow year-round program operation.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $30,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 118452 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPolicePermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124837August 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PolicePermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Executive Department, Department of Planning and Development, Department of Parks and Recreation, Human Services Department, Seattle Police Department, and the Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants and private funding and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,675,941. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Chief of Police to issue Special Police Officer Commissions to qualified government employees to conduct limited law enforcement duties or….CB 118476 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolice Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Chief of Police to issue Special Police Officer Commissions to qualified government employees to conduct limited law enforcement duties or….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124848September 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Police Department; authorizing the Chief of Police to issue Special Police Officer Commissions to qualified government employees to conduct limited law enforcement duties or to former police officers or parking enforcement officers to conduct traffic control; eliminating the authority to authorize Retired Police Officer Commissions; amending Section 3.28.150, and repealing Sections 3.28.450, 3.28.460, 3.28.470, and 3.28.480 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Cedar River Municipal Watershed and amending the Secondary Use Policies, adopted by Ordinance 114632, to provide for the limited application….CB 118481 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & Habitat Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Cedar River Municipal Watershed and amending the Secondary Use Policies, adopted by Ordinance 114632, to provide for the limited application….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124852September 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Cedar River Municipal Watershed and amending the Secondary Use Policies, adopted by Ordinance 114632, to provide for the limited application of the herbicide Imazapyr to treat invasive knotweed species.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City’s Emergency Management Program.CB 118483 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originEmergency Management Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City’s Emergency Management Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124849September 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Emergency Management
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ORDINANCE related to the City’s Emergency Management Program; adding Sections 10.02.045 and 10.02.047 to the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to refine the roles and responsibilities of the Office of Emergency Management; and amending Sections 10.02.050, 10.02.060, 10.02.070, 10.02.080, 10.02.090, 10.02.100, and 10.02.110 of the SMC to accommodate these refinements.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Landmark Preservation Board.CB 118468 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Landmark Preservation Board.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124851September 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Landmark Preservation Board; amending Section 25.12.270 of the Seattle Municipal Code to change the qualifications for members of the Board, and making technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes five years of ecological thinning, in accordance with the Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan, in Sections 15, 16, 21 and….CB 118484 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes five years of ecological thinning, in accordance with the Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan, in Sections 15, 16, 21 and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124853September 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Cedar River Watershed; authorizing five years of ecological thinning, in accordance with the Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan, in Sections 15, 16, 21 and 22, Township 22, North, Range 7, East, W.M., Sections 8 and 9, Township 22, North, Range 8, East, W.M., Sections 2 and 11, Township 21, North, Range 9, East, W.M.; Sections 34 and 35, Township 22, North, Range 9, East, W.M., Sections 3, 4 and 10, Township 21, North, Range 10, East, W.M., and Sections 32 and 33, Township 22, North, Range 10, East, W.M.; declaring the logs resulting from ecological thinning to be surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of such logs pursuant to applicable City contracting and surplus property sale procedures; and directing deposit of the proceeds therefrom to the Water Fund for the purposes of the Habitat Conservation Plan implementation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $7,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates City employment, adopting a 2015 Citywide Position List.CB 118492 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates City employment, adopting a 2015 Citywide Position List.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124857September 24, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, adopting a 2015 Citywide Position List.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are the defined City workforce. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to rental housing.CB 118403 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to rental housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124862September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to rental housing; and amending Seattle Municipal Code subsection 22.206.160.C to require the owners of rental housing units to provide additional advance written notice to tenants prior to eviction.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118446 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124869September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 23.41.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) to adopt revised Neighborhood Design Guidelines for the Roosevelt Urban Village; and amending Section 23.41.012 of the SMC to replace Map A for 23.41.012 and make minor corrections to clarify legislative intent.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle….CB 118489 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124866September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds; authorizing the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle Ordinance 114978; and authorizing the deposit of 2015 allocations from King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds into the City of Seattle’s 2008 Parks Levy Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes implementation of certain Neighborhood Matching Fund projects in 2015, and specifying that 2015 appropriations for the Neighborhood Matching Subfund shall carry….CB 118477 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originNeighborhoodsBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes implementation of certain Neighborhood Matching Fund projects in 2015, and specifying that 2015 appropriations for the Neighborhood Matching Subfund shall carry….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124871September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Neighborhoods; authorizing implementation of certain Neighborhood Matching Fund projects in 2015, and specifying that 2015 appropriations for the Neighborhood Matching Subfund shall carry forward automatically to future budget years.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,961,190. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the appropriations for Seattle Center.CB 118490 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the appropriations for Seattle Center.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124867September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the appropriations for Seattle Center; amending Ordinance 124648, which adopted the 2015 Budget; amending Ordinance 124349, which adopted the 2014 Budget; lifting a proviso; and changing appropriations within the Seattle Center Department.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,914,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 3650 34th Avenue South.CB 118493 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 3650 34th Avenue South.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124868September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 3650 34th Avenue South; and authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes new titles and/or salaries.CB 118503 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes new titles and/or salaries.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124863September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment commonly referred to as the Second Quarter 2015 Employment Ordinance; establishing new titles and/or salaries; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 4.13.010; amending Seattle Municipal Code Section 4.72.080; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the Cheasty Greenspace Trails and Bike Park Pilot Project and amending Section 5 of Ordinance 124546.CB 118506 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTraffic SafetyParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the Cheasty Greenspace Trails and Bike Park Pilot Project and amending Section 5 of Ordinance 124546.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124876October 5, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic SafetyParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the Cheasty Greenspace Trails and Bike Park Pilot Project and amending Section 5 of Ordinance 124546.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Making technical corrections.CB 118429 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Making technical corrections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124883October 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, amending the Official Land Use Map at pages 72, 73, 87, 101, 102, 133, 145 to designate new zone names, repealing and replacing Chapter 23.48, amending Sections 22.210.030, 22.900G.015, 23.30.010, 23.34.009, 23.34.128, 23.41.012, 23.42.124, 23.42.126, 23.42.128, 23.47A.012, 23.49.011, 23.66.140, 23.84A.004, 23.84A.038, 23.84A.048, 23.86.007, 25.05.800, and 25.08.100 to reorganize, make corrections, and update standards for the Seattle Mixed Zones; and making technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,500. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
AN ORDINANCE, relating to land use and zoning, amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes needed as part of the periodic….CB 118469 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

AN ORDINANCE, relating to land use and zoning, amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes needed as part of the periodic….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124887October 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE, relating to land use and zoning, amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes needed as part of the periodic review and to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2014-2015 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process and amending Section 23.52.004 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning.CB 118518 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124885October 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Section 25.05.800 of the Seattle Municipal Code to repeal the categorical exemption for SEPA review of proposed “infill” development.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $45,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a lease agreement with Boyer Children’s Clinic to occupy and use a….CB 118515 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a lease agreement with Boyer Children’s Clinic to occupy and use a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124881October 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a lease agreement with Boyer Children’s Clinic to occupy and use a portion of Building 11 at Warren G. Magnuson Park for a children’s clinic and related general office purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,884,873. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes requirements for residential tenancies.CB 118516 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTenant Protections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes requirements for residential tenancies.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124882October 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien, Nick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the provision of tenant relocation assistance to displaced tenants; establishing requirements for residential tenancies; establishing regulations about penalties and the issuance of building permits for violators of the Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance; amending Sections 7.24.030, 7.24.050, 10.09.085, 22.210.030, 22.210.140, 22.210.150, and 22.210.180 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adding a new Section 22.210.136; amending Section 106.6.3 of the 2012 Seattle Building Code; and amending Section R105.6.3 of the 2012 Seattle Residential Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $90,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish County for the provision of Jail Services.CB 118504 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish County for the provision of Jail Services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124922December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to jail services; authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish County for the provision of Jail Services; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates financial management practices.CB 118527 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates financial management practices.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124921December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to financial management practices; amending Section 5.08.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code and repealing Section 5.08.025 and Chapter 5.33 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $15,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Department of Planning and Development.CB 118538 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Department of Planning and Development.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124918December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to fees and charges for permits and activities of the Department of Planning and Development; amending Seattle Municipal Code Sections 22.900B.010 and 22.900C.010.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $632,132. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts cat and dog license fees.CB 118539 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts cat and dog license fees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124923December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to pet licensing; adjusting cat and dog license fees; and amending Section 9.26.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $116,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Central Waterfront Project, authorizing amendment of the “Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Renovation and Expansion of the Seattle Aquarium and Development….CB 118545 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Central Waterfront Project, authorizing amendment of the “Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Renovation and Expansion of the Seattle Aquarium and Development….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124908December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Waterfront Project, authorizing amendment of the “Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Renovation and Expansion of the Seattle Aquarium and Development of the Central Waterfront” between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Aquarium Society.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.CB 118531 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceFire & EMSHuman Services & Food Security Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124899December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMSHuman Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing, in 2015, acceptance of funding from non-City sources; authorizing the heads of the Human Services Department, Seattle Fire Department, Seattle Police Department and the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to accept specified grants, private funding and donations and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,903,583. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the annual budget of the Office of Arts and Culture.CB 118533 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the annual budget of the Office of Arts and Culture.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124901December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the annual budget of the Office of Arts and Culture; amending Section 5.40.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $540,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the loan of funds from the City’s Consolidated (Residual) Cash Pool, or its participating funds, in the amount of $560,000, to….CB 118534 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originBridges & StructuresParks & Recreation Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the loan of funds from the City’s Consolidated (Residual) Cash Pool, or its participating funds, in the amount of $560,000, to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124909December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Smith Cove project in the Department of Parks and Recreation; and authorizing the loan of funds from the City’s Consolidated (Residual) Cash Pool, or its participating funds, in the amount of $560,000, to the Parks Capital Fund for bridge financing of the Smith Cove project.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $6,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the 2017 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund.CB 118535 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originBridges & StructuresTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the 2017 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124925December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Haller Lake Improvements project in the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; establishing the 2017 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund; authorizing the loan of funds from the City’s Consolidated (Residual) Cash Pool, or its participating funds, in the amount of $1,500,000, to the 2017 Multipurpose LTGO Bond Fund for bridge financing of the Haller Lake Improvements project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates taxation of utilities in The City of Seattle.CB 118537 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates taxation of utilities in The City of Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124912December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxation of utilities in The City of Seattle; amending Section 5.48.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $400,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a new Office of Planning and Community Development and a new Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections.CB 118556 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a new Office of Planning and Community Development and a new Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124919December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing a new Office of Planning and Community Development and a new Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections; abolishing the Department of Planning and Development; and amending the Seattle Municipal Code to implement those organizational changes and make technical revisions; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing support for a $5,000,000 payment to the Seattle Opera for enhancements or other public benefits to the renovation or replacement of….Res 31628 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing support for a $5,000,000 payment to the Seattle Opera for enhancements or other public benefits to the renovation or replacement of….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Center Department; expressing support for a $5,000,000 payment to the Seattle Opera for enhancements or other public benefits to the renovation or replacement of the Mercer Arena.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to exemption from admission tax.CB 118557 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to exemption from admission tax.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124903December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to exemption from admission tax; amending Section 5.40.085 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the annual budget of the Office of Arts and Culture.CB 118553 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureBudget & Appropriations Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the annual budget of the Office of Arts and Culture.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124906December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the annual budget of the Office of Arts and Culture; amending Section 5.40.120 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone: Executive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the former Ambaum, Andover, Dakota, Delridge, Dumar, Fauntleroy, Glendale, and White Center Substation properties as surplus to the City’s needs and….CB 118559 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the former Ambaum, Andover, Dakota, Delridge, Dumar, Fauntleroy, Glendale, and White Center Substation properties as surplus to the City’s needs and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124917December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring the former Ambaum, Andover, Dakota, Delridge, Dumar, Fauntleroy, Glendale, and White Center Substation properties as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purpose; authorizing the sale of the former White Center Substation to King County, the sale of the former Ambaum Substation to the City of Burien, and the sale of the former Andover, Dakota, Delridge, Dumar, Fauntleroy, and Glendale Substations for fair market value through negotiated or brokered sales to be managed by the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the City Light Department; and authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department to execute all necessary documents to accomplish such property sales and to deposit the proceeds in the City Light Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,989,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Pike Place Market Historical Commission.CB 118467 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the Pike Place Market Historical Commission.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124935December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Pike Place Market Historical Commission; amending Section 25.24.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code to revise the number, categories, and appointing authority for Commission positions; and making technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use.CB 118523 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124952December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use; amending Sections 22.170.190, 23.41.018, 23.43.008, 23.43.010, 23.43.012, 23.44.014, 23.44.022, 23.44.024, 23.44.034, 23.45.516, 23.45.518, 23.45.522, 23.45.536, 23.47A.009, 23.47A.014, 23.47A.016, 23.47A.024, 23.49.019, 23.49.036, 23.49.041, 23.50.034, 23.57.008, 23.75.140, 23.84A.014, and 23.84A.028 of the Seattle Municipal Code to integrate low impact development into land development codes, standards, and rules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $37,500. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City’s Emergency Management Program.Res 31632 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originEmergency Management Up to 4 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City’s Emergency Management Program.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Emergency Management
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the City’s Emergency Management Program; amending the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Base Plan, Emergency Operations Plan, and All-Hazards Mitigation Plan as required by Seattle Municipal Code Section 10.02.050, RCW 38.52.077, and WAC 118-30-060.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Addressing low impact development requirements in the City of Seattle’s Phase I Municipal Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System general permit issued….CB 118525 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Addressing low impact development requirements in the City of Seattle’s Phase I Municipal Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System general permit issued….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124951December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to street and sidewalk use; addressing low impact development requirements in the City of Seattle’s Phase I Municipal Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System general permit issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology; correcting typographical errors and section references, clarifying regulations, and making minor amendments; and amending Sections 15.02.042, 15.02.044, 15.02.046, 15.04.010, 15.04.035, 15.06.050, 15.20.070, 15.22.060, 15.22.080, 15.22.100, 15.22.110, 15.32.160, 15.36.010, 15.44.030, 15.46.020, 15.70.030, 15.72.010, and 15.91.016 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates land use and zoning, amending Section 23.47A.004 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow for the expansion of up to 20,000….CB 118548 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates land use and zoning, amending Section 23.47A.004 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow for the expansion of up to 20,000….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124947December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning, amending Section 23.47A.004 of the Seattle Municipal Code to allow for the expansion of up to 20,000 square feet of existing medical services uses in Neighborhood Commercial 1 zones.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City’s criminal code.CB 118576 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City’s criminal code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124949December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s criminal code; amending Sections 6.36.020, 12A.06.120, 12A.06.180, 12A.06.195, 12A.14.080, 12A.16.030, 12A.20.100, 12A.24.010, 12A.24.150, 18.12.255, and 18.12.257 of the Seattle Municipal Code and adding Sections 12A.10.150, 12A.10.220, and 12A.24.105 to the Seattle Municipal Code to conform the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and make technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City’s traffic code.CB 118577 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City’s traffic code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124950December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City’s traffic code; amending Sections 11.14.055, 11.14.184, 11.23.380, 11.23.400, 11.31.020, 11.34.020, 11.56.020, 11.56.025, 11.56.320, 11.56.350, 11.56.355, 11.57.310, 11.72.065, and 11.84.380 of the Seattle Municipal Code, adding Section 11.58.435 to the Seattle Municipal Code, and repealing Section 11.14.185 of the Seattle Municipal Code to conform the Seattle Municipal Code with changes in state law and make technical corrections.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding a new Section 22.202.070 to the Seattle Municipal Code.CB 118578 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding a new Section 22.202.070 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124945December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Construction and Land Use Fund; adding a new Section 22.202.070 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone: Executive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Office of Housing to enter into and administer an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with King County, Pierce County….CB 118583 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Office of Housing to enter into and administer an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with King County, Pierce County….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124948December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to affordable housing; authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing to enter into and administer an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County, and the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Kenmore, Kirkland, Mercer Island, Redmond, and Woodinville to create and operate a Regional Equitable Development Initiative Fund (REDI Fund) for the Puget Sound Region; and providing that 2015 appropriations for the REDI Fund shall automatically carry forward into the 2016 fiscal year.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates taxicab, transportation network company, and for-hire vehicle drivers.CB 118499 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originElections Up to 4 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates taxicab, transportation network company, and for-hire vehicle drivers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124968December 23, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata, Mike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to taxicab, transportation network company, and for-hire vehicle drivers; amending Section 6.310.110 of the Seattle Municipal Code; adding a new Section 6.310.735 to the Seattle Municipal Code; and authorizing the election of driver representatives.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value4
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers reservoir property to Seattle Transportation for new street, sidewalk, and public right-of-way uses.CB 121155 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers reservoir property to Seattle Transportation for new street, sidewalk, and public right-of-way uses.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127395February 25, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Bitter Lake Reservoir Replacement Project; transferring partial jurisdiction of a portion of Seattle Public Utilities’ Bitter Lake Reservoir property to the Seattle Department of Transportation, situated in a portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 19, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, and Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 3, Allendale; designating the property for street and sidewalk purposes; and laying it off as right-of-way.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Joins a regional forum coordinating long-term drinking-water supply across King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties.CB 121160 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Joins a regional forum coordinating long-term drinking-water supply across King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127396February 25, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into an interlocal agreement to participate in the regional Water Supply Forum to coordinate and collaborate on current and future regional drinking water supply issues in King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Orders a review of city data practices and stronger privacy standards for future contracts.Res 32194 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Orders a review of city data practices and stronger privacy standards for future contracts.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 23, 2026
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming data and privacy protections for any person seeking or accessing City programs or services; requesting a review of the City’s data collection and sharing practices to limit data exposure to the federal government and to other local, regional, and state jurisdictions; and requesting that departments incorporate privacy standards into future contracting requirements.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Sells part of City Light property to Snohomish County for road use while retaining a transmission easement.CB 121183 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sells part of City Light property to Snohomish County for road use while retaining a transmission easement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127417April 14, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property surplus to the needs of the City Light Department; authorizing the sale of a portion of City Light Department real property for road purposes to Snohomish County; reserving an easement for electric transmission line purposes; and accepting the payment of fair market value for the property sold, and deposit of the payment into the Light Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $452,216. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Raises or adjusts pay ranges for employees in Seattle's information-technology compensation program.CB 121188 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Raises or adjusts pay ranges for employees in Seattle's information-technology compensation program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127426April 30, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adjusting the pay zones for titles in the City’s Information Technology Professional (ITP) Compensation Program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves City Light's 2026 plan for meeting Seattle's future electricity needs.Res 32206 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves City Light's 2026 plan for meeting Seattle's future electricity needs.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 26, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving the 2026 Integrated Resource Plan as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle and the requirements of the State of Washington; and approving the Integrated Resource Plan for the biennium September 2026 through August 2028.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts housing-levy plans and funding policies for low-income housing programs through 2028.CB 121218 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts housing-levy plans and funding policies for low-income housing programs through 2028.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127460July 8, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to housing for low-income households; adopting the 2023 Seattle Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2026-2028; adopting Housing Funding Policies for program years 2026-2028 for the 2023 Seattle Housing Levy and other fund sources; authorizing actions by the Director of Housing regarding past and future housing loans and contracts; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Buys two Central Area parcels for affordable homeownership and selects a developer for the land.CB 121238 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Buys two Central Area parcels for affordable homeownership and selects a developer for the land.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127463July 8, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the Office of Housing; authorizing the acquisition of two parcels in the Central Area for the purpose of developing affordable homeownership units; placing the property under the jurisdiction of the Office of Housing; authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing or the Director’s designee to issue a request for proposals and to select a developer and thereafter to execute and deliver a contract for transfer of land, deed, and related documents; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts City Light's six-year strategic plan and its proposed path for customer rates.Res 32210 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts City Light's six-year strategic plan and its proposed path for customer rates.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 9, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution relating to the City Light Department; adopting a 2027-2032 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing the associated rate path.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a job classification and pay scale for forensic digital-evidence employees in the Police Department.CB 121207 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a job classification and pay scale for forensic digital-evidence employees in the Police Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127469July 17, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to City employment; establishing the Forensic Digital Evidence classification title series and corresponding rates of pay in the Seattle Police Department.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $121,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a modernized classification and pay structure for Seattle's information-technology employees.CB 121225 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a modernized classification and pay structure for Seattle's information-technology employees.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127476July 31, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to City employment; establishing the new Information Technology (IT) Talent Modernization classification title structure and corresponding rates of pay for IT positions across City departments.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adds Fire Protection Engineer positions to a labor agreement with Professional and Technical Employees Local 17.CB 121256 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originFire & EMSCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adds Fire Protection Engineer positions to a labor agreement with Professional and Technical Employees Local 17.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127478July 31, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to City employment; authorizing execution of a Memorandum of Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Professional and Technical Employees, Local 17; regarding the accretion of the Fire Protection Engineer classification series; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $225,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Opposes two 2026 ballot initiatives concerning parental rights and participation in K–12 athletics.Res 32218 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originYouth & EducationElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Opposes two 2026 ballot initiatives concerning parental rights and participation in K–12 athletics.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 15, 2026
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution expressing opposition to the passage of Initiative Measure No. IL26-001, concerning parental rights relating to their children in public school, and Initiative Measure No. IL26-638, concerning participation in athletics at K-12 schools, on the November 3, 2026, General Election Ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Commits Seattle to an evidence-based gun-violence reduction strategy developed with national experts.Res 32217 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Commits Seattle to an evidence-based gun-violence reduction strategy developed with national experts.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 17, 2026
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution declaring the Seattle City Council’s intent for the City of Seattle to implement an evidence-based, comprehensive gun violence reduction strategy, that includes partnering with national experts who have helped other cities significantly reduce gun violence, such as the National Network for Safe Communities (NNSC) at John Jay College.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $418,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
Expands the Capitol Hill Business Improvement Area and revises its assessment structure.CB 121272 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expands the Capitol Hill Business Improvement Area and revises its assessment structure.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127506September 21, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the Capitol Hill Business Improvement Area; modifying the boundaries; amending Ordinance 113029, as previously amended by Ordinances 115998, 120303, and 124514; modifying the assessment structure for the Capitol Hill Business Improvement Area; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appoints members to Seattle’s Transportation Funding Task Force.Res 32215 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Appoints members to Seattle’s Transportation Funding Task Force.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 21, 2026
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution appointing the members of the Transportation Funding Task Force.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizes Denny Blaine Park’s historic importance to Seattle’s LGBTQ+ community and supports heritage preservation.Res 32219 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Recognizes Denny Blaine Park’s historic importance to Seattle’s LGBTQ+ community and supports heritage preservation.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 24, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing Denny Blaine Park as a site of historic significance to Seattle’s LGBTQ+ community and supporting efforts to preserve and interpret its cultural heritage.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan through the city’s 2026 annual amendment process.CB 121268 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan through the city’s 2026 annual amendment process.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127514September 24, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsEddie Lin
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to land use and zoning; amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2026 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Changes civil-service coverage, job titles, and salaries for selected City positions.CB 120925 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changes civil-service coverage, job titles, and salaries for selected City positions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127174January 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Fourth Quarter 2024 Employment Ordinance; exempting positions from the Civil Service System; returning positions to the Civil Service System; retitling existing titles; establishing new titles; and adjusting salaries for existing titles; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $94,624. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Renews a private pipeline permit beneath streets near Harbor Island for twenty years.CB 120846 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renews a private pipeline permit beneath streets near Harbor Island for twenty years.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127176January 30, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Triton West LLC permission to maintain and operate a pipeline system in, under, along, and across 13th Avenue Southwest and Southwest Florida Street, for a twenty-year term; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 123990; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $20,810. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Conceptually approves a private pedestrian tunnel beneath Boren Avenue North.Res 32158 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conceptually approves a private pedestrian tunnel beneath Boren Avenue North.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 30, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to install, maintain, and operate a below-grade pedestrian tunnel under and across Boren Avenue North, north of Denny Way; as proposed by Onni Boren Ave Seattle LLC, as part of the construction of 121 Boren Avenue North, in the South Lake Union neighborhood.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Conceptually approves a private thermal-energy exchange system beneath Boren Avenue North.Res 32159 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricityNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conceptually approves a private thermal-energy exchange system beneath Boren Avenue North.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 30, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricityNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to install, maintain, and operate a below-grade private thermal energy exchange system under and across Boren Avenue North, north of Denny Way; as proposed by Onni Boren Ave Seattle LLC, as part of the construction of 121 Boren Avenue North, in the South Lake Union neighborhood.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation (SDOT). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts City Light’s updated investment plan for transportation electrification infrastructure.Res 32160 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts City Light’s updated investment plan for transportation electrification infrastructure.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 30, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; adopting an updated Transportation Electrification Strategic Investment Plan for the City Light Department that will guide the development of the utility’s infrastructure strategy and investment priorities related to the electrification of transportation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle City Council’s monthly presidents pro tem for 2025.Res 32161 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates Seattle City Council’s monthly presidents pro tem for 2025.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 6, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2025; superseding Resolution 32123.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the structure, membership, schedules, and duties of City Council committees.Res 32162 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates the structure, membership, schedules, and duties of City Council committees.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 6, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2025; and superseding Resolution 32124.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle’s 2025 participation on regional, state, and City committees.Res 32163 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates Seattle’s 2025 participation on regional, state, and City committees.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 6, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to participation, for 2025, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 32157.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Licenses Seattle Center Armory space for management and use by artists and arts organizations.CB 120939 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Licenses Seattle Center Armory space for management and use by artists and arts organizations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127184February 20, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; authorizing execution of a license agreement with Theatre Puget Sound to manage and operate space in the Seattle Center Armory for use by non-profit arts organizations and individual artists.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $230,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests a joint report on using rental registration for proactive eviction prevention.SLI SDCI-003S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a joint report on using rental registration for proactive eviction prevention.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsCathy Moore
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDCI, in consultation with HSD, report on utilization of RRIO for proactive eviction prevention

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Requests quarterly vacancy reports for City-funded rental housing projects.SLI OH-005S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests quarterly vacancy reports for City-funded rental housing projects.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest OH to provide quarterly vacancy data reports on city-funded rental housing projects

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests joint recommendations for distributing rental assistance to households at greatest housing risk.SLI HSD-040S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness ServicesTenant Protections Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests joint recommendations for distributing rental assistance to households at greatest housing risk.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness ServicesTenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD and SDCI report on how best to distribute rental assistance to ensure maximum distribution to households at risk of homelessness or eviction or currently homeless or in eviction proceedings

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a joint report on the City’s use of Good Neighbor Agreements.SLI HSD-007S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a joint report on the City’s use of Good Neighbor Agreements.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle, Sara Nelson
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD and OH provide a report on Good Neighbor Agreements

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Requests an inventory and assessment of business outreach and assistance across City departments.SLI OED-006S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests an inventory and assessment of business outreach and assistance across City departments.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED report on an inventory and assessment of all business outreach and technical assistance the City provides across departments

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Requests a workgroup exploring sustainable financing and operating models for Seattle Channel.SLI ITD-002S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a workgroup exploring sustainable financing and operating models for Seattle Channel.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Executive collaborate with the City Council to establish an advisory workgroup to explore alternative financing and operating models for the Seattle Channel to ensure its long-term sustainability

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Authorizes City departments to accept specified federal grants and passthrough funding in 2025.CB 120955 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes City departments to accept specified federal grants and passthrough funding in 2025.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127193March 27, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to federal funding; authorizing department directors to accept certain grants and passthrough funding in 2025; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirms support for first responders, diversified public safety, and completing police reforms.Res 32167 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPoliceFire & EMS Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Affirms support for first responders, diversified public safety, and completing police reforms.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 3, 2025
Official sponsorsRob Saka, Robert Kettle
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceFire & EMS
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION acknowledging that Seattle residents, workers, students, and visitors deserve to be safe and feel safe; recognizing and appreciating first responders from the Seattle Police Department, Seattle Fire Department, and the Community Assisted Response and Engagement Department; affirming the City’s obligations to fully support, train, and equip first responders; committing to a diversified public safety response system; acknowledging the City’s actions to reform the Police Department under the federal Consent Decree; committing to resolve the remaining issues of the Consent Decree; and affirming the essential services provided by the Police Department.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies a spending condition on Seattle Transportation funding in the 2025 budget.CB 120972 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Modifies a spending condition on Seattle Transportation funding in the 2025 budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127215May 16, 2025
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Seattle Department of Transportation; modifying a proviso; and amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Begins formal renewal proceedings for WaveDivision’s cable television franchise.Res 32171 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Begins formal renewal proceedings for WaveDivision’s cable television franchise.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 6, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION authorizing commencement of cable franchise contract renewal proceedings in accordance with the provisions of 47 U.S.C. Section 546 and written request from WaveDivision I, LLC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle IT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves updated surveillance reports and uses for police tracking devices.CB 120994 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves updated surveillance reports and uses for police tracking devices.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127236June 23, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2025 updated surveillance impact report and 2025 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Tracking Devices; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $250,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes two interlocal agreements implementing regional Chinook salmon conservation plans.CB 121002 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & Habitat Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes two interlocal agreements implementing regional Chinook salmon conservation plans.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127244July 8, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into two interlocal agreements to provide for the implementation of Chinook salmon conservation plans for the Lake Washington, Cedar River, Sammamish Watershed and the Green River, Duwamish River, and Central Puget Sound Watershed; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $216,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a deed of trust protecting Cultural Space Agency’s leasehold rights.CB 120989 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a deed of trust protecting Cultural Space Agency’s leasehold rights.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127247July 10, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation; authorizing the Director of Transportation to execute and record a Leasehold Deed of Trust reflecting Cultural Space Agency’s leasehold estate rights created through the agreement it executed with the City of Seattle as authorized under Ordinance 126916; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $485,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle’s agreement with Sound Transit for the approved Link light-rail alignment.CB 121003 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle’s agreement with Sound Transit for the approved Link light-rail alignment.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127251July 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit); authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an amendment to the "Agreement between the City of Seattle and Sound Transit for Grant of Non-Exclusive Use of a Light Rail Transit Way as related to the Link Light Rail Transit Project" to reflect the approved alignment and light rail transit facilities for the Link Light Rail Transit Project, including addition of the West Seattle Link Extension; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOWCPST. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves Sound Transit light-rail alignments, station locations, and a maintenance base.Res 32172 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves Sound Transit light-rail alignments, station locations, and a maintenance base.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the alignment, station locations, and maintenance base location for Sound Transit’s Link light rail lines in The City of Seattle, including the West Seattle Link Extension; and superseding the alignment, station locations, and maintenance base location approved in Resolution 31784.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOWCPST. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes City Light’s interlocal agreement with the Kalispel Tribe.CB 121025 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes City Light’s interlocal agreement with the Kalispel Tribe.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127256July 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the Kalispel Tribe of Indians.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts updated rules and procedures for the Seattle City Council.Res 32173 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts updated rules and procedures for the Seattle City Council.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 31, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; superseding Resolution 32096.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates Seattle City Council’s monthly presidents pro tem for 2025.Res 32177 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Designates Seattle City Council’s monthly presidents pro tem for 2025.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 7, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2025; superseding Resolution 32161.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle’s 2025 participation on regional, state, and City committees.Res 32178 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates Seattle’s 2025 participation on regional, state, and City committees.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 7, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to participation, for 2025, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 32163.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Acquires right-of-way for the Northeast 130th and 125th Street safety project.CB 121016 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acquires right-of-way for the Northeast 130th and 125th Street safety project.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127272August 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the NE 130th Street and NE 125th Street Mobility and Safety project; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (“SDOT”) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a Deed for Street Purposes from Judith Strader Enriquez, situated in Tract 60, Country Home Plat, Division 1; placing the real property rights and interest conveyed by such deed under the jurisdiction of SDOT; laying off the deed as right-of-way; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts multiple deeds establishing or expanding public streets and alleys.CB 121017 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts multiple deeds establishing or expanding public streets and alleys.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127273August 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for alley or street purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the alley in Block 2, University Lake Shore Park; the alley in Block 47, Central Seattle; the alley in Blocks 33 and 34, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake Circle; the alley in Blocks 5 and 8, University Heights; 32nd Avenue Northeast abutting Blocks 6 and 7, Seattle Suburban Home Tracts; the alley in Block 135, A. A. Denny’s Broadway Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 2, West Seattle Land and Improvement Co’s Fourth Plat; the alley in Block 29, Capitol Hill Addition to the City of Seattle, (Division No. 4); the alley in Block 18, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 1, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 1, Shelton’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in a portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; Brooklyn Avenue Northeast abutting Assessor’s Plat of University Heights; Brooklyn Avenue Northeast abutting Block 8, University Heights; South Director Street abutting Tract 13, Excelsior Acre Tracts; South Holgate Street abutting Block 45, Central Seattle; the alley in Block 87, D. T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 27, Addition to the City of Seattle, as laid off by D. T. Denny, Guardian of the Estate of J. H. Nagle (Commonly known as Nagle’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 10, Cowen’s University Park; the alley in Block 17, Licton Springs Park; 38th Avenue South and South Holly Street abutting Block 6, Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle, Division Number 6; the alley in Block 6, Highland View; the alley in Block 32, South Park; and 23rd Avenue Southwest abutting Block 42, Homecroft.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts multiple deeds establishing or expanding public streets and alleys.CB 121021 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts multiple deeds establishing or expanding public streets and alleys.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127277August 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the alley in Block 35, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell, (deceased) (commonly known as Heirs of Sara A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 2, West Seattle Land and Improvement Co’s Fourth Plat; Dayton Avenue North abutting Block 6, Osner’s Suburban Homes; the alley in Block "A", Third Addition to that part of the City of Seattle heretofore laid off by A. A. Denny & William N. Bell (commonly known as William N. Bell’s 3rd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 15, Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block W, Bell’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 8, Kaufman’s Addition to Green Lake Circle; the alley in Blocks 4, 23, 32, and 33, South Park; the alley in Blocks 27, 105, and 118, Gilman Park; the alley in Block 50, Sea View Park; the alley in Block 55, Boston Co’s Plat of West Seattle; the alley in Parcels B and C, Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3039574-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20221018900007 (previously known as Block 2, Marion Highlands); South Holgate Street abutting Block 34, Central Seattle; the alley in Block 34, Central Seattle; 6th Avenue Northwest abutting Block 4, Ross Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 30, Gilman’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 25, Hill Tract Addition to the City of Seattle; South State Street abutting Block 23, Sander’s Supplemental Plat; the alley in Block 21, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Expands young-adult participation and stipend eligibility on SPU’s customer review panel.Res 32175 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expands young-adult participation and stipend eligibility on SPU’s customer review panel.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Public Utilities (SPU); amending Resolution 31800, as later amended by Resolution 31825; and updating the ongoing Customer Review Panel to provide additional opportunities for young adult engagement and clarify panel eligibility for optional stipends, as SPU implements the six-year Strategic Business Plan (Plan) and conducts future Plan updates.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,600. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves City Light’s 2026–2029 Clean Energy Implementation Plan.Res 32181 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves City Light’s 2026–2029 Clean Energy Implementation Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; approving the City Light Department’s 2026-2029 Clean Energy Implementation Plan as required by Washington State’s Clean Energy Transformation Act (CETA), chapter 19.405 RCW.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Changes management and advisory-board rules for the University District business improvement area.CB 121076 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changes management and advisory-board rules for the University District business improvement area.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127307September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the University District Parking and Business Improvement Area; modifying the process for selecting a program manager; modifying the requirements governing the composition of the BIA Advisory Board; and amending Ordinance 126093.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedEconomic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renames a transportation capital project and removes a related budget restriction.CB 121058 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Renames a transportation capital project and removes a related budget restriction.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127315September 26, 2025
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation; amending Ordinance 127156, which adopted the 2025 Budget, including the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); renaming the Council District Fund CIP project to the District Project Fund CIP project; and lifting a proviso.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a 2025 memorandum for City construction-equipment operators.CB 121097 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a 2025 memorandum for City construction-equipment operators.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127333November 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77, Construction Maintenance Equipment Operator (CMEO) Unit for the period effective from January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates fund and financial policies for automated traffic-safety cameras.CB 121100 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTraffic Safety Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates fund and financial policies for automated traffic-safety cameras.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127341November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to automated traffic safety cameras; updating financial and fund policies related to the use of cameras and the name of the associated fund; and amending Ordinance 124230.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Makes technical updates to Seattle’s municipal water-system financing ordinance.CB 121091 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Makes technical updates to Seattle’s municipal water-system financing ordinance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127339November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; amending Ordinance 125714, as amended by Ordinance 126483, to incorporate the terms of certain contingent amendments thereto that were to become effective upon the occurrence of certain events that have since occurred, to delete certain provisions rendered inoperative by the amendments, and to make certain other technical amendments; and ratifying and confirming the amendments and certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance / SPU. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Closes obsolete City funds, transfers remaining balances, and retires an unused loan authorization.CB 121102 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Closes obsolete City funds, transfers remaining balances, and retires an unused loan authorization.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127343November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City financial management; closing certain funds and authorizing the Office of City Finance to take action pursuant to those closures; authorizing the transfer of all unexpended and unencumbered balances and other assets and liabilities of those funds; abandoning appropriation authority from those funds; retiring an obsolete interfund loan authorization; and repealing Ordinance 124892.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $299,702. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of City Finance. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Sets Council’s retirement-system funding intent using the latest actuarial study.Res 32184 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sets Council’s retirement-system funding intent using the latest actuarial study.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31334; establishing the City Council’s intent to fund the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System as informed by the January 1, 2025 Actuarial Study.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Approves the retirement system’s interest rates for calendar year 2026.Res 32185 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the retirement system’s interest rates for calendar year 2026.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2026.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Adopts Seattle’s 2026 budget, capital program, and related position changes.CB 121116 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Seattle’s 2026 budget, capital program, and related position changes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127362November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2026; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Specifies how Seattle may use revenue from its short-term-rental tax.CB 121110 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Specifies how Seattle may use revenue from its short-term-rental tax.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127359November 24, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to short-term rental tax revenue; amending Ordinance 125872 to specify use of revenue proceeds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed1 not voting
Expands transportation-benefit-district revenue uses to include transit security programs.CB 121124 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Expands transportation-benefit-district revenue uses to include transit security programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127361November 24, 2025
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Transportation Benefit District; authorizing material scope changes to City of Seattle Proposition 1 to expand uses of revenues for transit security.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Expands transportation-benefit-district revenue uses to include passenger transportation services.CB 121123 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Expands transportation-benefit-district revenue uses to include passenger transportation services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127357November 24, 2025
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Transportation Benefit District; authorizing material scope changes to City of Seattle Proposition 1 to expand uses of revenues for passenger transportation services.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Creates a fund for Central District and Southeast Seattle preservation and revitalization proceeds.CB 121122 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates a fund for Central District and Southeast Seattle preservation and revitalization proceeds.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127356November 24, 2025
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City finances; creating a fund for depositing General Fund proceeds related to preservation and revitalization of Seattle’s Central District and Southeast Seattle community.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Adjusts 2026 pay ranges for the City’s discretionary-pay positions.CB 121131 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originZoningCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts 2026 pay ranges for the City’s discretionary-pay positions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127367December 11, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Pay Zone Ordinance; adjusting the pay zone structures for 2026 for the City’s discretionary pay programs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Adopts Seattle’s state legislative agenda and advocacy priorities for 2026.Res 32187 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts Seattle’s state legislative agenda and advocacy priorities for 2026.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 11, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2026 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Changes assessment rates and exemptions for the SODO business improvement area.CB 121073 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Changes assessment rates and exemptions for the SODO business improvement area.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127372December 22, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the SODO Parking and Business Improvement Area; changing the assessment rate and exemptions; and amending Ordinance 125678, as previously amended by Ordinance 126191.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a Deferred Compensation Analyst job series and sets its pay rates.CB 121142 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a Deferred Compensation Analyst job series and sets its pay rates.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127374December 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; and establishing the Deferred Compensation Analyst classification title series and corresponding rates of pay in the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to acquire a Northeast Seattle parcel for utility purposes.CB 121138 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to acquire a Northeast Seattle parcel for utility purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127378December 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to acquire by negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation) a parcel of land in Seattle, for utility purposes identified as King County Parcel Number 152504-9010 located at 4000 NE 41st St. and to execute, accept, and record deeds, conveyance documents, and agreements deemed by the General Manager/CEO to be necessary to this transaction on behalf of the City; placing the real property under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing payment of all other costs associated with the acquisition; amending Ordinance 127362, which adopted the 2026 Budget including the 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $64,260,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets City Council committee structure, membership, schedules, and duties for 2024–2025.Res 32124 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets City Council committee structure, membership, schedules, and duties for 2024–2025.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 5, 2024
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2024 and 2025; and superseding Resolution 32037.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates monthly City Council presidents pro tem for 2024–2025.Res 32123 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Designates monthly City Council presidents pro tem for 2024–2025.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 5, 2024
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2024-2025; superseding Resolution 32036.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Assigns councilmembers to regional, state, county, and City committees for 2024–2025.Res 32125 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Assigns councilmembers to regional, state, county, and City committees for 2024–2025.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 11, 2024
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to participation, for 2024 and 2025, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 32038.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises councilmember assignments to regional, state, county, and City committees.Res 32127 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Revises councilmember assignments to regional, state, county, and City committees.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 29, 2024
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to participation, for 2024 and 2025, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 32125.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests quarterly police reports on staffing, overtime, finances, and performance.SLI SPD-801S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests quarterly police reports on staffing, overtime, finances, and performance.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD provide quarterly reports on staffing, overtime, finances, and performance metrics

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Requests a joint plan to monitor and evaluate trees on private property.SLI OPCD-002S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a joint plan to monitor and evaluate trees on private property.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OPCD and SDCI develop a monitoring and evaluation plan for trees on private property

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests quarterly performance reports on the City's unsanctioned-encampment response.SLI MO-002S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests quarterly performance reports on the City's unsanctioned-encampment response.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the MO provide quarterly reports regarding activities and performance of the Unified Care Team (UCT), or its successor, and any other collaborating departments that manage the City's response to unsanctioned encampments.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests options for adding employee gender identities to the City's HR system.SLI SDHR-800S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests options for adding employee gender identities to the City's HR system.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDHR and CFD report on adding employee gender identity options in the City’s Workday Human Resources system

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Requests recommendations for tracking and reporting non-utility General Fund grants.SLI HSD-804S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests recommendations for tracking and reporting non-utility General Fund grants.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO and FAS provide recommendations for tracking and reporting on non-utility grant expenditures made from the GF

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Approves Seattle Police use of the Callyo surveillance technology.CB 120753 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves Seattle Police use of the Callyo surveillance technology.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127012April 19, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2023 surveillance impact report and 2023 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department's use of Callyo.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves Seattle Police use of Hostage Negotiation Throw Phone technology.CB 120754 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves Seattle Police use of Hostage Negotiation Throw Phone technology.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127013April 19, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2023 surveillance impact report and 2023 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department's use of Hostage Negotiation Throw Phone.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a five-year budget framework for the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission.Res 32133 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a five-year budget framework for the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 19, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the proposed budget framework of the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission for Canada fiscal years 2024-2025 through 2028-2029.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $199,961. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light Andrew Strong Greg Shiring. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Changes which City positions are included in the civil service system.CB 120763 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changes which City positions are included in the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127014April 26, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the First Quarter 2024 Employment Ordinance; exempting positions from the civil service system; and returning positions to the civil service system; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $54,577. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle Transportation Plan as the City's consolidated transportation plan.Res 32131 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitStreets & SidewalksTraffic Safety Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Seattle Transportation Plan as the City's consolidated transportation plan.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitStreets & SidewalksTraffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the Seattle Transportation Plan and superseding the Transit, Bicycle, Freight, and Pedestrian Master Plans.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Seattle Parks and Recreation's 2024 Parks Development Plan.Res 32135 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Seattle Parks and Recreation's 2024 Parks Development Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 8, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle Parks and Recreation 2024 Parks Development Plan; authorizing the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation to submit the plan to the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office; and superseding the 2017 Parks Development Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renews Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center's permit for an Eastlake Avenue skybridge.CB 120764 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renews Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center's permit for an Eastlake Avenue skybridge.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127020May 16, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center permission to continue maintaining and operating an existing skybridge over and across Eastlake Avenue East, north of Aloha Street; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 124240; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $73,744. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renews Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center's permit for an Eastlake Avenue service tunnel.CB 120765 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renews Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center's permit for an Eastlake Avenue service tunnel.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127021May 16, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center permission to continue maintaining and operating an existing service tunnel under and across Eastlake Avenue East, north of Aloha Street; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 123918; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $10,997. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes acquisition or condemnation of seven South Seattle parcels for utility purposes.CB 120780 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes acquisition or condemnation of seven South Seattle parcels for utility purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127022May 16, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the acquisition of real property by negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation) of seven separate parcels of land (“Properties”) or eminent domain (condemnation) of leases identified as King County Parcel Number 7327903645 located at 7760 8th Avenue South, King County Parcel Number 7327902490 located at 803 South Chicago Street, King County Parcel Number 7327902480 located at 811 South Chicago Street, King County Parcel Number 7327902520 located at 7814 8th Avenue South, King County Parcel Number 7327902500 located at 7808 8th Avenue South, King County Parcel Number 7327902510 located at 836 South Kenyon Street, and King County Parcel Number 7327902395 located at 850 South Kenyon Street; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to execute all documents and take other necessary actions to complete the Properties’ acquisition, including acceptance and recording of the deeds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $12,580,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves Seattle Police use of automated license plate reader technology.CB 120778 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves Seattle Police use of automated license plate reader technology.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127044June 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2023 updated surveillance impact report and 2023 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Automated License Plate Reader technology.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $280,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a lease for the Human Services Department's Aging and Disability Services Division.CB 120792 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a lease for the Human Services Department's Aging and Disability Services Division.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127046June 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to negotiate and execute a real property lease with Neptune III TT, LLC, on behalf of the Human Services Department for its Aging and Disability Services Division; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $368,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts 2024–2026 Seattle Housing Levy plans, funding policies, and administrative authority.CB 120804 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts 2024–2026 Seattle Housing Levy plans, funding policies, and administrative authority.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127051July 9, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsCathy Moore
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to housing for low-income households; adopting the 2023 Seattle Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2024-2026; adopting Housing Funding Policies for the 2023 Seattle Housing Levy and other fund sources; authorizing actions by the Director of Housing regarding past and future housing loans and contracts; creating two funds for Housing Levy revenues; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOH/ City Council. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves City Light's 2024 Integrated Resource Plan progress report.Res 32138 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves City Light's 2024 Integrated Resource Plan progress report.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 16, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving the 2024 Integrated Resource Plan Progress Report as conforming with the public policy objectives of the City of Seattle and the requirements of the State of Washington; and approving the Progress Report for the biennium September 2024 through August 2026.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts transportation grants and adjusts 2024 Seattle Department of Transportation appropriations.CB 120826 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts transportation grants and adjusts 2024 Seattle Department of Transportation appropriations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127070August 16, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of Transportation to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126955, which adopted the 2024 Budget; changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation and various Budget Control Levels, and from various funds in the Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $802,278. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts City Light's policy for managing wholesale energy and environmental-credit trading risks.Res 32130 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originClimateElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts City Light's policy for managing wholesale energy and environmental-credit trading risks.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ClimateElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; endorsing City Light’s Wholesale Energy Risk Management Policy (“WERM Policy”), which governs wholesale energy, transmission, and ancillary services trading, including renewable energy credits and greenhouse gas offsets; establishing the WERM Policy as the guiding policy for managing risks related to wholesale energy, ancillary services, renewable energy credits, and greenhouse gas offsets within the City Light Department; and superseding Resolution 31616.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Seattle Public Utilities' 2025–2030 strategic plan and associated rate path.Res 32136 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Seattle Public Utilities' 2025–2030 strategic plan and associated rate path.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Public Utilities; adopting a 2025-2030 Strategic Business Plan for Seattle Public Utilities; and endorsing a three-year (2025-2027) rate path and a subsequent, three-year (2028-2030) rate forecast to support the Strategic Business Plan Update.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts City Light's 2025–2030 strategic plan and six-year rate path.Res 32139 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts City Light's 2025–2030 strategic plan and six-year rate path.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the City Light Department, adopting a 2025-2030 Strategic Plan Update for the City Light Department and endorsing the associated six-year rate path.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes state harbor leases for the Leschi public and private moorages.CB 120837 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes state harbor leases for the Leschi public and private moorages.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127074September 5, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the execution of the required harbor leases with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for the North and South Leschi Moorages and the Leschi South Public Moorage; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the 2024 Food Action Plan and directs coordinated implementation and monitoring.Res 32144 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the 2024 Food Action Plan and directs coordinated implementation and monitoring.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the 2024 Food Action Plan and directing the Office of Sustainability and Environment to continue interdepartmental coordination, implementation, and monitoring of the Food Action Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Sustainability & Environment (OSE). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves Seattle's participation in Washington's Clean Fuels Standard program.Res 32146 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originClimateCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves Seattle's participation in Washington's Clean Fuels Standard program.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ClimateCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City’s participation in the State of Washington’s Clean Fuels Standard Program (“Program”) promulgated under Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 70A.535.005; acknowledging and approving the City’s participation in the Program; and acknowledging the Interdepartmental Memorandum of Agreement Regarding City of Seattle Administration of Washington State Clean Fuel Standard Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes acquisition or condemnation of two North Seattle parcels for utility purposes.CB 120855 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes acquisition or condemnation of two North Seattle parcels for utility purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127094September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to acquire by negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation) two separate parcels of land in Seattle, for utility purposes identified as King County Parcel Number 270560-0010 located at 9740 8th Ave NW and King County Parcel Number 270560-0007 located at 711 NW 100th St. and to execute, accept, and record deeds, conveyance documents and agreements deemed by the General Manager/CEO to be necessary to these transaction on behalf of the City; placing the real properties under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing payment of all other costs associated with the acquisition; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $9,100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amends Seattle Center's lease for property at 621 Second Avenue North.CB 120860 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amends Seattle Center's lease for property at 621 Second Avenue North.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127095September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute a Third Amendment to the Lease Agreement with Tilden Investments LLC for certain real property adjacent to Seattle Center at 621 Second Avenue North, Seattle, Washington.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $641,351. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Places Social Housing Initiative 137 and the Council's alternative on the February 2025 ballot.Res 32148 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originAffordable HousingCompensation & BenefitsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Places Social Housing Initiative 137 and the Council's alternative on the February 2025 ballot.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 1, 2024
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingCompensation & BenefitsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding Initiative 137 concerning excess compensation payroll taxes to fund the Social Housing Developer (which the City Council determined not to enact on September 19, 2024); authorizing the City Clerk and the Executive Director of the Ethics and Elections Commission to take those actions necessary to enable proposed Initiative 137 to appear on the February 11, 2025 ballot and the local voters’ pamphlet in conjunction with the Payroll Expense Tax proposal (City Council Bill 120864), which is a proposed alternative measure dealing with the same subject matter in accordance with Charter Article IV; requesting the King County Elections Director to place the proposed Initiative 137 and its alternate on the February 11, 2025 election ballot in accordance with applicable law; and providing for the publication of such proposed Initiative Measure and its alternate.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Changes the boundaries of the West Seattle Junction business improvement area.CB 120831 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changes the boundaries of the West Seattle Junction business improvement area.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127103October 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the West Seattle Junction Parking and Business Improvement Area; modifying the boundaries; and amending Ordinance 113326, as previously amended by Ordinances 119539, 120570, 121758, 124528, and 125152.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $490,323. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedEconomic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renames part of 2nd Avenue North as Sue Bird Court North.CB 120857 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renames part of 2nd Avenue North as Sue Bird Court North.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127104October 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City streets; changing the name of a designated portion of 2nd Ave N, generally located between Lenny Wilkens Way and Denny Way, to Sue Bird Court N; superseding the relevant portions of Ordinance 4044, Ordinance 89910, Ordinance 102981, and any other ordinance to the extent inconsistent; and ratifying and confirming certain acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amends the City–County agreement establishing the King County Regional Homelessness Authority.CB 120858 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amends the City–County agreement establishing the King County Regional Homelessness Authority.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127105October 3, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsCathy Moore
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to homelessness; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to execute an amendment of the interlocal agreement between The City of Seattle and King County establishing the King County Regional Homelessness Authority.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Reviews and adopts Seattle City Light's wildfire mitigation plan.Res 32147 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Reviews and adopts Seattle City Light's wildfire mitigation plan.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 11, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTanya Woo
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; recording review of and adopting the City Light Department’s wildfire mitigation plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $814,089. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Approves Seattle Police use of real-time crime center software.CB 120845 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves Seattle Police use of real-time crime center software.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127111October 11, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; and authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2024 surveillance impact report and 2024 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Real-Time Crime Center software.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Approves a labor memorandum with Professional and Technical Employees Local 17.CB 120868 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a labor memorandum with Professional and Technical Employees Local 17.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127118October 31, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Professional and Technical Employees, Local 17; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
States City opposition to Washington Initiative 2117 on carbon-credit trading.Res 32149 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & DebtElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

States City opposition to Washington Initiative 2117 on carbon-credit trading.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 1, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 1 abstained
Taxes, Revenue & DebtElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the Mayor and City Council’s opposition to Washington State ballot Initiative 2117 concerning carbon tax credit trading.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 1 abstained
Sets the Council's intent for funding the City employee retirement system.Res 32150 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sets the Council's intent for funding the City employee retirement system.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31334; establishing the City Council’s intent to fund the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System as informed by the January 1, 2024 Actuarial Study.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves 2025 interest rates for the City employee retirement system.Res 32151 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves 2025 interest rates for the City employee retirement system.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2025.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Seattle Center's facility fee ranges and terms.CB 120873 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Seattle Center's facility fee ranges and terms.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127124November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to facilities at Seattle Center; adopting the Seattle Center Fee Range Schedule and Terms and Conditions from which the Seattle Center Director is authorized to set fees for use of Seattle Center facilities and property; and superseding previous Seattle Center fee schedules and terms and conditions.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $75,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends flexibility in spending Seattle transportation-network-company tax proceeds.Res 32152 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Extends flexibility in spending Seattle transportation-network-company tax proceeds.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the spending plan for the proceeds of the Seattle transportation network company tax; amending Resolution 31914 to continue providing temporary flexibility on the use of tax proceeds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expands allowable uses of Seattle Transportation Benefit District revenues.CB 120887 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expands allowable uses of Seattle Transportation Benefit District revenues.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127138November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Transportation Benefit District; authorizing material scope changes to City of Seattle Proposition 1 to expand uses of revenues.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Seattle's 2025 operating and capital budget and position changes.CB 120905 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Seattle's 2025 operating and capital budget and position changes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127156November 27, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2025; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Commits to ongoing Seattle Channel funding and requests an executive funding plan.CB 120911 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Commits to ongoing Seattle Channel funding and requests an executive funding plan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127157November 27, 2024
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Channel; stating the City Council’s intent to establish dedicated and ongoing funding sources for the operating and capital costs of the Seattle Channel; and requesting that the Executive submit a funding plan by September 3, 2025.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revises councilmember assignments to regional, state, county, and City committees.Res 32157 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Revises councilmember assignments to regional, state, county, and City committees.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 11, 2024
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to participation, for 2024 and 2025, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 32127.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Adopts the City of Seattle's 2025 state legislative agenda.Res 32155 · Resolution (Res) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts the City of Seattle's 2025 state legislative agenda.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 11, 2024
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2025 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Raises pay for specified nonrepresented City jobs in 2025 and 2026.CB 120919 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Raises pay for specified nonrepresented City jobs in 2025 and 2026.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127161December 13, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; providing wage increases for 2025 and 2026 for certain non-represented City job titles; and providing adjustments to certain non-represented job titles.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts pay zones for the City's discretionary-pay programs.CB 120920 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originZoningCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts pay zones for the City's discretionary-pay programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127162December 13, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Pay Zone Ordinance; adjusting the pay zones for titles in the City’s discretionary pay programs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to convey an easement to the City of Shoreline.CB 120430 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to convey an easement to the City of Shoreline.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126742January 9, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to convey an easement to the City of Shoreline; and accepting the payment of fair market value for the easement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes The City of Seattle, through Seattle Parks and Recreation, to enter into an agreement with the Arboretum Foundation for support of….CB 120489 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes The City of Seattle, through Seattle Parks and Recreation, to enter into an agreement with the Arboretum Foundation for support of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126750January 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing The City of Seattle, through Seattle Parks and Recreation, to enter into an agreement with the Arboretum Foundation for support of the Seattle Japanese Garden consistent with the Non-Government Agreement in Attachment 1 to this ordinance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $3,600. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to delegate certain Central Waterfront maintenance, operations, and management to the Seattle Center Department.CB 120492 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to delegate certain Central Waterfront maintenance, operations, and management to the Seattle Center Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126755January 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the maintenance and operations for the Waterfront Park and Public Spaces; authorizing the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to delegate certain Central Waterfront maintenance, operations, and management to the Seattle Center Department; delegating authority to the Seattle Center Director to enforce Waterfront Park and Public Spaces Rules; and authorizing an extension of the existing Pilot Agreement with Friends of Waterfront Seattle.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of the Waterfront and Civic Projects (OWCP). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Dunn Lumber Company permission to construct, maintain, and operate a private communication conduit under and across Latona Avenue Northeast, north of….CB 120506 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Dunn Lumber Company permission to construct, maintain, and operate a private communication conduit under and across Latona Avenue Northeast, north of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126764February 16, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Dunn Lumber Company permission to construct, maintain, and operate a private communication conduit under and across Latona Avenue Northeast, north of Northeast Northlake Way, for a 15-year term, renewable for one successive 15-year term; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $3,375. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate a transformer and retaining wall at 63rd Avenue Southwest, intersecting with Beach Drive Southwest….Res 32079 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate a transformer and retaining wall at 63rd Avenue Southwest, intersecting with Beach Drive Southwest….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 16, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate a transformer and retaining wall at 63rd Avenue Southwest, intersecting with Beach Drive Southwest and Southwest Spokane Street, to support the operation of the Alki Wet Weather Treatment Station Facility and 63rd Avenue Pump Station Facility in the West Seattle neighborhood, as proposed by King County.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating the name of a new street constructed as part of the Central Waterfront project, connecting Alaskan Way with Elliott and Western….CB 120507 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating the name of a new street constructed as part of the Central Waterfront project, connecting Alaskan Way with Elliott and Western….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126766February 22, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City streets; designating the name of a new street constructed as part of the Central Waterfront project, connecting Alaskan Way with Elliott and Western Avenues, between Pike and Bell Streets, as “Elliott Way”; truncating use of the Elliott Avenue name at Western Avenue; superseding prior ordinances to the extent inconsistent; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2023 Work Program.Res 32086 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts the Seattle City Council 2023 Work Program.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 28, 2023
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2023 Work Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2023 calendar year.Res 32083 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2023 calendar year.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2023 calendar year.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Edin Sisic Caleb Wagenaar. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes execution of a Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel Transfer and Conveyance Agreement on behalf of The City of Seattle with the Central….CB 120522 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of a Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel Transfer and Conveyance Agreement on behalf of The City of Seattle with the Central….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126784March 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel; authorizing execution of a Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel Transfer and Conveyance Agreement on behalf of The City of Seattle with the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (“Sound Transit”) and King County; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Request that SDOT collaborate with SCL to complete the street frontage improvements for the Thomas Street Redesigned (MC-TR-C105) CIP Project.SLI SDOT-307-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT collaborate with SCL to complete the street frontage improvements for the Thomas Street Redesigned (MC-TR-C105) CIP Project.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT collaborate with SCL to complete the street frontage improvements for the Thomas Street Redesigned (MC-TR-C105) CIP Project

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that SDOT and SPD provide an implementation plan for the expansion of the School Zone Camera program and make recommendations for….SLI SDOT-304-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPoliceZoningYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT and SPD provide an implementation plan for the expansion of the School Zone Camera program and make recommendations for….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Alex Pedersen
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
PoliceZoningYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT and SPD provide an implementation plan for the expansion of the School Zone Camera program and make recommendations for expansion of other camera programs authorized by State law

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Request that LAW provide quarterly reports on sexual assault cases in the Domestic Violence Unit.SLI LAW-601-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that LAW provide quarterly reports on sexual assault cases in the Domestic Violence Unit.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that LAW provide quarterly reports on sexual assault cases in the Domestic Violence Unit

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Request that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness.SLI HSD-301-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120499 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126771March 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Camera Systems - Images or Non-Auditory Video Recordings.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD Vinh Tang. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120500 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126772March 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Crash Data Retrieval Tools.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD Vinh Tang. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120501 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126773March 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Computer, Cellphone, & Mobile Device Extraction Tools.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD Vinh Tang. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120502 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126774March 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of GeoTime.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD Vinh Tang. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120503 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126775March 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Remotely Operated Vehicles.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD Vinh Tang. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120504 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126776March 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2022 surveillance impact report and 2022 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Tracking Devices.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD Vinh Tang. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the civil service system.CB 120517 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126780March 15, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the First Quarter 2023 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the civil service system; exempting positions from the civil service system; and establishing new titles and corresponding rates of pay; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2023 updated surveillance impact report and 2023 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use….CB 120518 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2023 updated surveillance impact report and 2023 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126785March 16, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2023 updated surveillance impact report and 2023 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Forward Looking Infrared Real-Time Video.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a Memorandum of Agreement with UW Medical Center-Northwest Campus regarding the establishment, composition, and rules for a Development Advisory Committee for….Res 32088 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a Memorandum of Agreement with UW Medical Center-Northwest Campus regarding the establishment, composition, and rules for a Development Advisory Committee for….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 24, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving a Memorandum of Agreement with UW Medical Center-Northwest Campus regarding the establishment, composition, and rules for a Development Advisory Committee for preparation of a Major Institution Master Plan for UW Medical Center-Northwest Campus.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Department to enter and participate in the Western Resource Adequacy Program, including the ability to execute additional agreements necessary or….CB 120532 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Department to enter and participate in the Western Resource Adequacy Program, including the ability to execute additional agreements necessary or….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126790March 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Department to enter and participate in the Western Resource Adequacy Program, including the ability to execute additional agreements necessary or convenient to participate in the Western Resource Adequacy Program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Seattle's 2022 Solid Waste Plan Update: Moving Upstream to Zero Waste.Res 32082 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid Waste Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Seattle's 2022 Solid Waste Plan Update: Moving Upstream to Zero Waste.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 20, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting Seattle's 2022 Solid Waste Plan Update: Moving Upstream to Zero Waste; revising the 2011 Revision: Picking Up The Pace Toward Zero Waste; and superseding certain requirements adopted by Resolution 30990.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (“SDOT”) to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle….CB 120528 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitStreets & SidewalksTrees & Habitat Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (“SDOT”) to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126795April 20, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitStreets & SidewalksTrees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Route 44 Transit-Plus Multimodal Corridor project; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (“SDOT”) to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle a Deed for Street Purposes from Adam Rogers, as a separate estate, situated in a portion of Block 12, Salmon Bay City, Malson’s Addition to Seattle; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by such deed under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; laying off the property as right-of-way; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and Local 242.CB 120553 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and Local 242.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126808May 9, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding between The City of Seattle and Local 242; establishing a new title and rate of pay; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $161,494. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property identified in King County Records as Parcel Number 766620-2390, commonly known as the Bakun Building, from….CB 120548 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property identified in King County Records as Parcel Number 766620-2390, commonly known as the Bakun Building, from….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126810May 12, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Finance and Administrative Services (FAS); authorizing the acquisition of real property identified in King County Records as Parcel Number 766620-2390, commonly known as the Bakun Building, from the Washington State Department of Transportation; authorizing acceptance and recording of deeds for general municipal purposes including, but not limited to, the acquisition of the Bakun Building property; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $13,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants SeaPort Midstream Partners, LLC permission to maintain and operate a pipeline system in, under, along, and across Southwest Florida Street, between….CB 120543 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants SeaPort Midstream Partners, LLC permission to maintain and operate a pipeline system in, under, along, and across Southwest Florida Street, between….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126815May 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting SeaPort Midstream Partners, LLC permission to maintain and operate a pipeline system in, under, along, and across Southwest Florida Street, between 13th Avenue Southwest and 16th Avenue Southwest, for a 30-year term, renewable for two successive 15-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,950. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Qwest Corporation permission to continue maintaining and operating an existing utility tunnel under and across Seneca Street, east of 3rd Avenue.CB 120544 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Qwest Corporation permission to continue maintaining and operating an existing utility tunnel under and across Seneca Street, east of 3rd Avenue.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126816May 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Qwest Corporation permission to continue maintaining and operating an existing utility tunnel under and across Seneca Street, east of 3rd Avenue; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 123615; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $23,924. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget.CB 120560 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126820May 19, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Human Services Department; amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHuman Services Department. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget.CB 120535 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126825June 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 126725, which adopted the 2023 Budget; changing appropriations for various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds; and creating positions; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $667,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Construction and Inspections. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a Catchment….CB 120557 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a Catchment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126832June 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Transportation’s Hazard Mitigation Program; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a Catchment Wall Easement from Paul Tan and Ly Ngoc Tan, a married couple, located in a portion of Lot 7, Block 35, Rainier Beach, and a Catchment Wall Easement from Gracie Lee Young, located in a portion of Lot 8, Block 35, Rainier Beach; for the purpose of extending the protection of the adjacent roadway of superficial surface erosion of the adjacent slopes along a portion of Rainier Avenue South; placing the real property rights under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department.CB 120576 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126834June 5, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City of Seattle accepting easements, each granting to The City of Seattle an easement for overhead or underground electrical distribution rights upon, under and across real property in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department.CB 120577 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126833June 5, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City of Seattle accepting easements for overhead or underground electrical distribution rights upon, under and across real property in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Wastewater Treatment Division permission to construct, maintain, and operate a transformer and retaining….CB 120585 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Wastewater Treatment Division permission to construct, maintain, and operate a transformer and retaining….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126840June 26, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Wastewater Treatment Division permission to construct, maintain, and operate a transformer and retaining wall at 63rd Avenue Southwest, intersecting with Beach Drive Southwest and Southwest Spokane Street, for an unlimited term; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,023. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends the duration of the block-the-box and transit-only lane camera enforcement programs.CB 120599 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends the duration of the block-the-box and transit-only lane camera enforcement programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126841June 28, 2023
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE extending the duration of the block-the-box and transit-only lane camera enforcement programs; amending Ordinance 126183; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to grant limited property and access rights to the State….CB 120597 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to grant limited property and access rights to the State….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126849June 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to grant limited property and access rights to the State of Washington over and under a portion of real property known as Fire Station 22; and accepting payment of the mutually agreed upon value of the property and access rights sold; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $111,080. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute, for and on behalf of The City of Seattle, an agreement with New Rising Sun….CB 120604 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute, for and on behalf of The City of Seattle, an agreement with New Rising Sun….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126847June 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Arts & CultureProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute, for and on behalf of The City of Seattle, an agreement with New Rising Sun for the presentation of the annual Bumbershoot Music & Arts Festival at the Seattle Center, and related events and activities throughout the year; superseding Resolution 29017; repealing Ordinance 117522; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $290,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center (CEN). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation and the Director of the Seattle Center to execute for and on behalf of The….CB 120590 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation and the Director of the Seattle Center to execute for and on behalf of The….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126846June 30, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Waterfront Park and public spaces; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation and the Director of the Seattle Center to execute for and on behalf of The City of Seattle an agreement with Friends of Waterfront Seattle for operation and maintenance of Waterfront Park and public spaces; and ratifying and confirming certain acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center (CEN). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes commencement of cable franchise contract renewal proceedings in accordance with the provisions of 47 U.S.C. Section 546 and written request from….Res 32095 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes commencement of cable franchise contract renewal proceedings in accordance with the provisions of 47 U.S.C. Section 546 and written request from….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 14, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION authorizing commencement of cable franchise contract renewal proceedings in accordance with the provisions of 47 U.S.C. Section 546 and written request from Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle IT. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a lease with the Department….CB 120620 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a lease with the Department….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126866July 27, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a lease with the Department of the Army for the City’s continued use of an approximately 13,000-square-foot warehouse facility at 1561 Alaskan Way South for the operation of the St. Martin de Porres Shelter for homeless men over the age of 50; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the shared City and community goals and strategies of the Future of the Seattle Economy investment agenda as City policy and….Res 32099 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & DevelopmentEconomic Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes the shared City and community goals and strategies of the Future of the Seattle Economy investment agenda as City policy and….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 4, 2023
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentEconomic Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing the shared City and community goals and strategies of the Future of the Seattle Economy investment agenda as City policy and a critical foundation for economic development work in Seattle.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 32096 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 8, 2023
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; superseding Resolutions 32029 and 32051.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
To initiate a new business improvement area, to be known as the Seattle Tourism Improvement Area.Res 32104 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTourism & Workforce DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

To initiate a new business improvement area, to be known as the Seattle Tourism Improvement Area.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Tourism & Workforce DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION to initiate a new business improvement area, to be known as the Seattle Tourism Improvement Area.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports the development of lids across Interstate 5.Res 32100 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports the development of lids across Interstate 5.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 8, 2023
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote3 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting the development of lids across Interstate 5.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote3 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
Requests the United States Congress and the President pass and sign legislation creating a National Infrastructure Bank.Res 32107 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests the United States Congress and the President pass and sign legislation creating a National Infrastructure Bank.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 18, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting the United States Congress and the President pass and sign legislation creating a National Infrastructure Bank.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
Documenting compliance with the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as amended by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021.Res 32108 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Documenting compliance with the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as amended by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 25, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; documenting compliance with the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as amended by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the Civil Service system.CB 120654 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & BenefitsWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the Civil Service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126897September 25, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & BenefitsWorkplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Third Quarter 2023 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the Civil Service system; exempting a position from the Civil Service system; administratively adjusting the salary schedule for two titles; and establishing three new titles; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the Seattle Housing Authority’s use of certain excess revenues from the sale, lease, or other disposition of property in the Yesler….Res 32109 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the Seattle Housing Authority’s use of certain excess revenues from the sale, lease, or other disposition of property in the Yesler….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 25, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the Seattle Housing Authority’s use of certain excess revenues from the sale, lease, or other disposition of property in the Yesler Terrace Redevelopment Area for the provision of services that benefit the residents of the community.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Housing Authority/Legislative. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses the Philippine Human Rights Act.Res 32113 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Endorses the Philippine Human Rights Act.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 29, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing the Philippine Human Rights Act.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,023. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Intergovernmental Relations. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
Authorizes an Operations and Management Agreement between The City of Seattle, a Washington State municipal corporation, by and through Seattle Parks and….CB 120664 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an Operations and Management Agreement between The City of Seattle, a Washington State municipal corporation, by and through Seattle Parks and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126906October 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing an Operations and Management Agreement between The City of Seattle, a Washington State municipal corporation, by and through Seattle Parks and Recreation, and the Downtown Business Improvement Association, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, to enter into an operation and management agreement for activation and programming services at Bell St. Park, Occidental Square, Pioneer Square and Westlake Park; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property at 6109 S Fountain St.CB 120650 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property at 6109 S Fountain St.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126905October 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property at 6109 S Fountain St; authorizing acceptance of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $110,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….CB 120663 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMSProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126908October 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property lease with PTL Property Limited Partnership, on behalf of the Seattle Fire Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $29,286. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Second Amendment to the Easement Agreement.CB 120667 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Second Amendment to the Easement Agreement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126907October 2, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Second Amendment to the Easement Agreement; authorizing acceptance of a recording of the Second Amendment to the Easement Agreement; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a new 15-year business improvement area to be known as the Seattle Tourism Improvement Area.CB 120641 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originTourism & Workforce DevelopmentNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a new 15-year business improvement area to be known as the Seattle Tourism Improvement Area.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126912October 4, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Tourism & Workforce DevelopmentNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Tourism Improvement Areas; establishing a new 15-year business improvement area to be known as the Seattle Tourism Improvement Area; levying special assessments upon owners of businesses offering transient accommodations with 60 or more rooms within the area; providing for the deposit of revenues in a special account and expenditures therefrom; providing for collection of and penalties for delinquencies; providing for the establishment of a Ratepayers Advisory Board; providing for an implementation agreement with a Program Manager; disestablishing the existing Seattle Tourism Improvement Area that was established by Ordinance 123714 (“2011 STIA”) and later modified by Ordinance 126552; suspending the issuance of special assessments and providing for the continuity of services under the 2011 STIA; providing for the transfer of any remaining funds from the 2011 STIA Account; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Economic Development. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into an Agreed Order or Consent Decree with the Washington State Department of Ecology or….CB 120644 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into an Agreed Order or Consent Decree with the Washington State Department of Ecology or….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126920October 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into an Agreed Order or Consent Decree with the Washington State Department of Ecology or U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to undertake work at the Duwamish Waterway Park site; and to seek and accept state Remedial Action Grants for cleanup work related to the site.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the City's good faith intent to consider raising in the collective bargaining process for the Seattle Police Management Association (SPMA) 2024….Res 32112 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPoliceCollective BargainingGovernment Accountability Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming the City's good faith intent to consider raising in the collective bargaining process for the Seattle Police Management Association (SPMA) 2024….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceCollective BargainingGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming the City's good faith intent to consider raising in the collective bargaining process for the Seattle Police Management Association (SPMA) 2024 contract renewal police accountability proposals that have been identified by the public and the City’s police oversight agencies.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG Greg Doss NA. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the City Council’s and the Mayor’s intent to recognize the seismic retrofit of unreinforced masonry buildings in compliance with the City’s….Res 32111 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the City Council’s and the Mayor’s intent to recognize the seismic retrofit of unreinforced masonry buildings in compliance with the City’s….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring the City Council’s and the Mayor’s intent to recognize the seismic retrofit of unreinforced masonry buildings in compliance with the City’s URM Retrofit Technical Standard.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDCI Amanda Hertzfeld Christie Parker. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Seattle Department of Transportation Director to approve the transfer of the railway franchise granting the right, privilege, and accompanying authority….CB 120677 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & SidewalksProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Authorizes the Seattle Department of Transportation Director to approve the transfer of the railway franchise granting the right, privilege, and accompanying authority….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126925October 26, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Seattle Department of Transportation Director to approve the transfer of the railway franchise granting the right, privilege, and accompanying authority to locate, lay down, construct, maintain, own, and operate standard gauge railway tracks along the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company's former Washington Branch Line right-of-way, between 6th Avenue NW and NW 67th Street, from the Ballard Terminal Railroad Company to the Meeker Southern Railroad, subject to the operating agreement and all other conditions approved under Ordinance 118734; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports a long-term ceasefire in Israel and occupied Palestine, the return of all hostages, and the delivery of humanitarian aid.Res 32118 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports a long-term ceasefire in Israel and occupied Palestine, the return of all hostages, and the delivery of humanitarian aid.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 27, 2023
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed · 3 abstained
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting a long-term ceasefire in Israel and occupied Palestine, the return of all hostages, and the delivery of humanitarian aid; and affirming opposition to Antisemitism and Islamophobia.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed · 3 abstained
Establishes the 2024 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.CB 120682 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the 2024 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126937December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; establishing the 2024 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services; and superseding previous park and recreation fee schedules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125460, as amended by Ordinance 125987, to incorporate, ratify, and confirm certain contingent amendments thereto that were to become effective….CB 120685 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125460, as amended by Ordinance 125987, to incorporate, ratify, and confirm certain contingent amendments thereto that were to become effective….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126940December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; amending Ordinance 125460, as amended by Ordinance 125987, to incorporate, ratify, and confirm certain contingent amendments thereto that were to become effective upon the occurrence of certain events that have since occurred and making certain other technical amendments; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Finance / City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolution 31334.Res 32114 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31334.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31334; establishing the City Council’s intent to fund the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System as informed by the January 1, 2023 Actuarial Study.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2024.Res 32115 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2024.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2024.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET Paige Alderete Dave Hennes. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a fund for depositing settlement proceeds related to opioid manufacturing, distribution, and dispensing.CB 120688 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a fund for depositing settlement proceeds related to opioid manufacturing, distribution, and dispensing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126943December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City finances; creating a fund for depositing settlement proceeds related to opioid manufacturing, distribution, and dispensing; creating a Budget Summary Level; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renaming the Community Safety and Communications Center to the Community Assisted Response and Engagement Department.CB 120707 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renaming the Community Safety and Communications Center to the Community Assisted Response and Engagement Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126954December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the organization of City government; renaming the Community Safety and Communications Center to the Community Assisted Response and Engagement Department; requesting that the Code Reviser revise the Seattle Municipal Code accordingly; and amending Sections 3.15.060 and 3.15.062 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2024.CB 120708 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2024.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126955December 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2024; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Calling upon the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to issue a recall of Kia and Hyundai models lacking immobilizer technology that are….Res 32122 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTraffic SafetyTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Calling upon the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to issue a recall of Kia and Hyundai models lacking immobilizer technology that are….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 15, 2023
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic SafetyTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling upon the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to issue a recall of Kia and Hyundai models lacking immobilizer technology that are vulnerable to theft.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the Civil Service system.CB 120709 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the Civil Service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126960December 18, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Fourth Quarter 2023 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the Civil Service system; exempting a position from the Civil Service system; retitling existing titles; establishing new titles; and abrogating positions; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets the terms of office of the members of the Oversight Committee and authorizing it to consider issues regarding programs funded by….Res 32117 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingGovernment Accountability Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets the terms of office of the members of the Oversight Committee and authorizing it to consider issues regarding programs funded by….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 18, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the 2023 Housing Levy Oversight Committee; setting the terms of office of the members of the Oversight Committee and authorizing it to consider issues regarding programs funded by earlier housing levies.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,023. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates modified biennial budgeting processes.Res 32116 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates modified biennial budgeting processes.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 18, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City’s annual budget process; updating modified biennial budgeting processes; establishing guidelines for mid-year budget changes; establishing data sharing and reporting requirements; and superseding Resolutions 28885 and 31954.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124917 to transfer jurisdiction of the former Dumar Substation, 1605 SW Holden Street, to the Office of Housing for the….CB 120714 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124917 to transfer jurisdiction of the former Dumar Substation, 1605 SW Holden Street, to the Office of Housing for the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126961December 18, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the transfer of City real property for housing development; amending Ordinance 124917 to transfer jurisdiction of the former Dumar Substation, 1605 SW Holden Street, to the Office of Housing for the purpose of developing permanently affordable homeownership; authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing or the Director’s designee (“Director”) to issue a request for proposals and to select a developer and thereafter to execute and deliver a contract for transfer of land, deed, and related documents; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $424,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of an interlocal agreement between The City of Seattle and King County to regulate for-hire transportation services.CB 120656 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of an interlocal agreement between The City of Seattle and King County to regulate for-hire transportation services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126978December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to for-hire transportation; authorizing the execution of an interlocal agreement between The City of Seattle and King County to regulate for-hire transportation services.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses strategies to improve the movement of people and goods in Seattle’s industrial and maritime areas.Res 32097 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Endorses strategies to improve the movement of people and goods in Seattle’s industrial and maritime areas.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 28, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing strategies to improve the movement of people and goods in Seattle’s industrial and maritime areas.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds and easements relating to the State Route 99 Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program.CB 120721 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds and easements relating to the State Route 99 Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126967December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds and easements relating to the State Route 99 Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds and easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: portions of the SE 1/4 of Section 6, T24N R4E, W.M.; the NE 1/4 of Section 7, T24N R4E, W.M.; Section 30, T25N R4E, W.M.; Lots 3, 4, 6, and 7, Block 328, Seattle Tide Lands; Lots 1 through 7 and Lots 13 through 19, Block 329, Seattle Tide Lands; Lots 1 through 6, Block 330, Seattle Tide Lands; Lots 1 through 5 and Lot 17, Block 331, Seattle Tide Lands; Lots 1 through 18, Block 367, Seattle Tide Lands; Lots 1 through 19, Block 368, Seattle Tide Lands; Lots 1 through 9, Block 369, Seattle Tide Lands; Lots 1 through 7, Black’s Replat of Portions of Lots 18 and 19 of Block 368, Seattle Tide Lands, together with unrecorded plat; Lots 1 through 8, H. H. Dearborn’s Replat of part of Blk. 329, Seattle Tide Lands; Lots 1 through 11, Block 72, D. T. Denny’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; Lot 7, Block 74, D. T. Denny’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; Lots 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 75, D. T. Denny’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; Lots 4 through 6, Block 71, D. T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; D. T. Denny Donation Land Claim No. 38; and Seattle Dock Company’s Replat of Lots 10 and 16 inclusive of Blk. 369, Seattle Tide Lands; together with the vacated alleys and streets thereof.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to grant and convey utility easements under portions of Magnolia Park, Magnolia Boulevard, Ursula Judkins….CB 120719 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to grant and convey utility easements under portions of Magnolia Park, Magnolia Boulevard, Ursula Judkins….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126981December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to grant and convey utility easements under portions of Magnolia Park, Magnolia Boulevard, Ursula Judkins Viewpoint Park, and Smith Cove Park to the King County Wastewater Treatment Division for the purposes of operating a Combined Sewer Overflow pipeline, and to accept payment therefor; and finding that the grant of a permanent subsurface easement meets the requirements of Ordinance 118477, adopting Initiative 42.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $329,858. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record a deed for street purposes from King County, a….CB 120723 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record a deed for street purposes from King County, a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126968December 28, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the East Marginal Way Corridor Improvement project - North Segment under the Heavy Haul Network Program - East Marginal Way; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record a deed for street purposes from King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, situated in a portion of vacated South Lander Street, Seattle Tide Lands in the Southeast quarter of Section 7, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian and the Northeast quarter of Section 18, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing a portion of right-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deed under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $28,400. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2024 State Legislative Agenda.Res 32120 · Resolution (Res) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2024 State Legislative Agenda.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 28, 2023
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 1 abstained
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2024 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 1 abstained
Superseding Resolution 31947.Res 32037 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Superseding Resolution 31947.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 4, 2022
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2022 and 2023; and superseding Resolution 31947.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2022-2023.Res 32036 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2022-2023.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 4, 2022
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2022-2023; superseding Resolution 31924.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Superseding Resolution 31927.Res 32038 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Superseding Resolution 31927.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 18, 2022
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2022 and 2023, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 31927.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports Seattle School District No. 1’s Proposition 1 and Proposition 2 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Proposition 1 and….Res 32039 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originYouth & EducationElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports Seattle School District No. 1’s Proposition 1 and Proposition 2 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Proposition 1 and….

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 24, 2022
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Seattle School District No. 1’s Proposition 1 and Proposition 2 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Proposition 1 and Proposition 2 on the February 8, 2022, special election ballot.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts the deed to certain real property located at 5910 Corson Ave South (Parcel A) and 933 S Doris St, (Parcel B)….CB 120258 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originLibraries & Community FacilitiesCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts the deed to certain real property located at 5910 Corson Ave South (Parcel A) and 933 S Doris St, (Parcel B)….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126529February 1, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Libraries & Community FacilitiesCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting the deed to certain real property located at 5910 Corson Ave South (Parcel A) and 933 S Doris St, (Parcel B), Seattle for general municipal purposes, to be used for consolidation of the Seattle Public Library’s building maintenance, custodial, landscaping, storage, and fleet facilities at one site; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Library. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Department to accept as sole owner of fiber cable and associated facilities previously shared with the University of Washington.CB 120260 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Department to accept as sole owner of fiber cable and associated facilities previously shared with the University of Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126531February 3, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Department to accept as sole owner of fiber cable and associated facilities previously shared with the University of Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes and directing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the Kalispel Tribe….CB 120259 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes and directing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the Kalispel Tribe….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126530February 3, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing and directing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the Kalispel Tribe of Indians.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the City Light Department’s Clean Energy Implementation Plan as required under Washington State’s Clean Energy Transformation Act.Res 32040 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming the City Light Department’s Clean Energy Implementation Plan as required under Washington State’s Clean Energy Transformation Act.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 3, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; affirming the City Light Department’s Clean Energy Implementation Plan as required under Washington State’s Clean Energy Transformation Act.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing the Seattle City Council’s support for workers at Starbucks in Seattle who are attempting to form a union, and urging Starbucks….Res 32041 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Expressing the Seattle City Council’s support for workers at Starbucks in Seattle who are attempting to form a union, and urging Starbucks….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 8, 2022
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the Seattle City Council’s support for workers at Starbucks in Seattle who are attempting to form a union, and urging Starbucks to accept card check neutrality.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Calling for a special election to fill a vacancy in the City employee-elected position on the Civil Service Commission and directing the….Res 32042 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originWorkplace StandardsElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Calling for a special election to fill a vacancy in the City employee-elected position on the Civil Service Commission and directing the….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 15, 2022
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace StandardsElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for a special election to fill a vacancy in the City employee-elected position on the Civil Service Commission and directing the City Clerk to administer the election.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,022. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2022 Work Program.Res 32046 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts the Seattle City Council 2022 Work Program.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 1, 2022
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2022 Work Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Retroactively authorizing a one-month hiring bonus incentive program for hiring 911 dispatchers and police officers.CB 120272 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolice Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Retroactively authorizing a one-month hiring bonus incentive program for hiring 911 dispatchers and police officers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126542March 3, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to staffing shortages in the Community Safety Communications Center and the Seattle Police Department; retroactively authorizing a one-month hiring bonus incentive program for hiring 911 dispatchers and police officers; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $220,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor and the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute a memorandum of agreement between The….CB 120278 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originParks & RecreationElectricityCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor and the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute a memorandum of agreement between The….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126547March 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationElectricityCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Mayor and the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute a memorandum of agreement between The City of Seattle, the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, and the National Park Service for the transfer and curation of certain precontact archeological artifacts recovered during the 2013 Newhalem Gorge Inn Restoration Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts the Northgate Easement Agreement granted by the State of Washington, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, on behalf of North….CB 120271 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitStreets & SidewalksBridges & Structures Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts the Northgate Easement Agreement granted by the State of Washington, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, on behalf of North….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126551March 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitStreets & SidewalksBridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the John Lewis Memorial Bridge constructed under the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Northgate Bridge and Cycle Track Project; accepting the Northgate Easement Agreement granted by the State of Washington, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, on behalf of North Seattle College, dated February 28, 2019; accepting a Pedestrian Bridge Easement Agreement granted by the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, a regional transit authority, dated April 22, 2021; accepting the Trail Lease granted by the Washington State Department of Transportation, dated September 29, 2021; placing the real property interests conveyed by such easements and lease under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns portions of property in the west half of the Northwest quarter of Section 32, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian and the east half of the Northeast quarter of Section 31, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends for six months interim development controls established by Ordinance 126293 to allow home-based businesses to operate with fewer limitations during the….CB 120265 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends for six months interim development controls established by Ordinance 126293 to allow home-based businesses to operate with fewer limitations during the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126555April 5, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use regulation of home occupations; extending for six months interim development controls established by Ordinance 126293 to allow home-based businesses to operate with fewer limitations during the COVID-19 civil emergency; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Approves and ratifying the decision of the Metropolitan King County Council to adopt a revised set of Countywide Planning Policies.Res 32048 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves and ratifying the decision of the Metropolitan King County Council to adopt a revised set of Countywide Planning Policies.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 5, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving and ratifying the decision of the Metropolitan King County Council to adopt a revised set of Countywide Planning Policies.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants BSOP 1, LLC, permission to construct, maintain, and operate a private parking area on East Howe Street, east of Fairview Avenue….CB 120281 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants BSOP 1, LLC, permission to construct, maintain, and operate a private parking area on East Howe Street, east of Fairview Avenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126561April 19, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting BSOP 1, LLC, permission to construct, maintain, and operate a private parking area on East Howe Street, east of Fairview Avenue East, for a 15-year term, renewable for one successive 15-year term; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $25,488. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2022 calendar year.Res 32047 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2022 calendar year.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 19, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2022 calendar year.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
To stop privatizing the United States Medicare system.Res 32052 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

To stop privatizing the United States Medicare system.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 26, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION to stop privatizing the United States Medicare system.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,022. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Grants The Boeing Company permission to continue maintaining and operating two pedestrian tunnels under and across 16th Avenue South, 565 feet south….CB 120290 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants The Boeing Company permission to continue maintaining and operating two pedestrian tunnels under and across 16th Avenue South, 565 feet south….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126566May 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting The Boeing Company permission to continue maintaining and operating two pedestrian tunnels under and across 16th Avenue South, 565 feet south of East Marginal Way South, and under and across East Marginal Way South, 510 feet east of 16th Avenue South; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 123540; and providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $8,282. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating a portion of 39th Avenue South, lying south of South Willow Street and between Tract 2 of Coffman Garden Tracts, in….CB 120304 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating a portion of 39th Avenue South, lying south of South Willow Street and between Tract 2 of Coffman Garden Tracts, in….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126573May 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating a portion of 39th Avenue South, lying south of South Willow Street and between Tract 2 of Coffman Garden Tracts, in the Othello neighborhood, and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement, on the petition of Willow Crossing LLLP (Clerk File 314422).

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $525,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the template for regular payment of claims ordinances.Res 32049 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Modifies the template for regular payment of claims ordinances.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 5, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION modifying the template for regular payment of claims ordinances.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies Ordinance 126081 concerning repayment plans for rental arrears accrued during or within six months after the termination of the civil emergency….CB 120305 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Modifies Ordinance 126081 concerning repayment plans for rental arrears accrued during or within six months after the termination of the civil emergency….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126571May 5, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE modifying Ordinance 126081 concerning repayment plans for rental arrears accrued during or within six months after the termination of the civil emergency declared on March 3, 2020.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
In support of abortion rights and other reproductive rights, in opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion in Dobbs v.….Res 32054 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

In support of abortion rights and other reproductive rights, in opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion in Dobbs v.….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 11, 2022
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of abortion rights and other reproductive rights, in opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization; and urging state and federal elected officials to codify abortion rights and other reproductive rights.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2021 surveillance impact report and 2021 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120307 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2021 surveillance impact report and 2021 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126579May 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2021 surveillance impact report and 2021 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Audio Recording Systems.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2021 surveillance impact report and 2021 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120309 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2021 surveillance impact report and 2021 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126580May 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2021 surveillance impact report and 2021 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of IBM i2 iBase.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 32051 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 24, 2022
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; amending Rules III and V in Attachment 1 of Resolution 32029.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Stating the Council’s intent to lift a proviso on anticipated 2022 salary and benefits savings to fund staffing incentives for uniformed police….Res 32050 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originPoliceCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Stating the Council’s intent to lift a proviso on anticipated 2022 salary and benefits savings to fund staffing incentives for uniformed police….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 24, 2022
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
PoliceCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Police Department; stating the Council’s intent to lift a proviso on anticipated 2022 salary and benefits savings to fund staffing incentives for uniformed police officers.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
AN ORDINANCE, granting permission to 2001 Sixth L.L.C. to continue operating and maintaining a utility tunnel under the alley between 5th Avenue….CB 120300 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

AN ORDINANCE, granting permission to 2001 Sixth L.L.C. to continue operating and maintaining a utility tunnel under the alley between 5th Avenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126590May 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE, granting permission to 2001 Sixth L.L.C. to continue operating and maintaining a utility tunnel under the alley between 5th Avenue and 6th Avenue, north of Virginia Street; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 119437; and providing acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $3,341. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants King County permission to continue maintaining and operating two pedestrian tunnels under and across 9th Avenue, between Alder Street and Jefferson….CB 120301 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants King County permission to continue maintaining and operating two pedestrian tunnels under and across 9th Avenue, between Alder Street and Jefferson….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126591May 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting King County permission to continue maintaining and operating two pedestrian tunnels under and across 9th Avenue, between Alder Street and Jefferson Street; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 123842; and providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $7,508. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate private communication conduit under and across Latona Avenue Northeast, north of Northeast Northlake Way.Res 32053 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate private communication conduit under and across Latona Avenue Northeast, north of Northeast Northlake Way.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate private communication conduit under and across Latona Avenue Northeast, north of Northeast Northlake Way; as proposed by Dunn Lumber Company, as part of the construction of a new lumber warehouse in the Wallingford neighborhood.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending a proviso imposed by Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.CB 120320 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPoliceBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending a proviso imposed by Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126589May 26, 2022
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
PoliceBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Seattle Police Department; amending a proviso imposed by Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $650,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept a non-exclusive easement within the Shilshole Bay Waterway, previously known as the….CB 120322 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept a non-exclusive easement within the Shilshole Bay Waterway, previously known as the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126601June 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatWater & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept a non-exclusive easement within the Shilshole Bay Waterway, previously known as the Salmon Bay Waterway of the Lake Washington Ship Canal, from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for a City-owned sanitary sewer line; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts two deeds for real property acquired for the purpose of installing and operating ground water wells or waterworks to provide potable….CB 120323 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts two deeds for real property acquired for the purpose of installing and operating ground water wells or waterworks to provide potable….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126602June 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting two deeds for real property acquired for the purpose of installing and operating ground water wells or waterworks to provide potable water in connection with the Highline Well Field project identified in the 1985 Seattle Comprehensive Regional Water Plan and situated in Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, King County, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $140,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute, for and on behalf of the City, a Concession Agreement with Compass Group….CB 120341 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute, for and on behalf of the City, a Concession Agreement with Compass Group….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126604June 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute, for and on behalf of the City, a Concession Agreement with Compass Group USA, Inc., doing business as Canteen, to provide food and beverage vending machine service in City park facilities identified in the agreement and additional City park facilities and locations approved by the Superintendent.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $40,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending a proviso imposed by Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.CB 120348 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originCourts & Legal EnforcementBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending a proviso imposed by Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126606June 24, 2022
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Tammy J. Morales
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Courts & Legal EnforcementBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Seattle Municipal Court; amending a proviso imposed by Ordinance 126490, which adopted the 2022 Budget; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $88,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….CB 120340 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126609July 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property lease with the Washington State Department of Transportation on behalf of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $14,900. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of Seattle Public Utilities.CB 120346 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126613July 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of Seattle Public Utilities; and authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to grant a subsurface utility easement and temporary construction easement to King County for the purpose of installing, constructing, owning, operating, maintaining, and repairing a trunk sewer line crossing The City of Seattle’s East Side Supply Line right-of-way.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $372,519. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
AN ORDINANCE, approving and confirming the plat of “The Grove” in the portions of Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Section 27….CB 120353 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

AN ORDINANCE, approving and confirming the plat of “The Grove” in the portions of Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Section 27….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126618July 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE, approving and confirming the plat of “The Grove” in the portions of Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, Washington.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Regarding Initiative 134 concerning allowing voters to vote for multiple candidates in primary elections (rejected by the City Council on July 14….Res 32057 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Regarding Initiative 134 concerning allowing voters to vote for multiple candidates in primary elections (rejected by the City Council on July 14….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 14, 2022
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding Initiative 134 concerning allowing voters to vote for multiple candidates in primary elections (rejected by the City Council on July 14, 2022); authorizing the City Clerk and the Executive Director of the Ethics and Elections Commission to take those actions necessary to enable proposed Initiative 134 to appear on the November 8, 2022, ballot and the local voters’ pamphlet in conjunction with the Ranked Choice Voting proposal (City Council Bill 120369), which is a proposed alternative measure on the same subject matter in accordance with Charter Article IV; requesting the King County Elections Director to place the proposed Initiative 134 and its alternate on the November 8, 2022, election ballot in accordance with applicable law; and providing for the publication of such proposed Initiative Measure and its alternate.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides recommendations to the Sound Transit Board as to the selection of the Preferred Alternative for the West Seattle and Ballard Link….Res 32055 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides recommendations to the Sound Transit Board as to the selection of the Preferred Alternative for the West Seattle and Ballard Link….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 19, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Sound Transit; providing recommendations to the Sound Transit Board as to the selection of the Preferred Alternative for the West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions project to be studied in the Final Environmental Impact Statement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOWCP. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City Light Department.Res 32056 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City Light Department.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 27, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the City Light Department; adopting a 2023-2028 Strategic Plan Update for the City Light Department and endorsing the associated six-year rate path.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Declares a portion of Lot 31, Block 2, Kramer Heights Addition, Volume 13 of Plats, page 66, that is not needed for….CB 120371 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares a portion of Lot 31, Block 2, Kramer Heights Addition, Volume 13 of Plats, page 66, that is not needed for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126637August 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; declaring a portion of Lot 31, Block 2, Kramer Heights Addition, Volume 13 of Plats, page 66, that is not needed for street purposes, as surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of said northern 45 feet of the property to the owners of the adjoining property at fair market value; and authorizing the transfer of the southern 65 feet of the property to the owners of the adjoining property, with covenants on the property to benefit affordable housing; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute all documents for the transfer of the properties; and directing how the proceeds from the sale shall be distributed.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City Light Department.CB 120378 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126642August 4, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an operation and maintenance agreement and a telecommunications agreement, both with Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service….CB 120373 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126648August 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service meters, and appurtenances necessary for water utility purposes at various locations in Seattle; placing the property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the civil service system.CB 120387 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126645August 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Third Quarter 2022 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the civil service system; and adjusting the pay band of a discretionary pay program title.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Condemning harassment, threats, and political violence against elected officials, election workers, those seeking elected office, and other public servants.Res 32065 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Condemning harassment, threats, and political violence against elected officials, election workers, those seeking elected office, and other public servants.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 16, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION condemning harassment, threats, and political violence against elected officials, election workers, those seeking elected office, and other public servants.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Acknowledging and approving the 2022 Integrated Resource Plan as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle and the….Res 32061 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acknowledging and approving the 2022 Integrated Resource Plan as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle and the….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 18, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving the 2022 Integrated Resource Plan as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle and the requirements of the State of Washington; and approving the Integrated Resource Plan for the biennium September 2022 through August 2024.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Declares the City Council’s intent to phase out gas-powered leaf blowers.Res 32064 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Declares the City Council’s intent to phase out gas-powered leaf blowers.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 6, 2022
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring the City Council’s intent to phase out gas-powered leaf blowers; establishing goals and identifying actions to meet these goals.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs.CB 120395 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126662September 14, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs; granting easements to the City of Renton, for public roadway, Renton-owned utilities, storm drainage, and devices for traffic control purposes, for the improvement of Rainier Avenue South, over, under and across a portion of City's Cedar River Pipeline right of way, in the East ½ Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $454,600. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a….CB 120384 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126661September 14, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the South Park Bridge project; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a quit claim deed from King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, for property situated in Lots 9 through 13, Block 37, South Park; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by such deed under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation and designating for transportation purposes; laying off the deed as right-of-way; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the City’s commitments and plans for supporting cannabis workers and supporting communities disproportionately harmed by the federal War on Drugs.CB 120391 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the City’s commitments and plans for supporting cannabis workers and supporting communities disproportionately harmed by the federal War on Drugs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126663September 19, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing the City’s commitments and plans for supporting cannabis workers and supporting communities disproportionately harmed by the federal War on Drugs.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $250,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Regarding Initiative 135 concerning developing and maintaining affordable social housing in Seattle.Res 32069 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Regarding Initiative 135 concerning developing and maintaining affordable social housing in Seattle.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 20, 2022
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding Initiative 135 concerning developing and maintaining affordable social housing in Seattle; authorizing the City Clerk and the Executive Director of the Ethics and Elections Commission to take those actions necessary to enable the proposed Initiative Measure to appear on the February 14, 2023, ballot and the local voters’ pamphlet; requesting the King County Elections Director to place the proposed Initiative Measure on the February 14, 2023, ballot; and providing for the publication of such proposed Initiative Measure.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $750,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807.CB 120398 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126679September 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2018 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy; amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDEEL. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Celebrating the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of the Discovery Park Master Plan.Res 32066 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Celebrating the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of the Discovery Park Master Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 26, 2022
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION celebrating the fiftieth anniversary of the adoption of the Discovery Park Master Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,022. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of an amendment to General Maintenance Agreement GMB 1094 between The City of Seattle and the State of Washington, to….CB 120419 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & StructuresProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of an amendment to General Maintenance Agreement GMB 1094 between The City of Seattle and the State of Washington, to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126686October 5, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the State Route 520 Bridge Replacement and High Occupancy Vehicle Program; authorizing execution of an amendment to General Maintenance Agreement GMB 1094 between The City of Seattle and the State of Washington, to add the Portage Bay Bridge and Roanoke Lid Project.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedTransportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Endorses the goals of the Downtown Seattle Association’s Third Avenue Vision.Res 32067 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Endorses the goals of the Downtown Seattle Association’s Third Avenue Vision.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 5, 2022
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing the goals of the Downtown Seattle Association’s Third Avenue Vision; and stating the intent of The City of Seattle to work collaboratively with the Downtown Seattle Association, King County Metro, and Sound Transit to pursue improvements to Third Avenue in Downtown Seattle.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of two memoranda of understanding between the City of Seattle certain City unions.CB 120447 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of two memoranda of understanding between the City of Seattle certain City unions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126697November 3, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of two memoranda of understanding between the City of Seattle certain City unions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Request that SDOT and SPD provide an implementation plan for the expansion of the School Zone Camera program and make recommendations for….SLI SDOT-304-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPoliceZoningYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT and SPD provide an implementation plan for the expansion of the School Zone Camera program and make recommendations for….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Alex Pedersen
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
PoliceZoningYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT and SPD provide an implementation plan for the expansion of the School Zone Camera program and make recommendations for expansion of other camera programs authorized by State law

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Request that SDOT collaborate with SCL to complete the street frontage improvements for the Thomas Street Redesigned (MC-TR-C105) CIP Project.SLI SDOT-307-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT collaborate with SCL to complete the street frontage improvements for the Thomas Street Redesigned (MC-TR-C105) CIP Project.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT collaborate with SCL to complete the street frontage improvements for the Thomas Street Redesigned (MC-TR-C105) CIP Project

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness.SLI HSD-301-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Request that LAW provide quarterly reports on sexual assault cases in the Domestic Violence Unit.SLI LAW-601-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that LAW provide quarterly reports on sexual assault cases in the Domestic Violence Unit.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that LAW provide quarterly reports on sexual assault cases in the Domestic Violence Unit

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Adopts the Seattle Center fee range schedule from which the Seattle Center Director is authorized to set fees for use of Seattle….CB 120433 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Seattle Center fee range schedule from which the Seattle Center Director is authorized to set fees for use of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126708December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to facilities at Seattle Center; adopting the Seattle Center fee range schedule from which the Seattle Center Director is authorized to set fees for use of Seattle Center facilities and property; modifying the fee range for use of McCaw Hall; and modifying the terms and conditions applicable to facility use agreements for events at Seattle Center to remove the Director’s temporary authority to waive fees.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $4,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the 2023-2024 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.CB 120437 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the 2023-2024 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126712December 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; establishing the 2023-2024 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services; and superseding previous park and recreation fee schedules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2023.Res 32070 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2023.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2023.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolution 31334.Res 32071 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31334.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31334; establishing the City Council’s intent to fund the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System as informed by the January 1, 2022 Actuarial Study.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts revised financial policies for the Cumulative Reserve Subfund of the General Fund.Res 32075 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts revised financial policies for the Cumulative Reserve Subfund of the General Fund.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 2, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting revised financial policies for the Cumulative Reserve Subfund of the General Fund; and superseding Attachment A to Resolution 31952.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports the Whole Washington State Universal Healthcare Initiative.Res 32074 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originPublic Health Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports the Whole Washington State Universal Healthcare Initiative.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 6, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote4 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
Public Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting the Whole Washington State Universal Healthcare Initiative.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote4 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2023.CB 120457 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2023.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126725December 7, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2023; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Returning positions to the civil service system.CB 120468 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126727December 8, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Fourth Quarter 2022 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the civil service system; exempting positions from the civil service system; and establishing new titles and corresponding rates of pay; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses the 2023-2024 Legislative Department Racial Equity Work Plan developed by the Legislative Department’s Race and Social Justice Initiative Change Team to….Res 32077 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Endorses the 2023-2024 Legislative Department Racial Equity Work Plan developed by the Legislative Department’s Race and Social Justice Initiative Change Team to….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 13, 2022
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing the 2023-2024 Legislative Department Racial Equity Work Plan developed by the Legislative Department’s Race and Social Justice Initiative Change Team to improve racial equity in the Legislative Department and The City of Seattle.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs.CB 120470 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126738December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to relinquish such easement rights; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of sanitary sewers, storm drains, and appurtenances at various….CB 120471 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of sanitary sewers, storm drains, and appurtenances at various….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126733December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of sanitary sewers, storm drains, and appurtenances at various locations in Seattle; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs.CB 120472 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126734December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to relinquish such easement rights; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service….CB 120473 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126735December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service meters, and appurtenances necessary for water utility purposes at various locations in Seattle; placing the property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the real property rights relating to a water utility easement as being surplus to City utility needs.CB 120474 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the real property rights relating to a water utility easement as being surplus to City utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126736December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring the real property rights relating to a water utility easement as being surplus to City utility needs; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to relinquish such easement rights; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2022 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.CB 120462 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2022 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126730December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2022 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an interagency agreement with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to….CB 120475 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an interagency agreement with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126739December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an interagency agreement with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to operate the Cedar River Hatchery; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to execute an interlocal agreement with King County….CB 120476 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to execute an interlocal agreement with King County….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126740December 15, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to execute an interlocal agreement with King County, the City of Tukwila, and the Port of Seattle to cost-share a Duwamish Basin Steward staff position that will provide Basin Stewardship Services in the Duwamish Service area.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $66,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2023 State Legislative Agenda.Res 32076 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2023 State Legislative Agenda.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 15, 2022
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2023 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed · 2 abstained
Relating to certain properties in the city of Renton at the intersection of Interstate 405 and Seattle Public Utilities’ (SPU) Cedar River….CB 119955 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Relating to certain properties in the city of Renton at the intersection of Interstate 405 and Seattle Public Utilities’ (SPU) Cedar River….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126266January 8, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; relating to certain properties in the city of Renton at the intersection of Interstate 405 and Seattle Public Utilities’ (SPU) Cedar River Pipelines right-of-way; declaring certain property rights surplus to the needs of SPU; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of SPU to execute and deliver a Quit Claim Deed to the Washington State Department of Transportation and to accept a Quit Claim Deed and three easements from the State of Washington as consideration for the release of the surplus property rights, all as necessary for the relocation of SPU’s Cedar River water transmission pipelines in conjunction with the State’s construction of the I-405 Renton “S” Curves project; all located in the SE quarter of the NW quarter of the SW quarter of Section 17, Township 23, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Calling on federal government officials to immediately remove U.S. President Donald J. Trump from office by any means permitted by the U.S.….Res 31985 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Calling on federal government officials to immediately remove U.S. President Donald J. Trump from office by any means permitted by the U.S.….

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 15, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling on federal government officials to immediately remove U.S. President Donald J. Trump from office by any means permitted by the U.S. Constitution, including impeachment, for violating his oath of office on January 6, 2021 or for committing any other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,021. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Calling for U.S.-Cuban collaboration to save lives in the fight against COVID-19.Res 31984 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Calling for U.S.-Cuban collaboration to save lives in the fight against COVID-19.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 19, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Kshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for U.S.-Cuban collaboration to save lives in the fight against COVID-19.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of the Statutory Warranty Deed for the “Glacier View Ranch Property” in Skagit County, Washington.CB 119980 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of the Statutory Warranty Deed for the “Glacier View Ranch Property” in Skagit County, Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126273January 28, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the acceptance of the Statutory Warranty Deed for the “Glacier View Ranch Property” in Skagit County, Washington; placing said land under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the name to the Seattle Disability Commission.CB 119982 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originAccessibility Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the name to the Seattle Disability Commission.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126277February 9, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accessibility
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Commission for People with Disabilities; changing the name to the Seattle Disability Commission; and requesting that the Code Reviser revise the Seattle Municipal Code accordingly.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sponsoring the King County Regional Homelessness Authority’s application for membership to the Association of Washington Cities Risk Management Service Agency.Res 31987 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness Services Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sponsoring the King County Regional Homelessness Authority’s application for membership to the Association of Washington Cities Risk Management Service Agency.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 9, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION sponsoring the King County Regional Homelessness Authority’s application for membership to the Association of Washington Cities Risk Management Service Agency.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedHuman Services Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle….CB 119989 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originYouth & EducationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126281February 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Your Voice, Your Choice program; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, an easement for street purposes from Seattle School District No. 1, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, situated in a portion of the Tract described as “Reserve” in the Plat of S.P. Dixon’s Green Lake Acre Tracts; designating the easement for street purposes; placing the real property rights under the jurisdiction of SDOT; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $3,820. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Identifying the principles and activities characterizing equitable distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.Res 31992 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Identifying the principles and activities characterizing equitable distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 18, 2021
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying the principles and activities characterizing equitable distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses the creation by the State of Washington of the Rainier Valley Creative District.Res 31993 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-originArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Endorses the creation by the State of Washington of the Rainier Valley Creative District.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 22, 2021
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing the creation by the State of Washington of the Rainier Valley Creative District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Acknowledging and approving the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan Progress Report as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle….Res 31986 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acknowledging and approving the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan Progress Report as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 26, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging and approving the 2020 Integrated Resource Plan Progress Report as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle and the requirements of the State of Washington; and approving the Progress Report for the biennium September 2018 through August 2020.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2021 Work Program.Res 31994 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts the Seattle City Council 2021 Work Program.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 1, 2021
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2021 Work Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate a private parking area on East Howe Street, east of Fairview Avenue East.Res 31988 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate a private parking area on East Howe Street, east of Fairview Avenue East.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate a private parking area on East Howe Street, east of Fairview Avenue East; as proposed by BSOP 1, LLC, as part of developing a public plaza in unopened right-of-way in the Eastlake neighborhood.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2021 calendar year.Res 31991 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2021 calendar year.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 12, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2021 calendar year.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting surveillance impact reports for Seattle City Light’s use of Current Diversion Technologies.CB 120002 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originElectricityTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting surveillance impact reports for Seattle City Light’s use of Current Diversion Technologies.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126294March 25, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting surveillance impact reports for Seattle City Light’s use of Current Diversion Technologies.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSCL / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Fire Department’s use of Computer Aided Dispatch.CB 120003 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMSTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Fire Department’s use of Computer Aided Dispatch.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126295March 25, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Fire Department’s use of Computer Aided Dispatch.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSFD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to release a portion of an existing transmission corridor easement to the City of….CB 120008 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to release a portion of an existing transmission corridor easement to the City of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126296March 25, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to release a portion of an existing transmission corridor easement to the City of Kirkland; and accepting the payment of fair market value for the partial release of easement.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $19,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to accept the donation of real property via quit claim deed from the Seattle….CB 120013 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to accept the donation of real property via quit claim deed from the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126305April 16, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Transportation; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to accept the donation of real property via quit claim deed from the Seattle Parks Foundation, a Washington nonprofit corporation, situated in a portion in Lot 4, Block 13, University Lake Shore Addition Divisions 1, 2, and 3; placing the real property rights conveyed by such deed under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation to be used as part of the Lake City Living Memorial Triangle; laying off the property as right-of-way; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers partial jurisdiction of a portion of City Light’s Georgetown Steam Plant flume property to Seattle Public Utilities for maintenance, repair, replacement….CB 120014 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers partial jurisdiction of a portion of City Light’s Georgetown Steam Plant flume property to Seattle Public Utilities for maintenance, repair, replacement….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126306April 16, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department and Seattle Public Utilities; transferring partial jurisdiction of a portion of City Light’s Georgetown Steam Plant flume property to Seattle Public Utilities for maintenance, repair, replacement, and operation of public stormwater drainage infrastructure.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of 911 Logging Recorder technology.CB 120024 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of 911 Logging Recorder technology.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126311April 23, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of 911 Logging Recorder technology.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Automated License Plate Reader technology.CB 120025 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Automated License Plate Reader technology.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126312April 23, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Automated License Plate Reader technology.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Computer-Aided Dispatch technology.CB 120027 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Computer-Aided Dispatch technology.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126314April 23, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Computer-Aided Dispatch technology.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of the CopLogic technology.CB 120028 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of the CopLogic technology.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126315April 23, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the surveillance impact report for the Seattle Police Department’s use of the CopLogic technology.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Parking Enforcement Systems including Automated License….CB 120026 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Parking Enforcement Systems including Automated License….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126313April 23, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Parking Enforcement Systems including Automated License Plate Reader technology.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Supports renewal of King County’s Best Starts for Kids Levy.Res 32002 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports renewal of King County’s Best Starts for Kids Levy.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 23, 2021
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting renewal of King County’s Best Starts for Kids Levy.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,021. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Prioritizing people over the profits of pharmaceutical companies.Res 32004 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Prioritizing people over the profits of pharmaceutical companies.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 26, 2021
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION prioritizing people over the profits of pharmaceutical companies; supporting the production of COVID-19 vaccine around the world; urging President Biden to end U.S. opposition to the Waiver from Certain Provisions of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement for the Prevention, Containment and Treatment of COVID-19 at the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Office of Arts & Culture, on behalf of The City of Seattle, to accept a license….CB 120037 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originTransitArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Office of Arts & Culture, on behalf of The City of Seattle, to accept a license….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126323May 7, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the AIDS Memorial Pathway project; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Office of Arts & Culture, on behalf of The City of Seattle, to accept a license agreement for the installation and maintenance of artworks that are part of The City of Seattle’s Municipal Art Collection on property owned by Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, a regional transit authority of the State of Washington, and leaseholder MEPT Capitol Hill Station Joint Venture LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Arts & Culture. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Urging the United States Congress to enact legislation creating a roadmap to citizenship and other legislative priorities to support immigrants and refugees.Res 32005 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Urging the United States Congress to enact legislation creating a roadmap to citizenship and other legislative priorities to support immigrants and refugees.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 7, 2021
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION urging the United States Congress to enact legislation creating a roadmap to citizenship and other legislative priorities to support immigrants and refugees.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,021. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from Seattle School District 1, on behalf of The City of….CB 120033 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from Seattle School District 1, on behalf of The City of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126325May 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from Seattle School District 1, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a Reciprocal Right of Entry License Agreement concerning Helene Madison Pool (Ingraham High School) and Southwest Teen Life Center and Pool (Chief Sealth High School).

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a 2021-2026 Strategic Business Plan for Seattle Public Utilities.Res 32000 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2021-2026 Strategic Business Plan for Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Public Utilities; adopting a 2021-2026 Strategic Business Plan for Seattle Public Utilities; and endorsing a three-year rate path and a subsequent, three-year rate forecast to support the Strategic Business Plan Update.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of City Light.CB 120045 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of City Light.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126328May 13, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of City Light; and authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an easement agreement with King County, allowing the temporary use of a portion of City Light property to resolve the encroachment of an existing structure located on the west side of Boeing Field within the Northeast Quarter of Section 29 Township 24 Range 4 and the Southeast Quarter of Section 29 Township 24 Range 4.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants permission to Northwest Kidney Center to continue to operate and maintain a pedestrian tunnel under and across Broadway, north of Cherry….CB 120061 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants permission to Northwest Kidney Center to continue to operate and maintain a pedestrian tunnel under and across Broadway, north of Cherry….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126346May 28, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting permission to Northwest Kidney Center to continue to operate and maintain a pedestrian tunnel under and across Broadway, north of Cherry Street; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 123367; and providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $8,720. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants BGO Plaza 600 JV LLC permission to continue maintaining and operating a vehicular and pedestrian tunnel under the alley between 6th….CB 120075 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants BGO Plaza 600 JV LLC permission to continue maintaining and operating a vehicular and pedestrian tunnel under the alley between 6th….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126352May 28, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting BGO Plaza 600 JV LLC permission to continue maintaining and operating a vehicular and pedestrian tunnel under the alley between 6th Avenue and 7th Avenue, north of Stewart Street; repealing Section 7 of Ordinance 119508; and providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $8,816. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants IC/RCDP Seattle Hotel, LLC permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian tunnel under and across Seneca Street, between 4th Avenue….CB 120076 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants IC/RCDP Seattle Hotel, LLC permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian tunnel under and across Seneca Street, between 4th Avenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126349May 28, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting IC/RCDP Seattle Hotel, LLC permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian tunnel under and across Seneca Street, between 4th Avenue and 5th Avenue; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 123539; and providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $16,368. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Skagit County for the transfer….CB 120052 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Skagit County for the transfer….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126343May 28, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Skagit County for the transfer of real property from Skagit County to The City of Seattle, to execute conveyance documents and agreements deemed necessary for the transfer of the property on behalf of The City of Seattle, and to accept a Quit Claim Deed from Skagit County for such property; and placing the conveyed property under the jurisdiction of City Light as part of its Endangered Species Act Land Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120065 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPoliceBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126353May 28, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to emergency communications; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; transferring positions from the Seattle Police Department to the Community Safety and Communications Center; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2020 surveillance impact report and 2020 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120053 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2020 surveillance impact report and 2020 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126341May 28, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2020 surveillance impact report and 2020 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Forward Looking Infrared Real-Time Video.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2020 surveillance impact report and 2020 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120054 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2020 surveillance impact report and 2020 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126344May 28, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2020 surveillance impact report and 2020 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Situational Awareness Cameras Without Recording.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2020 surveillance impact report and 2020 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….CB 120055 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2020 surveillance impact report and 2020 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126345May 28, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2020 surveillance impact report and 2020 executive overview for the Seattle Police Department’s use of Video Recording Systems.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126066.CB 120071 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126066.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126347May 28, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to commercial tenancies; amending Ordinance 126066.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) to transfer excess property around the Air Route Surveillance Radar facility at Discovery Park to The….Res 32006 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) to transfer excess property around the Air Route Surveillance Radar facility at Discovery Park to The….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 28, 2021
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) to transfer excess property around the Air Route Surveillance Radar facility at Discovery Park to The City of Seattle for Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR) purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120078 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126350May 28, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to emergency communications; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; modifying a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2021-2023.CB 120101 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2021-2023.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126377June 25, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to housing for low-income households; adopting the Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2021-2023; adopting Housing Funding Policies for the 2016 Housing Levy and other fund sources; authorizing actions by the Director of Housing regarding past and future housing loans and contracts; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the name to the Board of Parks and Recreation Commissioners.CB 120098 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the name to the Board of Parks and Recreation Commissioners.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126380July 6, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Board of Park Commissioners; changing the name to the Board of Parks and Recreation Commissioners; requesting that the Code Reviser revise the Seattle Municipal Code accordingly; amending the Board’s composition and processes; authorizing an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Park District; and amending Sections 3.26.010 and 3.26.030 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager to execute a long-term lease and operating agreement with the Georgetown Steam Plant Community….CB 120103 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentHistoric PreservationElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager to execute a long-term lease and operating agreement with the Georgetown Steam Plant Community….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126386July 16, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentHistoric PreservationElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager to execute a long-term lease and operating agreement with the Georgetown Steam Plant Community Development Authority for the use and occupancy of the City's Georgetown Steam Plant property, a National Historic Landmark; allowing the Authority to assume regular public programming in the Georgetown Steam Plant for the purposes of historical interpretation as well as education in the areas of science, technology, education, arts, math, and related events, and also to provide continual general upkeep and stewardship of the Georgetown Steam Plant, including the addition of amenities enabling more and better community access.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Phone: CBO Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City Light Department, adopting a 2022-2026 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing the associated five-year rate….Res 32007 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City Light Department, adopting a 2022-2026 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing the associated five-year rate….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 16, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the City Light Department, adopting a 2022-2026 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing the associated five-year rate path.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an exchange of City-owned property at Walt Hundley Playfield for property owned by Seattle School District No. 1 adjacent to West….CB 120126 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an exchange of City-owned property at Walt Hundley Playfield for property owned by Seattle School District No. 1 adjacent to West….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126397July 30, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing an exchange of City-owned property at Walt Hundley Playfield for property owned by Seattle School District No. 1 adjacent to West Seattle Elementary School; authorizing execution, acceptance, and recording of quitclaim deeds; authorizing an interlocal agreement ensuring public outdoor recreation use of a portion of property deeded to Seattle Public Schools; and finding that the land exchange meets the requirements of Ordinance 118477, which adopted Initiative 42; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSPR. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….CB 120151 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransitProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126400August 9, 2021
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen, Andrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property lease with the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority for vacant land at 1000 NE 45th Street, Seattle, WA; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants ARE-SEATTLE NO. 33, LLC a permit to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade private utility lines under and across Roy Street, west….CB 120135 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants ARE-SEATTLE NO. 33, LLC a permit to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade private utility lines under and across Roy Street, west….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126415August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting ARE-SEATTLE NO. 33, LLC a permit to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade private utility lines under and across Roy Street, west of 8th Avenue North, and Dexter Avenue North, north of Mercer Street, for a 15-year term, renewable for one successive 15-year term; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $4,483. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Swedish Health Services permission to construct, maintain, and operate a pedestrian tunnel under and across Minor Avenue, south of Columbia Street….CB 120133 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Swedish Health Services permission to construct, maintain, and operate a pedestrian tunnel under and across Minor Avenue, south of Columbia Street….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126413August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Swedish Health Services permission to construct, maintain, and operate a pedestrian tunnel under and across Minor Avenue, south of Columbia Street and north of Cherry Street, for a 15-year term, renewable for one successive 15-year term; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $23,550. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a fund for depositing donations, gifts, and grants related to The City of Seattle’s response to homelessness and provision of human….CB 120109 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness ServicesHuman Services & Food Security Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creates a fund for depositing donations, gifts, and grants related to The City of Seattle’s response to homelessness and provision of human….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126404August 12, 2021
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesHuman Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City finances; creating a fund for depositing donations, gifts, and grants related to The City of Seattle’s response to homelessness and provision of human services.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Seattle Arena Company, LLC a permit to construct, maintain, and operate a tunnel under and across Thomas Street, east of 1st….CB 120139 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Seattle Arena Company, LLC a permit to construct, maintain, and operate a tunnel under and across Thomas Street, east of 1st….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126409August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Seattle Arena Company, LLC a permit to construct, maintain, and operate a tunnel under and across Thomas Street, east of 1st Avenue North and west of Warren Avenue North, and install permanently tensioned tie-backs in portions of Thomas Street, east of 1st Avenue North and west of 2nd Avenue North, for the life of the Climate Pledge Arena building lease; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,021. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Naming the pedestrian and bicycle bridge across Interstate 5, connecting N 100th St to 1st Ave NE, as the John Lewis Memorial….CB 120145 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresTraffic Safety Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Naming the pedestrian and bicycle bridge across Interstate 5, connecting N 100th St to 1st Ave NE, as the John Lewis Memorial….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126412August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresTraffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE naming the pedestrian and bicycle bridge across Interstate 5, connecting N 100th St to 1st Ave NE, as the John Lewis Memorial Bridge.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislature. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Beeson, Brecht, Chen, Crosson, Fresonke, Judd, Marsall, McElfresh (two properties), Metzler and De Llaguno, and Rasmussen….CB 120146 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Beeson, Brecht, Chen, Crosson, Fresonke, Judd, Marsall, McElfresh (two properties), Metzler and De Llaguno, and Rasmussen….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126417August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting statutory warranty deeds to the Beeson, Brecht, Chen, Crosson, Fresonke, Judd, Marsall, McElfresh (two properties), Metzler and De Llaguno, and Rasmussen properties in Skagit County, Washington, and the Ring Family Limited Partnership property in Snohomish County, all for salmonid habitat protection purposes; declaring certain real property rights surplus and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purposes, and ratifying the grants of Deeds of Right to the State of Washington on the Beeson, Brecht, Chen, Fresonke, Judd, Marblemount LLC, McElfresh properties, and Rasmussen for salmon recovery and conservation purposes; placing said lands under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $624,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
To initiate a 15th Avenue East Business Improvement Area.Res 32013 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

To initiate a 15th Avenue East Business Improvement Area.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION to initiate a 15th Avenue East Business Improvement Area.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedEconomic Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.CB 120148 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPoliceBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126420August 18, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to parking enforcement; amending Ordinance 126237, which adopted the 2021 Budget; transferring positions out of the Seattle Police Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports the creation of a United States Truth and Healing Commission on Indian Boarding Schools and other actions to address the lasting….Res 32018 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports the creation of a United States Truth and Healing Commission on Indian Boarding Schools and other actions to address the lasting….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 18, 2021
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting the creation of a United States Truth and Healing Commission on Indian Boarding Schools and other actions to address the lasting harm of Indian boarding schools.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….CB 120165 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126423September 14, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property lease with the Port of Seattle for vacant land known as the Tsubota Property; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a revised framework document that includes performance standards and access management strategies to be included and detailed within in an annual….Res 32016 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a revised framework document that includes performance standards and access management strategies to be included and detailed within in an annual….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 20, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the University of Washington Husky Stadium Transportation Management Plan; approving a revised framework document that includes performance standards and access management strategies to be included and detailed within in an annual operating plan for certain events at the stadium; and superseding Resolution 27435.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $64,260. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants permission to the Board of Regents of the University of Washington to continue to operate and maintain an existing underground pedestrian….CB 120174 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants permission to the Board of Regents of the University of Washington to continue to operate and maintain an existing underground pedestrian….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126439September 27, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting permission to the Board of Regents of the University of Washington to continue to operate and maintain an existing underground pedestrian concourse tunnel under and across 6th Avenue, north of University Street; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 123793; and providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $32,736. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to execute agreements under RCW 70A.140.040 for projects and programs that prevent water pollution using green stormwater infrastructure….CB 120175 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPollution & Environmental HealthWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to execute agreements under RCW 70A.140.040 for projects and programs that prevent water pollution using green stormwater infrastructure….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126441September 27, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Pollution & Environmental HealthWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing Seattle Public Utilities to execute agreements under RCW 70A.140.040 for projects and programs that prevent water pollution using green stormwater infrastructure and other nature-based approaches.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Calling for research, engagement and presentation of information to the Mayor and City Council on the Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) program prior….Res 32017 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Calling for research, engagement and presentation of information to the Mayor and City Council on the Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) program prior….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 27, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for research, engagement and presentation of information to the Mayor and City Council on the Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) program prior to considering renewal of the program in 2023.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the civil service system.CB 120172 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126436September 27, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Third Quarter 2021 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the civil service system; and amending classification titles.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Fire Department’s use of Emergency Scene Cameras and Hazardous Materials….CB 120171 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMSTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Fire Department’s use of Emergency Scene Cameras and Hazardous Materials….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126442September 27, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Fire Department’s use of Emergency Scene Cameras and Hazardous Materials Cameras.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSFD / ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a new 15th Avenue East Business Improvement Area (BIA).CB 120162 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a new 15th Avenue East Business Improvement Area (BIA).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126446October 1, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing a new 15th Avenue East Business Improvement Area (BIA); levying special assessments upon owners of commercial property, multi-family residential property, and mixed-use property within the area; providing for the deposit of revenues in a special account and expenditures therefrom; providing for collection of and penalties for delinquencies; providing for the establishment of a BIA Advisory Board; providing for an implementation agreement with a Program Manager; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $116,839. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedEconomic Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares that the investigation, arrest, and prosecution of anyone engaging in entheogen-related activities should be among The City of Seattle’s lowest law….Res 32021 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Declares that the investigation, arrest, and prosecution of anyone engaging in entheogen-related activities should be among The City of Seattle’s lowest law….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 6, 2021
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring that the investigation, arrest, and prosecution of anyone engaging in entheogen-related activities should be among The City of Seattle’s lowest law enforcement priorities and stating the Council’s support for full decriminalization of these activities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2021 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.CB 120154 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2021 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126457October 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2021 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development (OPCD). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Comprehensive Plan to change the name of Single Family areas to Neighborhood Residential areas as part of the 2020-2021 Comprehensive….CB 120155 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending the Comprehensive Plan to change the name of Single Family areas to Neighborhood Residential areas as part of the 2020-2021 Comprehensive….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126456October 15, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Dan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Comprehensive Plan to change the name of Single Family areas to Neighborhood Residential areas as part of the 2020-2021 Comprehensive Plan amendment process.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Request that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness.SLI HOM-018-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Request that OH and SDCI report on the Notice of Intent to Sell policy and program development.SLI OH-004-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OH and SDCI report on the Notice of Intent to Sell policy and program development.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OH and SDCI report on the Notice of Intent to Sell policy and program development

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OSE and SPR develop a plan to phase out the use of gas-powered leaf blowers.SLI OSE-003-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OSE and SPR develop a plan to phase out the use of gas-powered leaf blowers.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OSE and SPR develop a plan to phase out the use of gas-powered leaf blowers

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Concerning the health, well-being, and safety of domestic workers.Res 32028 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Concerning the health, well-being, and safety of domestic workers.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 22, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION concerning the health, well-being, and safety of domestic workers; expressing Council’s intent to establish a right to portable Paid Time Off (PTO) for domestic workers in Seattle; and requesting the Office of Labor Standards to work with community stakeholders to draft legislation creating a portable PTO policy for domestic workers.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the Mayoral Civil Emergency Order of October 29, 2021, related to hiring incentives for public safety emergency response.Res 32027 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originEmergency Management Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Modifies the Mayoral Civil Emergency Order of October 29, 2021, related to hiring incentives for public safety emergency response.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 22, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Emergency Management
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION modifying the Mayoral Civil Emergency Order of October 29, 2021, related to hiring incentives for public safety emergency response.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….CB 120210 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126468December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to negotiate and execute a real property lease renewal with the United States Army for The City of Seattle’s continued interim use and occupancy of 33.95 acres at the Fort Lawton Army Reserve Center; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2022.CB 120211 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2022.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126490December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2022; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Closing certain funds, subfunds, and accounts.CB 120201 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Closing certain funds, subfunds, and accounts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126485December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City funds; closing certain funds, subfunds, and accounts; authorizing the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to take action pursuant to those closures; authorizing the transfer of all unexpended and unencumbered balances and other assets and liabilities of those funds, subfunds, and accounts; and abandoning appropriation authority from those funds, subfunds, and accounts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $120,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Creates a new Fund in the City Treasury.CB 120200 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a new Fund in the City Treasury.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126484December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Office of Housing; creating a new Fund in the City Treasury.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2022.Res 32022 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2022.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2022.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolution 31334.Res 32023 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31334.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31334; establishing the City Council’s intent to fund the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) as informed by the January 1, 2021, Actuarial Study.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the 2022 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.CB 120192 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the 2022 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126475December 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; establishing the 2022 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services; and superseding previous park and recreation fee schedules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests King County and the State of Washington to increase services to address behavioral health conditions.Res 32026 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originBehavioral Health Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests King County and the State of Washington to increase services to address behavioral health conditions.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 2, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Behavioral Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting King County and the State of Washington to increase services to address behavioral health conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the name of the portion of Thomas St between 1st Ave N and 2nd Ave N to Lenny Wilkens Way.CB 120236 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the name of the portion of Thomas St between 1st Ave N and 2nd Ave N to Lenny Wilkens Way.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126499December 10, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City streets; changing the name of the portion of Thomas St between 1st Ave N and 2nd Ave N to Lenny Wilkens Way; and superseding the relevant portions of Ordinance 4044, Ordinance 89910, Ordinance 102981, and any other ordinance to the extent inconsistent; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of an agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle Fire Chiefs Association, International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF)….CB 120231 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of an agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle Fire Chiefs Association, International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF)….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126500December 10, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of an agreement between The City of Seattle and Seattle Fire Chiefs Association, International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) Local 2898; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1,750. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating positions as exempt from the civil service system.CB 120237 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126501December 10, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Fourth Quarter 2021 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from the civil service system; and returning positions to the civil service system; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 32029 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 13, 2021
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; superseding Resolution 31920.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,021. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the efforts of the Crown Hill community to prepare an action plan for their community.Res 32035 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Recognizing the efforts of the Crown Hill community to prepare an action plan for their community.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 13, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the efforts of the Crown Hill community to prepare an action plan for their community; and identifying strategies and actions to implement the Crown Hill Urban Village Action Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ratifying the 2021 Update to the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed or Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA 9) Salmon Habitat Plan….Res 32031 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

ratifying the 2021 Update to the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed or Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA 9) Salmon Habitat Plan….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION ratifying the 2021 Update to the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed or Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA 9) Salmon Habitat Plan, Making Our Watershed Fit for a King.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a compensation program for the position of Fire Chief.CB 120248 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a compensation program for the position of Fire Chief.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126513December 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; creating a compensation program for the position of Fire Chief; specifying provisions for the administration of said compensation program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2022 State Legislative Agenda.Res 32032 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2022 State Legislative Agenda.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 15, 2021
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2022 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts the pay zone structures for 2022 for the City’s discretionary pay programs.CB 120244 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originZoningCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts the pay zone structures for 2022 for the City’s discretionary pay programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126504December 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, to be known as the 2022 Pay Zone Ordinance; adjusting the pay zone structures for 2022 for the City’s discretionary pay programs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Superseding Resolution 31883.Res 31922 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Superseding Resolution 31883.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 6, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2020 and 2021; and superseding Resolution 31883.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Superseding Resolution 31885.Res 31923 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Superseding Resolution 31885.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 6, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2020 and 2021, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 31885.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2020-2021 and superseding Resolution 31884.Res 31924 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2020-2021 and superseding Resolution 31884.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 6, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2020-2021 and superseding Resolution 31884.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 9, 2019 through December 13, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119728 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 9, 2019 through December 13, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126030January 10, 2020
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 9, 2019 through December 13, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 16, 2019 through December 20, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119729 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 16, 2019 through December 20, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126031January 10, 2020
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 16, 2019 through December 20, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain in audited claims for the week of December 23, 2019 through December 27, 2019 and ordering the….CB 119733 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain in audited claims for the week of December 23, 2019 through December 27, 2019 and ordering the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126032January 10, 2020
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain in audited claims for the week of December 23, 2019 through December 27, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 30, 2019 through January 3, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119734 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 30, 2019 through January 3, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126034January 17, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 30, 2019 through January 3, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Superseding Resolution 31923.Res 31927 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Superseding Resolution 31923.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 21, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2020 and 2021, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 31923.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 6, 2020 through January 10, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119735 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 6, 2020 through January 10, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126037January 24, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 6, 2020 through January 10, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 13, 2019 through January 17, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119736 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 13, 2019 through January 17, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126038January 31, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 13, 2019 through January 17, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 20, 2020 through January 24, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119737 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 20, 2020 through January 24, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126039February 7, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 20, 2020 through January 24, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the City's good faith intent to consider raising in the collective bargaining process for the Seattle Police Officer’s Guild (SPOG) 2021….Res 31930 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originPoliceCollective BargainingGovernment Accountability Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Affirming the City's good faith intent to consider raising in the collective bargaining process for the Seattle Police Officer’s Guild (SPOG) 2021….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 20, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceCollective BargainingGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming the City's good faith intent to consider raising in the collective bargaining process for the Seattle Police Officer’s Guild (SPOG) 2021 contract renewal police accountability proposals that have been identified by the public and the City’s police oversight agencies.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 27, 2020 through January 31, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119738 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 27, 2020 through January 31, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126040February 24, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of January 27, 2020 through January 31, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of the City of Seattle, 11 catchment….CB 119744 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of the City of Seattle, 11 catchment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126045February 28, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Transportation’s Hazard Mitigation Program; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of the City of Seattle, 11 catchment wall easements (From Daniel Bayeh, located in a portion of Lots 10 and 11, Block 3, Sturtevant’s Rainier Beach Lake Front Tracts; a catchment wall easement from Blue Bird Rentals, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, located in a portion of Lots 14 through 17, Block 46, Rainier Beach; a catchment wall easement from Margaret Brown, located in a portion of Lots 17 and 18, Block 46, Rainier Beach; a catchment wall easement from Dan J. Del Duca and Mary F. Del Duca, located in a portion of Lots 1 and 2, Block 35, Rainier Beach; a catchment wall easement from Paul J. Farrington and Ronald F. Minter, located in Lots 5 and 6, Block 2, Mayes' Addition to the City of Seattle; a catchment wall easement from Mark Duane Lewis, located in a portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 2, Mayes' Addition to the City of Seattle; a catchment wall easement from Gene Louie and Lena T. Louie, located in a portion of Lots 3 through 5, Block 2, Mayes' Addition to the City of Seattle; a catchment wall easement from Lincoln A. Louie and Ann Marie D. Louie, located in a portion of Lots 3 through 5, Block 35, Rainier Beach; a catchment wall easement from Robert Miller and Ana Miller, located in a portion of Lots 11 and 12, Block 3, Sturtevant’s Rainier Beach Lake Front Tracts; a catchment wall easement from Ngoc Nguyen and My Chau Tran, located in a portion of Lots 9 and 10, Block 3, Sturtevant’s Rainier Beach Lake Front Tracts; a catchment wall easement from F. D. Staats, the Trustee of the F. D. Staats Family Trust, located in a portion of Lots 6 and 7, Block 35, Rainier Beach), for the purpose of protecting the adjacent roadway of superficial surface erosion of the adjacent slopes along a portion of Rainier Avenue South; placing the real property rights under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2020 calendar year.Res 31931 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2020 calendar year.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 28, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2020 calendar year.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,020. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 3, 2020 through February 7, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119740 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 3, 2020 through February 7, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126043February 28, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 3, 2020 through February 7, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 10, 2020 through February 14, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119747 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 10, 2020 through February 14, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126044February 28, 2020
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 10, 2020 through February 14, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2020 Adopted Budget and 2020-2025 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.Res 31936 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts the Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2020 Adopted Budget and 2020-2025 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2020 Adopted Budget and 2020-2025 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,020. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2020 Work Program.Res 31935 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts the Seattle City Council 2020 Work Program.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2020 Work Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,020. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 17, 2020 through February 21, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119751 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 17, 2020 through February 21, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126049March 5, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 17, 2020 through February 21, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the March 3, 2020 Mayoral Proclamation of Civil Emergency related to the spread of COVID-19, novel coronavirus.Res 31937 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Modifies the March 3, 2020 Mayoral Proclamation of Civil Emergency related to the spread of COVID-19, novel coronavirus.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 5, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION modifying the March 3, 2020 Mayoral Proclamation of Civil Emergency related to the spread of COVID-19, novel coronavirus.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Office of Arts and Culture to accept a specified donation and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding….CB 119739 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Office of Arts and Culture to accept a specified donation and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126054March 13, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to donation funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of the Office of Arts and Culture to accept a specified donation and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; changing appropriations to the Office of Arts & Culture; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $748,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Office of Arts & Culture (ARTS). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 24, 2020 through February 28, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119753 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 24, 2020 through February 28, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126052March 13, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of February 24, 2020 through February 28, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Modifies the March 14, 2020 emergency order relating to residential evictions.Res 31938 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Modifies the March 14, 2020 emergency order relating to residential evictions.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 16, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION modifying the March 14, 2020 emergency order relating to residential evictions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 2, 2020 through March 6, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119755 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 2, 2020 through March 6, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126055March 18, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 2, 2020 through March 6, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 9, 2020 through March 13, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119759 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 9, 2020 through March 13, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126059March 24, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 9, 2020 through March 13, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 16, 2020 through March 20, 2020 and ordering the payment….CB 119765 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 16, 2020 through March 20, 2020 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126061April 1, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of March 16, 2020 through March 20, 2020 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adding the West Seattle Bridge emergency closure and repairs to the Watch List of capital projects for enhanced quarterly monitoring established in….Res 31942 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & Structures Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adding the West Seattle Bridge emergency closure and repairs to the Watch List of capital projects for enhanced quarterly monitoring established in….

OutcomeAdoptedApril 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Alex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adding the West Seattle Bridge emergency closure and repairs to the Watch List of capital projects for enhanced quarterly monitoring established in Resolution 31931.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislature. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a committee to develop recommendations to enhance the capacity of the Office of City Auditor to conduct performance audits.Res 31941 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a committee to develop recommendations to enhance the capacity of the Office of City Auditor to conduct performance audits.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 6, 2020
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a committee to develop recommendations to enhance the capacity of the Office of City Auditor to conduct performance audits.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily restricting increases in commercial rents.CB 119766 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Temporarily restricting increases in commercial rents.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126066April 17, 2020
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Tammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to commercial tenancies; temporarily restricting increases in commercial rents; authorizing repayment of late rent in installments for small businesses and nonprofits; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807 to provide for emergency childcare services.CB 119771 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807 to provide for emergency childcare services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126067April 17, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2018 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy; amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807 to provide for emergency childcare services; ratifying and confirming the Mayor’s Civil Emergency Order - Emergency Childcare Services for Front-line Essential Workers; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDEEL. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
To initiate a University District Business Improvement Area.Res 31943 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

To initiate a University District Business Improvement Area.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 27, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION to initiate a University District Business Improvement Area.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedEconomic Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the April 24, 2020, emergency order relating to capping restaurant delivery and pick-up commission fees.Res 31945 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Modifies the April 24, 2020, emergency order relating to capping restaurant delivery and pick-up commission fees.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 27, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION modifying the April 24, 2020, emergency order relating to capping restaurant delivery and pick-up commission fees.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to negotiate and execute a real property lease with Epic Life Church, for a….CB 119780 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to negotiate and execute a real property lease with Epic Life Church, for a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126076May 6, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to negotiate and execute a real property lease with Epic Life Church, for a site located at 10503 Interlake Avenue N; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Allowing residential tenants to pay rent in installments when the tenant is unable to timely pay rent.CB 119788 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Allowing residential tenants to pay rent in installments when the tenant is unable to timely pay rent.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126081May 15, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to residential rental agreements; allowing residential tenants to pay rent in installments when the tenant is unable to timely pay rent; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Allowing for suspension of standing committee meetings for consideration of a Revised 2020 Budget due to the COVID-19 Emergency declared March 3….Res 31947 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Allowing for suspension of standing committee meetings for consideration of a Revised 2020 Budget due to the COVID-19 Emergency declared March 3….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 8, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2020 and 2021; allowing for suspension of standing committee meetings for consideration of a Revised 2020 Budget due to the COVID-19 Emergency declared March 3, 2020; and superseding Resolution 31922.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Condemning the use of military force in jurisdictions such as The City of Seattle that have not requested and do not intend….Res 31948 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Condemning the use of military force in jurisdictions such as The City of Seattle that have not requested and do not intend….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 10, 2020
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION condemning the use of military force in jurisdictions such as The City of Seattle that have not requested and do not intend to request federal interventions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of a transfer of real property near the Mount Baker light rail station from the University of Washington for….CB 119802 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTransitAffordable HousingPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of a transfer of real property near the Mount Baker light rail station from the University of Washington for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126101June 26, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitAffordable HousingPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Office of Housing and the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the acceptance of a transfer of real property near the Mount Baker light rail station from the University of Washington for the purpose of development of affordable housing and other potential educational, research, and clinical uses by the University, including an early learning facility, and for general municipal purposes; placing the property under the jurisdiction of the Office of Housing; authorizing the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to take custodial management of the property, including leasing, collection of rents, payment of expenses, and other property management duties; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $250,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Temporarily prohibiting the enforcement of personal liability provisions in commercial leases or other rental agreements.CB 119829 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Temporarily prohibiting the enforcement of personal liability provisions in commercial leases or other rental agreements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126116July 31, 2020
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to commercial tenancies; temporarily prohibiting the enforcement of personal liability provisions in commercial leases or other rental agreements; declaring an emergency; and establishing an immediate effective date; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a Memorandum of Agreement with Seattle Central College regarding the establishment, composition, and rules for a Citizens Advisory Committee for preparation….Res 31959 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a Memorandum of Agreement with Seattle Central College regarding the establishment, composition, and rules for a Citizens Advisory Committee for preparation….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 5, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving a Memorandum of Agreement with Seattle Central College regarding the establishment, composition, and rules for a Citizens Advisory Committee for preparation of a Major Institution Master Plan for Seattle Central College.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Neighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a Memorandum of Agreement with Seattle Pacific University regarding the establishment, composition, and rules for a Citizens Advisory Committee for preparation….Res 31958 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a Memorandum of Agreement with Seattle Pacific University regarding the establishment, composition, and rules for a Citizens Advisory Committee for preparation….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 5, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving a Memorandum of Agreement with Seattle Pacific University regarding the establishment, composition, and rules for a Citizens Advisory Committee for preparation of a Major Institution Master Plan for Seattle Pacific University.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the City Council’s goal to implement Internet for All Seattle, a vision of enabling all Seattle residents to access and adopt….Res 31956 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes the City Council’s goal to implement Internet for All Seattle, a vision of enabling all Seattle residents to access and adopt….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 5, 2020
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing the City Council’s goal to implement Internet for All Seattle, a vision of enabling all Seattle residents to access and adopt broadband internet service that is reliable and affordable.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the Council’s intent to create a civilian-led Department of Community Safety & Violence Prevention.Res 31962 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes the Council’s intent to create a civilian-led Department of Community Safety & Violence Prevention.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 10, 2020
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to policing and public safety; establishing the Council’s intent to create a civilian-led Department of Community Safety & Violence Prevention; identifying actions in 2020 to remove certain functions from the Seattle Police Department and provide funding for a community-led process to inform the structure and function of the new department; requesting modifications to policing practices; requesting reporting to the Council; providing guidance on layoff decisions; and establishing a work program and timeline for creating a new department.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.CB 119839 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsCivil Rights Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126121August 14, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsCivil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to appropriations for the Office for Civil Rights; amending Ordinance 126000, which adopted the 2020 Budget; and lifting provisos.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $170,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2020 (H.R. 7120).Res 31963 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2020 (H.R. 7120).

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2020
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2020 (H.R. 7120).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLeg. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating portions of the alleys in Block 3, Norris Addition to West Seattle, in the West Seattle Junction and accepting a Property….CB 119742 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating portions of the alleys in Block 3, Norris Addition to West Seattle, in the West Seattle Junction and accepting a Property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126133August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating portions of the alleys in Block 3, Norris Addition to West Seattle, in the West Seattle Junction and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement on the petition of The Whittaker, a Condominium Association, a Washington non-profit corporation (Clerk File 312783).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Onni DEU (John Street) LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate a below-grade private thermal energy exchange system under and across….CB 119845 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Onni DEU (John Street) LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate a below-grade private thermal energy exchange system under and across….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126135August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Onni DEU (John Street) LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate a below-grade private thermal energy exchange system under and across John Street, east of Boren Avenue and west of Fairview Avenue North, for a 15-year term, renewable for one successive 15-year term; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,900. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Stating intent that the City will consider a one-year budget proposal for 2021 only.Res 31954 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Stating intent that the City will consider a one-year budget proposal for 2021 only.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City’s annual budget process; stating intent that the City will consider a one-year budget proposal for 2021 only; and superseding Resolution 28885 to the extent inconsistent.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts revised financial policies for the Cumulative Reserve Subfund of the General Fund.Res 31952 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts revised financial policies for the Cumulative Reserve Subfund of the General Fund.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting revised financial policies for the Cumulative Reserve Subfund of the General Fund; and superseding Attachment B to Resolution 31848.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle a Quit….CB 119850 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle a Quit….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126137August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Transportation; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle a Quit Claim Deed from King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, located in a portion of Block B, Supplementary Plat of Edes and Knight’s Addition to the City of Seattle, a portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 32, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, a portion of Block 1, Ross Home Addition, and a portion of Block 48, Yesler’s 2nd Addition (Supplemental) to the City of Seattle; designating the property for street purposes and laying it off as right-of-way; placing the property under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $9,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119853 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126140August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights of way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the alley in Block 5, Sorenson’s Addition to the City of Seattle; Eastlake Avenue East abutting Block 8, T. J. Carle’s Supplemental Plat of Block Eight of D. T. Denny’s 2nd Addition of North Seattle; Klickitat Avenue Southwest abutting Block 408, Seattle Tidelands; Klickitat Avenue Southwest, 13th Avenue Southwest, and 16th Avenue Southwest abutting Block 401, Seattle Tide Lands; the alley in Block 5, Sorenson’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 29, Town of Seattle, as laid out by D. S. Maynard, Commonly known as D. S. Maynard’s Plat of Seattle; the alley in Block 10, Greenwood Park Add. to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 33, South Park; the alley in Block "L", Bell’s 5th Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 12, Cowen’s University Park; the alley in Block 5, South Park, the alley in Block 10, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 12, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 7, Gilman Park; the alley in Block 7, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 2, Capitol Hill Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1; the alley in Block 12, Empire Way Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Parcels C, D, & E, City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 3003381, recorded under King County Recording Number 20071126900008, previously known as Block 11, Denny’s Addition to Ballard and Seattle; and the alley in Block 32, South Park.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119854 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126141August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights of way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: 41st Avenue Northeast abutting the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; the alley in Block 95, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 57, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell, (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 12, North Seattle; the alley in Block 4, White Center; the alley in Block 5, University Heights; the alley in Block 6, Ross Second Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 39, Central Seattle; South Holgate Street abutting a portion of Jeffrey’s Replat of Block 13 Jos. C. Kinnear’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in a portion of Lot 25, Wilson’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 2, Norris' Addition to West Seattle; the alley in Block 5, Burke & Farrar’s Fifth Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 44, Central Seattle; 16th Avenue Southwest abutting Block 406, Seattle Tide Lands, together with a portion of vacated Southwest Hanford Street; and Klickitat Avenue Southwest abutting Block 408, Seattle Tide Lands.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Sponsoring and requesting the entrance of the King County Regional Homelessness Authority into the Association of Washington Cities Employee Benefit Trust.Res 31964 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originHomelessness ServicesCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sponsoring and requesting the entrance of the King County Regional Homelessness Authority into the Association of Washington Cities Employee Benefit Trust.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 21, 2020
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION sponsoring and requesting the entrance of the King County Regional Homelessness Authority into the Association of Washington Cities Employee Benefit Trust.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a restricted cash account for depositing donations and gifts.CB 119866 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a restricted cash account for depositing donations and gifts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126163September 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; creating a restricted cash account for depositing donations and gifts; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept donations and gifts into the account for the purpose of providing financial assistance to its low-income customers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $28,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expanding the requirements for the Summary and Fiscal Note that accompanies new legislation so that it also considers impacts of climate change.Res 31933 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originClimate Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Expanding the requirements for the Summary and Fiscal Note that accompanies new legislation so that it also considers impacts of climate change.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 21, 2020
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Climate
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expanding the requirements for the Summary and Fiscal Note that accompanies new legislation so that it also considers impacts of climate change.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designees to execute an Agreement with Seattle Arena Company, LLC, to establish roles and responsibilities for….CB 119881 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originTransitTraffic SafetyProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor or the Mayor’s designees to execute an Agreement with Seattle Arena Company, LLC, to establish roles and responsibilities for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126170September 25, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitTraffic SafetyProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to renovating KeyArena at the Seattle Center; authorizing the Mayor or the Mayor’s designees to execute an Agreement with Seattle Arena Company, LLC, to establish roles and responsibilities for coordinating the design and constructing the transit-only lanes on Queen Anne Avenue North and 1st Avenue North, a transit queue jump at 1st Avenue North and Republican Street, design upgrades for the Protected Bicycle Lanes, and additional improvements to Thomas Street.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $841,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural….CB 119882 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPolicePermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126181October 2, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Alex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PolicePermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a waterway permit and three sequential waterway permits, for the Seattle Police Department’s Harbor Patrol use of Waterway 20.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $59,880. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2019-2020 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.CB 119838 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2019-2020 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126186October 2, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2019-2020 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers the jurisdiction of a 1-foot strip of the property from the Office of Housing to the Department of Transportation for right-of-way….CB 119890 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentTrees & Habitat Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers the jurisdiction of a 1-foot strip of the property from the Office of Housing to the Department of Transportation for right-of-way….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126185October 2, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentTrees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the transfer of City real property for housing development; transferring the jurisdiction of a 1-foot strip of the property from the Office of Housing to the Department of Transportation for right-of-way purposes; declaring the remaining property located at 7750 28th Avenue NW (“Loyal Heights Property”) surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing transfer of the Loyal Heights Property to Habitat for Humanity or its designee; authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing or the Director’s designee to execute and deliver a contract for transfer of land, deed, and related documents; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $630,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a Transportation Electrification Strategic Investment Plan for the City Light Department that will guide the development of the utility’s infrastructure strategy….Res 31971 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a Transportation Electrification Strategic Investment Plan for the City Light Department that will guide the development of the utility’s infrastructure strategy….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 8, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; adopting a Transportation Electrification Strategic Investment Plan for the City Light Department that will guide the development of the utility’s infrastructure strategy and investment priorities related to the electrification of transportation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Returning positions to the civil service system.CB 119903 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Returning positions to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126193October 8, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Third Quarter 2020 Employment Ordinance; returning positions to the civil service system; and establishing a new title and corresponding rate of pay; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a 99 year lease agreement with Africatown Community….CB 119905 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a 99 year lease agreement with Africatown Community….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126203November 10, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the lease of City property; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a 99 year lease agreement with Africatown Community Land Trust for former Fire Station 6 located at 101 23rd Ave, Seattle, WA 98122, for use as the William Grose Center for Cultural Innovation to provide for culturally responsive services that support the African-American community in the Central Area to create pathways to self-determination, and for future development and expanded activation of the property as described in the lease.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $14,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Planning and Community Development. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Request that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness.SLI HOM-020-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2020
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD provide a quarterly report on activities responding to unsheltered homelessness

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Provides for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding water system revenue bonds and payment of….CB 119926 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding water system revenue bonds and payment of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126226December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; providing for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding water system revenue bonds and payment of the administrative costs of such defeasance; providing for and authorizing the purchase of certain obligations and for the use and application of the money derived from those investments; authorizing the execution of a defeasance trust agreement to establish a defeasance escrow; authorizing the call for redemption prior to their maturity of those outstanding bonds that are to be defeased; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding solid waste system revenue bonds and payment….CB 119924 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid WasteTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding solid waste system revenue bonds and payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126224December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the solid waste system of The City of Seattle; providing for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding solid waste system revenue bonds and payment of the administrative costs of such defeasance; providing for and authorizing the purchase of certain obligations and for the use and application of the money derived from those investments; authorizing the execution of a defeasance trust agreement to establish a defeasance escrow; authorizing the call for redemption prior to their maturity of those outstanding bonds that are to be defeased; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding drainage and wastewater system revenue bonds and….CB 119923 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding drainage and wastewater system revenue bonds and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126223December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the drainage and wastewater system of The City of Seattle; providing for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding drainage and wastewater system revenue bonds and payment of the administrative costs of such defeasance; providing for and authorizing the purchase of certain obligations and for the use and application of the money derived from those investments; authorizing the execution of a defeasance trust agreement to establish a defeasance escrow; authorizing the call for redemption prior to their maturity of those outstanding bonds that are to be defeased; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding electric system revenue bonds and payment of….CB 119920 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding electric system revenue bonds and payment of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126220December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the electric system of The City of Seattle; providing for the defeasance of the claim or lien of certain of the City’s outstanding electric system revenue bonds and payment of the administrative costs of such defeasance; providing for and authorizing the purchase of certain obligations and for the use and application of the money derived from those investments; authorizing the execution of a defeasance trust agreement to establish a defeasance escrow; authorizing the call for redemption prior to their maturity of those outstanding bonds that are to be defeased; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies financial policies for the Arts and Culture Fund and superseding Resolution 31507.Res 31976 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies financial policies for the Arts and Culture Fund and superseding Resolution 31507.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION modifying financial policies for the Arts and Culture Fund and superseding Resolution 31507.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolution 31334.Res 31978 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31334.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31334; establishing the City Council’s intent to fund the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) in accordance with the January 1, 2020 Actuarial Study.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2021.Res 31977 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2021.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2021.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedRET. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2021.CB 119938 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2021.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126237December 1, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2021; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Grants conceptual approval to construct, install, maintain, and operate below-grade private utility lines under and across Roy Street, west of 8th Avenue….Res 31980 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval to construct, install, maintain, and operate below-grade private utility lines under and across Roy Street, west of 8th Avenue….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to construct, install, maintain, and operate below-grade private utility lines under and across Roy Street, west of 8th Avenue N; Dexter Avenue N, north of Mercer Street; Roy Street, west of Dexter Avenue N; and the alley north of Mercer Street, west of Dexter Avenue N, south of Roy Street, and east of Aurora Avenue N, as proposed by McKinstry Company LLC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an agreement with King County Fire Protection District 40 for fire protection….CB 119956 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMSWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an agreement with King County Fire Protection District 40 for fire protection….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126247December 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an agreement with King County Fire Protection District 40 for fire protection and emergency medical services for certain City of Seattle water system properties in King County, Washington.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $40,600. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 119954 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126246December 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 119953 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126245December 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City….CB 119961 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126248December 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityWater & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle both temporary and permanent property rights from owners of property located along the alignment of the planned combined sewage conveyance and storage tunnel between 24th Avenue NW and Shilshole Avenue NW in Ballard and Interlake Avenue N and N 35th Street in Wallingford, and from owners of property located along the alignment of the planned Ballard Conveyance pipeline between 28th Avenue NW and NW 56th Street and 24th Avenue NW and Shilshole Avenue NW, and for related infrastructure in 28th Avenue NW, that are necessary or convenient to construct, operate, and maintain the Ship Canal Water Quality Project and 3rd Avenue W Water Main Replacement Project, through negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation); placing an underground electrical easement under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; placing other real property rights acquired under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; designating the property rights acquired for utility and general municipal purposes; authorizing termination of an easement held by the former Milwaukee Terminal Railway Company or its successors; authorizing payment of all other costs associated with acquisition; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a stormwater facility construction and maintenance agreement….CB 119962 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a stormwater facility construction and maintenance agreement….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126249December 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a stormwater facility construction and maintenance agreement with the State of Washington and grant a non-exclusive easement to the State of Washington for the stormwater facility, upon, under, and across a portion of the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,100. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing the Seattle City Council’s solidarity with farmers protesting the passage of farming bills in India and in support of affected members….Res 31983 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Expressing the Seattle City Council’s solidarity with farmers protesting the passage of farming bills in India and in support of affected members….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 14, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Kshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the Seattle City Council’s solidarity with farmers protesting the passage of farming bills in India and in support of affected members of Seattle’s South Asian community.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807 to grant the Department of Education and Early Learning temporary authority….CB 119967 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807 to grant the Department of Education and Early Learning temporary authority….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126259December 16, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2018 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy; amending the levy implementation and evaluation plan adopted by Ordinance 125807 to grant the Department of Education and Early Learning temporary authority to modify the implementation and evaluation plan in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Education & Early Learning. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2021 State Legislative Agenda.Res 31982 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2021 State Legislative Agenda.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 22, 2020
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2021 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Allowing for temporarily changing the committee meeting times.Res 31859 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Allowing for temporarily changing the committee meeting times.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 7, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien, Bruce Harrell
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2018 and 2019; allowing for temporarily changing the committee meeting times; and superseding Resolution 31789.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the name of the portion of NW 113th Street between 1st Avenue NW and 2nd Avenue NW to NW 112th Place.CB 119415 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the name of the portion of NW 113th Street between 1st Avenue NW and 2nd Avenue NW to NW 112th Place.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125753January 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City streets; changing the name of the portion of NW 113th Street between 1st Avenue NW and 2nd Avenue NW to NW 112th Place; naming the alley in Blocks 52, 53, and 54, D. S. Maynard’s Plat of Seattle, as Canton Alley S; naming the alley in Blocks 48, 49, 50, and 51, D. S. Maynard’s Plat of Seattle, as Maynard Alley S; and superseding Ordinance 102981 to the extent inconsistent.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a….CB 119417 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksElectricityYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125755January 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksElectricityYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the South Lander Street Grade Separation project; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a warranty deed from the Seattle School District No. 1, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, located in a portion of Blocks 291, 294, and 316 of the unrecorded plat of Seattle Tide Lands, also known as Parcel D, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 2207829, recorded under King County Recording Number 20040527900005; a warranty deed from The Bailey Family Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, located in a portion of Lot 1, Block 296, Plat of Seattle Tidelands; a warranty deed from PacWest Energy, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, located in a portion of Lot 11, Block 295, Plat of Seattle Tidelands, and a quit claim deed from Rabanco, Ltd., a Washington corporation, located in a portion of Lot 1, Block 297, Plat of Seattle Tidelands; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by such deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation and laying them off as right-of-way; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $58,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119435 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125749January 11, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119436 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125750January 11, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119438 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125751January 11, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119440 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125756January 18, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125706 to modify the effective date of that ordinance.CB 119441 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 125706 to modify the effective date of that ordinance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125759January 25, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125706 to modify the effective date of that ordinance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports the Seattle Public Schools’ Proposition 1 and Proposition 2 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Proposition 1 and Proposition….Res 31860 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports the Seattle Public Schools’ Proposition 1 and Proposition 2 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Proposition 1 and Proposition….

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 25, 2019
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting the Seattle Public Schools’ Proposition 1 and Proposition 2 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Proposition 1 and Proposition 2 on the February 12, 2019, special election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119442 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125758January 25, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the harms that evictions from housing have on tenants and marginalized communities and describing the City Council’s plan to help avoid….Res 31861 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Recognizing the harms that evictions from housing have on tenants and marginalized communities and describing the City Council’s plan to help avoid….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 4, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Mike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the harms that evictions from housing have on tenants and marginalized communities and describing the City Council’s plan to help avoid and mitigate those harms.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125733 to correct a clerical error regarding a condition of approval of the University of Washington’s 2018 Seattle Campus Master….CB 119453 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 125733 to correct a clerical error regarding a condition of approval of the University of Washington’s 2018 Seattle Campus Master….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125763February 6, 2019
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Ordinance 125733 to correct a clerical error regarding a condition of approval of the University of Washington’s 2018 Seattle Campus Master Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Council. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department.CB 119353 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125767February 8, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department; authorizing the sale of an easement for sidewalk purposes to Snohomish County; and accepting the payment of fair market value for the easement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Shu property in King County, Washington, the Bratager, Glaser, Goelz and Abelson, Ross, Smith and Cummins….CB 119354 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Shu property in King County, Washington, the Bratager, Glaser, Goelz and Abelson, Ross, Smith and Cummins….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125768February 8, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting statutory warranty deeds to the Shu property in King County, Washington, the Bratager, Glaser, Goelz and Abelson, Ross, Smith and Cummins, and Wejmar and Wiley properties in Skagit County, Washington, the Povlsen property in Snohomish County, Washington, and two treasurer’s deeds for two Skagit County properties in Skagit County, all for salmonid habitat protection purposes; declaring certain real property rights surplus and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purposes; ratifying the grants of deeds of right to the State of Washington on the Bratager, Glaser, Goelz and Abelson, and Ross properties for salmon recovery and conservation purposes; authorizing the grant of an easement for ingress and egress over the Povlsen property; placing said lands under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $365,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers partial jurisdiction of portions of park land and park boulevards within Discovery Park from the Department of Parks and Recreation to….CB 119446 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers partial jurisdiction of portions of park land and park boulevards within Discovery Park from the Department of Parks and Recreation to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125766February 8, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation and Seattle Public Utilities; transferring partial jurisdiction of portions of park land and park boulevards within Discovery Park from the Department of Parks and Recreation to Seattle Public Utilities for maintenance, repair, replacement, and operation of public water and sanitary sewer infrastructure, associated underground pipes, hydrants, and limited surface ancillary facilities; and finding that transfer of partial jurisdiction meets the requirements of Ordinance 118477, which adopted Initiative 42.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119452 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125765February 8, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the name of the portion of Aurora Avenue North between Denny Way and Harrison Street to 7th Avenue North, and changing….CB 119455 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the name of the portion of Aurora Avenue North between Denny Way and Harrison Street to 7th Avenue North, and changing….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125770February 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City streets; changing the name of the portion of Aurora Avenue North between Denny Way and Harrison Street to 7th Avenue North, and changing the name of the portion of Aurora Avenue between Battery Street and Denny Way to Borealis Avenue; and superseding prior ordinances to the extent inconsistent.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants National Railroad Passenger Corporation permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines under and across South Holgate Street, east of….CB 119456 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants National Railroad Passenger Corporation permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines under and across South Holgate Street, east of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125771February 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting National Railroad Passenger Corporation permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines under and across South Holgate Street, east of Occidental Avenue South and west of 3rd Avenue South; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119458 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125769February 13, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests semi-annual updates to the Council starting at the end of the 3rd quarter of 2019 on the work the Office of….Res 31863 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests semi-annual updates to the Council starting at the end of the 3rd quarter of 2019 on the work the Office of….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 19, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to misclassifications of workers as independent contractors when they should be designated as employees; requesting semi-annual updates to the Council starting at the end of the 3rd quarter of 2019 on the work the Office of Labor Standards and Labor Standards Advisory Commission is doing to investigate and correct misclassifications.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a lease with King County for its use of part of the….CB 119454 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a lease with King County for its use of part of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125777February 22, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s Myrtle reservoir radio-transmitter facility; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute a lease with King County for its use of part of the radio-transmitter facility for the new, regional Puget Sound Emergency Radio Network; declaring the part of the facility leased for King County’s use to be surplus to the City’s utility needs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $580,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Finance and Administrative Services/. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119459 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125773February 22, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119463 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125772February 22, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2019 Work Program.Res 31864 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts the Seattle City Council 2019 Work Program.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 25, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2019 Work Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2019 Adopted Budget, 2020 Endorsed Budget, and 2019-2024 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.Res 31865 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2019 Adopted Budget, 2020 Endorsed Budget, and 2019-2024 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 25, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2019 Adopted Budget, 2020 Endorsed Budget, and 2019-2024 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property surplus to the needs of the City.CB 119462 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property surplus to the needs of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125779March 1, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property surplus to the needs of the City; authorizing the sale of a portion of City Light Department real property to North Passage LLC; reserving an exclusive easement for electric transmission and distribution line purposes; and accepting payment of fair market value for the portion of the property sold, and deposit of the payment into the City Light Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $222,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119465 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125778March 1, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2019 calendar year.Res 31866 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2019 calendar year.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 8, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a Watch List of large, complex, discrete capital projects that will require enhanced quarterly monitoring reports for the 2019 calendar year.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119470 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125780March 8, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports the passage of the Medicare for All Act of 2019.Res 31867 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports the passage of the Medicare for All Act of 2019.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 12, 2019
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting the passage of the Medicare for All Act of 2019.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of a gift of a timber pavilion structure from the Seattle Parks Foundation to be installed in Occidental Square….CB 119466 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of a gift of a timber pavilion structure from the Seattle Parks Foundation to be installed in Occidental Square….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125787March 15, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acceptance of a gift of a timber pavilion structure from the Seattle Parks Foundation to be installed in Occidental Square Park for public use.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119474 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125785March 15, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Calling for additional measures by the City and its partners that complement mandatory housing affordability (MHA) implementation to promote livability and equitable….Res 31870 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Calling for additional measures by the City and its partners that complement mandatory housing affordability (MHA) implementation to promote livability and equitable….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 18, 2019
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for additional measures by the City and its partners that complement mandatory housing affordability (MHA) implementation to promote livability and equitable development, mitigate displacement, and address challenges and opportunities raised by community members during the MHA public engagement process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes related to Mandatory Housing Affordability as proposed as part of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan….CB 119443 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes related to Mandatory Housing Affordability as proposed as part of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125790March 20, 2019
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use; amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes related to Mandatory Housing Affordability as proposed as part of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Council. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the Pike Place Market, authorizing a renewal of the agreement with the Pike Place Market Preservation and Development Authority commonly known….CB 119476 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Updates the Pike Place Market, authorizing a renewal of the agreement with the Pike Place Market Preservation and Development Authority commonly known….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125794March 22, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Pike Place Market, authorizing a renewal of the agreement with the Pike Place Market Preservation and Development Authority commonly known as the “Hildt-Licata Agreement,” for a term of ten years.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Council. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119479 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125796March 22, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); revising project allocations for certain projects and adding new projects created in Ordinance 125739 into the 2019-2024 Adopted CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Describing the steps that the City Council intends to follow.Res 31868 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Describing the steps that the City Council intends to follow.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 22, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to City Council confirmation and reconfirmation of City department heads; describing the steps that the City Council intends to follow; outlining materials that should be submitted to the City Council prior to and as part of a nomination; describing general criteria that the Council intends to consider when evaluating the search process for an appointment and department head candidates; and superseding Resolution 30962.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses the final report and recommendations of the Regional Affordable Housing Task Force.Res 31871 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable Housing Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Endorses the final report and recommendations of the Regional Affordable Housing Task Force.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 22, 2019
Official sponsorsRob Johnson, Teresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing the final report and recommendations of the Regional Affordable Housing Task Force.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119481 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125793March 22, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers partial jurisdiction of a portion of the West Ewing Mini Park from the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation to Seattle….CB 119475 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers partial jurisdiction of a portion of the West Ewing Mini Park from the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation to Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125798March 29, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation and Seattle Public Utilities; transferring partial jurisdiction of a portion of the West Ewing Mini Park from the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation to Seattle Public Utilities for installation, maintenance, repair, and operation of a combined sewer underground microtunnel and associated internal underground pipes, ducts, and electrical lines; and finding that transfer of partial jurisdiction meets the requirements of Ordinance 118477, which adopted Initiative 42.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $17,880. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of….CB 119477 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125799March 29, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a waterway permit for Waterway 1 in Laurelhurst.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources on behalf of….CB 119482 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125800March 29, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources on behalf of The City of Seattle a waterway permit for Waterway 3A in the Washington Park Arboretum.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the proposed budget framework of the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission for its fiscal years 2019 through 2023.Res 31872 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the proposed budget framework of the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission for its fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 29, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the proposed budget framework of the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission for its fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119486 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125797March 29, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the community-led visioning process and the recommendations found in the U District Station Area Mobility Plan, and supporting a pedestrian-focused rebuild….Res 31873 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Recognizing the community-led visioning process and the recommendations found in the U District Station Area Mobility Plan, and supporting a pedestrian-focused rebuild….

OutcomeAdoptedApril 1, 2019
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the community-led visioning process and the recommendations found in the U District Station Area Mobility Plan, and supporting a pedestrian-focused rebuild of NE 43rd Street.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
In support of U.S. Senate Bill 726, the Personal Care Products Safety Act.Res 31876 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

In support of U.S. Senate Bill 726, the Personal Care Products Safety Act.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 1, 2019
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of U.S. Senate Bill 726, the Personal Care Products Safety Act.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119488 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125801April 5, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119492 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125803April 19, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119495 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125804April 19, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports a safe and responsive workplace in The City of Seattle’s Legislative Department and providing guidance to update Legislative Department Policies, including….Res 31879 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports a safe and responsive workplace in The City of Seattle’s Legislative Department and providing guidance to update Legislative Department Policies, including….

OutcomeAdoptedApril 22, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting a safe and responsive workplace in The City of Seattle’s Legislative Department and providing guidance to update Legislative Department Policies, including POL-LD-100 on Workplace Expectations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between The City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle….CB 119494 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between The City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125810April 26, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to King County Conservation Futures Levy proceeds; authorizing the Mayor to amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between The City of Seattle and King County authorized by City of Seattle Ordinance 114978 to allow for the acceptance of Conservation Futures Levy funds without City Council approval; and authorizing the use of a new amendment template for future amendments to that Agreement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the efforts of the North Delridge community to prepare an action plan for their community.Res 31880 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Recognizing the efforts of the North Delridge community to prepare an action plan for their community.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 26, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the efforts of the North Delridge community to prepare an action plan for their community; identifying a work program to implement the North Delridge Action Plan; and identifying proposed amendments to the Delridge Neighborhood Plan in the Comprehensive Plan for consideration in 2020.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119501 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125808April 26, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Superseding Resolution 31859.Res 31883 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Superseding Resolution 31859.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 29, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2018 and 2019; and superseding Resolution 31859.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2018-2019 and superseding Resolution 31790.Res 31884 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2018-2019 and superseding Resolution 31790.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 29, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2018-2019 and superseding Resolution 31790.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Superseding Resolution 31792.Res 31885 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Superseding Resolution 31792.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 29, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2018 and 2019, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 31792.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating positions as exempt from the civil service system.CB 119493 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125814May 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the First Quarter 2019 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from the civil service system; authorizing payment of the employee’s 2019 premium share into the Washington State paid family and medical leave insurance program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119503 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125812May 3, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119508 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125816May 16, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119514 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125817May 16, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the rezone approved through Ordinance 125640.CB 119511 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming the rezone approved through Ordinance 125640.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125820May 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; affirming the rezone approved through Ordinance 125640; and accepting an amended Property Use and Development Agreement as a condition of rezone approval. (Remand of the approval granted through C.F. 314356 of a rezone application by 70th & Greenwood Ave, LLC, C.F. 314425, SDCI Project 3023260)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119518 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125821May 24, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 31886 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 28, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; amending Attachment 1 of Resolution 31806, Chapter XI.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Resolution 31857 providing conceptual approval of a Significant Structure Term Permit to Seattle Arena Company, LLC to include the construction of….Res 31888 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31857 providing conceptual approval of a Significant Structure Term Permit to Seattle Arena Company, LLC to include the construction of….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31857 providing conceptual approval of a Significant Structure Term Permit to Seattle Arena Company, LLC to include the construction of permanent tensioned tie-backs in portions of Thomas Street, east of 1st Avenue North and west of 2nd Avenue North, and the long-term occupation of these permanent tensioned tie-backs in the right-of-way to enable the renovation of KeyArena at the Seattle Center.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119532 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125823June 3, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
In support of the right to bodily autonomy and the right to access a safe and legal abortion.Res 31889 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

In support of the right to bodily autonomy and the right to access a safe and legal abortion.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 3, 2019
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of the right to bodily autonomy and the right to access a safe and legal abortion; and affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to act consistently and proactively in support of those rights.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to land use and zoning.CB 119500 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to land use and zoning.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125835June 17, 2019
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to land use and zoning; amending Ordinance 125791 to correct map errors contained in Map A for 23.58B.050 (Section 94), Map A for 23.58C.050 (Section 97), and Attachment 1 to Ordinance 125791.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119536 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125833June 17, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes a Memorandum of Agreement setting forth the terms of collaboration between The City of Seattle and Seattle School District No. 1….CB 119535 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective BargainingYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes a Memorandum of Agreement setting forth the terms of collaboration between The City of Seattle and Seattle School District No. 1….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125841June 18, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective BargainingYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Fort Lawton Redevelopment Plan Application; authorizing a Memorandum of Agreement setting forth the terms of collaboration between The City of Seattle and Seattle School District No. 1 in the redevelopment of the former Fort Lawton Army Reserve Center.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $249,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119538 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125839June 18, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 125650 to extend its effective date by six months.CB 119504 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 125650 to extend its effective date by six months.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125846June 21, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Pike Place Market Historical District; amending Ordinance 125650 to extend its effective date by six months.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, on behalf of Seattle Public Utilities, to negotiate and execute real property lease agreements….CB 119541 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, on behalf of Seattle Public Utilities, to negotiate and execute real property lease agreements….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125848June 21, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, on behalf of Seattle Public Utilities, to negotiate and execute real property lease agreements and amendments with Broadacres LLC, for office space and ancillary uses in the Wharf Building located at 4209 21st Ave W; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $325,480. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119545 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125847June 21, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2019 and 2020.CB 119531 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2019 and 2020.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125852June 28, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to housing for low-income households; adopting the Housing Levy Administrative and Financial Plan for program years 2019 and 2020; adopting Housing Funding Policies for the 2016 Housing Levy and other fund sources; authorizing actions by the Director of Housing regarding past and future housing loans and contracts; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119548 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125849June 28, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the name of the designated Festival Street portion of East Denny Way between Broadway East and 10th Avenue East to East….CB 119558 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the name of the designated Festival Street portion of East Denny Way between Broadway East and 10th Avenue East to East….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125858July 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City streets; changing the name of the designated Festival Street portion of East Denny Way between Broadway East and 10th Avenue East to East Barbara Bailey Way; and superseding the relevant portions of Ordinance 4044, Ordinance 89910, Ordinance 102981, and any other ordinance to the extent inconsistent.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119559 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125859July 9, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts the gift of funds for design and purchase of plantings at four business nodes along Delridge Way SW as part of….CB 119560 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts the gift of funds for design and purchase of plantings at four business nodes along Delridge Way SW as part of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125861July 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting the gift of funds for design and purchase of plantings at four business nodes along Delridge Way SW as part of the Delridge Way SW - RapidRide H Line project.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,634. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedTransportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept a specified grant and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements….CB 119563 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept a specified grant and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125862July 19, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to accept a specified grant and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements for and on behalf of the City; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to the Seattle Department of Transportation; revising project allocations and spending plans for certain projects in the 2019-2024 CIP; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $602,465. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation (SDOT). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119565 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125860July 19, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants a utility easement of surface and subsurface rights to King County, through its Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Wastewater Treatment….CB 119569 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originParks & RecreationWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants a utility easement of surface and subsurface rights to King County, through its Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Wastewater Treatment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125870July 26, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationWater & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting a utility easement of surface and subsurface rights to King County, through its Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Wastewater Treatment Division (“King County”), to maintain an underground overflow pipeline and channel for the King County-owned reservoir within Discovery Park, which serves the regional wastewater facility, to meet federal guidelines for a potable water supply separation in the event of an emergency shutdown and backup of the incoming water supply.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $156,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119568 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125863July 26, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 7, 2019 through July 12, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119580 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 7, 2019 through July 12, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125866July 26, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 7, 2019 through July 12, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to funding for the Equitable Development Initiative and affordable housing.CB 119402 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to funding for the Equitable Development Initiative and affordable housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125872August 2, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to funding for the Equitable Development Initiative and affordable housing; creating a fund for short-term rental tax revenue.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Related to appropriations for the Office of Arts & Culture.CB 119583 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-originArts & CultureBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to appropriations for the Office of Arts & Culture.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125875August 2, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to appropriations for the Office of Arts & Culture; amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget; and lifting a proviso imposed on the Office of Arts & Culture’s Cultural Space Budget Control Level by Seattle City Council Green Sheet 2-5-B-1-2019.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $150,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 15, 2019 through July 19, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119586 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 15, 2019 through July 19, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125874August 2, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 15, 2019 through July 19, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts an easement from and entering into a Maintenance Agreement with Seattle Children’s Hospital, a Washington nonprofit corporation, as a condition of….CB 119564 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts an easement from and entering into a Maintenance Agreement with Seattle Children’s Hospital, a Washington nonprofit corporation, as a condition of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125883August 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; accepting an easement from and entering into a Maintenance Agreement with Seattle Children’s Hospital, a Washington nonprofit corporation, as a condition of the public benefit requirement for the street vacation of portions of 41st Avenue NE and a portion of NE 46th Street petition approval contained in Clerk File 309690.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,426. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation (DPR). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts an updated Strategic Plan.CB 119581 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts an updated Strategic Plan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125885August 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program; adopting an updated Strategic Plan; adopting a local designation of Seattle’s Center City as a “Growth and Transportation Efficiency Center” as defined by RCW 70.94.528; and amending Sections 25.02.030, 25.02.035, 25.02.040, 25.02.050, 25.02.055, 25.02.070, 25.02.080, and 25.02.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes new wage relationships for certain job titles.CB 119579 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes new wage relationships for certain job titles.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125880August 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; establishing new wage relationships for certain job titles.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $77,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating a portion of 41st Avenue Northeast and a portion of Northeast 46th Street, on the petition of Seattle Children’s Hospital (Clerk….CB 119562 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating a portion of 41st Avenue Northeast and a portion of Northeast 46th Street, on the petition of Seattle Children’s Hospital (Clerk….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125884August 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating a portion of 41st Avenue Northeast and a portion of Northeast 46th Street, on the petition of Seattle Children’s Hospital (Clerk File 309690).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing concern with the Northwest testing and training proposal of the United States Department of the Navy for Puget Sound, coastal waters….Res 31892 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing concern with the Northwest testing and training proposal of the United States Department of the Navy for Puget Sound, coastal waters….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing concern with the Northwest testing and training proposal of the United States Department of the Navy for Puget Sound, coastal waters from northern California through Washington State, and for Alaska.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Sustainability and Environment (OSE). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of a gift of three art pieces, and art tiles entitled “Explorer Voyage,” from the Friends of Christie Park….CB 119587 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of a gift of three art pieces, and art tiles entitled “Explorer Voyage,” from the Friends of Christie Park….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125878August 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acceptance of a gift of three art pieces, and art tiles entitled “Explorer Voyage,” from the Friends of Christie Park to be installed in Christie Park for public use.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 22, 2019 through July 26, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119596 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 22, 2019 through July 26, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125876August 9, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 22, 2019 through July 26, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes goals, identifying actions necessary to meet these goals, affirming the federal Green New Deal resolution, and calling for the federal government….Res 31895 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes goals, identifying actions necessary to meet these goals, affirming the federal Green New Deal resolution, and calling for the federal government….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 12, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to a Green New Deal for Seattle; establishing goals, identifying actions necessary to meet these goals, affirming the federal Green New Deal resolution, and calling for the federal government to enact policies to advance a Green New Deal.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Calling for an end to the U.S. government’s economic, commercial, and financial embargo against Cuba.Res 31897 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Calling for an end to the U.S. government’s economic, commercial, and financial embargo against Cuba.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 12, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for an end to the U.S. government’s economic, commercial, and financial embargo against Cuba.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 29, 2019 through August 2, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119605 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 29, 2019 through August 2, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125888August 19, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of July 29, 2019 through August 2, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Massnick and Levins properties in Pend Oreille County, Washington, both to be managed as Project Habitat….CB 119498 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Massnick and Levins properties in Pend Oreille County, Washington, both to be managed as Project Habitat….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125909September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting statutory warranty deeds to the Massnick and Levins properties in Pend Oreille County, Washington, both to be managed as Project Habitat Lands as required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) License Order for the Boundary Hydroelectric Project; and placing said lands under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $120,916. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 119534 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125911September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 119533 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125910September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts the pay zones for titles in the City’s Power Marketing Compensation Program.CB 119578 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originElectricityCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts the pay zones for titles in the City’s Power Marketing Compensation Program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125906September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adjusting the pay zones for titles in the City’s Power Marketing Compensation Program; establishing changes to provisions in the Power Marketing Compensation Program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Declares certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department and authorizing the sale of a portion of….CB 119591 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department and authorizing the sale of a portion of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125907September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department and authorizing the sale of a portion of the property to Snohomish County for road purposes; reserving an easement for electric transmission line purposes; and accepting the payment of fair market value for the property rights sold.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $41,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to negotiate for and purchase or lease up to two parcels of land and….CB 119592 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to negotiate for and purchase or lease up to two parcels of land and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125912September 6, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to negotiate for and purchase or lease up to two parcels of land and acquire other real property rights as necessary or desirable for the purpose of providing temporary housing for City Light personnel and contractors at the Boundary Hydroelectric Project in Pend Oreille County, Washington, and for other municipal utility purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 5, 2019 through August 9, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119611 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 5, 2019 through August 9, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125898September 6, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 5, 2019 through August 9, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 12, 2019 through August 16, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119612 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 12, 2019 through August 16, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125899September 6, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 12, 2019 through August 16, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 19, 2019 through August 23, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119613 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 19, 2019 through August 23, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125900September 6, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 19, 2019 through August 23, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 26, 2019 through August 30, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119617 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 26, 2019 through August 30, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125913September 13, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of August 26, 2019 through August 30, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to avoid procuring goods and services from corporations that purchase leases or develop oil fields in….Res 31903 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to avoid procuring goods and services from corporations that purchase leases or develop oil fields in….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 16, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to procurement and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to avoid procuring goods and services from corporations that purchase leases or develop oil fields in the Arctic Refuge Coastal Plain.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
In support of the youth-led September 20, 2019 Global Climate Strike.Res 31907 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originClimateYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

In support of the youth-led September 20, 2019 Global Climate Strike.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 16, 2019
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ClimateYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of the youth-led September 20, 2019 Global Climate Strike; urging Seattle Public Schools to support its students’ right to assemble and participate in the Global Climate Strike; and affirming that City employees may request unpaid leave for a day of conscience on September 20, 2019.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLeg. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating a portion of Armory Way as condemned by Ordinance 67125, lying between Western Avenue and Elliott Avenue and vacated Pine Street….CB 119610 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating a portion of Armory Way as condemned by Ordinance 67125, lying between Western Avenue and Elliott Avenue and vacated Pine Street….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125925September 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating a portion of Armory Way as condemned by Ordinance 67125, lying between Western Avenue and Elliott Avenue and vacated Pine Street and Virginia Street, adjacent to the PC-1 North Site within the Pike Place Market Historical District, on the petition of the Pike Place Market Preservation and Development Authority (Clerk File 313716).

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Designating positions as exempt from the civil service system.CB 119626 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & BenefitsWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125919September 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & BenefitsWorkplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Second Quarter 2019 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from the civil service system; returning a position to the civil service system; and adjusting salary ranges for certain pay titles; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate a below-grade private thermal energy exchange system under and across John Street, east of….Res 31899 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate a below-grade private thermal energy exchange system under and across John Street, east of….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate a below-grade private thermal energy exchange system under and across John Street, east of Boren Avenue North and west of Fairview Avenue North; as proposed by Onni DEU (John Street) LLC.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Establishes the Green New Deal Oversight Board.CB 119604 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originCompensation & BenefitsGovernment Accountability Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes the Green New Deal Oversight Board.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125926September 20, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & BenefitsGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Green New Deal for Seattle; establishing the Green New Deal Oversight Board; providing compensation for those who incur a financial hardship by their participation on the Board; requesting that the Office of Sustainability and Environment create an interdepartmental team to advance the Green New Deal for Seattle; amending Section 3.14.970 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and adding a new Section 3.14.979 to the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $34,000. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Reclaiming the inherent responsibility of the City to protect its most vulnerable populations.Res 31900 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originBudget & AppropriationsImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Reclaiming the inherent responsibility of the City to protect its most vulnerable populations.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 20, 2019
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reclaiming the inherent responsibility of the City to protect its most vulnerable populations; acknowledging the disproportionally high rate of violence against women of Indigenous communities; urging City departments to deliver sustainable investments that address the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG) crisis, and establish a new, racially appropriate framework of understanding an approach to ending violence against Indigenous women and girls; and calling on the Mayor of Seattle to drive systemic reform that requests and empowers and holds accountable related City departments to work in cooperation with Native Communities to build trust and engagement for stronger government-to-government relations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Housing to grant a lease of the real property to Plymouth Housing Group or its affiliate or designee.CB 119643 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Housing to grant a lease of the real property to Plymouth Housing Group or its affiliate or designee.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125922September 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to real property located at Mercer Street and Second Avenue North; authorizing the Director of Housing to grant a lease of the real property to Plymouth Housing Group or its affiliate or designee; and authorizing related agreements and actions to support the development of affordable housing and ground floor cultural uses at the Mercer Street and Second Avenue North property.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Phone:-. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Adjusts the pay zone structures for the City’s Information Technology Professional discretionary pay program.CB 119624 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originZoningTechnology & BroadbandCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts the pay zone structures for the City’s Information Technology Professional discretionary pay program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125918September 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Sally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningTechnology & BroadbandCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adjusting the pay zone structures for the City’s Information Technology Professional discretionary pay program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 2, 2019 through September 6, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119646 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 2, 2019 through September 6, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125915September 20, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 2, 2019 through September 6, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests the Seattle Department of Transportation develop a traffic signals policy.Res 31909 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests the Seattle Department of Transportation develop a traffic signals policy.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 30, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting the Seattle Department of Transportation develop a traffic signals policy.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests a plan to develop an “Infants at Work” pilot program for eligible City of Seattle employees and their infants.Res 31910 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a plan to develop an “Infants at Work” pilot program for eligible City of Seattle employees and their infants.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 30, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting a plan to develop an “Infants at Work” pilot program for eligible City of Seattle employees and their infants.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the name of the portion of NW 54th Street, generally located between NW Market Street and one block southwest at the….CB 119618 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the name of the portion of NW 54th Street, generally located between NW Market Street and one block southwest at the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125947October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City streets; changing the name of the portion of NW 54th Street, generally located between NW Market Street and one block southwest at the entrance to the Ballard Locks, to NW Locks Place; and superseding any other prior ordinances to the extent inconsistent.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2018 surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Department of Transportation’s use of closed-circuit television traffic….CB 119519 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes approval of uses and accepting the 2018 surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Department of Transportation’s use of closed-circuit television traffic….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125936October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to surveillance technology implementation; authorizing approval of uses and accepting the 2018 surveillance impact reports for the Seattle Department of Transportation’s use of closed-circuit television traffic cameras and license plate readers.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT/ITD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute a memorandum of agreement between The City of Seattle and the Muckleshoot….CB 119647 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute a memorandum of agreement between The City of Seattle and the Muckleshoot….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125943October 4, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute a memorandum of agreement between The City of Seattle and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe for the transfer and curation of the Chester Morse Collection; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed2 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 9, 2019 through September 13, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119657 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 9, 2019 through September 13, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125935October 4, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 9, 2019 through September 13, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating Carr Place North between North 34th Street and North 35th Street, on the petition of Seattle Public Utilities (Clerk File 312535).CB 119614 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating Carr Place North between North 34th Street and North 35th Street, on the petition of Seattle Public Utilities (Clerk File 312535).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125961October 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating Carr Place North between North 34th Street and North 35th Street, on the petition of Seattle Public Utilities (Clerk File 312535).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of Seattle Public Utilities.CB 119639 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125955October 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of Seattle Public Utilities; and authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an easement agreement with Little Green Valley, LLC, a Washington limited liability company; Nancy J. Gleason; Ron L. Nickell aka Ronald L. Nickell and Sandra Flint Nickell, Husband and Wife; William H. Flint; The Heirs of Charles Eugene Flint; and Joan H. Zimmerman, allowing the use of certain City of Seattle property in the north half of the southwest quarter of Section 5, Township 22 North, Range 6 East, W.M., in King County Washington for access purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $3,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute the NorthernGrid Funding Agreement.CB 119631 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute the NorthernGrid Funding Agreement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125956October 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute the NorthernGrid Funding Agreement; authorizing the execution of supplements, extensions, and amendments to such agreement subject to appropriated budget authority; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants authority for the Department to offer term-limited pilot programs to study demand response and low-income assistance programs.CB 119632 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants authority for the Department to offer term-limited pilot programs to study demand response and low-income assistance programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125957October 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; granting authority for the Department to offer term-limited pilot programs to study demand response and low-income assistance programs.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests the Seattle Department of Transportation develop policy options for the maintenance of existing sidewalks, create a public education program on snow….Res 31908 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & SidewalksYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests the Seattle Department of Transportation develop policy options for the maintenance of existing sidewalks, create a public education program on snow….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 11, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting the Seattle Department of Transportation develop policy options for the maintenance of existing sidewalks, create a public education program on snow and ice removal responsibilities, and develop a program to enforce snow and ice removal requirements by private property owners.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 16, 2019 through September 20, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119660 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 16, 2019 through September 20, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125949October 11, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 16, 2019 through September 20, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Physical Development Management Plan for Sand Point, as adopted by Resolution 29429 and amended by Resolution 30063, Resolution 31223, and….Res 31905 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Physical Development Management Plan for Sand Point, as adopted by Resolution 29429 and amended by Resolution 30063, Resolution 31223, and….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 18, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending the Physical Development Management Plan for Sand Point, as adopted by Resolution 29429 and amended by Resolution 30063, Resolution 31223, and Resolution 31412.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed3 not voting
Declares the City Council’s and the Mayor’s intent to consider strategies to protect trees and increase Seattle’s tree canopy cover.Res 31902 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Declares the City Council’s and the Mayor’s intent to consider strategies to protect trees and increase Seattle’s tree canopy cover.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 18, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring the City Council’s and the Mayor’s intent to consider strategies to protect trees and increase Seattle’s tree canopy cover.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Opposing Washington Initiative Measure 976 (“I-976”) and urging Seattle voters to vote “No” on I-976 on the November 5, 2019, general election….Res 31911 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Opposing Washington Initiative Measure 976 (“I-976”) and urging Seattle voters to vote “No” on I-976 on the November 5, 2019, general election….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 18, 2019
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION opposing Washington Initiative Measure 976 (“I-976”) and urging Seattle voters to vote “No” on I-976 on the November 5, 2019, general election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 23, 2019 through September 27, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119662 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 23, 2019 through September 27, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125963October 18, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 23, 2019 through September 27, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 30, 2019 through October 4, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119665 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 30, 2019 through October 4, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125965October 18, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of September 30, 2019 through October 4, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Concerning Washington Referendum Measure No. 88 (“Referendum 88”), proposing voter approval of Initiative Measure No. 1000, and urging Seattle voters to vote….Res 31913 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Concerning Washington Referendum Measure No. 88 (“Referendum 88”), proposing voter approval of Initiative Measure No. 1000, and urging Seattle voters to vote….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 24, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION concerning Washington Referendum Measure No. 88 (“Referendum 88”), proposing voter approval of Initiative Measure No. 1000, and urging Seattle voters to vote “Approved” on Referendum 88 on the November 5, 2019, general election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 7, 2019 through October 11, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119666 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 7, 2019 through October 11, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125967October 25, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 7, 2019 through October 11, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 14, 2019 through October 18, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119693 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 14, 2019 through October 18, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125968November 8, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 14, 2019 through October 18, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 21, 2019 through October 25, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119694 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 21, 2019 through October 25, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125969November 15, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 21, 2019 through October 25, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 28, 2019 through November 1, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119698 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 28, 2019 through November 1, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125970November 15, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of October 28, 2019 through November 1, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Request that SDOT and CBO report on the schedule and status of third party funding discussions regarding South Transit's West Seattle and….SLI SDOT-25-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT and CBO report on the schedule and status of third party funding discussions regarding South Transit's West Seattle and….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT and CBO report on the schedule and status of third party funding discussions regarding South Transit's West Seattle and Ballard Link Extension project

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Recognizing the importance of our healthcare workers.Res 31917 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originPublic Health Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Recognizing the importance of our healthcare workers.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 25, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Public Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the importance of our healthcare workers; supporting the unionized workers of SEIU Healthcare 1199 NW exercising their right to strike and withhold their labor.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Retiring obsolete interfund loan authorizations.CB 119690 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Retiring obsolete interfund loan authorizations.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125999December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to interfund loans; retiring obsolete interfund loan authorizations; and repealing Ordinances 121179, 124652, and 125202.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the 2019-2020 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.CB 119671 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the 2019-2020 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125984December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; establishing the 2019-2020 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services; and superseding previous park and recreation fee schedules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $45,475. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2020.CB 119689 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2020.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126000December 2, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2020; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 4, 2019 through November 8, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119702 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 4, 2019 through November 8, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125972December 2, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 4, 2019 through November 8, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 11, 2019 through November 15, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119705 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 11, 2019 through November 15, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125978December 2, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 11, 2019 through November 15, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 31920 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 9, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; superseding Resolutions 31806 and 31886.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,019. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes the acquisition of real property adjacent to Terry Pettus Park on Lake Union.CB 119661 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property adjacent to Terry Pettus Park on Lake Union.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126014December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property adjacent to Terry Pettus Park on Lake Union; authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $740,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks & Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares 5-foot wide properties that lie between the northwesterly line of Clarmar Crags, recorded Vol. 37 page 47 in King County, and….CB 119644 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares 5-foot wide properties that lie between the northwesterly line of Clarmar Crags, recorded Vol. 37 page 47 in King County, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126018December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; declaring 5-foot wide properties that lie between the northwesterly line of Clarmar Crags, recorded Vol. 37 page 47 in King County, and the southeasterly line of Alki Beach, an unrecorded plat; being a portion of the Undesignated Tract of Plat of West Seattle Park, recorded Vol. 3 page 177 in King County, as surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of said properties to the owners of the adjoining properties; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute all documents for the sale and transfer of the properties at fair market value; and directing how proceeds from the sale shall be distributed.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $26,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts the pay zone structures for 2019 and 2020 for the City’s discretionary pay programs.CB 119713 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originZoningCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts the pay zone structures for 2019 and 2020 for the City’s discretionary pay programs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126009December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, to be known as the Pay Zone Ordinance; adjusting the pay zone structures for 2019 and 2020 for the City’s discretionary pay programs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into an easement area amendment agreement with King County, to revise the….CB 119707 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into an easement area amendment agreement with King County, to revise the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126013December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into an easement area amendment agreement with King County, to revise the legal description of an existing easement for an electric transmission and distribution line through King County Airport property.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 18, 2019 through November 22, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119708 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 18, 2019 through November 22, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126004December 13, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 18, 2019 through November 22, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 25, 2019 through November 29, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119723 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 25, 2019 through November 29, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126005December 13, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of November 25, 2019 through November 29, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to execute an interlocal agreement with King County for the establishment of the King County Regional Homelessness Authority.CB 119724 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to execute an interlocal agreement with King County for the establishment of the King County Regional Homelessness Authority.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126021December 18, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote5 in favor · 1 opposed
Homelessness ServicesProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to services for people experiencing homelessness; authorizing the Mayor to execute an interlocal agreement with King County for the establishment of the King County Regional Homelessness Authority; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office/Legislative Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 1 opposed
Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs.CB 119709 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126024December 23, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to relinquish such easement rights and to accept new easements; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service….CB 119710 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126025December 23, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service meters, and appurtenances necessary for water utility purposes at various locations in Seattle; placing the property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a compensation program for the position of Chief Technology Officer.CB 119725 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a compensation program for the position of Chief Technology Officer.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126029December 23, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; creating a compensation program for the position of Chief Technology Officer; specifying provisions for the administration of said compensation program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, on behalf of Seattle Public Utilities, to negotiate and execute a real property lease….CB 119711 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, on behalf of Seattle Public Utilities, to negotiate and execute a real property lease….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126026December 23, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, on behalf of Seattle Public Utilities, to negotiate and execute a real property lease amendment with Georgetown LLC, for yard space at 5821 First Ave South; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $132,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the transfer of jurisdiction of certain property in Lots 1 and 2, Sharpless Second Addition to the City of Seattle, commonly….CB 119712 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the transfer of jurisdiction of certain property in Lots 1 and 2, Sharpless Second Addition to the City of Seattle, commonly….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126027December 23, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote5 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City-owned property; authorizing the transfer of jurisdiction of certain property in Lots 1 and 2, Sharpless Second Addition to the City of Seattle, commonly referred to as 4502 Midvale Avenue North; Tract 18, Excelsior Acre Tracts, commonly referred to as 9399 8th Ave South; Block 19B, Supplemental Plat Blocks 6, 7, 18, and 19B of York Addition to Seattle, commonly referred to as 3601 York Road South; and a portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 24, Range 04, Willamette Meridian, commonly referred to as 6298 51st Place South; from the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to the Seattle Department of Transportation; designating the properties for street purposes; and laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of North Midvale Place, 8th Avenue South, York Road South, and 51st Place South.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 1 opposed
Designating positions as exempt from the civil service system and returning a position to the civil service system.CB 119716 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & BenefitsWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from the civil service system and returning a position to the civil service system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126028December 23, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & BenefitsWorkplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Fourth Quarter 2019 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from the civil service system and returning a position to the civil service system; and establishing a new title and salary; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2020 State Legislative Agenda.Res 31918 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2020 State Legislative Agenda.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 23, 2019
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2020 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 2, 2019 through December 6, 2019 and ordering the payment….CB 119727 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 2, 2019 through December 6, 2019 and ordering the payment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126022December 23, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims for the week of December 2, 2019 through December 6, 2019 and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs.CB 119165 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125509January 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights to be surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to grant a permanent, non-exclusive water utility easement, and restrictive well covenants, to the Sallal Water Association, a non-profit Washington corporation, for the purpose of construction, operation, and maintenance of a water system; and over, upon, across, and under a portion of The City of Seattle’s Cedar River Watershed property in Section 34, Township 23 North, Range 8 East, W.M., in King County, Washington.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $97,200. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 disqualified
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into agreements with the Port of Seattle and….CB 119140 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into agreements with the Port of Seattle and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125508January 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into agreements with the Port of Seattle and BP West Coast Products LLC for the purposes of satisfying utility-related conditions for the Port’s street vacation petition for its Terminal 18 Redevelopment Project on Harbor Island, City of Seattle Clerk File No. 301929; declaring certain easement rights located on Harbor Island as no longer required for municipal utility purposes and surplus to the City’s needs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a Memorandum of Lease and Ground Lease Agreement with….CB 119166 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a Memorandum of Lease and Ground Lease Agreement with….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125510January 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a Memorandum of Lease and Ground Lease Agreement with King County for a radio tower and appurtenances in the Tolt Watershed.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept an amended, extended, and restated franchise agreement for the operation of a….CB 119167 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originFire & EMSWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept an amended, extended, and restated franchise agreement for the operation of a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125511January 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept an amended, extended, and restated franchise agreement for the operation of a water system within public rights-of-way of the City of Shoreline until 2026, and to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the Shoreline Fire Department for hydrant inspection within The City of Seattle’s retail service area within the City of Shoreline; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 5104 SW Orleans Street.CB 119169 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 5104 SW Orleans Street.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125507January 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 5104 SW Orleans Street; and authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $250,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119170 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125502January 5, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119172 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125503January 5, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119174 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125504January 5, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Superseding Resolution 31749.Res 31792 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Superseding Resolution 31749.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 16, 2018
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2018 and 2019, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees; and superseding Resolution 31749.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119175 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125512January 17, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers partial jurisdiction of real property within Block 1, Plat of Yesler Terrace Community, as recorded in Volume 267, page 59 of….CB 119177 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers partial jurisdiction of real property within Block 1, Plat of Yesler Terrace Community, as recorded in Volume 267, page 59 of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125514January 19, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationWater & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation and Seattle Public Utilities; transferring partial jurisdiction of real property within Block 1, Plat of Yesler Terrace Community, as recorded in Volume 267, page 59 of plats; for maintenance, repair, replacement, and operation of the existing combined drainage and sewer facility.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119180 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125513January 19, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119183 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125521February 1, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending Ordinance 125429 to modify the effective date of certain sections of that ordinance.CB 119168 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 125429 to modify the effective date of certain sections of that ordinance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125520February 1, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125429 to modify the effective date of certain sections of that ordinance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119181 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125519February 1, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2018 Work Program.Res 31796 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Seattle City Council 2018 Work Program.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2018 Work Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of the Statutory Warranty Deed for the “Hansen Property” in Skagit County, Washington, placing said land under the jurisdiction….CB 119187 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of the Statutory Warranty Deed for the “Hansen Property” in Skagit County, Washington, placing said land under the jurisdiction….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125525February 9, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the acceptance of the Statutory Warranty Deed for the “Hansen Property” in Skagit County, Washington, placing said land under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department, and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119188 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125524February 9, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2018 Adopted Budget and 2018-2023 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.Res 31795 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2018 Adopted Budget and 2018-2023 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 9, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2018 Adopted Budget and 2018-2023 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of a donation of real property along the Burke-Gilman Trail in northeast Seattle, from the Estate of Jack Allbritton….CB 119176 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of a donation of real property along the Burke-Gilman Trail in northeast Seattle, from the Estate of Jack Allbritton….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125527February 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acceptance of a donation of real property along the Burke-Gilman Trail in northeast Seattle, from the Estate of Jack Allbritton, for open space, park, and recreation purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119192 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125526February 14, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ratifying the 2017 update to the Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed, or Water Resource Inventory Area 8, Chinook Salmon Conservation Plan.Res 31799 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

ratifying the 2017 update to the Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed, or Water Resource Inventory Area 8, Chinook Salmon Conservation Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 23, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION ratifying the 2017 update to the Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed, or Water Resource Inventory Area 8, Chinook Salmon Conservation Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes an ongoing Customer Review Panel to maintain continuous stakeholder engagement as SPU implements the six-year Strategic Business Plan (Plan) and conducts….Res 31800 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes an ongoing Customer Review Panel to maintain continuous stakeholder engagement as SPU implements the six-year Strategic Business Plan (Plan) and conducts….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 23, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Public Utilities (SPU); establishing an ongoing Customer Review Panel to maintain continuous stakeholder engagement as SPU implements the six-year Strategic Business Plan (Plan) and conducts future Plan updates.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the Seattle Pedestrian Master Plan 2018-2022 Implementation Plan and Progress Report.Res 31794 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the Seattle Pedestrian Master Plan 2018-2022 Implementation Plan and Progress Report.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 23, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the Seattle Pedestrian Master Plan 2018-2022 Implementation Plan and Progress Report.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSDOT. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119197 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125532February 23, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Addressing a proposed liquefied natural gas facility in Tacoma, and urging the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to improve tribal consultation procedures….Res 31793 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originClimateImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Addressing a proposed liquefied natural gas facility in Tacoma, and urging the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to improve tribal consultation procedures….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ClimateImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION addressing a proposed liquefied natural gas facility in Tacoma, and urging the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to improve tribal consultation procedures and collaborate with regional mayors, leaders, and tribes to address the growing impact of climate change.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Phone: CBO Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Calling for review of current methods for collecting data on Native Communities, and potential strategies for improving such data collection, and exploration….Res 31801 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Calling for review of current methods for collecting data on Native Communities, and potential strategies for improving such data collection, and exploration….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2018
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for review of current methods for collecting data on Native Communities, and potential strategies for improving such data collection, and exploration of the need for capacity-building for organizations seeking to assist Native Communities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119199 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125535March 2, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119203 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125536March 8, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, alley, utility, or street and alley turn-around purposes.CB 119206 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, alley, utility, or street and alley turn-around purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125541March 16, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, alley, utility, or street and alley turn-around purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the sidewalk adjoining Tilt49, a condominium recorded under Recording Number 20150526000478; the sidewalk adjoining Block 6, A. B. Graham’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining a portion of the Southeast quarter, Section 31, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the alley turn-around in Block 4, Lawton Heights; the sidewalk adjoining a portion of vacated Northeast 40th Street (Northeast Campus Parkway) and Block C, Brooklyn Supplemental Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, vacated 15th Avenue Northeast, and Block 36, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 8, Oak Lake Villa Tracts; the sidewalk adjoining Block 22, Hill Tract Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Lots 7 through 12 and Lots 19 through 21, Ulferts Addition, together with the adjoining vacated alley, and a portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 27, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalk adjoining Government Lot 5, Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalk adjoining Block 1, Witt’s Addition to the City of Seattle, and a portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the street turn-around adjoining Government Lot 1, Section 30, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalks adjoining The Whittaker, a condominium recorded under King County Recording Number 20141218000344; the sidewalk adjoining Lots 1 through 4, Sharpless Second Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 2, Overland Park; the sidewalks adjoining Block 4, Carr’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 23, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out on the Claims of C. D. Boren and A. A. Denny and H. L. Yesler (Commonly known as C. D. Boren’s Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 33, Denny & Hoyt’s Addition to the City of Seattle; and the sidewalk abutting Block 33, Denny & Hoyt’s Addition to the City of Seattle.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119208 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125543March 16, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: 4th Avenue South and South Michigan Street abutting Block 4, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to the City of Seattle; 4th Avenue South and South Michigan Street abutting Block 13, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 22, Second Addition to that part of the City of Seattle, as laid off by A. A. Denny and W. N. Bell (Commonly known as Bell & Denny’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 81, D. T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 75, D. T. Denny’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; North 137th Street abutting Block 1, Allendale; the alley in Block 7, Francies R. Day’s LaGrande; the alley in Block 41, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (Commonly known as the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 26, Gilman’s Addition to the City of Seattle; 34th Avenue South and 35th Avenue South abutting Block 3, York 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle and Block 44, C. D. Hillman’s Rainier Boulevard Garden Addition; the alley in Block 31, Second Addition to that part of the City of Seattle, as laid off by A. A. Denny and W. N. Bell (Commonly known as Bell & Denny’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 90, D. T. Denny’s Fifth Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 135, A. A. Denny’s Broadway Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 90, D. T. Denny’s 5th Addition to North Seattle; South State Street abutting Block 22, Sander’s Supplemental Plat; the alley in Block 46, Central Seattle; the alley in Block 15, University Park Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 2, South Byron Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 25, Second Addition to that part of the City of Seattle, as laid off by A. A. Denny and W. N. Bell (Commonly known as Bell & Denny’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle).)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119209 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125538March 16, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Regarding a civil legal aid project with the King County Department of Public Defense and its scope of work for representation services.Res 31802 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Regarding a civil legal aid project with the King County Department of Public Defense and its scope of work for representation services.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 19, 2018
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding a civil legal aid project with the King County Department of Public Defense and its scope of work for representation services.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Opposing concealed carry reciprocity.Res 31805 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Opposing concealed carry reciprocity.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2018
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION opposing concealed carry reciprocity.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to execute, for and on behalf of The City of Seattle, an interlocal agreement with King County for the….CB 119149 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to execute, for and on behalf of The City of Seattle, an interlocal agreement with King County for the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125552March 30, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Human Services Department; authorizing the Mayor to execute, for and on behalf of The City of Seattle, an interlocal agreement with King County for the administration of the Seattle-King County Area Agency on Aging as provided for in Title III of the Older Americans Act of 1965; superseding a prior interlocal agreement authorized by Ordinance 102148 and amended by Ordinance 120196; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the 20-foot wide properties in the plat of Little’s 85th St. Addition, and adjacent to 8515 and 8521 Latona Ave NE….CB 119191 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the 20-foot wide properties in the plat of Little’s 85th St. Addition, and adjacent to 8515 and 8521 Latona Ave NE….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125546March 30, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; declaring the 20-foot wide properties in the plat of Little’s 85th St. Addition, and adjacent to 8515 and 8521 Latona Ave NE, and adjacent to 8520 and 8526 2nd Ave NE, as surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of said properties to the owners of the adjoining properties; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute all documents for the sale and transfer of the properties; and directing how proceeds from the sale shall be distributed.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services (FAS). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of a sewer pipe, sewer and drainage infrastructure, underground….CB 119213 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of a sewer pipe, sewer and drainage infrastructure, underground….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125550March 30, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of a sewer pipe, sewer and drainage infrastructure, underground utility pipelines and related equipment, a public sanitary sewer mainline, a public storm drain mainline, a public storm drain manhole, and access and appurtenances necessary for drainage and wastewater utility purposes at various locations in Seattle; placing the property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within the City of Seattle as being surplus to City….CB 119212 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within the City of Seattle as being surplus to City….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125549March 30, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within the City of Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to relinquish such easement rights and to accept new easements; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service….CB 119211 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125548March 30, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service meters and appurtenances necessary for water utility purposes at various locations in Seattle; placing the property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights relating to water facility easements within the City of Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs.CB 119210 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights relating to water facility easements within the City of Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125547March 30, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights relating to water facility easements within the City of Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to relinquish such easement rights and to accept new easements for City-owned water facilities; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119216 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125544March 30, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119219 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125553March 30, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a work program for the City Council to review the administrative rules and regulations to improve customer service and lower costs….Res 31808 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes a work program for the City Council to review the administrative rules and regulations to improve customer service and lower costs….

OutcomeAdoptedApril 9, 2018
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the for-hire transportation industry; establishing a work program for the City Council to review the administrative rules and regulations to improve customer service and lower costs to participants, and to explore ways to ensure equal market access to all participants.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of agreements for up to 30 buildings, including buildings participating in the City’s 2030 Challenge High Performance Existing Building Pilot….CB 119225 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of agreements for up to 30 buildings, including buildings participating in the City’s 2030 Challenge High Performance Existing Building Pilot….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125556April 11, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing execution of agreements for up to 30 buildings, including buildings participating in the City’s 2030 Challenge High Performance Existing Building Pilot, for the purchase and/or sale of energy occurring as part of the Energy Efficiency as a Service pilot projects with a contract length of up to 20 years to test the viability of providing Energy Efficiency as a Service as part of the utility’s pay for performance program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119222 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125557April 13, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119232 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125560April 13, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the recording of environmental covenants or the equivalent on certain City-owned or controlled property.CB 119233 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the recording of environmental covenants or the equivalent on certain City-owned or controlled property.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125566April 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the remediation of the South Park Landfill; authorizing the recording of environmental covenants or the equivalent on certain City-owned or controlled property; and authorizing the General Manager of Seattle Public Utilities to execute a legal agreement with other Potentially Liable Persons.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $354,938. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119235 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125564April 20, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Revising the procedures and the criteria for consideration of proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan as part of the annual “docket,” and….Res 31807 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Revising the procedures and the criteria for consideration of proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan as part of the annual “docket,” and….

OutcomeAdoptedApril 23, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Comprehensive Plan; revising the procedures and the criteria for consideration of proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan as part of the annual “docket,” and repealing Resolutions 31402 and 31117.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 31806 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 23, 2018
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; superseding Resolutions 31639 and 31659.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent to enter into a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement with Woodland Park Lawn Bowling Club (WPLBC) to promote the….CB 119214 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent to enter into a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement with Woodland Park Lawn Bowling Club (WPLBC) to promote the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125569April 27, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR); authorizing the Superintendent to enter into a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement with Woodland Park Lawn Bowling Club (WPLBC) to promote the lawn sports of bocce, croquet and lawn bowling and provide access and rental opportunities to the Woodland Park Lawn Bowling Clubhouse and Greens.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $7,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Grants Acorn Development LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines for a site-specific heat conveyance system and other related….CB 119227 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Acorn Development LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines for a site-specific heat conveyance system and other related….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125572April 27, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Acorn Development LLC permission to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade utility lines for a site-specific heat conveyance system and other related utilities under and across Blanchard Street between 6th Avenue and 7th Avenue, Blanchard Street between 7th Avenue and 8th Avenue, and 7th Avenue between Bell Street and Blanchard Street; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $18,360. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute for and on behalf of the City a Concession Agreement granting Miri’s Seattle….CB 119223 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute for and on behalf of the City a Concession Agreement granting Miri’s Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125570April 27, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute for and on behalf of the City a Concession Agreement granting Miri’s Seattle LLC the right to exclusive use and occupancy of the Golden Gardens Bathhouse Concession Premises for the purpose of providing food and concessions for park patrons at Golden Gardens Park.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $37,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119242 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125567April 27, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125544, correcting a clerical error regarding appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119243 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125544, correcting a clerical error regarding appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125574May 4, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125544, correcting a clerical error regarding appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $53,852. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services (FAS) - Treasury. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119246 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125573May 4, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
In support of the bid by The City of Seattle to host the National League of Cities 2024 or 2025 City Summit….Res 31813 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

In support of the bid by The City of Seattle to host the National League of Cities 2024 or 2025 City Summit….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 4, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of the bid by The City of Seattle to host the National League of Cities 2024 or 2025 City Summit conference.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119247 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125577May 11, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to appropriations for the Human Services Department.CB 119245 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to appropriations for the Human Services Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125581May 16, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to appropriations for the Human Services Department; amending Ordinance 125475, which adopted the 2018 budget; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $90,960. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119251 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125579May 16, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts revised Street Vacation Policies for the City of Seattle and repealing previous versions of the policies adopted by Resolutions 27527, 28605….Res 31809 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Adopts revised Street Vacation Policies for the City of Seattle and repealing previous versions of the policies adopted by Resolutions 27527, 28605….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 21, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting revised Street Vacation Policies for the City of Seattle and repealing previous versions of the policies adopted by Resolutions 27527, 28605, 30297, 30702, and 31142.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Council. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the 2015 Seattle Building Code as adopted by Ordinance 125161.CB 119248 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the 2015 Seattle Building Code as adopted by Ordinance 125161.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125588June 1, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending the 2015 Seattle Building Code as adopted by Ordinance 125161; allowing the height limitation increase for Occupancy Group R-2 of Type IIIA construction be increased to six stories and 75 feet where all specified provisions are met.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the value of Equitable Development Agreements and outlining how the agreements may be considered when evaluating the required community engagement processes….Res 31811 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Recognizing the value of Equitable Development Agreements and outlining how the agreements may be considered when evaluating the required community engagement processes….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 1, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the value of Equitable Development Agreements and outlining how the agreements may be considered when evaluating the required community engagement processes and public benefit packages associated with street vacations and large development projects that are subject to review by the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a lease with the Department of the Army….CB 119259 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a lease with the Department of the Army….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125585June 1, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a lease with the Department of the Army for the City’s continued use of an approximately 13,000-square-foot warehouse facility at 1561 Alaskan Way South for the operation of the St. Martin de Porres Shelter for homeless men over the age of 50; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to civil legal aid services.CB 119260 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to civil legal aid services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125583June 1, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to civil legal aid services; authorizing an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for Public Defense Services with King County, previously authorized under Ordinance 125411, to carry out a program for civil legal services for indigent clients according to the terms of Resolution 31802.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $440,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCBO. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119257 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125590June 1, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119262 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125582June 1, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Superseding and replacing the language in Statement of Legislative Intent, 281-1-B-2, adopted in Resolution 31795.Res 31817 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Superseding and replacing the language in Statement of Legislative Intent, 281-1-B-2, adopted in Resolution 31795.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 13, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION superseding and replacing the language in Statement of Legislative Intent, 281-1-B-2, adopted in Resolution 31795.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119265 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125593June 13, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing a portion of Mercer Street.CB 119010 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing a portion of Mercer Street.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125597June 22, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City-owned property under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation, located at 800 Mercer Street in Eden Addition to the City of Seattle, and a portion of 8th Avenue North vacated pursuant to Ordinance 89653; and laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing a portion of Mercer Street.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts a deed for street purposes for certain real property in Block 2, Public Benefit Subdivision of Tract 17, Georgetown.CB 119241 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts a deed for street purposes for certain real property in Block 2, Public Benefit Subdivision of Tract 17, Georgetown.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125598June 22, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Arterial Asphalt and Concrete Program Phase II; accepting a deed for street purposes for certain real property in Block 2, Public Benefit Subdivision of Tract 17, Georgetown; laying off, opening, widening, extending, establishing, and designating the property for street purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such deed under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests the Seattle Department of Transportation provide quarterly reporting to City Council on implementation of the One Center City program.Res 31814 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests the Seattle Department of Transportation provide quarterly reporting to City Council on implementation of the One Center City program.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 22, 2018
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting the Seattle Department of Transportation provide quarterly reporting to City Council on implementation of the One Center City program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125561 to rename the plat of “Madrona Glen” to “Madrona Glen Estates”.CB 119268 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Ordinance 125561 to rename the plat of “Madrona Glen” to “Madrona Glen Estates”.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125596June 22, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125561 to rename the plat of “Madrona Glen” to “Madrona Glen Estates”.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119270 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125595June 22, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sponsoring the Games.Res 31820 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sponsoring the Games.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 22, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the 2018 Special Olympics USA Games; and sponsoring the Games.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $30,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119281 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125600June 22, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119293 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125605June 29, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.CB 119273 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective BargainingWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125617July 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective BargainingWorkplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the First Quarter 2018 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; authorizing the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Understanding by and between The City of Seattle, Seattle Public Utilities and the United Association of Journeyman and Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry Local 32; creating non-exempt positions; modifying positions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director or the Director’s designee to execute a non-exclusive sub-surface sewer utility easement and a non-exclusive sub-surface water utility easement….CB 119284 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director or the Director’s designee to execute a non-exclusive sub-surface sewer utility easement and a non-exclusive sub-surface water utility easement….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125625July 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director or the Director’s designee to execute a non-exclusive sub-surface sewer utility easement and a non-exclusive sub-surface water utility easement under, across, and upon a portion of the property known as Fire Station 28 located at 5968 Rainier Avenue South, Seattle, Washington, to Anne Michelson, an unmarried person, and to the successor owners of the property located at 5970 Rainier Ave South, Seattle, WA.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services (FAS). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a 2019-2024 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing a six-year rate path required to support the Strategic Plan.Res 31819 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2019-2024 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing a six-year rate path required to support the Strategic Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; adopting a 2019-2024 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing a six-year rate path required to support the Strategic Plan.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Amending Resolution 31800.Res 31825 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31800.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Public Utilities (SPU); amending Resolution 31800; updating the ongoing Customer Review Panel to maintain continuous stakeholder engagement as SPU implements the six-year Strategic Business Plan (Plan) and conducts future Plan updates.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119295 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125613July 20, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119296 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125614July 20, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119300 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125622July 20, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
In support of the Seventy-first World Health Assembly resolution on infant and young child feeding, affirming The City of Seattle’s recognition of….Res 31828 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

In support of the Seventy-first World Health Assembly resolution on infant and young child feeding, affirming The City of Seattle’s recognition of….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 20, 2018
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of the Seventy-first World Health Assembly resolution on infant and young child feeding, affirming The City of Seattle’s recognition of breastfeeding as critical to infant and maternal health.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of….CB 119301 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125629July 27, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of The City of Seattle, an Aquatic Lands Lease for Andrews Bay; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves and authorizing an amendment to the Development Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority….CB 119294 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransitPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves and authorizing an amendment to the Development Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125631July 27, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE approving and authorizing an amendment to the Development Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority for real property above and adjacent to the Capitol Hill station; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119307 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125626July 27, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes an implementation schedule for Seattle Department of Transportation delivery of capital projects that are elements of the Center City Bike Network.Res 31826 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTraffic Safety Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Establishes an implementation schedule for Seattle Department of Transportation delivery of capital projects that are elements of the Center City Bike Network.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 30, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Center City Bike Network; establishing an implementation schedule for Seattle Department of Transportation delivery of capital projects that are elements of the Center City Bike Network; and requesting quarterly status updates to the Chair of the Sustainability and Transportation Committee through 2019.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of Seattle Public Utilities.CB 119314 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125638August 3, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of Seattle Public Utilities; and authorizing the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to grant a water utility easement to the Ryan-GHC Two, LLC, a limited liability company of the state of Delaware to use certain City of Seattle property in the Northeast Quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington for the purpose of constructing, operating, and maintaining a storm drain pipeline crossing the City of Seattle’s Bow Lake Pipeline right-of-way.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to appropriations for the Office for Civil Rights.CB 119309 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originYouth & EducationBudget & AppropriationsCivil Rights Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to appropriations for the Office for Civil Rights.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125637August 3, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationBudget & AppropriationsCivil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to appropriations for the Office for Civil Rights; amending Ordinance 125493, which amended the 2018 Budget (Ordinance 125475); and lifting a proviso imposed on the Office for Civil Rights for funding a comprehensive community-based youth diversion program by Green Sheet 97-1-B-1.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $100,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOCR. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City Light Department (“City Light”).Res 31829 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to the City Light Department (“City Light”).

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 3, 2018
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the City Light Department (“City Light”); adopting revised procedures for the disposition of surplus properties under the jurisdiction of City Light.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119320 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125633August 3, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 7137 38th Avenue Southwest.CB 119322 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 7137 38th Avenue Southwest.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125646August 17, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 7137 38th Avenue Southwest; authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $350,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119324 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125641August 17, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.CB 119313 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125653August 24, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Second Quarter 2018 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; and establishing new titles and salaries; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Human Resources. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Vacating a subterranean portion of East Howe Street between Eastlake Avenue East and Fairview Avenue East, on the petition of Bender Development….CB 119326 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating a subterranean portion of East Howe Street between Eastlake Avenue East and Fairview Avenue East, on the petition of Bender Development….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125656August 24, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating a subterranean portion of East Howe Street between Eastlake Avenue East and Fairview Avenue East, on the petition of Bender Development, LP, and Bender Equities, Inc. (Clerk File 313430).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119331 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125649August 24, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Denouncing the enormous backlog of citizenship applications before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services that is currently preventing over 18,000 immigrants in Seattle….Res 31832 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Denouncing the enormous backlog of citizenship applications before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services that is currently preventing over 18,000 immigrants in Seattle….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 24, 2018
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION denouncing the enormous backlog of citizenship applications before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services that is currently preventing over 18,000 immigrants in Seattle from becoming U.S. citizens and voters; and affirming The City of Seattle’s recognition of immigrants as New Americans who: are an integral part of Seattle’s communities; supports them as they integrate into Seattle and the nation; upholds their right and opportunity to receive fair and equal treatment in their journey to obtain legal status, including citizenship, under the U.S. Constitution, statutes, and regulations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Acknowledging the 2018 Integrated Resource Plan Progress Report as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle and the….Res 31833 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acknowledging the 2018 Integrated Resource Plan Progress Report as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle and the….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 7, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging the 2018 Integrated Resource Plan Progress Report as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle and the requirements of the State of Washington; and approving the Progress Report for the biennium September 2018 through August 2020.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119335 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125658September 7, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119336 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125659September 7, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119337 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125660September 7, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent to enter into a management agreement with the Jefferson Park Lawn Bowling Club for the purpose of renting rooms….CB 119343 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTenant ProtectionsParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent to enter into a management agreement with the Jefferson Park Lawn Bowling Club for the purpose of renting rooms….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125665September 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant ProtectionsParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent to enter into a management agreement with the Jefferson Park Lawn Bowling Club for the purpose of renting rooms and teaching lawn bowling to the public at the Jefferson Park lawn bowling facility.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $7,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing The City of Seattle’s opposition to offshore oil and gas drilling and exploration activities, including seismic airgun blasting.Res 31834 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing The City of Seattle’s opposition to offshore oil and gas drilling and exploration activities, including seismic airgun blasting.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing The City of Seattle’s opposition to offshore oil and gas drilling and exploration activities, including seismic airgun blasting.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Sustainability and Environment. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119346 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125663September 14, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to The City of Seattle’s Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP).Res 31816 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originEmergency Management Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to The City of Seattle’s Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP).

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 21, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Emergency Management
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to The City of Seattle’s Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP); adopting the CEMP Introduction, Emergency Operations Plan, Continuity of Government Plan, and Emergency Support Function #14 - Transition to Recovery, including 2017 revisions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Police Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade private utility lines under and across South Holgate Street, east of Occidental Avenue….Res 31835 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade private utility lines under and across South Holgate Street, east of Occidental Avenue….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 21, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to construct, maintain, and operate below-grade private utility lines under and across South Holgate Street, east of Occidental Avenue South and west of 3rd Avenue South; as proposed by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119358 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125666September 21, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Making a preliminary decision on the University of Washington 2018 Seattle Campus Master Plan.Res 31839 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Making a preliminary decision on the University of Washington 2018 Seattle Campus Master Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 24, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION making a preliminary decision on the University of Washington 2018 Seattle Campus Master Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests reports from the Seattle Department of Transportation, the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, and Seattle Center identifying transportation projects in….Res 31841 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests reports from the Seattle Department of Transportation, the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, and Seattle Center identifying transportation projects in….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 24, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting reports from the Seattle Department of Transportation, the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections, and Seattle Center identifying transportation projects in the vicinity of the Seattle Center Arena and describing the process for administering the Arena Access Management Plan.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating the Grand Street Commons Redevelopment Opportunity Zone pursuant to RCW 70.105D.150(1) and making findings in support of such designation.Res 31836 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originZoning Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating the Grand Street Commons Redevelopment Opportunity Zone pursuant to RCW 70.105D.150(1) and making findings in support of such designation.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the Grand Street Commons Redevelopment Opportunity Zone pursuant to RCW 70.105D.150(1) and making findings in support of such designation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOPCD. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119360 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125671October 5, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the 2019 Water System Plan.CB 119347 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the 2019 Water System Plan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125687October 10, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; adopting the 2019 Water System Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Amending and adopting the Policies and Procedures that govern the Reuse and Disposal of real property owned by The City of Seattle….Res 31837 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originAffordable HousingElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending and adopting the Policies and Procedures that govern the Reuse and Disposal of real property owned by The City of Seattle….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 10, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending and adopting the Policies and Procedures that govern the Reuse and Disposal of real property owned by The City of Seattle not subject to the City Light Department jurisdiction; updating certain portions of the procedures related to property reuse and disposal for affordable housing; and adding provisions regarding the use of proceeds from surplus property disposal.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a Settlement Agreement and associated documents extinguishing an easement on City-owned real property….CB 119361 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a Settlement Agreement and associated documents extinguishing an easement on City-owned real property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125683October 10, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Hing Hay Park and property agreements with the Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority (SCIDpda) and the City of Seattle; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a Settlement Agreement and associated documents extinguishing an easement on City-owned real property and modifying a covenant encumbering SCIDpda-owned real property; amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget; lifting a proviso; and authorizing use of certain City funds to design and construct a public restroom within the Bush Hotel building to serve users of Hing Hay Park and other members of the public.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $470,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation (DPR). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119363 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125682October 10, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119364 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125688October 19, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses “Clean Air Clean Energy” Initiative 1631, a statewide initiative to the people that would charge pollution fees on the largest corporate….Res 31843 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originClimatePollution & Environmental HealthElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Endorses “Clean Air Clean Energy” Initiative 1631, a statewide initiative to the people that would charge pollution fees on the largest corporate….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 19, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ClimatePollution & Environmental HealthElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing “Clean Air Clean Energy” Initiative 1631, a statewide initiative to the people that would charge pollution fees on the largest corporate polluters and use the revenue to invest in healthy communities, clean our air and water, promote clean energy, and slow down the impacts of climate change - all under oversight of a public board.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119365 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125689October 19, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Proclaiming that Seattle affirms the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders in the wake of increased targeting of local activists.Res 31844 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Proclaiming that Seattle affirms the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders in the wake of increased targeting of local activists.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 29, 2018
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION proclaiming that Seattle affirms the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders in the wake of increased targeting of local activists.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports Washington Initiative Measure 1639 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1639 on the November 6, 2018, general election….Res 31846 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports Washington Initiative Measure 1639 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1639 on the November 6, 2018, general election….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 29, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Washington Initiative Measure 1639 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1639 on the November 6, 2018, general election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119367 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125690November 2, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119369 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125692November 2, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Addressing the proposed Pebble Mine in Alaska’s Bristol Bay, and urging the Trump administration to undergo the appropriate environmental review, economic assessment….Res 31851 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Addressing the proposed Pebble Mine in Alaska’s Bristol Bay, and urging the Trump administration to undergo the appropriate environmental review, economic assessment….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 2, 2018
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION addressing the proposed Pebble Mine in Alaska’s Bristol Bay, and urging the Trump administration to undergo the appropriate environmental review, economic assessment, and consultation with the public to protect the wide-ranging interests in the region, including that of Seattle’s business community.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports Washington Initiative Measure 940 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 940 on the November 6, 2018, general election….Res 31850 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports Washington Initiative Measure 940 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 940 on the November 6, 2018, general election….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 2, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Washington Initiative Measure 940 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 940 on the November 6, 2018, general election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedMayor’s Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119400 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125694November 9, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Request that SPD submit monthly and quarterly reports on staffing.SLI 38-6-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 3 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD submit monthly and quarterly reports on staffing.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD submit monthly and quarterly reports on staffing

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2019 State Legislative Agenda.Res 31852 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2019 State Legislative Agenda.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2018
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2019 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119404 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125696November 16, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Committing to collaborate with the Executive on the transfer of properties that have a mutual and offsetting benefit lease to the organizations….Res 31856 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Committing to collaborate with the Executive on the transfer of properties that have a mutual and offsetting benefit lease to the organizations….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION committing to collaborate with the Executive on the transfer of properties that have a mutual and offsetting benefit lease to the organizations currently residing in those facilities no later than March 2019 in circumstances where those organizations have expressed interest in taking ownership of those properties and a commitment to continue to provide services to the community, and have demonstrated the financial capability of maintaining the facility.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125324 to amend the uses of the proceeds of the Sweetened Beverage Tax.CB 119376 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125324 to amend the uses of the proceeds of the Sweetened Beverage Tax.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125718November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the taxation of sweetened beverages; amending Ordinance 125324 to amend the uses of the proceeds of the Sweetened Beverage Tax.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes new program guidelines and an automatic carry-forward policy.CB 119378 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes new program guidelines and an automatic carry-forward policy.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125721November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Neighborhood Matching Fund Program; establishing new program guidelines and an automatic carry-forward policy.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedDON. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of water system revenue bonds for the purpose of carrying….CB 119397 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of water system revenue bonds for the purpose of carrying….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125714November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the municipal water system of The City of Seattle; authorizing the issuance and sale, from time to time in multiple series, of water system revenue bonds for the purpose of carrying out the current or advance refunding of all or a portion of the City’s outstanding water system revenue bonds pursuant to an approved refunding plan, providing for the reserve requirement, and paying the administrative costs of carrying out such refundings and paying costs of issuance of those Refunding Parity Bonds; describing the lien of those Refunding Parity Bonds; providing parameters for the bond sale terms including conditions, covenants, and other sale terms; rescinding the authorization to issue any future Refunding Parity Bonds under Ordinance 121939 (as amended by Ordinance 122837, as amended and restated by Ordinance 124339, and as further amended by Ordinance 125183); authorizing the Director of Finance to enter into agreements providing for the disposition of the Refunding Parity Bond proceeds; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedFAS/SPU. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2019.CB 119392 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2019.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125724November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2019; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Adopts revised financial policies for the Cumulative Reserve Subfund of the General Fund by amending Exhibit A of Resolution 31083.Res 31848 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts revised financial policies for the Cumulative Reserve Subfund of the General Fund by amending Exhibit A of Resolution 31083.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting revised financial policies for the Cumulative Reserve Subfund of the General Fund by amending Exhibit A of Resolution 31083.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Park District.CB 119375 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Park District.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125722November 26, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between The City of Seattle and the Seattle Park District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119409 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125697November 26, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Rejecting the Federal Administration’s proposed public charge rule change as applied to legal permanent residency applications by immigrants because of the harm….Res 31854 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Rejecting the Federal Administration’s proposed public charge rule change as applied to legal permanent residency applications by immigrants because of the harm….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 30, 2018
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION rejecting the Federal Administration’s proposed public charge rule change as applied to legal permanent residency applications by immigrants because of the harm to, negative impact on, and chilling effect on immigrant communities’ access to vital services and cost-saving initiatives that keep families healthy and on the path towards economic self-sufficiency and success.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119410 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125728November 30, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating portions of 11th Avenue Southwest, 13th Avenue Southwest, Southwest Hanford Street, and Southwest Florida Street, on the petition of the Port….CB 119413 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating portions of 11th Avenue Southwest, 13th Avenue Southwest, Southwest Hanford Street, and Southwest Florida Street, on the petition of the Port….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125734December 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating portions of 11th Avenue Southwest, 13th Avenue Southwest, Southwest Hanford Street, and Southwest Florida Street, on the petition of the Port of Seattle (Clerk File 301929) and accepting Seattle City Light easements.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an agreement with the City of Bothell for relocation….CB 119359 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an agreement with the City of Bothell for relocation….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125736December 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an agreement with the City of Bothell for relocation of approximately 0.87 mile of existing Fiber Cable 157 along SR 522 from aerial to underground as part of the City of Bothell’s SR 522 Stage 3 Improvement Project, including the execution of other agreements or amendments necessary or convenient for the completion of the joint utility trench.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $282,087. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conceptual approval of a Significant Structure Term Permit to Seattle Arena Company, LLC to construct, maintain, and operate a tunnel under….Res 31857 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval of a Significant Structure Term Permit to Seattle Arena Company, LLC to construct, maintain, and operate a tunnel under….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval of a Significant Structure Term Permit to Seattle Arena Company, LLC to construct, maintain, and operate a tunnel under and across Thomas Street, east of 1st Avenue North and west of Warren Avenue North, to enable the renovation of KeyArena at the Seattle Center.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2017-2018 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.CB 119424 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoning Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2017-2018 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125732December 14, 2018
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2017-2018 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119411 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125729December 14, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119428 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125731December 14, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Fire Chief to execute and administer, for and on behalf of The City of Seattle, an interlocal agreement with 29….CB 119431 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMSEmergency ManagementProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Fire Chief to execute and administer, for and on behalf of The City of Seattle, an interlocal agreement with 29….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125747December 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSEmergency ManagementProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Fire Department; authorizing the Fire Chief to execute and administer, for and on behalf of The City of Seattle, an interlocal agreement with 29 agencies that operate independent fire departments within King County to provide one another with automatic emergency response services under certain circumstances.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Fire Department. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service….CB 119412 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125745December 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting easements granted to The City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of hydrants, water mains, domestic meter vaults, fire service meters, and appurtenances necessary for water utility purposes at various locations in Seattle; placing the property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs.CB 119419 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125746December 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights relating to sewer and storm drain easements within Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to relinquish such easement rights and to accept new easements; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims, ordering the payment thereof and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.CB 119432 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims, ordering the payment thereof and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125737December 20, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims, ordering the payment thereof and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119433 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125738December 20, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 4451 33rd Avenue W.CB 118880 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 4451 33rd Avenue W.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125240January 6, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 4451 33rd Avenue W; authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $185,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118884 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125237January 6, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118886 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125238January 6, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118890 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125239January 6, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute an amendment that extends and modifies a certain lease agreement between The….CB 118889 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute an amendment that extends and modifies a certain lease agreement between The….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125244January 13, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute an amendment that extends and modifies a certain lease agreement between The City of Seattle and KBS SOR CENTRAL BUILDING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for office space the City leases at 810 Third Avenue; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $232,096. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118891 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as ORD 125241January 13, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Water System Improvement and Refunding….Res 31726 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Water System Improvement and Refunding….

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 13, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Water System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2017, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 125183 and in Ordinance 124339 (as amended by Ordinance 125183); confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Municipal Water System of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken and to be taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Repealing Resolution 31708 in its entirety.Res 31727 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclear Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Repealing Resolution 31708 in its entirety.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 13, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; repealing Resolution 31708 in its entirety; and confirming, ratifying and approving action taken by the Director of Finance of the City of Seattle and other City officials relating to terminating negotiations pursuant to the repealed resolution.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….Res 31728 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyOrigin unclearElectricityTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 13, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A (Multi-Modal) and Series 2017B (Multi-Modal), for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124916; authorizing the Director of Finance to execute a Continuing Covenant Agreement with the initial purchaser of such Bonds to negotiate and execute related documents and agreements from time to time in connection with the election of variable interest rate modes; and confirming, ratifying and approving action taken and to be taken by the Director of Finance of the City of Seattle and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds to the initial purchaser thereof and in connection with the election of variable interest rate modes with respect thereto throughout the term of such bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118892 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125245January 26, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118898 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125247January 26, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes and a limited purpose easement for public access, use, and maintenance.CB 118897 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes and a limited purpose easement for public access, use, and maintenance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125252February 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes and a limited purpose easement for public access, use, and maintenance; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights of way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds and easement under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the alley in Block 21, North Seattle; University Way Northeast, Northeast 50th Street, and Brooklyn Avenue Northeast abutting Block 6, University Heights; the alley in Block 24, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny (Commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 3rd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 23 and Block 51, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sara A. Bell, (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 4, University Heights; the alley in Block 12, North Seattle; the alley in Block 91, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the alley in Block 18, University Park Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Section 5, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W. M.; the alley in Block 50, Boston Co’s Plat of West Seattle; the alley in Block 15, Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle, Division Number 6; the alley in Block 2, Harvard Heights; the alley in Block 46, Central Seattle; South Holgate Street abutting Block 46, Central Seattle; the alley in Block 82, D. T. Denny’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 5, Supplemental Plat of Blocks 5-8 & 17 of Eastern Addition; the alley in Block 25, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle; the alley in Block 2, Capitol Hill Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1; the alley in Block 107, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; Mercer Street abutting Block 107, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; and public access to public benefit areas in the Yesler Terrace Community Platt as set forth in King County Recording Number 20141209001425.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Swan property in King County, Washington, the Bettys Family Trust, Bettys Trust, Crossman, Farm and Fowl….CB 118901 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Swan property in King County, Washington, the Bettys Family Trust, Bettys Trust, Crossman, Farm and Fowl….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125255February 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting statutory warranty deeds to the Swan property in King County, Washington, the Bettys Family Trust, Bettys Trust, Crossman, Farm and Fowl, LLC, Frol, James, Jones, Learned’s Little Houses, LLC, Nelson, Trowbridge, and Weatherburn properties in Skagit County, Washington, and the Watkins et al. property in Snohomish County, Washington; accepting a quit claim deed to Skagit Land Trust properties in Skagit County, for salmonid habitat protection purposes; declaring certain real property rights surplus and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purposes; ratifying the grants of Deeds of Right to the State of Washington on the Bettys Family Trust, Bettys Trust, Crossman, Frol, Jones, Nelson, and Watkins et al. properties for salmon recovery and conservation purposes; placing said lands under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $503,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118902 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125256February 2, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118906 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125258February 10, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118911 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125261February 17, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2017 Adopted Budget, 2018 Endorsed Budget, and 2017-2022 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).Res 31734 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2017 Adopted Budget, 2018 Endorsed Budget, and 2017-2022 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 24, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2017 Adopted Budget, 2018 Endorsed Budget, and 2017-2022 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a fund for the deposit of 2018 limited tax general obligation bond proceeds.CB 118917 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a fund for the deposit of 2018 limited tax general obligation bond proceeds.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125264February 24, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Treasury; creating a fund for the deposit of 2018 limited tax general obligation bond proceeds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118918 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125265February 24, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2017 Work Program.Res 31735 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Seattle City Council 2017 Work Program.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 27, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2017 Work Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the University District Urban Design Framework and identifying next steps in implementing a common vision of an eclectic, affordable, and diverse….Res 31732 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Recognizing the University District Urban Design Framework and identifying next steps in implementing a common vision of an eclectic, affordable, and diverse….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the University District Urban Design Framework and identifying next steps in implementing a common vision of an eclectic, affordable, and diverse University District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests evaluation of residential displacement as it relates to increases in development capacity in certain areas.Res 31733 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requests evaluation of residential displacement as it relates to increases in development capacity in certain areas.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting evaluation of residential displacement as it relates to increases in development capacity in certain areas; and declaring the Council’s intent to consider strategies to mitigate any loss of subsidized affordable units and naturally occurring affordable units resulting from an increase in development capacity.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to appropriations for the Human Services Department.CB 118919 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to appropriations for the Human Services Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125269March 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to appropriations for the Human Services Department; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 budget; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $125,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118920 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125270March 2, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a 12-year lease, plus an option to extend, with the West Seattle Sportsmen’s….CB 118620 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a 12-year lease, plus an option to extend, with the West Seattle Sportsmen’s….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125271March 10, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the West Seattle Stadium; and authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute a 12-year lease, plus an option to extend, with the West Seattle Sportsmen’s Club to operate the Roger Dahl Rifle Training Range at the West Seattle Stadium.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $60,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118925 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125274March 10, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118929 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125278March 17, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 118924 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125276March 17, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 5, Sorenson’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in a portion of the common elements of The Whitaker, a condominium created under the Condominium Declaration for The Whitaker, recorded under King County Recording Number 20141218000344, Records of King County, Washington; the alley in Block 65, Denny & Hoyt’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in a portion of Government Lot 2, Section 6, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, W. M. in King County, Washington (also known as Lot 1, Block 3, Midlands unrecorded plat); the alley in Block 27, North Seattle; the alley in Block 3, Columbia Terrace; the alley in Lot 12, The Longfellow Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 52, Boston Co’s Plat of West Seattle; the alley in Block 5, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 45, Central Seattle; South Holgate Street abutting Block 45, Central Seattle; the alley in Block 8, Oak Lake Villa Tracts; the alley in Block 23, South Park; the alley in Block 8, Francies R. Day’s LaGrande; the alley in Block 43, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny (Commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 15, Hall’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 15, Eastern Addition to the Town of Seattle; the alley in Block 25, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle; the alley in Block 29, North Seattle; the alley in Block 35, Second Addition to that part of the City of Seattle, as laid off by A. A. Denny and W. N. Bell (Commonly known as Bell & Denny’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 5, Highland View; and Northwest 100th Place and Northwest 100th Street abutting Lot 13, Berkeley Heights.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests the United States Congress to pass the Equality Act to ensure that federal civil rights laws are fully inclusive of protections….Res 31738 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originCivil Rights Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requests the United States Congress to pass the Equality Act to ensure that federal civil rights laws are fully inclusive of protections….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 17, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting the United States Congress to pass the Equality Act to ensure that federal civil rights laws are fully inclusive of protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity or expression.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a reciprocal easement agreement with Mercy North and Mercy South affecting portions….CB 118926 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a reciprocal easement agreement with Mercy North and Mercy South affecting portions….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125281March 31, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a reciprocal easement agreement with Mercy North and Mercy South affecting portions of Park property at Magnuson Park and adjacent property, authorizing acceptance of reimbursed City-incurred costs related to the easement agreement; superseding the requirements of Ordinance 118477, which adopted Initiative 42, for the purposes of this ordinance; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $32,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing The City of Seattle’s commitment to being a more age-friendly city under the criteria established by the World Health Organization and….Res 31739 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing The City of Seattle’s commitment to being a more age-friendly city under the criteria established by the World Health Organization and….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 31, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing The City of Seattle’s commitment to being a more age-friendly city under the criteria established by the World Health Organization and the AARP Network of Age-Friendly Communities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118933 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125283March 31, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118938 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125284March 31, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Stating the Seattle City Council’s opposition to the Keystone XL Pipeline, and requesting the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to investigate….Res 31740 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Stating the Seattle City Council’s opposition to the Keystone XL Pipeline, and requesting the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to investigate….

OutcomeAdoptedApril 10, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION stating the Seattle City Council’s opposition to the Keystone XL Pipeline, and requesting the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to investigate ways to establish contracting criteria to prioritize the City’s goals to avoid contracting with financial institutions that provide it with project-level loans or other financial services.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118941 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125286April 10, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to enter into a lease agreement with NearSU, LLC, a Washington limited liability company….CB 118936 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to enter into a lease agreement with NearSU, LLC, a Washington limited liability company….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125289April 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a lease agreement for office space; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to enter into a lease agreement with NearSU, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, for office space in the 464 12th Avenue Building to be used as the Central Customer Service Center; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125248 to modify the effective date of certain sections of that ordinance.CB 118942 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125248 to modify the effective date of certain sections of that ordinance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125292April 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125248 to modify the effective date of certain sections of that ordinance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118945 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125293April 14, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to apply for funding assistance from the Washington State Recreation….CB 118944 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to apply for funding assistance from the Washington State Recreation….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125295April 28, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities to apply for funding assistance from the Washington State Recreation Conservation Office Funding Board, to accept specified grants, and to execute, deliver, and perform corresponding agreements.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $150,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to appropriations for the Human Services Department.CB 118943 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to appropriations for the Human Services Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125294April 28, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to appropriations for the Human Services Department; amending Ordinance 125207, which adopted the 2017 budget; lifting a proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $475,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118948 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125298April 28, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118953 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125299April 28, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118955 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125300May 5, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing the City of Seattle’s intent to adopt a progressive income tax targeting high-income households.Res 31747 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing the City of Seattle’s intent to adopt a progressive income tax targeting high-income households.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 5, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Bruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the City of Seattle’s intent to adopt a progressive income tax targeting high-income households

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolution 31655.Res 31749 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31655.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 8, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31655; updating Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2016 and 2017, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ratifying and confirming an emergency order permitting temporary night shelter at 1117 Northeast Boat Street.Res 31750 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHomelessness Services Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

ratifying and confirming an emergency order permitting temporary night shelter at 1117 Northeast Boat Street.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 8, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION ratifying and confirming an emergency order permitting temporary night shelter at 1117 Northeast Boat Street.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts deeds for real property and property rights acquired in connection with the Parks and Green Spaces Levy in designated greenspaces (Arroyos….CB 118956 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts deeds for real property and property rights acquired in connection with the Parks and Green Spaces Levy in designated greenspaces (Arroyos….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125305May 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; accepting deeds for real property and property rights acquired in connection with the Parks and Green Spaces Levy in designated greenspaces (Arroyos Greenspace, Carkeek Park, Duwamish Head Greenspace, East Duwamish Greenspace, Kubota Gardens Natural Area, Lakeridge Greenspace, Leschi Natural Area, Me-Kwa-Mooks Natural Area, Northeast Queen Anne Greenbelt, Puget Creek Greenspace, Thornton Creek Natural Area, and West Duwamish Greenbelt), for park additions (Baker Park, Greenwood/Phinney RUV Park), for playgrounds (Puget Ridge Playground), and for a Conservation Easement in the Maple Leaf neighborhood of NE Seattle, all for open space, park, and recreation purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
In support of the bid by The City of Seattle to host the National League of Cities 2021 or 2024 City Summit….Res 31746 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

In support of the bid by The City of Seattle to host the National League of Cities 2021 or 2024 City Summit….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 11, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of the bid by The City of Seattle to host the National League of Cities 2021 or 2024 City Summit conference.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $400,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118966 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125310May 11, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement….Res 31751 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentOrigin unclearPermitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 17, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2017A, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement and Refunding Bonds, 2017B (Taxable), and Unlimited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 2017 for the purposes set forth in Ordinances 125197 and 121651 (as amended by Ordinance 122286 and amended and restated by Ordinance 124343); confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken and agreements entered into and to be entered into with the Seattle-Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority to provide for the refunding (pursuant to a refunding trust agreement with a refunding trustee) of certain outstanding bonds guaranteed by the City, and with the Seattle Opera for the use of bond proceeds for the replacement of the Mercer Arena; and confirming ratifying and approving the official notice of bond sale and other actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the various series of bonds to their purchasers.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares as surplus certain real property interests in Block 1, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to The City of Seattle.CB 118954 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares as surplus certain real property interests in Block 1, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to The City of Seattle.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125311May 19, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring as surplus certain real property interests in Block 1, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to The City of Seattle; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department to grant a utility easement to King County; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $55,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118970 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125312May 19, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conceptual approval to Lakefront Investors 1 LLC and Lakefront Investors 2 LLC to construct, install, and maintain four sets of private….Res 31742 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval to Lakefront Investors 1 LLC and Lakefront Investors 2 LLC to construct, install, and maintain four sets of private….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 1, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to Lakefront Investors 1 LLC and Lakefront Investors 2 LLC to construct, install, and maintain four sets of private communication conduits under and across Boren Avenue North, north of Mercer Street, and under and across the alley between Boren Avenue North and Fairview Avenue North, north of Mercer Street.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the 2013 Consolidated Plan annual action plan to reallocate funds out of homebuyer activities into rental housing activities.CB 118968 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the 2013 Consolidated Plan annual action plan to reallocate funds out of homebuyer activities into rental housing activities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125320June 1, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the use of federal HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds; amending the 2013 Consolidated Plan annual action plan to reallocate funds out of homebuyer activities into rental housing activities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $715,863. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118978 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125317June 1, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Instructing the Office of Inspector General for Public Safety and Community Police Commission to review and recommend changes to Seattle laws, policies….Res 31753 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceGovernment Accountability Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Instructing the Office of Inspector General for Public Safety and Community Police Commission to review and recommend changes to Seattle laws, policies….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 1, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to police accountability; instructing the Office of Inspector General for Public Safety and Community Police Commission to review and recommend changes to Seattle laws, policies, and practices within the scope of their expertise.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118986 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125322June 1, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the vacant property located at 8646 45th Ave S. as surplus to the City’s needs.CB 118967 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the vacant property located at 8646 45th Ave S. as surplus to the City’s needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125327June 16, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; declaring the vacant property located at 8646 45th Ave S. as surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of said property; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute all documents for the sale and transfer of the property; reserving a permanent utility easement; placing the property rights and interests conveyed by the utility easement under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and directing how proceeds from the sale shall be distributed.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $1,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118988 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125325June 16, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Drainage and Wastewater System Improvement….Res 31756 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Drainage and Wastewater System Improvement….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 16, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Drainage and Wastewater System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2017, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 125297 and in Ordinance 124338, as amended by Ordinance 124914; confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Drainage and Wastewater System of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken and to be taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118995 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125326June 16, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to meet or exceed goals established in the Paris Agreement.Res 31757 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to meet or exceed goals established in the Paris Agreement.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 16, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Office of Sustainability and Environment; affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to meet or exceed goals established in the Paris Agreement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent to amend the existing Operation and Maintenance Agreement between the Department of Parks and Recreation and the Seattle Art….CB 118979 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent to amend the existing Operation and Maintenance Agreement between the Department of Parks and Recreation and the Seattle Art….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125331June 23, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent to amend the existing Operation and Maintenance Agreement between the Department of Parks and Recreation and the Seattle Art Museum concerning their roles in operation and maintenance of portions of Alaskan Way Boulevard and Myrtle Edwards Park that are operated as part of the Olympic Sculpture Park.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the Seattle Pedestrian Master Plan.Res 31743 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the Seattle Pedestrian Master Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 23, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the Seattle Pedestrian Master Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the extension of an agreement with CHHIP approved by Ordinance 125045 for three additional months to continue funding the Capitol Hill….CB 118992 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the extension of an agreement with CHHIP approved by Ordinance 125045 for three additional months to continue funding the Capitol Hill….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125333June 23, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Capitol Hill Housing Improvement Program (CHHIP), a public corporation chartered by The City of Seattle; approving the extension of an agreement with CHHIP approved by Ordinance 125045 for three additional months to continue funding the Capitol Hill Housing Low Income Transportation Demand Management Pilot Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $11,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119000 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125335June 23, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle Education Action Plan.Res 31748 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Seattle Education Action Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 30, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle Education Action Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119003 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125336June 30, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the Community Oversight Committee and setting its membership and terms of office.Res 31759 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationGovernment Accountability Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the Community Oversight Committee and setting its membership and terms of office.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 14, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Park District; establishing the Community Oversight Committee and setting its membership and terms of office; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119016 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125340July 14, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119017 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125341July 14, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts a warranty deed for certain real property in Tract A of Fern Hill Addition of Rainier Beach.CB 118958 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts a warranty deed for certain real property in Tract A of Fern Hill Addition of Rainier Beach.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125348July 21, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Arterial Asphalt and Concrete Program; accepting a warranty deed for certain real property in Tract A of Fern Hill Addition of Rainier Beach; accepting a deed for street purposes for certain real property in the Southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian of King County, Washington; laying off, opening, widening, extending, establishing, and designating the property for street purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such deeds under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the legal description in Exhibit A to Ordinance 121706.CB 119009 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the legal description in Exhibit A to Ordinance 121706.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125352July 21, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the permission granted to Fremont Dock Co. by Ordinance 121706 to use and occupy a portion of Fremont Avenue North under the Fremont Bridge North Approach lying north of the Lake Washington Ship Canal and south of the former Burlington Northern Main Line Right-of-Way; amending the legal description in Exhibit A to Ordinance 121706; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle a statutory….CB 119011 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle a statutory….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125353July 21, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksWater & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Transportation; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle a statutory warranty deed for a portion of Tract 35A, Plat of High Point Community, recorded under King County Recording Number 20040413001567, situated in a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 24, Township 24 North, Range 3 East and a portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 24 North, Range 3 East, Willamette Meridian, from the Highpoint Natural Drainage Landscape, Open Space and Rights of Way Maintenance Association, a Washington non-profit corporation; placing the real property conveyed by such deed under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation and laying off as right-of-way; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119012 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125354July 21, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 33, Boston Co’s Plat of West Seattle; the alley in Block 21, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 23, Replat of Blocks 1, 2, 6, 7, 13, 14, and 23, North Seattle (also known of record as D. T. Denny’s Replat of Blocks 1, 2, 6, 7, 13, 14, and 23, of D. T. Denny’s 1st Addition to North Seattle); 21st Avenue Southwest abutting Block 9, Homecroft; Southwest Snoqualmie Street abutting Block 62, Boston Co’s Plat of West Seattle; the alley in Block 2, Mountain View Park Addition to the City of West Seattle; the alley in Block 15, Columbia; the alley in Block 98, D. T. Denny’s 5th Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 9, The Byron Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 3, Columbia Terrace; Midvale Avenue North abutting Block 2, Overland Park; the alley in Block 38, Addition to the City of Seattle, as laid off by D. T. Denny, Guardian of the Estate of J. H. Nagle (commonly known as Nagle’s Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 103, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 7, Francies R. Day’s LaGrande; the alley in Block 101, D. T. Denny’s 5th Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 1, Weedin’s Division of Green Lake Addition to Seattle; and Phinney Avenue North and North 90th Street abutting Block 1, Osner’s Suburban Homes.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119025 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125347July 21, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an amendment to the Transit Classification Map.Res 31755 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an amendment to the Transit Classification Map.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the 2005 Transportation Strategic Plan Update, adopted by Resolution 30790, and the Seattle Transit Plan: To Get Seattle Moving, adopted by Resolution 30799; and authorizing an amendment to the Transit Classification Map.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the extensive efforts of the Central Area community to create the 23rd Avenue Action Plan (Union-Cherry-Jackson) and Urban Design Framework (UDF)….Res 31752 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Recognizing the extensive efforts of the Central Area community to create the 23rd Avenue Action Plan (Union-Cherry-Jackson) and Urban Design Framework (UDF)….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the extensive efforts of the Central Area community to create the 23rd Avenue Action Plan (Union-Cherry-Jackson) and Urban Design Framework (UDF), the commitment and efforts of the 23rd Avenue Action Community Team (23rd Avenue ACT), for taking the lead to implement Central Area community vision and priorities as reflected by these plans, and identifying actions of the City and its partners to work with the community to implement these plans.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Identifying actions of the City and its partners that hold promise to enhance cultural identity and economic vitality, recognize history, and promote….Res 31754 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Identifying actions of the City and its partners that hold promise to enhance cultural identity and economic vitality, recognize history, and promote….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Chinatown/International District; identifying actions of the City and its partners that hold promise to enhance cultural identity and economic vitality, recognize history, and promote equitable development.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Housing Director to execute an amendment to and partial termination of the lease of City of Seattle land authorized by….CB 119026 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Housing Director to execute an amendment to and partial termination of the lease of City of Seattle land authorized by….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125366August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to property at Sand Point; authorizing the Housing Director to execute an amendment to and partial termination of the lease of City of Seattle land authorized by Ordinance 122459, as amended pursuant to Ordinance 123195, to remove two parcels from that lease; authorizing a new lease of the removed parcels to SPH Two LLLP; authorizing deeds to buildings on those parcels; authorizing related documents and actions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125205, which conditioned the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2017 grant applications and repealed Ordinance 118719.CB 119031 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125205, which conditioned the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2017 grant applications and repealed Ordinance 118719.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125367August 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125205, which conditioned the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2017 grant applications and repealed Ordinance 118719.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119033 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125369August 2, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119039 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125375August 2, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a lease agreement with Marina Management, L.L.C. for moorage improvements, maintenance, and operation of the City of Seattle’s….CB 118996 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a lease agreement with Marina Management, L.L.C. for moorage improvements, maintenance, and operation of the City of Seattle’s….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125391August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote5 in favor · 3 opposed
Parks & RecreationBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the execution of a lease agreement with Marina Management, L.L.C. for moorage improvements, maintenance, and operation of the City of Seattle’s public Leschi and Lakewood moorage facilities on Lake Washington; and amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 budget, to lift a budget proviso imposed on the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Capital Improvement Program budget in 2016 for the moorage facilities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 3 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent to enter into a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement with Seattle Public Theater for the provision of theater arts….CB 119040 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationYouth & EducationArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent to enter into a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement with Seattle Public Theater for the provision of theater arts….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125385August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationYouth & EducationArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent to enter into a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement with Seattle Public Theater for the provision of theater arts programming, education, and services at the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Green Lake Park Bathhouse Theater.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $368,280. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes new titles and/or salaries.CB 119019 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes new titles and/or salaries.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125380August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Second Quarter 2017 Employment Ordinance; establishing new titles and/or salaries; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; returning positions to Civil Service status; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the CEO/General Manager of Seattle Public Utilities to execute a contract with Cedar Grove Composting, Inc., for organic waste processing services.CB 119036 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the CEO/General Manager of Seattle Public Utilities to execute a contract with Cedar Grove Composting, Inc., for organic waste processing services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125389August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the CEO/General Manager of Seattle Public Utilities to execute a contract with Cedar Grove Composting, Inc., for organic waste processing services; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $243,671. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the 2015 Seattle Fire Code to clarify regulations, adopt amendments consistent with Washington State regulations, and make technical corrections.CB 119048 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originFire & EMS Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the 2015 Seattle Fire Code to clarify regulations, adopt amendments consistent with Washington State regulations, and make technical corrections.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125392August 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMS
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s technical codes; amending the 2015 Seattle Fire Code to clarify regulations, adopt amendments consistent with Washington State regulations, and make technical corrections; amending Section 22.600.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and requesting that the Seattle Fire Department submit code updates to the Office of the City Clerk.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Seattle Parks and Recreation 2017 Parks Development Plan (hereafter referred to as the 2017 Parks and Open Space Plan).Res 31763 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Seattle Parks and Recreation 2017 Parks Development Plan (hereafter referred to as the 2017 Parks and Open Space Plan).

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting Seattle Parks and Recreation 2017 Parks Development Plan (hereafter referred to as the 2017 Parks and Open Space Plan); and authorizing the Department of Parks and Recreation to submit the plan to the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119047 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125377August 18, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the redevelopment of KeyArena into a first-class, state-of-the-art, multi-purpose entertainment and sport center (the “Arena”) at Seattle Center.Res 31764 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective BargainingArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the redevelopment of KeyArena into a first-class, state-of-the-art, multi-purpose entertainment and sport center (the “Arena”) at Seattle Center.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 18, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez, Bruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective BargainingArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the redevelopment of KeyArena into a first-class, state-of-the-art, multi-purpose entertainment and sport center (the “Arena”) at Seattle Center; supporting The City of Seattle negotiating with Oak View Group, LLC (OVG) regarding the possible redevelopment and operation of the Arena at Seattle Center; and requesting the Mayor to negotiate a memorandum of understanding with OVG for the City Council’s consideration and action.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119053 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125388August 18, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to grant two easements to the State….CB 119042 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to grant two easements to the State….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125398September 8, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to grant two easements to the State of Washington over and under a portion of real property known as Fire Station 22; and authorizing the Director of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of The City of Seattle two easements from the State of Washington over a portion of State right of way, and to place the property rights granted to the City under the jurisdiction of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $19,863. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119060 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125395September 8, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119061 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125396September 8, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119067 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125397September 8, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolution 31754, incorporating Filipino Town, and recognizing the important history and contributions of Filipino-Americans to the City of Seattle.Res 31769 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31754, incorporating Filipino Town, and recognizing the important history and contributions of Filipino-Americans to the City of Seattle.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 8, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Rob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Chinatown/International District; amending Resolution 31754, incorporating Filipino Town, and recognizing the important history and contributions of Filipino-Americans to the City of Seattle.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement with the Seward Park Clay Studio, Inc. for the provision of visual….CB 119041 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationYouth & EducationArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement with the Seward Park Clay Studio, Inc. for the provision of visual….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125404September 12, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationYouth & EducationArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the execution of a Use, Occupancy and Maintenance Agreement with the Seward Park Clay Studio, Inc. for the provision of visual arts programming, education, and services at the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Seward Park Bathhouse.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $29,180. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119074 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125400September 12, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Improvement….Res 31771 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Improvement….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 13, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2017C, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 125198 and in Ordinance 124335 (as amended by Ordinance 124916); confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Light System of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken and to be taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department.CB 119056 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125412September 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department; authorizing the partial release of a City Light easement; and accepting the payment of fair market value for the partial release of easement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $31,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conceptual approval to City Investors XXV LLC to construct, install, and maintain two sets of private communication conduits under and across….Res 31767 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval to City Investors XXV LLC to construct, install, and maintain two sets of private communication conduits under and across….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to City Investors XXV LLC to construct, install, and maintain two sets of private communication conduits under and across 8th Avenue North, south of Harrison Street and north of Thomas Street.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants MCP Alley24 East, LLC, permission to maintain and operate a skybridge over and across the alley in the block bordered by….CB 119068 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants MCP Alley24 East, LLC, permission to maintain and operate a skybridge over and across the alley in the block bordered by….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125407September 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting MCP Alley24 East, LLC, permission to maintain and operate a skybridge over and across the alley in the block bordered by Pontius Avenue North and Yale Avenue North, and John Street and Thomas Street; amending Ordinance 122113, updating the insurance and bond requirements, amending the annual fee and other terms and conditions of the permit, renewing the term of the permit, and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $11,424. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 119058 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125413September 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to public defense legal services.CB 119073 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to public defense legal services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125411September 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to public defense legal services; and authorizing an interlocal agreement with King County for public defense legal services.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of a Restrictive Covenant, Easement and Circulation Agreement with 225 Roy LLC for the coordinated development of the parties’….CB 119070 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of a Restrictive Covenant, Easement and Circulation Agreement with 225 Roy LLC for the coordinated development of the parties’….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125406September 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the redevelopment of certain City-owned real property across from the Seattle Center campus; authorizing the execution of a Restrictive Covenant, Easement and Circulation Agreement with 225 Roy LLC for the coordinated development of the parties’ adjacent properties; authorizing the execution of a quitclaim deed to a portion of the City property to 225 Roy LLC in exchange for an easement providing that the property be used and maintained as publicly accessible open space, in perpetuity; and authorizing the Director of the Seattle Center Department to execute documents and take other actions in connection with this matter.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the 2015 Seattle Building Code as adopted by Ordinance 125161.CB 119071 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the 2015 Seattle Building Code as adopted by Ordinance 125161.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125409September 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending the 2015 Seattle Building Code as adopted by Ordinance 125161; classifying art galleries as assembly or mercantile occupancies depending on floor area.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the 2015 Seattle Building, Existing Building, Residential, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Energy Codes to clarify regulations, adopt amendments consistent with Washington State….CB 119072 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the 2015 Seattle Building, Existing Building, Residential, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Energy Codes to clarify regulations, adopt amendments consistent with Washington State….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125410September 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle’s technical codes; amending the 2015 Seattle Building, Existing Building, Residential, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Energy Codes to clarify regulations, adopt amendments consistent with Washington State regulations, and make technical corrections; amending Sections 22.100.010 and 22.150.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code; and requesting that the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections submit code updates to the Office of the City Clerk.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to grant a revised easement for access purposes over a portion of the City’s….CB 119076 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to grant a revised easement for access purposes over a portion of the City’s….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125414September 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to grant a revised easement for access purposes over a portion of the City’s fee-owned real property in the vicinity of East Marginal Way South and Duwamish Avenue South to JMDH Real Estate of Seattle, LLC; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119084 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125405September 21, 2017
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing the Seattle City Council’s support for a single-payer healthcare system (“Medicare for All”), supporting United States Senate Bill 1804, and requesting….Res 31774 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originPublic Health Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing the Seattle City Council’s support for a single-payer healthcare system (“Medicare for All”), supporting United States Senate Bill 1804, and requesting….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 21, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Public Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the Seattle City Council’s support for a single-payer healthcare system (“Medicare for All”), supporting United States Senate Bill 1804, and requesting the support of Washington’s U.S. Senators.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the selection of a Chair, Vice-Chairs, and membership for the Select Budget Committee in 2017.Res 31776 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the selection of a Chair, Vice-Chairs, and membership for the Select Budget Committee in 2017.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 25, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the selection of a Chair, Vice-Chairs, and membership for the Select Budget Committee in 2017.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2016-2017 and superseding Resolution 31644.Res 31777 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2016-2017 and superseding Resolution 31644.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 25, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2016-2017 and superseding Resolution 31644.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the 20-day procedural process pursuant to City Charter Article XIX for filling the vacancy in Council Position 8 until certification of….Res 31778 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the 20-day procedural process pursuant to City Charter Article XIX for filling the vacancy in Council Position 8 until certification of….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 25, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the 20-day procedural process pursuant to City Charter Article XIX for filling the vacancy in Council Position 8 until certification of the November 2017 election results for Position 8.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of….CB 119085 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125421September 29, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of The City of Seattle, an Aquatic Lands Lease for Seattle’s Waterfront Parks; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Relations to enter into agreements with King County and the cities located within King….CB 119078 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Relations to enter into agreements with King County and the cities located within King….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125420September 29, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Historic Seattle Preservation and Development Authority (“HSPDA”), a public corporation chartered by The City of Seattle; authorizing the Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Relations to enter into agreements with King County and the cities located within King County to permit HSPDA to exercise its chartered authority in such jurisdictions using Preservation Action Fund proceeds; authorizing the Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Relations, after receiving authorization by resolution, to enter into future agreements with King County and other cities located in King County consenting to a request from HSPDA to exercise its chartered authority in such jurisdictions; and extending the City’s powers, authorities, and rights regarding public corporations and authorities beyond the city limits for the projects within HSPDA’s chartered authority.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119089 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125423September 29, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Strengthening public safety by affirming the City’s support for immigrant and refugee witnesses, survivors, and victims of crime.Res 31775 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Strengthening public safety by affirming the City’s support for immigrant and refugee witnesses, survivors, and victims of crime.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 3, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION strengthening public safety by affirming the City’s support for immigrant and refugee witnesses, survivors, and victims of crime.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2016-2017 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.CB 119027 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2016-2017 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125428October 5, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2016-2017 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a license agreement with the Department of the….CB 119092 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a license agreement with the Department of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125427October 5, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute a license agreement with the Department of the Army for the City’s continued use of an approximately 13,000 square-foot warehouse facility at 1555 Alaskan Way South for the operation of the St. Martin de Porres shelter for homeless men over the age of 50, and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Relations to enter into agreements with King County, the cities of Bellevue, Federal Way….CB 119077 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Relations to enter into agreements with King County, the cities of Bellevue, Federal Way….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125424October 5, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Capitol Hill Housing Improvement Program (“CHHIP”), a public corporation chartered by The City of Seattle; authorizing the Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Relations to enter into agreements with King County, the cities of Bellevue, Federal Way, Issaquah, Kent, Kirkland, Mercer Island, Redmond, Renton, SeaTac, Shoreline, and Tukwila to permit CHHIP to exercise its chartered authority in such jurisdictions; authorizing the Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Relations, after receiving authorization by resolution, to enter into future agreements with other cities located in King County consenting to a request from CHHIP to exercise its chartered authority in such city; and extending the City’s powers, authorities and rights regarding public corporations and authorities beyond the city limits for the projects within CHHIP’s chartered authority.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119094 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125426October 5, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates an Arts & Cultural District in the Uptown neighborhood of Seattle.Res 31766 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates an Arts & Cultural District in the Uptown neighborhood of Seattle.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 11, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION creating an Arts & Cultural District in the Uptown neighborhood of Seattle.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Calling for additional actions by the City and its partners to advance the vision of the Uptown Urban Design Framework, leverage new….Res 31772 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Calling for additional actions by the City and its partners to advance the vision of the Uptown Urban Design Framework, leverage new….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 11, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for additional actions by the City and its partners to advance the vision of the Uptown Urban Design Framework, leverage new investments at Seattle Center to support mobility and promote livability in the Uptown Urban Center as both Uptown and Seattle Center grow, and to update the Seattle Center Century 21 Master Plan.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119095 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125434October 13, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119096 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125435October 27, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119097 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125436October 27, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119121 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125437November 3, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119127 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125439November 9, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Adopts a 2018-2023 Strategic Business Plan Update for Seattle Public Utilities.Res 31760 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2018-2023 Strategic Business Plan Update for Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 17, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Public Utilities; adopting a 2018-2023 Strategic Business Plan Update for Seattle Public Utilities; and endorsing a six-year rate path to support the Strategic Business Plan Update.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119133 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125440November 17, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Urging the President of the United States and the United States Congress to enact legislation securing the citizenship of internationally adopted adult….Res 31781 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Urging the President of the United States and the United States Congress to enact legislation securing the citizenship of internationally adopted adult….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 20, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION urging the President of the United States and the United States Congress to enact legislation securing the citizenship of internationally adopted adult individuals.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a process by which the City of Seattle will determine new progressive revenues including an Employee Hours Tax, expressing the City….Res 31782 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a process by which the City of Seattle will determine new progressive revenues including an Employee Hours Tax, expressing the City….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 20, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a process by which the City of Seattle will determine new progressive revenues including an Employee Hours Tax, expressing the City Council’s intent to impose such potential revenues, and expressing the City Council’s intent to make investments with these revenues that would assist people who are homeless or at a high risk of becoming homeless in obtaining and retaining stable housing

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2018.CB 119116 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2018.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125475November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2018; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Establishes the 2018 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.CB 119108 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the 2018 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125453November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; establishing the 2018 fee schedule for the use of park properties and other park and recreation facilities and services; and superseding previous park and recreation fee schedules.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 121176 to remove certain performance pay provisions.CB 119115 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 121176 to remove certain performance pay provisions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125469November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Ordinance 121176 to remove certain performance pay provisions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $340,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a public purpose and authorizing the Director of the Office of Planning and Community Development to execute funding agreements for and….CB 119128 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a public purpose and authorizing the Director of the Office of Planning and Community Development to execute funding agreements for and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125473November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Equitable Development Initiative; establishing a public purpose and authorizing the Director of the Office of Planning and Community Development to execute funding agreements for and on behalf of the City related to implementation of the Equitable Development Initiative.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes an interfund loan from the Housing Incentive Subfund of the Office of Housing Fund to the General Subfund Fund.CB 119132 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an interfund loan from the Housing Incentive Subfund of the Office of Housing Fund to the General Subfund Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125463November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of certain general government programs; authorizing an interfund loan from the Housing Incentive Subfund of the Office of Housing Fund to the General Subfund Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the financing of 2018 activities evaluating effects of the Sweetened Beverage Tax, and authorizing an interfund loan from the Revenue Stabilization….CB 119134 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the financing of 2018 activities evaluating effects of the Sweetened Beverage Tax, and authorizing an interfund loan from the Revenue Stabilization….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125465November 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of 2018 activities evaluating effects of the Sweetened Beverage Tax, and authorizing an interfund loan from the Revenue Stabilization Fund (00166) to the General Fund (00100) in the amount of $500,000.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119139 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125446November 28, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119143 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125478November 28, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
In support of the Seattle AIDS Legacy Memorial.Res 31783 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

In support of the Seattle AIDS Legacy Memorial.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 28, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION in support of the Seattle AIDS Legacy Memorial.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,017. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2018 State Legislative Agenda.Res 31787 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2018 State Legislative Agenda.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 8, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2018 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119148 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125482December 8, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves correction of the Property Use and Development Agreement (PUDA) approved by Ordinance 125394 for property located at 1203 East Spruce Street.CB 119161 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves correction of the Property Use and Development Agreement (PUDA) approved by Ordinance 125394 for property located at 1203 East Spruce Street.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125487December 11, 2017
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE approving correction of the Property Use and Development Agreement (PUDA) approved by Ordinance 125394 for property located at 1203 East Spruce Street; and accepting a Corrected PUDA.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2018-2019 and superseding Resolution 31777.Res 31790 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2018-2019 and superseding Resolution 31777.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 11, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2018-2019 and superseding Resolution 31777.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Superseding Resolution 31643.Res 31789 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Superseding Resolution 31643.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 11, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2018 and 2019; and superseding Resolution 31643.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 119162 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125496December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the alignment, station locations, and maintenance base location for Sound Transit’s Central Link, University Link, Northgate Link Extension, East Link, and….Res 31784 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the alignment, station locations, and maintenance base location for Sound Transit’s Central Link, University Link, Northgate Link Extension, East Link, and….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the alignment, station locations, and maintenance base location for Sound Transit’s Central Link, University Link, Northgate Link Extension, East Link, and Lynnwood Link Extension light rail lines in The City of Seattle; and superseding the alignment, station locations, and maintenance base location approved in Resolution 31465.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an amendment to the “Agreement between the City of Seattle and….CB 119151 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an amendment to the “Agreement between the City of Seattle and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125500December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit); authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation to execute an amendment to the “Agreement between the City of Seattle and Sound Transit for Grant of Non-Exclusive Use of a Light Rail Transit Way as related to the Link Light Rail Transit Project” to reflect the approved alignment for the Link Light Rail Transit Project, including addition of the portion of the Lynnwood Link Extension located within The City of Seattle; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Citipoint Church, GKI Properties, LLC, the Martin, Nelson, Taylor, and Voegtlin-Anderson properties in Skagit County, Washington….CB 119163 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Citipoint Church, GKI Properties, LLC, the Martin, Nelson, Taylor, and Voegtlin-Anderson properties in Skagit County, Washington….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125497December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting statutory warranty deeds to the Citipoint Church, GKI Properties, LLC, the Martin, Nelson, Taylor, and Voegtlin-Anderson properties in Skagit County, Washington, the Crawley and Wright properties in Snohomish County, Washington, and a treasurer’s deed for a Skagit County property in Skagit County, all for salmonid habitat protection purposes; declaring certain real property rights surplus and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purposes; ratifying the grants of Deeds of Right to the State of Washington on the Crawley, GKI Properties, LLC, and Voegtlin-Anderson properties for salmon recovery and conservation purposes; placing said lands under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $343,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of two memoranda of understanding between The City of Seattle and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77….CB 119160 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of two memoranda of understanding between The City of Seattle and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125489December 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; authorizing the execution of two memoranda of understanding between The City of Seattle and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 77 to be effective January 23, 2017, through January 22, 2021; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $44. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the Mayor’s execution of a Partnering Agreement with Sound Transit to implement light rail extensions between Ballard and West Seattle as….Res 31788 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitProcurement & ContractsElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming the Mayor’s execution of a Partnering Agreement with Sound Transit to implement light rail extensions between Ballard and West Seattle as….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 15, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitProcurement & ContractsElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (“Sound Transit”); affirming the Mayor’s execution of a Partnering Agreement with Sound Transit to implement light rail extensions between Ballard and West Seattle as approved by regional voters under Sound Transit 3.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 119164 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125488December 15, 2017
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2016 and 2017, and….Res 31643 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2016 and 2017, and….

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 5, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to committee structure, membership, meeting times, and duties of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2016 and 2017, and superseding Resolution 31499.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2016-2017 and superseding Resolution 31497.Res 31644 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2016-2017 and superseding Resolution 31497.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 5, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION designating the monthly President Pro Tem of the City Council of The City of Seattle for 2016-2017 and superseding Resolution 31497.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2016 and 2017, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees….Res 31645 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2016 and 2017, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees….

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 5, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2016 and 2017, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees, and superseding Resolution 31498.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
AN ORDINANCE, relating to City employment, to be known as the Pay Zone Ordinance.CB 118602 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originZoningCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

AN ORDINANCE, relating to City employment, to be known as the Pay Zone Ordinance.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124974January 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE, relating to City employment, to be known as the Pay Zone Ordinance; adjusting the pay zone structures for the City’s discretionary pay programs; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118599 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124970January 14, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118600 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124971January 14, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118601 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124972January 14, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118605 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124973January 14, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….Res 31646 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 14, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue Bonds, 2016A (Taxable New Clean Renewable Energy Bonds - Direct Payment), as authorized by Ordinance 124916, and Municipal Light and Power Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2016B, for the purpose of refunding certain outstanding bonds of the Light System as authorized by Ordinance 124335 (as amended by Ordinance 124916); designating the 2016A Bonds as new clean renewable energy bonds for purposes of claiming certain federal Tax Credit Subsidy Payments; establishing the Reserve Fund Requirement for the Bonds and supplementing Resolution 31593 to amend the Reserve Fund Requirement with respect to certain previously issued municipal light and power revenue bonds; amending Resolution 31105 relating to the Refunded Bonds to make a technical correction; and confirming, ratifying and approving action taken and to be taken by the Director of Finance and other City officials to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Light System of the City and to provide for the issuance and sale of the Bonds to the purchasers thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the Mayoral Civil Emergency Order Addressing Encampments and Vehicles Used As Residences of January 19, 2016.Res 31649 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies the Mayoral Civil Emergency Order Addressing Encampments and Vehicles Used As Residences of January 19, 2016.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION modifying the Mayoral Civil Emergency Order Addressing Encampments and Vehicles Used As Residences of January 19, 2016.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Cargile, Delay, Edwards, Jacobs, King-Smith, Lonesome Valley L. L. C., Macomber, Russell, Watson, and Wolf properties….CB 118607 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts statutory warranty deeds to the Cargile, Delay, Edwards, Jacobs, King-Smith, Lonesome Valley L. L. C., Macomber, Russell, Watson, and Wolf properties….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124981January 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting statutory warranty deeds to the Cargile, Delay, Edwards, Jacobs, King-Smith, Lonesome Valley L. L. C., Macomber, Russell, Watson, and Wolf properties in Skagit County, Washington, and the Jarvis and Mitchell, et al., properties in Snohomish County, for salmonid habitat protection purposes; declaring certain real property rights surplus and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purpose; ratifying a Boundary Line Agreement for the Anderson Creek property in Skagit County, Washington for salmon habitat protection purposes; ratifying the grants of Deeds of Right to the State of Washington on the Cargile, Delay, Edwards, Jarvis, King-Smith, Lonesome Valley L. L. C., Mitchell et al., and Watson properties for salmon recovery and conservation purposes; placing said lands under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $710,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118608 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124980January 29, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118609 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124982January 29, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118614 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124983February 5, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating the properties for street purposes.CB 118613 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating the properties for street purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124991February 11, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to city-owned property under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation in Blocks 2 and 7, Steel Plant Addition to the City of Seattle, Block 6, Smith’s Replat of Lots 11 to 20 Block 1 Steel Plant Addition to the City of Seattle, and Blocks 54 and 55, Homecroft Addition to the City of Seattle; designating the properties for street purposes; and laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of Delridge Way Southwest, Southwest Orchard Street, and Dumar Way Southwest.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.CB 118611 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Provides for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124986February 11, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the permission granted to Fremont Dock Co. by Ordinance 121706 to use and occupy a portion of Fremont Avenue North under the Fremont Bridge North Approach lying north of the Lake Washington Ship Canal and south of the former Burlington Northern Main Line Right-of-Way; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; amending Ordinance 121706, repealing Exhibit A to Ordinance 121706, and adopting a new Attachment A to Ordinance 121706; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds and easements for street or alley purposes.CB 118615 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds and easements for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124988February 11, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds and easements for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds and easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 3, Hillman’s Lake Front Addition to The City of Seattle, Division No. 3; Northwest 43rd Street, Northwest 45th Street, and 8th Avenue Northwest abutting Block 19, Denny’s Addition to Ballard and Seattle, and Block 176, Gilman Park; Burlington Northern Railroad Company’s right-of-way abutting the Southwest quarter of Section 11, Township 25 North, Range 3 East, W. M., King County, Washington; Aloha Street and Minor Avenue North abutting Block 4, Supplementary Plat of D. T. Denny’s Second Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 44, Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid out by A. A. Denny (commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to The City of Seattle); the alley in Block 60, H. W. Treat’s 1st Addition to the City of Ballard; the alley in Block 10, Commercial Street Steam Motor Addition to The City of Seattle; the alley in Block 47, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny (commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to The City of Seattle); the alley in Block 85, D. T. Denny’s Home Addition to The City of Seattle; the alley in Block 3, Scenic Park Addition; the alley in Block 86, D.T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 3, Columbia Terrace; the alley in Block 3, Thompson’s University Addition to King County; the alley in Block 107, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; North 34th Street and Burke Avenue North abutting Block 76, Lake Union Addition to The City of Seattle; the alley in Block 34, Denny and Hoyt’s Addition to The City of Seattle; the alley in Block 7, Licton Springs Park; the alley in Block 60, H. W. Treat’s 1st Addition to the City of Ballard; the alley in Blocks 88 and 89, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; and Southwest 105th Street abutting Lots 1 through 5, Fern Hill Acre Tracts, vacated 37th Avenue Southwest, and the North half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 2, Township 23 North, Range 3 East, W. M., King County, Washington.)

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 118616 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124989February 11, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 26, North Seattle; the alleys in Block 42 and Block 51, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (Deceased) (commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to The City of Seattle); the alley in Block 45, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny (commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to The City of Seattle); North 34th Street abutting Block 68, Lake Union Addition to The City of Seattle; the alley in Block 4, South Park; South State Street abutting Lot 21, Sander’s Supplemental Plat; the alley in Block 7, Francies R. Day’s LaGrande; the alley in Block 7, Burke’s Second Addition to The City of Seattle; the alley in Block 10, C. P. Stone’s Extension of Edgewater Addition to The City of Seattle; the alley in Block 1, Greenwood Park Addition to The City of Seattle; the alley in Block 10, Edgewater Addition to The City of Seattle; the alley in the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 18, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, W. M.; the alley in Block 29, Gilman Park; 42nd Avenue South and South Trenton Street abutting Tract 9, Lake Dell and Parcels A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I, City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 2008281, recorded under Recording No. 20020211900002; Northeast 95th Street abutting Parcels A, B, C, and D of City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3015821, recorded under Recording No. 20140212900006 (also known as Acre 2 and Acre 3, Vacated Block 57, Maple Leaf Addition to Green Lake Circle); the alley in Block 3, Columbia Terrace; the alley in Unit Lots Y and Z, City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 3016224, recorded December 12, 2014, under King County Recording Number 20141212900005 (also known as Block 5, Burke & Farrar’s Fifth Addition to The City of Seattle; and the alley in Unit Lots Y and Z, City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 3016239, recorded December 12, 2014, under Recording Number 20141212900004 (also known as Block 5, Burke & Farrar’s Fifth Addition to The City of Seattle).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118621 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124984February 11, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118624 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124992February 18, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the sale of said property.CB 118622 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the sale of said property.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124996February 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, declaring the vacant property located at 10610 55th Ave. S. as surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of said property; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute all documents for the sale and transfer of the property; and directing how proceeds from the sale shall be distributed.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $5,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118625 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124995February 29, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Transportation to enter into a lease agreement with the National Railroad Passenger Corporation for Amtrak’s continued use and….CB 118626 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Transportation to enter into a lease agreement with the National Railroad Passenger Corporation for Amtrak’s continued use and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125004March 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation; authorizing the Director of Transportation to enter into a lease agreement with the National Railroad Passenger Corporation for Amtrak’s continued use and occupancy of a portion of King Street Station to provide passenger rail services.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $183,520. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118632 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124997March 10, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118635 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125001March 10, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent (SLIs) for the 2016 Adopted Budget and 2016-2021 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).Res 31653 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent (SLIs) for the 2016 Adopted Budget and 2016-2021 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting Statements of Legislative Intent (SLIs) for the 2016 Adopted Budget and 2016-2021 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves an amendment of the Property Use and Development Agreement approved by Ordinance 123923 for property located at 3902 S. Ferdinand Street.CB 118637 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves an amendment of the Property Use and Development Agreement approved by Ordinance 123923 for property located at 3902 S. Ferdinand Street.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125007March 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE approving an amendment of the Property Use and Development Agreement approved by Ordinance 123923 for property located at 3902 S. Ferdinand Street.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolution 31645.Res 31655 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolution 31645.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolution 31645; updating Seattle City Councilmember participation, for 2016 and 2017, on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the Seattle City Council 2016 Work Program.Res 31656 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the Seattle City Council 2016 Work Program.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Seattle City Council 2016 Work Program.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Office for Civil Rights or her designee to execute an agreement with the Social Justice Fund, a….CB 118636 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originYouth & EducationBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Office for Civil Rights or her designee to execute an agreement with the Social Justice Fund, a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125010March 25, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Mike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to civil rights; authorizing the Director of the Office for Civil Rights or her designee to execute an agreement with the Social Justice Fund, a Washington non-profit, to provide services relating to zero youth detention projects; amending Ordinance 124927 by lifting a budget proviso; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $600,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118640 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125008March 25, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118642 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125012March 25, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118650 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125013April 1, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing the City’s support for an effective, countywide safe prescription drug disposal program, including controlled substances, and requesting local pharmacies and the….Res 31654 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolice Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing the City’s support for an effective, countywide safe prescription drug disposal program, including controlled substances, and requesting local pharmacies and the….

OutcomeAdoptedApril 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the City’s support for an effective, countywide safe prescription drug disposal program, including controlled substances, and requesting local pharmacies and the Seattle Police Department to install drug disposal drop-boxes across the City.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118653 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125019April 14, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118659 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125025April 14, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Retiring introduced and referred Council Bills, Resolutions, and Clerk Files which have received no further action.Res 31658 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Retiring introduced and referred Council Bills, Resolutions, and Clerk Files which have received no further action.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 18, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION retiring introduced and referred Council Bills, Resolutions, and Clerk Files which have received no further action.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118660 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125026April 21, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of an amendment to the existing one-year pilot Activation and Programming Agreement for Westlake Park and Occidental Square Park….CB 118662 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of an amendment to the existing one-year pilot Activation and Programming Agreement for Westlake Park and Occidental Square Park….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125030April 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the execution of an amendment to the existing one-year pilot Activation and Programming Agreement for Westlake Park and Occidental Square Park with DBIA Services; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing The City of Seattle’s fervent support for the designation of the area around the Stonewall Inn as a National Monument to….Res 31660 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing The City of Seattle’s fervent support for the designation of the area around the Stonewall Inn as a National Monument to….

OutcomeAdoptedApril 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing The City of Seattle’s fervent support for the designation of the area around the Stonewall Inn as a National Monument to be administered under the purview of the National Parks Service.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118665 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125033April 29, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Increasing the number of Legislative Assistant positions.CB 118664 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Increasing the number of Legislative Assistant positions.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125032May 2, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Legislative Department staff; increasing the number of Legislative Assistant positions; amending Ordinance 118851; and amending the Legislative Assistant Compensation Plan Administrative Guidelines.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 31659 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION revising certain General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; amending Attachment 1 of Resolution 31639, Section XI.D.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement….Res 31665 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 3, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement and Refunding Bonds, 2016A and Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2016B (Taxable) for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124924 and in Ordinance 121651 (as amended by Ordinance 122286 and amended and restated by Ordinance 124343); confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding general obligation bonds of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides for the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2016.Res 31666 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureOrigin unclearBridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Provides for the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2016.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 3, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2016; specifying the amounts, maturities, interest rates and other terms of the bonds; providing for the application of bond proceeds to pay or reimburse all or part of the costs related to the design, construction, renovation, improvement and replacement of the seawall and associated public infrastructure, and the payment of the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; and ratifying, confirming and approving the notice of bond sale and the actions of the Director of Finance relating to the sale of the bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to Directed Investigations, which are investigations of potential labor law violations initiated by the Director of the Office of Labor Standards.Res 31662 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to Directed Investigations, which are investigations of potential labor law violations initiated by the Director of the Office of Labor Standards.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 4, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to Directed Investigations, which are investigations of potential labor law violations initiated by the Director of the Office of Labor Standards; and requesting quarterly updates to the Council starting the end of the second quarter of 2016 on the development steps necessary to implement Directed Investigations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118666 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125034May 4, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares The City of Seattle’s intention to conduct a public hearing concerning the assumption of the rights, powers, functions, and obligations of….Res 31663 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares The City of Seattle’s intention to conduct a public hearing concerning the assumption of the rights, powers, functions, and obligations of….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 9, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring The City of Seattle’s intention to conduct a public hearing concerning the assumption of the rights, powers, functions, and obligations of the Seattle Transportation Benefit District by The City of Seattle.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118677 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125036May 17, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves and confirming the plat of “Kubota East” in the portions of Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 23….CB 118673 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves and confirming the plat of “Kubota East” in the portions of Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 23….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125039May 27, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE approving and confirming the plat of “Kubota East” in the portions of Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, Washington.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to enter into an agreement with CHHIP to fund the Capitol Hill Housing Low….CB 118681 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to enter into an agreement with CHHIP to fund the Capitol Hill Housing Low….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125045May 27, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Capitol Hill Housing Improvement Program (CHHIP), a public corporation chartered by The City of Seattle; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to enter into an agreement with CHHIP to fund the Capitol Hill Housing Low Income Transportation Demand Management Pilot Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $38,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinances 124509 and 124749, by amending the action plan and the implementation plan.CB 118679 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinances 124509 and 124749, by amending the action plan and the implementation plan.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125044May 27, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Preschool Program; amending Ordinances 124509 and 124749, by amending the action plan and the implementation plan; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118684 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125038May 27, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118685 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125047May 27, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates Sound Transit, providing recommendations to the Sound Transit Board as to the content of the proposed Sound Transit 3 (ST3) ballot….Res 31668 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates Sound Transit, providing recommendations to the Sound Transit Board as to the content of the proposed Sound Transit 3 (ST3) ballot….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 27, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Sound Transit, providing recommendations to the Sound Transit Board as to the content of the proposed Sound Transit 3 (ST3) ballot measure to be submitted to the voters in November 2016.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Neighborhoods to enter into a memorandum of understanding with Historic Seattle Preservation and Development Authority….CB 118680 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCollective BargainingNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Neighborhoods to enter into a memorandum of understanding with Historic Seattle Preservation and Development Authority….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125048June 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCollective BargainingNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Washington Hall; authorizing the Director of the Department of Neighborhoods to enter into a memorandum of understanding with Historic Seattle Preservation and Development Authority to provide funds for improvements to Washington Hall.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Stating The City of Seattle’s support for clean and safe electricity production and opposition to the use of fossil fuels and new….Res 31667 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Stating The City of Seattle’s support for clean and safe electricity production and opposition to the use of fossil fuels and new….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION stating The City of Seattle’s support for clean and safe electricity production and opposition to the use of fossil fuels and new nuclear energy in the generation of electricity, and requiring an ongoing evaluation of existing nuclear power generation on the basis of health, safety, reliability, and cost; and instructing that The City of Seattle’s City Light Department reflect this position in its policies and interactions with other utilities, federal and state agencies, and organizations of which it is a member or participant.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118695 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125049June 10, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses a public health and public safety model to address the needs of people living in the I-5 East Duwamish Greenbelt (Greenbelt)….Res 31671 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPolicePublic HealthNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Endorses a public health and public safety model to address the needs of people living in the I-5 East Duwamish Greenbelt (Greenbelt)….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
PolicePublic HealthNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing a public health and public safety model to address the needs of people living in the I-5 East Duwamish Greenbelt (Greenbelt) and in the adjoining neighborhoods; devising a person-centered and strategic approach that prioritizes the offer of services and housing options to individuals based on their needs before the removal of persons or property from the Greenbelt; providing safety for police, fire fighters, and first responders who provide emergency services within and around the Greenbelt; and directing the physical cleanup of the Greenbelt to provide a healthier and safer environment for all.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Addressing the retirement security crisis.Res 31672 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Addressing the retirement security crisis.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 13, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION addressing the retirement security crisis.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Drainage and Wastewater System Improvement….Res 31674 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Drainage and Wastewater System Improvement….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 14, 2016
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Drainage and Wastewater System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2016, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124914 and in Ordinance 124338, as amended by Ordinance 124914; confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Drainage and Wastewater System of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken and to be taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports the renaming of “International Children’s Park” to “Donnie Chin International Children’s Park.”.Res 31670 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports the renaming of “International Children’s Park” to “Donnie Chin International Children’s Park.”.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting the renaming of “International Children’s Park” to “Donnie Chin International Children’s Park.”

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation Department to execute, accept and record a Restrictive Covenant, Easement and Contract Concerning Real Property….CB 118691 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation Department to execute, accept and record a Restrictive Covenant, Easement and Contract Concerning Real Property….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125055June 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation Department to execute, accept and record a Restrictive Covenant, Easement and Contract Concerning Real Property on behalf of The City of Seattle; placing the property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of the Department of Parks and Recreation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the City of Kirkland for renewing an independent ethics program for the City….CB 118702 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the City of Kirkland for renewing an independent ethics program for the City….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125060June 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission; authorizing the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the City of Kirkland for renewing an independent ethics program for the City of Kirkland; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 8805 Fremont Avenue North.CB 118700 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationBudget & AppropriationsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property commonly known as 8805 Fremont Avenue North.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125059June 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationBudget & AppropriationsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the 2008 Parks and Green Spaces Levy; authorizing the acquisition of real property commonly known as 8805 Fremont Avenue North; authorizing acceptance and recording of the deed for open space, park, and recreation purposes; increasing appropriations to the Department of Parks and Recreation in the 2016 Adopted Budget and the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program; revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $625,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Encouraging as a best practice the use of an individualized tenant assessment using the Fair Housing Act’s discriminatory effects standard to avoid….Res 31669 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originTenant Protections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Encouraging as a best practice the use of an individualized tenant assessment using the Fair Housing Act’s discriminatory effects standard to avoid….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION encouraging as a best practice the use of an individualized tenant assessment using the Fair Housing Act’s discriminatory effects standard to avoid Fair Housing Act violations when criminal history is used as a screening criterion in the landlord screening process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118703 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125061June 17, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118705 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125062June 17, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts easements granted to the City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of watermains, a hydrant, water facilities, a master meter….CB 118688 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts easements granted to the City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of watermains, a hydrant, water facilities, a master meter….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125063June 24, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting easements granted to the City of Seattle for installation, operation, and maintenance of watermains, a hydrant, water facilities, a master meter vault, and appurtenances necessary for water utility purposes at various locations in Seattle; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts easements granted to the City of Seattle for installation, operation and maintenance of storm drainage facilities, sewer facilities, sanitary sewer facilities….CB 118689 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts easements granted to the City of Seattle for installation, operation and maintenance of storm drainage facilities, sewer facilities, sanitary sewer facilities….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125064June 24, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting easements granted to the City of Seattle for installation, operation and maintenance of storm drainage facilities, sewer facilities, sanitary sewer facilities, a pedestrian walkway, retaining wall, combined sewer facilities, pedestrian and vehicular access, storm detention drain facilities, stormwater runoff, storm water drainage facilities, outfall discharge pipeline, storm sewer drain facility and appurtenances necessary for drainage and wastewater utility purposes at various locations in Seattle and unincorporated King County, Washington; placing the property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118710 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125069June 24, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to negotiate for and purchase parcels of land and acquire other real property rights….CB 118708 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to negotiate for and purchase parcels of land and acquire other real property rights….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125072July 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to negotiate for and purchase parcels of land and acquire other real property rights in accordance with the federal license for the City’s Boundary Hydroelectric Project; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to Seattle Police Department overtime usage and progress reports to the Gender Equity, Safe Communities, and New Americans Committee on implementation….Res 31675 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceGovernment Accountability Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to Seattle Police Department overtime usage and progress reports to the Gender Equity, Safe Communities, and New Americans Committee on implementation….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to Seattle Police Department overtime usage and progress reports to the Gender Equity, Safe Communities, and New Americans Committee on implementation of City Auditor recommendations from the April 2016 overtime audit.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates responsible police gun procurement.Res 31676 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPoliceProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates responsible police gun procurement.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
PoliceProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to responsible police gun procurement.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $90,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118711 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125071July 8, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriationsstructured-title fallback
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118714 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125073July 8, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118722 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125077July 15, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118729 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125078July 22, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure concerning health, labor, and safety standards for Seattle hotel employees.Res 31683 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure concerning health, labor, and safety standards for Seattle hotel employees.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 25, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure concerning health, labor, and safety standards for Seattle hotel employees; authorizing the City Clerk and the Executive Director of the Ethics and Elections Commission to take those actions necessary to enable the proposed Initiative to appear on the November 8, 2016 ballot and the local voters' pamphlet; requesting the King County Elections' Director to place the proposed Initiative on the November 8, 2016 election ballot; and providing for the publication of such proposed amendment.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a deed….CB 118721 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a deed….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125085July 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Next Generation Intelligent Transportation System; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a deed for street purposes for a portion of Block A, City Gardens, from Rainier TT LLC, a Washington limited liability company; laying off, opening, widening, extending, establishing, and designating the property for street purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such deed under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,108. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Superseding in part Ordinance 114502 relating to the sale of the Property.CB 118723 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Superseding in part Ordinance 114502 relating to the sale of the Property.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125086July 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Transportation jurisdictional property located in Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 13, Lake View Addition to the City of Seattle, commonly referred to as 805 NE Northlake Place (“Property”) and declaring it as surplus to the City’s needs; superseding in part Ordinance 114502 relating to the sale of the Property; authorizing the sale of the Property for fair market value through a negotiated sale to the University of Washington, and if such sale is not completed within one year of being offered for sale then through an open and competitive sales process to be managed by the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of Transportation, or his designee, to execute all necessary documents to accomplish the sale of the Property; and designating the proceeds from the sale.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $288,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a 2017-2022 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing a six-year rate path required to support the Strategic Plan.Res 31678 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a 2017-2022 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing a six-year rate path required to support the Strategic Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; adopting a 2017-2022 Strategic Plan for the City Light Department and endorsing a six-year rate path required to support the Strategic Plan.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118738 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125092July 29, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into a lease agreement with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources….CB 118720 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into a lease agreement with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125095August 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into a lease agreement with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for use of the Gold Mountain communications facility in Kitsap County, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $19,897. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the former University Substation property as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility service or….CB 118709 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the former University Substation property as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility service or….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125093August 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring the former University Substation property as surplus to the City’s needs and no longer required for providing public utility service or other municipal purpose; authorizing the sale of this property for appraised value to the University of Washington, or to be sold through a brokered sale managed by the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department or designee to execute all necessary documents to accomplish such property sale, and to deposit the proceeds of the sale in the City Light Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $621,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City Light Department.CB 118741 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125096August 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City Light Department; accepting certain easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts certain easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 118742 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts certain easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125097August 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting certain easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.CB 118743 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125098August 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to grant a permanent flowage easement to allow for a relocated portion of Cumberland Creek to occasionally flood conservation land owned by The City of Seattle in Skagit County, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the intention of the City Council to hold a public hearing relating to changing the assessment rates for the West Seattle….Res 31687 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the intention of the City Council to hold a public hearing relating to changing the assessment rates for the West Seattle….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring the intention of the City Council to hold a public hearing relating to changing the assessment rates for the West Seattle Junction Parking and Business Improvement Area.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into a five-party Reciprocal Easement Agreement with ELA, LLC.CB 118744 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into a five-party Reciprocal Easement Agreement with ELA, LLC.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125099August 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityWater & WastewaterProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department, declaring certain real property rights surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to enter into a five-party Reciprocal Easement Agreement with ELA, LLC; Echo Lake Senior Apartments; The Young Men’s Christian Association of Greater Seattle; and the Ronald Wastewater District; authorizing the conveyance and acceptance of easements; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
To initiate a Ballard Parking and Business Improvement Area.Res 31686 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

To initiate a Ballard Parking and Business Improvement Area.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION to initiate a Ballard Parking and Business Improvement Area

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Of intention to establish a Ballard Parking and Business Improvement Area and fix a date and place for a hearing thereon.Res 31685 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Of intention to establish a Ballard Parking and Business Improvement Area and fix a date and place for a hearing thereon.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION of intention to establish a Ballard Parking and Business Improvement Area and fix a date and place for a hearing thereon.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Acknowledging the 2016 Integrated Resource Plan for future energy efficiency and power resources needed to provide reliable, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible electric….Res 31684 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acknowledging the 2016 Integrated Resource Plan for future energy efficiency and power resources needed to provide reliable, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible electric….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 3, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; acknowledging the 2016 Integrated Resource Plan for future energy efficiency and power resources needed to provide reliable, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible electric power to the citizens of Seattle as conforming with the public policy objectives of The City of Seattle and the requirements of the State of Washington; and approving the plan for the biennium September 2016 through August 2018.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118749 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125101August 3, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes the shared city and community goals and strategies of the Equity and Environment Agenda as City policy and a critical aspect….Res 31681 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes the shared city and community goals and strategies of the Equity and Environment Agenda as City policy and a critical aspect….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing the shared city and community goals and strategies of the Equity and Environment Agenda as City policy and a critical aspect and foundation for all environment and sustainability work in Seattle.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Changing the name of Broad Street between 9th Avenue N and Westlake Avenue N to Roy Street, of Warren Place between Warren….CB 118732 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Changing the name of Broad Street between 9th Avenue N and Westlake Avenue N to Roy Street, of Warren Place between Warren….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125106August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City streets; changing the name of Broad Street between 9th Avenue N and Westlake Avenue N to Roy Street, of Warren Place between Warren Avenue N and its east terminus to Warren Place N, of S Della Street between 27th Avenue S and Martin Luther King Jr. Way S to S Walden Street, of Cloverdale Place S between Rainier Avenue S and Seward Avenue S to S Cloverdale Place, of NW 35th Street between 1st Avenue NW and NW Canal Street to NW Canal Street, of 1st Avenue NW between the south margin of N Canal Street and N 35th Street to N Canal Street, of a lower roadway at the east of the present existing bridge on Eastlake Avenue NE between its south terminus at the shoreline and the south margin of NE Pacific Street to Eastlake Place NE, of a lower roadway at the east of the present existing bridge on Eastlake Avenue NE between the north margin of NE Pacific Street and the south margin of NE 40th Street to Eastlake Place NE; correcting and confirming the name and location of NW 114th Street between NW Carkeek Park Road and NW 116th Street as NW 114th Street; naming the alley in Blocks 2, 3, and 4, Seaboard Addition to the City of Seattle, as 30th Avenue SW; naming the alley in Block 19, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle, as Yale Terrace E; and superseding Ordinance 102981 to the extent inconsistent.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $9,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of the “Lynnwood Link Supplement to the Memorandum of Agreement for Intergovernmental Cooperation (April 20, 1998) between Central Puget Sound….CB 118733 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTransitCollective Bargaining Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of the “Lynnwood Link Supplement to the Memorandum of Agreement for Intergovernmental Cooperation (April 20, 1998) between Central Puget Sound….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125107August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitCollective Bargaining
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (“Sound Transit”); authorizing execution of the “Lynnwood Link Supplement to the Memorandum of Agreement for Intergovernmental Cooperation (April 20, 1998) between Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) and the City of Seattle for the Central Link Light Rail Project”; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $611,064. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a Customer Review Panel to provide input to the 2018-2023 Strategic Business Plan Update.Res 31694 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a Customer Review Panel to provide input to the 2018-2023 Strategic Business Plan Update.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to Seattle Public Utilities; establishing a Customer Review Panel to provide input to the 2018-2023 Strategic Business Plan Update.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $40,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.CB 118745 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125112August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to grant funds from non-City sources; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept specified grants and execute related agreements for and on behalf of the City; and amending Ordinance 124927, which adopted the 2016 Budget, to increase appropriations to Seattle Public Utilities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $320,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2017.Res 31689 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2017.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS) Board of Administration for 2017.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118757 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125115August 17, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports City of Seattle Initiative Measure 124 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 124 on the November 8, 2016….Res 31695 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports City of Seattle Initiative Measure 124 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 124 on the November 8, 2016….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting City of Seattle Initiative Measure 124 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 124 on the November 8, 2016 general election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 1 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118758 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125116August 17, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118766 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125123September 9, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118767 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125124September 9, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Calling for a special election to fill a vacancy in the City employee-elected position on the Civil Service Commission and directing the….Res 31701 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Calling for a special election to fill a vacancy in the City employee-elected position on the Civil Service Commission and directing the….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 12, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace StandardsElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION calling for a special election to fill a vacancy in the City employee-elected position on the Civil Service Commission and directing the City Clerk to administer the election.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes new leases of the removed parcels to YouthCare and Friends of Youth and deeds from the City to convey the buildings….CB 118787 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originYouth & EducationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes new leases of the removed parcels to YouthCare and Friends of Youth and deeds from the City to convey the buildings….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125129September 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to property at Sand Point, authorizing the Housing Director to execute an amendment to and partial termination of the lease of City of Seattle land authorized by Ordinance 122459, as amended pursuant to Ordinance 123195, to remove three parcels from that lease; authorizing new leases of the removed parcels to YouthCare and Friends of Youth and deeds from the City to convey the buildings on those parcels to the lessees for the duration of the new leases; and authorizing related documents and actions.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Supports Washington Initiative Measure 1491 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1491 on the November 8, 2016 general election….Res 31702 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports Washington Initiative Measure 1491 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1491 on the November 8, 2016 general election….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Washington Initiative Measure 1491 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1491 on the November 8, 2016 general election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports Washington Initiative Measure 1433 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1433 on the November 8, 2016 general election….Res 31703 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports Washington Initiative Measure 1433 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1433 on the November 8, 2016 general election….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Washington Initiative Measure 1433 and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 1433 on the November 8, 2016 general election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports Sound Transit (A Regional Transit Authority) Proposition 1 ballot measure and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Sound Transit Proposition….Res 31704 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransitElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports Sound Transit (A Regional Transit Authority) Proposition 1 ballot measure and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Sound Transit Proposition….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
TransitElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Sound Transit (A Regional Transit Authority) Proposition 1 ballot measure and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Sound Transit Proposition 1 on the November 8, 2016 general election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118795 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125131September 16, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Improvement….Res 31707 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Improvement….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 16, 2016
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2016C, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124916 and in Ordinance 124335 (as amended by Ordinance 124916); confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Light System of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken and to be taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….Res 31708 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyOrigin unclearElectricityTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 16, 2016
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & DebtProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue Bonds, Series 2016D (Multi-Modal) and Series 2016E (Multi-Modal), for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124916; authorizing the Director of Finance to execute a Continuing Covenant Agreement with the initial purchaser of such Bonds to negotiate and execute related documents and agreements from time to time in connection with the election of variable interest rate modes; and confirming, ratifying and approving action taken and to be taken by the Director of Finance of the City of Seattle and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds to the initial purchaser thereof and in connection with the election of variable interest rate modes with respect thereto throughout the term of such bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Proclaiming the City of Seattle’s Support for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Opposition to the Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.Res 31709 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Proclaiming the City of Seattle’s Support for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Opposition to the Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez, Bruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION proclaiming the City of Seattle’s Support for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s Opposition to the Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Voicing support for certain community-initiated projects contained in the Plan and identifying next steps for implementation of those projects.Res 31711 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Voicing support for certain community-initiated projects contained in the Plan and identifying next steps for implementation of those projects.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 26, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Equitable Development Implementation Plan and Equitable Development Financial Investment Strategy; voicing support for certain community-initiated projects contained in the Plan and identifying next steps for implementation of those projects.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conceptual approval to Swedish Health Services to construct and maintain a pedestrian tunnel under and across Minor Avenue, south of Columbia….Res 31700 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval to Swedish Health Services to construct and maintain a pedestrian tunnel under and across Minor Avenue, south of Columbia….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to Swedish Health Services to construct and maintain a pedestrian tunnel under and across Minor Avenue, south of Columbia Street and north of Cherry Street.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept on behalf of The City of Seattle the transfer of approximately 155 acres….CB 118773 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & Habitat Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept on behalf of The City of Seattle the transfer of approximately 155 acres….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125139September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept on behalf of The City of Seattle the transfer of approximately 155 acres of forest land in the North Fork Tolt River Watershed from Forterra and to acquire approximately 100 acres of forest land located adjacent to the Forterra property and the South Fork Tolt Municipal Watershed owned by the City.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $175,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of a donation of real property in Seattle from the Madison Valley Park Foundation for open space, park, and….CB 118797 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of a donation of real property in Seattle from the Madison Valley Park Foundation for open space, park, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125143September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acceptance of a donation of real property in Seattle from the Madison Valley Park Foundation for open space, park, and recreation purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $27,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to addressing the needs of people living in the I-5 East Duwamish Greenbelt and in the adjoining neighborhoods.Res 31705 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originHuman Services & Food SecurityNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to addressing the needs of people living in the I-5 East Duwamish Greenbelt and in the adjoining neighborhoods.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Human Services & Food SecurityNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to addressing the needs of people living in the I-5 East Duwamish Greenbelt and in the adjoining neighborhoods; accepting the Seattle Human Services Department’s East Duwamish Greenbelt Encampments Outreach Assessment; and approving the City’s operations plan to physically improve and maintain the Greenbelt and provide a healthier and safer environment for all.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $150,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 3 opposed
Recognizing the extensive effort of the Rainier Beach neighborhood to update its vision and plan for the future of the neighborhood.Res 31710 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Recognizing the extensive effort of the Rainier Beach neighborhood to update its vision and plan for the future of the neighborhood.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Rob Johnson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the extensive effort of the Rainier Beach neighborhood to update its vision and plan for the future of the neighborhood; to advance neighborhood priorities through the completion of the “Rainier Beach Neighborhood Plan Update,” a combined effort of the community and the City, that informs City policies, programs, and investments for those areas included in the Rainier Beach Neighborhood Plan Update.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adjusts the pay zones for certain job titles in the City’s Information Technology Professional discretionary pay program.CB 118808 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adjusts the pay zones for certain job titles in the City’s Information Technology Professional discretionary pay program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125145September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; adjusting the pay zones for certain job titles in the City’s Information Technology Professional discretionary pay program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118803 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125137September 29, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118816 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125150September 29, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Modifies the assessment rates.CB 118748 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Modifies the assessment rates.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125152October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the West Seattle Junction Parking and Business Improvement Area; modifying the assessment rates; and amending Ordinance 113326, as previously amended by Ordinances 119539, 120570, and 121758, in accordance therewith.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $30,251. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a new Ballard Parking and Business Improvement Area.CB 118747 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a new Ballard Parking and Business Improvement Area.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125151October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
NeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing a new Ballard Parking and Business Improvement Area; levying special assessments upon owners of business property, multi-family residential property, and mixed-use property within the area; providing for the deposit of revenues in a special account and expenditures therefrom; providing for collection of and penalties for delinquencies; providing for the establishment of a Ratepayers Advisory Board; and providing for an implementation agreement with a Program Manager.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $399,102. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.CB 118812 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125167October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, commonly referred to as the Third Quarter 2016 Employment Ordinance; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; returning a position to Civil Service status; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing the need to accelerate the transition of the City’s transportation sector away from oil and increase the use of electricity for….Res 31696 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing the need to accelerate the transition of the City’s transportation sector away from oil and increase the use of electricity for….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the need to accelerate the transition of the City’s transportation sector away from oil and increase the use of electricity for transportation by adopting a goal to cut oil use for transportation by half by 2035; endorsing the Mayor’s Drive Clean Seattle initiative; setting a goal that 30 percent of vehicles in the City will be electric by 2030; and establishing requirements for the Executive to report on initial actions to support these goals.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, on behalf of the City, to negotiate and execute real property lease agreements and….CB 118814 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, on behalf of the City, to negotiate and execute real property lease agreements and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125168October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, on behalf of the City, to negotiate and execute real property lease agreements and amendments to existing lease agreements with the U.S. General Services Administration, for warehouse space in the Federal Center South Complex located at 4735 East Marginal Way South; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $168,573. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates a compensation program for the position of Seattle Public Utilities General Manager/Chief Executive Officer.CB 118804 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates a compensation program for the position of Seattle Public Utilities General Manager/Chief Executive Officer.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125164October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment; creating a compensation program for the position of Seattle Public Utilities General Manager/Chief Executive Officer; specifying provisions for the administration of said compensation program; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the Seattle Freight Master Plan.Res 31706 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the Seattle Freight Master Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the Seattle Freight Master Plan.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer facility easements within property bound by 25th Avenue NE, NE 49th Street, 30th Avenue….CB 118806 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights relating to sewer facility easements within property bound by 25th Avenue NE, NE 49th Street, 30th Avenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125166October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights relating to sewer facility easements within property bound by 25th Avenue NE, NE 49th Street, 30th Avenue NE, and NE 45th Street in Seattle as being surplus to the City’s utility needs; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to relinquish such easement rights and to accept a new easement from University Village Limited Partnership for a City-owned sanitary sewer facility; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118818 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125170October 7, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118819 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125172October 17, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
To enter a partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to participate in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Urban Conservation….Res 31713 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & Habitat Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

To enter a partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to participate in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Urban Conservation….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION to enter a partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to participate in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Urban Conservation Treaty for Migratory Birds Program encouraging the exploration and incorporation of bird-friendly policies, design, and best practices for creating, enhancing, and maintaining safe habitats for migratory birds and other urban wildlife.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports Washington Initiative Measure 735, and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 735 on the November 8, 2016, general election….Res 31715 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports Washington Initiative Measure 735, and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 735 on the November 8, 2016, general election….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Washington Initiative Measure 735, and urging Seattle voters to vote “Yes” on Initiative 735 on the November 8, 2016, general election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118820 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125174October 28, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118821 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125175October 28, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118822 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125177November 4, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Approves the City of Seattle Disaster Recovery Framework.Res 31721 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originEmergency Management Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the City of Seattle Disaster Recovery Framework.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Emergency Management
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving the City of Seattle Disaster Recovery Framework.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates City employment, to increase the sick leave cash out payment upon retirement for persons in the rank and position of Assistant….CB 118824 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates City employment, to increase the sick leave cash out payment upon retirement for persons in the rank and position of Assistant….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125179November 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment, to increase the sick leave cash out payment upon retirement for persons in the rank and position of Assistant Fire Chief.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118852 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125180November 16, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118858 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125182November 16, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2017.CB 118849 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2017.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125207November 22, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2017; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Adopts revised financial policies for the Emergency Subfund.Res 31717 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts revised financial policies for the Emergency Subfund.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting revised financial policies for the Emergency Subfund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 124345 to extend the duration of the interfund loan to be used for this capital program and establishing the Transportation….CB 118830 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 124345 to extend the duration of the interfund loan to be used for this capital program and establishing the Transportation….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125188November 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the financing of the Central Waterfront Improvement Program; amending Ordinance 124345 to extend the duration of the interfund loan to be used for this capital program and establishing the Transportation Master Fund as the lending fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a capital project oversight work program for the Budget Committee for 2017.Res 31720 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originBudget & AppropriationsGovernment Accountability Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a capital project oversight work program for the Budget Committee for 2017.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 28, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & AppropriationsGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a capital project oversight work program for the Budget Committee for 2017.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118867 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125213November 28, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates funding policies for the Homelessness Prevention and Housing Stability Services Program funded through the Seattle Housing Levy.CB 118863 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingHomelessness Services Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates funding policies for the Homelessness Prevention and Housing Stability Services Program funded through the Seattle Housing Levy.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125217December 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingHomelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to funding policies for the Homelessness Prevention and Housing Stability Services Program funded through the Seattle Housing Levy.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the 2016 Housing Levy Oversight Committee, setting the terms of office of the members of the Oversight Committee and authorizing it….Res 31722 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingGovernment Accountability Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the 2016 Housing Levy Oversight Committee, setting the terms of office of the members of the Oversight Committee and authorizing it….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the 2016 Housing Levy Oversight Committee, setting the terms of office of the members of the Oversight Committee and authorizing it to consider issues regarding programs funded by earlier housing levies.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2017 State Legislative Agenda.Res 31723 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2017 State Legislative Agenda.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2017 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118868 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125218December 8, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating the remaining north 40 feet of the alley in Block 18, being the remaining portion of the alley in the block….CB 118789 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating the remaining north 40 feet of the alley in Block 18, being the remaining portion of the alley in the block….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125219December 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the remaining north 40 feet of the alley in Block 18, being the remaining portion of the alley in the block lying between East Cherry Street on the north and East Jefferson Street on the south, the alley being located approximately 140 feet west of 12th Avenue, on the petition of Seattle University (Clerk File 305367).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $121,600. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118877 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125224December 16, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property in Section 16, Township 27 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in Snohomish County, Washington, surplus to utility needs.CB 118799 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property in Section 16, Township 27 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in Snohomish County, Washington, surplus to utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125234December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property in Section 16, Township 27 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in Snohomish County, Washington, surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement between The City of Seattle and Lennar Northwest, Inc. (“Lennar”) for the conveyance of said property to Snohomish County; accepting payment for the true and full value of said property from Lennar; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $163,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City Light Department.CB 118800 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125236December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City Light Department; authorizing and directing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the Kalispel Tribe of Indians.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Declares as surplus and authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department to partially release three easements….CB 118879 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares as surplus and authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department to partially release three easements….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125235December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring as surplus and authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of the City Light Department to partially release three easements for electrical service in King County, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Approves and confirming the plat of “Fremont on the Ave” in portions of the Northeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 18….CB 118876 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves and confirming the plat of “Fremont on the Ave” in portions of the Northeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 18….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125229December 21, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE approving and confirming the plat of “Fremont on the Ave” in portions of the Northeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, Washington.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the Duwamish Waterway Cleanup and the health of communities adjacent to the Lower Duwamish Waterway.Res 31567 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the Duwamish Waterway Cleanup and the health of communities adjacent to the Lower Duwamish Waterway.

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 20, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the Duwamish Waterway Cleanup and the health of communities adjacent to the Lower Duwamish Waterway.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent (SLIs) for the 2015 Adopted Budget, the 2016 Endorsed Budget and 2015-2020 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).Res 31566 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts Statements of Legislative Intent (SLIs) for the 2015 Adopted Budget, the 2016 Endorsed Budget and 2015-2020 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 20, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting Statements of Legislative Intent (SLIs) for the 2015 Adopted Budget, the 2016 Endorsed Budget and 2015-2020 Adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118326 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124714February 20, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118331 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124715February 27, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Proposing that certain public-interest obligations be required of Comcast Corporation for its proposed merger with Time Warner Cable Incorporated in the event….Res 31569 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Proposing that certain public-interest obligations be required of Comcast Corporation for its proposed merger with Time Warner Cable Incorporated in the event….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 27, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Nick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION proposing that certain public-interest obligations be required of Comcast Corporation for its proposed merger with Time Warner Cable Incorporated in the event the merger is approved by the Federal Communications Commission.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118337 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124722February 27, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts the City of Seattle Privacy Principles governing the City’s operations, which will provide an ethical framework for dealing with current and….Res 31570 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts the City of Seattle Privacy Principles governing the City’s operations, which will provide an ethical framework for dealing with current and….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Mike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the City of Seattle Privacy Principles governing the City’s operations, which will provide an ethical framework for dealing with current and future technologies that impact privacy, and setting timelines for future reporting on the development of a Privacy Statement and Privacy Toolkit for their implementation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of the City of Seattle, various easements….CB 118336 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of the City of Seattle, various easements….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124729March 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the First Hill Streetcar project; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of the City of Seattle, various easements granted to the City of Seattle for a portion of Blocks 5, 6, 11, 12, and 14 of the Town of Seattle, as laid out by D. S. Maynard, Commonly known as D. S. Maynard’s Plat of Seattle, and Blocks 138 and 139 of A. A. Denny’s Broadway Addition to the City of Seattle, to install, construct, erect, alter, improve, repair, and maintain permanent streetcar cable eyebolts to various buildings or structures; placing such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $350,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating a portion of Terry Avenue and an alley in Block 32, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition, on the petition….CB 118333 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating a portion of Terry Avenue and an alley in Block 32, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition, on the petition….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124728March 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating a portion of Terry Avenue and an alley in Block 32, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition, on the petition of King County (Clerk File 295303); and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $150,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118338 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124725March 6, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a 5-year budget review process and approving the proposed budget framework of the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission for its fiscal years….Res 31568 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a 5-year budget review process and approving the proposed budget framework of the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission for its fiscal years….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 19, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION establishing a 5-year budget review process and approving the proposed budget framework of the Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission for its fiscal years 2015 through 2018.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $130,597. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating a portion of Delridge Way Southwest and other portions of Government Lot 3, in Section 13, Township 24 North, Range 3….CB 118345 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating a portion of Delridge Way Southwest and other portions of Government Lot 3, in Section 13, Township 24 North, Range 3….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124734March 19, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating a portion of Delridge Way Southwest and other portions of Government Lot 3, in Section 13, Township 24 North, Range 3 East, W.M., on the petition of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services (Clerk File 311504); and placing it under jurisdiction of the Department of Finance and Administrative Services.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118344 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124730March 19, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118348 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124732March 19, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118353 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124735March 27, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing the Seattle City Council's opposition to the current form of Trade Promotion Authority (“Fast Track”), strong concerns about draft elements of….Res 31573 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksOrigin unclearElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Expressing the Seattle City Council's opposition to the current form of Trade Promotion Authority (“Fast Track”), strong concerns about draft elements of….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 30, 2015
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien, Kshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the Seattle City Council's opposition to the current form of Trade Promotion Authority (“Fast Track”), strong concerns about draft elements of the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), and support of fair trade practices and agreements that protect American jobs, protect workers, protect the environment, improve the quality of life in all signatory countries, maintain the integrity and sovereignty of our judicial system, and not give multinational corporations power to undermine national and local governmental authority to create reasonable rules and regulations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 123256 to clarify the role of and support for the City Light Review Panel.CB 118330 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 123256 to clarify the role of and support for the City Light Review Panel.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124740April 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Ordinance 123256 to clarify the role of and support for the City Light Review Panel.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 118351 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124743April 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.CB 118352 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124744April 6, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; accepting various easements for overhead and underground electrical rights in King County, Washington; placing said easements under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118358 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124739April 6, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Retiring introduced and referred Council Bills, Resolutions, and Clerk Files which have received no further action.Res 31574 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Retiring introduced and referred Council Bills, Resolutions, and Clerk Files which have received no further action.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 10, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION retiring introduced and referred Council Bills, Resolutions, and Clerk Files which have received no further action.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports the establishment of a dignified and robust wage for employees performing work in cities across America, as part of a national….Res 31575 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports the establishment of a dignified and robust wage for employees performing work in cities across America, as part of a national….

OutcomeAdoptedApril 10, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting the establishment of a dignified and robust wage for employees performing work in cities across America, as part of a national mobilization on April 15th to promote higher wages for all working families.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $15. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118364 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124748April 10, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118371 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124751April 17, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118372 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124755April 24, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes a new University District Parking and Business Improvement Area.CB 118302 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-originNeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes a new University District Parking and Business Improvement Area.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124761May 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
NeighborhoodsProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE establishing a new University District Parking and Business Improvement Area; levying special assessments upon owners of business property, multi-family residential property, and mixed-use property within the area; providing for the deposit of revenues in a special account and expenditures therefrom; providing for collection of and penalties for delinquencies; providing for the establishment of a Ratepayers Advisory Board; providing for an implementation agreement with a Program Manager; disestablishing the current University District Parking and Business Improvement Area that was established in 1996 by Ordinance 118412 (“1996 UDBIA”); suspending the issuance of assessments and providing for the winding up of activities under the 1996 UDBIA; and providing for the distribution of remaining funds from and closing of the 1996 UDBIA account.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $743,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 2 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118382 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124760May 1, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolutions 31497, 31498 and 31499.Res 31579 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolutions 31497, 31498 and 31499.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolutions 31497, 31498 and 31499; updating the monthly President Pro Tem schedule, committee membership of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for 2015, and Councilmember participation on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement….Res 31580 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 6, 2015
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement and Refunding Bonds, 2015A and Limited Tax General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2015B (Taxable) for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124637 and in Ordinance 121651 (as amended by Ordinance 122286 and amended and restated by Ordinance 124343); confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding general obligation bonds of the City; confirming, ratifying and approving the notice of bond sale and other actions taken in connection with the issuance of the bonds and their sale to the purchaser; and ratifying and confirming the actions of the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Provides for the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2015.Res 31581 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureOrigin unclearBridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Provides for the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2015.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 6, 2015
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & StructuresPermitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2015; specifying the amounts, maturities, interest rates and other terms of the bonds; providing for the payment of all or part of the costs related to the design, construction, renovation, improvement and replacement of the seawall and associated public infrastructure, and the payment of the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; and ratifying, confirming and approving the notice of bond sale and the actions of the Director of Finance relating to the sale of the bonds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the sale of said property.CB 118373 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the sale of said property.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124764May 8, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, declaring the vacant property located at 8030 Fauntleroy Way SW as surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of said property; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute all documents for the sale and transfer of the property to Gary Moore; and directing how proceeds from the sale shall be distributed.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,456. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118389 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124763May 8, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute an agreement with The Vera Project for presentation of an all-ages music and art program….CB 118386 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & CultureProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute an agreement with The Vera Project for presentation of an all-ages music and art program….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124769May 15, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute an agreement with The Vera Project for presentation of an all-ages music and art program during 2015 and 2016; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $75,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming that the City of Seattle’s core value of race and social equity is one of the foundations on which the Comprehensive….Res 31577 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Confirming that the City of Seattle’s core value of race and social equity is one of the foundations on which the Comprehensive….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 15, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION confirming that the City of Seattle’s core value of race and social equity is one of the foundations on which the Comprehensive Plan is built.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the use of the Port of Seattle’s Terminal 5 for Arctic drilling operations.Res 31576 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the use of the Port of Seattle’s Terminal 5 for Arctic drilling operations.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 15, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the use of the Port of Seattle’s Terminal 5 for Arctic drilling operations.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118390 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124767May 15, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Water System Improvement and Refunding….Res 31586 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearWater & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Water System Improvement and Refunding….

OutcomeAdoptedMay 20, 2015
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Water System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2015, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124340 and in Ordinance 121939 (as amended by Ordinance 122837 and amended and restated by Ordinance 124339); confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken to provide for the refunding of certain outstanding bonds of the Water System of the City; and confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken by the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds to the purchaser thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts a quit claim deed from King County for real property located in unincorporated King County in the Northwest Quarter of Section….CB 118639 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts a quit claim deed from King County for real property located in unincorporated King County in the Northwest Quarter of Section….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124779May 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting a quit claim deed from King County for real property located in unincorporated King County in the Northwest Quarter of Section 07, Township 26 North, Range 05 East; placing the real property conveyed by said quit claim deed under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Regarding certification of The City of Seattle as a Bee City.Res 31582 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Regarding certification of The City of Seattle as a Bee City.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding certification of The City of Seattle as a Bee City.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118394 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124772May 22, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes new titles and salaries.CB 118398 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originCollective BargainingWorkplace StandardsHuman Services & Food Security Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes new titles and salaries.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124783May 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Collective BargainingWorkplace StandardsHuman Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment commonly referred to as the First Quarter 2015 Employment Ordinance; establishing new titles and salaries; establishing a premium pay for certain licensing requirements at Seattle Center; amending Ordinance 124648; increasing funds for the Human Services Operating Fund; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; authorizing the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement between The City of Seattle and Public Service and Industrial Employees Local 1239 and a Memorandum of Agreement between The City of Seattle and International Union of Operating Engineers Local 286; and ratifying and confirming prior acts; all by a three-fourths vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $294,257. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone: Executive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118400 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124781May 29, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, 2015….Res 31589 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearSolid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, 2015….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 3, 2015
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, 2015, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124629; and confirming, ratifying and approving actions taken and to be taken by the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds to the purchaser thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118409 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124785June 4, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118413 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124787June 22, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….Res 31592 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 23, 2015
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue Bonds, 2015A, for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124633; and confirming, ratifying and approving action taken and to be taken by the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds to the purchaser thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….Res 31593 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyOrigin unclearElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

Confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 23, 2015
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to contracting indebtedness; confirming, ratifying and approving certain terms of the issuance and sale of The City of Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light and Power Revenue Bonds, 2015B (SIFMA Index), for the purposes set forth in Ordinance 124633; and confirming, ratifying and approving action taken and to be taken by the Director of Finance and other City officials relating to the issuance and sale of the bonds to the underwriter thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources on behalf of….CB 118414 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources on behalf of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124793June 26, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute and accept from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources on behalf of the City of Seattle a Waterway Permit for Waterway 3 and a Waterway Permit for a portion of Waterway 4, both in Lake Union Park.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes execution of an agreement with Festivals, Inc. for the presentation of the annual Bite of Seattle® Festival at Seattle Center in….CB 118408 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes execution of an agreement with Festivals, Inc. for the presentation of the annual Bite of Seattle® Festival at Seattle Center in….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124794June 26, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Center Department; authorizing execution of an agreement with Festivals, Inc. for the presentation of the annual Bite of Seattle® Festival at Seattle Center in 2015, 2016, and 2017; and ratifying and confirming prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $231,782. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the Vietnamese Heritage and Freedom flag as the symbol for Seattle’s Vietnamese community.Res 31591 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Recognizing the Vietnamese Heritage and Freedom flag as the symbol for Seattle’s Vietnamese community.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 26, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the Vietnamese Heritage and Freedom flag as the symbol for Seattle’s Vietnamese community.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118415 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124790June 26, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118418 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124792June 26, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept the grant of a non-exclusive easement within the West Waterway of the Duwamish….CB 118395 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept the grant of a non-exclusive easement within the West Waterway of the Duwamish….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124799July 7, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to accept the grant of a non-exclusive easement within the West Waterway of the Duwamish River from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for a City-owned sanitary sewer line.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants authority to accept and execute revenue and funding source agreements to support the operation and services of the Lighting Design Lab.CB 118399 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants authority to accept and execute revenue and funding source agreements to support the operation and services of the Lighting Design Lab.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124798July 7, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; granting authority to accept and execute revenue and funding source agreements to support the operation and services of the Lighting Design Lab; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118427 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124795July 7, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118431 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124802July 10, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports Executive Order 2015-02: Workforce Equity Initiative, which addresses gender and race/ethnic wage equity for City employees.Res 31588 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCompensation & Benefits Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports Executive Order 2015-02: Workforce Equity Initiative, which addresses gender and race/ethnic wage equity for City employees.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCompensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting Executive Order 2015-02: Workforce Equity Initiative, which addresses gender and race/ethnic wage equity for City employees; and requesting the development of metrics and reporting processes to track the achievement of objectives listed in the Executive Order.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a 15-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system in, across, over, along, under….CB 118425 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves a 15-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system in, across, over, along, under….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124806July 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; approving a 15-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system in, across, over, along, under, through, and below certain designated public rights-of-way in the City of Lake Forest Park.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118435 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124804July 17, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights and improvements surplus to the City of Seattle’s utility needs.CB 118424 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights and improvements surplus to the City of Seattle’s utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124816July 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights and improvements surplus to the City of Seattle’s utility needs; and authorizing the release of an access easement and a permit for a groundwater observation well, and the conveyance of ownership of said groundwater well to James and Valerie Van Dyke in Pend Oreille County, Washington.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of the City of Seattle, a deed….CB 118430 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of the City of Seattle, a deed….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124813July 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Pedestrian Master Plan Implementation project; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of the City of Seattle, a deed for street purposes for a portion of Lot 1, Block 5, Seattle Suburban Home Tracts, from DVM Investments LLC, a Washington limited liability company; authorizing the Director of the Department of Transportation to acquire, accept, and record on behalf of the City of Seattle, a deed for street purposes for a portion of Lots 1, Block 6, Seattle Suburban Home Tracts, from Windsor Park Estates Lake City, LLC, a Washington limited liability company; placing the real property conveyed by such deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation and designating the property for street purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of the Maintenance Obligations and Ownership Agreement for Boundary Substation with the Bonneville Power Administration.CB 118441 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of the Maintenance Obligations and Ownership Agreement for Boundary Substation with the Bonneville Power Administration.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124817July 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the execution of the Maintenance Obligations and Ownership Agreement for Boundary Substation with the Bonneville Power Administration; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City Light Department, approving a 15-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system….CB 118445 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricity Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City Light Department, approving a 15-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124820July 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department, approving a 15-year franchise to construct, operate, maintain, replace, and repair an electrical light and power system in, across, over, along, under, through, and below certain designated public rights-of-way in the City of SeaTac.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City Light Department.CB 118444 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124819July 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light to execute a Reliability Coordinator Funding Agreement with Peak Reliability, Inc.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the transport of crude oil by rail through the City of Seattle.Res 31604 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the transport of crude oil by rail through the City of Seattle.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the transport of crude oil by rail through the City of Seattle.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118442 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124811July 29, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118454 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124814July 29, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs.CB 118449 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124824August 7, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs; granting a non-exclusive easement to Puget Sound Energy, for electrical power distribution purposes, a portion of the City’s Tolt Pipeline right of way, located in the South One-half of Section 17 and the Northeast Quarter of Section 20, Township 26 North, Range 6 East, W.M., King County, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $248,639. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an interagency agreement with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for provision….CB 118450 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an interagency agreement with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for provision….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124825August 7, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to execute an interagency agreement with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for provision of long-term monitoring and evaluation activities for the Cedar River Hatchery Program; and ratifying and confirming prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $625,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118458 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124822August 7, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Seattle, Washington, and the North Highline Fire District that outlines….CB 118462 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Seattle, Washington, and the North Highline Fire District that outlines….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124826August 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Seattle, Washington, and the North Highline Fire District that outlines the terms and conditions of payments to the North Highline Fire District to mitigate the financial impacts associated with the City of Seattle’s annexation of the Duwamish Annexation Area.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $170,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute a second amendment to the ground lease.CB 118459 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Seattle Center Director to execute a second amendment to the ground lease.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124832August 14, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the ground lease between The City of Seattle and Experience Music Project authorized under Ordinance 118336; authorizing the Seattle Center Director to execute a second amendment to the ground lease.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118475 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124827August 14, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure establishing a public development authority (PDA) to build and operate a mile-long elevated park and other amenities….Res 31607 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure establishing a public development authority (PDA) to build and operate a mile-long elevated park and other amenities….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION regarding a voter-proposed Initiative Measure establishing a public development authority (PDA) to build and operate a mile-long elevated park and other amenities along Seattle’s waterfront, integrating one block of the existing Alaskan Way Viaduct into the design of the elevated park; authorizing the City Clerk and the Executive Director of the Ethics and Elections Commission to take those actions necessary to enable the proposed Initiative to appear on the August 2, 2016 ballot and the local voters' pamphlet; requesting the King County Elections' Director to place the proposed initiative on the August 2, 2016 election ballot; and providing for the publication of such initiative.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the Property at 339 22nd Avenue East (PMA 156) as surplus to the City’s needs.CB 118412 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the Property at 339 22nd Avenue East (PMA 156) as surplus to the City’s needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124839August 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE declaring the Property at 339 22nd Avenue East (PMA 156) as surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to sell two parcels through an open and competitive process; and designating the disposition of sales proceeds.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $775,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the sale of said property.CB 118472 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the sale of said property.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124840August 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, declaring the vacant property located at 5622 40th Avenue West as surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of said property; authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute all documents for the sale and transfer of the property; and directing how proceeds from the sale shall be distributed.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $26,250. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute an amendment extending certain lease agreements between The City of Seattle and….CB 118473 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute an amendment extending certain lease agreements between The City of Seattle and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124841August 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services to execute an amendment extending certain lease agreements between The City of Seattle and KBS SOR CENTRAL BUILDING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for office space the City leases at 810 Third Avenue; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $30. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118480 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124835August 21, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts revised rules for City Council quasi-judicial proceedings, and repealing the previous rules that were adopted by Resolution 31375.Res 31602 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts revised rules for City Council quasi-judicial proceedings, and repealing the previous rules that were adopted by Resolution 31375.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 8, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting revised rules for City Council quasi-judicial proceedings, and repealing the previous rules that were adopted by Resolution 31375.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute, for and on behalf of the City, a concession agreement granting Fifth Avenue….CB 118487 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute, for and on behalf of the City, a concession agreement granting Fifth Avenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124847September 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to execute, for and on behalf of the City, a concession agreement granting Fifth Avenue Sports, LLC d/b/a Green Lake Boathouse the right to operate a concession providing boat rental service, and retail and food sales at the Department’s facility at Green Lake Park.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $69,677. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes applications for grant funding assistance to the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office for Youth Athletics Facilities projects as provided in….Res 31610 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes applications for grant funding assistance to the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office for Youth Athletics Facilities projects as provided in….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing applications for grant funding assistance to the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office for Youth Athletics Facilities projects as provided in WAC 286 and subsequent legislative action.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $250,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes ecological forest thinning projects in accordance with the South Fork Tolt River Watershed Management Plan in Sections 25, 26, 27, 29….CB 118485 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originTrees & Habitat Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes ecological forest thinning projects in accordance with the South Fork Tolt River Watershed Management Plan in Sections 25, 26, 27, 29….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124854September 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the management of the South Fork Tolt River Municipal Watershed; authorizing ecological forest thinning projects in accordance with the South Fork Tolt River Watershed Management Plan in Sections 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, and 35, Township 26 North, Range 9 East, W.M.; declaring the logs resulting from said projects to be surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the sale of such logs pursuant to applicable City contracting and surplus property sale procedures; and directing use of the proceeds therefrom to fund Plan implementation.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $82,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights relating to a sewer facility easement within a portion of property located at 14027 Lake City Way….CB 118486 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights relating to a sewer facility easement within a portion of property located at 14027 Lake City Way….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124855September 11, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights relating to a sewer facility easement within a portion of property located at 14027 Lake City Way NE as being surplus to the City’s utility needs; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to relinquish such easement rights and accept a new easement granted from 14027 Lake City Investors, LLC for a City-owned sanitary sewer facility; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118495 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124844September 11, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118496 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124845September 11, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118497 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124846September 11, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of the grant of an easement for public access over and across a portion of the property commonly known….CB 118491 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of the grant of an easement for public access over and across a portion of the property commonly known….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124858September 18, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing the acceptance of the grant of an easement for public access over and across a portion of the property commonly known as (old) Fire Station Seven, located at 402 15th Avenue East, in exchange for the City’s extinguishment of certain deed restrictions encumbering title to Fire Station Seven; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118501 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124856September 24, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses a vision for The City of Seattle to become a city with zero use of detention for youth, and establishing a….Res 31614 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originYouth & Education Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Endorses a vision for The City of Seattle to become a city with zero use of detention for youth, and establishing a….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing a vision for The City of Seattle to become a city with zero use of detention for youth, and establishing a path forward to develop policies that eliminate the need for youth detention.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $95,805. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports efforts by the State Legislature to allow local governments to propose ordinances that significantly increase the supply of rent restricted units….Res 31620 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports efforts by the State Legislature to allow local governments to propose ordinances that significantly increase the supply of rent restricted units….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 21, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting efforts by the State Legislature to allow local governments to propose ordinances that significantly increase the supply of rent restricted units and that protect tenants from sudden and dramatic rent increases, without causing a negative impact on the quality or quantity of housing supply, by modifying or repealing RCW 35.21.830.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Declares the City Council's intent to consider strategies to increase the availability of affordable housing in The City of Seattle.Res 31609 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the City Council's intent to consider strategies to increase the availability of affordable housing in The City of Seattle.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 28, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring the City Council's intent to consider strategies to increase the availability of affordable housing in The City of Seattle; and requesting the State Legislature to adopt new policies or modify existing policies in order to provide additional opportunities for cities and counties to increase the availability of affordable housing.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 121572.CB 118482 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 121572.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124874September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to an open space improvements over and across Utah Avenue South between South Stacy Street and South Lander Street; amending Ordinance 121572; updating the insurance and bond requirements; amending the annual fee and other terms and conditions of the permit; renewing the term of the permit to First & Utah Street Associates, LLC; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $44,184. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the execution of an Agreement for Activation and Programming of Westlake Park and Occidental Square Park.CB 118478 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the execution of an Agreement for Activation and Programming of Westlake Park and Occidental Square Park.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124865September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the execution of an Agreement for Activation and Programming of Westlake Park and Occidental Square Park; and ratifying and confirming prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $60,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes AlertSeattle as the City’s emergency notification and alerting system.CB 118507 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originGovernment Accountability Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes AlertSeattle as the City’s emergency notification and alerting system.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124870September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Government Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to The City of Seattle’s (City) emergency notification and alerting system; establishing AlertSeattle as the City’s emergency notification and alerting system; adopting policies governing the use thereof including administrative guidelines and a governance charter; and repealing Ordinance Number 122527.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to acquire, through negotiation or condemnation, land and other necessary property rights commonly known as….CB 118500 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to acquire, through negotiation or condemnation, land and other necessary property rights commonly known as….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124864September 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to acquire, through negotiation or condemnation, land and other necessary property rights commonly known as portions of 12754 and13002 NE Riviera Place for open space, park, and recreation purposes, and to execute, accept, and record deeds and convenient documents and agreements deemed by the Superintendent to be necessary to this transaction on behalf of the City; placing conveyed real property under the jurisdiction of the Department of Parks and Recreation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118511 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124859September 29, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses the City Light Department’s Wholesale Energy Risk Management policy governing wholesale energy, transmission, ancillary services, renewable energy credit, and greenhouse gas….Res 31616 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originClimateElectricity Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Endorses the City Light Department’s Wholesale Energy Risk Management policy governing wholesale energy, transmission, ancillary services, renewable energy credit, and greenhouse gas….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 5, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ClimateElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the City Light Department; endorsing the City Light Department’s Wholesale Energy Risk Management policy governing wholesale energy, transmission, ancillary services, renewable energy credit, and greenhouse gas offset trading, and their risk management; establishing it as the policy governing the conduct of wholesale energy, renewable energy credit, and greenhouse gas offset risk management at the City Light Department; and superseding Resolutions 31467 and 31216.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light, or his or her designee, to execute the Amended and Restated….CB 118514 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light, or his or her designee, to execute the Amended and Restated….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124878October 5, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light, or his or her designee, to execute the Amended and Restated Agreement Limiting Liability Among Western Interconnected Electrical Systems, which enables City Light to manage and resolve inter-utility incidents with members of the Western Interconnected Electrical System and fosters the City Light Department’s customer relations and participation in important regional programs; and further authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of City Light, or his or her designee, to execute amendments to such agreement that are consistent with the intent and authority set forth in this ordinance.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees' Retirement System Board of Administration for 2016.Res 31619 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees' Retirement System Board of Administration for 2016.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 5, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION approving interest rates set by the Seattle City Employees' Retirement System Board of Administration for 2016.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses recommendations for improving the City of Seattle’s traffic incident management response.Res 31618 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTraffic SafetyPolice Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Endorses recommendations for improving the City of Seattle’s traffic incident management response.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 5, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic SafetyPolice
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing recommendations for improving the City of Seattle’s traffic incident management response; affirming the City’s commitment to traffic safety and mobility; recognizing the application of the state’s “Steer It Clear It” law, RCW 46.52.020(2)(a), and “Hold Harmless” law, RCW 46.52.020(2)(b), to drivers and police officers in the City; and directing the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs to pursue an extension of the “Hold Harmless” protection to Seattle Department of Transportation traffic incident response personnel.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118517 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124875October 5, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
AN ORDINANCE, relating to land use and zoning, amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes to the University Community Urban Center….CB 118470 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

AN ORDINANCE, relating to land use and zoning, amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes to the University Community Urban Center….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124888October 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE, relating to land use and zoning, amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes to the University Community Urban Center goals and policies, as well as the Future Land Use Map, as part of the periodic review and to incorporate changes proposed as part of the 2014-2015 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 2 opposed
Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes relating to housing affordability proposed as part of the 2014-2015 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment….CB 118471 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originZoning Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes relating to housing affordability proposed as part of the 2014-2015 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124886October 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending the Seattle Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes relating to housing affordability proposed as part of the 2014-2015 Comprehensive Plan annual amendment process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of the Department of Parks and Recreation to acquire by negotiation certain land and other necessary property rights, commonly….CB 118509 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of the Department of Parks and Recreation to acquire by negotiation certain land and other necessary property rights, commonly….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124880October 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of the Department of Parks and Recreation to acquire by negotiation certain land and other necessary property rights, commonly known as the northwest corner of 14th Avenue NE and NE 65th Street, for open space, park, and recreation purposes, and to execute, accept, and record the deed and instruments deemed by the Superintendent to be necessary; authorizing the Seattle City Attorney to commence condemnation proceedings; placing the acquired real property under the jurisdiction of the Department of Parks and Recreation and designating the property for open spaces, parks, and recreational purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the completion of a design refinements effort and a recommendations report for the west side portion of the project and recommending….RES 31611 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBridges & Structures Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Recognizing the completion of a design refinements effort and a recommendations report for the west side portion of the project and recommending….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Bridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the State Route 520, Interstate 5 to Medina Bridge Replacement and High Occupancy Vehicle Project; recognizing the completion of a design refinements effort and a recommendations report for the west side portion of the project and recommending actions by the City of Seattle and State of Washington based on results of this effort.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Supports American Indian and Alaskan Native communities’ efforts in calling on the United States Congress to commission a study and report on….Res 31621 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originYouth & EducationArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Supports American Indian and Alaskan Native communities’ efforts in calling on the United States Congress to commission a study and report on….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the acknowledgment of the various harms and ongoing historical and inter-generational traumas impacting American Indian, First Nations, and Alaskan Natives for the forcible removal of Indian children and subsequent abuse and neglect resulting from the United States’ American Indian Boarding School Policy during the 19th & 20th Centuries; supporting American Indian and Alaskan Native communities’ efforts in calling on the United States Congress to commission a study and report on the United States’ responsibility and role in adopting and implementing an American Indian Boarding School Policy; and committing to work with the local American Indian and Alaskan Natives in efforts of reconciliation in addressing the impacts of historical trauma, language and cultural loss, and alleged genocide.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the City Council’s intent to consider strategies to increase the availability of affordable housing in The City of Seattle.Res 31622 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable Housing Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the City Council’s intent to consider strategies to increase the availability of affordable housing in The City of Seattle.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 16, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring the City Council’s intent to consider strategies to increase the availability of affordable housing in The City of Seattle; requesting the State Legislature to adopt new policies or modify existing policies in order to provide additional opportunities for cities and counties to increase the availability of affordable housing; and repealing Resolution 31609.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118519 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124879October 16, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118521 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124884October 16, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Opposing Washington Initiative Measure 1366 and urging Seattle voters to vote “no” on Initiative 1366 on the November 3, 2015 general election….Res 31623 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Opposing Washington Initiative Measure 1366 and urging Seattle voters to vote “no” on Initiative 1366 on the November 3, 2015 general election….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 30, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION opposing Washington Initiative Measure 1366 and urging Seattle voters to vote “no” on Initiative 1366 on the November 3, 2015 general election ballot.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone: Executive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118524 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124889October 30, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses Washington Animal Trafficking, Initiative 1401, on the ballot in Washington on November 3, 2015.Res 31625 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Endorses Washington Animal Trafficking, Initiative 1401, on the ballot in Washington on November 3, 2015.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 30, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing Washington Animal Trafficking, Initiative 1401, on the ballot in Washington on November 3, 2015.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118526 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124891October 30, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118551 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124893November 3, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ratifying and confirming the Mayoral Proclamation of Civil Emergency and three orders related to homelessness of November 2, 2015.Res 31630 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessOrigin unclearHomelessness Services Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredOrigin unclear

ratifying and confirming the Mayoral Proclamation of Civil Emergency and three orders related to homelessness of November 2, 2015.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 3, 2015
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION ratifying and confirming the Mayoral Proclamation of Civil Emergency and three orders related to homelessness of November 2, 2015.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Stating the Council’s intent to make changes to zoning and land use regulations to implement a mandatory inclusionary affordable housing program for….Res 31612 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingZoningPermitting & Development Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Stating the Council’s intent to make changes to zoning and land use regulations to implement a mandatory inclusionary affordable housing program for….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION stating the Council’s intent to make changes to zoning and land use regulations to implement a mandatory inclusionary affordable housing program for residential development and an affordable housing impact mitigation program for commercial development recommended by the Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda Advisory Committee and the Mayor; clarifying the scope of changes to be considered; establishing minimum outreach, planning, and implementation requirements that must be met prior to Council consideration; and requesting regular reporting.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118555 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124894November 17, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a lease agreement with Oiselle Running Inc. to occupy and use a….CB 118488 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a lease agreement with Oiselle Running Inc. to occupy and use a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124897November 24, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to enter into a lease agreement with Oiselle Running Inc. to occupy and use a portion of Building 11 at Warren G. Magnuson Park for general office purposes.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $758,138. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118564 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124896November 24, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Resolutions 31498 and 31499.Res 31638 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Resolutions 31498 and 31499.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 30, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION amending Resolutions 31498 and 31499; updating the committee membership of the standing committees of the Seattle City Council for the final month of 2015, and Councilmember participation on King County Committees, Regional Committees, State Committees, and City of Seattle Committees.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone: Executive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Repealing Ordinance 122199 relating to the General Fund, Parks Fund, and Solid Waste Fund.CB 118528 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originSolid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Repealing Ordinance 122199 relating to the General Fund, Parks Fund, and Solid Waste Fund.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124911December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Transfer Tax and Collection Tax; repealing Ordinance 122199 relating to the General Fund, Parks Fund, and Solid Waste Fund.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts new principles to guide the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Street Use Division and the City Budget Office in preparing and authorizing….Res 31627 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts new principles to guide the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Street Use Division and the City Budget Office in preparing and authorizing….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting new principles to guide the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Street Use Division and the City Budget Office in preparing and authorizing budget contingencies to meet demand for services in excess of the level planned in the biennial budget for the Street Use Division.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 121940, as amended by Ordinance 122498, to conform Ordinance 121940 to reflect changes recently made by the City to update….CB 118544 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originSolid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 121940, as amended by Ordinance 122498, to conform Ordinance 121940 to reflect changes recently made by the City to update….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124915December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Solid WasteTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the solid waste system of The City of Seattle; amending Ordinance 121940, as amended by Ordinance 122498, to conform Ordinance 121940 to reflect changes recently made by the City to update its standard form of bond ordinance; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2016.CB 118552 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2016.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124927December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Workplace StandardsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE adopting a budget, including a capital improvement program and position modifications, for The City of Seattle for 2016; and creating positions exempt from civil service; all by a two-thirds vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Related to publicly financed elections creating a fund for election vouchers.CB 118569 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originElections Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to publicly financed elections creating a fund for election vouchers.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124928December 1, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Elections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to publicly financed elections creating a fund for election vouchers.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118573 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124898December 1, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating a subterranean portion of the west side of 5th Avenue between Columbia Street and Marion Street, on the petition of Fifth….CB 118598 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating a subterranean portion of the west side of 5th Avenue between Columbia Street and Marion Street, on the petition of Fifth….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124941December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating a subterranean portion of the west side of 5th Avenue between Columbia Street and Marion Street, on the petition of Fifth & Columbia Investors, LLC (Clerk File 309447).

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares real property in the City of Lake Forest Park known as the Kenmore Reservoir Site to be surplus to The City….CB 118494 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originParks & RecreationTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares real property in the City of Lake Forest Park known as the Kenmore Reservoir Site to be surplus to The City….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124936December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationTrees & HabitatWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the water system of Seattle Public Utilities; declaring real property in the City of Lake Forest Park known as the Kenmore Reservoir Site to be surplus to The City of Seattle’s needs and authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to sell the property through an open competitive process.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $700,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants conceptual approval to SP Greenwood LLC to construct and maintain a public art installation on a portion of Northwest 85th Street….Res 31629 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants conceptual approval to SP Greenwood LLC to construct and maintain a public art installation on a portion of Northwest 85th Street….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to SP Greenwood LLC to construct and maintain a public art installation on a portion of Northwest 85th Street, west of 1st Avenue Northwest, as part of the Janus mixed-use project.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts the gift of an automated bicycle counter display and funding for installation of the display.CB 118572 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTraffic Safety Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts the gift of an automated bicycle counter display and funding for installation of the display.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124942December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting the gift of an automated bicycle counter display and funding for installation of the display; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $20,600. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs.CB 118566 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124938December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs; granting non-exclusive easements to The City of Renton for an ingress and egress roadway, including related slope and drainage utility purposes, and a temporary construction easement, upon, under, and across a portion of the City’s Cedar River Pipeline right-of-way, located in the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 21, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $108,094. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating the northern 273 feet of the alley in Block 93, D.T. Denny's First Addition to North Seattle in the block bounded….CB 118571 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating the northern 273 feet of the alley in Block 93, D.T. Denny's First Addition to North Seattle in the block bounded….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124940December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the northern 273 feet of the alley in Block 93, D.T. Denny's First Addition to North Seattle in the block bounded by Mercer Street, Westlake Avenue North, Republican Street, and 9th Avenue North in the South Lake Union neighborhood of Seattle, on the petition of City Place VI, LLC (Clerk File 312425).

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2016 State Legislative Agenda.Res 31634 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Sets forth The City of Seattle’s 2016 State Legislative Agenda.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION setting forth The City of Seattle’s 2016 State Legislative Agenda.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118586 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124931December 4, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.Res 31639 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 14, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council; superseding Resolutions 31489 and 31561.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone: Executive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to execute amendments to wheeling agreements between The City of Seattle and North City Water….CB 118565 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & Wastewater Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to execute amendments to wheeling agreements between The City of Seattle and North City Water….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124965December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to execute amendments to wheeling agreements between The City of Seattle and North City Water District and between The City of Seattle and Olympic View Water and Sewer District.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts an easement situated adjacent to Seward Park granted to The City of Seattle for construction and abandoning-in-place of horizontal construction tiebacks.CB 118575 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts an easement situated adjacent to Seward Park granted to The City of Seattle for construction and abandoning-in-place of horizontal construction tiebacks.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124953December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; accepting an easement situated adjacent to Seward Park granted to The City of Seattle for construction and abandoning-in-place of horizontal construction tiebacks; placing the easement under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $26,472. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Creates an Arts & Cultural District in the Central Area of Seattle.Res 31635 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originArts & Culture Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Creates an Arts & Cultural District in the Central Area of Seattle.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION creating an Arts & Cultural District in the Central Area of Seattle.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes new salaries that implement 2016 increases required by Ordinance 124490.CB 118593 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-originWorkplace Standards Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes new salaries that implement 2016 increases required by Ordinance 124490.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124959December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Workplace Standards
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to City employment commonly referred to as the Fourth Quarter 2015 Employment Ordinance; establishing new salaries that implement 2016 increases required by Ordinance 124490; amending Ordinance 124927; increasing funds; designating positions as exempt from Civil Service status; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $169,971. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights relating to drainage and wastewater facility easements within the City of Seattle as being surplus to City….CB 118579 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights relating to drainage and wastewater facility easements within the City of Seattle as being surplus to City….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124954December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights relating to drainage and wastewater facility easements within the City of Seattle as being surplus to City utility needs; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to relinquish such easement rights and accepting new easements for City-owned drainage and wastewater facilities; placing the real property rights and interests conveyed by the easements under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with Kitsap County to acquire Light Detection and Ranging….CB 118589 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with Kitsap County to acquire Light Detection and Ranging….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124955December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the Director of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with Kitsap County to acquire Light Detection and Ranging data; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $63,700. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Recognizing the obstacles faced by previously incarcerated individuals that often result in recidivism, and the potential to reduce recidivism rates, criminal justice….Res 31637 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Recognizing the obstacles faced by previously incarcerated individuals that often result in recidivism, and the potential to reduce recidivism rates, criminal justice….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION recognizing the obstacles faced by previously incarcerated individuals that often result in recidivism, and the potential to reduce recidivism rates, criminal justice costs, and incarceration’s negative impacts on individuals, the community, and the City of Seattle; requesting the Mayor to establish a Prisoner and Community Corrections Re-entry Work Group composed of residents, City departments, the Seattle Municipal Court, and the Legislative Department to coordinate and strengthen the City’s efforts to assist prisoner community re-entry.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Re-affirming the City’s commitment to gender pay equity and expressing the City’s intent to join 100% Talent, a regional Gender Pay Equity….Res 31636 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Re-affirming the City’s commitment to gender pay equity and expressing the City’s intent to join 100% Talent, a regional Gender Pay Equity….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsJean Godden
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION re-affirming the City’s commitment to gender pay equity and expressing the City’s intent to join 100% Talent, a regional Gender Pay Equity Initiative, as a founding member, and to help implement the Initiative as a means to strengthen gender pay equity in Seattle and the region.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $25,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 122424 to revise reporting requirements of operating streetcar lines.CB 118587 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originTransit Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 122424 to revise reporting requirements of operating streetcar lines.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124946December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Streetcar; amending Ordinance 122424 to revise reporting requirements of operating streetcar lines.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone: Executive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating the south 168 feet of the alley adjacent to Lots 17 through 24, lying between Block 55 and Block 56, Boston….CB 118592 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksNeighborhoods Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating the south 168 feet of the alley adjacent to Lots 17 through 24, lying between Block 55 and Block 56, Boston….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124967December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the south 168 feet of the alley adjacent to Lots 17 through 24, lying between Block 55 and Block 56, Boston Company's Plat of West Seattle, near the Alaska Junction of the West Seattle neighborhood of Seattle, on the petition of Fauntleroy Place LLC (Clerk File 308171), and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118590 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124944December 17, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares the support for passage of the Seattle School District's Proposition 1 Operations Levy and Proposition 2 Buildings, Technology and Academics/Athletics IV….RES 31640 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTechnology & BroadbandYouth & EducationElections Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares the support for passage of the Seattle School District's Proposition 1 Operations Levy and Proposition 2 Buildings, Technology and Academics/Athletics IV….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Technology & BroadbandYouth & EducationElections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring the support for passage of the Seattle School District's Proposition 1 Operations Levy and Proposition 2 Buildings, Technology and Academics/Athletics IV Capital Levy, on the February 9, 2016 ballot.

Reach 1: the direct beneficiaries are a defined population, place, or multi-neighborhood area. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.CB 118594 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceOrigin unclearBudget & Appropriations Up to 3 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124956December 17, 2015
Official sponsorsNick Licata
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE appropriating money to pay certain audited claims and ordering the payment thereof.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. preserved audited historical unclear-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing the City Council’s intent to improve the accommodation of people with hearing disabilities in City facilities.Res 31641 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing the City Council’s intent to improve the accommodation of people with hearing disabilities in City facilities.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing the City Council’s intent to improve the accommodation of people with hearing disabilities in City facilities.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares support for Muslim communities, affirming the religious pluralism of the United States, and urging Seattle residents to stand together for peace….Res 31642 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 3 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares support for Muslim communities, affirming the religious pluralism of the United States, and urging Seattle residents to stand together for peace….

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION declaring support for Muslim communities, affirming the religious pluralism of the United States, and urging Seattle residents to stand together for peace and understanding.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacates a Denny Triangle alley and accepts a related property-use and development agreement.CB 121117 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Arts, Culture & CommunityDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacates a Denny Triangle alley and accepts a related property-use and development agreement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127387January 27, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the alley in Block 24, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition, in the Denny Triangle neighborhood; and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement, on the petition of GID Development Group and the Seattle Parks and Recreation Department (Clerk File 313843).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,070,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets a vision and design principles for a regional transportation hub beside Westlake Park.Res 32191 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originParks & RecreationNeighborhoods Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets a vision and design principles for a regional transportation hub beside Westlake Park.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 5, 2026
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying the opportunity to develop a regional transportation hub adjacent to Westlake Park; creating a vision for how this hub will integrate with the surrounding neighborhoods; and setting forth directions for functionality, safety, and urban compatibility, along with guiding principles for the public projects planned for the area adjacent to Westlake Park.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Sets expectations for professional law-enforcement conduct and directs Seattle police to document violations.Res 32193 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Sets expectations for professional law-enforcement conduct and directs Seattle police to document violations.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 5, 2026
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to law enforcement officer professionalism and standards; reaffirming Seattle values related to professional law enforcement conduct; condemning recent actions of federal law enforcement agents; articulating expectations for law enforcement conduct within Seattle; and directing Seattle Police Department officers to document and report violations of law enforcement professionalism standards.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
States Seattle's readiness and public support for bringing an NBA team to Climate Pledge Arena.Res 32198 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Economy & Small BusinessDepartment-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

States Seattle's readiness and public support for bringing an NBA team to Climate Pledge Arena.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 14, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution affirming The City of Seattle’s readiness for a National Basketball Association (NBA) team; declaring that Climate Pledge Arena is ready for an NBA team; and affirming Seattle is a basketball city.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Places permanent landmark controls on the historic Woodin House.CB 121197 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Places permanent landmark controls on the historic Woodin House.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127435May 22, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Woodin House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Orders safeguards and recommendations on whether the regional homelessness authority should continue, restructure, or dissolve.Res 32202 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Orders safeguards and recommendations on whether the regional homelessness authority should continue, restructure, or dissolve.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 4, 2026
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution regarding next steps after the forensic evaluation of the King County Regional Homelessness Authority (KCRHA); requesting that the Seattle Mayor take steps to immediately safeguard public funds, provide an initial assessment of whether it is feasible for KCRHA to adequately address all of the findings in the forensic evaluation, recommend if KCRHA should be dissolved, restructured, or continue as is, submit a set of next steps on how the City will approach the dissolution or restructure of KCRHA if determined to be necessary, and submit monthly reports to Council.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves a property owner's application for reduced taxes under a county public-benefit rating program.CB 121211 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves a property owner's application for reduced taxes under a county public-benefit rating program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127441June 4, 2026
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to current use taxation; approving an application for classification of property located at 4807 SW 54th Street under the King County Public Benefit Rating System.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests a study of how data centers could affect utilities, land use, jobs, and public health.Res 32204 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & DevelopmentElectricityWater & Wastewater Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a study of how data centers could affect utilities, land use, jobs, and public health.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 12, 2026
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentElectricityWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution relating to data centers; committing to studying the potential for data centers to impact electrical grid capacity and reliability, water usage, utility rates, land use and development, jobs and the economy, and public health; and requesting engagement and cooperation from the Executive in the development of data center policies and potential legislation; and anticipates related legislative action.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Directs capital planning for Seattle Center renovations and explores bond and other funding options.Res 32205 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-originArts & CultureBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Directs capital planning for Seattle Center renovations and explores bond and other funding options.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 12, 2026
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Arts & CultureBudget & AppropriationsTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution affirming the importance of Seattle Center as a central civic, cultural, and economic asset for The City of Seattle; acknowledging the urgent imperative to restore its aging infrastructure and grounds, renovate its buildings, and revitalize the Seattle Center Campus; requesting that the Mayor direct City departments in a capital planning effort for Seattle Center; anticipating a decision on a bond measure to fund its capital investment by the end of 2027; committing to exploring all viable funding options to support its modernization; declaring Council priorities and calling upon the Executive to direct departmental resources and budget allocations in support of its capital improvements.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates the Burwell House as a Seattle landmark and imposes preservation controls.CB 121273 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designates the Burwell House as a Seattle landmark and imposes preservation controls.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127500August 21, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Burwell House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates the Wilde-Streatfield House as a Seattle landmark and imposes preservation controls.CB 121274 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designates the Wilde-Streatfield House as a Seattle landmark and imposes preservation controls.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127499August 21, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Wilde-Streatfield House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests a report on transit-security improvements, services, and policy.SLI SDOT-107S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a report on transit-security improvements, services, and policy.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide a report on implementing transit security improvements, services, and policy

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests recommendations for updating Seattle’s honorary street-naming policies.SLI SDOT-106S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests recommendations for updating Seattle’s honorary street-naming policies.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide recommendations on honorary street naming policies

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a report on pothole repairs and roadway-condition performance measures.SLI SDOT-105S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a report on pothole repairs and roadway-condition performance measures.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide a report on the pothole repair program and performance indicators for potholes and roadway conditions

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a report on measures used to evaluate potential bus-only lanes.SLI SDOT-104S-B · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a report on measures used to evaluate potential bus-only lanes.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide a report on the performance measures and evaluation criteria used for consideration of bus-only lanes

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests citywide and municipal plans for arts and culture.SLI ARTS-011S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-originArts & Culture Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests citywide and municipal plans for arts and culture.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that ARTS create citywide and municipal arts plans

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a Police Department report on automated sound-enforcement technology.SLI SPD-111S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPoliceTechnology & Broadband Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a Police Department report on automated sound-enforcement technology.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
PoliceTechnology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on automated sound enforcement technology

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a Police Department report on officer recruitment and retention.SLI SPD-110S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a Police Department report on officer recruitment and retention.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on officer recruitment and retention

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a Police Department study of childcare options for sworn employees.SLI SPD-109S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a Police Department study of childcare options for sworn employees.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD study childcare options for sworn employees

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a report on citywide emergency-preparedness training and agency coordination.SLI OEM-102S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a report on citywide emergency-preparedness training and agency coordination.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsRobert Kettle
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OEM report on city-wide emergency preparedness training, and recognize OEM's key role among Seattle's public safety departments

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests a crisis-response dashboard and reporting on the Seattle Restoration Program.SLI CARE-101S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a crisis-response dashboard and reporting on the Seattle Restoration Program.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest CARE create Community Crisis Responder public data dashboard and request reporting on Seattle Restoration Program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests reporting on CARE’s call-center staffing levels and operations.SLI CARE-001S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests reporting on CARE’s call-center staffing levels and operations.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest reporting from CARE on Call Center staffing and operations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a timeline for redeveloping the Lake City Community Center.SLI SPR-014S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-originLibraries & Community Facilities Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a timeline for redeveloping the Lake City Community Center.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Libraries & Community Facilities
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPR report on the timeline for redeveloping the Lake City Community Center

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a current inventory of youth programs receiving City funding.SLI MO-002S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a current inventory of youth programs receiving City funding.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Executive provide a current inventory of City-funded youth programs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests a report on tree data, enforcement, and payments made instead of planting.SLI SDCI-004S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a report on tree data, enforcement, and payments made instead of planting.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDCI provide a report on tree-related data, enforcement, and the payment-in-lieu program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a plan supporting small businesses through the Equitable Development Initiative.SLI OPCD-005S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & DevelopmentSmall BusinessEconomic Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a plan supporting small businesses through the Equitable Development Initiative.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsCathy Moore, Maritza Rivera
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & DevelopmentSmall BusinessEconomic Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OPCD develop a plan to support small business economic development through the Equitable Development Initiative

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests strategies for attracting food retailers to underserved neighborhoods.SLI OPCD-003S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests strategies for attracting food retailers to underserved neighborhoods.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OPCD report on strategies to attract food retailers to food deserts

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests exploration of bonds and master leasing to develop affordable housing.SLI OH-004S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests exploration of bonds and master leasing to develop affordable housing.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Affordable HousingPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OH explore use of bonds and master leasing for development of affordable housing

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests a report proposing a comprehensive strategy for recreational vehicles.SLI MO-003S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a report proposing a comprehensive strategy for recreational vehicles.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest a report from MO on a comprehensive Recreational Vehicle strategy

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests analysis and an implementation plan addressing gun violence in Seattle schools.SLI HSD-038S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests analysis and an implementation plan addressing gun violence in Seattle schools.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the HSD report on a landscape analysis and an implementation plan for addressing gun violence in Seattle schools

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a Human Services report on Seattle’s need for a sobering center.SLI HSD-031S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a Human Services report on Seattle’s need for a sobering center.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera, Sara Nelson
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD report on sobering center needs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests a midyear update on programs designed to build wealth in communities of color.SLI OED-008S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a midyear update on programs designed to build wealth in communities of color.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED provide a mid-year status update on the programs offered under the “Generating Wealth in Communities of Color” pillar

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a report on past City budget underspending and grants.SLI CBO-003S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a report on past City budget underspending and grants.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO report on past budget underspend and grants

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests a report on creating a responsible contractor policy for City contracts.SLI FAS-004S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a report on creating a responsible contractor policy for City contracts.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that FAS report on implementing a comprehensive responsible contractor policy for City contracts

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Vacates a First Hill alley and accepts a related development agreement and utility easement.CB 120945 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentElectricity Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacates a First Hill alley and accepts a related development agreement and utility easement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127214May 16, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the alley in Block 52, A. A. Denny’s Extension to the Terry’s 1st Addition, in the First Hill neighborhood, and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement and acknowledging the Seattle City Light Easement, on the petition of North Block Spring Street Development LLC (Clerk File 314364).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,500,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Reaffirms Seattle as a welcoming city committed to supporting all residents.Res 32168 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originAccessibility Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Reaffirms Seattle as a welcoming city committed to supporting all residents.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 28, 2025
Official sponsorsAlexis Mercedes Rinck
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accessibility
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming The City of Seattle as a Welcoming City; and committing to maintaining policies that support all Seattle residents regardless of ancestry, race, ethnicity, national origin, color, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, physical or mental disability, religion, or immigration status.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves reduced property taxes for a site under King County’s public-benefit program.CB 120997 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves reduced property taxes for a site under King County’s public-benefit program.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127234June 23, 2025
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to current use taxation; approving an application for current use taxation of property located at 9666 51st Avenue South under the King County Public Benefit Rating System.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts donated improvements for Westlake Park from the Seattle Parks Foundation.CB 121057 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts donated improvements for Westlake Park from the Seattle Parks Foundation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127284September 5, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Parks and Recreation; authorizing the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation to accept, for and on behalf of the City, certain donated improvements from the Seattle Parks Foundation for Westlake Park, identified as King County parcel number 197570-0175 at 401 Pine Street; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedParks and Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes landmark protections for Tolliver Temple Church of God in Christ.CB 121075 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes landmark protections for Tolliver Temple Church of God in Christ.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127293September 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon Tolliver Temple Church of God in Christ, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes acquisition of ten permanent utility easements for Seattle Public Utilities.CB 121069 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes acquisition of ten permanent utility easements for Seattle Public Utilities.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127312September 26, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the acquisition of certain real property rights by negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation) of ten separate permanent easements located on parcels identified as King County Parcel Number 2487201221 located at 4500 & 4502 SW Wildwood Place, King County Parcel Number 2487201215 located at 4518 SW Wildwood Place, King County Parcel Number 2485500000 located at 9165 45th Avenue SW, King County Parcel Number 2487201365, King County Parcel Number 2488200480 located at 9144 45th Avenue SW, King County Parcel Number 3524039040 located at 9131 California Avenue SW, King County Parcel Number 2488200505, King County Parcel Number 2488200500, King County Parcel Number 2488200495, King County Parcel Number 2488200490; and authorizing the acquisition of temporary construction easements by negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation) located on eighteen separate parcels of land identified as King County Parcel Number 2487201221 located at 4502 SW Wildwood Place, King County Parcel Number 2346700000 located at 9212 45th Avenue SW, King County Parcel Number 2485500000 located at 9165 45th Avenue SW, King County Parcel Number 2487200035 located at 4402 SW Brace Point Drive, King County Parcel Number 2487200050 located at 4330 SW Brace Point Drive, King County Parcel Number 2487201210 located at 4604 SW Wildwood Place, King County Parcel Number 2487201215 located at 4518 SW Wildwood Place, King County Parcel Number 2487201365, King County Parcel Number 2488200480 located at 9144 45th Avenue SW, King County Parcel Number 3524039040 located at 9131 California Avenue SW, King County Parcel Number 2488200530, King County Parcel Number 2488200525, King County Parcel Number 2488200520, King County Parcel Number 2488200515 located at 4401 SW Director Street; King County Parcel Number 2488200505; King County Parcel Number 2488200500; King County Parcel Number 2488200495; and King County Parcel Number 2488200490; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to execute all documents and take other necessary actions to complete the Properties’ permanent easement acquisitions and temporary construction easement acquisitions; authorizing payment of all costs associated with the acquisitions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,200,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes landmark protections for the historic Stewart House.CB 121139 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes landmark protections for the historic Stewart House.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127370December 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Stewart House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Establishes permanent landmark protections for líq’tәd–Licton Springs Park.CB 121140 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationParks & Recreation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Establishes permanent landmark protections for líq’tәd–Licton Springs Park.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127371December 22, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon líq’tәd - Licton Springs Park, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Directs departments to advance the One Seattle Plan and prepare additional 2026 amendments.Res 32183 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Directs departments to advance the One Seattle Plan and prepare additional 2026 amendments.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 22, 2025
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the One Seattle Plan Comprehensive Plan update; calling for additional measures by City departments to further advance the goals of the One Seattle Plan; and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community Development and other City departments develop additional amendments to the Comprehensive Plan in 2026.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests a report on community facilities in future light rail station areas.SLI SDOT-004S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a report on community facilities in future light rail station areas.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on community facilities in future light rail station areas

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests an implementation report for Ballard-Interbay regional transportation improvements.SLI SDOT-003S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests an implementation report for Ballard-Interbay regional transportation improvements.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide a report on implementing the Ballard-Interbay Regional Transportation System improvements

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests initial cost estimates for alternatives to traditional sidewalks at specified locations.SLI SDOT-002S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests initial cost estimates for alternatives to traditional sidewalks at specified locations.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide initial cost estimates for alternatives to traditional sidewalks in specified locations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a report on the Fire Department's Post Overdose Response Team pilot.SLI SFD-801S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a report on the Fire Department's Post Overdose Response Team pilot.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SFD report on the Post Overdose Response Team pilot

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests an evaluation of Chinatown-International District alley waste collection and alternatives.SLI SPU-801S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests an evaluation of Chinatown-International District alley waste collection and alternatives.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPU evaluate the Clear Alleys Program in the Chinatown-International District and consider alternative waste removal solutions

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests options for faster responses to emergency housing and tree-cutting complaints.SLI SDCI-802S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests options for faster responses to emergency housing and tree-cutting complaints.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDCI provide options to improve complaint response times including off-hour emergency housing and tree cutting complaints

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests Human Services reports on funding for substance-use-disorder treatment.SLI HSD-813S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originBehavioral Health Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests Human Services reports on funding for substance-use-disorder treatment.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Behavioral Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD provide reports related to funding for substance use disorder treatment

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests reports on LEAD referrals, funding needs, and data integration.SLI HSD-017S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests reports on LEAD referrals, funding needs, and data integration.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD report on referrals to Let Everyone Advance with Dignity (LEAD) and the funding required to support them and on LEAD data integration

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a citywide analysis and coordinated strategy for childcare supply and access.SLI OED-806S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a citywide analysis and coordinated strategy for childcare supply and access.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED develop a landscape analysis and a coordinated City approach towards maintaining or increasing childcare supply and access

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests consistent policies for naming or renaming City properties, streets, and structures.SLI MO-001S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests consistent policies for naming or renaming City properties, streets, and structures.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Mayor's Office adopt or revise departmental naming or renaming policies for City- owned properties, streets, and structures

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Requests a work group and recommendations on disposing of surplus City property.SLI FAS-801S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Requests a work group and recommendations on disposing of surplus City property.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 26, 2024
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Debora Juarez
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Executive convene a work group on disposition policies for surplus City-owned properties and submit a report with recommendations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Approves reduced current-use taxation for property at 4613 South Lucile Street.CB 120800 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves reduced current-use taxation for property at 4613 South Lucile Street.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127049July 9, 2024
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to current use taxation; approving an application for current use taxation of property located at 4613 South Lucile Street under the King County Public Benefit Rating System.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates the East Pine Substation as a protected Seattle landmark.CB 120479 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designates the East Pine Substation as a protected Seattle landmark.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127081September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the East Pine Substation, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates the Georgetown Steam Plant Pump House as a protected Seattle landmark.CB 120480 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designates the Georgetown Steam Plant Pump House as a protected Seattle landmark.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127082September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Georgetown Steam Plant Pump House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates former Fire Station 26 as a protected Seattle landmark.CB 120562 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designates former Fire Station 26 as a protected Seattle landmark.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127083September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon former Fire Station 26, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates the Bloch House as a protected Seattle landmark.CB 120849 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designates the Bloch House as a protected Seattle landmark.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127088September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Bloch House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates the Continental Hotel as a protected Seattle landmark.CB 120850 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designates the Continental Hotel as a protected Seattle landmark.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127089September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Continental Hotel, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates the Beacon Hill Garden House as a protected Seattle landmark.CB 120851 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designates the Beacon Hill Garden House as a protected Seattle landmark.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127090September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Beacon Hill Garden House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates the Cettolin House as a protected Seattle landmark.CB 120852 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designates the Cettolin House as a protected Seattle landmark.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127091September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Cettolin House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Designates the University of Washington's Anderson Hall as a protected Seattle landmark.CB 120853 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Designates the University of Washington's Anderson Hall as a protected Seattle landmark.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127092September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsMaritza Rivera
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon University of Washington Anderson Hall, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Acquires two King County parcels for salmon habitat and watershed protection.CB 120854 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originTrees & HabitatCity Property Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Acquires two King County parcels for salmon habitat and watershed protection.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127093September 24, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Trees & HabitatCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the acquisition by negotiation of two parcels of land identified as King County parcel numbers 2752200050 and 2752200091 located at 21226 221st Avenue SE in King County for salmon habitat protection and watershed management; granting a life estate to Helen R. Sherry; authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute, accept, and record deeds and conveyance documents and take any other actions reasonably necessary on behalf of the City; placing the properties under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves applications for current use taxation of properties located at 8240 43rd Avenue NE and 711 NE 43rd Street under the King….CB 120483 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves applications for current use taxation of properties located at 8240 43rd Avenue NE and 711 NE 43rd Street under the King….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126748January 10, 2023
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to current use taxation; approving applications for current use taxation of properties located at 8240 43rd Avenue NE and 711 NE 43rd Street under the King County Public Benefit Rating System, and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Seattle-First National Bank Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….CB 120312 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Seattle-First National Bank Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126749January 13, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Seattle-First National Bank Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Request that SPU support the Lake Washington sockeye salmon co-managers as they assess the ongoing feasibility of transporting sockeye salmon through the….SLI SPU-313-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPU support the Lake Washington sockeye salmon co-managers as they assess the ongoing feasibility of transporting sockeye salmon through the….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPU support the Lake Washington sockeye salmon co-managers as they assess the ongoing feasibility of transporting sockeye salmon through the Lake Washington Ship Canal, and provide a report describing those efforts

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that SDOT report on sidewalk alternatives.SLI SDOT-610-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT report on sidewalk alternatives.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on sidewalk alternatives

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT provide a report on implementing the Ballard-Interbay Regional Transportation System improvements.SLI SDOT-607-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT provide a report on implementing the Ballard-Interbay Regional Transportation System improvements.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide a report on implementing the Ballard-Interbay Regional Transportation System improvements

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT report on Downtown Seattle mobility needs.SLI SDOT-306-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT report on Downtown Seattle mobility needs.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on Downtown Seattle mobility needs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT address Council priorities in the development of the Seattle Transportation Plan.SLI SDOT-305-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT address Council priorities in the development of the Seattle Transportation Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT address Council priorities in the development of the Seattle Transportation Plan

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT provide recommendations on City and State parking rate policy.SLI SDOT-303-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT provide recommendations on City and State parking rate policy.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide recommendations on City and State parking rate policy

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that SDOT estimate the cost of manufacturing and installing historic street name signs.SLI SDOT-302-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT estimate the cost of manufacturing and installing historic street name signs.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT estimate the cost of manufacturing and installing historic street name signs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that SDOT report on constituent issue tracking and response.SLI SDOT-301-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT report on constituent issue tracking and response.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on constituent issue tracking and response

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDCI report on a work program for regulatory changes for small landlords.SLI SDCI-601-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDCI report on a work program for regulatory changes for small landlords.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDCI report on a work program for regulatory changes for small landlords

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SPD report on emphasis patrols.SLI SPD-303-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on emphasis patrols.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on emphasis patrols

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SPD report on Stage 2 of the Risk Management Demand (RMD) project.SLI SPD-302-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on Stage 2 of the Risk Management Demand (RMD) project.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on Stage 2 of the Risk Management Demand (RMD) project

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that SPD report on police staffing, overtime, finances and performance metrics.SLI SPD-301-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on police staffing, overtime, finances and performance metrics.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on police staffing, overtime, finances and performance metrics

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that SFD report on staffing, overtime, finances, and performance metrics.SLI SFD-300-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SFD report on staffing, overtime, finances, and performance metrics.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SFD report on staffing, overtime, finances, and performance metrics

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that LAW conduct a racial equity toolkit on domestic violence (DV) prosecutions and report to the Council on how it can….SLI LAW-301-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that LAW conduct a racial equity toolkit on domestic violence (DV) prosecutions and report to the Council on how it can….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that LAW conduct a racial equity toolkit on domestic violence (DV) prosecutions and report to the Council on how it can implement DV workgroup recommendations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that the Mayor’s Office, with the collaboration of HSD, develop a plan to fund addiction treatment using proceeds from the State….SLI HSD-605-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the Mayor’s Office, with the collaboration of HSD, develop a plan to fund addiction treatment using proceeds from the State….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Mayor’s Office, with the collaboration of HSD, develop a plan to fund addiction treatment using proceeds from the State settlement against opioid medication distributors

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that HSD provide a report on contracting with human services providers.SLI HSD-300-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originHuman Services & Food Security Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD provide a report on contracting with human services providers.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Human Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD provide a report on contracting with human services providers

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that CBO report on use of 9-1-1 excise tax revenue.SLI CBO-600-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CBO report on use of 9-1-1 excise tax revenue.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO report on use of 9-1-1 excise tax revenue

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that the Executive provide recommendations for a permanent home department for the City's parking enforcement unit.SLI CBO-320-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the Executive provide recommendations for a permanent home department for the City's parking enforcement unit.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Executive provide recommendations for a permanent home department for the City's parking enforcement unit

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SPR report on funding for an after-school program for resettled and immigrant children living in subsidized housing in Magnuson Park.SLI SPR-301-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originParks & RecreationYouth & EducationImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPR report on funding for an after-school program for resettled and immigrant children living in subsidized housing in Magnuson Park.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Parks & RecreationYouth & EducationImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPR report on funding for an after-school program for resettled and immigrant children living in subsidized housing in Magnuson Park

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Instructing Office of Housing and Seattle Parks and Recreation to report to Council on a plan to use the property known as….SLI OH-601-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingParks & Recreation Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Instructing Office of Housing and Seattle Parks and Recreation to report to Council on a plan to use the property known as….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Affordable HousingParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleInstructing Office of Housing and Seattle Parks and Recreation to report to Council on a plan to use the property known as the “Belltown Cottages” for low-income housing

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that DEEL provide a report on all current and potential sources of funds for student mental health supports.SLI DEEL-602-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originBehavioral Health Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DEEL provide a report on all current and potential sources of funds for student mental health supports.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Behavioral Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DEEL provide a report on all current and potential sources of funds for student mental health supports

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that DEEL create a proposal for the use of all remaining Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy underspend through 2022 to….SLI DEEL-302-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DEEL create a proposal for the use of all remaining Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy underspend through 2022 to….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DEEL create a proposal for the use of all remaining Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy underspend through 2022 to go toward Early Learning and K-12 programs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that DEEL provide draft legislation for Council consideration to prioritize enrollment in the Seattle Promise program.SLI DEEL-301-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DEEL provide draft legislation for Council consideration to prioritize enrollment in the Seattle Promise program.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DEEL provide draft legislation for Council consideration to prioritize enrollment in the Seattle Promise program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that SDCI promulgate a rule and report to the Council, or transmit legislation with regulatory changes to the Council, on proposed….SLI SDCI-602-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentSolid Waste Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDCI promulgate a rule and report to the Council, or transmit legislation with regulatory changes to the Council, on proposed….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentSolid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDCI promulgate a rule and report to the Council, or transmit legislation with regulatory changes to the Council, on proposed development standards for alleys, loading berths, and solid waste storage facilities

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that OSE provide a report on Citywide funding for tree planting, stewardship, and other urban forestry-related activities.SLI OSE-301-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OSE provide a report on Citywide funding for tree planting, stewardship, and other urban forestry-related activities.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OSE provide a report on Citywide funding for tree planting, stewardship, and other urban forestry-related activities

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that CEN report on scope and funding for Memorial Stadium Redevelopment.SLI CEN-602-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CEN report on scope and funding for Memorial Stadium Redevelopment.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CEN report on scope and funding for Memorial Stadium Redevelopment

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that OH review options for non-permanent supportive housing services funding and pre-development and/or organizational capacity funding in development of the proposed….SLI OH-300-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OH review options for non-permanent supportive housing services funding and pre-development and/or organizational capacity funding in development of the proposed….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Affordable HousingPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OH review options for non-permanent supportive housing services funding and pre-development and/or organizational capacity funding in development of the proposed housing levy renewal package

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that SCL report on new sources of green power.SLI SCL-301-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originElectricity Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SCL report on new sources of green power.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SCL report on new sources of green power

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Request that OED provide a report on the impacts of business technical assistance in high displacement risk neighborhoods.SLI OED-602-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-originNeighborhoods Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED provide a report on the impacts of business technical assistance in high displacement risk neighborhoods.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED provide a report on the impacts of business technical assistance in high displacement risk neighborhoods

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request a pre-budget report from FAS and LAW on judgment and claims expenses.SLI FAS-303-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request a pre-budget report from FAS and LAW on judgment and claims expenses.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest a pre-budget report from FAS and LAW on judgment and claims expenses

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that OED provide a report on the Seattle Jobs Center.SLI OED-301-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED provide a report on the Seattle Jobs Center.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED provide a report on the Seattle Jobs Center

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Authorizes the acquisition of real property identified in King County records as Parcel A of City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 8701076….CB 120539 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCity Property Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property identified in King County records as Parcel A of City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 8701076….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126797April 20, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services (on behalf of Seattle Public Utilities); authorizing the acquisition of real property identified in King County records as Parcel A of City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 8701076 under recording no. 8706120917, records of King County, Washington (the “Property”); authorizing the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or the Director’s designee to execute all documents and take other necessary actions to complete the Property’s acquisition, including acceptance and recording of a deed; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $850,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 53 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the western 15,943….CB 120533 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originStreets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 53 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the western 15,943….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126804May 2, 2023
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksZoningPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 53 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the western 15,943 square feet of the parcel located at 2501 Northwest Market Street from Industrial Commercial with a 65 foot height limit and an M Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (IC 65 (M)) to Neighborhood Commercial 3 with a 75 foot height limit, P pedestrian designation, and M Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (NC3P 75 (M)) and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreements as a condition of rezone approval. (Application of Pacific Fishermen, Inc. C.F. 314470, SDCI Project 3037590-LU)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves applications for current use taxation of properties located 4200 Baker Avenue NW and 2317 S Norman Street under the King County….CB 120559 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves applications for current use taxation of properties located 4200 Baker Avenue NW and 2317 S Norman Street under the King County….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126809May 9, 2023
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to current use taxation; approving applications for current use taxation of properties located 4200 Baker Avenue NW and 2317 S Norman Street under the King County Public Benefit Rating System.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon The Fairfax, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and….CB 120554 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon The Fairfax, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126812May 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon The Fairfax, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the University of Washington Faculty Club, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….CB 120555 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the University of Washington Faculty Club, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126813May 17, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the University of Washington Faculty Club, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon Madison Middle School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 120563 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon Madison Middle School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126828June 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon Madison Middle School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon Magnolia Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 120564 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon Magnolia Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126829June 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon Magnolia Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon Daniel Bagley Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 120565 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon Daniel Bagley Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126830June 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon Daniel Bagley Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon West Seattle High School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 120566 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon West Seattle High School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126831June 1, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon West Seattle High School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Elephant Car Wash Sign, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….CB 120729 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentOrigin unclearHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredOrigin unclear

Imposes controls upon the Elephant Car Wash Sign, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126973December 28, 2023
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Elephant Car Wash Sign, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. explicit department field not parsed
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon La Quinta Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 120295 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon La Quinta Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126567May 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon La Quinta Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the University National Bank, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 120297 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the University National Bank, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126569May 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the University National Bank, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon El Monterey, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and….CB 120296 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon El Monterey, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126568May 2, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon El Monterey, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon The Center for Wooden Boats, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….CB 120310 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon The Center for Wooden Boats, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126575May 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon The Center for Wooden Boats, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Wagner Floating Home, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 120311 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Wagner Floating Home, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126576May 11, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Wagner Floating Home, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedDept. Contact/Phone: CBO Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Cayton-Revels House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 120336 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Cayton-Revels House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126603June 24, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Cayton-Revels House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Original Van Asselt School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….CB 120360 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Original Van Asselt School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126629July 27, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Original Van Asselt School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Loyal Heights Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….CB 120361 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Loyal Heights Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126630July 27, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Loyal Heights Elementary School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon Ingraham High School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 120362 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon Ingraham High School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126631July 27, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon Ingraham High School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests that the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Department of Transportation consider the proposed amendments as part of….Res 32068 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests that the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Department of Transportation consider the proposed amendments as part of….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 20, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments proposed to be considered for possible adoption in 2023; requesting that the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Department of Transportation consider the proposed amendments as part of the development of the One Seattle update to the Comprehensive Plan and the Seattle Transportation Plan.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 43 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the eastern thirty….CB 120428 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 43 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the eastern thirty….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126693October 18, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to land use and zoning; amending Chapter 23.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code at page 43 of the Official Land Use Map to rezone the eastern thirty feet of the parcel located at 1007 NE 71st Street from Lowrise 1 with an M1 Mandatory Housing Affordability suffix (LR1 (M1)) to Neighborhood Commercial 2-55 with an M2 Mandatory Housing Affordability Suffix (NC 2-55 (M2)) with the Roosevelt Station Area Overlay (RO) and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreements as a condition of rezone approval. (Application of Hugh Schaeffer, SHW, C.F. 314447, SDCI Project 3034865-LU)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Request that CBO's Innovation & Performance Team provide recommendations for a permanent home department for the City's parking enforcement unit.SLI CBO-320-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CBO's Innovation & Performance Team provide recommendations for a permanent home department for the City's parking enforcement unit.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO's Innovation & Performance Team provide recommendations for a permanent home department for the City's parking enforcement unit

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that DEEL provide draft legislation for Council consideration to prioritize enrollment in the Seattle Promise program.SLI DEEL-301-A-002-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DEEL provide draft legislation for Council consideration to prioritize enrollment in the Seattle Promise program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DEEL provide draft legislation for Council consideration to prioritize enrollment in the Seattle Promise program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that DEEL create a proposal for the use of all remaining Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy underspend through 2022 to….SLI DEEL-302-A-003-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DEEL create a proposal for the use of all remaining Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy underspend through 2022 to….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DEEL create a proposal for the use of all remaining Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy underspend through 2022 to go toward Early Learning and K-12 programs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request a pre-budget report from FAS and LAW on judgment and claims expenses.SLI FAS-303-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request a pre-budget report from FAS and LAW on judgment and claims expenses.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest a pre-budget report from FAS and LAW on judgment and claims expenses

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that HSD provide a report on contracting with human services providers.SLI HSD-300-A-002-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originHuman Services & Food Security Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD provide a report on contracting with human services providers.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Human Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD provide a report on contracting with human services providers

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OH review options for non-permanent supportive housing services funding and pre-development and/or organizational capacity funding in development of the proposed….SLI OH-300-A-002-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OH review options for non-permanent supportive housing services funding and pre-development and/or organizational capacity funding in development of the proposed….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Affordable HousingPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OH review options for non-permanent supportive housing services funding and pre-development and/or organizational capacity funding in development of the proposed housing levy renewal package

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OSE provide a report on Citywide funding for tree planting, stewardship, and other urban forestry-related activities.SLI OSE-301-A-002-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OSE provide a report on Citywide funding for tree planting, stewardship, and other urban forestry-related activities.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OSE provide a report on Citywide funding for tree planting, stewardship, and other urban forestry-related activities

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SCL report on new sources of green power.SLI SCL-301-A-002-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originElectricity Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SCL report on new sources of green power.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SCL report on new sources of green power

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDOT estimate the cost of manufacturing and installing historic street name signs.SLI SDOT-302-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT estimate the cost of manufacturing and installing historic street name signs.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT estimate the cost of manufacturing and installing historic street name signs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDOT provide recommendations on City and State parking rate policy.SLI SDOT-303-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT provide recommendations on City and State parking rate policy.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide recommendations on City and State parking rate policy

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDOT report on Downtown Seattle mobility needs.SLI SDOT-306-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT report on Downtown Seattle mobility needs.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on Downtown Seattle mobility needs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SFD report on staffing, overtime, finances, and performance metrics.SLI SFD-300-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SFD report on staffing, overtime, finances, and performance metrics.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SFD report on staffing, overtime, finances, and performance metrics

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on police staffing, overtime, finances and performance metrics.SLI SPD-301-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on police staffing, overtime, finances and performance metrics.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on police staffing, overtime, finances and performance metrics

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on Stage 2 of the Risk Management Demand (RMD) project.SLI SPD-302-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on Stage 2 of the Risk Management Demand (RMD) project.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on Stage 2 of the Risk Management Demand (RMD) project

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on emphasis patrols.SLI SPD-303-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on emphasis patrols.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on emphasis patrols

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SPR report on funding for an after-school program for resettled and immigrant children living in subsidized housing in Magnuson Park.SLI SPR-301-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originParks & RecreationYouth & EducationImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPR report on funding for an after-school program for resettled and immigrant children living in subsidized housing in Magnuson Park.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Parks & RecreationYouth & EducationImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPR report on funding for an after-school program for resettled and immigrant children living in subsidized housing in Magnuson Park

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPU support the Lake Washington sockeye salmon co-managers as they assess the ongoing feasibility of transporting sockeye salmon through the….SLI SPU-313-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPU support the Lake Washington sockeye salmon co-managers as they assess the ongoing feasibility of transporting sockeye salmon through the….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPU support the Lake Washington sockeye salmon co-managers as they assess the ongoing feasibility of transporting sockeye salmon through the Lake Washington Ship Canal, and provide a report describing those efforts

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that CBO report on use of 9-1-1 excise tax revenue.SLI CBO-600-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CBO report on use of 9-1-1 excise tax revenue.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO report on use of 9-1-1 excise tax revenue

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that CEN report on scope and funding for Memorial Stadium Redevelopment.SLI CEN-602-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CEN report on scope and funding for Memorial Stadium Redevelopment.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CEN report on scope and funding for Memorial Stadium Redevelopment

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that DEEL provide a report on all current and potential sources of funds for student mental health supports.SLI DEEL-602-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originBehavioral Health Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DEEL provide a report on all current and potential sources of funds for student mental health supports.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Behavioral Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DEEL provide a report on all current and potential sources of funds for student mental health supports

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that OED provide a report on the impacts of business technical assistance in high displacement risk neighborhoods.SLI OED-602-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-originNeighborhoods Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED provide a report on the impacts of business technical assistance in high displacement risk neighborhoods.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED provide a report on the impacts of business technical assistance in high displacement risk neighborhoods

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDCI report on a work program for regulatory changes for small landlords.SLI SDCI-601-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDCI report on a work program for regulatory changes for small landlords.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDCI report on a work program for regulatory changes for small landlords

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDCI promulgate a rule and report to the Council, or transmit legislation with regulatory changes to the Council, on proposed….SLI SDCI-602-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentSolid Waste Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDCI promulgate a rule and report to the Council, or transmit legislation with regulatory changes to the Council, on proposed….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentSolid Waste
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDCI promulgate a rule and report to the Council, or transmit legislation with regulatory changes to the Council, on proposed development standards for alleys, loading berths, and solid waste storage facilities

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT report on constituent issue tracking and response.SLI SDOT-301-B-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT report on constituent issue tracking and response.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on constituent issue tracking and response

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT address Council priorities in the development of the Seattle Transportation Plan.SLI SDOT-305-B-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT address Council priorities in the development of the Seattle Transportation Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT address Council priorities in the development of the Seattle Transportation Plan

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT provide a report on implementing the Ballard-Interbay Regional Transportation System improvements.SLI SDOT-607-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT provide a report on implementing the Ballard-Interbay Regional Transportation System improvements.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide a report on implementing the Ballard-Interbay Regional Transportation System improvements

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT report on sidewalk alternatives.SLI SDOT-610-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT report on sidewalk alternatives.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on sidewalk alternatives

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that the Mayor’s Office, with the collaboration of HSD, develop a plan to fund addiction treatment using proceeds from the State….SLI HSD-605-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the Mayor’s Office, with the collaboration of HSD, develop a plan to fund addiction treatment using proceeds from the State….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Mayor’s Office, with the collaboration of HSD, develop a plan to fund addiction treatment using proceeds from the State settlement against opioid medication distributors

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Instructing Office of Housing and Seattle Parks and Recreation to report to Council on a plan to use the property known as….SLI OH-601-B-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingParks & Recreation Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Instructing Office of Housing and Seattle Parks and Recreation to report to Council on a plan to use the property known as….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Affordable HousingParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleInstructing Office of Housing and Seattle Parks and Recreation to report to Council on a plan to use the property known as the “Belltown Cottages” for low-income housing

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Imposes controls upon the Swedish Club, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 120021 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Swedish Club, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126303April 2, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Swedish Club, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Supports the Uptown neighborhood and requesting that City departments and other parties use the correct name for Uptown.Res 32001 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-originNeighborhoods Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Supports the Uptown neighborhood and requesting that City departments and other parties use the correct name for Uptown.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 12, 2021
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Neighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION supporting the Uptown neighborhood and requesting that City departments and other parties use the correct name for Uptown.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Bordeaux House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 120106 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Bordeaux House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126381July 6, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Bordeaux House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of two parcels in South Park for the purpose of development of affordable housing and community ground floor space.CB 120114 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of two parcels in South Park for the purpose of development of affordable housing and community ground floor space.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126389July 14, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Office of Housing; authorizing the acquisition of two parcels in South Park for the purpose of development of affordable housing and community ground floor space; placing the property under the jurisdiction of the Office of Housing; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $3,650,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2022 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community….Res 32010 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2022 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 2, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2022 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Planning Commission review and make recommendations about proposed amendments.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating the alley in Block 21, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition, bounded by Bell Street, 7th Avenue, Blanchard Street, and….CB 120136 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating the alley in Block 21, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition, bounded by Bell Street, 7th Avenue, Blanchard Street, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126408August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the alley in Block 21, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition, bounded by Bell Street, 7th Avenue, Blanchard Street, and 8th Avenue, in South Lake Union; and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement, on the petition of Acorn Development LLC (Clerk File 314278).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,180,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating the alley in Block 20, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition, bounded by 7th Avenue, Blanchard Street, 8th Avenue, and….CB 120137 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating the alley in Block 20, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition, bounded by 7th Avenue, Blanchard Street, 8th Avenue, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126416August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the alley in Block 20, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition, bounded by 7th Avenue, Blanchard Street, 8th Avenue, and Lenora Street, in South Lake Union; and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement, on the petition of Acorn Development LLC (Clerk File 312262).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,188,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Request that CBO develop models, costs, and timelines for citywide 24/7 mental/behavioral health response.SLI CBO-002-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originBehavioral Health Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CBO develop models, costs, and timelines for citywide 24/7 mental/behavioral health response.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Behavioral Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO develop models, costs, and timelines for citywide 24/7 mental/behavioral health response

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that CBO report on a citywide hiring incentive program.SLI CBO-013-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CBO report on a citywide hiring incentive program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO report on a citywide hiring incentive program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that DON provide recommendations on opportunities for a more equitable economy and community wealth building.SLI DON-002-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DON provide recommendations on opportunities for a more equitable economy and community wealth building.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DON provide recommendations on opportunities for a more equitable economy and community wealth building

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that FAS report on increased efficiencies in animal control patrolling.SLI FAS-003-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that FAS report on increased efficiencies in animal control patrolling.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that FAS report on increased efficiencies in animal control patrolling

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that the Executive provide recommendations and draft amendments to the City’s short-term rental ordinance.SLI FAS-004-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the Executive provide recommendations and draft amendments to the City’s short-term rental ordinance.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Executive provide recommendations and draft amendments to the City’s short-term rental ordinance

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Express City Council's commitment to work with the Mayor to identify options for making Seattle’s tax structure more equitable and generating new….SLI FG-002-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Express City Council's commitment to work with the Mayor to identify options for making Seattle’s tax structure more equitable and generating new….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleExpress City Council's commitment to work with the Mayor to identify options for making Seattle’s tax structure more equitable and generating new revenue for city priorities including the Equitable Community Initiative, Participatory Budgeting, and community safety investments in 2023 and beyond

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request a report from the King County Regional Housing Authority analyzing the theory and process to integrate the homelessness services system and….SLI HOM-010-C-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request a report from the King County Regional Housing Authority analyzing the theory and process to integrate the homelessness services system and….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest a report from the King County Regional Housing Authority analyzing the theory and process to integrate the homelessness services system and how peer navigators have been incorporated into homelessness outreach

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that HSD contract with a Native-led organization to provide services to the American Indian/Alaska Native community.SLI HSD-003-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD contract with a Native-led organization to provide services to the American Indian/Alaska Native community.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD contract with a Native-led organization to provide services to the American Indian/Alaska Native community

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that HSD report on availability of state and federal funding for food programs.SLI HSD-026-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD report on availability of state and federal funding for food programs.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD report on availability of state and federal funding for food programs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that CBO report on Internet for All in 2022 Adopted Budget and future proposed budgets.SLI ITD-003-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CBO report on Internet for All in 2022 Adopted Budget and future proposed budgets.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO report on Internet for All in 2022 Adopted Budget and future proposed budgets

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that LAW work with HSD to plan for transfer of community-based diversion contracts.SLI LAW-003-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that LAW work with HSD to plan for transfer of community-based diversion contracts.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that LAW work with HSD to plan for transfer of community-based diversion contracts

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that OED provide recommendations to support establishment of an indigenous pharmacy or market.SLI OED-007-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED provide recommendations to support establishment of an indigenous pharmacy or market.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED provide recommendations to support establishment of an indigenous pharmacy or market

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OED develop a construction impacts mitigation program for small businesses.SLI OED-009-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED develop a construction impacts mitigation program for small businesses.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED develop a construction impacts mitigation program for small businesses

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OED, OH, and OPCD develop a plan to coordinate community investments.SLI OED-011-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED, OH, and OPCD develop a plan to coordinate community investments.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED, OH, and OPCD develop a plan to coordinate community investments

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request OH to report on services funding for non-permanent supportive housing providers.SLI OH-005-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request OH to report on services funding for non-permanent supportive housing providers.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest OH to report on services funding for non-permanent supportive housing providers

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that funding decisions for OH's Fall 2021 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) recognize 2022 affordable housing appropriations and request that OH….SLI OH-010-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable Housing Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that funding decisions for OH's Fall 2021 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) recognize 2022 affordable housing appropriations and request that OH….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Affordable Housing
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that funding decisions for OH's Fall 2021 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) recognize 2022 affordable housing appropriations and request that OH recommend modifications to the Housing Funding Policies

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OH and SMC work with the King County Regional Homelessness Authority and Seattle Housing Authority to report on prioritizing housing….SLI OH-013-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OH and SMC work with the King County Regional Homelessness Authority and Seattle Housing Authority to report on prioritizing housing….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OH and SMC work with the King County Regional Homelessness Authority and Seattle Housing Authority to report on prioritizing housing vouchers for individuals involved in the criminal legal system

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OH encourage the distribution of rental assistance through food banks and helplines.SLI OH-014-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OH encourage the distribution of rental assistance through food banks and helplines.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OH encourage the distribution of rental assistance through food banks and helplines

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OPCD prepare a work program and budget for Regional Growth Centers Planning.SLI OPCD-004-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OPCD prepare a work program and budget for Regional Growth Centers Planning.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OPCD prepare a work program and budget for Regional Growth Centers Planning

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OPCD report on options for Stone Avenue North.SLI OPCD-005-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OPCD report on options for Stone Avenue North.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OPCD report on options for Stone Avenue North

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OPCD report on opportunities to support Community Investment Trusts.SLI OPCD-009-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OPCD report on opportunities to support Community Investment Trusts.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OPCD report on opportunities to support Community Investment Trusts

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that Seattle City Light (SCL) report on pole replacement and office space projects.SLI SCL-002-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originElectricity Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that Seattle City Light (SCL) report on pole replacement and office space projects.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that Seattle City Light (SCL) report on pole replacement and office space projects

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDCI report on Design Review program outcomes, process improvements, and equity.SLI SDCI-004-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDCI report on Design Review program outcomes, process improvements, and equity.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDCI report on Design Review program outcomes, process improvements, and equity

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDCI convene a small landlord and tenant stakeholder group.SLI SDCI-009-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDCI convene a small landlord and tenant stakeholder group.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDCI convene a small landlord and tenant stakeholder group

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDOT report on pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements to MLK Jr Way S.SLI SDOT-006-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & SidewalksTraffic Safety Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT report on pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements to MLK Jr Way S.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Streets & SidewalksTraffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements to MLK Jr Way S

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDOT report on the impact of over-weight vehicles.SLI SDOT-009-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT report on the impact of over-weight vehicles.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on the impact of over-weight vehicles

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT report on traffic safety analysis and incident reporting.SLI SDOT-010-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTraffic Safety Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT report on traffic safety analysis and incident reporting.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Traffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on traffic safety analysis and incident reporting

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDOT provide monthly reporting on the West Seattle Bridge Immediate Response program.SLI SDOT-011-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originBridges & Structures Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT provide monthly reporting on the West Seattle Bridge Immediate Response program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Bridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide monthly reporting on the West Seattle Bridge Immediate Response program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SFD report on its work and costs to launch the Triage One program.SLI SFD-004-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SFD report on its work and costs to launch the Triage One program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SFD report on its work and costs to launch the Triage One program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SMC report on all fees and fines imposed on a court-involved individual and analyze associated disproportionality.SLI SMC-001-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SMC report on all fees and fines imposed on a court-involved individual and analyze associated disproportionality.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SMC report on all fees and fines imposed on a court-involved individual and analyze associated disproportionality

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on National Institute for Criminal Justice Reform report recommendations.SLI SPD-017-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on National Institute for Criminal Justice Reform report recommendations.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on National Institute for Criminal Justice Reform report recommendations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SPD report on the specific activities of the officers that serve on a number of inter-jurisdictional task forces.SLI SPD-018-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on the specific activities of the officers that serve on a number of inter-jurisdictional task forces.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on the specific activities of the officers that serve on a number of inter-jurisdictional task forces

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SPR report on potential expansion of Seattle Conservation Corps.SLI SPR-012-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPR report on potential expansion of Seattle Conservation Corps.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPR report on potential expansion of Seattle Conservation Corps

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SPU perform an assessment of potential drainage improvements for Phinney Avenue North.SLI SPU-004-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originWater & Wastewater Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPU perform an assessment of potential drainage improvements for Phinney Avenue North.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Water & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPU perform an assessment of potential drainage improvements for Phinney Avenue North

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that the City Budget Office (CBO) report on the Community Service Officer (CSO) program.SLI CBO-001-A-001-2022 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the City Budget Office (CBO) report on the Community Service Officer (CSO) program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the City Budget Office (CBO) report on the Community Service Officer (CSO) program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that MO provide recommendations regarding creating a chief arborist position.SLI MO-001-A-002-2022 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that MO provide recommendations regarding creating a chief arborist position.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that MO provide recommendations regarding creating a chief arborist position

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on police staffing, overtime, finances and performance metrics.SLI SPD-001-A-001-2022 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on police staffing, overtime, finances and performance metrics.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on police staffing, overtime, finances and performance metrics

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on its data collection and management practices for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG) cases.SLI SPD-002-A-001-2022 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originPoliceImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on its data collection and management practices for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG) cases.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
PoliceImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on its data collection and management practices for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG) cases

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Imposes controls upon 802 16th Avenue, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 120235 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon 802 16th Avenue, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126510December 15, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon 802 16th Avenue, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming The City of Seattle’s support for its local Iranian-American and Iranian-immigrant communities, recognizing the importance of people-to-people diplomacy at the local….Res 31925 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Affirming The City of Seattle’s support for its local Iranian-American and Iranian-immigrant communities, recognizing the importance of people-to-people diplomacy at the local….

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 21, 2020
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming The City of Seattle’s support for its local Iranian-American and Iranian-immigrant communities, recognizing the importance of people-to-people diplomacy at the local level, calling for a de-escalation in the conflict and damaging rhetoric between the U.S. and Iran and an end to the attacks on the democratic rights of people with Iranian heritage in Washington State and requesting the Office of Intergovernmental Relations communicate these positions to the Washington State congressional delegation.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Reaffirming Seattle as a welcoming city and condemning all forms of oppression throughout the world.Res 31928 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Reaffirming Seattle as a welcoming city and condemning all forms of oppression throughout the world.

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 27, 2020
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote4 in favor · 1 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming Seattle as a welcoming city and condemning all forms of oppression throughout the world.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote4 in favor · 1 opposed
Reaffirming Seattle as a welcoming city, expressing the Seattle City Council’s solidarity with Seattle’s South Asian community regardless of religion and caste….Res 31926 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Reaffirming Seattle as a welcoming city, expressing the Seattle City Council’s solidarity with Seattle’s South Asian community regardless of religion and caste….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 3, 2020
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming Seattle as a welcoming city, expressing the Seattle City Council’s solidarity with Seattle’s South Asian community regardless of religion and caste, and opposing India’s National Register of Citizens and Citizenship Amendment Act.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Imposes controls upon the University of Washington Eagleson Hall, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….CB 119749 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the University of Washington Eagleson Hall, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126050March 5, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the University of Washington Eagleson Hall, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Exchange, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….CB 119748 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Exchange, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126051March 5, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Exchange, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acquisition of real property being identified in King County Records as Parcels AA, BB, CC, and DD of City of….CB 119781 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acquisition of real property being identified in King County Records as Parcels AA, BB, CC, and DD of City of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126078May 6, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentCity Propertyfiscal band inferred from action type
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Department of Finance and Administrative Services; authorizing the acquisition of real property being identified in King County Records as Parcels AA, BB, CC, and DD of City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 3025019, and Parcel Y of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3026183; authorizing acceptance and recording of deeds for general municipal purposes including, but not limited to, the construction of Fire Station 31; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the action authorizes a transaction or program with a material but unparsed amount. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the response to the Covid-19 public health emergency.Res 31946 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originPublic Health Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Related to the response to the Covid-19 public health emergency.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 26, 2020
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Public Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION related to the response to the Covid-19 public health emergency; requesting that Governor Inslee create a "Washington Worker Relief Fund" to provide economic assistance to undocumented Washingtonians during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,020. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Reaffirming The City of Seattle’s support of unbanked money transfer operators and the immigrant communities they serve.Res 31955 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Reaffirming The City of Seattle’s support of unbanked money transfer operators and the immigrant communities they serve.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 14, 2020
Official sponsorsTammy J. Morales
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming The City of Seattle’s support of unbanked money transfer operators and the immigrant communities they serve.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the rights of members of the press, legal observers, and medical personnel covering the protests against police brutality.Res 31961 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Affirming the rights of members of the press, legal observers, and medical personnel covering the protests against police brutality.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 10, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Alex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming the rights of members of the press, legal observers, and medical personnel covering the protests against police brutality.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants SMRE Marketside LLC permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across Post Alley at the north margin of….CB 119846 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants SMRE Marketside LLC permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across Post Alley at the north margin of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126136August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting SMRE Marketside LLC permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across Post Alley at the north margin of Union Street for a fifteen-year term, renewable for one successive fifteen-year term; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $1,110,377. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Canterbury Court, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 119847 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originCourts & Legal EnforcementHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Canterbury Court, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126145August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Courts & Legal EnforcementHistoric Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Canterbury Court, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Roy Vue Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 119849 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Roy Vue Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126146August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Roy Vue Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the University of Washington Engineering Annex, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….CB 119848 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the University of Washington Engineering Annex, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126153August 23, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the University of Washington Engineering Annex, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants the University of Washington (UW) permission to maintain and operate five existing pedestrian skybridges located around the perimeter of the UW….CB 119745 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants the University of Washington (UW) permission to maintain and operate five existing pedestrian skybridges located around the perimeter of the UW….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126158September 11, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting the University of Washington (UW) permission to maintain and operate five existing pedestrian skybridges located around the perimeter of the UW campus as a Campus Pedestrian Skybridge Network, for a ten-year term; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $36,816. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Villa Camini, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 119889 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Villa Camini, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126171September 25, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Villa Camini, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2021 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community….Res 31970 · Resolution (Res) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2021 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 29, 2020
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2021 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Planning Commission review and make recommendations about proposed amendments.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Updates the City Light Department.CB 119902 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityCity Property Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Updates the City Light Department.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126192October 8, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; amending Section 21.49.090 of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify the Department’s discretion to allow additional services on a parcel as it deems necessary to provide adequate service to customers.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Request a new Internet for All section in the 2021 Adopted Budget Book.SLI CBO-001-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request a new Internet for All section in the 2021 Adopted Budget Book.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 28, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest a new Internet for All section in the 2021 Adopted Budget Book

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request a new Internet for All section in the 2021 Adopted Budget Book.SLI CBO-001-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request a new Internet for All section in the 2021 Adopted Budget Book.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest a new Internet for All section in the 2021 Adopted Budget Book

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that FAS report on potential space for a food bank in Belltown.SLI FAS-001-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that FAS report on potential space for a food bank in Belltown.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that FAS report on potential space for a food bank in Belltown

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that FAS provide a report on small business Business and Occupation tax relief options.SLI FAS-002-B-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-originSmall BusinessTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that FAS provide a report on small business Business and Occupation tax relief options.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Small BusinessTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that FAS provide a report on small business Business and Occupation tax relief options

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that HSD carry forward unspent funding for senior congregate meal programs to 2021.SLI HSD-002-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD carry forward unspent funding for senior congregate meal programs to 2021.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD carry forward unspent funding for senior congregate meal programs to 2021

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that HSD provide a report on demand and costs for citywide diversion program by August 2, 2021.SLI HSD-006-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD provide a report on demand and costs for citywide diversion program by August 2, 2021.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD provide a report on demand and costs for citywide diversion program by August 2, 2021

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that the Executive recommend strategies for consolidating urban forestry functions.SLI MO-001-A-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the Executive recommend strategies for consolidating urban forestry functions.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Executive recommend strategies for consolidating urban forestry functions

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that the Executive participate in a work group regarding implementation of the 2019 Racial Equity Toolkit (RET) report.SLI OCR-002-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the Executive participate in a work group regarding implementation of the 2019 Racial Equity Toolkit (RET) report.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Executive participate in a work group regarding implementation of the 2019 Racial Equity Toolkit (RET) report

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OED develop strategies to support farmers markets.SLI OED-002-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED develop strategies to support farmers markets.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED develop strategies to support farmers markets

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OED develop a construction impacts mitigation program for small businesses.SLI OED-004-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED develop a construction impacts mitigation program for small businesses.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED develop a construction impacts mitigation program for small businesses

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report by OPCD, OH, and SDCI on displacement monitoring gaps.SLI OPCD-004-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by OPCD, OH, and SDCI on displacement monitoring gaps.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by OPCD, OH, and SDCI on displacement monitoring gaps

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SCERS provide a report on sources and uses of City retirement funds and performance of the SCERS II plan.SLI RET-001-B-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SCERS provide a report on sources and uses of City retirement funds and performance of the SCERS II plan.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SCERS provide a report on sources and uses of City retirement funds and performance of the SCERS II plan

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report by SDCI on permit processing times.SLI SDCI-003-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by SDCI on permit processing times.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by SDCI on permit processing times

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report by SDCI on transferable rental histories.SLI SDCI-005-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by SDCI on transferable rental histories.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by SDCI on transferable rental histories

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report by SDCI on standard residential lease terms.SLI SDCI-006-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by SDCI on standard residential lease terms.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by SDCI on standard residential lease terms

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report by SDCI and OH on Mandatory Housing Affordability Program production.SLI SDCI-010-B-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by SDCI and OH on Mandatory Housing Affordability Program production.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by SDCI and OH on Mandatory Housing Affordability Program production

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDOT provide monthly reporting on the West Seattle Bridge Immediate Response program consistent with the July 16, 2020 Mayoral Proclamation….SLI SDOT-009-B-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originBridges & Structures Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT provide monthly reporting on the West Seattle Bridge Immediate Response program consistent with the July 16, 2020 Mayoral Proclamation….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Bridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide monthly reporting on the West Seattle Bridge Immediate Response program consistent with the July 16, 2020 Mayoral Proclamation of Civil Emergency

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPD to provide the reports requested in Ordinance 126148 and Resolution 31962.SLI SPD-001-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPD to provide the reports requested in Ordinance 126148 and Resolution 31962.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPD to provide the reports requested in Ordinance 126148 and Resolution 31962

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPD to provide reports on its overtime use.SLI SPD-002-B-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPD to provide reports on its overtime use.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPD to provide reports on its overtime use

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPD to provide monthly reports on police staffing.SLI SPD-003-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPD to provide monthly reports on police staffing.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPD to provide monthly reports on police staffing

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPD to report on traffic stops.SLI SPD-004-B-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPD to report on traffic stops.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPD to report on traffic stops

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPD to report on cost effectiveness of using Parking Enforcement Officers for special events, contracted sporting events, and flagging.SLI SPD-005-B-002 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPD to report on cost effectiveness of using Parking Enforcement Officers for special events, contracted sporting events, and flagging.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPD to report on cost effectiveness of using Parking Enforcement Officers for special events, contracted sporting events, and flagging

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPD to report on 911 call response times.SLI SPD-006-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPD to report on 911 call response times.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPD to report on 911 call response times

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPD to report on policies that would de-militarize officer tactics, equipment and culture.SLI SPD-021-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPoliceArts & Culture Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPD to report on policies that would de-militarize officer tactics, equipment and culture.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
PoliceArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPD to report on policies that would de-militarize officer tactics, equipment and culture

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request report on potential economies of scale for 911 dispatch.SLI SPD-503-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request report on potential economies of scale for 911 dispatch.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest report on potential economies of scale for 911 dispatch

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPL open curbside pickup and return at all branches or in-branch service at 25% capacity.SLI SPL-001-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPL open curbside pickup and return at all branches or in-branch service at 25% capacity.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPL open curbside pickup and return at all branches or in-branch service at 25% capacity

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPR to design and place signage at Licton Springs.SLI SPR-005-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPR to design and place signage at Licton Springs.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPR to design and place signage at Licton Springs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPU to prepare a scope of work to analyze wastewater treatment plans and potential governance structure changes.SLI SPU-001-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originWater & WastewaterGovernment Accountability Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPU to prepare a scope of work to analyze wastewater treatment plans and potential governance structure changes.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Water & WastewaterGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPU to prepare a scope of work to analyze wastewater treatment plans and potential governance structure changes

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SPU to explore an expansion of the Tree Ambassador program.SLI SPU-002-A-003 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2020 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originTrees & Habitat Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SPU to explore an expansion of the Tree Ambassador program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2020
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Trees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SPU to explore an expansion of the Tree Ambassador program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Imposes controls upon the Broad Street Substation, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 119467 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Broad Street Substation, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125783March 8, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Broad Street Substation, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants KR Westlake, LLC, permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge over the alley in the block bordered by Westlake Avenue….CB 119520 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants KR Westlake, LLC, permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge over the alley in the block bordered by Westlake Avenue….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125824June 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting KR Westlake, LLC, permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge over the alley in the block bordered by Westlake Avenue North, Terry Avenue North, Thomas Street, and Harrison Street, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; amending Ordinance 122239; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $74,189. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to fostering a welcoming community that protects all its residents and declaring its support for providing….Res 31890 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originYouth & EducationImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to fostering a welcoming community that protects all its residents and declaring its support for providing….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & EducationImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to fostering a welcoming community that protects all its residents and declaring its support for providing permanent protection and a path to citizenship for immigrant youth and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) recipients for whom the United States is home.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Imposes controls upon the Seattle Tower, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 119528 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Seattle Tower, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125836June 17, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Seattle Tower, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Mount Baker Community Club Clubhouse, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….CB 119529 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Mount Baker Community Club Clubhouse, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125837June 17, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Mount Baker Community Club Clubhouse, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the University of Washington Parrington Hall, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….CB 119530 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the University of Washington Parrington Hall, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125838June 17, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the University of Washington Parrington Hall, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Ainsworth & Dunn Warehouse, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….CB 119540 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Ainsworth & Dunn Warehouse, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125853July 9, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Ainsworth & Dunn Warehouse, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2020 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community….Res 31896 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2020 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 12, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2020 and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Planning Commission review and make recommendations about the proposed amendments.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests that the Mayor commit to building out the Bicycle Master Plan and identify funding for priority Bicycle Master Plan projects in….Res 31894 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTraffic SafetyBudget & Appropriations Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests that the Mayor commit to building out the Bicycle Master Plan and identify funding for priority Bicycle Master Plan projects in….

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 3, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic SafetyBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION relating to the funding of priority projects in the 2019-2024 Bicycle Master Plan Implementation Plan; requesting that the Mayor commit to building out the Bicycle Master Plan and identify funding for priority Bicycle Master Plan projects in the Mayor’s 2020 Proposed Budget.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests that the Seattle Department of Transportation develop a budget proposal for creating on-street bike and e-scooter parking.Res 31898 · Resolution (Res) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTraffic SafetyBudget & Appropriations Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests that the Seattle Department of Transportation develop a budget proposal for creating on-street bike and e-scooter parking.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 3, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Traffic SafetyBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting that the Seattle Department of Transportation develop a budget proposal for creating on-street bike and e-scooter parking.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Request that DEEL report on data collection, disaggregation, and usage.SLI DEEL-10-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DEEL report on data collection, disaggregation, and usage.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DEEL report on data collection, disaggregation, and usage

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request SCL to report on electrification of all transportation and buildings.SLI SCL-1-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SCL to report on electrification of all transportation and buildings.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SCL to report on electrification of all transportation and buildings

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that OPCD and SDCI prepare a proposal to limit siting of new fossil fuel production and storage facilities.SLI SDCI-3-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OPCD and SDCI prepare a proposal to limit siting of new fossil fuel production and storage facilities.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OPCD and SDCI prepare a proposal to limit siting of new fossil fuel production and storage facilities

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT develop a plan to make all public transit in Seattle free to ride.SLI SDOT-15-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT develop a plan to make all public transit in Seattle free to ride.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT develop a plan to make all public transit in Seattle free to ride

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that CBO develop a proposal for a compensation program for Boards and Commissions volunteers.SLI CBO-3-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originCompensation & Benefits Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CBO develop a proposal for a compensation program for Boards and Commissions volunteers.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Compensation & Benefits
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO develop a proposal for a compensation program for Boards and Commissions volunteers

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request a report from CBO on the use and contracted cost of beds at the King County Jail and options for distribution….SLI CBO-4-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request a report from CBO on the use and contracted cost of beds at the King County Jail and options for distribution….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest a report from CBO on the use and contracted cost of beds at the King County Jail and options for distribution of services inside the King County Jail

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OCR spend a portion of its $1 million in its 2020 Proposed Budget on community-based organizations to create restorative justice….SLI CJ-6-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OCR spend a portion of its $1 million in its 2020 Proposed Budget on community-based organizations to create restorative justice….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OCR spend a portion of its $1 million in its 2020 Proposed Budget on community-based organizations to create restorative justice approaches to individuals committing hate crimes

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that Seattle Municipal Court report back to Council on how it would implement high-barrier probation.SLI CJ-7-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that Seattle Municipal Court report back to Council on how it would implement high-barrier probation.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that Seattle Municipal Court report back to Council on how it would implement high-barrier probation

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that Executive departments report on reentry recommendations regarding increasing economic opportunities.SLI CJ-21-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that Executive departments report on reentry recommendations regarding increasing economic opportunities.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that Executive departments report on reentry recommendations regarding increasing economic opportunities

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that LAW report on expanding prefiling diversion opportunities to those over age 25.SLI CJ-24-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that LAW report on expanding prefiling diversion opportunities to those over age 25.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that LAW report on expanding prefiling diversion opportunities to those over age 25

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD develop a reporting mechanism that accurately captures race data.SLI CJ-26-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD develop a reporting mechanism that accurately captures race data.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD develop a reporting mechanism that accurately captures race data

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that DEEL conduct stakeholder engagement and report on including labor harmony language in Child Care Assistance Program contracts.SLI DEEL-1-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DEEL conduct stakeholder engagement and report on including labor harmony language in Child Care Assistance Program contracts.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DEEL conduct stakeholder engagement and report on including labor harmony language in Child Care Assistance Program contracts

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that DON report on long-term funding opportunities to preserve and enhance P-Patches.SLI DON-4-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DON report on long-term funding opportunities to preserve and enhance P-Patches.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DON report on long-term funding opportunities to preserve and enhance P-Patches

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request FAS to report on adding questions to Title 6 business license applications.SLI FAS-5-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request FAS to report on adding questions to Title 6 business license applications.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest FAS to report on adding questions to Title 6 business license applications

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request a report on sites for a tiny home village.SLI HOM-4-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request a report on sites for a tiny home village.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest a report on sites for a tiny home village

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that HSD report on contracts with American Indian and Alaska Native organizations.SLI HSD-1-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD report on contracts with American Indian and Alaska Native organizations.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD report on contracts with American Indian and Alaska Native organizations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request a report from HSD on subsidizing transit passes for employees of HSD contracted service providers.SLI HSD-5-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request a report from HSD on subsidizing transit passes for employees of HSD contracted service providers.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest a report from HSD on subsidizing transit passes for employees of HSD contracted service providers

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OED create strategies to connect developers with small businesses and service providers.SLI OED-2-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED create strategies to connect developers with small businesses and service providers.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED create strategies to connect developers with small businesses and service providers

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OED provide recommendations regarding the creation of a film commission.SLI OED-10-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED provide recommendations regarding the creation of a film commission.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED provide recommendations regarding the creation of a film commission

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OSE establish high-road contracting standards for electrical contractors.SLI OSE-3-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OSE establish high-road contracting standards for electrical contractors.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OSE establish high-road contracting standards for electrical contractors

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request SCL to report on SCL Strategic Planning in accordance with Seattle's Green New Deal Resolution (RES 31895).SLI SCL-2-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request SCL to report on SCL Strategic Planning in accordance with Seattle's Green New Deal Resolution (RES 31895).

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest SCL to report on SCL Strategic Planning in accordance with Seattle's Green New Deal Resolution (RES 31895)

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDOT provide a Center City Streetcar Connector Financial Plan.SLI SDOT-8-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT provide a Center City Streetcar Connector Financial Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT provide a Center City Streetcar Connector Financial Plan

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SPD, in conjunction with other City departments, lead an examination of the Charge By Officer (CBO) program.SLI SPD-1-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD, in conjunction with other City departments, lead an examination of the Charge By Officer (CBO) program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsAbel Pacheco
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD, in conjunction with other City departments, lead an examination of the Charge By Officer (CBO) program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Progress report from SPR on Green Seattle Partnership Program.SLI SPR-6-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Progress report from SPR on Green Seattle Partnership Program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleProgress report from SPR on Green Seattle Partnership Program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that OED form a search committee to provide recommendations for hiring a Creative Industry Director.SLI OED-15-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-originArts & Culture Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OED form a search committee to provide recommendations for hiring a Creative Industry Director.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OED form a search committee to provide recommendations for hiring a Creative Industry Director

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that DEEL assess the feasibility of implementing the Washington State Opportunity Scholarship program in Seattle and report on progress.SLI DEEL-8-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DEEL assess the feasibility of implementing the Washington State Opportunity Scholarship program in Seattle and report on progress.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DEEL assess the feasibility of implementing the Washington State Opportunity Scholarship program in Seattle and report on progress

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that DON report on a strategy to develop a community-led place-based violence prevention initiative in Westwood and South Delridge.SLI DON-5-B-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DON report on a strategy to develop a community-led place-based violence prevention initiative in Westwood and South Delridge.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DON report on a strategy to develop a community-led place-based violence prevention initiative in Westwood and South Delridge

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request a report on the Samaritan program's impacts on HSD contractees.SLI HOM-12-C-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request a report on the Samaritan program's impacts on HSD contractees.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest a report on the Samaritan program's impacts on HSD contractees

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request improvements to Utility Discount Program intake process.SLI HSD-20-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request improvements to Utility Discount Program intake process.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest improvements to Utility Discount Program intake process

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT report on current maintenance spending for bicycle infrastructure.SLI SDOT-2-C-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTraffic Safety Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT report on current maintenance spending for bicycle infrastructure.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Traffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT report on current maintenance spending for bicycle infrastructure

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on a City-wide asset loss approach.SLI SPD-9-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on a City-wide asset loss approach.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on a City-wide asset loss approach

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on compliance with copper wire laws.SLI SPD-10-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on compliance with copper wire laws.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on compliance with copper wire laws

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on the Community Service Officer program.SLI SPD-11-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on the Community Service Officer program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on the Community Service Officer program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on the Hiring and Retention initiative.SLI SPD-12-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on the Hiring and Retention initiative.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on the Hiring and Retention initiative

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SPD report on sworn staff hiring.SLI SPD-13-A-2 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on sworn staff hiring.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on sworn staff hiring

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request the City Auditor conduct a review of Seattle Municipal Court's probation program.SLI CJ-1-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originCourts & Legal Enforcement Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request the City Auditor conduct a review of Seattle Municipal Court's probation program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Courts & Legal Enforcement
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest the City Auditor conduct a review of Seattle Municipal Court's probation program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Addresses budget action CBO-900-A-1.SLI CBO-900-A-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Addresses budget action CBO-900-A-1.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleCBO-900-A-1

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Imposes controls upon the Highland Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 119627 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Highland Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126016December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Highland Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Bleitz Funeral Home, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 119630 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Bleitz Funeral Home, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126017December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Bleitz Funeral Home, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to racial equity and social justice and recognizing the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Transportation Equity Program….Res 31773 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesYouth & EducationAccessibility Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to racial equity and social justice and recognizing the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Transportation Equity Program….

OutcomeAdoptedJanuary 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesYouth & EducationAccessibility
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming The City of Seattle’s commitment to racial equity and social justice and recognizing the Seattle Department of Transportation’s Transportation Equity Program, created to provide safe, environmentally sustainable, accessible, and affordable transportation options that support communities of color, low-income communities, immigrant and refugee communities, people with disabilities, people experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity, LGTBQ people, women and girls, youth, and seniors to thrive in place in vibrant and healthy communities, and eliminate or mitigate racial disparities and the effects of displacement.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Pacific Architect & Builder Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….CB 119182 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Pacific Architect & Builder Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125523February 1, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Pacific Architect & Builder Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming The City of Seattle’s support of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School students’ demand for gun reform in the wake of the….Res 31803 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Affirming The City of Seattle’s support of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School students’ demand for gun reform in the wake of the….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 16, 2018
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming The City of Seattle’s support of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School students’ demand for gun reform in the wake of the February 14, 2018, Parkland, Florida, massacre that resulted in the death of 17 children and teachers.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Mount Zion Baptist Church, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….CB 119261 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Mount Zion Baptist Church, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125591June 6, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Mount Zion Baptist Church, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the human right to family unity and expressing opposition to the Trump Administration’s practices separating and/or detaining migrant families seeking asylum….Res 31822 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Affirming the human right to family unity and expressing opposition to the Trump Administration’s practices separating and/or detaining migrant families seeking asylum….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 29, 2018
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming the human right to family unity and expressing opposition to the Trump Administration’s practices separating and/or detaining migrant families seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border, and strong concern about the Trump Administration’s lack of family reunification plans for over 2,300 children and their parents or guardians and ongoing detention camps at the U.S.-Mexico border in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the applicable international human rights framework.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Shannon & Wilson Office Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….CB 119282 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Shannon & Wilson Office Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125623July 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Shannon & Wilson Office Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Eldridge Tire Company Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….CB 119283 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Eldridge Tire Company Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125624July 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Eldridge Tire Company Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests that the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, the Seattle Fire Department, and the City Budget Office include in the City’s….Res 31831 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originFire & EMSCompensation & BenefitsBudget & Appropriations Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests that the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, the Seattle Fire Department, and the City Budget Office include in the City’s….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 13, 2018
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Fire & EMSCompensation & BenefitsBudget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting that the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, the Seattle Fire Department, and the City Budget Office include in the City’s contract for Basic Life Support Emergency Services provisions that provide to emergency medical technicians (EMTs) a prevailing wage and benefits comparable to other emergency workers employed in comparable cities and similar sectors in the City of Seattle; and requesting the departments to provide additional analysis, data, and information.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLeg. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Bressi Garage, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 119318 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Bressi Garage, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125643August 17, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Bressi Garage, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Imposes controls upon the Century 21 Coliseum/KeyArena, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 119317 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Century 21 Coliseum/KeyArena, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125642August 17, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Century 21 Coliseum/KeyArena, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Reaffirming City Council’s commitment to workers and supporting dairy workers and their Fast for Reconciliation.Res 31838 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Reaffirming City Council’s commitment to workers and supporting dairy workers and their Fast for Reconciliation.

OutcomeAdoptedSeptember 17, 2018
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming City Council’s commitment to workers and supporting dairy workers and their Fast for Reconciliation.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,018. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Colonnade Hotel/Gatewood Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 119325 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Colonnade Hotel/Gatewood Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125673October 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Colonnade Hotel/Gatewood Apartments, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon Anhalt Hall, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and….CB 119348 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon Anhalt Hall, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125674October 5, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon Anhalt Hall, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Recommendations by OH for expansion of the Home Repair Loan Program.SLI 24-3-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Recommendations by OH for expansion of the Home Repair Loan Program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRecommendations by OH for expansion of the Home Repair Loan Program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that FAS submit a report on Mutually Offsetting Benefit leases.SLI 12-3-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that FAS submit a report on Mutually Offsetting Benefit leases.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien, Lisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that FAS submit a report on Mutually Offsetting Benefit leases

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that FAS submit a business plan for a municipal bank.SLI 12-6-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that FAS submit a business plan for a municipal bank.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that FAS submit a business plan for a municipal bank

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT submit a report on New Mobility Options and Emerging Uses of the Right-of-Way.SLI 35-3-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT submit a report on New Mobility Options and Emerging Uses of the Right-of-Way.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien, Rob Johnson
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT submit a report on New Mobility Options and Emerging Uses of the Right-of-Way

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT submit a report on transit speed and reliability improvements and RapidRide implementation.SLI 35-4-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT submit a report on transit speed and reliability improvements and RapidRide implementation.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT submit a report on transit speed and reliability improvements and RapidRide implementation

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDOT and Office of the Waterfront report on planning for potential use of area in Belltown after decommissioning of the….SLI 35-16-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT and Office of the Waterfront report on planning for potential use of area in Belltown after decommissioning of the….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT and Office of the Waterfront report on planning for potential use of area in Belltown after decommissioning of the Battery Street Tunnel

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Council's intent to review and consider legislative approval of SDOT's proposal for the revised Move Seattle spending plan.SLI 35-18-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Council's intent to review and consider legislative approval of SDOT's proposal for the revised Move Seattle spending plan.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Mike O'Brien
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleCouncil's intent to review and consider legislative approval of SDOT's proposal for the revised Move Seattle spending plan

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SDOT include performance measures and identify construction funding in any Center City Streetcar operating agreement.SLI 35-19-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransitPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT include performance measures and identify construction funding in any Center City Streetcar operating agreement.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
TransitPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT include performance measures and identify construction funding in any Center City Streetcar operating agreement

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that HSD send weekly encampment monitoring reports.SLI 14-98-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD send weekly encampment monitoring reports.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Sally Bagshaw
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD send weekly encampment monitoring reports

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that HSD submit a report on RFP design for eviction prevention rental subsidy programs.SLI 15-9-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD submit a report on RFP design for eviction prevention rental subsidy programs.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD submit a report on RFP design for eviction prevention rental subsidy programs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
CBO report on feasibility of issuing bonds for affordable housing and Equitable Development Initiative (EDI).SLI 1-3-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

CBO report on feasibility of issuing bonds for affordable housing and Equitable Development Initiative (EDI).

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Affordable HousingPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleCBO report on feasibility of issuing bonds for affordable housing and Equitable Development Initiative (EDI)

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request to CBO for legislation creating a Sweetened Beverage Tax fund and a Short-Term Rental tax fund and establishing spending guidance.SLI 1-5-B-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request to CBO for legislation creating a Sweetened Beverage Tax fund and a Short-Term Rental tax fund and establishing spending guidance.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest to CBO for legislation creating a Sweetened Beverage Tax fund and a Short-Term Rental tax fund and establishing spending guidance

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request to the Mayor’s office and the SDHR to provide to the Labor Management Leadership Committee a report on the City's contracts….SLI 1-6-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request to the Mayor’s office and the SDHR to provide to the Labor Management Leadership Committee a report on the City's contracts….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest to the Mayor’s office and the SDHR to provide to the Labor Management Leadership Committee a report on the City's contracts for services.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that ARTS, DON, DPR, and OIR participate in creation of principles to review of memorials, plaques, and artwork on City-owned land….SLI 2-4-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-originArts & Culture Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that ARTS, DON, DPR, and OIR participate in creation of principles to review of memorials, plaques, and artwork on City-owned land….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that ARTS, DON, DPR, and OIR participate in creation of principles to review of memorials, plaques, and artwork on City-owned land referencing, honoring, or displaying Native American culture

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request Seattle Center to pursue opportunities to support additional facilities at the replacement skatepark.SLI 4-1-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request Seattle Center to pursue opportunities to support additional facilities at the replacement skatepark.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest Seattle Center to pursue opportunities to support additional facilities at the replacement skatepark

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request to CBO for a report on the City of Seattle's jail services contract with King County.SLI 12-70-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request to CBO for a report on the City of Seattle's jail services contract with King County.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest to CBO for a report on the City of Seattle's jail services contract with King County.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that the Office of the Mayor submit a report on fixed-mobile Community Health Engagement Location (CHEL) site selection.SLI 14-2-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the Office of the Mayor submit a report on fixed-mobile Community Health Engagement Location (CHEL) site selection.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Office of the Mayor submit a report on fixed-mobile Community Health Engagement Location (CHEL) site selection

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that HSD provide guidelines for homelessness service provision to the LGBTQ community.SLI 15-17-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD provide guidelines for homelessness service provision to the LGBTQ community.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD provide guidelines for homelessness service provision to the LGBTQ community

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that the Mayor's Office create a client group with Council regarding the consideration and implementation of homelessness governance recommendations.SLI 15-18-B-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness ServicesGovernment Accountability Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the Mayor's Office create a client group with Council regarding the consideration and implementation of homelessness governance recommendations.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness ServicesGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Mayor's Office create a client group with Council regarding the consideration and implementation of homelessness governance recommendations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that Seattle City Light submit a monthly report about power outages.SLI 32-3-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originElectricity Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that Seattle City Light submit a monthly report about power outages.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that Seattle City Light submit a monthly report about power outages

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
SDCI led research and recommendation on strategies to support tenants by addressing habitability issues in rental units on a faster timeline.SLI 33-5-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SDCI led research and recommendation on strategies to support tenants by addressing habitability issues in rental units on a faster timeline.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSDCI led research and recommendation on strategies to support tenants by addressing habitability issues in rental units on a faster timeline

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
SDCI report on a regulatory path to allow tiny-homes as a long-term housing option.SLI 33-10-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SDCI report on a regulatory path to allow tiny-homes as a long-term housing option.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSDCI report on a regulatory path to allow tiny-homes as a long-term housing option

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
SDOT report on implementation of the Thomas Street greenway.SLI 35-13-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SDOT report on implementation of the Thomas Street greenway.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Rob Johnson
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSDOT report on implementation of the Thomas Street greenway

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that SPD and Seattle I.T. submit a report on a database for LEAD.SLI 38-2-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD and Seattle I.T. submit a report on a database for LEAD.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD and Seattle I.T. submit a report on a database for LEAD

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that the Executive submit a report on special events cost recovery.SLI 38-3-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the Executive submit a report on special events cost recovery.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Executive submit a report on special events cost recovery

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests that SPU analyze the Utility Discount Program as part of its Affordability and Accountability Strategic Plan.SLI 40-1-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Utilities & TechnologyCouncil-originGovernment Accountability Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests that SPU analyze the Utility Discount Program as part of its Affordability and Accountability Strategic Plan.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Government Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequests that SPU analyze the Utility Discount Program as part of its Affordability and Accountability Strategic Plan

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that SDOT submit a report on Interbay corridor transportation improvements, maintenance needs, and funding.SLI 35-15-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SDOT submit a report on Interbay corridor transportation improvements, maintenance needs, and funding.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SDOT submit a report on Interbay corridor transportation improvements, maintenance needs, and funding

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that HSD provide a report on homelessness outreach service provision.SLI 15-20-A-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that HSD provide a report on homelessness outreach service provision.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that HSD provide a report on homelessness outreach service provision

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request that OCR submit a report of the results of its review of authority and resources to more effectively investigate complaints of….SLI 21-2-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originWorkplace StandardsCivil Rights Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OCR submit a report of the results of its review of authority and resources to more effectively investigate complaints of….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Workplace StandardsCivil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OCR submit a report of the results of its review of authority and resources to more effectively investigate complaints of workplace harassment and discrimination City-wide

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Request OPCD, DON, and OCR prepare a racial equity analysis of the City's Growth Strategy.SLI 29-4-B-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request OPCD, DON, and OCR prepare a racial equity analysis of the City's Growth Strategy.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest OPCD, DON, and OCR prepare a racial equity analysis of the City's Growth Strategy

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
SDOT and HSD report on transit passes for City-contracted human service workers.SLI 35-7-A-2-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SDOT and HSD report on transit passes for City-contracted human service workers.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSDOT and HSD report on transit passes for City-contracted human service workers

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Affirming and commending the validity and application of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to peace and human dignity everywhere.Res 31858 · Resolution (Res) · 2018 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredCouncil-origin

Affirming and commending the validity and application of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to peace and human dignity everywhere.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 10, 2018
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming and commending the validity and application of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to peace and human dignity everywhere.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the University of Washington Canoe House/ASUW Shell House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12….CB 119414 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the University of Washington Canoe House/ASUW Shell House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125742December 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the University of Washington Canoe House/ASUW Shell House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Japanese Language School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 119418 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Japanese Language School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125743December 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Japanese Language School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Edris Nurses Home, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 119422 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Edris Nurses Home, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125744December 20, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Edris Nurses Home, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedNeighborhoods. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the City of Seattle as a Welcoming City that promotes policies and programs to foster inclusion for all, and serves its….Res 31730 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesAccessibilityImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming the City of Seattle as a Welcoming City that promotes policies and programs to foster inclusion for all, and serves its….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesAccessibilityImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming the City of Seattle as a Welcoming City that promotes policies and programs to foster inclusion for all, and serves its residents regardless of their immigration or refugee status, race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, gender identity, political ideology, disability, homelessness, low-income or veteran status, and reaffirming the City’s continuing commitment to advocate and support the wellbeing of all residents.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $250,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Proclaiming May Day, May 1, 2017 to be a day of action for worker, immigrant, and refugee rights.Res 31745 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Proclaiming May Day, May 1, 2017 to be a day of action for worker, immigrant, and refugee rights.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 28, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION proclaiming May Day, May 1, 2017 to be a day of action for worker, immigrant, and refugee rights; affirming that City employees may request unpaid leave for a day of conscience on May 1, 2017, and requesting that City Departments communicate to City employees the benefits conferred by state law for religious and conscientious leave for state and local government employees.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Seattle City Light Power Control Center, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of….CB 118973 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationElectricity Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Seattle City Light Power Control Center, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125321June 1, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Seattle City Light Power Control Center, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2018, and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community….Res 31762 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2018, and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 7, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2018, and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Planning Commission review and make recommendations about the proposed amendments.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Seattle Asian Art Museum, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….CB 119063 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationArts & Culture Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Seattle Asian Art Museum, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125418September 29, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Seattle Asian Art Museum, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Maritime Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 119064 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Maritime Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125419September 29, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Maritime Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming The City of Seattle’s support of immigrant communities.Res 31779 · Resolution (Res) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming The City of Seattle’s support of immigrant communities.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 3, 2017 · Tim Burgess administration
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming The City of Seattle’s support of immigrant communities; stating its support of the Deferred Action Childhood Arrival (DACA) program; recognizing the roots and community DACA recipients have built in the Seattle/King County region and beyond, and The City of Seattle’s commitment to an inclusive, welcoming City and advancing policies to protect vulnerable communities while denouncing national and federal policies and rhetoric targeting immigrants and immigrant communities.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
SPU's Employee to Manager Ratio.SLI 13-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SPU's Employee to Manager Ratio.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSPU's Employee to Manager Ratio

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Downtown Alley Congestion Relief.SLI 56-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Downtown Alley Congestion Relief.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleDowntown Alley Congestion Relief

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
SFD and SPD report on building first responder partnerships with social and health service providers or other resources.SLI 195-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SFD and SPD report on building first responder partnerships with social and health service providers or other resources.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSFD and SPD report on building first responder partnerships with social and health service providers or other resources

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report by Arts on creating a cultural space management public development authority (PDA).SLI 71-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-originPermitting & DevelopmentArts & Culture Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by Arts on creating a cultural space management public development authority (PDA).

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & DevelopmentArts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by Arts on creating a cultural space management public development authority (PDA)

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Report on including K-12 education programs funded by the Sweetened Beverage Tax in future Families and Education Levy.SLI 163-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originYouth & EducationTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report on including K-12 education programs funded by the Sweetened Beverage Tax in future Families and Education Levy.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Youth & EducationTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport on including K-12 education programs funded by the Sweetened Beverage Tax in future Families and Education Levy

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Create and outline an inclusive role of Boards and Commissions in the City Council Budget Review Process.SLI 296-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originBudget & Appropriations Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Create and outline an inclusive role of Boards and Commissions in the City Council Budget Review Process.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Budget & Appropriations
View record
Scoring details

Official titleCreate and outline an inclusive role of Boards and Commissions in the City Council Budget Review Process

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
SLI to Develop Recommendations on Worker Retention Protections.SLI 400-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SLI to Develop Recommendations on Worker Retention Protections.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSLI to Develop Recommendations on Worker Retention Protections

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) expansion.SLI 260-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) expansion.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleLaw Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) expansion

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Feasibility study for siting a safe consumption site in Seattle.SLI 261-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Feasibility study for siting a safe consumption site in Seattle.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleFeasibility study for siting a safe consumption site in Seattle

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report by CBO on options for the use of revenues from the Income Tax on High-Income Residents.SLI 401-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by CBO on options for the use of revenues from the Income Tax on High-Income Residents.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by CBO on options for the use of revenues from the Income Tax on High-Income Residents

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Report by OED on financial tools for Legacy Businesses.SLI 170-2-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Economy & Small BusinessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by OED on financial tools for Legacy Businesses.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by OED on financial tools for Legacy Businesses

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Speed and Reliability recommendations for the South Lake Union and First Hill streetcar lines.SLI 55-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Speed and Reliability recommendations for the South Lake Union and First Hill streetcar lines.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSpeed and Reliability recommendations for the South Lake Union and First Hill streetcar lines

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Public sector child care program study.SLI 164-1-B-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Public sector child care program study.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titlePublic sector child care program study

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
SPD Overtime Overexpenditure Workgroup.SLI 203-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SPD Overtime Overexpenditure Workgroup.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSPD Overtime Overexpenditure Workgroup

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
FAS reporting on Navigation Team pursuant to City Auditor reporting plan recommendations.SLI 242-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

FAS reporting on Navigation Team pursuant to City Auditor reporting plan recommendations.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleFAS reporting on Navigation Team pursuant to City Auditor reporting plan recommendations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests FAS review the costs of all regulatory fees and report to the Council on the level of General Subfund subsidy involved….SLI 336-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests FAS review the costs of all regulatory fees and report to the Council on the level of General Subfund subsidy involved….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequesting FAS review the costs of all regulatory fees and report to the Council on the level of General Subfund subsidy involved in each one

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
SDOT and OSE food access pilot.SLI 31-1-B-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originHuman Services & Food Security Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SDOT and OSE food access pilot.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Human Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSDOT and OSE food access pilot

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Transportation Management Plan monitoring and enforcement fee proposal.SLI 57-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Transportation Management Plan monitoring and enforcement fee proposal.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleTransportation Management Plan monitoring and enforcement fee proposal

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Automated enforcement of block-the-box and transit-only lane violations.SLI 58-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Automated enforcement of block-the-box and transit-only lane violations.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAutomated enforcement of block-the-box and transit-only lane violations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Transportation Network Company adoption of Autonomous Vehicle technology.SLI 60-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTechnology & Broadband Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Transportation Network Company adoption of Autonomous Vehicle technology.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Technology & Broadband
View record
Scoring details

Official titleTransportation Network Company adoption of Autonomous Vehicle technology

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
SDOT CIP Transparency.SLI 61-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SDOT CIP Transparency.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSDOT CIP Transparency

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Implementation of Move Seattle Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridors.SLI 62-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransit Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Implementation of Move Seattle Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridors.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Transit
View record
Scoring details

Official titleImplementation of Move Seattle Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridors

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
P-Patch program report by DON.SLI 79-2-B-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

P-Patch program report by DON.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleP-Patch program report by DON

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
OPCD report on community planning prioritization.SLI 135-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

OPCD report on community planning prioritization.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleOPCD report on community planning prioritization

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Surveillance Impact Report for Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).SLI 287-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originHomelessness Services Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Surveillance Impact Report for Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSurveillance Impact Report for Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Requests the Executive and Council develop and participate in a community-led stakeholder engagement process to establish an Employee Hours Tax and/or other….SLI 335-1-D-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests the Executive and Council develop and participate in a community-led stakeholder engagement process to establish an Employee Hours Tax and/or other….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequesting the Executive and Council develop and participate in a community-led stakeholder engagement process to establish an Employee Hours Tax and/or other revenue tools

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Healthy Foods Here Implementation.SLI 30-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Healthy Foods Here Implementation.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleHealthy Foods Here Implementation

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Report by OPCD on work to support Seattle School District facility planning.SLI 134-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by OPCD on work to support Seattle School District facility planning.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by OPCD on work to support Seattle School District facility planning

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
LAW, SMC, and SOCR report on bail reform.SLI 303-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

LAW, SMC, and SOCR report on bail reform.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleLAW, SMC, and SOCR report on bail reform

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Restructuring the Judgment and Claims Subfund.SLI 356-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Restructuring the Judgment and Claims Subfund.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRestructuring the Judgment and Claims Subfund

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Report by the Executive on reentry recommendations.SLI 402-2-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by the Executive on reentry recommendations.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by the Executive on reentry recommendations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
SPD Report on Overtime Policy Implementation.SLI 202-1-A-3-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SPD Report on Overtime Policy Implementation.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSPD Report on Overtime Policy Implementation

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
SPD smartphone business case.SLI 204-1-B-3-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SPD smartphone business case.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSPD smartphone business case

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report on SPD enforcement of vehicle noise and cruising on Alki.SLI 207-1-A-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report on SPD enforcement of vehicle noise and cruising on Alki.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport on SPD enforcement of vehicle noise and cruising on Alki

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Report regarding how the Executive plans to implement Resolution 31775, strengthening public safety by affirming the City's support for immigrant and refugee….SLI 270-1-B-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report regarding how the Executive plans to implement Resolution 31775, strengthening public safety by affirming the City's support for immigrant and refugee….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport regarding how the Executive plans to implement Resolution 31775, strengthening public safety by affirming the City's support for immigrant and refugee witnesses, survivors, and victims of crime

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report by HSD and SDHR on disparities between internal and contracted human service provider wages.SLI 281-1-B-2-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by HSD and SDHR on disparities between internal and contracted human service provider wages.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by HSD and SDHR on disparities between internal and contracted human service provider wages

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Requests that the Executive work with the Council to convene a stakeholder process to explore refinements and improvements to the Employee Hours….SLI 335-2-B-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests that the Executive work with the Council to convene a stakeholder process to explore refinements and improvements to the Employee Hours….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Taxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequesting that the Executive work with the Council to convene a stakeholder process to explore refinements and improvements to the Employee Hours Tax

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
SPD Records Management System monthly capital project oversight reports.SLI 26-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPoliceGovernment Accountability Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SPD Records Management System monthly capital project oversight reports.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
PoliceGovernment Accountability
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSPD Records Management System monthly capital project oversight reports

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Bond Funding for Additional Affordable Housing.SLI 230-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & Debt Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Bond Funding for Additional Affordable Housing.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien, Lisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Affordable HousingTaxes, Revenue & Debt
View record
Scoring details

Official titleBond Funding for Additional Affordable Housing

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
SPD Training Report.SLI 206-1-B-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SPD Training Report.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSPD Training Report

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Creation of Georgetown Public Safety Task Force.SLI 213-1-B-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creation of Georgetown Public Safety Task Force.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleCreation of Georgetown Public Safety Task Force

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report on Bridge Safety Analysis study.SLI 59-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originBridges & Structures Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report on Bridge Safety Analysis study.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 15, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Bridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport on Bridge Safety Analysis study

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report regarding how the Executive plans to implement Resolution 31775, strengthening public safety by affirming the City's support for immigrant and refugee….SLI 270-1-C-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originImmigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report regarding how the Executive plans to implement Resolution 31775, strengthening public safety by affirming the City's support for immigrant and refugee….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 15, 2017
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Immigrant, Refugee & Tribal Affairs
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport regarding how the Executive plans to implement Resolution 31775, strengthening public safety by affirming the City's support for immigrant and refugee witnesses, survivors, and victims of crime

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Operational plan for Homelessness Emergency Response program moved to HSD from FAS.SLI 231-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originEmergency ManagementHomelessness Services Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Operational plan for Homelessness Emergency Response program moved to HSD from FAS.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 20, 2017
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Emergency ManagementHomelessness Services
View record
Scoring details

Official titleOperational plan for Homelessness Emergency Response program moved to HSD from FAS

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Imposes controls upon the Campbell Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 119141 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Campbell Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125486December 8, 2017 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Campbell Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Macy's West Stores, Inc., permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across 3rd Avenue, between Pine Street and….CB 118610 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Macy's West Stores, Inc., permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across 3rd Avenue, between Pine Street and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124985February 11, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Macy's West Stores, Inc., permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across 3rd Avenue, between Pine Street and Stewart Street, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $100,170. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Urging the authorities in the Mexican federal government and the state of Guerrero to release Nestora Salgado, and requesting that the U.S.….Res 31651 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Urging the authorities in the Mexican federal government and the state of Guerrero to release Nestora Salgado, and requesting that the U.S.….

OutcomeAdoptedFebruary 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION urging the authorities in the Mexican federal government and the state of Guerrero to release Nestora Salgado, and requesting that the U.S. State Department increase its efforts to secure her release in its diplomatic discussions with Mexico.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon Fire Station No. 5, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 118657 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon Fire Station No. 5, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125021April 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon Fire Station No. 5, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Pioneer Sand and Gravel Company Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of….CB 118658 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Pioneer Sand and Gravel Company Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125022April 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Pioneer Sand and Gravel Company Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the Seattle City Council’s commitment to high quality locally produced broadcast news to effectively inform the public in the case of….Res 31673 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Government Operations & FinanceDepartment-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming the Seattle City Council’s commitment to high quality locally produced broadcast news to effectively inform the public in the case of….

OutcomeAdoptedJune 27, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant, Lisa Herbold
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming the Seattle City Council’s commitment to high quality locally produced broadcast news to effectively inform the public in the case of emergencies.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2017.Res 31682 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2017.

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2017; and requesting that the Office of Planning and Community Development and the Seattle Planning Commission review and make recommendations about the proposed amendments.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon The Theodora, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and….CB 118731 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon The Theodora, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125105August 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon The Theodora, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Gaslight Inn, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 118768 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Gaslight Inn, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125126September 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Gaslight Inn, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the J.W. Bullock House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 118769 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the J.W. Bullock House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125127September 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the J.W. Bullock House, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Adopts competitive procedures for disposition of the properties.CB 118788 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originCity Property Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Adopts competitive procedures for disposition of the properties.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125130September 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the disposition of two City Urban renewal properties in the Yesler-Atlantic Redevelopment Project Area; adopting competitive procedures for disposition of the properties; authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing to dispose of the properties designated Parcel 7B and Parcel 56 in the project area; designating the disposition of sales proceeds; superseding Ordinance 122017 and Resolutions 27260, 28866, and 29852 with respect to the sale of the properties; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $2,000,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Grants Swedish Health Services permission to construct, maintain, and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across Minor Avenue, between Columbia Street and….CB 118796 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Swedish Health Services permission to construct, maintain, and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across Minor Avenue, between Columbia Street and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125142September 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Swedish Health Services permission to construct, maintain, and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across Minor Avenue, between Columbia Street and Cherry Street, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $13,475. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Mount Baker Park Presbyterian Church, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….CB 118770 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationParks & Recreation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Mount Baker Park Presbyterian Church, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125154October 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Mount Baker Park Presbyterian Church, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Endorses community principles for green jobs, requesting that the Interdepartmental Team on Workforce Entry and Employment Pathways incorporate strategies to advance green….Res 31712 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceDepartment-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Endorses community principles for green jobs, requesting that the Interdepartmental Team on Workforce Entry and Employment Pathways incorporate strategies to advance green….

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 7, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold, Mike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION endorsing community principles for green jobs, requesting that the Interdepartmental Team on Workforce Entry and Employment Pathways incorporate strategies to advance green careers for people of color and other marginalized or under-represented groups, supporting sustainable entrepreneurship and economic cooperative models.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $150,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Reaffirming Seattle’s commitment to the Climate Action Plan and setting expectations for increasing commercial building energy efficiency through the year 2035.Res 31714 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originClimateElectricity Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Reaffirming Seattle’s commitment to the Climate Action Plan and setting expectations for increasing commercial building energy efficiency through the year 2035.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 10, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ClimateElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming Seattle’s commitment to the Climate Action Plan and setting expectations for increasing commercial building energy efficiency through the year 2035.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Requests that the Washington State Department of Transportation preserve one support pier associated with the Roanoke/R.H. Thomson Expressway.Res 31716 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Requests that the Washington State Department of Transportation preserve one support pier associated with the Roanoke/R.H. Thomson Expressway.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 17, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION requesting that the Washington State Department of Transportation preserve one support pier associated with the Roanoke/R.H. Thomson Expressway; stating the City Council’s intent to fund an engineering study of the pier’s structural integrity; and stating the City Council’s intent that the City accept ownership of the pier.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Data collection on participants in Park District Funded Programs for People.SLI 79-2-A-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originParks & Recreation Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Data collection on participants in Park District Funded Programs for People.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleData collection on participants in Park District Funded Programs for People

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Report by SDCI on updated information for the public about the cost and process for code interpretation letters and legal building site….SLI 142-2-A-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by SDCI on updated information for the public about the cost and process for code interpretation letters and legal building site….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by SDCI on updated information for the public about the cost and process for code interpretation letters and legal building site letters

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
SDCI Tenant Landlord Resource Center.SLI 144-1-A-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originTenant Protections Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SDCI Tenant Landlord Resource Center.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Tenant Protections
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSDCI Tenant Landlord Resource Center

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Analysis of the implementation of the Heroin and Prescription Opiate Addiction Task Force recommendations (2016).SLI 219-1-B-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Analysis of the implementation of the Heroin and Prescription Opiate Addiction Task Force recommendations (2016).

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Official sponsorsRob Johnson
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAnalysis of the implementation of the Heroin and Prescription Opiate Addiction Task Force recommendations (2016)

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Report by SEEC related to outreach for the Democracy Voucher program.SLI 306-1-B-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by SEEC related to outreach for the Democracy Voucher program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by SEEC related to outreach for the Democracy Voucher program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Streetcar and bicycle safety report.SLI 65-1-A-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originTransitTraffic Safety Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Streetcar and bicycle safety report.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
TransitTraffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleStreetcar and bicycle safety report

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Terminal 5 Quiet Zone.SLI 66-1-A-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originZoning Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Terminal 5 Quiet Zone.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Zoning
View record
Scoring details

Official titleTerminal 5 Quiet Zone

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Creation of special task force on South Park public safety.SLI 206-1-A-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originParks & Recreation Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Creation of special task force on South Park public safety.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleCreation of special task force on South Park public safety

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Monthly presentation to the Human Services and Public Health Committee regarding the Mayor's interim action plan for homelessness.SLI 249-1-A-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-originHomelessness ServicesPublic HealthHuman Services & Food Security Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Monthly presentation to the Human Services and Public Health Committee regarding the Mayor's interim action plan for homelessness.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Homelessness ServicesPublic HealthHuman Services & Food Security
View record
Scoring details

Official titleMonthly presentation to the Human Services and Public Health Committee regarding the Mayor's interim action plan for homelessness

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request OED to explore ways to increase the number of internships the City offers through the Mayor's Youth Employment Initiative.SLI 175-1-A-2-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-originYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request OED to explore ways to increase the number of internships the City offers through the Mayor's Youth Employment Initiative.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Official sponsorsM. Lorena González
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Youth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest OED to explore ways to increase the number of internships the City offers through the Mayor's Youth Employment Initiative

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Evaluation of the effectiveness of family resource centers.SLI 272-1-A-2-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Evaluation of the effectiveness of family resource centers.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleEvaluation of the effectiveness of family resource centers

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Imposes controls upon the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Garfield Exchange, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of….CB 118859 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Garfield Exchange, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of….

OutcomeEnacted as 125214December 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Garfield Exchange, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon Volunteer Park, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and….CB 118860 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationParks & Recreation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon Volunteer Park, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125215December 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon Volunteer Park, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the University Heights School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 118861 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the University Heights School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125216December 8, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the University Heights School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote5 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating the alley in Block 14, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Addition, bounded by Westlake Avenue, Virginia Street, 6th Avenue, Lenora Street….CB 118872 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating the alley in Block 14, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Addition, bounded by Westlake Avenue, Virginia Street, 6th Avenue, Lenora Street….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125223December 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the alley in Block 14, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Addition, bounded by Westlake Avenue, Virginia Street, 6th Avenue, Lenora Street, and 7th Avenue, on the petition of Acorn Development LLC (Clerk File 312260).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 1: the largest detected official amount is about $5,181,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 1Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Reaffirming Seattle’s values of inclusion, respect, and justice, and the City’s commitment toward actions to reinforce these values.Res 31724 · Resolution (Res) · 2016 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Reaffirming Seattle’s values of inclusion, respect, and justice, and the City’s commitment toward actions to reinforce these values.

OutcomeAdoptedDecember 16, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming Seattle’s values of inclusion, respect, and justice, and the City’s commitment toward actions to reinforce these values; and calling on President-elect Donald Trump to condemn recent attacks and hate speech that perpetuate religious persecution, racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and xenophobia.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Reaffirming the City of Seattle’s support of Somali communities to continue remittances to Somalia and the Horn of Africa.Res 31578 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Reaffirming the City of Seattle’s support of Somali communities to continue remittances to Somalia and the Horn of Africa.

OutcomeAdoptedMay 8, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming the City of Seattle’s support of Somali communities to continue remittances to Somalia and the Horn of Africa.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Montlake School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 118368 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric PreservationYouth & Education Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Montlake School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124778May 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic PreservationYouth & Education
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Montlake School, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Reaffirming the City’s commitment to update the Comprehensive Plan in 2015.Res 31597 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Reaffirming the City’s commitment to update the Comprehensive Plan in 2015.

OutcomeAdoptedJune 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION reaffirming the City’s commitment to update the Comprehensive Plan in 2015.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2016.Res 31599 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2016.

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION identifying proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to be considered for possible adoption in 2016; and requesting that the Department of Planning and Development and the Seattle Planning Commission review and make recommendations about the proposed amendments.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the human right to privacy and expressing a desire that the policies and products of the City’s privacy initiative be consistent….Res 31598 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-origin Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming the human right to privacy and expressing a desire that the policies and products of the City’s privacy initiative be consistent….

OutcomeAdoptedJuly 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Nick Licata
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming the human right to privacy and expressing a desire that the policies and products of the City’s privacy initiative be consistent with the right to privacy as described in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the applicable international human rights framework.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $2,015. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Expressing regret for the anti-Chinese legislation passed by the Washington Territory and previous Seattle City Councils, recognizing the past and continuing contributions….Res 31605 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyDepartment-originCivil Rights Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Expressing regret for the anti-Chinese legislation passed by the Washington Territory and previous Seattle City Councils, recognizing the past and continuing contributions….

OutcomeAdoptedAugust 14, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Civil Rights
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION expressing regret for the anti-Chinese legislation passed by the Washington Territory and previous Seattle City Councils, recognizing the past and continuing contributions of the Chinese to Seattle and reaffirming the City’s commitment to the civil rights of all people.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Affirming the City of Seattle’s support of Planned Parenthood and recognizing its vital role in providing health care.Res 31624 · Resolution (Res) · 2015 · Health & Human ServicesDepartment-originPublic Health Up to 2 pts
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Affirming the City of Seattle’s support of Planned Parenthood and recognizing its vital role in providing health care.

OutcomeAdoptedOctober 30, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTim Burgess, Jean Godden
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Public Health
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION affirming the City of Seattle’s support of Planned Parenthood and recognizing its vital role in providing health care.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal plan, study, request, or policy statement. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Implications for the City of Seattle, Workforce Development Council Report: Workforce Ecosystem Project.SLI 15-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & DevelopmentTourism & Workforce Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Implications for the City of Seattle, Workforce Development Council Report: Workforce Ecosystem Project.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Mike O'Brien
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & DevelopmentTourism & Workforce Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleImplications for the City of Seattle, Workforce Development Council Report: Workforce Ecosystem Project

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
DON Historic Preservation process improvements.SLI 19-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

DON Historic Preservation process improvements.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleDON Historic Preservation process improvements

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Race and Social Justice Initiative analysis of DON grant programs.SLI 20-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Civil Rights & DemocracyCouncil-originProcurement & Contracts Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Race and Social Justice Initiative analysis of DON grant programs.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Procurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRace and Social Justice Initiative analysis of DON grant programs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
OH Monitoring Program for Un-subsidized Rental Housing in Seattle.SLI 28-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

OH Monitoring Program for Un-subsidized Rental Housing in Seattle.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleOH Monitoring Program for Un-subsidized Rental Housing in Seattle

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
OPCD Equitable Development Implementation Plan for Seattle 2035.SLI 32-2-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

OPCD Equitable Development Implementation Plan for Seattle 2035.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Official sponsorsTim Burgess, Mike O'Brien
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleOPCD Equitable Development Implementation Plan for Seattle 2035

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Explore expanding the 1% for Art Program by eliminating exclusions.SLI 50-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-originArts & Culture Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Explore expanding the 1% for Art Program by eliminating exclusions.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Arts & Culture
View record
Scoring details

Official titleExplore expanding the 1% for Art Program by eliminating exclusions.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
West Seattle Bridge Corridor Improvements.SLI 95-2-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originBridges & Structures Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

West Seattle Bridge Corridor Improvements.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Tom Rasmussen
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Bridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleWest Seattle Bridge Corridor Improvements

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
SDOT report on parking benefit districts.SLI 100-2-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SDOT report on parking benefit districts.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSDOT report on parking benefit districts

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
An inventory of Public Benefits provided by Street and Alley Vacations.SLI 101-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

An inventory of Public Benefits provided by Street and Alley Vacations.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn inventory of Public Benefits provided by Street and Alley Vacations

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Analysis and report by HSD on the impact of major funding shift for agencies working with older adults and people with disabilities.SLI 118-1-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Analysis and report by HSD on the impact of major funding shift for agencies working with older adults and people with disabilities.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAnalysis and report by HSD on the impact of major funding shift for agencies working with older adults and people with disabilities

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
DON programs and Council Districts.SLI 18-2-A-1-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

DON programs and Council Districts.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleDON programs and Council Districts

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Request that DPD analyze and prepare implementing legislation for a rezone for the intersection of 16th Ave SW and SW Holden Street….SLI 33-1-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that DPD analyze and prepare implementing legislation for a rezone for the intersection of 16th Ave SW and SW Holden Street….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that DPD analyze and prepare implementing legislation for a rezone for the intersection of 16th Ave SW and SW Holden Street, including the former SCL Dumar Substation.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Dedicated Funding Source for Local Labor Laws.SLI 36-1-A-3-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Dedicated Funding Source for Local Labor Laws.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleDedicated Funding Source for Local Labor Laws

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Evaluate feasibility of developing an LGBTQ Community Center.SLI 66-1-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-originLibraries & Community Facilities Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Evaluate feasibility of developing an LGBTQ Community Center.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Libraries & Community Facilities
View record
Scoring details

Official titleEvaluate feasibility of developing an LGBTQ Community Center

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Report by Special Task Force on Chinatown/International District.SLI 80-1-A-4-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Arts, Culture & CommunityCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Report by Special Task Force on Chinatown/International District.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReport by Special Task Force on Chinatown/International District

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Explore greater collaboration and efficiency gains within the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) and Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) programs.SLI 87-1-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Explore greater collaboration and efficiency gains within the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) and Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) programs.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Police
View record
Scoring details

Official titleExplore greater collaboration and efficiency gains within the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) and Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) programs

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Commercial Rent Control.SLI 149-1-A-3-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Commercial Rent Control.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleCommercial Rent Control

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
DPD report to Council on (1) potential fee increases for the RRIO program to support an inspection auditing program and (2) a….SLI 25-2-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

DPD report to Council on (1) potential fee increases for the RRIO program to support an inspection auditing program and (2) a….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleDPD report to Council on (1) potential fee increases for the RRIO program to support an inspection auditing program and (2) a data collection plan on the value of repairs resulting from RRIO.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Requests the Executive identify policy direction, steps forward and sources of funding for a viable, privately operated childcare facility on the City's….SLI 76-2-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests the Executive identify policy direction, steps forward and sources of funding for a viable, privately operated childcare facility on the City's….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequesting the Executive identify policy direction, steps forward and sources of funding for a viable, privately operated childcare facility on the City's downtown Civic Center campus

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Requests that FAS develop a scope of work for the valuation of Seattle’s natural capital and how to incorporate that valuation into….SLI 75-1-A-2-2015 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2015 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-origin Up to 2 pts
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Requests that FAS develop a scope of work for the valuation of Seattle’s natural capital and how to incorporate that valuation into….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 23, 2015
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequesting that FAS develop a scope of work for the valuation of Seattle’s natural capital and how to incorporate that valuation into City reporting and planning

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Imposes controls upon Town Hall Seattle (former Fourth Church of Christ, Scientist), a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter….CB 118447 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon Town Hall Seattle (former Fourth Church of Christ, Scientist), a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124933December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon Town Hall Seattle (former Fourth Church of Christ, Scientist), a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Schoenfeld Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 118448 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Schoenfeld Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124934December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Schoenfeld Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Pacific Science Center, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 118522 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Pacific Science Center, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124932December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Pacific Science Center, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Swedish Health Services d.b.a. Swedish Medical Center/Ballard permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge and private utilities over and across….CB 118570 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Swedish Health Services d.b.a. Swedish Medical Center/Ballard permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge and private utilities over and across….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124939December 4, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsTom Rasmussen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Swedish Health Services d.b.a. Swedish Medical Center/Ballard permission to maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge and private utilities over and across Tallman Avenue Northwest, north of Northwest Central Avenue, for a ten-year term, renewable for two successive ten-year terms; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $7,776. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Imposes controls upon the Seattle Post-Intelligencer Globe, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….CB 118584 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Up to 2 pts
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Seattle Post-Intelligencer Globe, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124964December 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Seattle Post-Intelligencer Globe, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Renews permission for a West Seattle pedestrian skybridge for up to thirty years.CB 121022 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renews permission for a West Seattle pedestrian skybridge for up to thirty years.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127386January 27, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting HST Lessee West Seattle LLC permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian skybridge over and across Virginia Street, between 5th Avenue and 6th Avenue, for a 15-year term, renewable for one successive 15-year term; specifying the conditions under which this permit is granted; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $69,052. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to sell surplus SeaTac property to a local water district.CB 121166 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to sell surplus SeaTac property to a local water district.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127407March 23, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring real property identified as King County Parcel Number 1623049405 located at South 138th St in SeaTac, WA to be surplus to the City’s needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to execute all documents and take other necessary actions for the sale of the property to King County Water District 125; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $280,200. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts easements on two private properties so Seattle Public Utilities can stabilize their slopes.CB 121192 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts easements on two private properties so Seattle Public Utilities can stabilize their slopes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127421April 21, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to accept slope stabilization easements within two parcels of private property identified as King County Parcel Number 6844703215 located at 3822 NE 91st Street, and King County Parcel Number 6844703295 located at 3832 NE 91st Street; placing the properties under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $9,900. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to acquire two South Director Street properties, including through eminent domain.CB 121193 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to acquire two South Director Street properties, including through eminent domain.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127422April 21, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the acquisition of certain real property rights by negotiation or eminent domain (condemnation) of two parcels of land (Properties) identified as King County Parcel Number 4265700090 and King County Parcel Number 4265700085, both located at South Director Street; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle Public Utilities or designee to execute all documents and take other necessary actions to complete both Properties’ fee acquisition; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $760,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Puget Sound Energy an easement across City Light property in exchange for fair-market payment.CB 121204 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Puget Sound Energy an easement across City Light property in exchange for fair-market payment.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127446June 4, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to grant an easement over a portion of fee owned property to Puget Sound Energy; and accepting payment of the fair market value for the easement.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $6,800. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 1 opposed
Grants King County an easement across City Light property in exchange for fair-market payment.CB 121205 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants King County an easement across City Light property in exchange for fair-market payment.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127440June 4, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the City Light Department; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer or designee to grant an easement over a portion of fee owned property to King County; and accepting payment of the fair market value for the easement.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Extends the contract rezone and development agreement for a Rainier Avenue South property.CB 121220 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Extends the contract rezone and development agreement for a Rainier Avenue South property.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127448June 11, 2026
Official sponsorsEddie Lin
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ZoningPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to land use and zoning; approving the extension of a contract rezone approved by Ordinance 125632 and accepting an amended Property Use and Development Agreement for a property located at 5201 Rainier Avenue South (Application by Eagle Rock Ventures and 5201 Rainier, LLC, C.F. 314549, SDCI Project 3018378-LU).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedLegislative. explicit Council or Legislative Department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Leases city land for affordable housing, commercial space, early learning, and childcare near Mount Baker.CB 121236 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originAffordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Leases city land for affordable housing, commercial space, early learning, and childcare near Mount Baker.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127461July 8, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDionne Foster
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Affordable HousingPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to the Office of Housing; granting a ground lease of real property located at 2929 27th Ave South; authorizing the Director of the Office of Housing to grant a lease of the real property to MBTOD Phase One LLLP, an affiliate of Mercy Housing Northwest and El Centro de la Raza; and authorizing related agreements and actions to support the development of affordable housing and commercial space intended to be used for early learning, childcare center, and associated uses.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the official summary reports no direct financial effect. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers the Lake City Garage and Plaza property to Seattle Parks for municipal use.CB 121250 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers the Lake City Garage and Plaza property to Seattle Parks for municipal use.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127472July 22, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance relating to City-owned real property known as Lake City Garage and Plaza; transferring jurisdiction and management authority from the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to Seattle Parks and Recreation for municipal purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedFinance and Administrative Services (FAS). explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Allows a private operator to build and maintain a pedestrian skybridge across 8th Avenue.CB 121242 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2026 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Allows a private operator to build and maintain a pedestrian skybridge across 8th Avenue.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127488August 6, 2026 · Katie B. Wilson administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAn ordinance granting FH, LLC d/b/a Skyline permission to construct, maintain, and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across 8th Avenue, south of Columbia Street and north of Cherry Street, in the First Hill neighborhood; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $62,618. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renews Pike Place Market’s permission to operate a pedestrian skybridge over Western Avenue.CB 120924 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renews Pike Place Market’s permission to operate a pedestrian skybridge over Western Avenue.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127177January 30, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Pike Place Market Preservation and Development Authority permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian skybridge over and across Western Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Pike Street; repealing Section 7 of Ordinance 114388; and providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $3,568. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Conceptually approves a private pedestrian skybridge across 8th Avenue in First Hill.Res 32166 · Resolution (Res) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresNeighborhoods Up to 1 pt
Resolution (Res)ScoredDepartment-origin

Conceptually approves a private pedestrian skybridge across 8th Avenue in First Hill.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 10, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION granting conceptual approval to install, maintain, and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across 8th Avenue, north of Cherry Street; as proposed by FH, LLC d/b/a Skyline, in the First Hill neighborhood.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to sell surplus aqueduct property.CB 121014 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes Seattle Public Utilities to sell surplus aqueduct property.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127253July 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing a direct sale of real property identified in King County records as parcel 162206-9049-04, a portion of Lake Youngs Aqueduct Right-of-Way in King County, Washington to Sherrell Development LLC, establishing the fair market value for said parcel; and authorizing the General Manager/CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute all documents and take other necessary actions to complete the sale of the property; designating the proceeds from the sale; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $50,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts an easement for a Seattle Public Utilities drainage facility.CB 121015 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts an easement for a Seattle Public Utilities drainage facility.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127254July 18, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsJoy Hollingsworth
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the acceptance of an easement granted to the City of Seattle and recorded as King County document number 20220817000046 for the installation and operation of a drainage facility on property commonly known as 14100 Westwood Pl NE, King County parcel number 812410-0031; placing the property rights and interests conveyed by the easement under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $20,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts 25 easements for sidewalks, alley turnarounds, and signal poles.CB 121018 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts 25 easements for sidewalks, alley turnarounds, and signal poles.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127274August 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting twenty-five limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, alley turn-around, and signal pole purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following: rights of way: the sidewalk adjoining Lots 20 through 22, Central Addition to Columbia; the sidewalk adjoining Block 40, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell, (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 9, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights; the sidewalk adjoining Tract L, Ravenna Springs Park; the sidewalk adjoining a portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian (being known as Tract 11, Stewart Estate Tracts, an unrecorded plat); the sidewalk adjoining Block 3, Lindsley’s Mineral Springs Plat; the sidewalk adjoining a portion of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 29, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalk adjoining Block 25, Sander’s Supplemental Plat; the sidewalk adjoining Block 4, Yesler Terrace Community; the sidewalk adjoining Block 6, Highland View; the sidewalk adjoining Parcels A and B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3033003-LU, recorded under Recording No. 20211103900007 (previously known as a portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian and Tract 10, Stewart Estate Tracts, an unrecorded plat); the sidewalk adjoining Edward Hanford’s Donation Claim No. 44, an unrecorded plat, and Block 2, Peters Gardens; the sidewalk adjoining Block 4, Bowen’s Replat of Rainier Gardens; the sidewalk adjoining Tract 2, Salmon Bay Acre Tracts; the sidewalk adjoining Blocks 2 and 3, Canal Waterway, together with a portion of vacated alley; the sidewalk adjoining Parcels A and B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3033559-LU, recorded under Recording No. 20220119900017 (previously known as Block 1, Prospect Terrace Addition to the City of Seattle, as amended; the sidewalk adjoining Tracts 7 and 13, Excelsior Acre Tracts; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3037257-LU, recorded under Recording No. 20220601900003 (previously known as Block 4, Rainier Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 1, Rogers’ First Addition; the sidewalk adjoining Block 11, Porterfield’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 3, C. P. Stone’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 8, Dunlap’s Supplemental to the City of Seattle; the alley in 2100 Queen Anne Avenue North, a condominium, Vol. 330 of Condominiums, pages 4 through 17, under Recording No. 20220316000915 (previously known as Block 8, Cove Addition to Seattle); and the sidewalk adjoining the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts multiple deeds establishing or expanding public streets and alleys.CB 121019 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts multiple deeds establishing or expanding public streets and alleys.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127275August 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the alley in Block 16, Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell, deceased (commonly known as Heirs of Sara A. Bell’s Addition to the City of Seattle); South Willow Street abutting Tract 2, Coffman Garden Tracts; the alley in Block 2, West Seattle Land and Improvement Co’s Fourth Plat; the alley in Block 6, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; South State Street abutting Block 24, Sander’s Supplemental Plat; the alley in Block 60, D. T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; South Angeline Street abutting Tract B, Short Plat No. 80-153, recorded under King County Recording No. 8102260516 (also known as a portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 21, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian); the alley in Block 5, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 3, Winona Park; Southwest Orchard Street abutting Block 55, Homecroft; the alley abutting Block 12, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights; East Mercer Street abutting Block 7, Madison Street Addition to the City of Seattle, the alley in Block 24, Woodland Addition to Salmon Bay City; the alley in Block 5, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 11, Fairview Homestead Association, for the Benefit of Mechanics and Laborers; the alley in Block 22, South Park; the alley in Block 35, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 7, Brygger’s First Home Addition to the City of Ballard; the alley in Block 16, Licton Springs Park; the alley in Block 6, Highland View; the alley in Block 36, Second Addition to that part of the City of Seattle, as laid off by A. A. Denny and W. N. Bell (commonly known as Bell & Denny’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Parcels A and B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3039052-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20221108900003 (also known as Block 8, Licton Springs Park); Northeast 103rd Street abutting Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 8801045, recorded under King County Recording Number 198908150721 (also known as a portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 32, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian); the alley in Block 6, Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle; and the alley in Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3039574-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20221018900007 (also known as Block 2, Marion Highlands).)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts 25 easements for sidewalks, turnarounds, and traffic-signal infrastructure.CB 121020 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts 25 easements for sidewalks, turnarounds, and traffic-signal infrastructure.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127276August 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting twenty-five limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, alley turn-around, street turn-around, and signal pole purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following: rights of way: the sidewalk adjoining Block 12, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights; the alley abutting Block 2, Denny & Hoyt’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 54, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sara A. Bell, (deceased) (commonly known as Heirs of Sara A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining First Light, a Master Condominium, according to the Declaration, recorded in Vol. 331 of Condominiums, pages 1 through 8 under Recording No. 20220330000230, and First Light Parkade Condominium, a condominium according to the Declaration, recorded in Vol. 331 of Condominiums, pages 9 through 22 under Recording No. 20220330000232 (previously known as Lots 8, 9, and 12, Block 49, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny) (commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 44, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the sidewalk adjoining Block 15, Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle, Division Number 6; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel X, Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3038348-LU under King County Recording Number 20220622900002 (also known as Block 379, Seattle Tidelands together with vacated South Dakota Street); the sidewalk adjoining Blocks 1 and 5, Creedmoor Addition to the City of Seattle, together with adjoining vacated alley; the sidewalk adjoining Block 26, Sander’s Supplemental Plat; the sidewalk adjoining the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 9 Township 24 North Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalk abutting Tract 29, Frye’s Addition to Columbia; the sidewalk adjoining Block 14, Jos C. Kinnear’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel C, Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3038062-LU under King County Recording Number 20220307900002 (also known as Block 5, Greene’s Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 4, South Park; the sidewalk adjoining Block 52, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell, (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sara A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Lot 10, Lake Dell; the sidewalk adjoining Block 6, Highland View; the sidewalk adjoining Parcels X and Y, Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3040593-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20230908900001 (also known as a portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 32, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian); the sidewalk adjoining Block 6, Osner’s Suburban Homes; the sidewalk adjoining Block 87, D. T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 3, Kittingers Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcels A and B, Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3036633-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20230405900005 (also known as Block 1, S. F. Barker’s Suburban Home Addition Number 1); the sidewalk adjoining Parcels A and B, Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3040378-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20240103900008 (also known as Lot 12, Coffman Garden Tracts); the sidewalk and street adjoining portions of the L. M. Collins Donation Land Claim No. 46 (also known as portions of Sections 20, 21, 28, and 29, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian); and the sidewalk adjoining Block 78, Supplemental Plat of Woodland Park Addition to the City of Seattle.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacates a North Rainier alley and accepts a related development agreement.CB 121026 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacates a North Rainier alley and accepts a related development agreement.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127278August 14, 2025 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the alley in Block 14 Jos C. Kinnear’s Addition to the City of Seattle in the North Rainier Hub Urban Village neighborhood, and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement, on the petition of Grand Street Commons LLC, now Grand Street Commons MBH LLLP (Clerk File 314459).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Renews the University of Washington's permit for a 12th Avenue Northeast pedestrian skybridge.CB 120768 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renews the University of Washington's permit for a 12th Avenue Northeast pedestrian skybridge.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127028May 30, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting permission to the Board of Regents of the University of Washington to continue to operate and maintain an existing pedestrian skybridge over 12th Avenue Northeast, between Northeast 43rd Street and Northeast 45th Street; repealing Section 7 of Ordinance 119532; and providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $43,791. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Renews the University of Washington's permit for a University District alley skybridge.CB 120769 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Renews the University of Washington's permit for a University District alley skybridge.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127029May 30, 2024 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsRob Saka
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting the Board of Regents of the University of Washington permission to continue maintaining and operating an existing vehicular and pedestrian skybridge over and across the alley between 11th Avenue Northeast and 12th Avenue Northeast, north of Northeast 43rd Street; repealing Section 7 of Ordinance 119161; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $14,955. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.CB 120461 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126743January 9, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsSara Nelson
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to execute an agreement for the City to grant an easement over a portion of the City’s fee-owned transmission corridor near 19541 Stone Ave N in Shoreline, Washington; accepting payment for the true and full value of the easement being granted from Ann and Paul Michel, wife and husband; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $62,701. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedCity Light. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers jurisdiction of a portion of NE 130th Street from the Seattle Department of Transportation to Seattle Parks and Recreation for open….CB 120547 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers jurisdiction of a portion of NE 130th Street from the Seattle Department of Transportation to Seattle Parks and Recreation for open….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126801April 27, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAndrew Lewis
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Jackson Park; transferring jurisdiction of a portion of NE 130th Street from the Seattle Department of Transportation to Seattle Parks and Recreation for open space, park, and recreation purposes; transferring a portion of Jackson Park adjacent to NE 145th Street from Seattle Parks and Recreation to the Seattle Department of Transportation for transportation purposes; and finding, after a public hearing, that the exchange of property meets the requirements of Ordinance 118477 that adopted Initiative 42.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Parks & Recreation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights at the Foy Pump Station property (500 NE 145th St) as being surplus to the City’s municipal….CB 120574 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights at the Foy Pump Station property (500 NE 145th St) as being surplus to the City’s municipal….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126822May 31, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentWater & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights at the Foy Pump Station property (500 NE 145th St) as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs; authorizing the sale of 451 square feet of King County Parcel 756870-0780 and 460 square feet of King County Parcel 756870-0775, and granting 1,201 square feet and 453 square feet on the same respective parcels for 3-year term temporary construction easements to the City of Shoreline for the purposes of the 145th Street and I-5 Interchange Project; directing the proceeds therefrom to Seattle Public Utilities’ Water Fund; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $211,100. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants 300 Pine Street Condominium Association permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian skybridge over and across 3rd Avenue, between Pine….CB 120613 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants 300 Pine Street Condominium Association permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian skybridge over and across 3rd Avenue, between Pine….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126870July 31, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting 300 Pine Street Condominium Association permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian skybridge over and across 3rd Avenue, between Pine Street and Stewart Street; repealing Section 9 of Ordinance 124985; and providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $62,016. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the acceptance of a watermain easement within a portion of Parcel B on Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3011771 in Section 20….CB 120624 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2023 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the acceptance of a watermain easement within a portion of Parcel B on Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3011771 in Section 20….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126882August 14, 2023 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; authorizing the acceptance of a watermain easement within a portion of Parcel B on Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3011771 in Section 20, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington; placing the accepted easement under the jurisdiction of Seattle Public Utilities; declaring a portion of an existing watermain easement located on Parcel B surplus to the City’s needs and authorizing the relinquishment of the surplus portion of the easement; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Public Utilities. explicit non-Council department field
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of City Light.CB 120230 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationElectricityNeighborhoods Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of City Light.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126521January 10, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationElectricityNeighborhoods
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department, the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation, and the Seattle Department of Transportation; declaring certain real property rights to be surplus to the needs of City Light; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Seattle City Light to execute an easement agreement with King County, allowing the temporary use of a portion of City Light property to resolve the encroachment of an existing structure located on the west side of Boeing Field within the Northeast Quarter of Section 29 Township 24 N Range 4 E and the Southeast Quarter of Section 29 Township 24 N Range 4 E, and increasing the temporary use area authorized by Ordinance 126328 by approximately 207 square feet; and transferring jurisdiction of certain properties located in the Georgetown neighborhood in Section 29 Township 24 N, Range 4 E, from the City Light Department to the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation and to the Seattle Department of Transportation.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Swedish Health Services permission to continue maintaining and operating an existing pedestrian skybridge over and across Cherry Street, west of Broadway….CB 120302 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Swedish Health Services permission to continue maintaining and operating an existing pedestrian skybridge over and across Cherry Street, west of Broadway….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126592May 26, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Swedish Health Services permission to continue maintaining and operating an existing pedestrian skybridge over and across Cherry Street, west of Broadway and east of Minor Avenue; repealing Section 9 of Ordinance 123048; and providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $22,810. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 120380 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126669September 21, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 94, D.T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Lots 01 through 06 and Lots 15 through 22, Central Addition to Columbia; the alley in Block 40, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); Garfield Street abutting Block 7, Union Lake Addition Supplemental to the City of Seattle; 30th Avenue Northeast abutting Block 1, Kenwood Division Two; the alley in Block 13, Pontius Fourth Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block V, Bell’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle; the alleys in Parcel A and Parcel B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3029414 recorded under King County Recording Number 20180212900012 (previously known as Block 4, Sea View Park); the alley in Block 7, Queen Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 32, South Park; the alley in Block 20, North Seattle; the alley in Block 36, Second Addition to that part of the City of Seattle, as laid off by A.A. Denny and W.N. Bell (Commonly known as Bell & Denny’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 103, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 10, Westlake Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Unit 7, 516-528 Valley Street, a condominium, according to the Declaration thereof recorded under King County Recording Number 20191030000832, located in Survey Map and Plans filed in Volume 306 of Condominiums, pages 38 through 40 (previously known as Block 46, Replat of Blocks 44 to 53 inclusive Mercer’s Second Addition to North Seattle); and the alley in Parcels A, B, and C, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3032062-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20190109900005 (previously known as Block 10, Greenwood Park 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts 21 limited purpose easements for public sidewalk and alley turn-around purposes.CB 120381 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts 21 limited purpose easements for public sidewalk and alley turn-around purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126670September 21, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting 21 limited purpose easements for public sidewalk and alley turn-around purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the sidewalk adjoining Block 19, North Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Lot 1, John Oh Short Plat, City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 9802503, recorded under King County Recording No. 9811139005; the alley in Block 6, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A.A. Denny (Commonly known as A.A. Denny’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3031810-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180725900001 (previously known as Block 173, Gilman Park); the sidewalk adjoining Block 53, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell, (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 2, Werett’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 9, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel A, City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 3026630, recorded under King County Recording No. 20171214900005 (previously known as Block 9, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights); the sidewalk adjoining Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel X, City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 3033211-LU, recorded under Recording No. 20190625900001, as amended, (previously known as Tract 51, Maple Leaf Addition to Green Lake Circle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 12, Hillman City Division No. 6 (also known as Parcel B, City of Seattle Boundary Line Adjustment No. 8708146, as recorded under King County Recording Number 8804070228); the sidewalk adjoining Block 8, Lake View Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 9, Supplemental Plat of G. Kinnear’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block A, Greene’s Replat of Block 10, Squire Park Add. to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining the Southwest quarter of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalk adjoining Block 7, University Heights; the sidewalk adjoining Parcels A and B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3033818-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20200928900010 (previously known as Block 3, Capitol Hill Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1); the sidewalk adjoining Block 13, Westholme; the sidewalk adjoining Lots 4 and 5, Turk’s Addition to Columbia; the sidewalk adjoining the Southeast quarter of Section 16, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalk adjoining Block 2, Fruitvale Addition to the City of Seattle; and the sidewalk adjoining Block 12, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Dept. of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 120382 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126671September 21, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights of way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the alley in Block 5, The Byron Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Parcel A and B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3027604, recorded under King County Recording Number 20170915900006 (previously known as Lots 1 through 6, Block V, Bell’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 26, North Seattle; the alley in Block 5, South Park; Phinney Avenue North abutting Block 8, Osner’s Suburban Homes; the alley in Block 19, North Seattle; the alley in Block 24, D.T. Denny’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 1, Northolme; the alley in Block 2, West Seattle Land and Improvement Co.’s Fourth Plat; the alley in Block 92, Gilman Park; the alley in Block 9, Francies R., Day’s LaGrande; the alley in Block 15, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle; the alley in Block 5, Highland View; Union Bay Place Northeast abutting Block 9, Exposition Heights; the alley in Block 49, The Boston Co’s Plat of West Seattle; Northwest 100th Street abutting Tract 24, Berkeley Heights; the alley in Block 7, University Heights; the alley in Block 9, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights, Parcel A, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 3026630, recorded under King County Recording Number 20171214900005 (previously known as Block 9, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights), and a portion of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; Brooklyn Avenue Northeast abutting Block 9, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights, Parcel A, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 3026630, recorded under King County Recording Number 20171214900005 (previously known as Block 9, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights), and a portion of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; and South Rose Street abutting Block 2, Fruitvale Addition to the City of Seattle.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 120383 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126672September 21, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the alley in Block 60, D.T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 56, Gilman Park; Airport Way South abutting Parcels D and F, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3033668-LU, Volume 435 of Surveys at Pages 38-43, recorded under King County Recording Number 20201105900023 (previously known as Timothy Grow’s D L.C. and Government Lot 1 in Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian); the alley in Block 8, University Heights; the alley in Block 4, Rainier Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 80, D.T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Parcels A, B, and C, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3033269-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20190412900023 (previously known as Block 8, Queen Addition to the City of Seattle); South Holgate Street abutting Block 14, Jos. C. Kinnear’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 20, North Park; 46th Avenue South abutting Block 1, Dunlap’s Half Acre Tracts; South Director Street in Tract 7, Excelsior Acre Tracts; the alley in Block 16, Licton Springs Park; the alley in Block 133, Gilman Park; the alley in Block 90, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the alley in Block 49, H.W. Treat’s 1st Addition to the City of Ballard; the alley in Block 11, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; 11th Avenue Northeast abutting Block 11, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 12, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 7, South Park Heights; the alley in Block 1, Green Lake Circle Railroad Addition to the City of Seattle; Brooklyn Avenue Northeast abutting Block 8, University Heights; 7th Avenue South abutting Parcel C, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 3008635, recorded under King County Recording Number 20090617900005 (previously known as Tract 1, Excelsior Acre Tracts); South Pilgrim Street abutting Parcel C, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment 8900415, recorded under King County Recording Number 9107220324 (previously known as Lot 35, The First Addition to Rainier Beach); and the alley in Block 22, South Park.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 120403 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126673September 21, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 41, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A.A. Denny (commonly known as A.A. Denny’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle); 23rd Avenue Southwest abutting Block 42, Homecroft; the alley in Block 16, Claremont Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 67, Denny & Hoyt’s Addition to the City of Seattle; South Pearl Street abutting Lots 6 through 10, McCormick’s Addition to the City of Seattle (also known as City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3033048-LU, Volume 426 of Surveys at Pages 79-83, recorded under King County Recording Number 20200625900018); the alley in Block 32, Supplemental Plat to Maynard’s Plat of the Town of Seattle; the alley in Block 32, Town of Seattle, as laid out by D.S. Maynard, commonly known as D.S. Maynard’s Plat of Seattle; the alley in Block 10, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle; the alley in Parcels A and B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3036088-LU, Volume 425 of Surveys at Pages 183-185, recorded under King County Recording Number 20200617900007 (previously known as Block 14, South Park); the alley in Block 13, Eastern Addition to the Town of Seattle; South Rose Street abutting a portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 34, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the alley in Block 56, Gilman Park; South Myrtle Street abutting Block 10, Horton’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 40 and Block 52, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell, (deceased) (commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 4, South Park; the alley in Block 25, D.T. Denny’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3034930-LU, Volume 422 of Surveys at Pages 073-074, recorded under King County Recording Number 20200409900002 (previously known as Block 7, Town of Seattle as laid out on the Claims of C.D. Boren and A.A. Denny (commonly known as Boren & Denny’s Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 12, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle; the alley in Block 4, Rainier Boulevard Addition to the City of Seattle; 13th Avenue abutting Block 2, Struve’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 102, Gilman Park; the alley in Block K, Bell’s 5th Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 12, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights; and the alley in Block 32, South Park.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts twenty-five limited purpose easements for public sidewalk and alley turn-around purposes.CB 120404 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2022 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationWater & Wastewater Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts twenty-five limited purpose easements for public sidewalk and alley turn-around purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126674September 21, 2022 · Bruce Harrell administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting twenty-five limited purpose easements for public sidewalk and alley turn-around purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following: rights of way: the sidewalk adjoining Block 3, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcels B and C, City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 3012368, recorded under King County Recording Number 20111108900011 (previously known as Block 4, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Lots 16 through 25, Holtfreter’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 2103502, recorded under King County Recording Number 20011015900001 (previously known as Block 14, Eden Addition No. 2 to the City of Seattle); the alley abutting Lots 1 and 2, Central Addition to Columbia; the sidewalk adjoining a portion of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 3 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalk adjoining Block 30, Boulevard Place Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel Z, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3035659-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20210111900005 (previously known as Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3032687-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20190710900006, and Tracts 7 and 8, Rainier Beach Acre Tracts); the sidewalk adjoining Parcels A and B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3032311-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20190125900004 (previously known as Block 182, Seattle Tide Lands); the sidewalk adjoining Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3036813-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20210114900010 (previously known as Block 20, Osner’s Second Addition to Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 55, Town of Seattle, as laid out by D. S. Maynard, Commonly known as D. S. Maynard’s Plat of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 8, Exposition Heights; the sidewalk adjoining Block 3, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Lots A, B, and C, City of Seattle Unit Lot Subdivision No. 3034089-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20200213900014 (previously known as Block 5, University Heights); the sidewalk adjoining Block 1, Sturtevant’s Rainier Beach Lake Park Cottage Tracts; the sidewalk adjoining Lot 9, Haleakala Addition; the sidewalk adjoining Blocks 29 and 30, Boulevard Place Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 8, Oak Lake Villa Tracts; the sidewalk adjoining Block 44, Central Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcels A and B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3036465-LU recorded under King County Recording Number 20210915900006 (previously known as Block 4, James' Division of Green Lake Addition to Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 1, B. F. Day’s Eldorado; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel X, Seattle Lot Segregation, recorded under King County Recording Number 20071129900001 (situated in a portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 30, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian); the sidewalk adjoining a portion of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 29, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel X, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3037167-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20211110900005 (previously known as Block 8, Cedar Park); the sidewalk adjoining Block 11, Mercer’s Addition to North Seattle; and the sidewalk adjoining Block 12, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedDepartment of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (“SDOT”) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle….CB 119976 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksElectricityProcurement & Contracts Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (“SDOT”) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126265January 8, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksElectricityProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the East Marginal Way Grade Separation Project; authorizing the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation (“SDOT”) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, three quit claim deeds and an assignment and assumption of easement agreement for the East Marginal Way Overpass from the Port of Seattle, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (the “Port”); laying off the deeds as right-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by such deeds and easement under the jurisdiction of SDOT and designating for street purposes; authorizing the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager of Seattle Public Utilities (“SPU”) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, a stormwater easement from the Port; placing the stormwater easement under the jurisdiction of SPU and designating for utility purposes; authorizing the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager of Seattle City Light (“SCL”) to acquire, accept, and record, on behalf of The City of Seattle, an overhead and surface easement from the Port; placing the overhead and surface easement under the jurisdiction of SCL and designating for utility purposes; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: a portion of Parcel B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3022491, recorded under King County Recording Number 20181024900004, previously known as Lots 2, 3, 44, and 45, Block 385, Seattle Tide Lands; a portion of Parcel Z, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3020104, recorded under King County Recording Number 20181128900006, previously known as Lots 1 through 7 and Lots 26 through 30, Block 378, Lot 44, Block 385, and vacated 6th Avenue Southwest, all in Seattle Tide Lands; a portion of Lots 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, and 13, Block 377, Seattle Tide Lands, together with a portion of Duwamish Avenue, and a portion of Government Lot 1, Section 18, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; a portion of Lots 4 and 10, Block 377, Lots 3 and 44, Block 385, and Lot 4, Block 387, all in Seattle Tide Lands, and a portion of Government Lot 1, Section 18, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; a portion of Parcel Y, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3020104, recorded under King County Recording Number 20181128900006, previously known as Lots 42, 43, and 44, Block 385, and vacated 6th Avenue Southwest, all in Seattle Tide Lands; and a portion of Parcels A and B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3022491, recorded under King County Recording Number 20181024900004, previously known as Lots 2 and 3, Block 385, Lot 3, Block 387, and vacated 8th Avenue Southwest, all in Seattle Tide Lands, and a portion of Parcels Y and Z, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3020104, recorded under King County Recording Number 20181128900006, previously known as Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 29, and 30, Block 378 and Lots 3, 4, 40, 41, 42, 43, and 44, Block 385, and vacated 6th Avenue Southwest, all in Seattle Tide Lands.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the extension of a contract rezone approved by Ordinance 125433 and accepting an amended Property Use and Development Agreement for a….CB 119987 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredCouncil-origin

Approves the extension of a contract rezone approved by Ordinance 125433 and accepting an amended Property Use and Development Agreement for a….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126275February 1, 2021
Official sponsorsDan Strauss
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE approving the extension of a contract rezone approved by Ordinance 125433 and accepting an amended Property Use and Development Agreement for a property located at 1106 34th Avenue. (Petition by Martin Leibowitz, C.F. 314461, SDCI Project 3036784-LU)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedLEG. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Grants Grange Insurance Association permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian skybridge over and across the alley between 2nd Avenue and….CB 120074 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Grants Grange Insurance Association permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian skybridge over and across the alley between 2nd Avenue and….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126348May 28, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE granting Grange Insurance Association permission to continue maintaining and operating a pedestrian skybridge over and across the alley between 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue, north of Cedar Street; repealing Section 8 of Ordinance 123723; and providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $12,512. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers jurisdiction of a portion of Whitman Avenue N from the Seattle Department of Transportation to Seattle Parks and Recreation for open….CB 120032 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & Recreation Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers jurisdiction of a portion of Whitman Avenue N from the Seattle Department of Transportation to Seattle Parks and Recreation for open….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126366June 18, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Woodland Park; transferring jurisdiction of a portion of Whitman Avenue N from the Seattle Department of Transportation to Seattle Parks and Recreation for open space, park, and recreation purposes; transferring a portion of Woodland Park adjacent to East Green Lake Way N from Seattle Parks and Recreation to the Seattle Department of Transportation for transportation purposes; and finding, after a public hearing, that the exchange of property meets the requirements of Ordinance 118477, which adopted Initiative 42.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedParks & Recreation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125142.CB 120134 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & Structures Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125142.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126414August 12, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & Structures
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125142; granting Swedish Health Services permission to construct, maintain and operate a pedestrian skybridge over and across Minor Avenue, between Columbia Street and Cherry Street; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $27,060. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Authorizes the Director of Housing to execute an easement agreement for a sanitary sewer main line with the University of Washington.CB 120218 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2021 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes the Director of Housing to execute an easement agreement for a sanitary sewer main line with the University of Washington.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126465November 17, 2021 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda, Alex Pedersen
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesPermitting & DevelopmentWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to property at Sand Point; authorizing the Director of Housing to execute an easement agreement for a sanitary sewer main line with the University of Washington; authorizing related agreements and actions to support the development of cottages for people experiencing homelessness on a parcel owned by the City and leased to SP Cottages LLC; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $300,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 118631 to update insurance and bond requirements.CB 119844 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 118631 to update insurance and bond requirements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126134August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a pedestrian skybridge over and across Sixth Avenue, north of Pine Street; amending Ordinance 118631 to update insurance and bond requirements; amending the annual fee and other terms and conditions of the permit; renewing the term of the permit to MPH Pacific Place LLC; providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $147,312. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119851 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126138August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights of way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: South Trenton Street abutting Parcel A and Parcel B, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 3026975, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180131900006 (formerly known as Lot 15, Dunlap’s Plat of Land on Lake Washington); South Rose Street and 39th Avenue South abutting Tract 31 and Tract 32, Lake Dell; the alley in Block 34, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the alley in Block 4, Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1; the alley in Block 33, Little City Farms, Division No. 5; the alley in Block 148, Gilman Park; the alley in Block 1, Bowyer’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 22, Hill Tract Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 4, Weedin’s Division of Green Lake Addition to Seattle; Aurora Avenue North and North 128th Street abutting Parcel B and Parcel C, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3026911, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180516900007 (previously known as Tract 10, Tract 11, and Tract 12, Schreiner’s Garden Tracts); the alley in Block 158, Replat of Blocks 65, 66, 158, 159, 160, 161, and 163, Gilman Park; the alley in Block 15, University Park Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Parcel B, Seattle Short Subdivision Number 3027671, recorded November 9, 2017, under King County Recording Number 20171109900007 (previously known as Block 7, Francies R. Day’s LaGrande); the alley in Parcel A and Parcel B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment 3028296, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180301900004 (previously known as Block 23, South Park); the alley in Block 12, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 3, Borzone’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Parcel A and Parcel B, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 3030547-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180824900003 (previously known as Block 26, Gilman Park); and the alley in Block 4, Lawton Heights.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, and emergency vehicle, street, or alley turn-around purposes.CB 119852 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksCourts & Legal EnforcementParks & Recreation Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, and emergency vehicle, street, or alley turn-around purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126139August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksCourts & Legal EnforcementParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, and emergency vehicle, street, or alley turn-around purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way; the sidewalk adjoining Block 4, Robinson’s Tracts, together with a portion of vacated 39th Avenue South, vacated under Ordinance 118837; the sidewalk adjoining Block 3, Davis Addition to Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcels B and C, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3013809, recorded under King County Recording Number 20121018900001 (previously known as Block 111, Gangloff’s Addition to the City of Seattle, and a portion of The Donation Claim of D. T. Denny and Louisa Denny, his wife, and Government Lot 7, located in the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington); the sidewalk adjoining Block 81, D. T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 33, Block 43, and Block 44, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell, (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle), together with a portion of vacated Pine Street, vacated Terry Avenue, Lots 1 and 12, and the alley approved for vacation by Seattle City Council per Clerk File Number 314338 on May 7th, 2018, all within said blocks; the sidewalk adjoining the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; the street turn-around and the sidewalk adjoining Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3023386, recorded under King County Recording Number 20161011900002 (previously known as Tracts A, B, C, and D, Blocks 2, 3, and 26, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to the City of Seattle, together with a portion of vacated Front Street, vacated Second Avenue South, vacated Third Avenue South, and vacated alley, vacated under Ordinance Numbers 86205, 86872 and 109967, all within said block); the sidewalk adjoining Block 235, Seattle Tide Lands, together with a portion of South Lyons Street vacated under Ordinance 91450; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3023038-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180726900001 (previously known as a portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 16, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington and the Easterly margin of Martin Luther King Jr. Way South as established by Condemnation under King County Superior Court Cause Number 98096, pursuant to City of Seattle Ordinance Number 30673); the sidewalk adjoining Lot 13, Carney’s Supplemental Plat of Tract 5 in Bayside Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 5, Sorenson’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 135, Seattle Tide Lands, together with a portion of the vacated alley within said block lying between Lots 3 and 4, vacated under City of Seattle Ordinance Number 5009, and a portion of vacated West Galer Street, vacated under City of Seattle Ordinance Number 5010; the street turn-around abutting Block 140, Seattle Tide Lands; the emergency vehicle turn-around abutting Block 139, Seattle Tide Lands; the alley turn-around abutting Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 9905264, recorded under King County Recording Number 20000424900010 (previously known as Block 1, Pioneer Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Parcel A, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 3026975, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180131900006 (previously known as Lot 15, Dunlap’s Plat of Land on Lake Washington); and the sidewalk adjoining Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3031112-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180924900001 (previously known as Block 29, Woodland Addition to Salmon Bay City).)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, walkway, pedestrian, alley, utility, bicycle, and bridge purposes.CB 119855 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresTraffic Safety Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, walkway, pedestrian, alley, utility, bicycle, and bridge purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126142August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresTraffic Safety
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, walkway, pedestrian, alley, utility, bicycle, and bridge purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the public walkway in Block 15, Portion of the Town of Seattle, as laid out on the Land Claim of Wm. H. Bell, and the North Western Extremity of the Claim of A. A. Denny (Commonly known as Bell & Denny’s Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley and underground utility in Block 40, Denny and Hoyt’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 1, Orchard Hill Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 118, A. A. Denny’s Broadway Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel B, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 3022602-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20160505900007, as recorded in Book 342 of Surveys, pages 168 through 170, records of King County (previously known as Block 6, Union Lake Addition Supplemental to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3029150, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180309900001, as recorded in Volume 380 of Surveys, page 145, records of King County (previously known as Block 14, Greenwood Park Fifth Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 34, Woodlawn addition to Green Lake; the alley in Block 3, Stewart’s First Addition to West Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 15, University Park Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3031112-LU, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180924900001, as recorded in Volume 391 of Surveys, page 166, records of King County, Washington (previously known as Block 29, Woodlawn Addition to Salmon Bay City); and the sidewalk adjoining Block 2, Norris' Addition to West Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 7, Jackson Street Addition to the City of Seattle and Block 2, Burke’s Second Addition to the City of Seattle, together with a vacated portion of 24th Avenue South; the sidewalk adjoining Block 28, D. S. Maynard’s Plat of the Town of Seattle; the bridge and bridge column abutting Block 407, Seattle Tide Lands together with a portion of vacated Southwest Hanford Street; the sidewalk adjoining Block 7, Highland View; the sidewalk adjoining a portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 5, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, King County, Washington; the sidewalk adjoining Unit Lot A, City of Seattle Unit Lot Subdivision No. 3033930-LU, recorded under King County Recording No. 20191018900001 (previously known as Block 12, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle); and the bicycle and pedestrian trail abutting Blocks 139, 146, and 147, Seattle Tidelands, together with portions of vacated West Laramie Street and vacated Puget Avenue West, and a portion of Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3010369, recorded under King County Recording Number 20110503900006 (previously known as Blocks 139, 140, 145, 146, 147, and 149, Seattle Tidelands, together with portions of vacated West Laramie Street, vacated Puget Avenue West, vacated Stevens Street West, vacated Alaskan Way West, and the bisecting alleyways).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119856 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126143August 21, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsAlex Pedersen
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights of way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the alley in Block 9, University Heights; Northeast 75th Street abutting Block 7, Manor’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in a portion of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; the alley in Parcel A and Parcel B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 9804296, as recorded under King County Recording Number 19990629900016; the alley in Block 2, Shelton’s Addition to the City of Seattle; 11th Avenue Northeast abutting Block 2, Shelton’s Addition to the City of Seattle; South Juneau Street abutting Parcels A, B, C, D, E, and F, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 9804566, as recorded under King County Recording Number 20000329900010, and Parcel H, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 9804571, as recorded under King County Recording Number 199812089007; the alley in Block 78, Denny & Hoyt’s Supplemental Plat; the alley in Block 52, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell, (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 87, D. T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 9, The Byron Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 5, The Byron Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 81, Plat of D. T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 10, Claremont Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 5, University Heights; the alley in Block 10, Randell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle; Southwest Charlestown Street abutting Block 4, Seaboard Addition to the City of Seattle; 37th Avenue South abutting Lots 16 through 25, Holtfreter’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Lots 16 through 25, Holtfreter’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 15, Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 6; and South Grand Street abutting Block 6, Sunnyside Addition to the City of Seattle.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119521 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationWater & Wastewater Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125825June 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationWater & Wastewater
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 85, D. T. Denny’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block J, Bell’s 5th Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 34, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 4, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 106, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 12, North Seattle; the alley in Block 4, South Park; the alley in Block “G,” 4th Addn to the City of Seattle as laid off by Wm. N. Bell; the alley in Block 5, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; North 135th Street abutting Parcel X, Short Subdivision No. 3023564, under King County Recording Number 20160825900002; the alley in Block 55, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); 1st Avenue Northeast abutting Parcel Y and Parcel Z, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3020600, under King County Recording Number 20150903900008; the alley in Block 12, Cowen’s University Park; the alley in Parcel B, Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3019664, under King County Recording Number 20160224900011; the alley in Block 4, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle; the alley in Block 8, The Byron Addition to the City of Seattle; West Blaine Street abutting Replat of Blocks 7 and 8, James Addition, and Block 132, Seattle Tide Lands and that portion of Van Buren Ave., vacated by Ord. 13616; 1st Avenue North and Denny Way abutting Block 29, North Seattle; East Marginal Way South and South Michigan Street abutting Block 3, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to the City of Seattle; and 4th Avenue South and South Michigan Street abutting Block 14, Joseph R. McLaughlin’s Water Front Addition to the City of Seattle.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, street, or street and alley turn-around, and traffic signal purposes.CB 119522 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, street, or street and alley turn-around, and traffic signal purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125826June 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, street, or street and alley turn-around, and traffic signal purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: the sidewalk adjoining Block 5, Cedar Park; the sidewalk adjoining Block 27, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny (Commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle); the street turn-around adjoining Lots 1 and 2, Replat of Blocks 7 and 8, James Addition and Block 132, Seattle Tide Lands and that portion of Van Buren Avenue vacated by Ordinance 13616; the sidewalk adjoining a portion of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 11, Township 24, Range 3 East, W. M., the sidewalk adjoining Block 98, D. T. Denny’s 5th Addition to North Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 15, University Park Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel X, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 3023564, recorded under King County Recording No. 20160825900002; the sidewalk and alley turn-around adjoining Parcels A, B, and C, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3017558, recorded under King County Recording Number 20160921900020; the sidewalk adjoining the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 31, Township 26 North, Range 4 East, W. M.; the sidewalk adjoining Block 1, Hulten’s Addition; the sidewalk adjoining Block 3, Witt’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley turn-around adjoining Parcel B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3022694, recorded Under King County Recording No. 20160915900002; the sidewalk adjoining Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3020008, recorded in Book 337 of Surveys, pages 111 through 113, records of King County, Washington; the sidewalk adjoining Block 6, Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid out by A. A. Denny (Commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 2, Cowen’s University Park; the sidewalk adjoining Block 79, Maple Leaf Addition to Green Lake Circle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 46, Replat of Blocks 44 to 53 inclusive Mercer’s Second Addition to North Seattle; Eastlake Avenue East abutting Block 42, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; and North 34th Street abutting Parcel C, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 9700157, recorded under King County Recording No. 9706050452.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119523 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125827June 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 22, Second Addition to the part of the City of Seattle, as laid off by A. A. Denny and W. N. Bell (Commonly known as Bell & Denny’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 27, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny (Commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 47, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny (Commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 1, Thompson’s University Addition to King County; Portage Bay Place East abutting Block 42, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; West Armory Way abutting Parcel C, Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 2505852/3007838, recorded under King County Recording Number 20070830900001; the alley in Block 6, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny (Commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 26, Gilman’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 9, Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid out by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell deceased (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 3, Munson & Custer’s Addition to Green Lake Circle; the alley in Block 1, Garland’s First Addition to the City of Seattle; Southwest 105th Street abutting the Southeast quarter of Section 2, Township 23 North, Range 3 East, Willamette Meridian; the alley in Block 2, Norris’ Addition to West Seattle; the alley in Block 29, North Seattle; the alley in Lot 5, The Longfellow Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 3, Elbert Place Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 28, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the alley in Block 2, Dunlap’s Supplemental to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 44, Denny & Hoyt’s Addition to the City of Seattle; and South Charleston Street and Courtland Place South abutting Block 23, York Addition to Seattle.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, alley, or street and alley turn-around purposes.CB 119524 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksCourts & Legal EnforcementParks & Recreation Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, alley, or street and alley turn-around purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125828June 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksCourts & Legal EnforcementParks & Recreation
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting twenty limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, alley, or street and alley turn-around purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way; the sidewalk adjoining Block 47, A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 55, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell, (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 13, Lake View Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 3, Munson and Custer’s Addition to Green Lake Circle (also being known as that portion of Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3022189, King County Recording Number 20161026900005); the sidewalk adjoining Tract 15, Frye’s Addition to Columbia; the alley in Block 3, York 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle and Block 44, C. D. Hillman’s Rainier Boulevard Garden Addition; the alley in a portion of Unit A, Urban Terrace Condominium, declaration recorded under King County Recording Number 20060417001456; the sidewalk adjoining Block 24, Hill Tract Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Wilson Court Condominium, declaration recorded under King County Recording Number 199104180603; the sidewalk adjoining Block 40, Compton’s 1st Addition to the City of Seattle and Block 1, William’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the street turn-around adjoining Block 5, McArthur’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 54, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the street turn-around adjoining Parcel B, City of Seattle, Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3018894, King County Recording Number 20160106900003; the sidewalk adjoining Block 3, Seaboard Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 46, Supplemental Plat of Blocks 7, 8, 10, 11, 27, 28, 30, 45, and 46 of Wallingford’s Park Division of Green Lake Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk of Block 8, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Unit Lot A, City of Seattle Unit Lot Subdivision Number 3029542, recorded in Block 378 of Surveys, pages 175 through 181, under King County Recording Number 20180201900004; the alley turn-around adjoining Parcel B, Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3022244, recorded under King County Recording Number 20160803900008; and the sidewalk adjoining Block 86, D. T. Denny’s Park Addition to North Seattle.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119525 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125829June 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 4, South Park; the alley in Block 2, May Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 7, Francies R. Day’s LaGrande; the alley in Block 17, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 29, Gilman Park; the alley in Block 75, D. T. Denny’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 91, D. T. Denny’s 5th Addition to North Seattle; Northeast 88th Street abutting Parcel B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 9602207, recorded under King County Recording Number 9709259002; the alley in Block 12, Squire’s Lakeside Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 27, Gilman’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 6, University Park Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 8, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle; the alley in Block 2, Replat of a Portion of Stewart’s First Addition to West Seattle; 25th Avenue South abutting Block 2 and Block 5, McArthur’s Addition to the City of Seattle; South Raymond Street abutting Block 2, Raymond Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 18, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 75, D. T. Denny’s Home Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 55, Boston Co’s Plat of West Seattle; and the alley in Block 1, Greenwood Park 2nd Add. to the City of Seattle.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119526 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125830June 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 38, Mercer’s 2nd Addition to North Seattle; South Alaska Street and 38th Avenue South abutting Block 1, Replat of Block 1 and N. 1/2 of Block 2, Kramer Heights Add. to the City of Seattle; Southwest Charlestown Street abutting Block 3, Seaboard Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 5, University Scenic Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 3, Seaboard Addition to the City of Seattle; Aurora Avenue North abutting Block 3, Aurora Heights; the alley in Block 3, Stewart’s First Addition to West Seattle, and Block 2, Replat of a portion of Stewart’s First Addition to West Seattle; the alley in Block 23, Commercial Street Steam Motor Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Parcel B and Parcel C, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3028767, recorded under King County Recording Number 20180104900004, as amended under City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 3031344 under King County Recording Number 20180323900002 (also known as Block 1, Meadow Park Addition to Columbia City); the alley in Block 34, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the alley in Block 158, Replat of Blocks 65, 66, 158, 159, 160, 161, and 163, Gilman Park; the alley in Block 95, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 5, The Byron Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 15, The Byron Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 4, South Park; the alley in Block 48, Replat of the Green Lake Home Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 27, Hill Tract Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 5, Burke & Farrar’s Fifth Addition to the City of Seattle; and the alley in Block 6, Hillman City Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating the alley in Block 19, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition, in the block bounded by 6th Avenue, Blanchard Street….CB 119527 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating the alley in Block 19, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition, in the block bounded by 6th Avenue, Blanchard Street….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125831June 3, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the alley in Block 19, Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition, in the block bounded by 6th Avenue, Blanchard Street, 7th Avenue, and Lenora Street, on the petition of Acorn Development LLC (Clerk File 312261).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers jurisdiction over the portion of Broad Street between Thomas Street and Taylor Avenue North from the Seattle Department of Transportation to….CB 119566 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-origin Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers jurisdiction over the portion of Broad Street between Thomas Street and Taylor Avenue North from the Seattle Department of Transportation to….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125867July 26, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsBruce Harrell, Debora Juarez
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Broad Street; transferring jurisdiction over the portion of Broad Street between Thomas Street and Taylor Avenue North from the Seattle Department of Transportation to the Seattle Center Department for purposes of constructing, operating, and maintaining a public skate plaza.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $10,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Center (CEN). preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating the alley in Block 1, Witt’s Addition, on the petition of 2026 Madison Corner, LLC and LMC 2026 Madison Holdings, LLC….CB 119561 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating the alley in Block 1, Witt’s Addition, on the petition of 2026 Madison Corner, LLC and LMC 2026 Madison Holdings, LLC….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125924September 20, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the alley in Block 1, Witt’s Addition, on the petition of 2026 Madison Corner, LLC and LMC 2026 Madison Holdings, LLC (Clerk File 306083).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Authorizes an amendment to the Amended and Restated Lease between Sand Point Community Connections LLC and the City authorized by Ordinance 122459….CB 119641 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originHomelessness ServicesPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an amendment to the Amended and Restated Lease between Sand Point Community Connections LLC and the City authorized by Ordinance 122459….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125931September 25, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Homelessness ServicesPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to property at Sand Point; authorizing an amendment to the Amended and Restated Lease between Sand Point Community Connections LLC and the City authorized by Ordinance 122459, as amended by Ordinance 123195 and Ordinance 125366; removing one parcel from that lease; authorizing the Director of Housing to grant a new lease of the removed parcel; and authorizing related agreements and actions to support the development of cottages for the homeless on that parcel.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedOffice of Housing. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Transfers jurisdiction of the former Loyal Heights and Phinney Substation properties from the City Light Department to the Office of Housing for….CB 119635 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originElectricity Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers jurisdiction of the former Loyal Heights and Phinney Substation properties from the City Light Department to the Office of Housing for….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125960October 11, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsTeresa Mosqueda
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Electricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department and the Office of Housing; transferring jurisdiction of the former Loyal Heights and Phinney Substation properties from the City Light Department to the Office of Housing for the purpose of developing permanently affordable home ownership.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle City Light. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating the alley in Block 81, Terry’s Second Addition, and an aerial portion of 9th Avenue between Jefferson Street and Alder Street….CB 119628 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating the alley in Block 81, Terry’s Second Addition, and an aerial portion of 9th Avenue between Jefferson Street and Alder Street….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126019December 13, 2019 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the alley in Block 81, Terry’s Second Addition, and an aerial portion of 9th Avenue between Jefferson Street and Alder Street on the petition of King County (Clerk File 304408); and accepting a Property Use and Development Agreement.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Transfers jurisdiction over real property located at Mercer Street and Second Avenue from the Seattle Center Department to the Office of Housing.CB 119186 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Transfers jurisdiction over real property located at Mercer Street and Second Avenue from the Seattle Center Department to the Office of Housing.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125528February 14, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE transferring jurisdiction over real property located at Mercer Street and Second Avenue from the Seattle Center Department to the Office of Housing.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119207 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125542March 16, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights of way: Yale Avenue East abutting a portion of Parcel B, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment Number 9001790, recorded under King County Recording Number 9102130171; 16th Avenue Southwest abutting Block 406, Seattle Tide Lands and vacated Southwest Lander Street; the alley in Block 91, D. T. Denny’s 5th Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 19, Denny-Fuhrman Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 3, University Heights; Northeast 50th Street abutting Block 3, University Heights; the alley in Block 47, Addition to the City of Seattle as laid off by D. T. Denny, Guardian of the Estate of J. H. Nagle (Commonly known as Nagle’s Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 3, Witt’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 32, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the alley in Block 6, Boston Heights Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 5, McCallister’s Addition to Seattle; the alley in Block 7, University Heights; the alley in Block 4, Lawton Heights; the alley in Block 10, Green Lake Reservoir Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 39, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny (Commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 40, Addition to the City of Seattle, as laid off by D. T. Denny, Guardian of the Estate of J. H. Nagle (Commonly known as Nagle’s Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 3, Borzone’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 23, Gilman’s Addition to the City of Seattle; Southwest Spokane Street and Fauntleroy Avenue Southwest abutting a portion of Lots 1 through 6, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 9205663, recorded under King County Recording Number 9608130752, previously known as Lot 4, City of Seattle Short Subdivision No. 79-27, recorded under King County Recording Number 7908211093; and Martin Luther King Junior Way South abutting Lot 15, Dunlap’s Plat of Land on Lake Washington.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Vacating the alley in Block 22, Brooklyn Addition and additional adjacent right-of-way, and the alley in Block 23, Brooklyn Addition, on the….CB 119327 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & Sidewalks Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Vacating the alley in Block 22, Brooklyn Addition and additional adjacent right-of-way, and the alley in Block 23, Brooklyn Addition, on the….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125657August 24, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & Sidewalks
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE vacating the alley in Block 22, Brooklyn Addition and additional adjacent right-of-way, and the alley in Block 23, Brooklyn Addition, on the petition of the University of Washington (Clerk File 310162 and Clerk File 310163).

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedSeattle Department of Transportation. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed1 not voting
Declares as surplus certain portions of a portion of the City’s Tolt Water Transmission Pipeline right-of-way, King County Assessor Parcel number 0326049122….CB 118870 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares as surplus certain portions of a portion of the City’s Tolt Water Transmission Pipeline right-of-way, King County Assessor Parcel number 0326049122….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125246January 26, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsLisa Herbold
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationTrees & Habitat
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Public Utilities Department; declaring as surplus certain portions of a portion of the City’s Tolt Water Transmission Pipeline right-of-way, King County Assessor Parcel number 0326049122, to serve the property commonly known as 19229 47th Ave NE, The City of Lake Forest Park, Washington 98156, Elizabeth Simmons-O’Neill and John Joseph O’Neill, Grantee’s property, King County Assessor Parcel number 4400900040, and granting a non-exclusive easement for existing utility service lines, and the maintenance and use of a driveway access over and across the same.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $3,350. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City Light Department and the Department of Parks and Recreation.CB 118912 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationElectricity Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City Light Department and the Department of Parks and Recreation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125266March 2, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationElectricity
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City Light Department and the Department of Parks and Recreation; superseding Section 7 of Ordinance 124917 and transferring jurisdiction of the former Delridge Substation from the City Light Department to the Department of Parks and Recreation for open space, park and recreation purposes.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $80,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Related to the City Light Department and the Department of Parks and Recreation.CB 118960 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originParks & RecreationElectricityCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Related to the City Light Department and the Department of Parks and Recreation.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125329June 23, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsDebora Juarez
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Parks & RecreationElectricityCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE related to the City Light Department and the Department of Parks and Recreation; declaring certain real property rights surplus to the needs of the City Light Department; and transferring jurisdiction of the former Lakewood Substation from the City Light Department to the Department of Parks and Recreation for open space, park, and recreation purposes.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $210,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote6 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 117105, updating the insurance and bond requirements.CB 118991 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 117105, updating the insurance and bond requirements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125349July 21, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a pedestrian skybridge over and across Seneca Street, west of Terry Avenue; amending Ordinance 117105, updating the insurance and bond requirements; amending the annual fee and other terms and conditions of the permit; renewing the term of the permit to Virginia Mason Medical Center; providing for acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $35,937. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.CB 119013 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts various deeds for street or alley purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125355July 21, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting various deeds for street or alley purposes; laying off, opening, widening, extending, and establishing portions of rights-of-way; placing the real property conveyed by said deeds under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley in Block 51, Denny & Hoyt’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 5, University Heights; the alley in Block 9, Fairview Homestead Association, for the Benefit of Mechanics and Laborers; the alley in Block 103, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 108, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the alley in Block 21, North Seattle; the alley in Block 52, Boston Co’s Plat of West Seattle; the alley in Block 16, Columbia; the alley in Block 6, Ross Second Addition to the City of Seattle; the alley in Block 159, Replat of Blocks 65, 66, 158, 159, 160, 161, and 163, Gilman Park; South Fidalgo Street abutting Parcel Z, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 3010110, recorded under King County Recording No. 20090909900007; the alley in Block 27, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley in Block 56, Gilman Park; the alley in Block 1, Weedin’s Division of Green Lake; the alley in Block 29, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the alley in Block 24, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the alley in Block 20, Gilman’s Addition to the City of Seattle; and the alley in Block 17, North Seattle.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts 20 limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, street access, alley, and alley turn-around purposes.CB 119014 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2017 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts 20 limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, street access, alley, and alley turn-around purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125356July 21, 2017 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting 20 limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, street access, alley, and alley turn-around purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the sidewalk adjoining Block 5, Kenwood Division One; the sidewalk adjoining a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; the sidewalk adjoining Block 108, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 20, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition to the City of Seattle); public access to 15th Avenue Northeast via the alley in Block 25, Brooklyn Addition to Seattle and vacated Northeast Pacific Street; the sidewalk abutting Parcel A, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment 3009442, recorded under King County Recording Number 20100728900004 (previously known as Block 2, Carr’s Addition to the City of Seattle and Block 9, Boston Heights Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk abutting Parcel Z, City of Seattle Lot Boundary Adjustment 3010110, recorded under King County Recording Number 20090909900007 (previously known as Government Lot 3 in the Southwest quarter of Section 20, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian); the sidewalks abutting Block 27, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley and alley turn-around in Block 27, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk abutting Block 5, Buckius Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk abutting Parcels A & B, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 3019754, recorded under King County Recording Number 20151023900001 (previously known as Block 5, Walker’s Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk abutting Block 39, Addition to the Town of Seattle, as laid out by A. A. Denny (commonly known as A. A. Denny’s 6th Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk abutting Block 56, Terry’s First Addition to the Town of Seattle; the sidewalk abutting Block 135, A. A. Denny’s Broadway Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk abutting Block 15, Pontius Third Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk abutting Lot 1, City of Seattle Short Subdivision 9205663, recorded under King County Recording Number 9608130752; and the sidewalk abutting Parcel B-1, City of Seattle Short Subdivision Number 77-110, recorded under King County Recording Number 7707260710.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.CB 118513 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124977January 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to execute an agreement for the City to grant an easement for access purposes over a portion of the City’s fee-owned transmission corridor at 14355 Linden Avenue North in Seattle, Washington, and to accept the release of an easement at said address; accepting payment for the true and full value of the easement being granted from Rise Properties (Woodland Pointe) Limited Partnership; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $23,500. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 122202, updating the insurance and bond requirements.CB 118612 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 122202, updating the insurance and bond requirements.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124987February 11, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksBridges & StructuresPermitting & Development
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to a pedestrian skybridge over and across the alley between University Way Northeast and 15th Avenue Northeast, north of Northeast 45th Street, and certain window protrusions over a portion of University Way Northeast; amending Ordinance 122202, updating the insurance and bond requirements; amending the annual fee and other terms and conditions of the permit; renewing the term of the permit to Limantzakis Properties No. 1 LLC; providing for the acceptance of the permit and conditions; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $7,116. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts 22 limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, utility, alley turn-around, or public access purposes.CB 118724 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Transportation & InfrastructureDepartment-originStreets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts 22 limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, utility, alley turn-around, or public access purposes.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125087July 29, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Streets & SidewalksParks & RecreationCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE accepting 22 limited purpose easements for public sidewalk, utility, alley turn-around, or public access purposes; placing the real property conveyed by such easements under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Department of Transportation; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts. (This ordinance concerns the following rights-of-way: the alley turn-around in Block 93, D. T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 7, Pettit’s University Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 4, Sorenson’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalks adjoining Block 4, Fairview Homestead Association, for the Benefit of Mechanics and Laborers; the sidewalk adjoining Block 42, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition to the City of Seattle); the alley turn-around in Block 33, Boston Co.’s Plat of West Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 33, Boston Co.’s Plat of West Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 60 and Block 61, Woodlawn Addition to Green Lake; the sidewalk adjoining Block 5, Sorenson’s Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 1, Greenwood Park Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block 19, Second Addition to the Town of Seattle as laid off by the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell (deceased) (Commonly known as Heirs of Sarah A. Bell’s 2nd Addition to the City of Seattle); the sidewalk adjoining Block 45 and Block 48, Replat of Oneida Gardens Addition to Seattle; the sidewalks adjoining Tract 9, Lake Dell; the sidewalk adjoining Block 10, Assessor’s Plat of University Heights; the sidewalk and utilities easement adjoining Parcel A and Parcel B, City of Seattle, Lot Boundary Adjustment No. 2505852/3007838, recorded under King County Recording No. 20070830900001; the sidewalk adjoining Block 9, Eden Addition to the City of Seattle; the sidewalk adjoining Block “G,” 4th Addition to the City of Seattle as laid off by Wm. N. Bell; the sidewalk adjoining Block 21, Sander’s Supplemental Plat; the sidewalk adjoining Block 107, David T. Denny’s First Addition to North Seattle; the alley turn-around in Block 2, Jackson Park Addition; the public access easement in Burlington Northern, Inc.’s right-of-way for its Sumas Branch in the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 25 North, Range 4 East, W.M.)

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs.CB 118359 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124754April 17, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
City Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to Seattle Public Utilities; declaring certain real property rights as being surplus to the City’s municipal utility needs; granting an easement to Burlington Northern Railway Company, for limited purposes, over and across the City’s Cedar River Pipeline #4 right of way (a.k.a. Bow Lake Pipeline), King County Assessor Parcel number 0005800017.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $250,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
Accepts an easement for water and sewer purposes over, under, through, across, along and upon property commonly known as 3707 SW 105th….CB 118380 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originWater & WastewaterCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Accepts an easement for water and sewer purposes over, under, through, across, along and upon property commonly known as 3707 SW 105th….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124780May 22, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsSally Bagshaw
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Water & WastewaterCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the Seattle Public Utilities’ Arbor Heights Fire Flow Improvements project; accepting an easement for water and sewer purposes over, under, through, across, along and upon property commonly known as 3707 SW 105th Street, King County Assessor Parcel number 022303-9302; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Approves the extension of a contract rezone and a Property Use and Development Agreement approved by Ordinance 121164 and amended by Ordinance….CB 118410 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Housing & HomelessnessDepartment-originPermitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Approves the extension of a contract rezone and a Property Use and Development Agreement approved by Ordinance 121164 and amended by Ordinance….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124788June 18, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsMike O'Brien
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Permitting & DevelopmentProcurement & Contracts
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE approving the extension of a contract rezone and a Property Use and Development Agreement approved by Ordinance 121164 and amended by Ordinance 124194 for the Seattle Housing Authority’s High Point Garden Community housing development located at 6550 32nd Avenue SW.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.CB 118423 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2015 · Utilities & TechnologyDepartment-originElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property Up to 1 pt
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Declares certain real property rights surplus to utility needs.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124815July 29, 2015 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsKshama Sawant
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
ElectricityProcurement & ContractsCity Property
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department; declaring certain real property rights surplus to utility needs; authorizing the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer to execute an agreement for the City to grant an easement for parking and access purposes over a portion of the City’s fee-owned Bothell-Canal Transmission Corridor at 17524 Aurora Avenue North in the City of Shoreline, Washington; accepting payment for the true and full value of the easement from GCW Shoreline, LLC, and WG @ Shoreline, LLC; and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $525,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value1
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).CB 119720 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2020 · Budget & AppropriationsDepartment-origin Weight 6No individual sponsor
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 126033January 10, 2020 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 125724, which adopted the 2019 Budget, including the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); changing appropriations to various departments and budget control levels, and from various funds in the Budget; adding new CIP projects revising project allocations for certain projects in the 2019-2024 CIP; abrogating positions; modifying positions, and ratifying and confirming certain prior acts; all by a 3/4 vote of the City Council.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 2: the largest detected official amount is about $50,904,200. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 2: implementation crosses departments or affects a core citywide governmental function.

Where the proposal startedCity Budget Office. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value6
Reach 1Fiscal scale 2Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
No individual sponsor listed
Request that SPD provide quarterly reports on staffing, overtime, and performance metrics.SLI SPD-108S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Weight 3No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD provide quarterly reports on staffing, overtime, and performance metrics.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Policeno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD provide quarterly reports on staffing, overtime, and performance metrics.

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Request that the MO provide quarterly reports regarding activities and performance of the Unified Care Team (UCT), and any collaborating departments that….SLI MO-001S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-origin Weight 3No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the MO provide quarterly reports regarding activities and performance of the Unified Care Team (UCT), and any collaborating departments that….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the MO provide quarterly reports regarding activities and performance of the Unified Care Team (UCT), and any collaborating departments that manage the City's response to unsanctioned encampments

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 1: the request creates a recurring reporting requirement. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Request that CBO and SCERS analyze an early retirement incentive for City employees.SLI CBO-004S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Weight 3No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CBO and SCERS analyze an early retirement incentive for City employees.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO and SCERS analyze an early retirement incentive for City employees

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
No individual sponsor listed
Request that CBO collaborate with SDHR to report on developing or enhancing programs for City employees subject to layoff.SLI CBO-002S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Labor & City WorkforceCouncil-origin Weight 3No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CBO collaborate with SDHR to report on developing or enhancing programs for City employees subject to layoff.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CBO collaborate with SDHR to report on developing or enhancing programs for City employees subject to layoff

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
No individual sponsor listed
Request that FAS and SDOT report on the feasibility of a Transportation Assistance Voucher Program.SLI TNCSPN-103-B-1 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2019 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-origin Weight 3No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that FAS and SDOT report on the feasibility of a Transportation Assistance Voucher Program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 19, 2019
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that FAS and SDOT report on the feasibility of a Transportation Assistance Voucher Program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 2: the requested work explicitly requires cross-department coordination.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 2
No individual sponsor listed
Authorizes an agreement with the Arboretum Foundation for support of the Seattle Japanese Garden.CB 118595 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2016 · Environment, Climate & ParksDepartment-originProcurement & Contracts Weight 3No individual sponsor
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Authorizes an agreement with the Arboretum Foundation for support of the Seattle Japanese Garden.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 124979January 14, 2016 · Ed Murray administration
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Procurement & Contractsno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE authorizing an agreement with the Arboretum Foundation for support of the Seattle Japanese Garden.

Reach 1: the action serves a defined program, department, or user group rather than every resident directly. Fiscal 0: the largest detected official amount is about $70,000. Durability 0: the action is transactional, technical, advisory, or one-time. Institutional scope 1: one department or city system is principally responsible for implementation.

Where the proposal startedContact Person/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value3
Reach 1Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
No individual sponsor listed
Request that SPD report on its Parking Enforcement Officer hiring process.SLI SPD-103S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Transportation & InfrastructureCouncil-originPolice Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on its Parking Enforcement Officer hiring process.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Policeno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on its Parking Enforcement Officer hiring process

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Request that OH produce a Seattle Housing Investment Plan that takes a comprehensive look at all affordable housing investments by the City….SLI OH-001S-A · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2025 · Housing & HomelessnessCouncil-originAffordable Housing Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that OH produce a Seattle Housing Investment Plan that takes a comprehensive look at all affordable housing investments by the City….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 14, 2025
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Affordable Housingno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that OH produce a Seattle Housing Investment Plan that takes a comprehensive look at all affordable housing investments by the City for 2025-2030

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Request that SPD report on backgrounding services.SLI SPD-304-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on backgrounding services.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Policeno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on backgrounding services

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Request that CSCC report on staffing and call answering.SLI CSCC-300-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CSCC report on staffing and call answering.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CSCC report on staffing and call answering

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Express Council’s intent to update policies related to the City’s annual budget process, and to apply the $10 million underspend assumption for….SLI LEG-322-A-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent · 2023 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative IntentScoredCouncil-origin

Express Council’s intent to update policies related to the City’s annual budget process, and to apply the $10 million underspend assumption for….

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 2, 2023
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleExpress Council’s intent to update policies related to the City’s annual budget process, and to apply the $10 million underspend assumption for 2023 and 2024 to unappropriated GF planning reserves

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. named adopted SLI sponsor record
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Request that CSCC report on staffing and call answering.SLI CSCC-300-B-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-origin Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that CSCC report on staffing and call answering.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that CSCC report on staffing and call answering

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Express Council’s intent to update policies related to the City’s annual budget process, and to apply the $10 million underspend assumption for….SLI LEG-322-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsCouncil-origin Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Express Council’s intent to update policies related to the City’s annual budget process, and to apply the $10 million underspend assumption for….

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleExpress Council’s intent to update policies related to the City’s annual budget process, and to apply the $10 million underspend assumption for 2023 and 2024 to unappropriated GF planning reserves

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Request that SPD report on backgrounding services.SLI SPD-304-A-001-2023 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2022 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originPolice Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPD report on backgrounding services.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 21, 2022
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Policeno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPD report on backgrounding services

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Request that the Seattle Fire Department (SFD) report on cost and schedule to expand Health One program.SLI SFD-002-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Public Safety & JusticeCouncil-originFire & EMS Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that the Seattle Fire Department (SFD) report on cost and schedule to expand Health One program.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Fire & EMSno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that the Seattle Fire Department (SFD) report on cost and schedule to expand Health One program

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Request that SPR report on how to improve water safety and Parks Code enforcement.SLI SPR-014-B-001 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2021 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originWater & Wastewater Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Request that SPR report on how to improve water safety and Parks Code enforcement.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 18, 2021
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Water & Wastewaterno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleRequest that SPR report on how to improve water safety and Parks Code enforcement

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Imposes controls upon the Crescent-Hamm Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….CB 119062 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2018 · Land Use & DevelopmentDepartment-originHistoric Preservation Weight 2No individual sponsor
Ordinance (Ord)ScoredDepartment-origin

Imposes controls upon the Crescent-Hamm Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code….

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 125522February 1, 2018 · Jenny Durkan administration
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
Historic Preservationno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE relating to historic preservation; imposing controls upon the Crescent-Hamm Building, a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Board under Chapter 25.12 of the Seattle Municipal Code, and adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks contained in Chapter 25.32 of the Seattle Municipal Code.

Reach 0: the direct action concerns a specific property or facility. Fiscal 0: no appropriation, revenue change, or specific expenditure is identified. Durability 1: the action changes an ordinary policy, code provision, plan, or limited-duration program. Institutional scope 0: the required action is confined to one property, facility, or transaction.

Where the proposal startedExecutive Contact/Phone:. preserved audited historical executive/department-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 1Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
No individual sponsor listed
Installation of new lighting along 62nd Ave. N.E. in Magnuson Park.SLI 10-20-B-1-2019 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2018 · Environment, Climate & ParksCouncil-originParks & Recreation Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Installation of new lighting along 62nd Ave. N.E. in Magnuson Park.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2018
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Parks & Recreationno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleInstallation of new lighting along 62nd Ave. N.E. in Magnuson Park

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Review of DON fees for new construction projects to improve cost recovery.SLI 183-1-A-1-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Government Operations & FinanceCouncil-originPermitting & Development Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Review of DON fees for new construction projects to improve cost recovery.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
Permitting & Developmentno usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleReview of DON fees for new construction projects to improve cost recovery

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
SDCI and OED report on outreach to affected communities regarding Seattle's Unreinforced Masonry (URM) building policy.SLI 140-2-A-3-2018 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2017 · Land Use & DevelopmentCouncil-origin Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

SDCI and OED report on outreach to affected communities regarding Seattle's Unreinforced Masonry (URM) building policy.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 14, 2017
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleSDCI and OED report on outreach to affected communities regarding Seattle's Unreinforced Masonry (URM) building policy

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Needs assessment by HSD for senior services.SLI 274-1-C-1-2017 · Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI) · 2016 · Health & Human ServicesCouncil-origin Weight 2No individual sponsor
Statement of Legislative Intent (SLI)ScoredCouncil-origin

Needs assessment by HSD for senior services.

OutcomeAdoptedNovember 16, 2016
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded voteNo separate tally in the record
no usable individual sponsor record
View record
Scoring details

Official titleNeeds assessment by HSD for senior services

Reach 0: the adopted action is an internal report, study, analysis, or plan request. Fiscal 0: the SLI does not itself appropriate or authorize the background program amounts it discusses. Durability 0: the request calls for a one-time report, study, analysis, or plan. Institutional scope 1: one department or city office is principally responsible for the requested work.

Where the proposal startedAdopted SLI sponsor sheet. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value2
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 1
No individual sponsor listed
Adopts Council's policy requests and reporting directions associated with Seattle's 2026 budget.Res 32196 · Resolution (Res) · 2026 · Budget & AppropriationsExcluded Weight 0No individual sponsor
Resolution (Res)ExcludedExcluded

Adopts Council's policy requests and reporting directions associated with Seattle's 2026 budget.

OutcomeAdoptedApril 14, 2026
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
deterministic exclusionmachine exclusion
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA resolution adopting the Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2026 Adopted Budget and 2026-2031 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

The record is a deterministic procedural or container exclusion and receives no working points.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. cached fiscal-note text unavailable
Maximum bill value0
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
No individual sponsor listed
Approves the Mt. Bakersville subdivision plat in King County.CB 120859 · Ordinance (Ord) · 2024 · Land Use & DevelopmentExcluded Weight 0No individual sponsor
Ordinance (Ord)ExcludedExcluded

Approves the Mt. Bakersville subdivision plat in King County.

OutcomeEnacted as Ord 127106October 3, 2024
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
deterministic exclusionmachine exclusion
View record
Scoring details

Official titleAN ORDINANCE approving and confirming the plat of “MT. BAKERSVILLE” in the portions of Northeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, Washington.

The record is a deterministic procedural or container exclusion and receives no working points.

Where the proposal startedOrigin unclear. cached fiscal-note text unavailable
Maximum bill value0
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote9 in favor · 0 opposed
No individual sponsor listed
Adopts the Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2022 Adopted Budget and 2022-2027 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.Res 32045 · Resolution (Res) · 2022 · Budget & AppropriationsExcluded Weight 0No individual sponsor
Resolution (Res)ExcludedExcluded

Adopts the Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2022 Adopted Budget and 2022-2027 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 1, 2022
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
deterministic exclusionmachine exclusion
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2022 Adopted Budget and 2022-2027 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

The record is a deterministic procedural or container exclusion and receives no working points.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value0
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote8 in favor · 0 opposed
No individual sponsor listed
Adopts the Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2021 Adopted Budget and 2021-2026 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.Res 31995 · Resolution (Res) · 2021 · Budget & AppropriationsExcluded Weight 0No individual sponsor
Resolution (Res)ExcludedExcluded

Adopts the Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2021 Adopted Budget and 2021-2026 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

OutcomeAdoptedMarch 1, 2021
Official sponsorsNo individual sponsor listed
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
deterministic exclusionmachine exclusion
View record
Scoring details

Official titleA RESOLUTION adopting the Statements of Legislative Intent for the 2021 Adopted Budget and 2021-2026 Adopted Capital Improvement Program.

The record is a deterministic procedural or container exclusion and receives no working points.

Where the proposal startedLegislative Department. preserved audited historical Council-origin classification
Maximum bill value0
Reach 0Fiscal scale 0Legal durability 0Institutional scope 0
Recorded vote7 in favor · 0 opposed
No individual sponsor listed